ESMA publishes report on cross-border marketing of funds including statistics on notifications 06 January 2026 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its third report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under the Regulation on cross-border distribution of funds . For the first time, the report includes statistics on notifications of cross-border marketing of funds. Drawing on input from ...
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti (SR 946.231.139.4) publiziert.
Central Bank of Ireland has successfully completed the sale of its Spencer Dock (East Wing) building to the Office of Public Works for €23.7m. The sale of Spencer Dock was a key element of the Central Bank’s longer term property strategy aligned to our decision to develop a single Dockland Campus through the purchase of our North Wall Quay building and subsequent purchase of our Mayor Street building. This sale of the East Wing, to Office of Public Works on 22 January 2026, follows the earlie...
We have signed a contract with Etrading Software (ETS) to deliver the UK bond consolidated tape. A high-quality tape will provide investors with a comprehensive overview of the bond market and support price formation and liquidity. It will help maintain the UK’s position as a highly competitive and compelling place to invest and grow.ETS has now launched a website that sets out key milestones and provides technical information for data contributors and users. We will continue to support ETS a...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed settled charges against Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM) and its former executives, Vince Macciocchi and Ray Young, and a litigated action against its former executive Vikram Luthar, for …
FINRA issued an Information Notice on January 3, 2025, modifying the Contrary Exercise Advice (CEA) cut-off time for options expiring on January 9, 2025, from the standard 5:30 p.m. ET to 10:00 a.m. ET due to the National Day of Mourning. This time-sensitive directive required immediate operational adjustments for all broker-dealers and clearing members handling options exercise instructions on that specific date.
What Changed
The primary regulatory modification addresses a single-day exception to standard options exercise procedures:
CEA Cut-Off Time Acceleration: The normal 5:30 p.m. ET deadline for submitting Contrary Exercise Advice was compressed to 10:00 a.m. ET on January 9, 2025.
Exercise Instruction Acceptance Window: Members could not accept exercise instructions for either customer or non-customer accounts after 10:00 a.m. ET on that date.
OCC Processing Unchanged: The Options Clearing Corporation's proc
What You Need To Do
*Update Internal Procedures
*System Configuration
*Staff Communication
*Customer Notification
*Submission Coordination
Key Dates
January 9, 2025 - 10:00 a.m. ETFinal deadline for option holders to make exercise/non-exercise decisions and for members to accept exercise instructions (accelerated from standard 5:30 p.m. ET)DEADLINE
January 9, 2025 - 10:00 a.m. ETFinal deadline for members to submit Contrary Exercise Advice to exchanges or OCC (accelerated from standard 5:30 p.m. ET or 7:30 p.m. ET depending on account type and submission method)DEADLINE
January 9, 2025National Day of Mourning; national options exchanges closed; exercises in specified option classes prohibited
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH (for January 9, 2025 operations; now historical)
This FINRA Information Notice announces the SEC's reduction of the Section 31 fee rate to $0.00 per million dollars in specified securities transactions, effective May 14, 2025, following the SEC's Fee Rate Advisory for Fiscal Year 2025. It matters because it eliminates these transaction fees for FINRA member firms for the remainder of FY 2025 (and potentially beyond until FY 2026 appropriations), reducing costs and simplifying billing processes amid the SEC's over-collection of its appropriation target.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
#
What Changed
The Section 31 fee rate drops from $27.80 per million dollars to $0.00 per million dollars for covered securities transactions on exchanges and over-the-counter markets, applicable to trade dates (charge dates) of May 14, 2025, or later.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
The assessment on security futures transactions remains unchanged at $0.0042 per round turn transaction.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
FINRA wil
What You Need To Do
Update internal billing, invoicing, and financial reporting systems to reflect the $0
Review and adjust any automated fee calculations or client pass-through mechanisms for transactions on or after the effective date
Contact FINRA's Amanda Rath for finance questions ((240) 386-6637) or SEC's Robert McNamee/Faisal Sheikh for legal/interpretive issues; monitor SEC website for updates
Test systems for security futures (unchanged rate) and confirm no inadvertent charging of Section 31 fees post-effective date
Key Dates
April 8, 2025- SEC announces Fee Rate Advisory for Fiscal Year 2025.
April 24, 2025- FINRA publishes Information Notice.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
May 13, 2025- Last day for current rate of $27.80 per million (trade dates through this date).[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
May 14, 2025- New rate of $0.00 per million takes effect for trade dates (charge dates) on or after this date; applies to OTC sales and options settlements/exercises.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250424]
Ongoing until 60 days after FY 2026 appropriation enactment- $0.00 rate remains in effect.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a beneficial change eliminating fees due to SEC over-collection, with no new requirements or penalties; firms already past the May 14, 2025, effective date (as of January 2026) face minimal risk if systems were updated timely. It matters for cost savings, accurate financials,
This FINRA Information Notice announces the termination of **Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-1** effective July 1, 2025, with **Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-2** taking effect for transactions in eligible securities by FINRA member CAT executing brokers. It matters because firms must transition billing and payment processes seamlessly to avoid disruptions in CAT cost recovery compliance under FINRA Rule 6897(b)(1)(D).
#
What Changed
Termination of Fee 2025-1: No longer applied to transactions after June 30, 2025, per FINRA Rule 6897(b)(1)(D), which requires notice upon replacement by a subsequent fee.
Implementation of Fee 2025-2: New fee recovers FINRA's ~$7.27 million share of budgeted CAT costs for July 1–December 31, 2025; monthly invoicing begins for July 2025 transactions.
Distinction from CAT LLC fees: Unrelated to "CAT Fee 2025-1" (assessed by CAT LLC, rate $0.000022 per transaction, remains in effect).
