ESMA publishes report on cross-border marketing of funds including statistics on notifications 06 January 2026 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its third report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under the Regulation on cross-border distribution of funds . For the first time, the report includes statistics on notifications of cross-border marketing of funds. Drawing on input from ...
ESMA signs Memorandum of Understanding with the Reserve Bank of India 27 January 2026 CCP International cooperation The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to facilitate cooperation and exchange of information for the recognition of central counterparties (CCPs) established in India and supervised by RBI. This agreement marks a significant step...
We have signed a contract with Etrading Software (ETS) to deliver the UK bond consolidated tape. A high-quality tape will provide investors with a comprehensive overview of the bond market and support price formation and liquidity. It will help maintain the UK’s position as a highly competitive and compelling place to invest and grow.ETS has now launched a website that sets out key milestones and provides technical information for data contributors and users. We will continue to support ETS a...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed settled charges against Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and its former executives, Vince Macciocchi and Ray Young, and a litigated action against its former executive Vikram Luthar, for …
Sanctions & settlements MAR Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an investment services provider and its director a total of €850,000
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul S. Atkins and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Michael S. Selig will hold a joint event, previously scheduled for Jan. 27, now rescheduled for Thursday, Jan. 29, from 2 p.m. to 3 p.m. at CFTC…
The latest Accelerated Settlement Taskforce (AST) report updates on the significant progress made towards the move to T+1. Read the AST report.Jamie Bell, head of capital markets at the FCA, said:'T+1 marks a major milestone in our drive to support growth and innovation. Faster settlement cycles will reduce risk, free up capital for faster reinvestment and align with other major markets.'We are delighted to see the great progress made last year highlighted in the AST’s report. By the end of t...
FINRA issued an Information Notice on January 3, 2025, modifying the Contrary Exercise Advice (CEA) cut-off time for options expiring on January 9, 2025, from the standard 5:30 p.m. ET to 10:00 a.m. ET due to the National Day of Mourning. This time-sensitive directive required immediate operational adjustments for all broker-dealers and clearing members handling options exercise instructions on that specific date.
What Changed
The primary regulatory modification addresses a single-day exception to standard options exercise procedures:
CEA Cut-Off Time Acceleration: The normal 5:30 p.m. ET deadline for submitting Contrary Exercise Advice was compressed to 10:00 a.m. ET on January 9, 2025.
Exercise Instruction Acceptance Window: Members could not accept exercise instructions for either customer or non-customer accounts after 10:00 a.m. ET on that date.
OCC Processing Unchanged: The Options Clearing Corporation's proc
What You Need To Do
*Update Internal Procedures
*System Configuration
*Staff Communication
*Customer Notification
*Submission Coordination
Key Dates
January 9, 2025 - 10:00 a.m. ETFinal deadline for option holders to make exercise/non-exercise decisions and for members to accept exercise instructions (accelerated from standard 5:30 p.m. ET)DEADLINE
January 9, 2025 - 10:00 a.m. ETFinal deadline for members to submit Contrary Exercise Advice to exchanges or OCC (accelerated from standard 5:30 p.m. ET or 7:30 p.m. ET depending on account type and submission method)DEADLINE
January 9, 2025National Day of Mourning; national options exchanges closed; exercises in specified option classes prohibited
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH (for January 9, 2025 operations; now historical)
This FINRA Information Notice announces the SEC's reduction of the Section 31 fee rate to $0.00 per million dollars in specified securities transactions, effective May 14, 2025, following the SEC's Fee Rate Advisory for Fiscal Year 2025. It matters because it eliminates these transaction fees for FINRA member firms for the remainder of FY 2025 (and potentially beyond until FY 2026 appropriations), reducing costs and simplifying billing processes amid the SEC's over-collection of its appropriation target.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
#
What Changed
The Section 31 fee rate drops from $27.80 per million dollars to $0.00 per million dollars for covered securities transactions on exchanges and over-the-counter markets, applicable to trade dates (charge dates) of May 14, 2025, or later.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
The assessment on security futures transactions remains unchanged at $0.0042 per round turn transaction.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
FINRA wil
What You Need To Do
Update internal billing, invoicing, and financial reporting systems to reflect the $0
Review and adjust any automated fee calculations or client pass-through mechanisms for transactions on or after the effective date
Contact FINRA's Amanda Rath for finance questions ((240) 386-6637) or SEC's Robert McNamee/Faisal Sheikh for legal/interpretive issues; monitor SEC website for updates
Test systems for security futures (unchanged rate) and confirm no inadvertent charging of Section 31 fees post-effective date
Key Dates
April 8, 2025- SEC announces Fee Rate Advisory for Fiscal Year 2025.
April 24, 2025- FINRA publishes Information Notice.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
May 13, 2025- Last day for current rate of $27.80 per million (trade dates through this date).[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
May 14, 2025- New rate of $0.00 per million takes effect for trade dates (charge dates) on or after this date; applies to OTC sales and options settlements/exercises.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
Ongoing until 60 days after FY 2026 appropriation enactment- $0.00 rate remains in effect.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a beneficial change eliminating fees due to SEC over-collection, with no new requirements or penalties; firms already past the May 14, 2025, effective date (as of January 2026) face minimal risk if systems were updated timely. It matters for cost savings, accurate financials,
This FINRA Information Notice announces the termination of **Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-1** effective July 1, 2025, with **Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-2** taking effect for transactions in eligible securities by FINRA member CAT executing brokers. It matters because firms must transition billing and payment processes seamlessly to avoid disruptions in CAT cost recovery compliance under FINRA Rule 6897(b)(1)(D).
#
What Changed
Termination of Fee 2025-1: No longer applied to transactions after June 30, 2025, per FINRA Rule 6897(b)(1)(D), which requires notice upon replacement by a subsequent fee.
Implementation of Fee 2025-2: New fee recovers FINRA's ~$7.27 million share of budgeted CAT costs for July 1–December 31, 2025; monthly invoicing begins for July 2025 transactions.
Distinction from CAT LLC fees: Unrelated to "CAT Fee 2025-1" (assessed by CAT LLC, rate $0.000022 per transaction, remains in effect).
#
What You Need To Do
Verify internal systems stop applying Fee 2025-1 post-June 30, 2025, and prepare for Fee 2025-2 invoicing starting July transactions
Review and pay final Fee 2025-1 invoice (due August 2025) per Rule 6897(b)(2)
Update budgeting/forecasting models for Fee 2025-2 (covers H2 2025 CAT costs); monitor FINRA notices for rate details via SR-FINRA-2025-010
Contact Amanda Rath ((240) 386-6637) or Faisal Sheikh ((202) 728-8379) for questions
Distinguish FINRA fees from CAT LLC fees to avoid double-counting in financial controls
Key Dates
June 30, 2025- Last day Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-1 applies to transactions.
July 1, 2025- Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-2 takes effect for transactions.
July 2025- Last invoice sent for Fee 2025-1 (based on June 2025 transactions).
August 2025- Payments due for Fee 2025-1 final invoice; first invoices for Fee 2025-2 issued (based on July transactions).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Primarily administrative; no new reporting burdens, but failure to transition could lead to underpayment, late fees, or Rule 6897 violations. Matters for high-volume brokers due to monthly cash flow impacts and ongoing CAT funding obligations (totaling FINRA's 2025 budgeted costs).
This FINRA Information Notice dated August 14, 2025, reminds registered persons and firms of annual continuing education (CE) requirements under FINRA Rule 1240, including 2025 Regulatory Element completion by December 31, 2025, and resources for Firm Element plans via the FLEX catalog. It matters because non-compliance triggers automatic CE inactive status, halting registered activities, with today's date (January 25, 2026) indicating the deadline has passed, requiring immediate remediation for affected individuals.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
#
What Changed
Effective January 1, 2023, amendments to FINRA Rule 1240 mandate annual completion of both Regulatory Element and Firm Element for all registered persons, per CE Council recommendations.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
Launched July 1, 2024, the Financial Learning Experience (FLEX) serves as an optional centralized catalog for Firm Element e-learning courses to support written training plans.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notic
What You Need To Do
Registered persons
Verify FinPro access/recovery; contact FINRA Testing and Continuing Education Department for questions
Key Dates
January 1, 2023- Effective date of CE rule amendments requiring annual Regulatory and Firm Elements.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
July 1, 2024- Launch of FLEX catalog for Firm Element resources.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
October 1 (annually)- FINRA publishes upcoming Regulatory Element topics by registration category.
December 31, 2025- Deadline to complete 2025 Regulatory Element courses; non-completion results in automatic CE inactive status.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - The December 31, 2025, deadline has passed (as of January 25, 2026), meaning non-compliant registered persons are already CE inactive and barred from registered functions until remediation, risking operational disruptions, exam retakes, or enforcement. Firms face supervisory liabilit
FINRA's Information Notice dated October 21, 2025, reminds member firms of NSCC's amendment to Rule 50, effective October 17, 2025, which removes the "Settle Prep Day" from the ACATS process, shortening full customer account transfers to 3-4 business days. This matters because it aligns with FINRA Rule 11870's requirements to expedite transfers, enhances operational efficiency, reduces risk, and improves client experience amid broader industry shifts like T+1 settlement.[original notice]
#
What Changed
Removal of Settle Prep Day: NSCC Rule 50 amended to eliminate the settlement preparation stage from ACATS, effective October 17, 2025, streamlining the process for all securities transfers.[original notice]
Mutual Fund/Options Synchronization: Eliminates the extra day for processing mutual funds and options via Fund/SERV, aligning their settlement with other assets; also removes the second day of Fund/SERV pending acknowledgment.[original notice]
Overall Timeline Reduction: Full ACATS transfers
September 10, 2025- Federal Register publication of SEC approval (90 FR 43709).[original notice]
October 17, 2025- Effective date: Removal of Settle Prep Day and Fund/SERV changes; firms must support next-day settling assets.[original notice]DEADLINE
October 2026- Planned modernization of ACATS client interfaces (decommission of legacy formats; migration to JSON/MQ for enhanced messaging).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Effective over three months ago (as of January 2026), with industry-wide accommodation confirmed; no new mandates but requires ongoing operational alignment to avoid Rule 11870 violations (e.g., delays in validation or exceptions). Matters for reducing transfer failures, enhancing
FINRA's Information Notice 11/7/25 publishes a **2026 Filing Schedule** on its website to guide clearing firms on accurate submission dates for extensions of time under Federal Reserve Regulation T, SEA Rule 15c3-3, and FINRA Rule 4210, accounting for holidays and business days. This matters because the automated REX system rejects incorrect dates, forcing resubmissions that delay compliance and risk regulatory violations amid shortened settlement cycles.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory requirements or rule amendments; this is guidance providing a pre-calculated Filing Schedule for 2026 to prevent errors in the REX system. It emphasizes using schedule dates around holidays when exchanges or banks close, and confirms fixed SEA Rule 15c3-3 deadlines (e.g., 30th/45th calendar days post-settlement, 10th business day for (m) possession/control, regardless of foreign settlement cycles).
#
What You Need To Do
Access and reference the 2026 Filing Schedule on FINRA's website (via https://www
Input schedule-specific dates for extensions, particularly around 2026 holidays when exchanges/banks close, to avoid automatic denials
File SEA Rule 15c3-3 extensions on exact due dates listed above, even for foreign-traded securities
Contact Theresa Reynolds (646-315-8567 or email) for questions
Update internal compliance calendars, training, and systems to integrate the schedule
Key Dates
November 7, 2025- Notice published; 2026 Filing Schedule made available on FINRA website.
Throughout 2026- Use Filing Schedule for all extension requests, especially pre/post-holidays (e.g., Veterans Day 11/11/2026 bank holiday, Thanksgiving 11/26/2026, Christmas 12/25/2026).
30th calendar day after settlement- (d)(2).
45th calendar day after settlement- (d)(3), (h).
2nd business day after 30th calendar day from segregation deficit- (d)(4).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Proactive guidance prevents operational disruptions from REX rejections, but no immediate deadlines or penalties for non-use; however, inaccurate filings risk delayed margin compliance, customer liquidations under Regulation T, or possession/control failures under SEA Rule 15c3-3,
FINRA Information Notice 11/10/25 provides due dates for 2026 and Q1 2027 filings of Annual Reports, FOCUS Reports, Form Custody, and various supplemental schedules under SEA Rule 17a-5 and FINRA Rule 4524. It matters because it ensures timely electronic submissions via FINRA Gateway, incorporates SEC amendments for EDGAR PDF filings (with future Interactive Data requirements), and highlights a 30-day extension option for qualifying smaller firms, helping prevent compliance failures amid federal holidays. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251110
#
What Changed
Electronic Filing Mandates: All specified filings must be submitted electronically via FINRA Gateway; SEC no longer accepts paper Annual Reports, requiring EDGAR PDF submissions under amended SEA Rule 17a-5(d)(6)(i). https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251110
SEC Interactive Data Compliance Dates: Annual reports and supplements must be filed as Interactive Data Files per Rule 405 of Regulation S-T; firms with net capital ≥$250,000 (as of Dec 31, 2025) comply for fi
What You Need To Do
Submit all filings electronically via FINRA Gateway by 11:59 p
For 30-day extension
Affirm de minimis exemptions in eFOCUS for OBS/SIS/SLS where applicable
Prepare for Interactive Data
Contact firm's Risk Monitoring Analyst for questions; review eFOCUS guidance and SIPC site
Key Dates
2026Nov 30, 2025 period (ext: March 2, 2026)
2026Dec 31, 2025 period (ext: March 31, 2026)
2026Jan 31, 2026 period (ext: May 1, 2026)
2026Feb 28, 2026 period (ext: May 29, 2026)
2026March 31, 2026 period (ext: June 29, 2026)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Multiple imminent deadlines (e.g., January 27-29, 2026 for Q4 2025 filings, just days from today), mandatory electronic/EDGAR shifts, and late fees/exam risks for misses; smaller firms gain extension relief but must notify promptly. Non-compliance risks enforcement under SEA Rule 17a
FINRA Information Notice 11/14/25 summarizes SEC amendments to SEA Rule 17a-5 mandating electronic filing of broker-dealer annual reports, supplemental reports, and Form 17-H on EDGAR in PDF format, alongside FOCUS Report updates including electronic signatures and elimination of notarization. These changes modernize submissions, eliminate paper filings to the SEC, and impose new interactive data requirements with phased compliance, requiring broker-dealers to secure EDGAR access and adapt processes promptly to avoid disruptions.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
#
What Changed
Electronic Filing Mandate: SEC no longer accepts paper submissions of annual reports (Form X-17A-5 Part III), supplemental reports under SEA Rule 17a-5(k), and Form 17-H; all must be filed on EDGAR in PDF format.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
Electronic Signatures Permitted: Allowed for all SEA Rule 17a-5 reports (including annual and FOCUS Reports) via specified processes, e.g., Adobe Acrobat digitally signed certificates with document locking; FOCUS
What You Need To Do
Implement electronic signature processes (e
Retain signed Oath or Affirmation for 6 years per SEA Rule 17a-4 (no notarization)
Review FINRA eFOCUS page for FOCUS amendments; prepare for interactive data filings per net capital tier (test systems in advance)
Direct questions to firm's Risk Monitoring Analyst
Key Dates
June 30, 2025Electronic PDF filing on EDGAR mandatory for annual reports (fiscal years ending on/after this date), supplemental reports (SEA Rule 17a-5(k)), and Form 17-H; no paper accepted.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
December 31, 2025Reference date for determining firm net capital threshold ($250,000+) for interactive data compliance phasing.DEADLINE
June 30, 2027Interactive Data File requirement applies to filings due on/after for firms with ≥ $250,000 minimum net capital (as of 12/31/2025).DEADLINE
June 30, 2029Interactive Data File requirement applies to filings due on/after for firms with < $250,000 minimum net capital (as of 12/31/2025).DEADLINE
As early as possible pre-due dateSubmit Form ID for EDGAR access (5-7 business day approval delay).[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate action needed for EDGAR access and PDF filings (past June 30, 2025 deadline as of January 2026), risking filing rejections or enforcement if unprepared; interactive data adds future burden but allows planning. Matters due to SEC's zero-tolerance for paper, potential delays
FINRA Information Notice 11/17/25 reminds member firms of a modified exercise cut-off time for standardized equity options expiring on November 28, 2025, due to national options exchanges closing early at 1:00 p.m. ET on the Friday after Thanksgiving. This adjustment shifts the deadline for option holders' final exercise decisions from 5:30 p.m. ET to 2:30 p.m. ET under FINRA Rule 2360(b)(23)(A)(viii). It matters for compliance as firms must enforce this deadline to avoid regulatory violations, protect client positions, and manage operational risks during a holiday-shortened trading day.
#
What Changed
National options exchanges will close at 1:00 p.m. ET on November 28, 2025, triggering a modified exercise cut-off under FINRA Rule 2360(b)(23)(A)(viii): deadline is 1 hour 30 minutes after close (i.e., 2:30 p.m. ET), overriding the standard 5:30 p.m. ET.
Firms may set earlier internal deadlines for accepting exercise instructions but cannot accept any after 2:30 p.m. ET per FINRA Rule 2360(b)(23)(A)(vi).
Reiterates standard procedures: in-the-money options auto-exercise under OCC Rule 805 (Exer
What You Need To Do
Update client communications
Configure systems and procedures
Train staff
Monitor and record
Contact FINRA contacts (James Turnbull or Matthew Vitek) for clarification
Key Dates
November 17, 2025- Publication of FINRA Information Notice 11/17/25 reminding firms of upcoming modified cut-off.
November 28, 2025, 1:00 p.m. ET- Early close of national options exchanges.
November 28, 2025, 2:30 p.m. ET- Firm deadline to accept final exercise/not-exercise decisions (no later instructions permitted).DEADLINE
2026); relevant for historical compliance review or similar future holidays.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low (post-event as of January 2026). This is a one-time reminder for a past holiday adjustment, with low risk of enforcement absent systemic failures. It matters operationally to prevent erroneous exercises, client disputes, or capital charges from uncollected exercise costs, but non-compli
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues. To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
GC25/1 within Primary Market Bulletin No. 55 consults on targeted amendments to FCA Knowledge Base technical notes to align with UK Listing Rules (UKLR) changes effective 29 July 2024 and a new ESEF taxonomy for digital reporting. This matters for listed issuers and advisors as it updates formal guidance on periodic reporting, inside information handling, and position disclosures, ensuring compliance with post-reform listing regime requirements.
#
What Changed
Amendments to five technical notes: FCA/TN/506.2 (Periodic financial information and inside information), Primary Market/TN/507.1 (Structured digital reporting for IFRS annual statements, reflecting new ESEF taxonomy per DTR 4.1.15R), UKLA/TN/520.2 (Delaying disclosure/dealing with leaks and rumours), UKLA/TN/521.3 (Assessing and handling inside information), and UKLA/TN/542.2 (Issuer's obligations on position disclosures).
Broader PMB 55 finalises 44 notes (e.g., TN/209.4 on Listing Principle 2
What You Need To Do
Review blacklined amendments in GC25/1 and PMB 55; submit feedback by 15 May 2025 if impacted
Update internal policies, training, and procedures to reflect finalised notes (e
Until finalised, interpret existing guidance in light of UKLR; monitor for TN/710 update in future PMB
For digital reporting, prepare for new ESEF taxonomy in annual IFRS statements
Key Dates
2025Guidance Consultation opens.
2025Guidance Consultation closes; comments due to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk.DEADLINE
July 2025(target) - FCA intends to finalise consulted notes.
2024UKLR effective date (context for updates).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Past consultation deadline (15 May 2025) as of January 2026, but finalisation expected by July 2025 requires proactive policy reviews to avoid non-compliance with updated listing guidance. Matters for market integrity and operational alignment with UKLR reforms, with low immediate
The FCA's GC25/2: Primary Market Bulletin No. 57 (PMB 57), published 25 July 2025, consults on amendments to Technical Note 710.1 ('Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors') and a new Technical Note 638.1 on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules for prospectuses. This matters as it updates the Knowledge Base to align with the new UK Listing Regime (UKLR) and Prospectus Rules, providing clarity for sponsors and issuers ahead of the PRM sourcebook effective January 2026, reducing compliance risks in primary markets.
#
What Changed
Amendments to TN 710.1 (Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors): Revisions clarify the scope of 'preparatory work' and sponsor obligations under UKLR 4, building on feedback from PMB 48, 53, and PS24/6; changes marked against PMB 53 version.
New TN 638.1 (Guidance on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules): Updated draft provides detailed guidance for prospectus applications by companies with complex histories (e.g., acquisitive models), including scenarios, exam
What You Need To Do
Review and respond
Update policies/processes
Monitor finalisation
Implement NSM changes
Key Dates
2025Consultation opens (GC25/2 published).
2025Consultation closes (submit comments to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk).
2026New Prospectus Rules: Admission to Trading on a Regulated Market (PRM) sourcebook, UKLR changes, and Market Conduct amendments effective (per PS25/9).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Consultation closed 12/09/2025 (past deadline as of January 2026), but final notes (e.g., TN 710 by end-2025) and PRM effective 19/01/2026 require immediate policy reviews to avoid prospectus rejections or sponsor breaches. Matters for primary market competitiveness and investor pr
The FCA's CP25/31 proposes a regulatory framework for introducing a UK equity Consolidated Tape (CT), operated by a Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP), to collate and distribute comprehensive post-trade data (prices and volumes) across trading venues and OTC trades in equities, including shares, ETFs, depository receipts, and similar instruments. This matters for compliance as it imposes new data contribution obligations on trading venues and APAs, aims to enhance market transparency and competitiveness under the FCA's 2025-2030 Strategy, and builds on FSMA 2023 powers for Data Reporting Services Providers (DRSPs). Firms must engage now to shape rules via consultation, with potential operations targeted for 2027.
#
What Changed
CTP Obligations: Proposed rules establish core regulatory requirements for CTPs, including governance, operational resiliency, data collation/distribution, competitive pricing, and simple licensing structures to ensure accessibility and affordability.
Data Contributor Obligations: Trading venues and Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs) must provide trade data (e.g., prices, volumes) to the CTP, covering trades across venues and OTC equity transactions.
Scope and Outcomes: CT focuses on post-
What You Need To Do
Respond to Consultation
Data Readiness
Monitor Updates
Engage Stakeholders
Compliance Mapping
Key Dates
2025Consultation opens and CP25/31 first published.
2026Consultation page last updated; period extended.
2026Consultation closes (extended from original dates).
2026FCA to publish CP on equity transparency regime (linked to CT).
2027Target for equity CT to be operational.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While still in consultation (closes 13/02/2026), proposals mandate data contributions from trading venues/APAs and CTP setup, with 2027 operations targeted; non-engagement risks misaligned systems or missed CTP opportunities. Matters due to FSMA 2023 empowerment, links to equity tran
On 6 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 2.500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €2,500 disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft on 6 November 2025 for failing to submit its 2024 financial year accounting documents electronically to the Bundesanzeiger within the required period, breaching section 325 HGB. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's oversight of basic disclosure obligations under the German Commercial Code, serving as a reminder that even minor procedural lapses can trigger sanctions amid heightened scrutiny of listed companies' reporting. Compliance teams should note this as indicative of rigorous enforcement on timely electronic filings, particularly for firms under financial stress like BayWa.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement of existing requirements under the German Commercial Code (HGB):
Section 325 HGB: Mandates submission of accounting documents (e.g., annual financial statements, management reports) for public disclosure via the Bundesanzeiger operator in electronic form within prescribed deadlines (typically three months after fiscal year-end for annual reports).
Section 335 HGB: Provides the legal basis for disciplinary fines by the BfJ for non-compliance, wit
What You Need To Do
Verify internal processes for electronic submission of accounting documents to Bundesanzeiger within HGB timelines (e
Implement automated reminders and dual-checks in finance/reporting workflows to prevent delays, especially during restructurings or audits
Review and update compliance calendars for all HGB-disclosure obligations; conduct training for finance teams on section 325/335 HGB
Monitor Bundesanzeiger portal for submission confirmations and retain proofs of timely filing to defend against BfJ inquiries
For firms like BayWa in StaRUG proceedings, coordinate with courts/legal advisors to file provisional disclosures if full audits are delayed
Key Dates
31 December 2024End of BayWa AG's financial year; accounting documents due for submission shortly after (typically by 31 March 2025 for three-month deadline under section 325 HGB).DEADLINE
6 November 2025BfJ issues disciplinary fine order for late submission.
23 January 2026BaFin publishes the enforcement notice.
2026_01_23_baywa_ag_2_en.html
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low – This is a minor fine (€2,500) for a procedural breach with no appeal, signaling routine enforcement rather than a policy shift. It matters as a low-cost warning for all HGB-reporting firms to automate filings, avoiding escalation in repeat cases or amid BaFin's focus on disclosure (e.
The Federal Office of Justice in Germany imposed a disciplinary fine of 2,500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft for failing to submit its accounting documents for the financial year 2024 in electronic form within the prescribed period. This action highlights the importance of compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code. Companies must ensure timely submission of financial reports to avoid similar penalties.
What Changed
The Federal Office of Justice enforced section 325 of the German Commercial Code, which requires companies to submit their accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form within the prescribed period.
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of accounting documents in electronic form to the German Federal Gazette
Review internal procedures to guarantee compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
Key Dates
6 Nov 2025The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft
Non-Compliance Risk
Disciplinary fines, such as the 2,500 euros imposed on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft, for non-compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
On 6 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 2.500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €2,500 disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft on 6 November 2025 for failing to submit its 2024 consolidated accounting documents electronically to the Bundesanzeiger within the required period, violating section 325 HGB. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's oversight of financial reporting obligations under German law and serves as a reminder of strict deadlines for public disclosure, even amid corporate challenges like BayWa's ongoing restructuring. Compliance teams should note it as a low-value but procedurally significant sanction, highlighting risks of administrative penalties for late filings.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement of existing requirements under the German Commercial Code (HGB):
Section 325 HGB: Mandates submission of consolidated accounting documents (e.g., annual financial statements, management reports) for disclosure in electronic form to the Bundesanzeiger operator within prescribed periods (typically three months after fiscal year-end for AGs, i.e., by 31 March for calendar-year filers).
Section 335 HGB: Provides the legal basis for disciplinary fine
What You Need To Do
Verify filing processes
Conduct gap analysis
Train staff
Monitor Bundesanzeiger confirmations
No appeal if fined
Key Dates
31 March 2025- Presumed deadline for BayWa to submit 2024 consolidated documents (three months post-31 December FY-end under § 325 HGB para. 1).DEADLINE
6 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €2,500 fine.
23 January 2026- BaFin publication date of the enforcement notice[https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Massnahmen/40c_neu_124_WpHG/neu/meldung_2026_01_23_baywa_ag_1_en.html].
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - Fine is minimal (€2,500), procedural (no market manipulation or fraud), and isolated to one late filing amid BayWa's broader crises (e.g., forecast withdrawal 6 Oct 2025[https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/eqs/baywa-ag-baywa-ord-shs--0ah7/eqs-adhoc-baywa-ag-baywa-ag-withdraws-f
The Federal Office of Justice in Germany imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft for failing to submit its consolidated accounting documents for the financial year 2024 within the prescribed period. This action highlights the importance of timely submission of financial reports. Companies must ensure compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code to avoid similar penalties.
What Changed
The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine due to a breach of section 325 of the German Commercial Code, which requires companies to submit their consolidated accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form within the prescribed period.
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of consolidated accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form
Review and update internal procedures to comply with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
Key Dates
6 Nov 2025The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft
Non-Compliance Risk
Disciplinary fine of up to 2,500 euros for non-compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul S. Atkins and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Michael S. Selig will hold a joint event on Tuesday, Jan. 27, from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. at CFTC headquarters to discuss harmonization between the…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee announced that it will hold a public meeting at the SEC Headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026, at 10 a.m. ET. The meeting will also be…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today approved the 2026 budget for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the related accounting support fee.The 2026 PCAOB budget totals $362.1 million. The 2026 budget reflects a 9.4% ($37.6…
The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates for appointment as members of the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, established pursuant to Section 39 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to help protect investors and improve securities…
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2025 accounts: the AMF flags up points for vigilance and issues recommendations
The Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) successfully prosecuted retail trader Ng Ka Hei for seven counts of false trading involving six Main Board-listed companies, resulting in conviction on January 22, 2026. This enforcement action demonstrates the SFC's active surveillance and prosecution of market manipulation tactics, specifically "scaffolding" and wash trading strategies that artificially inflate share prices and mislead market participants.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement precedent establishing that:
"Scaffolding" strategy is prosecutable: Repeatedly placing and cancelling trading orders at progressively higher prices constitutes false trading under section 295 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance.
Wash trading across multiple accounts is actionable: Using various securities accounts to simultaneously act as both buyer and seller of shares violates false trading prohibitions.
Price impact + market de
What You Need To Do
*For brokers and licensed intermediaries
*Enhance surveillance systems to detect scaffolding patterns (repeated placement and cancellation of orders at progressively higher prices)
*Monitor cross-account trading to identify wash trading where the same beneficial owner trades with themselves across multiple accounts
*Implement controls to flag suspicious trading activity that artificially impacts share prices without genuine economic purpose
*Document compliance procedures for detecting and reporting false trading under section 295 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance
Key Dates
20 September 2022 – 24 October 2023Period during which false trading occurred
22 January 2026Conviction date (Eastern Magistrates' Courts)
12 February 2026Sentencing hearing (case adjourned)
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has convicted a retail trader for false trading in the shares of six Hong Kong-listed companies, highlighting the importance of market integrity and the need for firms to monitor and prevent such activities. The conviction demonstrates the SFC's commitment to enforcing securities laws and protecting market participants. Firms should review their trading practices and ensure they have adequate controls in place to prevent false trading.
What Changed
The SFC has successfully prosecuted a case of false trading under section 295 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance, which constitutes an offence.
What You Need To Do
Implement or review existing controls to detect and prevent false trading, including monitoring for suspicious trading patterns such as 'scaffolding' and wash trades
Provide training to trading staff on the risks and consequences of false trading
Key Dates
12 Feb 2026Sentencing of Mr Ng Ka Hei
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, and reputational damage may result from non-compliance with securities laws and regulations related to false trading.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates to fill a limited number of vacancies on the agency’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee, which provides advice and recommendations to the Commission on rules, regulations, and…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the senior team from the Division of Corporation Finance responsible for advising division Director James Moloney on all matters the division has before the Commission. These include rulemaking…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Christina M. Thomas will rejoin the Division of Corporation Finance in February as deputy director and chief advisor on disclosure, policy, and rulemaking.“Christina brings her deep technical…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Keith E. Cassidy has been appointed Director of the Division of Examinations. Mr. Cassidy has served as Acting Director since May 2024 and previously was the division’s Deputy Director, Acting…
We have issued a joint statement with the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) giving clarity on open banking pricing models. We and the PSR have issued the following statement (PDF).This confirms we will not, at this stage, prioritise a Competition Act 1998 (CA98) investigation into the centralised ‘access fee’ pricing model being developed by the UK Payments Initiative (UKPI) for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs). cVRPs are an emerging open banking technology that allow consumers to...
AI Analysis
The FCA and PSR have jointly confirmed they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation into the UK Payments Initiative's (UKPI) centralized access fee pricing model for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs), with the CMA's concurrent agreement. This regulatory clarity provides temporary certainty for cVRP development ahead of anticipated legislation by end-2026, creating a critical window for firms to develop compliant commercial models in this emerging open banking technology.
What Changed
The regulatory statement establishes the following key positions:
Non-prioritization of CA98 investigation: The FCA, PSR, and CMA have jointly confirmed they will not prioritize competition law enforcement against UKPI's centralized access fee model for Phase 1/Wave 1 cVRPs (limited to "lower risk" use cases).
Scope limitation: The regulatory clarity applies only to Phase 1/Wave 1 of UKPI's cVRP scheme, specifically addressing lower-risk payment use cases including regulated financial services
What You Need To Do
*For UKPI and participating firms
*Governance documentation
*Pricing methodology transparency
*Phase 1/Wave 1 compliance
*Market engagement
Key Dates
15 January 2026- FCA and PSR wrote to CMA setting out their non-prioritization position
16 January 2026- CMA confirmed alignment with FCA/PSR position on CA98 prioritization
20 January 2026- Joint FCA/PSR statement issued on open banking pricing models
Q1 2026- Expected first live UKPI cVRP payments
End of 2026- Government anticipated to introduce legislative framework granting FCA new open banking powers
The FCA and PSR have issued a joint statement providing clarity on open banking pricing models, specifically regarding the centralised 'access fee' pricing model for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs). This statement confirms that they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation into this model at this stage. The goal is to support the development of cVRPs, giving consumers more control over their payments and lowering processing fees for businesses.
What Changed
The FCA and PSR have clarified their enforcement position on the UKPI's proposal for a commercial model for cVRPs, indicating they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation at this stage.
What You Need To Do
Monitor market developments and updates on the legislative framework for open banking
Review and understand the implications of the centralised 'access fee' pricing model for cVRPs on your business operations
Ensure compliance with existing competition laws and regulations
Key Dates
31 Dec 2026Expected implementation of the government's legislative framework for open bankingDEADLINE
1 Jul 2027End of the temporary measure if the legislative framework is not implementedDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties for non-compliance with competition laws and regulations
Supervision Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the role and involvement of the compliance function at investment services providers
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusi
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by mid-2026)
*Conduct impact assessment
*Review IRB permissions
*Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
*Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026– PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027– Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027– Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028– FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadline– Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessmentDEADLINE
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027Basel 3.1 rules take effectDEADLINE
1 Jan 2028Internal model approach for market risk takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based A
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by Q2 2026)
*Review applicability
*Assess impact
*Identify policy changes
*Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026- PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025- PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027- All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The restated CRR provisions take effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
We have opened applications for the second cohort of our AI Live Testing service. AI Live Testing is the first of its kind in the financial sector to help firms who are ready to use AI in UK financial markets. Participating firms receive tailored support from our regulatory team and our technical partner Advai to develop, assess and deploy safe and responsible AI.The service helps firms to consider key questions around evaluating AI including governance, risk management and monitoring to help...
The CFTC announced three major enforcement actions on January 16, 2026, resolving cases involving **market manipulation (spoofing), misappropriation of confidential information, and unregistered commodity pool operations**. These cases demonstrate the CFTC's continued enforcement focus on fraudulent trading practices and registration violations, with combined penalties exceeding $685,000 and criminal sentences totaling over six years in prison.
What Changed
The enforcement actions establish precedent in three critical areas:
*Market Manipulation (Spoofing): The CFTC secured consent orders against precious metals futures traders for spoofing—placing and canceling orders to create false market impressions. The orders impose three-year and six-month trading bans** and require cease-and-desist compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act's spoofing prohibition.
*Misappropriation and Fictitious Trading: The CFTC obtained permanent injunctive relief requ
What You Need To Do
*For Registered Futures Firms and Banks
trade and post-trade compliance controls
*For Commodity Pool Operators and Investment Advisors:
by-jurisdiction licensing analyses before soliciting investors
*For All Market Participants
Key Dates
September 2019- CFTC enforcement action filed against Smith and Nowak
December 2021- CFTC complaint filed against Miller and Omerta Capital; DOJ criminal charges filed
December 2022- CFTC complaint amended against Miller and Omerta Capital
August 2023- Smith and Nowak sentenced to prison (criminal case)
June 2024- Miller sentenced to prison (criminal case)
The CFTC has announced enforcement updates, including civil monetary penalties and trading bans for spoofing in precious metals futures markets and misappropriating confidential information. These updates highlight the importance of compliance with CFTC regulations. Firms must ensure they are registered and comply with anti-spoofing and anti-fraud regulations.
What Changed
The CFTC has obtained federal court orders imposing civil monetary penalties and trading bans on individuals and firms for spoofing and misappropriating confidential information. The CFTC has also charged an unregistered commodity pool operator with fraud and registration violations.
What You Need To Do
Verify registration with the CFTC at NFA BASIC before committing funds
Review and update anti-spoofing and anti-fraud policies and procedures
Ensure compliance with CFTC regulations regarding commodity pool operations and futures market participation
Key Dates
1 Sept 2021CFTC enforcement action filed against Gregg Smith and Michael Nowak
10 Dec 2021Department of Justice charged Peter Miller with conspiracy to commit commodities fraud
1 Jun 2024Peter Miller sentenced to five months in prison and five months of home confinement
10 Dec 2024Department of Justice charged Travis Ford with conspiracy to commit wire fraud
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, trading bans, and registration revocation
The FCA has fined Russel Gerrity £309,843 for using inside information to net himself £128,765. As a consultant, Mr Gerrity had access to information about whether oil and gas had been discovered during the drilling of wells. Between October 2018 and January 2022, he took advantage of this and used inside information to buy shares in Chariot Oil & Gas Limited and Eco (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Plc ahead of announcements that increased their price. On another occasion, he used inside information t...
The CSSF's January 2026 enforcement report documents the results of its 2025 examination campaign on 2024 financial and non-financial disclosures by issuers under Luxembourg's Transparency Law. This publication is critical for compliance professionals because it reveals systematic compliance gaps across financial reporting (IFRS), sustainability reporting (ESRS), and Alternative Performance Measures (APMs), with 27% of enforcement decisions resulting in injunctions for non-compliance.
What Changed
The regulatory landscape has evolved significantly with the introduction of new sustainability reporting requirements:
ESRS Implementation (First Year): 2024 marked the first full reporting year under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), with the CSSF conducting a fact-finding exercise to assess reporting quality. The CSSF noted an overall increase in reporting quality with better-structured reports and more relevant disclosures, though key improvement areas remain in compreh
What You Need To Do
*Financial Information (IFRS)
*Enhanced Note Disclosures
*Cash Flow Statement Presentation
*Segment Reporting Completeness
*Going Concern Assessment
Key Dates
4 July 2025- European Commission adopted Delegated Act amending Taxonomy Disclosures (Omnibus package)
18 August 2025- CSSF published full results of fact-finding exercise on ESRS reporting
5 December 2024- CSSF published enforcement priorities press release for FY2024 reporting
January 2026- CSSF published enforcement results report (current publication)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that J. Russell “Rusty” McGranahan has been named SEC General Counsel. As the SEC’s chief legal officer, Mr. McGranahan will oversee the provision of legal expertise and advice to the Office of the…
On 07 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50.000 euros on pferdewetten.de AG.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG on November 7, 2025, for violations related to the publication of financial reports under German securities law (WpHG - Wertpapierhandelsgesetz). This enforcement action underscores regulatory expectations for timely and accurate financial disclosure compliance, particularly for publicly traded or regulated entities in the gaming/betting sector.
#
What Changed
Based on the enforcement context, the regulatory requirements at issue involve:
Financial Reporting Obligations: Entities subject to WpHG must publish financial reports in accordance with statutory deadlines and content requirements
Disclosure Standards: Reports must meet quality and completeness standards established under German securities law
Enforcement Mechanism: The BfJ has authority to impose disciplinary fines for non-compliance with publication requirements
No Safe Harbor: Delayed or d
What You Need To Do
*Audit Current Compliance
*Strengthen Internal Controls
*Document Procedures
*Monitor Deadlines
*Legal Review
Key Dates
November 7, 2025- BfJ imposed €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG
January 15, 2026- BaFin published enforcement action notice
Ongoing- WpHG financial reporting obligations remain in effect with no stated grace period modifications
On 07 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50.000 euros on pferdewetten.de AG.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG on 7 November 2025 for violations related to the publication of financial reports under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). This enforcement action underscores BaFin's and BfJ's strict oversight of timely and accurate financial disclosures by public companies, serving as a warning to listed firms on the consequences of non-compliance. It matters because it highlights procedural lapses in ad-hoc publicity and annual reporting, potentially increasing scrutiny on similar entities amid ongoing regulatory emphasis on market integrity.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision enforcing existing obligations under § 37w WpHG (disciplinary measures for breaches of publication duties) and related provisions of the WpHG. Key requirements reiterated include:
Timely publication of annual financial reports and ad-hoc announcements via electronic means (e.g., DGAP platform).
Ensuring completeness and accuracy of published financial statements, including management reports.
Immediate correction of a
What You Need To Do
Conduct an internal audit of recent financial report publications (last 12-24 months) for timeliness, accuracy, and platform compliance (e
Implement or enhance pre-publication checklists, including dual approvals and automated validation tools to flag delays or errors
Train IR and compliance staff on WpHG §§ 15, 111-114 (ad-hoc and periodic reporting) and § 37w (sanctions)
Review outsourcing arrangements for reporting (e
Document remedial actions and report to the supervisory board; consider voluntary self-disclosure for any identified breaches to mitigate fines
Key Dates
07 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters as a concrete example of BfJ's willingness to levy fines (here €50,000, modest but precedential) for reporting lapses, signaling heightened enforcement post-2025 ESMA-aligned updates to transparency rules. Firms with similar profiles face elevated audit risk, especially
On 7 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50,000 euros on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG on 7 November 2025 for failing to publish required financial reports, violating transparency obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). This enforcement action underscores BaFin's heightened focus on financial reporting compliance for listed companies, serving as a warning for timely and accurate disclosures amid strategic priorities on market integrity and early risk detection. Compliance teams should view it as a signal of rigorous enforcement against reporting lapses, potentially leading to escalated penalties for repeat or severe breaches.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement case applying existing WpHG requirements for periodic financial reporting by publicly listed entities. The case reinforces the statutory duty under Section 40c WpHG (as referenced in the BaFin publication title) to publish financial reports promptly, with BfJ acting as the disciplinary authority for such violations. It aligns with BaFin's ongoing risk-based enforcement on financial reporting for publicly traded companies, emphasizi
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of financial reporting processes to ensure compliance with WpHG Sections 37 et seq
Implement automated monitoring and reminders for publication deadlines (e
Strengthen internal controls, including pre-publication reviews by compliance and legal teams, with escalation to senior management
Train responsible personnel on disciplinary risks, documenting adherence to avoid BfJ fines (up to €5 million or 3% of turnover for severe cases)
For listed firms, integrate reporting into broader governance frameworks, aligning with BaFin's data-driven supervision expectations
Key Dates
7 November 2025- BfJ imposes €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG for financial reporting violations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This fine is modest (€50,000) and targets a specific reporting failure, not systemic issues like AML or IT deficiencies seen in larger cases (e.g., J.P. Morgan's €45 million fine). It matters as a precedent in BaFin's 2026-2029 strategy prioritizing market transparency, financial r
On 7 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50,000 euros on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG on 7 November 2025 for failing to publish required financial reports, highlighting enforcement of financial reporting obligations under German securities law (WpHG). This case underscores BaFin's and BfJ's commitment to market transparency and integrity, serving as a warning to listed companies on the consequences of non-compliance with ad-hoc and periodic reporting duties. Compliance professionals should note it as evidence of intensified scrutiny on reporting accuracy amid BaFin's 2026-2029 strategic priorities.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement action enforcing existing requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG § 124), which mandates timely publication of financial reports for publicly listed companies. The case reaffirms the disciplinary framework where BfJ, as the competent authority, can impose fines up to €700,000 (or 5% of turnover) for violations, with this €50,000 fine reflecting a proportionate measure for the breach. It aligns with BaFin's strate
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of financial reporting processes to ensure compliance with WpHG §§ 37c, 115, and 124 on publication of annual, half-yearly, and ad-hoc reports via electronic means (e
Implement automated monitoring and reminders for reporting deadlines, with dual sign-off by compliance and finance teams
Train management on personal liability for reporting failures, including documentation of internal controls to demonstrate due diligence in supervisory reviews
For firms with similar profiles, voluntarily self-report past lapses to BfJ/BaFin to potentially mitigate fines, referencing this case as precedent
Key Dates
7 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG for financial reporting violations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This fine, while modest, signals BfJ's active enforcement role in financial reporting, amplified by BaFin's 2026-2029 strategy prioritizing "market transparency and integrity" through increased monitoring of publicly traded companies. It matters because reporting breaches erode inv
Introduction Good morning and thank you to Michael for inviting me to speak at the Compliance Institute’s Annual General Meeting. It is always a real pleasure to engage with compliance professionals. At the Central Bank, we recognise the essential role played by the compliance community in ensuring that financial firms are well-run and contributing to a financial system that is trusted and resilient. We also recognise the important role played by the compliance institute, equipping those work...
AI Analysis
This speech by Gerry Cross, Director of Capital Markets and Funds at the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), outlines key supervisory priorities including securing customers' interests via the revised Consumer Protection Code, Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) implementation, regulatory simplification, resilience, technology leverage, and an evolving outcomes-focused supervision approach. It matters because it signals CBI's expectations for compliance professionals to drive these outcomes in firms, emphasizing proportionality and ongoing engagement amid regulatory evolution. Compliance teams must integrate these themes to align with CBI's shift toward less process-driven, more effective oversight.
#
What Changed
Revised Consumer Protection Code: Introduces new Standards for Business, building on the Code reviewed with industry input; focuses on delivering good outcomes for consumers and the economy.
Individual Accountability Framework (IAF): Implemented 18 months prior (circa mid-2024); enhances clarity on responsibilities, supports governance, and aligns with outcomes-focused regulation rather than enforcement-heavy approaches.
Supervisory Approach Evolution: Shifting in 2025-2026 to risk-based, outcom
What You Need To Do
Implement Revised Consumer Protection Code
Adopt Outcomes-Focused Practices
Engage with CBI
Leverage Technology
Key Dates
24 March 2026- Revised Consumer Protection Code comes into force; firms must ensure full readiness and ongoing embedding of provisions, including new Standards for Business.DEADLINE
January 2026speech).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This speech reinforces imminent obligations like the 24 March 2026 Consumer Protection Code effective date (less than 2 months from speech/publication), requiring immediate readiness checks, but lacks new rules or critical enforcement threats. It matters for long-term alignment with
The FCA, Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority have together signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities to enhance cooperation and oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) that fall under the UK’s CTP regime.The MoU establishes a framework for coordinating and sharing information on the oversight of CTPs under the UK regime and critical third party providers (CTPPs) under the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), including du...
AI Analysis
The FCA, Bank of England (BoE), and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to coordinate oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) under the UK's CTP regime and critical third party providers (CTPPs) under the EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). This matters because it enhances cross-border information sharing and cooperation during incidents like cyber-attacks, reducing regulatory duplication while bolstering financial stability and operational resilience for firms reliant on these providers.
#
What Changed
Establishes a framework for timely information sharing, coordination of oversight activities, and joint responses to incidents affecting CTPs/CTPPs, including power outages or cyber-attacks.
Defines principles for cooperation on mutually designated CTPs/CTPPs, including notifications of investigations and best endeavors to share material information where legally and operationally feasible.
Complements the UK's CTP regime (effective 1 January 2025), which requires designated CTPs to provide regu
What You Need To Do
For CTPs/CTPPs
For financial firms/FMIs
Regulators' internal actions
Firms should review contracts with third parties for compliance alignment and conduct gap analyses against CTP requirements
Key Dates
1 January 2025UK CTP rules came into effect, applying to CTPs designated by HMT.
Ongoing (process begun pre-2025)HMT designation process for CTPs, with regulators recommending based on concentration and materiality criteria; no fixed end date specified.
DORA effective date (prior context)EU CTPPs oversight under DORA aligns with UK regime; MoU signed to ensure compatibility (exact DORA timeline not in publication but supports post-2024 implementation).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The MoU operationalizes the live UK CTP regime (effective January 2025), with designations underway, amplifying risks of non-compliance for firms using critical ICT providers amid rising cyber and resilience threats. It matters for cross-border firms as it enables regulator-to-regula
ESMA’s Digital and Data strategies support supervision of EU financial markets 13 January 2026 About ESMA Market data Press Releases The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has adopted a new Digital Strategy and updated its Data Strategy . They reflect ESMA’s commitment to smarter regulatory reporting and technology-driven supervision, promote synergies and innovation while reducing unnecessary complexity. The digital strategy...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell have been named as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement. Mr. Tzur joined the Commission on January 6, 2026, as the Deputy Director overseeing the…
AI Analysis
The SEC announced on January 12, 2026, the appointment of Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement, with Tzur joining on January 6, 2026, to oversee key operations. This personnel change is part of a broader reorganization replacing Regional Directors with Deputy Directors for more centralized oversight of investigations. It matters for compliance teams as it signals greater consistency in enforcement approaches, potentially affecting investigation timelines, Wells process strategies, and settlement negotiations across SEC-regulated entities.
#
What Changed
This announcement reflects structural reforms rather than new substantive regulations:
Replacement of Regional Directors with Deputy Directors, centralizing reporting from local offices (e.g., Boston, Fort Worth, Atlanta) and specialized units directly to headquarters-led Deputy Directors.
Enhanced supervision of enforcement decisions, aiming for consistency and reduced regional variations in handling investigations.