#
What You Need To Do
Verify internal systems stop applying Fee 2025-1 post-June 30, 2025, and prepare for Fee 2025-2 invoicing starting July transactions
Review and pay final Fee 2025-1 invoice (due August 2025) per Rule 6897(b)(2)
Update budgeting/forecasting models for Fee 2025-2 (covers H2 2025 CAT costs); monitor FINRA notices for rate details via SR-FINRA-2025-010
Contact Amanda Rath ((240) 386-6637) or Faisal Sheikh ((202) 728-8379) for questions
Distinguish FINRA fees from CAT LLC fees to avoid double-counting in financial controls
Key Dates
June 30, 2025- Last day Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-1 applies to transactions.
July 1, 2025- Prospective CAT Cost Recovery Fee 2025-2 takes effect for transactions.
July 2025- Last invoice sent for Fee 2025-1 (based on June 2025 transactions).
August 2025- Payments due for Fee 2025-1 final invoice; first invoices for Fee 2025-2 issued (based on July transactions).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Primarily administrative; no new reporting burdens, but failure to transition could lead to underpayment, late fees, or Rule 6897 violations. Matters for high-volume brokers due to monthly cash flow impacts and ongoing CAT funding obligations (totaling FINRA's 2025 budgeted costs).
FINRA's Information Notice dated October 21, 2025, reminds member firms of NSCC's amendment to Rule 50, effective October 17, 2025, which removes the "Settle Prep Day" from the ACATS process, shortening full customer account transfers to 3-4 business days. This matters because it aligns with FINRA Rule 11870's requirements to expedite transfers, enhances operational efficiency, reduces risk, and improves client experience amid broader industry shifts like T+1 settlement.[original notice]
#
What Changed
Removal of Settle Prep Day: NSCC Rule 50 amended to eliminate the settlement preparation stage from ACATS, effective October 17, 2025, streamlining the process for all securities transfers.[original notice]
Mutual Fund/Options Synchronization: Eliminates the extra day for processing mutual funds and options via Fund/SERV, aligning their settlement with other assets; also removes the second day of Fund/SERV pending acknowledgment.[original notice]
Overall Timeline Reduction: Full ACATS transfers
September 10, 2025- Federal Register publication of SEC approval (90 FR 43709).[original notice]
October 17, 2025- Effective date: Removal of Settle Prep Day and Fund/SERV changes; firms must support next-day settling assets.[original notice]DEADLINE
October 2026- Planned modernization of ACATS client interfaces (decommission of legacy formats; migration to JSON/MQ for enhanced messaging).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Effective over three months ago (as of January 2026), with industry-wide accommodation confirmed; no new mandates but requires ongoing operational alignment to avoid Rule 11870 violations (e.g., delays in validation or exceptions). Matters for reducing transfer failures, enhancing
FINRA's Information Notice 11/7/25 publishes a **2026 Filing Schedule** on its website to guide clearing firms on accurate submission dates for extensions of time under Federal Reserve Regulation T, SEA Rule 15c3-3, and FINRA Rule 4210, accounting for holidays and business days. This matters because the automated REX system rejects incorrect dates, forcing resubmissions that delay compliance and risk regulatory violations amid shortened settlement cycles.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory requirements or rule amendments; this is guidance providing a pre-calculated Filing Schedule for 2026 to prevent errors in the REX system. It emphasizes using schedule dates around holidays when exchanges or banks close, and confirms fixed SEA Rule 15c3-3 deadlines (e.g., 30th/45th calendar days post-settlement, 10th business day for (m) possession/control, regardless of foreign settlement cycles).
#
What You Need To Do
Access and reference the 2026 Filing Schedule on FINRA's website (via https://www
Input schedule-specific dates for extensions, particularly around 2026 holidays when exchanges/banks close, to avoid automatic denials
File SEA Rule 15c3-3 extensions on exact due dates listed above, even for foreign-traded securities
Contact Theresa Reynolds (646-315-8567 or email) for questions
Update internal compliance calendars, training, and systems to integrate the schedule
Key Dates
November 7, 2025- Notice published; 2026 Filing Schedule made available on FINRA website.
Throughout 2026- Use Filing Schedule for all extension requests, especially pre/post-holidays (e.g., Veterans Day 11/11/2026 bank holiday, Thanksgiving 11/26/2026, Christmas 12/25/2026).
30th calendar day after settlement- (d)(2).
45th calendar day after settlement- (d)(3), (h).
2nd business day after 30th calendar day from segregation deficit- (d)(4).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Proactive guidance prevents operational disruptions from REX rejections, but no immediate deadlines or penalties for non-use; however, inaccurate filings risk delayed margin compliance, customer liquidations under Regulation T, or possession/control failures under SEA Rule 15c3-3,
FINRA Information Notice 11/10/25 provides due dates for 2026 and Q1 2027 filings of Annual Reports, FOCUS Reports, Form Custody, and various supplemental schedules under SEA Rule 17a-5 and FINRA Rule 4524. It matters because it ensures timely electronic submissions via FINRA Gateway, incorporates SEC amendments for EDGAR PDF filings (with future Interactive Data requirements), and highlights a 30-day extension option for qualifying smaller firms, helping prevent compliance failures amid federal holidays. https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251110
#
What Changed
Electronic Filing Mandates: All specified filings must be submitted electronically via FINRA Gateway; SEC no longer accepts paper Annual Reports, requiring EDGAR PDF submissions under amended SEA Rule 17a-5(d)(6)(i). https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251110
SEC Interactive Data Compliance Dates: Annual reports and supplements must be filed as Interactive Data Files per Rule 405 of Regulation S-T; firms with net capital ≥$250,000 (as of Dec 31, 2025) comply for fi
What You Need To Do
Submit all filings electronically via FINRA Gateway by 11:59 p
For 30-day extension
Affirm de minimis exemptions in eFOCUS for OBS/SIS/SLS where applicable
Prepare for Interactive Data
Contact firm's Risk Monitoring Analyst for questions; review eFOCUS guidance and SIPC site
Key Dates
2026Nov 30, 2025 period (ext: March 2, 2026)
2026Dec 31, 2025 period (ext: March 31, 2026)
2026Jan 31, 2026 period (ext: May 1, 2026)