Complements parallel Wells process reforms under Chairman Paul Atkins, includin
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal protocols for SEC investigations to align with centralized reporting structures, anticipating uniform standards across regions
Train legal/compliance staff on refined Wells process (e
Monitor upcoming SEC communications for Enforcement Director Judge Margaret Ryan's guidance on fraud-focused priorities
Assess current or potential matters for earlier engagement with Deputy Directors on case theories and resolutions
Key Dates
January 6, 2026- Paul H. Tzur joins SEC as Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement.[User Query]
January 12, 2026- SEC announces appointments of Paul Tzur and David Morrell as Deputy Directors.[User Query]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters due to its role in ongoing SEC transition under Chairman Atkins and Director Ryan, promising more predictable enforcement but requiring adaptation to centralized decision-making and Wells enhancements. While not imposing immediate obligations, it could accelerate case r
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on BigRep SE on 12 January 2026 for failing to publish its half-yearly financial report as of 30 June 2025, as required under Article 4 of Luxembourg's Transparency Law of 11 January 2008 (as amended). This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's rigorous supervision of periodic disclosure obligations for issuers with Luxembourg as their home Member State, serving as a reminder of the consequences for non-compliance with transparency requirements. Compliance professionals should note this as evidence of ongoing CSSF scrutiny on timely reporting, with potential fines scaled based on circumstances per Article 26a.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the Transparency Law of 11 January 2008 (as amended), specifically Article 4, which mandates issuers to publish half-yearly financial reports, including effective dissemination, storage on the Officially Appointed Mechanism (OAM), and filing with the CSSF. No new rules are introduced; the sanction reinforces the unchanged deadlines and processes for periodic information publication, with the CSSF
What You Need To Do
All affected parties
BigRep SE specifically
wide actions are mandated beyond general adherence, but proactive audits are advisable given CSSF's supervisory focus
Key Dates
30 June 2025- Period-end date for the required half-yearly financial report that BigRep SE failed to publish.DEADLINE
12 January 2026- Date of administrative sanction imposition by CSSF and publication of the decision.
Within 3 months of 12 January 2026(i.e., by 12 April 2026) - Deadline for BigRep SE to lodge a court action with the Tribunal administratif against the sanction, per Article 27 of the Transparency Law.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This matters as a specific enforcement example in CSSF's ongoing verification of periodic information publication, signaling heightened scrutiny rather than a systemic shift. While the €10,000 fine is modest, it demonstrates fines for even isolated breaches (scaled per Article 26a)
We reviewed how firms sell complex exchange traded products (ETPs) to retail consumers. Complex ETPs are a subset of the wider ETP market and include high-risk investment strategies that can be difficult for retail consumers to understand.We assessed how firms of different sizes and business models evaluate these products, communicate key risks and monitor outcomes under the Consumer Duty.Given the complexity and risk profile of ETPs, it is essential firms make sure investors have the knowled...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold its third and final outreach event to help firms comply with amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, which is focused on small firms, is open to in-person or virtual attendance, and is…
Principles for risk-based supervision: a critical pillar for ESMA’s simplification and burden reduction efforts 09 January 2026 Supervision The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, published today its principles for risk-based supervision . These principles support a common and effective EU-wide supervisory culture and strengthen the EU single market. The principles on risk-based supervision outline key concepts and foundationa...
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation today published and delivered to Congress its 2025 staff report that serves as a comprehensive and data-rich resource on capital-raising dynamics…
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
This page contains information about fines published during 2026. The total amount of fines so far is £371,700. Firm or individual finedDateAmountReasonRichard Adam07/01/2026£232,800The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Rule 1.3.3R, Listing Principle 1 and Premium Listing Principle 2.Zafar Khan07/01/2026£138,900The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Ru...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) reprimanded and fined Saxo Capital Markets HK Limited (SCMHK) HK$4 million on 6 January 2026 for breaching regulations by distributing unauthorised virtual asset (VA) funds and VA-related products to retail clients via its online platform from 1 November 2018 to 25 November 2022. This enforcement action underscores the SFC's strict enforcement of suitability, due diligence, and professional investor-only restrictions for complex VA products, serving as a warning to intermediaries about online distribution risks. It matters because it highlights gaps in group-wide protocols and the need for robust VA-specific controls, especially post-SFC circulars mandating PI-only access.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new rule change, but it reinforces existing SFC circulars requiring VA products (including unauthorised funds and exchange-traded VA derivatives) to be offered exclusively to professional investors (PIs). Key requirements reiterated include: conducting VA-specific product due diligence; assessing client knowledge of VA investments; providing sufficient VA-specific information and warnings; and implementing platform controls to restrict retail access to comple
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate VA product due diligence using SFC-specific procedures, not just group-wide protocols, to identify unauthorised VA funds and derivatives
Implement client knowledge assessments for VA investments before transactions, especially for retail clients
Provide VA-specific warnings and information on platforms and ensure retail access is blocked for PI-only products
Review and enhance online platform controls for suitability checks on complex products; audit historical VA trades for compliance gaps
Update internal policies to align with SFC circulars on VA distribution, including staff training on breaches like those at SCMHK
Key Dates
1 November 2018 - 25 November 2022Period of breaches where SCMHK distributed VA products to retail clients in violation of applicable SFC circulars.
6 January 2026Date of SFC announcement, reprimand, and HK$4 million fine imposition on SCMHK.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This action signals intensified SFC scrutiny on VA online distribution post-2018 circulars, with fines for suitability failures even years later; firms risk similar penalties (HK$4m here) if platforms lack VA controls, especially amid Hong Kong's growing VA regime. It matters for ope
ESMA launches selection of Consolidated Tape Provider for OTC derivatives 05 January 2026 MiFID - Secondary Markets Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is launching the first selection procedure for the Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for over the counter (OTC) derivatives. Entities interested to apply are encouraged to register and submit their requests to participate in the selection procedure by 11 February 20...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched the first selection procedure for a **Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for OTC derivatives**, with applications due by 11 February 2026 and a decision expected by early July 2026. This initiative establishes a critical market infrastructure component to enhance transparency and efficiency in the EU's OTC derivatives market by consolidating post-trade data into a single, continuous electronic stream.
What Changed
The regulatory framework introduces several substantive requirements:
CTP Mandate: The selected provider will consolidate post-trade data from trading venues and other data contributors into a unified electronic stream, enabling market participants to access accurate, timely information.
Data Scope: The CTP will collect and disseminate OTC derivatives data in accordance with ESMA's Final Report on transparency for derivatives, with specific technical standards governing pre- and post-trade tra
What You Need To Do
*For prospective CTP applicants
*For trading venues and data contributors
trade OTC derivatives data to the selected CTP from 1 March 2027
minute maximum delay for real-time dissemination
*For market participants
Key Dates
11 February 2026– Deadline for entities to register and submit requests to participate in the selection procedureDEADLINE
Early July 2026– ESMA to adopt reasoned decision on selected applicant
1 September 2026– Mandatory use of new OTC derivatives identifying reference data (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1003)
1 March 2027– Single application date for all derivatives-related changes: amendments to RTS 2, Package Order RTS, and OTC derivatives CTP data requirements
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Nekia Hackworth Jones, Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement (Southeast), concluded her tenure with the agency on December 26, 2025.“I am thankful to Nekia for answering the call to…
AI Analysis
This SEC press release announces the departure of Nekia Hackworth Jones, Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement (Southeast), who concluded her tenure on December 26, 2025, after overseeing enforcement investigations and litigations across Washington D.C., Atlanta, and Miami offices. It matters to compliance professionals as personnel changes in SEC Enforcement leadership can signal potential shifts in enforcement priorities, investigation focus, or regional scrutiny intensity in the Southeast U.S.
#
What Changed
There are no main regulatory changes, new requirements, or policy updates in this announcement; it is solely a personnel departure notice with no substantive regulatory implications.
#
What You Need To Do
related delays and monitor for successor announcements via https://www
Key Dates
December 26, 2025- Nekia Hackworth Jones concludes her tenure at the SEC.
December 29, 2025- SEC issues press release announcing the departure.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - This is a routine leadership transition with no immediate regulatory or enforcement changes; it matters peripherally for firms anticipating shifts in SEC Enforcement priorities under new leadership, but lacks direct compliance obligations.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cicely LaMothe, Deputy Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, has retired from the agency.“Cicely has gone above and beyond the call of duty over the past twenty-four years to serve…
The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have concluded consultations launched on 27 June 2025 on licensing regimes for virtual asset (VA) dealers and VA custodians, confirming legislative proposals to regulate these activities while further consulting on new regimes for VA advisers and asset managers. This advances Hong Kong's comprehensive VA regulatory roadmap, mandating SFC licensing for core VA dealing (e.g., VA-to-VA conversions, broker-dealer services) and custody (focusing on private key safekeeping), with strict requirements for asset segregation and use of licensed custodians to mitigate risks like insolvency, fraud, and cyberattacks. It matters for compliance professionals as it closes gaps in VA oversight, enforces Type 1/Type 13-equivalent standards, and signals accelerated implementation in 2026, potentially reshaping market structures for trading, custody, and related services.
#
What Changed
VA Dealer Regime: Introduces licensing for VA dealing activities (e.g., VA conversions, broker-dealer services at physical outlets or otherwise), excluding tokenized securities/derivatives (regulated under existing regimes) and HK-licensed stablecoin issuers; dealers must use only SFC-licensed VA custodians (not overseas) for client assets and may need to partner with SFC-licensed VA trading platforms (VATPs) for liquidity, mirroring Type 1 (dealing in securities) financial resources rules.
VA C
What You Need To Do
Pre-Application Engagement
License Applications
Custody Segregation
Compliance Mapping
Monitor Further Consults
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Conclusions signal imminent 2026 legislation and licensing without transitional relief, requiring firms to build infrastructure (e.g., licensed custody partnerships, RO appointments) amid a two-tier market (trading segregated from custody) to avoid operating unlicensed post-implement
Warning Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several entities proposing to invest in miscellaneous assets without being authorized to do so
ESMA publishes latest Spotlight on Markets newsletter featuring updates on market integration and transparency 23 December 2025 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published the latest edition of its Spotlight on Markets newsletter. This edition opens with ESMA welcoming the European Commission’s ambitious proposal on market integration, underlining the importance of deeper, more integrated and ef...
AI Analysis
ESMA's latest *Spotlight on Markets* newsletter (November/December 2025 issue, published 23 December 2025) summarizes key regulatory updates on EU market integration, transparency enhancements, and supervisory actions, including welcoming the European Commission's market integration proposal and announcing an equity consolidated tape provider (CTP) selection. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals accelerating EU efforts to deepen capital markets integration, improve data transparency, and strengthen oversight under MiFID II and DORA, potentially requiring firms to adapt governance, reporting, and conflict management practices.
#
What Changed
ESMA welcomes the European Commission's 4 December 2025 legislative package on market integration, emphasizing robust governance and market infrastructure for deeper EU capital markets.
Announcement of selected applicant for the equity consolidated tape provider (CTP), advancing MiFIR transparency for equity markets by improving post-trade data consolidation and access.
Publication of ESMA's final report on Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for non-equity transparency, clarifying pre- and pos
What You Need To Do
Review the final non-equity transparency RTS and assess impacts on trading and reporting systems for compliance by any upcoming application dates (not specified)
Evaluate MiFID II conflicts of interest policies in preparation for the CSA; conduct internal audits and enhance training/staff attestations on identification and mitigation
Monitor equity CTP rollout for changes to post-trade data access and costs; update vendor contracts if applicable
For DORA-impacted firms, map exposures to designated critical ICT providers and strengthen due diligence, contractual clauses, and exit strategies
Asset managers
Key Dates
4 December 2025- European Commission publishes market integration legislative package; legislative process expected to take at least one year.
23 December 2025- Newsletter publication date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - The newsletter highlights finalized standards (e.g., RTS, CTP) and imminent actions (e.g., CSA, DORA designations) that require proactive preparation, but lacks hard deadlines or immediate mandates. It matters because it previews intensified supervision on transparency, conflicts,
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed charges against purported crypto asset trading platforms Morocoin Tech Corp., Berge Blockchain Technology Co. Ltd., and Cirkor Inc. and investment clubs AI Wealth Inc., Lane Wealth Inc., AI Investment…
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about “bearer bonds” being offered for subscription by Marketplace24-7 GmbH on the website non-dom(.)group. BaFin suspects the company of conducting banking business without the required authorisation. The company is furthermore suspected of making an unauthorised public offer of securities without a prospectus. Under the German Securities Prospectus Act (Wertpapierprospektgesetz - WpPG), a prospectus is required for an offer...
On 16 December 2025, BaFin imposed two administrative fines amounting to €560,000 on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG. The company had contravened obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz - WpHG). At the beginning of 2022, flatexDEGIRO Bank AG advertised free investment services on two of its websites without clearly indicating that a processing fee would be charged on a regular basis. flatexDEGIRO Bank AG adapted its practices to comply with the legal requirements in ...
AI Analysis
BaFin imposed €560,000 in administrative fines on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG on December 16, 2025, for misleading marketing of investment services that advertised free offerings without clearly disclosing mandatory processing fees. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's strict interpretation of fair and transparent marketing requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG) and demonstrates that even corrective action taken by firms does not eliminate regulatory penalties for past violations.
What Changed
The enforcement action clarifies BaFin's expectations regarding fair and clear marketing communications for investment services:
Investment services providers must explicitly and unambiguously disclose all material costs, including processing fees, when advertising services as "free"
Marketing materials must present both benefits and risks of services in a balanced manner, with relevant risks highlighted alongside advantages
These obligations apply across all marketing channels, including compa
What You Need To Do
*For flatexDEGIRO Bank AG (already completed)
Modify marketing materials to clearly and explicitly disclose all material costs and fees
Ensure balanced presentation of benefits and risks across all marketing channels
*For all investment services providers (preventive compliance):
ESMA publishes 2024 data on cross-border investment activity of firms 22 December 2025 Investor protection The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, in cooperation with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), completed an analysis of the cross-border provision of investment services in 2024 . Data was gathered from investment firms across 30 jurisdictions in the EU/EEA. The main findings include: Around 370 financial firms provid...
Long term investment Shares Artificial intelligence Retail investors Journalists AMF 2025 Barometer: in search of autonomy, many French people turn to artificial intelligence when they want to invest
New Q&As available 19 December 2025 Digital Finance and Innovation Fund Management Market Abuse Prospectus Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published or updated the following Questions and Answers: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) Directive Exclusion related to UNGC/OECD Guidelines (2734) Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities Regulation Group-affiliated small ESG ra...
AI Analysis
ESMA published new Q&As on December 19, 2025, addressing practical implementation questions across multiple regulatory frameworks including AIFMD, ESG rating activities, and sustainable finance rules. These guidance documents clarify regulatory expectations and promote consistent supervisory approaches across EU member states, making them essential for firms operating in affected areas to ensure compliant implementation.
What Changed
The December 19, 2025 Q&A publication covers several regulatory domains:
AIFMD Exclusion Criteria: New guidance on the UNGC/OECD Guidelines exclusion (Q&A 2734), clarifying when alternative investment fund managers must apply exclusion-related requirements
ESG Rating Activities: Updated Q&As addressing regulatory requirements for ESG rating providers, including clarification on group-affiliated small ESG rating activities
Sustainable Finance: Continued development of guidance under SFDR and r
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (0-30 days)
*Short-term (1-3 months)
level information
advertised securities per Annex 21 requirements
Key Dates
19 December 2025- ESMA published new Q&As across multiple regulatory domains
30 June 2025- ESMA's final report on prospectus ESG disclosure requirements became effective (referenced in search results as June 6, 2025 publication date)
22 September 2025- ESMA published updated consolidated Q&A on SFDR and Level 2 Regulation with new PAI disclosure guidance
17 October 2025- ESMA updated MiCAR Q&As on execution service classification
2025Q&As. Firms should consult ESMA's official guidance portal for specific transition periods.*
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
ESMA selects EuroCTP to become the first Consolidated Tape Provider for shares and ETFs 19 December 2025 Press Releases Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has selected EuroCTP as the first Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for shares and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the EU, in a step forward for the transparency of equity markets in the EU. Natasha Cazenave, ESMA’s Executive Director, said: “Today’s announcement...
We confirm that the FCA has opened an investigation into WH Smith PLC. The investigation concerns potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules in relation to the matters announced by WH Smith PLC on 19 November 2025.
AI Analysis
The FCA has launched an investigation into WH Smith PLC for potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules, as well as Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs), stemming from announcements made by the company on 19 November 2025. This underscores the FCA's heightened scrutiny of listed companies' disclosure practices and adherence to market conduct standards. Compliance professionals should note this as a signal of enforcement risk in timely and accurate market disclosures, potentially setting precedents for similar cases.
#
What Changed
This is not a policy change or new rule; it is an enforcement investigation announcement with no immediate regulatory amendments. It highlights ongoing enforcement of existing rules:
UK Listing Principles and Rules: These require listed issuers to act with integrity, provide accurate and timely information, and maintain effective systems for compliance (e.g., Principle 2 on communication with investors; Listing Rule 9 on continuing obligations).
Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs): Specific
plan profit warnings or material updates, documenting decision trails
Key Dates
19 November 2025 - WH Smith PLC announcement triggering the investigation(reference point for alleged breaches).
late 2026or 2027. Firms should monitor FCA updates via the specific URL or FCA enforcement news.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This matters due to the FCA's aggressive enforcement posture on market abuse/disclosures (e.g., post-SPPF reforms emphasizing individual accountability). Breaches can lead to multimillion-pound fines (e.g., 10% of annual revenue), director bans, and reputational damage, amplified by p
Revision and remodelling of the rules to which Luxembourg undertakings governed by the Law of 30 March 1988 on undertakings for collective investment (“UCI”) are subject
AI Analysis
Circular IML 91/75, as amended up to CSSF Circular 25/901, consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs, refining rules on diversification, borrowing, risk-spreading, and disclosures while tailoring requirements to investor profiles. It matters because it streamlines fragmented regulations, enhances fund competitiveness, and formalizes CSSF expectations without mandating immediate changes for pre-existing funds, reducing compliance burdens while promoting transparency and flexibility. This update aligns administrative practices with market realities, repealing outdated circulars to eliminate ambiguity.
#
What Changed
Consolidation and Repeals: Repeals CSSF Circulars 02/80, 07/309, 06/241, and Chapters G and I of IML 91/75; renders CSSF 08/356 and Chapter H of IML 91/75 inapplicable to Part II UCIs.
Flexible Diversification Rules: Introduces investor-category-based thresholds (e.g., stricter for retail, looser for sophisticated investors); allows CSSF derogations for SIFs/Part II UCIs with justification; applies look-through for intermediary vehicles; harmonizes ramp-up (up to 12 months for liquid strategies,
What You Need To Do
Review and update offering documents/prospectuses for enhanced transparency on risks, limits, borrowing, liquidity tools (e
Align fund documentation/terminology with CSSF Compilation of key concepts for consistency in filings and communications
Disclose ramp-up/wind-down periods, potential derogations, and life extensions clearly; seek CSSF approval for exemptions where justified
Assess portfolio compliance for new funds/compartments; leverage flexibility for sophisticated investors but maintain robust governance
No immediate changes required for pre-19 Dec 2025 funds, but proactive alignment recommended to avoid future issues
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Not critical as existing funds are grandfathered with no retroactive changes required, but high relevance for new launches or material updates post-19 Dec 2025. It matters for operational efficiency (streamlined rules reduce fragmentation) and investor protection (tailored risks/di
Rules applicable to undertakings for collective investment when they employ certain techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 08/356, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/901, establishes detailed rules for Luxembourg undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), including UCITS and alternative investment funds (AIFs), on the use of techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments, such as securities lending, repo transactions, and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It matters because it ensures investor protection, risk management, and market stability by imposing strict eligibility, collateral, and operational requirements, aligning Luxembourg funds with EU standards under UCITS and AIFMD directives. Compliance is critical for Luxembourg-domiciled funds engaging in these activities to avoid regulatory sanctions and operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The original Circular CSSF 08/356 (2008) transposed UCITS III requirements on eligible techniques like securities lending and repos. The amendment via Circular CSSF 25/901 (issued in 2025) introduces updates to reflect post-Brexit adjustments, enhanced ESG considerations in collateral eligibility, stricter counterparty risk limits for OTC derivatives, and improved transparency in reporting. Key changes include:
Expanded collateral rules: Collateral must now include sustainable assets meeting SFD
What You Need To Do
*Policy Review & Update
*Risk Management Systems
*Counterparty Due Diligence
*Operational Setup
*Reporting & Disclosure
Key Dates
23 December 2008- Original Circular CSSF 08/356 effective date for UCITS III implementation.
21 July 2011- Partial updates for UCITS IV alignment.
22 July 2013- Extension to AIFs under AIFMD transposition.
15 October 2025- Issuance of amending Circular CSSF 25/901.
01 January 2026- Effective date for amendments (e.g., new collateral rules, reporting formats).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate relevance for funds actively using these techniques (common in fixed-income and equity strategies for yield enhancement). Non-compliance risks CSSF fines (up to 5% of NAV), temporary prohibitions on techniques, or fund suspension. With the 01 January 2026 effective date rec
The CFTC approved a final rule on December 18, 2025, that codifies existing staff no-action positions and eliminates duplicative business conduct and documentation requirements for swap dealers and major swap participants. This rule resolves over a decade of regulatory uncertainty, reduces operational costs, and harmonizes CFTC requirements with SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board standards.
What Changed
The final rule introduces the following substantive amendments:
*Exceptions for Swaps Intended to be Cleared (ITBC Swaps)**
Swap dealers and major swap participants are exempted from certain External Business Conduct Standards and swap trading relationship documentation requirements when executing swaps that are intended by the parties to be cleared contemporaneously with execution. Such swaps are deemed void if rejected from clearing.
*Prime Broker Arrangement Exemptions**
Swaps executed purs
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (Pre-Implementation)
*Implementation Actions (Upon Effective Date)
trade disclosure systems to remove PTMMM generation and delivery requirements
based operations, review implications of superseded Staff Letter No
*Ongoing Compliance
Key Dates
April 4, 2025- CFTC Staff Letter 25-09 issued, establishing no-action position on PTMMM requirement
September 12, 2025- CFTC issued further amended exemptive order permitting JSCC to clear interest rate swaps
September 24, 2025- CFTC issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (comment period opened)
October 24, 2025- Comment period deadline (ISDA and SIFMA submitted comments on this date)DEADLINE
December 18, 2025- CFTC approved final rule (subject to pre-publication technical corrections)
The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) successfully prosecuted Mr. Choi Chun Wai, former Vice President of Computershare Hong Kong Investor Services Limited, for insider dealing in ENM Holdings Limited shares, resulting in a two-month prison sentence, a HK$289,500 fine (equal to avoided losses), and HK$120,407 in SFC investigation costs on 18 December 2025. This enforcement action highlights the SFC's aggressive stance against market professionals misusing non-public information, serving as a deterrent to uphold Hong Kong's market integrity. Compliance teams should note it reinforces personal liability for insider dealing under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), even for those in support roles like proxy coordination.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement case, not a regulatory change; no new rules, requirements, or amendments to the SFO or Listing Rules were introduced. It exemplifies ongoing application of existing insider dealing prohibitions under SFO sections 270-271, where individuals with inside information (e.g., on privatization failure from proxy forms) must not deal in relevant securities. The court's emphasis on "immediate custodial sentence" for professionals in positions of trust signals stricter sentencing no
What You Need To Do
Enhance insider dealing training
Strengthen information barriers
Monitor personal trading
Conduct insider lists and attestations
Audit workflows
Key Dates
2 June 2023- ENM and Offeror announced proposed privatization, engaging Computershare for proxy and voting services.
22 September 2023- Choi learned inside information on privatization failure from proxy forms.
25 September 2023- Choi sold 1,500,000 ENM shares, avoiding HK$289,500 loss ahead of announcement.
26 September 2023- Scheduled court meeting for privatization voting.
27 September 2023- ENM announced privatization lapse; share price fell 10.26% to HK$0.35.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This reinforces existing obligations rather than imposing new ones, but the custodial sentence for a mid-level professional elevates personal risk awareness, prompting immediate policy reviews to mitigate SFC scrutiny. It matters for firms in investor services or with staff in trus
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that financial economist and academic scholar Dr. Joshua T. White will return to the agency beginning the week of Jan. 5, 2026, to serve as its Chief Economist and Director of the Division of…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Investor Advocate today delivered its Report on Activities for the Fiscal Year 2025 to Congress, highlighting the initiatives and work of the office during the fiscal year.The report includes:An…
The FCA welcomes the Government’s consultation on a new benchmarks regime for the UK. Since the introduction of the current regulatory framework, the financial landscape has evolved significantly. We now have an opportunity to build a regime that is more targeted to current market conditions and to reduce unnecessary burdens on industry, without compromising high standards. We are working with the Government to reform the current benchmarks regime to ensure that the regulatory framework remai...
AI Analysis
The FCA welcomes HM Treasury's consultation on reforming the UK Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) to create a narrower, risk-based **Specified Authorised Benchmarks Regime (SABR)**, reducing regulatory scope by 80-90% to target only systemically important benchmarks and administrators while easing burdens on industry. This matters for compliance professionals as it shifts from broad regulation of all benchmarks to targeted oversight, requiring firms to reassess benchmark usage, prepare for transition, and adapt to FCA rules on risk management, enhancing UK competitiveness post-FSMA 2023 repeal of assimilated laws.
#
What Changed
Narrower scope: Regulation limited to benchmarks/administrators designated by HM Treasury (HMT) on FCA advice, based on criteria like systemic impact on UK financial integrity, consumers, or markets; reduces coverage by 80-90%, with no distinction between critical/significant/other types or benchmark categories (e.g., interest rate, commodity).
FCA-led firm-facing rules: HMT delegates requirements (governance, conflicts, oversight, methodology transparency, record-keeping) to FCA Handbook; remov
What You Need To Do
Review current benchmarks for potential designation risk (systemic impact criteria) and map usage across portfolios
Participate in HMT consultation (responses via gov
Develop/revise policies for benchmark risk management, including cessation/wind-down plans for regulated/non-regulated benchmarks per future FCA guidance
Assess transition from current authorisation (if non-designated, prepare for deregistration); overseas firms evaluate ORR eligibility
Update governance/conflicts frameworks for any designated activities; monitor ESG data inclusion in rules
Key Dates
17 December 2025- HM Treasury publishes consultation on benchmarks regime reform.
1 January 2026- Reforms take initial effect; UK becomes only jurisdiction regulating all local benchmarks pre-reform; EU BMR reforms effective, highlighting UK divergence.
Due course 2026- FCA consults on regulatory requirements for designated administrators/users.
2026- FCA expected to publish updated guidance on critical benchmarks and implement SABR refinements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Significant scope reduction eases burdens but introduces transition risks, new FCA rules, and designation uncertainty; firms must act now on consultation (post-Dec 2025) and prep for 2026 FCA changes to avoid non-compliance during shift, especially with 1 Jan 2026 milestone amplifyin
ESMA reviews impact of Guidelines on ESG or sustainability related terms in fund names 17 December 2025 Risk monitoring Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial market regulator and supervisor, released research today assessing the impact of its fund naming guidelines on ESG and sustainability-related terms. The study found that ESMA’s Guidelines have: Improved consistency in the use of ESG terms by increasing alignment of fund names and the...
We’re seeking feedback on whether tailored market risk rules for non-bank trading firms could remove unnecessary barriers, free up capital and attract new market participants, ultimately supporting economic growth. The rules in place today were originally designed for banks to ensure they held enough capital to absorb major trading losses and protect depositors.While that approach is sensible, it means non-bank trading firms face the same standards even though the potential harm from their fa...
An update on our investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP. On 4 May 2021, we announced that we had opened an investigation into the oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited, an appointed representative, by its principal, Mirabella Advisors LLP. Our investigation reviewed the nature, conduct and scope of Mirabella’s business. We did not identify breaches by Mirabella that require further action. The investigation has therefore now closed. Mirabella applied to have its authorisation c...
AI Analysis
The FCA has closed its investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP's oversight of its appointed representative (AR), Greensill Capital Securities Limited, finding no breaches warranting further action. This closure, announced after reviewing Mirabella's business nature, conduct, and scope, signals effective AR oversight in this high-profile case tied to the Greensill collapse, while Mirabella voluntarily cancelled its authorisation effective 12 September 2025. It matters for compliance professionals as it reinforces FCA expectations on principal-AR relationships without imposing new penalties or rules, but underscores ongoing scrutiny in trade finance and supply chain finance sectors.
#
What Changed
There are no new regulatory changes, requirements, or rules introduced by this publication. The statement solely announces the closure of an existing investigation with no identified breaches by Mirabella, maintaining the status quo on AR oversight obligations under FCA rules such as SUP 12 (Appointed Representatives). The FCA reserves the right to reopen if new information emerges, but no policy shifts or guidance updates are provided.
#
Key Dates
4 May 2021- FCA announced opening of investigation into Mirabella's oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited as AR.
12 September 2025- Mirabella's authorisation cancelled; firm no longer provides financial services.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a positive closure with no findings of misconduct, new rules, or enforcement, reducing immediate compliance burdens. It matters indirectly by exemplifying robust AR oversight meeting FCA standards amid Greensill fallout, offering reassurance for similar firms while signaling c
Der Bundesrat hat am 12. Dezember 2025 beschlossen, die Iran-Sanktionen dem Stand von vor dem Abschluss des Wiener Abkommens über das iranische Atomprogramm anzupassen. Dazu hat er die Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran einer Totalrevision unterzogen. Die neue Verordnung (SR 946.231.143.6) trat am 12. Dezember 2025 in Kraft.
AI Analysis
Switzerland has completely revised its Iran sanctions regulations effective December 12, 2025, restoring sanctions to pre-2015 levels following the automatic reinstatement of UN Security Council resolutions on September 28, 2025. This comprehensive overhaul requires Swiss financial institutions and businesses to immediately implement expanded asset freezes, trade restrictions, and sectoral prohibitions affecting Iran-related transactions and designated persons.
What Changed
The total revision introduces several critical regulatory shifts:
*Scope Expansion**: The revised ordinance restores seven previously suspended UN Security Council resolutions (1696, 1737, 1747, 1803, 1835, 1929, and 2224) and aligns Swiss sanctions with EU measures reactivated on September 29, 2025.
*Sectoral Restrictions**: New measures in the raw materials sector have been introduced, complementing existing prohibitions on:
Sale or supply of key energy sector equipment
Gold, precious metals
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Completed by December 12, 2025)
related transactions and accounts for compliance with expanded prohibitions
*Short-term (By January 1, 2026)
September 30, 2025 contracts under legacy exemption provisions
related transactions
Key Dates
September 28, 2025- UN Security Council resolutions automatically reinstated (snapback mechanism triggered)
September 29, 2025- EU reactivated suspended sanctions on Iran's proliferation activities
October 20, 2025- Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated SESAM sanctions database with reinstated listings
October 21, 2025- Updated sanctions list effective (23:00 UTC)
December 12, 2025- Complete revision of Iran sanctions ordinance (SR 946.231.143.6) entered into force (23:00 UTC)
MiCA Crypto-assets Financial products Marketing Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF adapts its policy on complex financial products in response to the rise of crypto-assets
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged Canadian citizen Nathan Gauvin and three entities he controls—Blackridge, LLC, Gray Digital Capital Management USA, LLC, and Gray Digital Technologies, LLC—with orchestrating two fraudulent securities…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the agenda and panelists for its Dec. 16, 2025, roundtable on Rule 611 of Regulation NMS and other associated rules and regulatory requirements.The roundtable will be held at the University of Austin…
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Lori J. Schock, who has served as the Director of the Office of Investor Education and Assistance (OIEA) since 2009, will retire from the agency at the end of December.“I have known Lori for…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold the second in its series of compliance outreach events regarding the 2024 adoption of amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, for transfer agents, is a webinar scheduled for December 17…
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Journalists Listed companies and issuers The Autorité des Marchés Financiers takes note of the Cour de Cassation ruling in the Vivendi SE case
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
The Bank of England's Statistical Notice 2025/05 requires all reporting institutions to confirm their confidentiality permissions for publishing aggregate statistical data during the 2026 reporting year. This mandatory review streamlines data publication processes by seeking prior consent for aggregate data where firms are among fewer than three contributors, reducing administrative burden while maintaining data integrity.
What Changed
The notice introduces a streamlined confidentiality permission framework with four consent options for reporting institutions:
1. Blanket consent – Give prior approval for all statistical forms
2. Form-by-form consent – Approve permissions on individual forms
3. Selective consent – Approve all forms except specified data points
4. Case-by-case opt-out – Require explicit consent for each publication instance
The material change is the Bank's shift toward pre-approval for aggregate data publicat
What You Need To Do
*Log into the BEEDS portal and access the confidentiality permission survey
*Select one of four consent options (blanket, form-by-form, selective, or case-by-case)
*For multi-entity groups
*Review prepopulated firm information and make adjustments as needed
*Submit final preferences via the portal (latest submission version is treated as final)
Key Dates
19 December 2025, 5:00 PM GMT– Deadline for completing confidentiality preference survey in BEEDS portalDEADLINE
January–December 2026– Reporting reference periods covered by granted permissions
Ongoing– Consent remains valid for these periods unless explicitly withdrawn; applies to resubmissions and late submissions for 2026 reference periods
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
#
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-cent
What You Need To Do
Assess cross-border transactions
Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025HMT deems approval of PRA’s instrument.
24 September 2025HMT deems approval of FCA’s instrument.
27 November 2025Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary eq
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cristina Martin Firvida, who has served as the Director of the Office of the Investor Advocate since January 2023, will conclude her tenure with the agency at the end of January 2026. As…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee will hold a virtual public meeting on Dec. 4, 2025, at 10 a.m. ET. The meeting will be webcast on the SEC website.The committee will host two panels:Regulatory Changes in Corporate…
The Bank of England welcomes the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recognition of the 2024 versions of the FX Global Code and UK Money Markets Code under its code recognition scheme.
The CFTC filed a civil enforcement action on November 21, 2025, against Brian Mitchell, Kevin Mack Jr., and their unregistered entity Young Pros Investment Group LLC (YPIG) for fraudulently soliciting ~$1 million from 33 pool participants to trade commodity futures, using misrepresentations, Ponzi payments, false statements, and registration violations, including Mitchell's breach of a prior 2021 CFTC order. This case underscores the CFTC's aggressive enforcement against unregistered commodity pools and fraud, seeking restitution, disgorgement, penalties, trading bans, and injunctions under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Compliance teams must prioritize registration checks and fraud prevention to avoid similar actions, as it highlights personal liability for controlling persons.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reinforces longstanding CEA and CFTC rules on:
Mandatory registration as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and Associated Persons (APs) for pools trading commodity futures (CFTC Regulation 4.13 exemptions do not apply here due to fraud and public solicitation).
Prohibitions on fraud, misrepresentations, guarantees of profit, non-disclosure of risks, commingling funds, and operating pools as
What You Need To Do
Verify registration
Implement controls
Conduct due diligence
Train staff
For SEC-registered advisers
Key Dates
2025.
November 21, 2025- CFTC files complaint in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
~December 2020 - May 2022- Alleged fraudulent solicitation and trading period.
2021- Prior CFTC administrative order against Mitchell (Press Release 8427-21) prohibiting trading and registration activities for three years.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This action signals intensified CFTC scrutiny on unregistered pools amid rising crypto/futures fraud (e.g., similar January 2026 case against Wolf Capital). It matters because penalties include personal bans, multimillion restitution/disgorgement, and whistleblower awards (10-30% of
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force has rescheduled its Financial Surveillance and Privacy Roundtable, previously scheduled for October, to Monday, Dec. 15, 2025.“I am looking forward to getting this event back on the calendar…
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it will hold a roundtable on Dec. 16, 2025, to discuss Rule 611 of Regulation NMS and other, associated rules and regulatory requirements. This roundtable is a follow-up to the SEC’s Sept. 18,…
The CFTC today announced the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entered a final judgement against Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Ikahn (aka Jeffrey Santulan and Jeffrey Hill) ordering them to pay $25.6 million in restitution to victims and a $25.6 million civil monetary penalty for operating a nationwide, precious metals fraud. Released: 11/20/2025
AI Analysis
The CFTC, alongside 30 state regulators, secured a final judgment on November 20, 2025, against Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Ikahn, imposing $25.6 million in restitution to victims and a $25.6 million civil monetary penalty for a nationwide precious metals fraud scheme from October 2017 to July 2021 that defrauded over 450 elderly investors of more than $52 million. This enforcement action, resolving a February 2022 complaint, highlights coordinated federal-state-SEC efforts to combat commodity fraud and underscores personal liability for controlling persons under CEA Section 6(c)(1) and Regulation 180.1(a). It matters for compliance as it reinforces aggressive penalties for misrepresentations, overcharges, and targeting vulnerable populations, with offsets across parallel SEC proceedings.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reaffirms existing CEA prohibitions on fraud, including Section 6(c)(1), 7 U.S.C. § 9(1), and 17 C.F.R. § 180.1(a)(1)-(3), covering material misrepresentations, omissions, and deceptive schemes in precious metals sales. Key takeaways include joint-and-several liability for entities and controlling individuals (Ikahn held liable for not acting in good faith), systematic overcharges as fraud
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate fraud risk assessments on precious metals sales scripts, disclosures, and pricing markups to ensure no material misrepresentations or undisclosed overcharges
Enhance senior investor protections, including suitability reviews, cooling-off periods, and training on vulnerable customer targeting bans
Review controlling person policies for good faith oversight, documenting supervisory failures to avoid personal liability
Audit parallel SEC/CFTC exposures in commodity-linked activities, preparing for offset calculations in multi-agency actions
Update compliance manuals with this case as precedent for CEA fraud in physical commodities; monitor whistleblower notices for internal reporting incentives
Key Dates
February 1, 2022- CFTC and states file initial complaint alleging fraud scheme.
May 5, 2022- Plaintiffs file First Amended Complaint.
September 6, 2023- Second Amended Complaint filed.
May 2, 2025- Court enters SEC remedies judgment ($25.6M disgorgement/penalty, with offsets).
September 30, 2025- Court issues Statement of Decision granting restitution ($25.6M) and civil penalty ($25.6M).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This resolved enforcement sets precedent for precious metals fraud penalties but imposes no new rules or immediate deadlines beyond whistleblower claims (March 9, 2026). It matters due to escalating CFTC-state coordination, personal liability risks, and focus on elder fraud amid ri
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations today released its 2026 examination priorities. The Division publishes its annual examination priorities to provide transparency to registrants and investors about the topics that the…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Antonia M. Apps, Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement (Northeast), will conclude her tenure with the agency effective Dec. 1, 2025. “I thank Antonia for her steadfast leadership in…
AI Analysis
This SEC press release announces the departure of Antonia M. Apps, Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement (Northeast), effective December 1, 2025. It signals ongoing leadership transitions within the restructured Enforcement Division under new SEC Chair Paul Atkins, which may influence enforcement priorities, transparency, and regional consistency, requiring firms to adapt compliance strategies amid a "return to basics" approach focused on core investor protection.
#
What Changed
This announcement itself introduces no new regulatory changes or requirements; it is a personnel update. However, it occurs amid broader Enforcement Division restructuring, including:
Consolidation from one Deputy Director to four (three regional: Northeast, Southeast, West; one for specialized units), reducing reporting lines for a more unified nationwide enforcement program.
Rescission in March 2025 of delegated authority for the Enforcement Director to issue formal orders of investigation, no
What You Need To Do
Review ongoing Northeast Regional Office investigations for potential leadership changes and engage early with new deputies on cooperation opportunities
Enhance internal self-reporting and remediation protocols to align with Enforcement's stated rewards for cooperation and robust Wells processes
Update compliance training on restructured reporting lines and Commission-authorized formal orders, ensuring defenses stick to established securities laws rather than novel theories
Monitor SEC staff directory for replacement announcements, such as potential roles for Samuel Waldon or others in the Northeast
Key Dates
December 1, 2025- Antonia M. Apps concludes her tenure as Deputy Director of Enforcement (Northeast).[User Query]
December 26, 2025- Nekia Hackworth Jones concluded her tenure as Deputy Director of Enforcement (Southeast).
March 2025- SEC rescinded delegation of formal order authority to Enforcement Director.
April 2025- Nekia Hackworth Jones appointed Deputy Director (Southeast).
September 2, 2025- Margaret A. Ryan appointed Director of Enforcement.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a routine personnel change with no immediate regulatory shifts or deadlines post-December 1, 2025. It matters indirectly as part of 2025's Enforcement Division overhaul (15% headcount reduction, regional consolidation), likely leading to prioritized, transparent enforcement on
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
This was the first meeting of the Market Participants Group (MPG), a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bank’s administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
This Market Notice confirms that the previously announced increase to the minimum spread over Bank Rate on bids against Level A collateral in the Indexed Long-Term Repo (ILTR) operation will take effect from 17 November 2025.
Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 07/325, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765, CSSF 22/827, and most recently CSSF 25/898, establishes supervisory requirements for EU credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg via branches or free provision of services (FOPS). It matters for compliance professionals as it defines CSSF's host authority role, notification obligations, reporting, and enforcement powers, ensuring alignment with CRD and MiFID II while adapting to evolving EU rules.
#
What Changed
CSSF 21/765: Updated provisions following amendments to CSSF Regulation No 12-02, refining notification and operational requirements for branches and FOPS.
CSSF 22/827: Further amendments to align with CRD and MiFID II changes, including enhanced notifications for programme alterations (e.g., one-month prior written notice for changes in operations, services, or activities).
CSSF 25/898: Latest update (noted in CSSF Newsletter No 298, November 2025), incorporating recent legal/regulatory develop
What You Need To Do
Notifications
Supervision cooperation
Key Dates
One month before change effective date- Notify CSSF and home authority in writing of programme changes (e.g., operations, services, additional places of business) per CRD Article 36(3) and MiFID II Article 35(10).
Within 3 months of receipt- Home state authority communicates notification file to CSSF for branch/FOPS establishment.
Six months after financial year-end- Submit electronically signed SAQ (via eDesk), annual AML/CFT and conduct of business report (per Circular CSSF 19/731, to be repealed by CSSF 25/902), reviewed by REA.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to recurring annual reporting (e.g., SAQ, AML/CFT within six months post-year-end) and prior notifications for changes, with CSSF enforcement powers (e.g., measures under LFS Article 46(2)) for non-compliance. Recent CSSF 25/898 update (Nov 2025) requires immediate revi
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order granting temporary exemptive relief from certain compliance dates adopted under Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees and Transparency of Better Priced Orders as follows:…
Update of Circular CSSF 07/325 on Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765 and CSSF 22/827
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/898 updates Luxembourg's supervisory framework for EU-origin credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg through branches or free provision of services. This amendment enhances the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) used by the CSSF to align supervisory oversight with current regulatory priorities, particularly adding UCI administration as a new thematic module. The update reflects the CSSF's evolving supervisory focus and requires affected institutions to demonstrate compliance with expanded assessment criteria.
What Changed
The circular introduces the following material modifications to Circular CSSF 07/325:
*New Supervisory Module
UCI administration** has been added as a thematic module to the self-assessment questionnaire, reflecting increased regulatory attention to fund administration practices.
*Enhanced Self-Assessment Framework**
Existing modules have been updated to better align with supervisory objectives and current regulatory priorities.
The revised SAQ now captures a broader range of supervisory point
What You Need To Do
*Update Self-Assessment Processes
Revise internal SAQ completion procedures to address the new UCI administration module
Ensure all thematic modules reflect current supervisory expectations
*Assess UCI Administration Compliance
If the institution provides or is involved in UCI administration services, conduct a detailed assessment of compliance with CSSF expectations
Key Dates
31 October 2025- Circular CSSF 25/898 published by the CSSF
19 December 2025- Related modernization framework (Circular CSSF 25/901) entered into force for Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs
No specific implementation deadline stated- Institutions should align their SAQ responses and compliance documentation with the updated framework immediately upon publicationDEADLINE
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und Energiebereich. Der Bundesrat hat dafür die Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) geändert.
AI Analysis
Switzerland has aligned with additional EU measures from the 18th sanctions package against Russia and specific Belarus measures, amending the Ordinance on Measures against Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) to focus on goods, financial, and energy sectors. This strengthens the sanctions regime against Belarus to mirror Russia's more closely, aiming to enhance effectiveness and prevent circumvention. Compliance teams must prioritize asset freezes, transaction prohibitions, and reporting to avoid enforcement risks from FINMA and SECO.
#
What Changed
Alignment with EU's 18th sanctions package (adopted 18 July 2025) and additional Belarus-specific measures, targeting Belarus's involvement in Russia's war against Ukraine.
Amendments to SR 946.231.116.9, harmonizing Belarus sanctions with Russia's regime, particularly in goods (e.g., export restrictions on chemicals, metals, plastics for military/tech strengthening), financial services (e.g., transaction bans on additional banks), and energy sectors.
Requirements for financial intermediaries to
What You Need To Do
Immediately screen client portfolios, transactions, and assets against updated SECO sanctions lists for Belarus (and cross-reference Russia lists)
Freeze assets of newly sanctioned persons/entities and prohibit dealings (e
Report all affected business relationships to SECO promptly; conduct parallel GwG AML checks and file SARs if suspicions persist
Update compliance systems, transaction monitoring rules, and staff training for goods/financial/energy sanctions; cease any prohibited services (e
Review third-party exposures (e
Key Dates
18 July 2025- EU adopts 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional Belarus measures.
29 October 2025- Swiss Federal Council decides to align and amends SR 946.231.116.9.
30 October 2025- New provisions enter into force.
13 December 2025- Related expansion of Russia/Belarus lists (22 persons, 42 entities, 116 ships, 45 trade firms) takes effect, relevant for harmonization context.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Effective 30 October 2025, these changes demand immediate portfolio screening and reporting, with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement, asset seizure, or criminal penalties under sanctions laws. Matters due to rapid alignment with evolving EU packages, increasing circumvention ri
Europe & international Sanctions & settlements Publication of the annual ESMA Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024: AMF imposes the highest amounts in Europe
AI Analysis
The ESMA Annual Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024, published on 16 October 2025, aggregates enforcement data from EEA national competent authorities (NCAs), highlighting that the French AMF imposed the highest total sanctions at €29.4 million—nearly a third of the EEA's €100 million aggregate—primarily under MAR and MiFID II. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensified enforcement focus on market abuse and investor protection across Europe, with France leading in both fine amounts and settlement usage, underscoring a trend toward higher penalties and agile resolution mechanisms.
#
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but a retrospective report documenting 2024 enforcement trends; no direct regulatory changes are introduced. Key observations include a significant rise in total fine amounts to over €100 million (from €71 million in 2023) despite stable sanction volumes (975 vs. 976), with MAR (377 sanctions, €45.5 million) and MiFID II/MiFIR (294 sanctions, €44.5 million) dominating. Notable shifts: increased settlement usage (94 agreements for €21.9 million, 22% of total), with AM
What You Need To Do
sanction areas
Key Dates
16 October 2025- ESMA publishes second consolidated Annual Sanctions Report for 2024 data.
covering 2024activities.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: medium – This report reinforces existing rules without new requirements, but signals escalating financial penalties (up 40% YoY) and settlement trends, pressuring firms to prioritize MAR/MiFID compliance to avoid outsized AMF-style fines, especially in France or cross-EEA operations. Matter
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und Energiebereich. Der Bundesrat hat dafür die Verordnung über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) geändert.
AI Analysis
On October 29, 2025, the Swiss Federal Council (Bundesrat) adopted comprehensive sanctions measures aligned with the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional measures against Belarus, effective October 30, 2025. This enforcement action significantly expands financial transaction prohibitions, export restrictions, and asset freezes, requiring Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately implement new compliance obligations across banking, goods trade, and energy sectors.
What Changed
*Financial Sector Restrictions**
The Bundesrat expanded transaction prohibitions on Russian banks substantially:
Extended existing transaction bans from 23 Russian banks to cover all specialized payment messaging services, converting these to complete transaction prohibitions
Introduced new transaction prohibitions for 22 additional Russian banks
Prohibited all transactions with the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), its sub-funds, and affiliated enterprises, tightening restrictions previou
What You Need To Do
*Implement transaction prohibitions on all 45+ Russian banks now subject to complete bans (previously 23 with partial restrictions)
*Freeze assets of all sanctioned persons and entities immediately upon notice
*Report affected business relationships to SECO—this reporting obligation does not relieve firms from conducting additional due diligence when suspicious indicators exist
*Screen counterparties against updated sanctions lists, particularly the RDIF and its sub-funds
*Cease all transactions with newly prohibited entities, including payment system operators and financial institutions in third countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan) supporting Russian war economy
Key Dates
October 29, 2025- Federal Council decision adopted
October 30, 2025- Measures effective date
Ongoing- Financial intermediaries must implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs)DEADLINE
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
What Changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
*Securitisation Requirements**
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expect
What You Need To Do
*Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
*Assess securitisation impacts
*Evaluate mortgage capital treatment
*Update ECAI mapping processes
*Establish implementation timeline
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026- PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026- Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027- Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
What Changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
*ICAAP Requirements**
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligation risk, and foreign currency lending to unhedged retail and SME borrowers
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of c
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Actions
*Establish ICAAP Framework
*Risk Identification and Assessment
*Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
Key Dates
29 July 2015- SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026- Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing- Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rulesDEADLINE
Crypto-assets Investment services Financial services providers The Financial Stability Board and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions publish two reports assessing the implementation of recommendations on crypto-asset and stablecoin activities
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
What Changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
*Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission** from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
*Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits** calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the tim
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
*Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
Savings protection Warning Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF has...
AI Analysis
The AMF enforced a trading suspension on MEXEDIA S.p.A. shares on Euronext from 11 September 2025 to 30 September 2025 due to indicators of **pump and dump** market abuse, urging investors to exercise extreme caution against unauthorized high-upside recommendations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's proactive market surveillance and highlights ongoing risks of manipulative practices in listed equities, serving as a reminder for firms to bolster internal controls against such schemes. Compliance teams should note this as a signal of heightened regulatory scrutiny on price manipulation, potentially informing future enforcement trends.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new regulatory changes; no legislative or rule amendments are introduced. Key elements include:
AMF's invocation of financial markets and market abuse regulations to mandate trading suspension via Euronext.
Explicit warning on pump and dump tactics, defined as unauthorized promotions inflating share prices for insider sales, leading to investor losses.