2026Feb 28, 2026 period (ext: May 29, 2026)
2026March 31, 2026 period (ext: June 29, 2026)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Multiple imminent deadlines (e.g., January 27-29, 2026 for Q4 2025 filings, just days from today), mandatory electronic/EDGAR shifts, and late fees/exam risks for misses; smaller firms gain extension relief but must notify promptly. Non-compliance risks enforcement under SEA Rule 17a
FINRA Information Notice 11/14/25 summarizes SEC amendments to SEA Rule 17a-5 mandating electronic filing of broker-dealer annual reports, supplemental reports, and Form 17-H on EDGAR in PDF format, alongside FOCUS Report updates including electronic signatures and elimination of notarization. These changes modernize submissions, eliminate paper filings to the SEC, and impose new interactive data requirements with phased compliance, requiring broker-dealers to secure EDGAR access and adapt processes promptly to avoid disruptions.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
#
What Changed
Electronic Filing Mandate: SEC no longer accepts paper submissions of annual reports (Form X-17A-5 Part III), supplemental reports under SEA Rule 17a-5(k), and Form 17-H; all must be filed on EDGAR in PDF format.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
Electronic Signatures Permitted: Allowed for all SEA Rule 17a-5 reports (including annual and FOCUS Reports) via specified processes, e.g., Adobe Acrobat digitally signed certificates with document locking; FOCUS
What You Need To Do
Implement electronic signature processes (e
Retain signed Oath or Affirmation for 6 years per SEA Rule 17a-4 (no notarization)
Review FINRA eFOCUS page for FOCUS amendments; prepare for interactive data filings per net capital tier (test systems in advance)
Direct questions to firm's Risk Monitoring Analyst
Key Dates
June 30, 2025Electronic PDF filing on EDGAR mandatory for annual reports (fiscal years ending on/after this date), supplemental reports (SEA Rule 17a-5(k)), and Form 17-H; no paper accepted.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
December 31, 2025Reference date for determining firm net capital threshold ($250,000+) for interactive data compliance phasing.DEADLINE
June 30, 2027Interactive Data File requirement applies to filings due on/after for firms with ≥ $250,000 minimum net capital (as of 12/31/2025).DEADLINE
June 30, 2029Interactive Data File requirement applies to filings due on/after for firms with < $250,000 minimum net capital (as of 12/31/2025).DEADLINE
As early as possible pre-due dateSubmit Form ID for EDGAR access (5-7 business day approval delay).[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20251114]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate action needed for EDGAR access and PDF filings (past June 30, 2025 deadline as of January 2026), risking filing rejections or enforcement if unprepared; interactive data adds future burden but allows planning. Matters due to SEC's zero-tolerance for paper, potential delays
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues. To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
GC25/1 within Primary Market Bulletin No. 55 consults on targeted amendments to FCA Knowledge Base technical notes to align with UK Listing Rules (UKLR) changes effective 29 July 2024 and a new ESEF taxonomy for digital reporting. This matters for listed issuers and advisors as it updates formal guidance on periodic reporting, inside information handling, and position disclosures, ensuring compliance with post-reform listing regime requirements.
#
What Changed
Amendments to five technical notes: FCA/TN/506.2 (Periodic financial information and inside information), Primary Market/TN/507.1 (Structured digital reporting for IFRS annual statements, reflecting new ESEF taxonomy per DTR 4.1.15R), UKLA/TN/520.2 (Delaying disclosure/dealing with leaks and rumours), UKLA/TN/521.3 (Assessing and handling inside information), and UKLA/TN/542.2 (Issuer's obligations on position disclosures).
Broader PMB 55 finalises 44 notes (e.g., TN/209.4 on Listing Principle 2
What You Need To Do
Review blacklined amendments in GC25/1 and PMB 55; submit feedback by 15 May 2025 if impacted
Update internal policies, training, and procedures to reflect finalised notes (e
Until finalised, interpret existing guidance in light of UKLR; monitor for TN/710 update in future PMB
For digital reporting, prepare for new ESEF taxonomy in annual IFRS statements
Key Dates
2025Guidance Consultation opens.
2025Guidance Consultation closes; comments due to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk.DEADLINE
July 2025(target) - FCA intends to finalise consulted notes.
2024UKLR effective date (context for updates).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Past consultation deadline (15 May 2025) as of January 2026, but finalisation expected by July 2025 requires proactive policy reviews to avoid non-compliance with updated listing guidance. Matters for market integrity and operational alignment with UKLR reforms, with low immediate
FCA PS25/19 finalizes rules to streamline complaints reporting by replacing multiple existing returns with a single consolidated return, enhancing data quality, consistency, and vulnerability identification while reducing burdens. This matters for compliance teams as it mandates system and process updates to improve regulatory oversight and consumer protection, with implementation required within 12 months.
#
What Changed
Consolidated complaints return: Replaces five existing returns (DISP 1 Annex 1, Consumer Credit Return (CCR), Funeral Plans (FP), Claims Management Companies (CMCs), and Electronic Money and Payment Services Return (PSR)) with one unified return to reduce duplication and improve comparability.
Permission-based reporting: Firms report only sections relevant to their regulated permissions, targeting reporting to specific activities.
Simplified nil returns: Proportionate approach allows upfront sel
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal complaints recording, categorization, and reporting systems to align with new consolidated return, taxonomy, permission-based sections, and vulnerability data points
Integrate FCA Vulnerability Guidance into complaints processes for identification and reporting
Test and prepare for fixed 6-monthly submissions via FCA systems; complete nil return simplifications where applicable
For Retail Banking, Insurance, Payment Services, and CMCs: Retain and adapt contextualised data capture
Key Dates
2025Consultation opened.[User Query]
2025Consultation closed.[User Query]
2025Policy Statement PS25/19 published, with 12-month implementation period starting.