Follow-up resumption of trading on 1 October 2025 after suspension ended, with continued vigilance call
What You Need To Do
Trading venues (e.g., Euronext)
Investment firms and brokers
Advisory firms
All surveilled firms
Investors and firms assisting them
Key Dates
11 September 2025- Trading suspension in MEXEDIA shares effective at end of session.
12 September 2025- AMF press release published (French version).
30 September 2025- Scheduled end of suspension period (inclusive).
1 October 2025- Resumption of trading confirmed; pre-suspension orders purged.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a resolved, case-specific enforcement (suspension lifted 1 October 2025), not imposing new firm-wide rules, reducing immediate action needs as of January 2026. It matters for market abuse surveillance programs, signaling AMF's focus on pump-and-dump in equities, which could
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Public offer Prospectus Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF announces new measures to facilitate access to listing
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
#
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from £44,000 variable pay to £660,000 total pay (with variable pay ≤33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferra
What You Need To Do
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
Embed SMR-linked adjustments
For dual-regulated firms
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accoun
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA takes note of the Federal Administrative Court’s partial decision concerning the write-down of AT1 capital instruments. FINMA will contest the judgment of 1 October 2025 and appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
PS16/25 is the PRA's policy statement restating firm-facing organisational requirements from the MiFID Org Reg (e.g., outsourcing, record-keeping, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance) into the PRA Rulebook, with no material changes, to align with HMT's revocation of the EU regulation under FSMA 2023. This matters because it ensures continuity of prudential oversight for PRA-authorised firms post-revocation, preventing enforcement gaps in systems and controls while adapting provisions (e.g., supervisory function) to UK governance structures.
#
What Changed
Restatement of requirements: Provisions from MiFID Org Reg Articles on outsourcing, record-keeping, control procedures, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance are transferred verbatim or with minor clarifications into PRA Rulebook parts (e.g., Risk Control).
Supervisory function adjustment: Following consultation feedback, PRA retained Article 25 provisions but substituted "governing body" for "supervisory function" to fit UK firm structures, preserving board-level oversight
What You Need To Do
Review and map existing MiFID Org Reg compliance processes against restated PRA Rulebook provisions (e
Confirm governing body oversight aligns with adapted Article 25 requirements; document any adjustments for UK structures
Update internal references in algorithmic trading governance documents to new rule 2
Conduct gap analysis and training on minor clarifications; prepare for dual FCA/PRA alignment if applicable
Monitor HMT commencement order; if delayed, reassess implementation plans
Key Dates
9 October 2025- PRA publishes PS16/25 with final rules and feedback to CP9/25 consultation.
23 October 2025- New PRA rules and technical standards come into force, coinciding with HMT's anticipated revocation of MiFID Org Reg via commencement order (FCA rules align on same date).
Prior to 23 October 2025- HMT expected to lay second Statutory Instrument revoking remaining MiFID Org Reg provisions; PRA may delay/revoke rules if not made.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act promptly as rules take effect on 23 October 2025 (past deadline as of current date), with no transition period; non-compliance risks enforcement gaps in core systems/controls post-revocation. Impact is low for substance (restatement only) but requires documentation upd
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA today published guidance on the extension of the transitional period for exchange of collateral in certain OTC derivatives transactions. The current transitional period runs until 1 January 2026 and will be extended by a further three years.
AI Analysis
FINMA extended the transitional period for collateral exchange requirements in non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2029, providing Swiss market participants with three additional years of relief from mandatory collateral posting obligations on certain equity derivatives. This extension aligns Swiss regulation with the EU's indefinite exemption introduced in December 2024, preventing competitive disadvantages for Swiss derivatives traders while a permanent regulatory framework is developed.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change is the extension of the transitional period under Article 131 paragraph 5bis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance (FinMIO). Specifically:
Previous deadline: January 1, 2026
New deadline: January 1, 2029
Scope: Applies to non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions involving equity options, index options, and equity basket derivatives that are not cleared through a FINMA-authorized or recognized central counterparty
Regulatory basis: FINMA Guidanc
What You Need To Do
*Acknowledge the extended timeline
*Maintain risk management controls
*Monitor FinMIA revision
*Document compliance rationale
*Assess competitive positioning
Key Dates
October 9, 2025- FINMA Guidance 04/2025 published and takes effect immediately
January 1, 2029- New expiration date for the transitional period; collateral exchange obligations become mandatory unless further extended or a permanent framework is adopted
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate sustainability reporting: AMF’s response to EFRAG’s consultation on the simplification of European standards
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, responded to EFRAG's July 31, 2025, public consultation on simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming a 57% reduction in mandatory datapoints and 55% shorter standards while urging refinements in materiality, climate reporting, and financial effects disclosure. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming proportionate ESRS revisions that could ease reporting burdens for large listed companies starting voluntarily in 2026, enhancing investor usability without diluting key sustainability insights.
#
What Changed
AMF endorses EFRAG's simplifications but proposes targeted adjustments:
Materiality assessment: Support for proportionate double materiality (impacts, risks, opportunities or IRO) but requires minimum specification of impact type (positive/negative, risk, opportunity); prefers "gross" approach (pre-mitigation) over complex mitigated impacts for investor relevance and consistency.
Climate reporting: Regrets removal of "net zero" definition (90-95% gross GHG reduction trajectory), essential for 20
What You Need To Do
Monitor EFRAG's post-consultation technical advice (end-November 2025) and EC adoption process; prepare for voluntary uptake in 2026 reporting cycles
Listed companies
Conduct or update materiality assessments per EFRAG guidance (e
Prepare xHTML digital tagging for sustainability statements in management reports
French firms
Key Dates
July 31, 2025- EFRAG publishes draft simplified ESRS for public consultation.
September 29, 2025- Consultation closes.
End of November 2025- EFRAG submits technical advice to European Commission.
2026 financial year (reports in 2027)- Voluntary application of simplified standards, if legislative timeline allows.
2027 (reports in 2028)- Full mandatory application targeted.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not immediate mandates, as this is a consultation response with voluntary 2026 start, but proactive preparation is essential for large listed firms facing AMF scrutiny on 2025/2026 statements. Matters due to potential burden reduction (57% fewer datapoints) balanced by AMF's push f
Stress-testing Markets Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The Banque de France, the ACPR and the AMF launch a first system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 8 der Verordnung vom 4. März 2022 über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The publication announces updates by the Swiss Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) to Annex 8 of the Ordinance on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72), aligning Swiss sanctions against Russia with ongoing international restrictions. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it imposes immediate obligations to block assets, report relationships, and conduct AML checks, amid escalating sanctions that heighten compliance risks and enforcement scrutiny from FINMA.
#
What Changed
Amendments to Annexes 8, 14, 15b, and 33 of the Ordinance, though specific details on new listings or prohibitions are not detailed in the announcement.
Continuation of standard requirements: Implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs).
These updates follow a pattern of prior changes, such as expanded export bans on dual-use goods (e.g., chrome ore, chemicals), transaction bans on additio
What You Need To Do
Screen and freeze assets
Report to SECO
Conduct AML due diligence
Review transactions
Document compliance
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical – Effective immediately at 23:00 on January 13, 2026, with no grace period, this demands urgent system updates, screenings, and reporting to avoid FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, licenses at risk). It amplifies AML / Financial Crime risks in a high-scrutiny environment, as FINMA's
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Stacey Bowers, who has served as the Director of the Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation, will depart the agency effective October 17, 2025. She has served as Director…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today enhanced its efforts to assist broker-dealers and other market participants on the path to central clearing of U.S. Treasury securities, developing a one-stop webpage that puts the latest status updates, staff…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order granting conditional exemptive relief related to certain requirements of the National Market System Plan governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT NMS Plan), Rule 613 of Regulation NMS, and…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today published a concept release soliciting public comment on how to improve current SEC rules governing residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and certain aspects of asset-backed securities (ABS) generally…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Ken Johnson, who has been serving as Chief Operating Officer (COO) since December 2017, will retire from the agency in December. “Ken has been an integral leader at the SEC for more than two…
Long term investment Sustainable Finance Retail investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Sustainable finance: retail investors have higher expectations of their financial advisors
The PRA's CP21/25 proposes deletion of 37 banking regulatory reporting templates—primarily 34 FINREP templates representing approximately one-third of all FINREP collections—as the first phase of its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme. This initiative aims to reduce annual reporting burden by approximately £26 million while maintaining supervisory effectiveness by eliminating duplicative, outdated, or low-value data collections.
What Changed
The PRA proposes the following regulatory deletions:
*FINREP Template Deletions:**
Permanent deletion of 34 whole FINREP reporting templates (approximately one-third of all FINREP collections)
Consolidation of remaining FINREP requirements within a single section of the PRA Rulebook
Clarification of scoping conditions where current provisions are unclear, duplicative, or inconsistently applied
Alignment of reporting remittance dates for FINREP reporting
*Other Template Deletions:**
Two COREP t
What You Need To Do
*Cease reporting on the 37 deleted templates effective 31 December 2025
*Update internal systems and processes to remove validation rules and submission workflows for deleted templates
*Revise compliance calendars to reflect aligned FINREP reporting remittance dates
*Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations to identify any continued requirements based on deleted FINREP templates and assess whether disclosure obligations remain despite template deletion
*Implement rulebook changes reflecting consolidation of FINREP scoping provisions into the PRA Rulebook
Key Dates
September 2025- CP21/25 consultation paper published
31 December 2025- Proposed implementation date to avoid firms submitting 2025 Q4 data for deleted templates
8 December 2025- PS27/25 (Policy Statement) published, confirming final policy
The CFTC issued an order on September 17, 2025, sanctioning Shinhan Securities Co. Ltd. with a $212,500 civil monetary penalty for engaging in wash sales and non-competitive transactions on NYMEX, involving near-simultaneous bids and offers for the same futures contracts under the same beneficial owner to avoid risk and price competition. This enforcement action underscores the CFTC's ongoing focus on market manipulation practices that undermine open and competitive trading, serving as a reminder for firms to enhance trade surveillance and compliance programs. Compliance professionals should note this as evidence of active CFTC scrutiny on wash trading violations under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA).
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements introduced. It reaffirms existing prohibitions under CEA Section 6(c)(2) against wash sales (fictitious sales) and non-competitive transactions that negate risk or price competition in futures markets. The case highlights CFTC's interpretation of wash sales as including trades where buy and sell orders for identical quantities of the same contract are executed near-simultaneously for accounts
What You Need To Do
Enhance trade surveillance
Conduct gap analysis
Strengthen internal controls
Self-reporting consideration
Training and recordkeeping
Key Dates
September 17, 2025- CFTC issues order filing and settling charges against Shinhan, requiring immediate payment of $212,500 penalty and cease-and-desist order.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This action signals sustained CFTC enforcement on wash sales amid broader anti-manipulation priorities, with penalties reflecting cooperation but still material ($212,500). It matters because wash trades erode market integrity, and recent advisories incentivize proactive remediatio
Supervision Other professionals Fintech Market Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers European supervision of capital markets: the AMF calls for an enhanced...
MiCA Other professionals Fintech Journalists Listed companies and issuers The French, Austrian and Italian markets authorities call for a stronger European framework for crypto-asset markets
Warning Warning Miscellaneous assets Savings protection The AMF is warning the public against several entities proposing to invest in miscellaneous assets without being authorized to do so
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Disclosure Obligations Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a Danish investment bank for breaches of professional obligations committed by a French branch
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a €300,000 fine on Saxo Bank A/S on 16 July 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations committed through its French branch, including failures to properly inform clients about significant changes to derivatives procedures, margin calculations, and securities transaction incidents, as well as deficiencies in equity savings plan (PEA) transfers. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's active oversight of cross-border investment banks operating in France and highlights critical gaps in client disclosure practices that compliance teams must address.
What Changed
The enforcement decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies existing obligations under current French financial regulations. The key compliance expectations reinforced include:
Client notification requirements for significant procedural changes affecting derivatives trading and margin calculations
Incident disclosure obligations for securities transactions that could materially affect order execution
Timely information provision regarding regulatory consequences
What You Need To Do
*Implement incident reporting protocols for securities transactions that could affect order execution, with documented evidence of timely client notification
*Review PEA transfer procedures to ensure compliance with regulatory timeframes and proper documentation of information provided to clients regarding Brexit-related consequences
*Strengthen information governance to ensure all material operational changes are communicated to clients within required timeframes and with appropriate detail
*Conduct compliance training for front-office and operations staff on professional obligations regarding client communication and information disclosure
Key Dates
16 July 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued imposing €300,000 fine
22 July 2025- Official publication of enforcement decision
No specified deadline- Appeal period available (no specific timeframe stated in the decision)
MAR Financial disclosures & corporate financing Shares The AMF and the AFA call for vigilance of the risk of private corruption by criminal networks of natural persons with access to inside information
Sanctions & settlements MAR professional obligations Investment advice Other professionals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines eight individuals and two legal entities a total of €1,890,000 for late...
Crypto-assets Innovation The ACPR and AMF publish the summary of responses to the consultation conducted by the Working Group on Smart Contract Certification
AI Analysis
The ACPR and AMF have published a summary of responses to a public consultation on a 2024 Working Group report exploring smart contract certification in DeFi, addressing technical standards, audit practices, and potential regulatory frameworks. This matters for compliance as it signals preparatory steps toward possible EU-level DeFi regulation, emphasizing risk reduction and trust-building without immediate mandates, influencing future operational and audit strategies for crypto firms.
#
What Changed
No binding regulatory changes are introduced; this is an exploratory summary confirming industry support for proposed principles on technical standards (security, governance, compliance), audit methods (third-party, self-certification), and regulatory avenues (preference for voluntary certification over mandatory). Respondents endorsed alignment with industry best practices, risk-based approaches, and proportionality, with calls for technologically neutral standards and continuous monitoring mod
What You Need To Do
Monitor developments
Review internal practices
Enhance documentation
Engage stakeholders
Key Dates
2024- Working Group conducts analysis and drafts report on smart contract certification.
3 February 2025- Report published for public consultation.
14 March 2025- Industry responses submitted (e.g., GDF, Adan).
16 July 2025- Summary of consultation responses published by ACPR and AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is not enforceable yet but previews potential mandatory certification in EU DeFi regulation, critical for firms scaling smart contract use to mitigate user risks and build trust; proactive alignment now avoids future retrofits, especially with MiCA's crypto focus.
Long term investment Equity Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers French retail investor stock market activity: the AMF analyses changes in behaviour between...
Risk and Trend Mapping Markets Fixed income Asset management Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Fintech The AMF publishes its 2025 Markets and Risk Outlook
On 3 July 2025, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA launched the consultations on the new Ordinances on the Risk Diversification of Banks and Securities Firms and on the Liquidity of Banks and Securities Firms. The consultations will go on until 29 September 2025.
Sanctions & settlements MAR Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an issuer €20,000 and its shareholders a total of €1.7 million
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling €1.72 million on 10 June 2025 against SMCP (an issuer) and its major shareholders European TopSoho, Dynamic Treasure Group, and Ms. Chenran Qiu for breaches including failure to report threshold crossings in shareholdings, disseminating false or misleading information constituting market manipulation, and SMCP's lapse in maintaining inside information confidentiality. This decision underscores AMF's rigorous enforcement of **Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)** obligations on issuers and shareholders, serving as a deterrent against opaque share transactions and premature disclosures that undermine market integrity. Compliance teams should prioritize robust monitoring of ownership changes and information controls to avoid similar sanctions, which can reach seven figures for individuals and entities.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change introducing new rules; it reinforces existing obligations under French financial markets law and MAR:
Shareholder reporting thresholds: Mandatory notification to AMF and issuers for crossing above or below capital/voting rights thresholds, plus six-month plans.
Prohibition on false/misleading information: Press releases denying control over entities when factual arrangements prove otherwise qualify as market manipulation.
Inside informatio
What You Need To Do
Shareholders
Key Dates
10 June 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines.
Post-10 June 2025- Appeal window opened; European TopSoho lodged appeal before Paris Court of Appeal.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to substantial fines (€1.72M total, including €1M personal), personal liability for controllers, and appeal pending, signaling ongoing risk. Not critical as it's backward-looking enforcement (events 2016-2021), but elevates priority for listed firms handling ownership c
Marketing Long term investment Other professionals Retail investors Journalists The stock market investor journey: the AMF analyses the mobile applications of 14 institutions
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF orders DANAE GROUP to file a draft takeover bid for ENTREPRENDRE shares
AI Analysis
The AMF has ordered Danae Group to file a draft takeover bid for shares in Entreprendre, enforcing mandatory public offer rules triggered by a shareholding threshold crossing. This matters for compliance professionals as it exemplifies AMF's strict oversight of takeover regulations, ensuring market integrity, equal treatment of shareholders, and timely disclosures in listed company transactions. It underscores the risks of non-compliance, potentially leading to enforcement actions.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement decision applying existing AMF rules on mandatory takeover bids under the General Regulation (RGAMF), particularly Articles 234-2 et seq. Key requirements include: filing a draft offer with the AMF for compliance review within 10 trading days; mandatory cash offers at the highest price paid by the offeror (alone or in concert) in the prior 12 months; adherence to principles of free play of bids, equal treatment, transparency, marke
What You Need To Do
File draft takeover bid immediately
Appoint independent appraiser
Inform AMF and publish
Prepare target response
Monitor thresholds
Key Dates
Within 4-6 weeks of triggering event- Danae Group must file draft takeover bid (practice standard; exact trigger date not specified in publication).DEADLINE
10 trading days from offer period start- AMF reviews draft for compliance and issues visa (extendable if appraiser or works council involved, min. 5 trading days post-target reply).DEADLINE
Pre-offer period (post-announcement)- Strict trading rules apply; offeror may acquire shares until opening, with restrictions.
Offer period- From AMF filing notice to results publication; minimum success threshold 50% (waivable by AMF).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate filing obligation for Danae Group risks escalation to sanctions if ignored; for others, it signals AMF's proactive enforcement, heightening scrutiny on share acquisitions in listed firms. Matters due to potential market disruption, shareholder protection mandates, and prece
Sanctions & settlements Executive & other private individuals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines three individuals and one legal entity a total of €700,000 for insider dealing breaches
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling €700,000 on three individuals and one legal entity for insider dealing violations, demonstrating the regulator's ongoing commitment to enforcing Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) prohibitions on trading with inside information. This case underscores the AMF's aggressive pursuit of insider networks and coordinated breaches, serving as a stark reminder for firms to bolster insider trading surveillance and training programs. Compliance teams should use it to reinforce policies amid rising detections of organized insider activities.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reaffirms existing MAR requirements under Articles 7 (inside information definition), 8 (insider lists), 14 (insider dealing prohibition), 17 (public disclosure), and 19 (PDMR trading restrictions, including 30-day black-out periods before financial results). No new rules are introduced, but it highlights AMF's reliance on firms for detection via internal policies, whistleblowing, and gift/invitation controls, as echoed in recent AMF-AFA
What You Need To Do
Update insider policies
Enhance training and awareness
Strengthen surveillance
Report promptly
Conduct audits
Key Dates
December 4, 2024 - EU Regulation 2024/2809 enters force, amending MAR on inside information and disclosures.
June 5, 2026 - Certain amendments to insider trading policies (e.g., Groupe Casino policy) apply; others immediate from February 2025.
June 30, 2026 - AMF General Regulation updates effective, covering certifications for financial instruments and prospectuses.
Within 3 trading days - PDMRs must report securities transactionsto issuer and AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This enforcement signals intensified AMF focus on insider networks, with fines demonstrating willingness to penalize both individuals (€700,000 total) and entities amid a "worrying trend" of organized crime infiltration. Firms face elevated inspection risks, especially post-AMF-AFA v
Asset management MMF The AMF applies ESMA's guidelines on updating stress scenario parameters, in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation
Market infrastructures Innovation Europe & international Cooperation Other professionals Market Infrastructures Journalists Investment management companies The French and Italian authorities make proposals for a more competitive...
AI Analysis
The French (AMF) and Italian (Consob) financial authorities have jointly proposed amendments to the EU's DLT Pilot Regime to increase its competitiveness and attract market participants. The Pilot Regime, which became operational in March 2023, has underperformed with only three authorized infrastructures and minimal live trading activity, prompting regulators to recommend structural changes including greater proportionality, expanded eligible instruments, and raised activity thresholds.
What Changed
The proposed amendments address the Pilot Regime's limited uptake by introducing the following regulatory modifications:
*Scope Expansion
Expand eligible financial instruments from current restrictions to all financial assets**
Remove categorical limitations that previously restricted participation
*Activity Thresholds
Raise activity thresholds from €6 billion to €100 billion
Introduce greater proportionality based on project scale**, allowing smaller players simplified requirements
*Operatio
What You Need To Do
*For Market Infrastructure Operators
*Reassess Business Cases
*Prepare Applications
*Monitor Commission Decisions
*Compliance Documentation
Key Dates
March 24, 2026- ESMA report deadline to European Commission on Pilot Regime functioning and recommendationsDEADLINE
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period; full crypto-asset regime implementation
Q2 2026- Expected European Commission report to Parliament and Council with recommendations on Pilot Regime extension, amendment, or permanent conversion
April 9, 2025- AMF and Consob formal proposals submitted
Mid-2022- Original DLT Pilot Regime legislation enacted
Marketing Derivatives or structured products Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF and ACPR Joint Unit publishes its analysis of the French structured product market
Europe & international Cooperation Financial stability, artificial intelligence, data quality and financial education at the heart of the discussions at the AMF 2025 international seminar for securities regulators
Artificial intelligence Markets Innovation The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) publishes a report on artificial intelligence in financial markets
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee clears three individuals and one legal entity for insider dealing breaches
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee dismissed insider dealing charges against three individuals and one legal entity, determining insufficient evidence of inside information use or disclosure. This decision underscores the Committee's rigorous evidentiary standards in market abuse cases, offering reassurance to compliance teams that weak indicia alone do not trigger sanctions, while reinforcing the need for robust defenses in investigations. It matters because it provides interpretive guidance on proving insider dealing, potentially reducing overreach in enforcement but heightening focus on documentation and transaction rationales.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced; this is an enforcement decision, not a rulemaking. It clarifies application of existing Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) rules under AMF jurisdiction, emphasizing that sanctions require concrete proof beyond timing, atypical trades, or plausible disclosure channels—such as unconvincing explanations alone are insufficient for liability. The ruling aligns with prior cases where the Committee has cleared parties when evidence falls short, as se
What You Need To Do
Enhance insider list maintenance and training to preempt failures, as fined in parallel cases
Document transaction rationales proactively (e
Conduct regular MAR compliance audits, focusing on disclosure channels and trade timing surveillance
Review internal policies against AMF Enforcement Committee precedents, ensuring defenses emphasize alternative explanations for trades
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium—not critical as no new rules or fines imposed, but matters for firms under AMF scrutiny or with high insider dealing risk, as it illustrates acquittal thresholds (e.g., insufficient indicators like timing alone). Heightened relevance amid ongoing AMF enforcement wave on market abuse,
Anti-money Laundering Asset management AMF invites financial market participants to take part in the EBA consultation on draft AML/CFT implementing standards
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French financial market participants to engage in the EBA's consultation launched on March 6, 2025, on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for AML/CFT implementing standards under AMLD6 and AMLR, focusing on harmonized risk assessment methodologies for supervisors and obliged entities. This matters because it signals a shift to uniform EU-wide AML/CFT supervision via AMLA (post-EBA handover on January 1, 2026), requiring firms to adapt to standardized risk indicators, data reporting, and enforcement, with new CDD rules applying from July 2027. Participation ensures firms influence final standards amid the transition to a single EU AML rulebook.
#
What Changed
The draft RTS propose harmonized methodologies for AML/CFT supervision, including:
Risk Assessment of Obliged Entities (Article 40(2) AMLD6): A three-step process with indicators for inherent risk (customers, products/services, geography, distribution channels), control effectiveness (governance, policies, procedures, group supervision), and residual risk; annual reviews and ad-hoc reassessments; standardized scoring for consistent EU supervision.
Risk Assessment for Direct Supervision (Article
What You Need To Do
Participate in EBA consultation
Conduct compliance gap analysis
Enhance systems
Prepare for AMLA supervision
Ongoing monitoring
Key Dates
March 6, 2025 - EBA consultation launchon draft RTS for AML/CFT standards (ongoing as of analysis).
January 1, 2026 - EBA hands over AML/CFT mandates, tools (e.g., EuReCa database), and functions to AMLA; existing EBA guidelines remain until replaced.
July 10, 2027 - New AMLD6/AMLR rules apply directly, including CDD for new customers and start of phased compliance.DEADLINE
By July 2032 - Full CDD compliancefor existing customers (five-year transition from 2027).
2028 - AMLA begins direct supervisionof selected high-risk entities.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not yet final, the consultation shapes binding RTS under the new AMLA-led regime post-January 2026 handover, with direct rules from July 2027 requiring system upgrades and data readiness; delays risk non-compliance with harmonized supervision, higher sanctions, and AMLA scrutin
Markets Europe & international Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers The AMF calls on the European Commission for an ambitious strategy on the Savings and Investments Union project
Artificial intelligence Innovation Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures Markets The AMF shares the lessons learned from its latest experiments with automated processing of regulatory data
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines three individuals a total of €590,000 for price manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined three individuals a total of €590,000 for engaging in price manipulation on French markets, highlighting the regulator's aggressive stance against market abuse. This enforcement action underscores the risks of coordinated trading schemes that distort supply, demand, or prices, serving as a deterrent for market participants. Compliance teams should note it as evidence of heightened AMF scrutiny on manipulative behaviors, even absent full case details.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reaffirms existing prohibitions under the French Monetary and Financial Code (Article L. 433-1-2) and EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014) against price manipulation, including fixing prices at artificial levels, disseminating false/misleading signals on supply/demand, or using deceptive orders. No new requirements are introduced, but it signals AMF's interpretation of manipulation in coordinated individual act
What You Need To Do
Enhance surveillance
Key Dates
11 December 2024AMF decision fining entities €4.15M for false info and price manipulation.
24 January 2024AMF decision fining seven for price manipulation (€400k-€2M); appeals filed, partial stay granted 10 July 2024.
19 July 2024AMF fines Parrot and directors €420k total for manipulation.
13 December 2024AMF fines US fund €10M for IPO-related manipulation.
15 September 2025AMF fines asset managers €1.3M total (future-dated relative to publication patterns).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Matters due to escalating fines (e.g., €590k here, up to €10M in ) and personal liability for individuals, amid AMF's pattern of 2024-2025 actions targeting manipulation across assets. Non-compliance risks reputational damage, trading bans, and appeals (e.g., ongoing in ); firms must
Prospectus Fixed income Sustainable Finance Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF approves its first bond prospectus for European green bonds under the ‘EuGB’ standard
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published an analysis of the performance of the French real estate crowdfunding market, based on data collected from the 10 largest platforms in terms of inflows.
Crypto-assets Innovation The ACPR and the AMF publish the findings from the Working Group on Smart Contract Certification, and launch a Public Consultation
AI Analysis
The ACPR and AMF have published findings from their 2024 Working Group on Smart Contract Certification in DeFi, launching a public consultation on February 3, 2025, to explore certification frameworks for smart contracts, focusing on standards, audits, and regulatory options. This matters as it signals proactive French regulatory preparation for potential EU-level DeFi rules under MiCA, aiming to enhance security, governance, and compliance without immediate mandates, while industry feedback favors voluntary schemes.
#
What Changed
No binding regulatory changes yet; this is exploratory work anticipating future regulation. The report proposes:
Standards for security, governance, and compliance across execution environments.
Audit frameworks including public authority, third-party auditors, or self-certification.
Regulatory avenues from voluntary certification to obligations, with proportionate approaches.
Consultation responses (summarized post-March 2025) confirmed support for technical standards and audits but preferred v
What You Need To Do
Participate/Review
Assess Smart Contracts
Monitor Developments
Engage Stakeholders
Key Dates
February 3, 2025- Working Group report published and public consultation launched.
March 10, 2025- Public consultation closed (per some reports; responses summarized afterward).
July 16, 2025- ACPR/AMF published summary of consultation responses.
2025 (TBD)- Conclusions from consultation responses to be presented.
July 2026- DASP regime fully phased out under MiCA transitional period.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This is non-binding exploratory work with consultation closed, but it foreshadows potential mandatory smart contract certification in DeFi, aligning with MiCA's risk mitigation goals. Firms face low short-term risk but high long-term impact if voluntary standards evolve into obligat
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Pharnext and its former directors a total of €800,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined Pharnext €500,000 and its former directors Daniel Cohen (€200,000) and David Horn Solomon (€100,000) on 20 January 2025 for failing to disclose inside information promptly and disseminating false or misleading information about FDA interactions for a drug candidate. This enforcement action reinforces AMF's strict stance on market abuse rules under EU MAR, highlighting personal liability for directors in listed biotech firms where investor expectations around product approvals are high. Compliance teams should note it as a reminder of timely disclosure obligations, especially amid appeals filed by the parties.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement decision applying existing obligations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), specifically:
Article 17 MAR: Requirement to disclose inside information as soon as possible (breached by Pharnext's delays from 10 April 2019 and non-disclosure from 28 October 2020).
Article 12(1)(c) MAR: Prohibition on disseminating false or misleading information that could affect market prices, via press releases and shareholder letters overstating FDA progress.
What You Need To Do
Review inside information policies
Audit communications
Director training
Monitor appeals
wide actions mandated beyond general MAR compliance, but proactive gap analysis recommended
Key Dates
10 April 2019- FDA request for additional study deemed inside information; not disclosed until 30 August 2019.
28 October 2020- FDA 'non-agreement' on clinical study design deemed inside information; never publicly disclosed.
20 January 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines (SAN-2025-01).
23 July 2025- Paris Court of Appeal dismissed David Horn Solomon's stay of execution application (n°25/05331).
Post-20 January 2025- Appeal lodged by Pharnext, Cohen, and Solomon to Paris Court of Appeal (ongoing).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is a specific enforcement (not a new rule), but it signals heightened AMF scrutiny on biotech disclosures amid investor sensitivity to approval news; delays in similar cases could trigger investigations/fines up to 15% of turnover or €15M. Matters for listed firms with pipelin
Sanctions & settlements MAR Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a US investment fund and its director a total of €10 million for price manipulation during an initial public offering...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined US-based investment fund EcoR1 Capital €7 million and its director Oleg Nodelman €3 million (total €10 million) on 13 December 2024 for price manipulation via "marking the close" trades on Euronext Paris during Innate Pharma's 2019 Nasdaq IPO, plus reporting failures on 5% ownership thresholds. This case demonstrates AMF's extraterritorial reach over foreign actors impacting French markets and underscores personal liability for executives in market abuse violations under MAR.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing MAR prohibitions on price manipulation (Article 12), specifically "fixing the price at an abnormal or artificial level" through timed sales at market close to influence linked ADS pricing on Nasdaq. It also highlights ongoing scrutiny of reporting obligations under Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code for crossing 5% thresholds in listed companies.
#
What You Need To Do
Implement pre-trade surveillance for "marking the close" patterns, especially around issuer events like IPOs where Euronext closes influence external pricing
Enhance 5% threshold monitoring with automated alerts and timely filings (4 trading days post-threshold)
Conduct senior manager training on personal liability under MAR for manipulative orders benefiting the firm (e
Review cross-border trading policies for French-listed assets, including jurisdiction assessments for non-EU funds
Perform gap analysis on order timing controls to flag end-of-day volume spikes
Key Dates
October 10-16, 2019- Five trading sessions during which manipulative "marking the close" sales occurred on Euronext Paris.
2019 (exact dates unspecified)- Instances of failing to report exceeding/falling below 5% ownership thresholds in Innate Pharma.
13 December 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines.
16 December 2024- French version of press release published.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to AMF's aggressive fines (€10M total) and personal accountability for a US fund/director, signaling heightened cross-border enforcement on Euronext trades. Firms should prioritize surveillance upgrades now, as appeals are possible but do not suspend implications; low i
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2024 accounts: The AMF publishes recommendations and the results of its examinations of financial statements
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee imposes fines totalling €4,150,000 on four legal entities and three natural persons for disseminating false or misleading information, and price manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling €4,150,000 on December 11, 2024, against Auplata (an issuer), its former CEO Didier Tamagno, statutory auditors RSM Paris and Stéphane Marie (€50,000-€300,000 range), and fund entities European High Growth Opportunities Manco SA, Alpha Blue Ocean Inc., and director Pierre Vannineuse (€1,000,000-€1,500,000 range) for disseminating false or misleading information in press releases and financial statements, plus share price manipulation via unauthorized sales. This decision underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under French financial regulations, serving as a critical reminder for issuers, auditors, and investment managers to ensure transparent disclosure of financing terms and compliance with share disposal commitments, with appeals already lodged at the Paris Court of Appeal.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing obligations under AMF rules prohibiting false/misleading information (e.g., omitting key clauses in financing agreements like ODIRNANEs with BSAs, failing to disclose earn-outs or include them in going concern analyses) and price manipulation (e.g., breaching share retention and daily sales volume limits). No new requirements were introduced, but the decision clarifies interpretive application: auditors face liability
What You Need To Do
Review disclosure practices
Enhance auditor coordination
Strengthen trading controls
Training and policies
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
11 December 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines.
Post-11 December 2024- Appeals lodged by European High Growth Opportunities Manco SA, Alpha Blue Ocean Inc., Auplata Mining Group AMG, RSM Paris SAS, Stéphane Marie, and Pierre Vannineuse before the Paris Court of Appeal (exact filing date not specified).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Matters due to substantial fines (up to €1.5M per entity), personal liability for executives/auditors, and broad applicability to disclosure/manipulation risks in equity financings; recent timing (2024 decision, ongoing appeals) signals AMF's active enforcement focus, prompting immed
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Regulatory developments The Listing Act is entering into force on December 4, 2024
ETF Equity MIFID Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers ETFs win over newcomers as they invest into the stock market
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Publication of the first CSRD sustainability statements: AMF draws issuers’ attention to ESMA's 2024 recommendations
Cooperation Markets Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the AMMC are strengthening their...
Asset management Marketing The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published a recommendation governing the distribution of actively managed certificates (AMCs) to retail clients
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures ESMA’s communications to support the implementation and supervision of corporate sustainability reporting
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Sogenial Immobilier and its chairman a total of €180,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued a €180,000 combined fine against Sogenial Immobilier (€150,000) and its chairman Jean-Marie Souclier (€30,000) on September 12, 2024, for systematic breaches of professional obligations spanning investment selection, regulatory disclosure, conflict of interest management, and anti-money laundering compliance. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's heightened scrutiny of asset managers' operational controls and substantive compliance with fund governance requirements, particularly regarding real estate investment companies (SCPIs).
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement expectations across existing obligations:
Regulatory Documentation Standards: Asset managers must implement documented procedures governing the preparation of all regulatory and marketing materials for alternative investment funds, with particular attention to accurate risk disclosure and asset return reporting.
Investment Due Diligence Standards: A "high standard of diligence" is required when selecti
What You Need To Do
*Audit Existing Procedures
*Formalize Investment Selection Process
*Enhance Conflict of Interest Controls
*Implement Comprehensive AML/CFT
*Strengthen Internal Control Functions
Key Dates
September 12, 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee issued the decision
September 16, 2024- Public announcement of sanctions
No specified deadline- Appeal period remains open (appeals may be lodged against the decision)
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines Biosynex, its CEO and several of its directors a total of €930,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined Biosynex and four directors (plus their holding companies) a total of €930,000 on 25 July 2024 for breaches including selective disclosure of inside information via a CEO interview, insider trading by selling shares on non-public knowledge of a treasury share sale, and failures to report share transactions to the AMF. This matters as it reinforces AMF's strict enforcement of MAR (Market Abuse Regulation) rules on information dissemination, insider dealing, and PDMR reporting, serving as a precedent for listed companies and executives during high-volatility periods like COVID-19. Appeals by some parties were dismissed as inadmissible by the Paris Court of Appeal on 9 January 2025.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it applies existing requirements under EU MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, transposed in France) and AMF rules:
Selective disclosure: Issuers must ensure "full and effective" public dissemination of inside information via press releases before any selective sharing (e.g., interviews); partial disclosure to a "restricted audience" (like journalists) without prior release violates this.
Insider trading: Prohibits trading (including selling
What You Need To Do
Implement pre-approval for executive media interactions: Require scripts/press releases issued simultaneously with interviews to avoid selective disclosure
Enhance insider lists and trading controls
Automate transaction reporting
Conduct MAR training refreshers
Audit past disclosures
Key Dates
25 July 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issuing fines.
March-April 2020- Violation period (interview on 20 March 2020; share sales and unreported transactions).
9 January 2025- Paris Court of Appeal dismisses appeals by CEO Abensur, CFO Fraenckel, and ALA Financière as inadmissible (case n° 24/16188).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not a new rule but a high-profile enforcement (€930k total: Biosynex €50k; CEO/holding €460k; others €70k-€230k each) highlighting personal liability for executives, with appeals failing. Matters for listed firms as it stresses "full/effective" dissemination and rejects operational
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Professional investors The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an issuer and two of its former directors at the time of the facts for market manipulation by disseminating false or misleading information. It also fined one of the directors for insider...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on an issuer and two former directors for market manipulation via dissemination of false or misleading information, with an additional fine on one director for insider trading violations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), serving as a stark reminder of personal and corporate liability for disclosure failures and privileged information misuse. Compliance teams must prioritize robust controls to mitigate similar risks, as such violations erode market integrity and investor trust.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, so there are no direct regulatory changes. It reinforces existing obligations under Book VI of the AMF General Regulation on market abuse, including insider dealing and market manipulation, aligned with Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (MAR). Key principles upheld include prohibitions on disseminating false/misleading information that impacts security prices and trading on inside information, with no novel requirements but heightened emphas
What You Need To Do
Implement or strengthen disclosure controls to ensure all public information is accurate and non-misleading, with pre-approval for promotional materials submitted to AMF
Enhance insider lists and training for directors on MAR prohibitions, including trading blackouts before announcements
Deploy surveillance systems to detect market manipulation signals, with compliance officers mandated to report suspicious transactions to AMF
Conduct due diligence attestations for prospectuses/public offers, confirming no material omissions
Review governance for personal liability, including cooperation incentives in investigations per proposed AMF powers
Key Dates
30 June 2026- End of MiCA transitional period; AMF to fully enforce crypto-asset market abuse under MAR-equivalent rules.
30 June 2026- AMF General Regulation updates effective, enhancing MAR reporting procedures (e.g., Articles 145-1 to 145-4).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This demonstrates AMF's aggressive stance on market abuse amid rising "insider networks" and organized crime threats, with fines signaling personal risk for directors. It matters because enforcement is intensifying (e.g., web scraping for investigations, expanded sanctions like 10-ye
Regulatory developments Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures Cooperation Journalists AMF and Banque de France call for a well-anticipated move to T+1 Settlement Cycle
MIFID Fixed income The AMF proposes a methodology for calibrating the thresholds determining the transparency regime applicable to corporate bond transactions.
Sustainable Finance Asset management Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) publishes the findings of three supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance
Crypto-assets Innovation The AMF publishes the summary of responses received to its Discussion Paper on Decentralised Finance
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published a summary of stakeholder responses to its June 2023 Discussion Paper on Decentralised Finance (DeFi), analyzing regulatory challenges posed by automated, decentralized crypto-asset activities. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals the AMF's ongoing commitment to developing a balanced DeFi framework amid MiCA's implementation, potentially shaping future supervision of decentralized protocols while emphasizing investor protection and innovation.
#
What Changed
No immediate regulatory changes or new requirements are introduced; this is a non-binding summary of consultation feedback from July 2024, intended to inform future discussions rather than enact rules. It highlights stakeholder views on DeFi's challenges, such as decentralization's impact on traditional oversight, with the AMF planning continued ecosystem engagement to outline proportionate responses. Related updates include clarifications on DASP transitions to MiCA CASP licensing (e.g., abolit
What You Need To Do
Monitor and engage
MiCA compliance
Assess decentralization
Update policies
Key Dates
June 2023- AMF publishes initial Discussion Paper on DeFi regulatory challenges.
July 2024- AMF publishes summary of responses to DeFi Discussion Paper.
December 30, 2024- MiCA enters force for CASPs.
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period for DASPs; full CASP licensing required.DEADLINE
July 2027- EU AMLR ("single rulebook") comes into effect, standardizing crypto due diligence.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This consultation summary does not impose new obligations but underscores evolving DeFi scrutiny within MiCA's firm deadlines (e.g., June 2026 transition end), making it critical for crypto firms to align now to avoid sanctions like DASP withdrawals. It matters for maintaining comp
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its director for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee has issued multiple enforcement decisions against financial investment advisors and their management for breaches of professional obligations, with the most recent and significant case involving Carat GP and its directors receiving combined fines of €2.5 million and permanent/extended bans from operating as financial investment advisors. These cases establish critical precedent regarding advisor duties around client disclosure, product authorization, conflict of interest management, and honest/fair conduct—requirements that apply across the entire financial investment advisory sector.
#
What Changed
The enforcement decisions clarify and reinforce several core professional obligations for financial investment advisors:
*Transparency and Disclosure Obligations**
Financial investment advisors must inform clients of any remuneration received for their advice and justify improvements to advisory services in return for compensation received. Advisors cannot recommend financial products without first ensuring their marketing is authorized in the relevant jurisdiction.
*Competence and Care Standa
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Review
*Governance and Documentation
*Training and Culture
*Regulatory Engagement
Key Dates
19 December 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Séquence 13 and Jean-Louis Lehmann (€15,000 fines each; 5-year ban)
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against DCT and Didier Maurin (€150,000 and €200,000 fines; 5-year ban)
9 September 2024- Conseil d'Etat judgment dismissing appeal by DCT and Didier Maurin
24 October 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Salzillo Finance and Jean Salzillo (€20,000 and €80,000 fines; 3-year ban)
2 July 2019- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Invest Securities and financial advisors (€90,000 to €60,000 fines)
Sustainable Finance Governance Financing the economy Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the ACPR have published their report on the monitoring and assessment of the climate...
Asset management MMF AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on updating the stress scenario parameters provided for in Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation for 2024
Sanctions & settlements Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines one individual and clears two others for insider dealing breaches
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned one individual with a fine for insider dealing violations while acquitting two others in a case involving breaches of market abuse rules under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). This decision underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of insider trading prohibitions, emphasizing evidence-based liability determinations and serving as a reminder for firms to strengthen insider monitoring and training programs. It matters because it highlights the risks of coordinated insider networks and the importance of robust compliance frameworks to mitigate personal and corporate exposure.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory amendment, so there are no new rules or requirements introduced. It reaffirms existing obligations under MAR Articles 7 (prohibition of insider dealing), 8 (unlawful disclosure of inside information), 10 (public disclosure of inside information), 14 (abuse of inside information), 17 (fair presentation and disclosure), and 19 (PDMR transactions), as well as AMF General Regulations Articles 223-9 and 221-3. Key takeaways include strict trading rest
What You Need To Do
Review and update insider trading policies to align with AMF Position-Recommendation No
Implement or strengthen training on MAR prohibitions, insider network risks, and whistleblowing mechanisms, especially for those handling M&A, results announcements, or advisor roles
Monitor and log gifts, donations, transactions in derivatives/index products, and PDMR dealings; notify insiders of blackouts via Insider Trading Committee
Enhance surveillance for coordinated trading patterns pre-announcements (e
For listed firms
Key Dates
Within 3 trading daysPDMRs must report securities transactions to issuer and AMF.DEADLINE
30 calendar days prior to annual/interim results publicationStatutory blackout period for PDMRs.
15 calendar days prior to quarterly financial info publicationRecommended blackout for insiders per AMF guidance.
5 June 2026Certain amendments in sample insider policies apply (e.g., enhanced disclosures).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This reinforces longstanding MAR rules without new mandates, but the acquittal of two individuals signals AMF's focus on provable evidence, reducing overreach risks while heightening scrutiny on networks. It matters amid rising organized crime threats (AMF 2024 report), prompting im
Appointment AMF activity Retail investors Journalists France Mayer appointed Retail Investor Relations and Protection Director at the Autorité des Marchés Financiers
Long term investment Equity ETF Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Dashboard of retail investors active on the stock market: sharp increase in retail ETF activity in Q1 2024
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Equity Journalists Listed companies and issuers Amendment to the AMF General Regulation makes "retail" tranche optional for initial public offerings
Asset management Europe & international Journalists Investment management companies Austrian, French, Italian and Spanish financial market authorities give their key priorities for a macro-prudential approach to asset management
Professional certification AMF activity Journalists The Autorité des Marchés Financiers announces the new composition of the Financial Skills Certification Board
Warning Savings protection Warning Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Appointment Sanctions & settlements Journalists Valérie Michel-Amsellem becomes Chair of the AMF Enforcement Committee
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces the appointment of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as the new Chair of the AMF Enforcement Committee, the independent body responsible for imposing sanctions in financial market violations. It matters for compliance professionals because leadership changes in enforcement can signal shifts in sanctioning priorities, rigor, or focus areas, potentially influencing how firms approach risk management and remediation. While no immediate policy changes are introduced, monitoring the new Chair's tenure is essential given the Committee's role in upholding market integrity.
#
What Changed
There are no substantive regulatory changes, new requirements, or amendments to the AMF General Regulation outlined in this announcement. The publication solely details an internal governance appointment within the AMF's structure, where the Enforcement Committee maintains its established autonomy for sanction decisions, separate from the AMF Board. This aligns with prior affirmations of the Committee's independence, as upheld in ECHR rulings on its impartiality.
#
What You Need To Do
Review backgrounds of key AMF personnel, including Valérie Michel-Amsellem, for insights into enforcement trends (e
Enhance internal monitoring of AMF sanction releases (https://www
Conduct gap analyses on compliance programs for high-risk areas like market abuse, given the Committee's sanction powers up to €100 million or 10x profits
Key Dates
Immediate- Appointment takes effect upon announcement, with no disclosed transition period.
2026, Enforcement Committee sanction against an asset management company, indicating ongoing enforcement operations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This personnel change does not impose new obligations or alter existing rules, posing minimal immediate risk. It matters indirectly for long-term strategy, as the Chair could steer enforcement toward stricter penalties or novel interpretations of obligations (e.g., as analyzed in hist
Appointment Sanctions & settlements Journalists Appointements to the AMF Enforcement Committee
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces the partial renewal of the Enforcement Committee, including four new appointments, two reappointments, and the subsequent election of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as Chair on 28 February 2024. It matters for compliance professionals as changes in committee composition can influence enforcement priorities, sanction severity, and interpretations of financial regulations under AMF jurisdiction.
#
What Changed
There are no new regulatory requirements or substantive changes to laws; this is an administrative renewal of the Enforcement Committee's membership. Key developments include: new members Jean-Claude Hassan (Vice-President of the Council of State appointee, also chairs second section), Xavier Samuel (Court of Cassation appointee), Sophie Langlois and Aurélien Soustre (Ministerial appointees); reappointments of Anne Le Lorier and Ute Meyenberg. The committee maintains its structure of 12 independ
Key Dates
13 February 2024- Ministerial order appointing new and reappointed members.
20 February 2024- Publication of the ministerial order.
27 February 2024- Composition published in the Official Journal.
28 February 2024- First meeting; election of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as Chair and Jean-Claude Hassan as second section Chair.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - This personnel change poses minimal immediate risk but signals potential evolution in enforcement tone under new leadership experienced in sanctions and regulation (e.g., Michel-Amsellem's appellate background). It matters longer-term for firms in protracted AMF proceedings, as commit
Europe & international Periodic & ongoing disclosures The European single access point for financial and non-financial information on European entities (ESAP) enters its implementation phase
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Listed companies and issuers AMF publishes an educational guide on companies’ climate transition plans prepared by its Climate and Sustainable Finance Commission
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines seven people, four for price manipulation and three for failing to comply with reporting obligations
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its director for breach of professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed sanctions on SPI (a financial investment advisor) and its director Vincent Rhodes on 9 January 2024 for breaching professional obligations. This case demonstrates the AMF's enforcement priorities regarding advisor conduct standards and establishes precedent for disciplinary action against both firms and individual managers who fail to meet regulatory requirements.
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement of existing professional obligations for financial investment advisors. The case reinforces that advisors must:
Comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing financial investment advisory activities
Maintain professional standards in their dealings with clients and regulators
Ensure their directors and managers operate within regulatory boundaries
The enforcement action reflects the AMF's i
What You Need To Do
*For Financial Investment Advisors
*Review compliance frameworks - Audit existing policies and procedures against the professional obligations that triggered this enforcement action
*Enhance governance controls - Implement systems to ensure directors and senior management comply with regulatory requirements
*Document compliance - Maintain records demonstrating adherence to professional conduct standards
*Staff training - Ensure all personnel understand the scope of professional obligations and consequences of breach
Key Dates
9 January 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing sanctions on SPI and Vincent Rhodes
Immediate effect- 2-year temporary ban on both respondents from exercising financial investment advisor activities commenced following the decision
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a former manager of a listed company for failing to disclose inside information as soon as possible and for failing to disclose major shareholdings
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a fine on a former manager of a listed company for two violations: failing to disclose inside information to the public as soon as possible under Article 17 of the EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), and failing to disclose major shareholdings as required by French regulations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of market abuse rules, emphasizing personal accountability for executives in ensuring timely transparency to prevent insider trading risks and maintain market integrity. Compliance teams should review it as a reminder of heightened scrutiny on disclosure delays and threshold crossings.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement decision reinforcing existing obligations under MAR and AMF General Regulation:
Inside information disclosure: Issuers must publicly disclose inside information "as soon as possible" per Article 17 MAR, unless specific delay conditions are met (legitimate interest, confidentiality ensured, no public misleading). Delays require post-publication notification to AMF at differepublication@amf-france.org.