2026Feedback deadline on Chapter 4 questions (email to FCA).DEADLINE
202730/06/2027 - First reporting period under new process.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With publication on 3 Dec 2025 and a 12-month implementation window (to ~Dec 2026), firms must prioritize system changes now, as the first period starts 1 Jan 2027; non-compliance risks enforcement, especially on vulnerability reporting and transparency, amid FCA's focus on consumer
The FCA's GC25/2: Primary Market Bulletin No. 57 (PMB 57), published 25 July 2025, consults on amendments to Technical Note 710.1 ('Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors') and a new Technical Note 638.1 on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules for prospectuses. This matters as it updates the Knowledge Base to align with the new UK Listing Regime (UKLR) and Prospectus Rules, providing clarity for sponsors and issuers ahead of the PRM sourcebook effective January 2026, reducing compliance risks in primary markets.
#
What Changed
Amendments to TN 710.1 (Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors): Revisions clarify the scope of 'preparatory work' and sponsor obligations under UKLR 4, building on feedback from PMB 48, 53, and PS24/6; changes marked against PMB 53 version.
New TN 638.1 (Guidance on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules): Updated draft provides detailed guidance for prospectus applications by companies with complex histories (e.g., acquisitive models), including scenarios, exam
What You Need To Do
Review and respond
Update policies/processes
Monitor finalisation
Implement NSM changes
Key Dates
2025Consultation opens (GC25/2 published).
2025Consultation closes (submit comments to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk).
2026New Prospectus Rules: Admission to Trading on a Regulated Market (PRM) sourcebook, UKLR changes, and Market Conduct amendments effective (per PS25/9).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Consultation closed 12/09/2025 (past deadline as of January 2026), but final notes (e.g., TN 710 by end-2025) and PRM effective 19/01/2026 require immediate policy reviews to avoid prospectus rejections or sponsor breaches. Matters for primary market competitiveness and investor pr
The FCA's updated Statement of Policy outlines its approach to statutory investigations into possible regulatory failures under Part 5 of the Financial Services Act 2012, including criteria for triggering investigations and producing reports for HM Treasury. It matters because it clarifies when the FCA must self-scrutinize serious lapses in regulation, helping firms anticipate rare but high-profile probes into systemic issues affecting consumer protection, market integrity, or competition. The primary update adjusts inflation-linked monetary thresholds for assessing "significant" consumer detriment, ensuring the policy remains relevant.
#
What Changed
Inflation-adjusted monetary thresholds for consumer detriment: Detriment exceeding £210 million is more likely deemed "significant," while below £45 million is unlikely to meet the threshold unless qualitative factors (e.g., consumer vulnerability, widespread impact) apply. These replace 2013 levels and will be reviewed periodically.
No other substantive changes from the 2013 policy; refinements emphasize internal "lessons learned" reviews for non-statutory cases to avoid resource duplication in
What You Need To Do
Monitor for triggering events
Enhance internal reviews
No direct firm obligations
Document qualitative factors (e
Key Dates
14 November 2025- Publication date of updated Statement of Policy.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This update signals FCA's commitment to accountability without imposing new firm-level rules, but it heightens focus on significant failures (£45m+ detriment), potentially leading to public reports exposing industry-wide gaps. Firms with high consumer exposure (e.g., retail-facing)
The FCA's CP25/31 proposes a regulatory framework for introducing a UK equity Consolidated Tape (CT), operated by a Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP), to collate and distribute comprehensive post-trade data (prices and volumes) across trading venues and OTC trades in equities, including shares, ETFs, depository receipts, and similar instruments. This matters for compliance as it imposes new data contribution obligations on trading venues and APAs, aims to enhance market transparency and competitiveness under the FCA's 2025-2030 Strategy, and builds on FSMA 2023 powers for Data Reporting Services Providers (DRSPs). Firms must engage now to shape rules via consultation, with potential operations targeted for 2027.
#
What Changed
CTP Obligations: Proposed rules establish core regulatory requirements for CTPs, including governance, operational resiliency, data collation/distribution, competitive pricing, and simple licensing structures to ensure accessibility and affordability.
Data Contributor Obligations: Trading venues and Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs) must provide trade data (e.g., prices, volumes) to the CTP, covering trades across venues and OTC equity transactions.
Scope and Outcomes: CT focuses on post-
What You Need To Do
Respond to Consultation
Data Readiness
Monitor Updates
Engage Stakeholders
Compliance Mapping
Key Dates
2025Consultation opens and CP25/31 first published.
2026Consultation page last updated; period extended.
2026Consultation closes (extended from original dates).
2026FCA to publish CP on equity transparency regime (linked to CT).
2027Target for equity CT to be operational.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While still in consultation (closes 13/02/2026), proposals mandate data contributions from trading venues/APAs and CTP setup, with 2027 operations targeted; non-engagement risks misaligned systems or missed CTP opportunities. Matters due to FSMA 2023 empowerment, links to equity tran
The FCA's PS25/22 establishes a new regulatory framework for **targeted support**—a form of financial guidance that allows authorised firms to provide ready-made suggestions to consumer segments without conducting individualised suitability assessments. This framework addresses the UK's "advice gap" by enabling firms to deliver affordable, scalable financial support to an estimated 18 million consumers within a decade, fundamentally shifting how retail investors and pension savers access guidance on investment and retirement decisions.
What Changed
The framework introduces several material regulatory changes:
*New Specified Activity Status**
Targeted support will be designated as a new specified activity under the Regulated Activities Order, meaning only FCA-authorised firms can provide this service. This creates a regulatory boundary distinct from both unregulated guidance and regulated investment advice.
*Purpose Statement Refinement**
The FCA amended its original purpose statement from "better outcomes" to "better position" to clarify
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (January–February 2026)
*Pre-Implementation (March 2026)
Consumer segment definitions with supporting rationale
Ready-made suggestion frameworks
Communication templates explaining the nature of targeted support
Key Dates
29/08/2025- Consultation period closed (CP25/17 and CP25/26)
11/12/2025- Policy Statement PS25/22 published with near-final rules
March 2026- Firms may begin applying for targeted support permission
06/04/2026- New rules expected to come into force (subject to Government legislation making targeted support a specified activity)
The FCA and PRA are consulting on setting the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) at £113 million for 2026/27, comprising a £108 million management expenses budget (up £4.4 million from 2025/26, broadly in line with inflation) and a £5 million unlevied reserve. This matters because it caps the operating costs (e.g., IT, staff, legal, claims handling) that FCA- and PRA-authorised firms must fund via levies, excluding separate compensation payments, ensuring FSCS efficiency while controlling firm burdens.
#
What Changed
Proposed MELL of £113 million for 2026/27: £108 million budget + £5 million unlevied reserve.
Budget increase of £4.4 million (4%) from 2025/26, aligned with inflation; excluding new revolving credit facility (RCF) enhancement costs, it reflects a £6.6 million nominal and £11 million real-terms reduction on a like-for-like basis.
Budget allocated across PRA and FCA fee blocks based on firms' regulated business volume, with smaller firms contributing less.
No changes to compensation levies, which
What You Need To Do
Review CP26/2 (FCA) and CP1/26 (PRA) alongside FSCS January 2026 Budget Update for allocation details
Submit feedback on proposed MELL by 10 February 2026 to PRA (email or 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA)
Budget for potential levy payments starting 1 April 2026, based on firm's share of PRA/FCA classes (see Appendix 4 in CP)
Monitor post-consultation Policy Statement/Handbook Notice for final MELL confirmation
Key Dates
13 January 2026- Consultation opens (CP26/2 FCA; CP1/26 PRA).
10 February 2026- Consultation closes; submit comments via email or post to PRA (accepted on behalf of both regulators, shared anonymously with FSCS).
1 April 2026- Final rules effective (start of FSCS financial year); PRA Policy Statement and FCA Handbook Notice expected post-consultation.
31 March 2027- MELL period ends.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Firms face predictable levy increases aligned with inflation, with levies allocated by business volume (minimal for small firms), but must act on consultation feedback by 10 February 2026 (today is 25 January 2026, leaving ~2 weeks). Matters for financial planning and budgeting, as
On 6 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 2.500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €2,500 disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft on 6 November 2025 for failing to submit its 2024 financial year accounting documents electronically to the Bundesanzeiger within the required period, breaching section 325 HGB. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's oversight of basic disclosure obligations under the German Commercial Code, serving as a reminder that even minor procedural lapses can trigger sanctions amid heightened scrutiny of listed companies' reporting. Compliance teams should note this as indicative of rigorous enforcement on timely electronic filings, particularly for firms under financial stress like BayWa.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement of existing requirements under the German Commercial Code (HGB):
Section 325 HGB: Mandates submission of accounting documents (e.g., annual financial statements, management reports) for public disclosure via the Bundesanzeiger operator in electronic form within prescribed deadlines (typically three months after fiscal year-end for annual reports).
Section 335 HGB: Provides the legal basis for disciplinary fines by the BfJ for non-compliance, wit
What You Need To Do
Verify internal processes for electronic submission of accounting documents to Bundesanzeiger within HGB timelines (e
Implement automated reminders and dual-checks in finance/reporting workflows to prevent delays, especially during restructurings or audits
Review and update compliance calendars for all HGB-disclosure obligations; conduct training for finance teams on section 325/335 HGB
Monitor Bundesanzeiger portal for submission confirmations and retain proofs of timely filing to defend against BfJ inquiries
For firms like BayWa in StaRUG proceedings, coordinate with courts/legal advisors to file provisional disclosures if full audits are delayed
Key Dates
31 December 2024End of BayWa AG's financial year; accounting documents due for submission shortly after (typically by 31 March 2025 for three-month deadline under section 325 HGB).DEADLINE
6 November 2025BfJ issues disciplinary fine order for late submission.
23 January 2026BaFin publishes the enforcement notice.
2026_01_23_baywa_ag_2_en.html
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low – This is a minor fine (€2,500) for a procedural breach with no appeal, signaling routine enforcement rather than a policy shift. It matters as a low-cost warning for all HGB-reporting firms to automate filings, avoiding escalation in repeat cases or amid BaFin's focus on disclosure (e.
The Federal Office of Justice in Germany imposed a disciplinary fine of 2,500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft for failing to submit its accounting documents for the financial year 2024 in electronic form within the prescribed period. This action highlights the importance of compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code. Companies must ensure timely submission of financial reports to avoid similar penalties.
What Changed
The Federal Office of Justice enforced section 325 of the German Commercial Code, which requires companies to submit their accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form within the prescribed period.
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of accounting documents in electronic form to the German Federal Gazette
Review internal procedures to guarantee compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
Key Dates
6 Nov 2025The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft
Non-Compliance Risk
Disciplinary fines, such as the 2,500 euros imposed on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft, for non-compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
On 6 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 2.500 euros on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €2,500 disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft on 6 November 2025 for failing to submit its 2024 consolidated accounting documents electronically to the Bundesanzeiger within the required period, violating section 325 HGB. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's oversight of financial reporting obligations under German law and serves as a reminder of strict deadlines for public disclosure, even amid corporate challenges like BayWa's ongoing restructuring. Compliance teams should note it as a low-value but procedurally significant sanction, highlighting risks of administrative penalties for late filings.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement of existing requirements under the German Commercial Code (HGB):
Section 325 HGB: Mandates submission of consolidated accounting documents (e.g., annual financial statements, management reports) for disclosure in electronic form to the Bundesanzeiger operator within prescribed periods (typically three months after fiscal year-end for AGs, i.e., by 31 March for calendar-year filers).
Section 335 HGB: Provides the legal basis for disciplinary fine
What You Need To Do
Verify filing processes
Conduct gap analysis
Train staff
Monitor Bundesanzeiger confirmations
No appeal if fined
Key Dates
31 March 2025- Presumed deadline for BayWa to submit 2024 consolidated documents (three months post-31 December FY-end under § 325 HGB para. 1).DEADLINE
6 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €2,500 fine.
23 January 2026- BaFin publication date of the enforcement notice[https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Veroeffentlichungen/EN/Massnahmen/40c_neu_124_WpHG/neu/meldung_2026_01_23_baywa_ag_1_en.html].
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - Fine is minimal (€2,500), procedural (no market manipulation or fraud), and isolated to one late filing amid BayWa's broader crises (e.g., forecast withdrawal 6 Oct 2025[https://www.investegate.co.uk/announcement/eqs/baywa-ag-baywa-ord-shs--0ah7/eqs-adhoc-baywa-ag-baywa-ag-withdraws-f
The Federal Office of Justice in Germany imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft for failing to submit its consolidated accounting documents for the financial year 2024 within the prescribed period. This action highlights the importance of timely submission of financial reports. Companies must ensure compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code to avoid similar penalties.
What Changed
The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine due to a breach of section 325 of the German Commercial Code, which requires companies to submit their consolidated accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form within the prescribed period.
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of consolidated accounting documents for the purpose of disclosure to the operator of the German Federal Gazette in electronic form
Review and update internal procedures to comply with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
Key Dates
6 Nov 2025The Federal Office of Justice imposed a disciplinary fine on BayWa Aktiengesellschaft
Non-Compliance Risk
Disciplinary fine of up to 2,500 euros for non-compliance with section 325 of the German Commercial Code
We are seeking views on further rules for cryptoasset firms as the final step in our consultations on our crypto rules. We have made significant progress in delivering our crypto roadmap and are helping firms to meet our standards and get ready for when the gateway opens in September 2026.We have set out our proposals on how the Consumer Duty, conduct standards, redress and safeguarding will apply to cryptoasset firms. We are also seeking feedback on our proposed approach to international cry...
Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul S. Atkins and Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Michael S. Selig will hold a joint event on Tuesday, Jan. 27, from 10 a.m. to 11 a.m. at CFTC headquarters to discuss harmonization between the…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee announced that it will hold a public meeting at the SEC Headquarters in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday, Feb. 24, 2026, at 10 a.m. ET. The meeting will also be…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today approved the 2026 budget for the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and the related accounting support fee.The 2026 PCAOB budget totals $362.1 million. The 2026 budget reflects a 9.4% ($37.6…
The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates for appointment as members of the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, established pursuant to Section 39 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to help protect investors and improve securities…
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2025 accounts: the AMF flags up points for vigilance and issues recommendations
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the senior team from the Division of Corporation Finance responsible for advising division Director James Moloney on all matters the division has before the Commission. These include rulemaking…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Christina M. Thomas will rejoin the Division of Corporation Finance in February as deputy director and chief advisor on disclosure, policy, and rulemaking.“Christina brings her deep technical…
Supervision Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the role and involvement of the compliance function at investment services providers
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusi
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by mid-2026)
*Conduct impact assessment
*Review IRB permissions
*Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
*Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026– PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027– Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027– Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028– FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadline– Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessmentDEADLINE
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027Basel 3.1 rules take effectDEADLINE
1 Jan 2028Internal model approach for market risk takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based A
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by Q2 2026)
*Review applicability
*Assess impact
*Identify policy changes
*Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026- PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025- PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027- All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The restated CRR provisions take effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
PS4/26 finalizes the **simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)**, a tailored prudential framework designed to reduce regulatory burden while maintaining capital resilience for smaller, domestically-focused UK banks and building societies. This represents the completion of Phase 1 of the PRA's "Strong and Simple" initiative and introduces materially lighter capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements for qualifying firms, with implementation effective January 1, 2027.
What Changed
*Simplified Capital Framework
The final policy introduces a dedicated capital regime** for SDDTs that descopes them from standard CRR Firms requirements. SDDTs are now subject to tailored Pillar 2 methodologies (SoP5/25) and simplified ICAAP/SREP processes (SS4/25) rather than the standard frameworks.
*Liquidity Simplifications
Qualifying SDDTs with 50% or more retail deposit funding** are exempted from the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirements, replacing this with a simpler Retail Depos
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by January 20, 2026)
*Assess SDDT eligibility – Determine whether your firm meets all seven qualification criteria, particularly the £20bn asset threshold and domestic asset location requirement
*Review consolidation group structure – If part of a group, confirm which entity will serve as the SDDT consolidation entity responsible for certification
*Implement SoP2/23 changes – Adopt updated operating procedures for the SDDT regime
*Update ICAAP/ILAAP processes – Implement new frequency requirements for capital and liquidity adequacy assessments
Key Dates
January 20, 2026– PS4/26 published; changes to SoP2/23 and ICAAP/ILAAP frequency requirements take effect
January 20, 2026– Revocation of ICR firm/consolidation entity definitions and deletion of SoP3/23 effective
January 1, 2027– Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes effect; SS4/25 brought into effect in full; SDDTs removed from SS31/15 scope
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has introduced a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) to reduce regulatory complexity while maintaining adequate capital. The new regime will take effect on 2027-01-01. This change aims to simplify capital requirements for smaller banks and building societies.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced a new simplified capital regime for SDDTs, which includes changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy. The regime also introduces new reporting templates and instructions.
What You Need To Do
Review and update capital adequacy assessments to ensure compliance with the new simplified capital regime
Implement new reporting templates and instructions for SDDTs
Update internal policies and procedures to reflect changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy
Key Dates
20 Jan 2026Publication of the final policy statement
20 Jan 2026Early implementation of changes to ICAAP updates and reverse stress-testing
1 Jan 2027The SDDT capital regime takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, or license revocation for non-compliance with the new simplified capital regime
On 19 December 2025 the High Court approved the FCA’s proposals to distribute funds to Asset Land investors. The Court has directed the FCA to pay funds to investors in the Asset Land schemes who provide valid bank account details to the FCA on or before 20 February 2026.Investors who have not received previous communications from the FCA or who have not updated their contact information are requested to immediately contact the FCA using the details below.Please ensure this is completed no la...
The FCA has fined Russel Gerrity £309,843 for using inside information to net himself £128,765. As a consultant, Mr Gerrity had access to information about whether oil and gas had been discovered during the drilling of wells. Between October 2018 and January 2022, he took advantage of this and used inside information to buy shares in Chariot Oil & Gas Limited and Eco (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Plc ahead of announcements that increased their price. On another occasion, he used inside information t...
The CSSF's January 2026 enforcement report documents the results of its 2025 examination campaign on 2024 financial and non-financial disclosures by issuers under Luxembourg's Transparency Law. This publication is critical for compliance professionals because it reveals systematic compliance gaps across financial reporting (IFRS), sustainability reporting (ESRS), and Alternative Performance Measures (APMs), with 27% of enforcement decisions resulting in injunctions for non-compliance.
What Changed
The regulatory landscape has evolved significantly with the introduction of new sustainability reporting requirements:
ESRS Implementation (First Year): 2024 marked the first full reporting year under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), with the CSSF conducting a fact-finding exercise to assess reporting quality. The CSSF noted an overall increase in reporting quality with better-structured reports and more relevant disclosures, though key improvement areas remain in compreh
What You Need To Do
*Financial Information (IFRS)
*Enhanced Note Disclosures
*Cash Flow Statement Presentation
*Segment Reporting Completeness
*Going Concern Assessment
Key Dates
4 July 2025- European Commission adopted Delegated Act amending Taxonomy Disclosures (Omnibus package)
18 August 2025- CSSF published full results of fact-finding exercise on ESRS reporting
5 December 2024- CSSF published enforcement priorities press release for FY2024 reporting
January 2026- CSSF published enforcement results report (current publication)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that J. Russell “Rusty” McGranahan has been named SEC General Counsel. As the SEC’s chief legal officer, Mr. McGranahan will oversee the provision of legal expertise and advice to the Office of the…
On 07 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50.000 euros on pferdewetten.de AG.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG on November 7, 2025, for violations related to the publication of financial reports under German securities law (WpHG - Wertpapierhandelsgesetz). This enforcement action underscores regulatory expectations for timely and accurate financial disclosure compliance, particularly for publicly traded or regulated entities in the gaming/betting sector.
#
What Changed
Based on the enforcement context, the regulatory requirements at issue involve:
Financial Reporting Obligations: Entities subject to WpHG must publish financial reports in accordance with statutory deadlines and content requirements
Disclosure Standards: Reports must meet quality and completeness standards established under German securities law
Enforcement Mechanism: The BfJ has authority to impose disciplinary fines for non-compliance with publication requirements
No Safe Harbor: Delayed or d
What You Need To Do
*Audit Current Compliance
*Strengthen Internal Controls
*Document Procedures
*Monitor Deadlines
*Legal Review
Key Dates
November 7, 2025- BfJ imposed €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG
January 15, 2026- BaFin published enforcement action notice
Ongoing- WpHG financial reporting obligations remain in effect with no stated grace period modifications
On 07 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50.000 euros on pferdewetten.de AG.
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG on 7 November 2025 for violations related to the publication of financial reports under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). This enforcement action underscores BaFin's and BfJ's strict oversight of timely and accurate financial disclosures by public companies, serving as a warning to listed firms on the consequences of non-compliance. It matters because it highlights procedural lapses in ad-hoc publicity and annual reporting, potentially increasing scrutiny on similar entities amid ongoing regulatory emphasis on market integrity.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision enforcing existing obligations under § 37w WpHG (disciplinary measures for breaches of publication duties) and related provisions of the WpHG. Key requirements reiterated include:
Timely publication of annual financial reports and ad-hoc announcements via electronic means (e.g., DGAP platform).
Ensuring completeness and accuracy of published financial statements, including management reports.
Immediate correction of a
What You Need To Do
Conduct an internal audit of recent financial report publications (last 12-24 months) for timeliness, accuracy, and platform compliance (e
Implement or enhance pre-publication checklists, including dual approvals and automated validation tools to flag delays or errors
Train IR and compliance staff on WpHG §§ 15, 111-114 (ad-hoc and periodic reporting) and § 37w (sanctions)
Review outsourcing arrangements for reporting (e
Document remedial actions and report to the supervisory board; consider voluntary self-disclosure for any identified breaches to mitigate fines
Key Dates
07 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €50,000 disciplinary fine on pferdewetten.de AG.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters as a concrete example of BfJ's willingness to levy fines (here €50,000, modest but precedential) for reporting lapses, signaling heightened enforcement post-2025 ESMA-aligned updates to transparency rules. Firms with similar profiles face elevated audit risk, especially
On 7 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50,000 euros on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG on 7 November 2025 for failing to publish required financial reports, violating transparency obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). This enforcement action underscores BaFin's heightened focus on financial reporting compliance for listed companies, serving as a warning for timely and accurate disclosures amid strategic priorities on market integrity and early risk detection. Compliance teams should view it as a signal of rigorous enforcement against reporting lapses, potentially leading to escalated penalties for repeat or severe breaches.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement case applying existing WpHG requirements for periodic financial reporting by publicly listed entities. The case reinforces the statutory duty under Section 40c WpHG (as referenced in the BaFin publication title) to publish financial reports promptly, with BfJ acting as the disciplinary authority for such violations. It aligns with BaFin's ongoing risk-based enforcement on financial reporting for publicly traded companies, emphasizi
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of financial reporting processes to ensure compliance with WpHG Sections 37 et seq
Implement automated monitoring and reminders for publication deadlines (e
Strengthen internal controls, including pre-publication reviews by compliance and legal teams, with escalation to senior management
Train responsible personnel on disciplinary risks, documenting adherence to avoid BfJ fines (up to €5 million or 3% of turnover for severe cases)
For listed firms, integrate reporting into broader governance frameworks, aligning with BaFin's data-driven supervision expectations
Key Dates
7 November 2025- BfJ imposes €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG for financial reporting violations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This fine is modest (€50,000) and targets a specific reporting failure, not systemic issues like AML or IT deficiencies seen in larger cases (e.g., J.P. Morgan's €45 million fine). It matters as a precedent in BaFin's 2026-2029 strategy prioritizing market transparency, financial r
On 7 November 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50,000 euros on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG on 7 November 2025 for failing to publish required financial reports, highlighting enforcement of financial reporting obligations under German securities law (WpHG). This case underscores BaFin's and BfJ's commitment to market transparency and integrity, serving as a warning to listed companies on the consequences of non-compliance with ad-hoc and periodic reporting duties. Compliance professionals should note it as evidence of intensified scrutiny on reporting accuracy amid BaFin's 2026-2029 strategic priorities.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement action enforcing existing requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG § 124), which mandates timely publication of financial reports for publicly listed companies. The case reaffirms the disciplinary framework where BfJ, as the competent authority, can impose fines up to €700,000 (or 5% of turnover) for violations, with this €50,000 fine reflecting a proportionate measure for the breach. It aligns with BaFin's strate
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of financial reporting processes to ensure compliance with WpHG §§ 37c, 115, and 124 on publication of annual, half-yearly, and ad-hoc reports via electronic means (e
Implement automated monitoring and reminders for reporting deadlines, with dual sign-off by compliance and finance teams
Train management on personal liability for reporting failures, including documentation of internal controls to demonstrate due diligence in supervisory reviews
For firms with similar profiles, voluntarily self-report past lapses to BfJ/BaFin to potentially mitigate fines, referencing this case as precedent
Key Dates
7 November 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €50,000 disciplinary fine on TTL Beteiligungs- und Grundbesitz-AG for financial reporting violations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This fine, while modest, signals BfJ's active enforcement role in financial reporting, amplified by BaFin's 2026-2029 strategy prioritizing "market transparency and integrity" through increased monitoring of publicly traded companies. It matters because reporting breaches erode inv
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has today published its supervisory priorities for 2026, outlining in a letter its sector-specific priorities for the coming year to all banks, building societies, insurers and other PRA-regulated firms.
Circular CSSF 19/708 mandates the electronic transmission of specified documents to the CSSF via secure platforms like e-file or SOFiE, effective from February 1, 2019, replacing prior paper or other methods. This updated annex (as amended by Circular CSSF 21/790 and further revisions up to April 1, 2025) standardizes submissions for investment funds and related entities, reducing administrative burdens while ensuring document integrity and CSSF accessibility. Compliance professionals must monitor the dynamic annex list on the CSSF website to avoid nullified submissions.
#
What Changed
Mandatory Electronic-Only Submission: Documents listed in Annex I must be transmitted exclusively via e-file (http://www.e-file.lu) or SOFiE (http://www.cetrel-securities.lu/wp_static/what-do-we-offer/secured-reporting-channel-sofie-sort/), in PDF format supporting read access, printing, copy/paste, and word search; other methods post-February 1, 2019, are null and void.
Dynamic Annex Updates: The annex, published on the CSSF website, is regularly updated (e.g., latest noted April 1, 2025) and i
What You Need To Do
Register/access e-file or SOFiE platforms if not already (test/production environments available since February 2019)
Consult and adhere to the latest Annex I for document list, nomenclatures, and formats (PDF with full functionality)
Ensure submissions are final/official versions matching hard copies; use specified identifiers for UCIs/SIFs/SICARs
Implement processes for automatic/manual transmission (e
Train staff on responsibilities and integrate into reporting workflows; reference CSSF FAQs for closing documents
Key Dates
1 February 2019 - Entry into forceMandatory electronic transmission for listed documents; non-electronic submissions null and void.
28 January 2019 - Publication dateof original Circular CSSF 19/708.
22 December 2021 - Amendmentby Circular CSSF 21/790.
1 April 2025 - Latest annex updatenoted.
Ongoing - Regular checks requiredEntities must monitor CSSF website for annex updates.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low (for new implementations post-2019; medium for ongoing monitoring). This matters for operational efficiency and CSSF relations, as non-compliance risks rejected filings, delays (e.g., approvals under SFDR processes), or supervisory scrutiny, but long-standing rule (since 2019) with esta
ESMA’s Digital and Data strategies support supervision of EU financial markets 13 January 2026 About ESMA Market data Press Releases The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has adopted a new Digital Strategy and updated its Data Strategy . They reflect ESMA’s commitment to smarter regulatory reporting and technology-driven supervision, promote synergies and innovation while reducing unnecessary complexity. The digital strategy...
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 1 der Verordnung vom 28. März 2018 über Massnahmen gegenüber Venezuela (SR 946.231.178.5) publiziert.
AI Analysis
On January 13, 2026, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measures against Venezuela (SR 946.231.178.5), reflecting changes to the list of designated persons and entities subject to Swiss asset freezing measures. This update is critical for Swiss financial institutions and regulated entities as it directly impacts sanctions compliance obligations and requires immediate verification of client and counterparty lists against the revised designations.
What Changed
The regulatory update modifies the designated persons list under Switzerland's unilateral freezing measures against Venezuela. While the search results reference a separate FINMA ordinance (RS 196.127.85) adopted on January 5, 2026, which froze assets of 37 persons in the context of Venezuela, the January 13 update to SR 946.231.178.5 represents an amendment to Switzerland's broader sanctions ordinance framework. The specific changes to Annex 1 require Swiss entities to:
Update their sanctions
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Screening
*Asset Identification
*Freeze Implementation
*Notification
*Transaction Review
Key Dates
January 5, 2026- FINMA ordinance on asset freezing (RS 196.127.85) enters into force at 11 a.m., freezing assets of 37 designated persons
January 13, 2026- SECO publishes updated Annex 1 to SR 946.231.178.5 (