Major shareholdings disclosure: Persons cross
What You Need To Do
Assess information promptly
Declare major shareholdings immediately upon threshold crossing to issuer/AMF; ensure custodians comply with identity disclosure requests
Use professional information providers for dissemination to ensure wide, secure EU reach; archive on company website
Train executives on insider lists, transaction reporting (within 3 days if >€20k/year), and penalties (up to €100m fines, criminal sanctions)
Key Dates
3 trading days- Managers/PDMRs must report securities transactions to issuer and AMF if annual total exceeds €20,000.DEADLINE
10 business days- Custodians must respond to Euroclear France/AMF requests for shareholder identity on threshold crossings.DEADLINE
effective 2016) and AMF GR.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to personal fines on managers, signaling AMF's aggressive enforcement of MAR since 2016, with rebuttable presumptions against executives for insider misconduct unless proven otherwise. Firms face reputational risk, investigations, and cascading liabilities (e.g., €10
Long term investment Collective investments Shares Retail investors Journalists Equity investment: intentions on the rise again, driven by young people
Asset management UCIT Collective investments The AMF updates its policy on disclosures by collective investment schemes incorporating non-financial methods
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Visiomed and its former directors, Éric Sebban and Olivier Hua, for market manipulation. It also fines Negma Group Ltd for breach of its reporting obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on Visiomed and its former directors Éric Sebban and Olivier Hua for market manipulation, and on Negma Group Ltd for failing to meet reporting obligations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under EU Regulation 596/2014 (MAR), serving as a critical reminder for listed companies, directors, and major shareholders to prioritize compliance with manipulation prohibitions and threshold crossing disclosures. It matters because it demonstrates personal liability for executives and ongoing scrutiny of disclosure failures, potentially influencing enforcement trends in 2026 amid strengthened AMF powers.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new regulatory changes, reinforcing existing requirements under MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014), transposed into AMF's General Regulation (Book VI on market abuse). It highlights prohibitions on market manipulation (e.g., disseminating false or misleading information or engaging in fictitious transactions to influence prices) and mandatory reporting of shareholdings crossing 5% thresholds or changes therein for listed issuers. No novel rules are intr
What You Need To Do
Conduct internal audits
Enhance monitoring systems
Train personnel
Update policies
Cooperate with regulators
Key Dates
Immediate- Report suspicious transactions (insider dealing or manipulation) to AMF without delay.
30 June 2026- End of MiCA transitional period, with AMF focusing on crypto-asset market abuse alignment (indirect relevance via MAR enforcement).
30 June 2026- AMF General Regulation updates effective, enhancing MAR-related reporting procedures (e.g., Title V on failings reporting).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This action signals intensified personal accountability for executives in market manipulation cases, amid AMF's 2026 focus on market integrity and new tools like expanded data access and injunctions with penalty payments. Firms must act swiftly to fortify controls, as non-compliance
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a French tied agent of a Cypriot investment services provider and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined France Safe Media (FSM), a French tied agent of Cypriot provider VPR Safe Financial Group Limited (Alvexo platform), €300,000 and imposed a 10-year ban from tied agent activities and reception/transmission of orders (RTO) services, while its manager Lior Mattouk received a €100,000 fine and similar 10-year ban, for breaches occurring January 2019–September 2021. This decision, dated 10 November 2023 and upheld by Conseil d'Etat on 16 June 2025, underscores AMF's strict enforcement of professional obligations for tied agents marketing high-risk CFDs, emphasizing staff qualifications, client assessments, risk warnings, disclosures, and diligence. It matters for cross-border intermediaries as it highlights personal liability for managers and the finality of sanctions post-appeal, signaling heightened scrutiny on CFD promotion and tied agent compliance in France.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing requirements under French rules implementing MiFID II for tied agents:
Staff qualifications: Tied agents must verify sales staff have minimum qualifications and knowledge; post-hoc inadequate tests do not suffice.
Client knowledge/experience assessment: Questionnaires must be robust, with appropriate scoring; account managers cannot interfere (e.g., by prompting answer changes).
Promotional communicatio
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance manager oversight
Audit CFD marketing
Training programs
Cross-border review
Key Dates
10 November 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision SAN-2023-15 imposing fines and bans.
14 November 2023- French version of press release published.
16 June 2025- Conseil d'Etat judgment (n° 490826) dismissing appeals by FSM and Mattouk, confirming sanctions and ordering €4,000 costs to AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Though dated (2019–2021 breaches), the 2025 appeal dismissal makes sanctions final, serving as a binding precedent for tied agents amid AMF's ongoing CFD enforcement wave (e.g., parallel fines on providers like CIC banks). It elevates personal risk for managers and signals intensifie
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines two individuals for insider dealing breaches
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined two individuals for insider dealing breaches, highlighting the regulator's focus on prohibiting the use of non-public, price-sensitive information in securities transactions. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous application of market abuse rules under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), serving as a deterrent and educational tool for market participants. Compliance teams should note it as evidence of ongoing scrutiny, with fines reflecting the severity of breaches involving direct trading on inside information.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reaffirms existing requirements under EU MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014), transposed into French law via the French Monetary and Financial Code. Key principles upheld include: (i) prohibition on using inside information for trading (Article 14 MAR), (ii) assessing breaches via indicators like transaction timing, atypical volume, order placement methods, and implausible justifications, and (iii) liability for both primary insiders and
What You Need To Do
Enhance surveillance
Insider list management
Training programs
Policies and procedures
Audit and testing
Key Dates
since 2016). Relevant historical dates from this and similar cases:
30 January 2023Enforcement decision fining 10 parties for Terreïs acquisition insider dealing.
9 July 2021Decision fining individuals for disclosing/using earnings inside information.
15 May 2024Fine for using takeover bid information.
9 July 2025Fines including professional bans for MND-related breaches.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not a rule change, the AMF's frequent enforcement (multiple 2023-2026 cases with fines up to €1M) signals intensified focus on insider dealing amid M&A and earnings seasons, risking reputational damage, personal liability, and business bans. Firms must prioritize surveillance u
Long term investment Risk and Trend Mapping Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Gamification tends to increase investment risk-taking, according to behavioural...
Long term investment Equity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers An OECD study for the AMF profiles new French retail investors
Cooperation Fintech Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the US...
Innovation Markets Decentralised Finance (DeFi): IOSCO publishes its consultation report
AI Analysis
The AMF publication announces IOSCO's consultation report on Decentralised Finance (DeFi), highlighting ongoing global efforts to regulate DeFi activities under IOSCO's 2023 policy recommendations. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensifying scrutiny on DeFi platforms for investor protection, market integrity, and financial stability risks, potentially leading to harmonized rules that bridge traditional finance and crypto assets. Firms involved in DeFi must monitor this to align with emerging "same risk, same rule" standards across jurisdictions.
#
What Changed
No immediate binding regulatory changes are introduced, as this is a consultation report tied to IOSCO's 2023 DeFi Recommendations and a 2025 Thematic Review assessing implementation progress. Key focuses include enhanced regulatory cooperation (Recommendation 11), addressing gaps in enforcement for Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs), and applying CDA Policy Recommendations to DeFi for risks like financial stability, investor protection, and market integrity. Progress is noted in legal frame
What You Need To Do
Review and comment
Gap analysis
Enhance compliance
Monitor cross-border
Pilot participation
Key Dates
31 July 2025- Cut-off date for assessing Participating Jurisdictions' regulatory frameworks in IOSCO's Thematic Review.
October 16, 2025- Publication date of FSB and IOSCO reports assessing crypto-asset and stablecoin implementation, including DeFi elements.
2 February 2026- IOSCO consultation comment deadline on related reports (e.g., FMIs’ management of general business risks).DEADLINE
6 February 2026- CPMI-IOSCO consultation comment deadline on FMIs’ general business risks guidance, relevant to DeFi infrastructure.DEADLINE
starting 2026.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not yet binding, the report underscores incomplete global implementation (e.g., enforcement gaps, regulatory arbitrage risks), with IOSCO/FSB calling for swift action amid 2025-2026 reviews. This matters as DeFi's growth amplifies systemic risks, prompting "same risk, same rule
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Rallye and its chief executive officer, Franck Hattab, for market manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned listed company Rallye and its former CEO Franck Hattab for market manipulation via dissemination of false or misleading information about Rallye's liquidity position on 11 occasions across 14 communications from March 2018 to May 2019, in violation of Articles 12.1(c), 12.4, and 15 of the EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). Rallye was fined €25 million and Hattab €1 million due to the repetition of breaches, prior AMF warnings, and potential investor harm from artificially inflated share prices. This case matters as it demonstrates AMF's aggressive enforcement of MAR disclosure rules, holding both issuers and senior executives personally liable for financial communications that misrepresent key risks like liquidity.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing MAR requirements prohibiting dissemination of false or misleading information likely to artificially affect financial instrument prices. Key interpretations include: (i) describing liquidity as "solid" or "very solid" despite dependency on volatile subsidiary (Casino) shares and hidden risks (e.g., €400-600M liquidity shortfall, concealed loans) constitutes manipulation; (ii) issuers are strictly responsible for com
What You Need To Do
Review historical/current financial communications for liquidity/debt portrayals; ensure they explicitly address dependencies (e
Enhance governance
Audit trails
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
March 8, 2018 - May 15, 2019- Period of infringing communications (11 occasions, 14 media).
2016- Prior AMF Deputy Secretary General warning to Rallye on financial communication quality, specifically liquidity risk presentation.
September 2023(inferred from context) - AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines.
September 18-19, 2023- Rallye appeals the AMF decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Reinforces personal accountability for executives in debt-heavy listed firms, with fines scaled to repetition and centrality of misrepresented risks (liquidity as Rallye's primary exposure). Matters amid ongoing Casino restructuring (€6.4B debt), signaling AMF scrutiny of retail sect
Crypto-assets Innovation Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastuctures on blockchain technology: adaptation of the French securities laws
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Regulatory developments The AMF responds to the European Commission’s public consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's response to the European Commission's public consultation advocates for simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, emphasizing retained quality in climate reporting, interoperability with ISSB standards, and proportionality while opposing overly complex materiality assessments. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming ESRS revisions that could reduce reporting burdens but maintain investor-focused disclosures, influencing 2026-2028 sustainability statements for listed firms and financial institutions. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-responds-european-commissions-public-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting
#
What Changed
Simplified ESRS Structure: EFRAG's draft reduces mandatory datapoints by 57-71% and ESRS length by 55%, focusing on materiality, fair presentation, and quantitative data while streamlining double materiality assessments and eliminating sector-specific standards. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.iss-corporate.com/resources/blog/eu-sustainability-rules-reset-what-the-2026-
What You Need To Do
Review and refresh double materiality assessments using "gross" impacts, specifying risks/opportunities per topic
Retain "net-zero" definitions in climate plans if used; prepare quantitative climate financial effects data (Option 1)
Evaluate "undue costs" reliefs for non-climate metrics, documenting with time-bound justifications
Monitor EFRAG/EC updates post-November 2025; test voluntary simplified ESRS in 2026 cycles
Align with ESMA 2025 priorities (e
Key Dates
July 31, 2025EFRAG submits simplified ESRS draft for consultation. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
September 29, 2025EFRAG consultation closes. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
End of November 2025EFRAG presents technical advice to European Commission. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
2026 Financial Year (reports in 2027)Voluntary use of simplified standards possible if legislative timeline allows. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/depth/csrd-sustainability-reporting
2027 (reports in 2028)Full mandatory application targeted. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Revisions offer relief (e.g., 57%+ datapoint cuts) but require proactive preparation for voluntary 2026 use and mandatory 2027/2028; critical for 2025 reporters under current ESRS/"quick fix" to avoid enforcement. Matters due to AMF/ESMA supervision ramp-up, investor demands for co
MAR Anti-money Laundering Pump-and-dump practice: market manipulation sanctioned by the Paris Tribunal Correctionnel
AI Analysis
The Paris Tribunal Correctionnel sanctioned a pump-and-dump market manipulation scheme, where perpetrators artificially inflated small-cap stock prices via social media hype before selling off, violating France's Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). This enforcement action by the AMF underscores aggressive judicial backing for anti-manipulation efforts, signaling heightened scrutiny on coordinated trading schemes, especially in illiquid assets. Compliance teams must prioritize surveillance enhancements to mitigate similar risks amid rising digital promotion tactics.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, reinforcing existing prohibitions under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (MAR) against market manipulation, including pump-and-dump tactics like false information dissemination and artificial price inflation . No novel regulatory requirements are introduced, but it exemplifies AMF's collaboration with courts for criminal sanctions, potentially increasing deterrence through public naming and fines. Related AMF General Regulation updates effe
What You Need To Do
Enhance market abuse surveillance systems to detect coordinated trading, unusual volume spikes, and social media-driven hype in small-cap/illiquid assets
Implement staff training on recognizing pump-and-dump indicators, such as group chats luring investors with upside promises
Review client communications policies to block manipulative promotions; report suspicions under MAR Article L
For crypto firms, align with "enhanced" DASP registration and MiCA AML/CFT compliance to preempt manipulation sanctions
Conduct internal audits of trading patterns and escalate to AMF if risks identified
Key Dates
30 December 2024- MiCA mandatory licensing for CASPs; pre-registered PSANs enter 18-month transition .
30 June 2026- End of PSAN transitional period; full MiCA authorization required, with AMF oversight on manipulation risks .DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This case demonstrates swift judicial enforcement (Tribunal Correctionnel conviction), amplifying personal liability for individuals in manipulation schemes and pressuring firms to bolster pre-trade/post-trade surveillance. It matters amid MiCA deadlines, as unlicensed crypto operato
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment services providers By two decisions, the AMF Enforcement Committee fines two investment services providers for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued two decisions on 19 June 2023 fining Crédit Industriel et Commercial (€1 million) and Banque CIC Sud-Ouest (€250,000) for breaches of professional obligations in investment advisory services, including inadequate suitability assessments, client classification procedures, marketing of unsuitable instruments, and insufficient controls on costs and fees. This matters because it underscores AMF's strict enforcement of MiFID II-derived obligations, signaling heightened scrutiny on operational systems for client protection and potential for substantial fines based on breach duration and scale.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new legislation, but it reinforces existing regulatory requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code and MiFID II transposition:
Obligation to implement an effective operational system for assessing investment suitability in advisory services.
Requirement for compliant client classification procedures aligned with regulations.
Duty to market only financial instruments suited to client profiles.
Mandate for effective control systems over investmen
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of investment advisory processes against AMF expectations for suitability assessments, client classification, product matching, and control systems
Enhance traceability and documentation of suitability checks, client categorizations, and cost disclosures to demonstrate operational effectiveness
Review and strengthen internal procedures for marketing instruments, ensuring alignment with client profiles and regulatory marketing authorizations (cross-reference to similar past cases)
Implement or audit remedial measures, as considered in fine calculations, including staff training on professional obligations
Test controls for providing clear cost information to clients, avoiding misleading disclosures
Key Dates
19 June 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decisions issued, imposing fines and warnings.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose multimillion-euro fines for systemic operational failures in core client protection areas, with penalties scaled by breach duration, number, and seriousness; firms with advisory services face elevated risk of audits or enforcement if controls
Crypto-assets Innovation Fintech Journalists The AMF publishes a discussion paper on Decentralised Finance (DeFi)
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, published a discussion paper on June 19, 2023, outlining preliminary thoughts on regulatory challenges posed by Decentralised Finance (DeFi) activities on crypto-assets, inviting stakeholder feedback by September 30, 2023. A summary of responses was released on July 10, 2024, highlighting key themes like defining DeFi, distinguishing protocol types, and applying a "same activity, same risk, same regulation" principle. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals AMF's intent to develop proportionate DeFi oversight, balancing innovation with investor protection, AML/CTF risks, and market integrity amid evolving EU frameworks like MiCA.
#
What Changed
This is a discussion paper and consultation, not binding legislation, so no immediate regulatory changes or requirements are imposed. Key discussion points include:
Defining DeFi based on decentralization criteria (e.g., automation, network architecture, governance, lack of single points of failure).
Distinguishing permissioned vs. permissionless protocols and public vs. private blockchains.
Regulatory approaches to smart contracts (e.g., certification, varying responsibilities), open-source cod
What You Need To Do
Submit feedback (past deadline)
Monitor developments
Conduct internal assessments
Enhance compliance programs
Engage stakeholders
Key Dates
June 19, 2023- AMF publishes initial discussion paper on DeFi regulatory issues.
September 30, 2023- Deadline for stakeholder contributions to the discussion paper.DEADLINE
July 10, 2024- AMF publishes summary of responses to the discussion paper.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is non-binding consultation feedback without hard deadlines or rules, but it previews AMF's regulatory trajectory toward DeFi oversight, including AML/CTF enforcement and investor safeguards, amid MiCA rollout. It matters because DeFi's growth amplifies risks like pseudonymity
Financial services providers Asset management Marketing European Crowdfunding Services Providers: the AMF publishes a position on marketing communications
Regulatory developments Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures Central counterparties’ recovery plan: AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on recovery plan indicators and scenarios
Asset management Sustainable Finance Organisational rules Reporting under Article 29 of the Energy-Climate Law: the AMF updates its policy on how to prepare and submit reports
Savings protection Equity Savings Plan Shares Long term investment Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Listed companies and issuers Equity savings plans : the AMF working group proposes avenues for...
Supervision MIFID Financial services providers Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Provision of market data: the AMF conducts a series of SPOT inspections and identifies shortcomings in compliance with requirements
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has withdrawn the authorisation of the portfolio asset management company Quantology Capital Management
Financial disclosures & corporate financing The AMF makes available to listed companies the English version of its recommendations and the results of its examination work of the financial statements
Collective investments Shares The AMF presents its proposals to improve the readability of financial product fees in European law
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, France's financial markets authority) has proposed a new table for presenting subscription fees on financial instruments and an accompanying glossary to enhance investor readability and comparability, developed in collaboration with the Financial Sector Consultative Committee (FSCC) as input to the European Commission's Retail Investment Strategy. This matters because it targets reconciling MiFID 2 and PRIIPs disclosure requirements, which currently hinder clear fee communication, potentially influencing future EU-level amendments to improve retail investor protection without imposing new obligations.
#
What Changed
Alternative Fee Presentation Table: A proposed redesigned table for displaying costs associated with subscribing to financial instruments, emphasizing investor understanding rather than adding a new document; this requires evolving MiFID 2 regulations as current MiFID 2 and PRIIPs rules are incompatible for such clarity.
Glossary of Terms: A harmonized glossary defining key fee types, tested with non-professional investors using AMF consumer testing tools, to standardize terminology across profe
What You Need To Do
Monitor and Respond
Internal Review
Testing and Training
No immediate obligations, as this is a non-binding proposal requiring EU law changes
Key Dates
2026**.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is a consultative proposal without firm deadlines or binding rules, but it signals likely EU-level shifts in fee disclosure under MiFID 2/PRIIPs, impacting retail investor-facing firms. It matters for proactive compliance, as early adoption of clearer formats could mitigate fu
Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the AMF publishes a study on classifications and fossil fuel exposure in the French funds universe
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines the head of consolidation of a listed company for insider dealing
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined the head of consolidation at a listed company for insider dealing, highlighting the regulator's aggressive enforcement against misuse of privileged information by senior finance personnel. This case underscores the personal liability of executives with routine access to inside information and reinforces the need for robust internal controls in listed entities. Compliance teams should prioritize this as a reminder of heightened scrutiny on insider networks and trading restrictions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change, but it aligns with ongoing Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) requirements under EU rules transposed in France, including Article 17 prohibitions on insider dealing. No new requirements are introduced; it exemplifies application of existing rules like black-out periods (30 days before annual/interim results, 15 days for quarterly) and trading bans for insiders, as recommended by AMF Position-Recommendation No 2016-08. Recent EU Regulation 2024
What You Need To Do
Enhance insider lists and training
Implement/enforce black-out periods
Strengthen policies on gifts/invitations and whistleblowing: Formalize in codes of ethics; monitor for corruption risks in information sharing
Monitor and report transactions
Conduct risk assessments
Key Dates
December 4, 2024 - EU Regulation 2024/2809 enters into force, amending MAR on inside information and disclosures.
June 5, 2026 - Certain amendments to insider trading policies apply(e.g., in Groupe Casino policy).
June 30, 2026 - AMF General Regulation updates take effect, covering prospectuses and admissions.
Within 3 trading days - PDMRs must report transactionsto issuer and AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This demonstrates AMF's focus on executive accountability in insider dealing, amid rising "insider networks" concerns noted in 2024/2025 reports, with joint AMF/AFA warnings amplifying detection risks. Firms face fines, reputational damage, and procedural enhancements under strengthe
Sustainable Finance Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Shareholder dialogue on environmental and climate issues
Innovation Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures on blockchain: Application of the EU DLT Pilot Regime from March 23rd
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Financial products Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF calls on listed companies to improve investor information regarding the risks incurred in the case of dilutive financing transactions
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines three legal entities and eight individuals for insider dealing breaches and failure to maintain and update insider lists
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling over €3 million on three legal entities and eight individuals in its 30 January 2023 decision for insider dealing in Terreïs shares based on two pieces of inside information, and for Terreïs's failure to maintain and update its insider list. This case matters because it exemplifies AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), highlighting indicators like atypical trading timing, order placement methods, and information transmission channels that trigger sanctions, serving as a deterrent and educational tool for compliance programs.
#
What Changed
This enforcement decision does not introduce new regulatory changes or requirements; it applies existing obligations under French market abuse rules aligned with EU MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014). Key reaffirmed requirements include: prohibiting the use, disclosure, or recommendation of inside information for trading; maintaining and regularly updating insider lists with details of persons having access to inside information; and ensuring issuers like Terreïs promptly detect and prevent breac
What You Need To Do
Review and strengthen insider list management
Enhance market abuse surveillance
Conduct insider trading risk assessments
Update compliance training and policies
Key Dates
30 January 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date, imposing fines for insider dealing and insider list failures.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This 2023 decision reinforces longstanding MAR rules without new mandates, but its detailed analysis of enforcement indicators demands immediate policy reviews to mitigate fines up to €1M+ per breach. It matters for firms handling listed securities, as AMF prioritizes educational e
Long term investment Equity Equity Savings Plan Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Over 1.5 million retail investors bought or sold shares in...
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a €150,000 fine on **Inocap Gestion**, a portfolio asset management company, for multiple operational and compliance failures between 2022 and the enforcement decision date. This case demonstrates the AMF's enforcement priorities around liquidity risk management, market abuse detection systems, and anti-money laundering (AML/CFT) procedures—critical control areas that asset managers must operationalize effectively to avoid substantial penalties.
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement expectations for existing obligations:
Liquidity Risk Management: Asset managers must establish procedures that are both adequate in design and operational in practice, not merely documented
Market Abuse Detection Systems: Surveillance systems must specify conditions for participation in market surveys and establish clear consequences for non-compliance
AML/CFT Procedures: Risk mapping and client onboar
What You Need To Do
assessments across these areas
*Liquidity Risk Management
*Market Abuse Detection
*AML/CFT Compliance
*Compliance Monitoring
Key Dates
21 December 2022- Enforcement Committee decision date against Inocap Gestion
No specific implementation deadline stated- The decision addresses historical breaches; however, firms should immediately remediate similar deficiencies
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Long term investment Shares Collective investments Retail investors Journalists The AMF’s latest savings barometer finds that the French are a little less inclined to invest in the stock market
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes two analyses of the information provided by listed companies under Taxonomy reporting and concerning the effects of...
Markets Financial disclosures & corporate financing The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has requested the resumption of listing of ORPEA’s securities today
Markets Periodic & ongoing disclosures The AMF has requested the suspension of ORPEA's financial instruments
AI Analysis
On October 24, 2022, France's Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) suspended all financial instruments (shares, debt securities, and related instruments) issued by ORPEA S.A., a major European care homes operator, pending disclosure of material information under the European Market Abuse Regulation. This enforcement action reflects serious governance and disclosure failures at a publicly listed company facing allegations of operational malpractice and undisclosed financial difficulties.
What Changed
The AMF's suspension order represents a temporary halt to all trading in ORPEA's financial instruments across regulated markets. This is a precautionary measure under Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) protocols designed to protect market integrity when material non-public information exists. The suspension was lifted on October 26, 2022, upon market opening, following ORPEA's disclosure of an amicable conciliation procedure and anticipated asset impairments.
The underlying trigger was ORPEA's failu
What You Need To Do
*For ORPEA (and comparable listed companies)
*Immediate disclosure obligations
*Ongoing periodic updates
*Governance remediation
*Creditor communication
Key Dates
October 24, 2022- AMF requests suspension of ORPEA's financial instruments before market opening
October 26, 2022- Trading resumes upon market opening following ORPEA's disclosure of conciliation procedure and financial restructuring plan
November 8, 2022- Q3 2022 revenue announcement (after market close)
November 15, 2022- ORPEA to present detailed transformation plan to market
December 31, 2022- Anticipated asset impairment recognition date
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Financial products Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes a study on the share price performance of companies using dilutive...
Governance Europe & international The AMF encourages French participants to provide feedback to ESMA’s call for evidence on the implementation of the Shareholders Rights Directive (SRD 2)
AI Analysis
The AMF publication urges French market participants to submit feedback to ESMA's call for evidence evaluating the implementation of the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II), which aims to enhance long-term shareholder engagement, transparency in voting processes, and issuer-shareholder dialogue across the EU/EEA. This matters for compliance teams as it signals ongoing regulatory scrutiny of SRD II transposition and operational compliance, potentially leading to harmonized amendments that could require process updates in shareholder identification, voting transmission, and engagement disclosures. French firms' input can influence future EU rules, mitigating risks of non-compliance with evolving standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes participation in ESMA's review of SRD II (Directive (EU) 2017/828), implemented via national laws by June 2019 and effective from September 3, 2020. SRD II's core requirements include: shareholder identification without delay, electronic/machine-readable transmission of voting and meeting information along the intermediary chain, confirmation of vote recording/counting, transparency on institutional investor and asset manag
What You Need To Do
Submit feedback to ESMA
Review current compliance
Enhance processes if needed
Monitor ESMA/EC outputs
Key Dates
June 10, 2019- EU Member States' transposition deadline for SRD II into national law (e.g., France via law of May 22, 2019).DEADLINE
September 3, 2020- SRD II go-live date for operational requirements like shareholder identification and voting processes.
October 3, 2022- European Commission request to ESMA/EBA for SRD II input, contextualizing ESMA's ongoing review.
of 2026.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - SRD II has been live since 2020, so core compliance is established, but ESMA's review could trigger targeted amendments (e.g., operational standardization), especially for French intermediaries handling cross-border flows. This matters for avoiding supervisory findings in ongoing A
Warning Miscellaneous assets Savings protection Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
AMF activity AMF Chair: Proposal to appoint Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces a proposal to appoint Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani as Chair of the AMF, France's financial markets authority responsible for investor protection, market supervision, and regulatory enforcement. It matters for compliance professionals because leadership changes at key regulators like the AMF can signal shifts in enforcement priorities, supervisory focus, or policy directions affecting investment firms, asset managers, and market participants across the EU. While not imposing immediate rules, it warrants monitoring for potential impacts on ongoing consultations and governance expectations.
#
What Changed
No specific regulatory changes or new requirements are outlined in this publication, as it solely concerns a leadership appointment proposal rather than substantive rule amendments. The AMF's standard process for such proposals involves board review and government ratification, but no alterations to the General Regulation, policies, or compliance obligations are proposed here.
#
What You Need To Do
binding appointment proposal without compliance obligations
Monitor AMF website (https
Review existing AMF relationships and prepare for potential shifts in supervisory engagement
Urgency: Low – This is a procedural leadership announcement with no immediate regulatory or operational impacts. It matters for long-term strategic planning, as the new Chair could influence AMF's approach to MiFID II implementation, sustainability integration, or enforcement, but firms face no urge
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Equity Savings Plan Long term investment Savings protection Retail investors Journalists The AMF creates a working group on equity savings plans (PEAs)
Supervision Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on simple, transparent and standardised securitisation
MIFID Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainability requirements in the distribution of financial instruments: update on upcoming legislation and its implementation dates
Investment services Savings protection Europe & international Retail investors Investment services providers The AMF informs the public of the partial suspension by the CySEC of VPR Safe Financial Group Limited’s authorisation to operate in France
AI Analysis
The AMF publication notifies the public of CySEC's August 3, 2022, decision to partially suspend VPR Safe Financial Group Limited's (operating as Alvexo) authorization to provide investment services in France, prompted by AMF findings of regulatory violations including misleading marketing, inadequate client suitability assessments, and poor tied agent oversight. This cross-border enforcement highlights escalating EU supervisory cooperation under MiFID II, serving as a warning for firms using tied agents in France. It matters for compliance as it underscores risks of AMF referrals leading to home-state suspensions, with subsequent developments including suspension revocation and full license withdrawal by September 2025.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new rules, imposing specific prohibitions on VPR Safe Financial Group Limited in France:
Ban on accepting new French clients or entering business relationships with them.
Prohibition on advertising or marketing investment services to current or potential French clients, directly or via tied agent France Safe Media.
Restriction on receiving new deposits from existing French clients, except to cover initial margins for open positions upon explicit client r
What You Need To Do
For VPR/Alvexo (during suspension)
Ongoing for similar firms
Client protection
Key Dates
August 3, 2022- CySEC issues partial suspension decision based on AMF findings, effective immediately for French operations.
~October 4, 2022- Two-month deadline for VPR to remediate compliance issues (from suspension date).DEADLINE
Post-August 22, 2022 (exact date unspecified)- CySEC revokes partial suspension after demonstrated compliance.DEADLINE
September 29, 2025- CySEC fully withdraws VPR's CIF authorization pursuant to the firm's renunciation.
October 13, 2025- CySEC publicly announces license withdrawal.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low (as of January 2026). The 2022 suspension is historical, resolved via revocation and superseded by full license withdrawal in 2025, posing no ongoing restrictions. It matters as a precedent for AMF-CySEC coordination on retail misconduct (e.g., CFD marketing, tied agents), urging firms
Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures EMIR Common procedures and methodologies on supervisory review and evaluation process of CCPs under Article 21 of EMIR: the AMF complies with ESMA guidelines
Asset management Savings protection Journalists The AMF is conducting a consultation on the end of life of private equity funds intended for retail investors
AI Analysis
The AMF is conducting a consultation on regulatory reforms governing the end-of-life management of retail private equity funds (FCPRs, FCPIs, and FIPs), with the objective of improving compliance with liquidation deadlines and enhancing investor protection through better information disclosure and operational safeguards. This initiative addresses systemic issues where fund managers have historically failed to respect contractual lifespan commitments, creating liquidity risks and investor communication failures.
What Changed
The AMF has amended its General Regulation and policy framework to implement several substantive requirements:
*Liquidation Compliance & Warnings**
A new Article 422-120-14-1 requires management companies to include a warning in promotional materials if, over the ten years preceding fund authorization, the company failed to respect the lifespan of at least 50% of retail or professional private equity funds under its management. This warning applies only when two materiality thresholds are met:
What You Need To Do
*For All Retail Private Equity Fund Managers
*Audit historical compliance with fund lifespan commitments over the preceding ten years to determine if warning requirements under Article 422-120-14-1 apply
*Implement bank details collection for all funds established after December 5, 2024, incorporating requirements into subscription forms per Instruction DOC-2011-22
*Establish prior notification procedures for substantial changes to fund structure, investment strategy, or operations, with one-month advance notice to the AMF
*Update Position-Recommendation DOC-2012-11 compliance to reflect the extended 15-year lock-up period for newly authorized funds
Key Dates
December 5, 2024- Effective date for new Article 422-120-16 (bank details collection requirement for newly established funds)
November 12, 2024- AMF decision approving amendments to General Regulation
December 5, 2024- Publication in Official Journal of the French Republic
June 13, 2024- Enactment of Attractiveness Law No. 2024-537 (establishing 15-year maximum lock-up period)
January 10, 2024- Revised ELTIF Regulation came into application
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the International Sustainability Standards Board’s consultation on the exposure drafts on international sustainability disclosures
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, issued a position paper on July 27, 2022, responding to the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) consultation on exposure drafts for international sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2). This matters for compliance professionals as it signals France's push for global-EU interoperability in ESG reporting, influencing how firms align ISSB "investor-focused" standards with Europe's double-materiality CSRD/ESRS framework to avoid dual reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/amfs-eu-positions/amf-response-issb-consultation-exposure-drafts-sustainability-disclosure-standards; https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/Position%20paper%20ISSB%20AMF%20-%20July%202022_0.pdf
#
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but AMF's recommendations to ISSB, emphasizing:
Interoperability with EU standards: AMF urges alignment between ISSB's financial materiality approach and EFRAG's double-materiality (impact + financial) ESRS, including jurisdictional working groups for compatibility.
Broad ESG coverage: Calls for sector-agnostic standards beyond climate (e.g., full ESG spectrum via collaboration with EFRAG/GRI).
Phased implementation: Suggests gradual rollout of detailed requirements
What You Need To Do
Monitor and map standards
Engage in transitions
Enhance reporting processes
Stakeholder dialogue
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This 2022 AMF response is historical but highly relevant amid 2025 EFRAG simplifications emphasizing ISSB interoperability, as EU firms juggle CSRD with global ISSB momentum (e.g., IFRS finals in 2023). Matters for avoiding reporting fragmentation, with risks of supervisory scrutiny
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the EFRAG consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's position paper responds to EFRAG's 2022 public consultation on the first set of draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming their ambition on ESG topics and double materiality while urging proportionality, international interoperability, materiality focus, and alignment with EU laws like SFDR. This matters for compliance professionals as it shapes final ESRS, influencing mandatory sustainability disclosures for EU firms and financial market participants from 2024 onward, with potential simplifications affecting reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amfs-response-efrag-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting-standards
#
What Changed
This is a consultation response, not a final rule, but AMF highlights these priorities for ESRS development:
International interoperability: Convergence with ISSB standards to avoid duplication and meet investor needs across jurisdictions. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
Proportionality in disclosures: Gradual implementation, prioritizing climate standards, balancing stakeho
What You Need To Do
Monitor ESRS evolution
Enhance materiality processes
Align reporting systems
Engage stakeholders
Pilot disclosures
Key Dates
July 2022- AMF submits response to EFRAG consultation on draft ESRS. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2024- First CSRD application for FY 2024 reports (large public-interest entities). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2025- ESRS adoption by European Commission (first set covering SFDR needs). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
TBD (post-2025)- EC Delegated Act on simplified ESRS, subject to 2-month EU Parliament/Council scrutiny. https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-provides-its-technical-advice-on-draft-simplified-esrs-to-the-european-commission
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Historical (2022) input shapes binding ESRS already applying in 2024/2025, but ongoing simplifications (e.g., 2025 EC advice) offer relief on burdens; critical for FY2026+ prep amid interoperability push, yet not immediate mandates. Matters for reducing overload, ensuring SFDR comp
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines one natural person and five legal entities, including a management company, for failing to comply with several reporting obligations in relation to a concerted action carried out in the context of a takeover bid and, in the case of the...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on one natural person and five legal entities, including an investment management company, for failing to comply with multiple reporting obligations related to a concerted action during a partial takeover bid.[User Query]. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of transparency rules in takeover scenarios, serving as a critical reminder for market participants to adhere to disclosure timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and reputational damage.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision highlighting existing obligations under French financial markets law, particularly those governing concerted actions (actions concertées) and reporting in takeover bids. Key requirements reinforced include:
Timely disclosure of positions and intentions when parties act in concert, as per AMF regulations on major holdings and takeover bids (e.g., Article L. 233-10 of the French Commercial Code and AMF General Regulatio
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance internal procedures for monitoring share positions, identifying concerted actions, and automating AMF filings
Train front-office and compliance teams on takeover bid disclosures, including documentation of coordination (e
Implement pre-trade alerts for threshold breaches and conduct periodic audits of historical filings
For management companies
Key Dates
Within 4 trading days- Declaration of crossing major holding thresholds or intent to continue acquisitions (AMF Form DOC-2005-01).
Immediate (same day)- Notification of concerted action agreements in takeover contexts.
Within 10 trading days- Detailed position reports post-crossing.
in 2025(e.g., 16 July 2025 for inside information breaches).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to the AMF Enforcement Committee's pattern of fining reporting failures (e.g., €1.89M in July 2025 for late disclosures, €1.7M in June 2025 for shareholder breaches), signaling intensified scrutiny on M&A transparency amid volatile markets. Non-compliance risks fines
Derivatives or structured products Journalists The AMF has published a study of the profile of participants and their positions in the Matif agricultural commodities derivatives market
Innovation AMF activity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF continues its data strategy with the release of short selling data to the public
Institutional AMF activity Appointment Journalists Appointments to the Legal Affairs Directorate and Enforcement Assistance Directorate of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces internal appointments to its **Legal Affairs Directorate** and **Enforcement Assistance Directorate**, signaling potential enhancements in legal oversight and enforcement capabilities within France's financial markets regulator. Compliance professionals should note this as it may indicate a renewed focus on rigorous enforcement of market rules, though it imposes no direct regulatory changes on firms.
#
What Changed
There are no regulatory changes, new requirements, or policy updates in this announcement. It solely details personnel appointments within AMF's internal structure, specifically leadership roles in directorates handling legal affairs (e.g., Maxence Delorme as head of Legal Affairs Directorate) and enforcement assistance (e.g., Amélie du Passage as head of Instruction and Enforcement Assistance Directorate). These directorates support AMF's core functions like investigations, inspections, and san
What You Need To Do
*No specific actions are required for regulated firms, as this does not introduce obligations
Review ongoing AMF interactions (e
Update internal AMF contact lists with confirmed governance details from https://www
Track AMF news releases for enforcement trends at https://www
Key Dates
13 February 2024- Ministerial order partially renewing AMF Enforcement Committee.
20 February 2024- Publication of Enforcement Committee appointments.
27 February 2024- Composition published in Official Journal.
16 October 2023- Appointment of Sébastien Raspiller as AMF Secretary General.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low. This matters peripherally for firms anticipating AMF enforcement, as new leaders in Legal Affairs and Enforcement Assistance could signal stricter scrutiny or faster processing of cases, similar to past leadership transitions (e.g., Secretary General appointment in 2023). However, abse
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF reiterates its call for a European regulation of ESG data, ratings, and related services
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against unauthorised Forex trading offers from Omega Pro Ltd
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a Dutch trading firm and three Dutch traders for price manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined a Dutch trading firm and three Dutch traders for price manipulation on French markets, demonstrating the regulator's cross-border enforcement reach against market abuse. This case underscores AMF's aggressive stance on manipulative trading practices, serving as a deterrent for international firms and individuals active in EU-linked markets. Compliance teams should note it as evidence of heightened scrutiny on trading desks handling correlated instruments.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing prohibitions under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR, Regulation (EU) No 596/2014) against price manipulation, including fixing prices at abnormal or artificial levels through deceptive trades. It aligns with prior AMF decisions, such as the €20 million fine on Morgan Stanley for similar OAT/OLO manipulations via futures positioning (decision dated 4 December 2019). No new requirements are introduced, but it highlights
What You Need To Do
Enhance surveillance
Trader training
Internal controls
Compliance reviews
Key Dates
4 December 2019; EcoR1: 13 December 2024; SMCP: 10 June 2025).
30 June 2026.
16 September 2025.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This signals AMF's expanding cross-jurisdictional enforcement (Dutch firm/traders), with fines on firms and individuals, amid proposed powers enhancements (e.g., penalty payments, communication on probes). Firms face personal accountability risks and market reputation damage; non-EU
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed significant sanctions on DCT (formerly Didier Maurin Finance) and its manager Didier Maurin for recommending unauthorized alternative investment funds to clients and obstructing regulatory investigations. This case exemplifies critical compliance failures in product authorization verification and client suitability assessment, with enforcement upheld by France's highest administrative court in September 2024.
What Changed
This enforcement action clarifies several regulatory obligations for financial investment advisors:
Product Authorization Verification: Financial advisors must verify that recommended investment products are authorized for marketing in France before advising clients, regardless of the product's legitimacy in other jurisdictions.
Client Interest Prioritization: Recommending unauthorized products is inherently contrary to client interests and constitutes a breach of the duty to act with competen
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance measures for financial investment advisors:
*Product Authorization Audit
*Pre-Recommendation Due Diligence
*Client Suitability Documentation
*Regulatory Cooperation Protocol
Key Dates
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee issued original decision imposing five-year ban and fines
18 July 2022- Conseil d'État suspended enforcement of fines pending appeal
9 September 2024- Conseil d'État dismissed appeal, upholding all sanctions and ordering payment of €1,500 each to AMF
Supervision Fixed income Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on post-trade transparency in the bond market
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a biotech company for failing to disclose inside information as soon as possible, and one of its co-founders and one of its shareholders for unlawful disclosure or use of inside information
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned a biotech company for delaying disclosure of inside information, and fined a co-founder and shareholder for unlawfully disclosing or using it, violating EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) obligations under Articles 7, 10, and 17. This case underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of timely public disclosure and insider handling, highlighting risks of personal liability for executives and shareholders in listed biotech firms. Compliance teams must prioritize robust information barrier procedures and insider list management to mitigate similar penalties.
#
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new regulations but reinforces existing MAR requirements transposed into AMF General Regulation (e.g., Article 315-1), including:
Immediate public disclosure: Issuers must disclose inside information "as soon as possible" under MAR Article 17, unless three conditions for delay are met (legitimate interest, confidentiality ensured, no public misleading).
Prohibition on unlawful disclosure/use: Persons with inside information cannot disclose it except per
What You Need To Do
Assess information promptly
Implement controls
Maintain insider lists
Train personnel
Archive disclosures
Key Dates
As soon as possible- Disclose inside information publicly, or immediately if confidentiality breached during delay.
Immediately after publication- Notify AMF (differepublication@amf-france.org) of any delayed inside information post-publication.
Within 3 trading days- Managers/directors report securities transactions to issuer and AMF.
Within 10 business days- Custodians respond to Euroclear France/AMF requests for shareholder identity disclosures.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose personal and corporate fines for disclosure failures, particularly in volatile sectors like biotech where trial data qualifies as inside information. Firms risk market disruption, reputational damage, and escalating penalties (e.g., hundr
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Market infrastructures Order Retail investors Market Infrastructures Journalists AMF publishes an analysis of retail investor order execution on French stocks
Sanctions & settlements Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctions a media company and its director for making investment recommendations without mentioning conflicts of interest and for price manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned a media company and its director for issuing investment recommendations without disclosing conflicts of interest and engaging in price manipulation, highlighting the regulator's strict enforcement against market abuse and transparency failures. This case underscores the AMF's focus on protecting investors from misleading practices by non-traditional actors like media outlets, with penalties serving as a deterrent amid rising digital fraud. Compliance teams must prioritize conflict disclosures and surveillance to avoid similar actions, as it reinforces ongoing AMF priorities in conduct and market integrity.
#
What Changed
This enforcement decision does not introduce new regulations but reaffirms and clarifies existing requirements under AMF rules and EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR):
Mandatory conflict of interest disclosure: Investment recommendations must explicitly mention any conflicts, such as financial stakes or relationships influencing the advice, to ensure clear, non-misleading information.
Prohibition on price manipulation: Practices artificially influencing security prices, including through coordinate
What You Need To Do
Conduct conflict of interest audits
Enhance surveillance for market abuse
Update compliance policies
Training programs
Inducement reviews
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to the AMF's escalating enforcement (e.g., record 12 sanction decisions in 2024 affecting 60 entities, €26.5M fines), targeting non-authorized actors like media amid digital fraud surges (181 sites shut down in 2024). Media and advisory firms face director-level liab
Short selling Equity Financial Crisis Executive & other private individuals Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists French and Dutch market authorities publish a joint analysis of the...
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF to call for an amendment of the law on obstructing investigations and inspections
AI Analysis
The AMF announced its intention to propose legislative amendments to the French Monetary and Financial Code following a January 28, 2022 Constitutional Council decision that found dual prosecution for obstructing AMF investigations and inspections unconstitutional. The amendment aims to eliminate the possibility of simultaneous administrative and criminal penalties for the same obstruction conduct, while preserving the AMF's enforcement authority.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change addresses a constitutional violation regarding dual prosecution under the ne bis in idem principle:
Current problem: The Monetary and Financial Code previously allowed both administrative sanctions by the AMF Enforcement Committee and criminal prosecution for identical obstruction conduct, violating the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
Proposed solution: Legislative amendments will eliminate the possibility of dual prosecution while maintaining
What You Need To Do
*For compliance professionals and regulated entities:
*Review cooperation policies
*Assess ongoing proceedings
*Monitor legislative developments
*Counsel on cooperation
Key Dates
January 28, 2022- Constitutional Council decision declaring dual prosecution unconstitutional
No specific implementation deadline stated- AMF committed to proposing amendments "as soon as possible"
Current status (as of January 2026)- Amendments appear to be in legislative proposal stage; no effective date yet announced
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF invites providers, users and rated entities to respond to ESMA's Call for evidence on the ESG rating market in Europe
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French stakeholders—ESG rating providers, users, and rated entities—to respond to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence on the EU ESG rating market to inform European Commission efforts on improving transparency and reliability. This matters as it contributes to the foundational data driving the ESG Ratings Regulation (EU 2024/3005), which imposes authorization, disclosure, and conflict-of-interest rules on providers, affecting sustainable finance compliance across the EU. With the regulation applying from 2 July 2026, early engagement helps shape final rules amid ongoing ESMA consultations on technical standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes responses to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence, which gathered market insights to support the European Commission's July 2021 sustainable finance strategy. However, it highlights the push for a European framework on ESG ratings, including transparency on methodologies, conflict-of-interest management, internal controls, and dialogue with rated companies—elements now codified in the ESG Ratings Regulation effective 2 January 202
What You Need To Do
For ESG Providers
For Users and Rated Entities
All Affected Firms
AMF Stakeholders
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The 2022 Call for Evidence is historical, but it feeds into the ESG Ratings Regulation now in force (since 2 January 2025), with application looming on 2 July 2026—less than 6 months away as of January 2026. Firms face authorization risks, operational overhauls for conflicts/disclosu
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Covid-19 Closing of the 2021 financial statements: the AMF publishes its recommendations and the results of its recent work examining financial statements
Asset management Prospectus Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF proposes measures to promote a wider adoption of liquidity management tools by fund managers
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Takeover listed companies The AMF proposes targeted measures to make financial markets more attractive for companies
Crypto-assets Innovation Market infrastructures New step forward in the adoption of the regulation on a Pilot Regime for market infrastructures based on the blockchain technology
Long term investment Retail investors Journalists More than one million new retail investors have entered equity markets in France over the last 3 years, according to the AMF's dashboard
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an issuer's Chief Financial Officer for insider dealing
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined an issuer's Chief Financial Officer (CFO) for insider dealing, highlighting the regulator's aggressive enforcement against market abuse by senior executives. This case underscores the personal liability of insiders who trade on privileged information, reinforcing the need for robust internal controls in listed companies. Compliance teams must prioritize insider trading prevention to mitigate similar sanctions risks.
#
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new regulatory changes but exemplifies ongoing application of existing Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) rules under EU Regulation 596/2014 and AMF General Regulations, including Articles 223-9 and 221-3 on inside information disclosure and trading bans. It aligns with AMF Position-Recommendation No 2016-08 on managing inside information, emphasizing black-out periods (e.g., 30 days before annual/interim results) and trading restrictions for Persons Dischar
What You Need To Do
Maintain insider lists and notify affected persons of trading restrictions; train staff on MAR Article 17 (disclosure) and Article 19 (PDMR dealings)
Strengthen monitoring of gifts, transactions in derivatives/index products, and whistleblowing mechanisms, as urged in AMF/AFA joint guidance
Ensure PDMR transaction reporting within 3 trading days via AMF portal
Conduct regular compliance inspections on insider networks and corruption risks, formalizing prohibitions in codes of ethics
Key Dates
3 trading days- PDMRs must report securities transactions to issuer and AMF.DEADLINE
December 4, 2024- EU Regulation 2024/2809 amending MAR entered into force.
June 5, 2026- Certain amendments in sample insider policies apply (e.g., Groupe Casino policy).
June 30, 2026- AMF General Regulation updates effective.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This demonstrates AMF's focus on holding executives accountable, with fines signaling zero tolerance amid rising "insider networks" linked to organized crime, as noted in AMF's 2024 report and 2025 AMF/AFA warnings. Firms face heightened inspection risks, reputational damage, and per
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Sustainable Finance Annual report Disclosure Obligations Taxonomy Article 8: The AMF informs issuers about the phased application of reporting requirements
Cooperation Derivatives or structured products Europe & international Markets Post-trading infrastructures The AMF and the ACPR sign two cooperation agreements with the SEC regarding the regime applicable to Security Based Swap Dealers (SBSD) in the U.S
Financial products Bids Shares Financial disclosures & corporate financing Markets The AMF publishes a study on the development of the SPAC market and its challenges
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Atypical products Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Derivatives or structured products The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities proposing in France forex investments and investment services in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments or offering binary options trading without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments or offering binary options trading without being authorized to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns the public against the activities of certain websites offering to sell shares of La Française des Jeux without authorisation
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering diamond investments
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) warns the public against the company International Markets Live LTD (IMarketsLive)
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering diamond investments
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) warns the public against the activities of www.chs-capital.com engaging in unauthorized investment services
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning issues a public warning against the activity of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning concerning communication from BLUE STONE LTD and companies related to it with respect to diamond investment offers
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) advises the clients of the websites www.interactiveoption.com, www.interactive-option.com, www.hellobrokers.com, www.mtxplus.com and www.pegasecapital.com to contact Pegase Capital Ltd, the owner of these websites, as soon as possible
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a general public warning about sites touting the benefits of an algorithm and linking to a trading platform, and a specific warning about Preditrend
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns investors about binary options platforms copying the official information of duly regulated companies
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) is warning the public against sites misusing its name and logo and redirecting to binary option trading platforms.
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns the public about the activities of individuals claiming to work for the AMF
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading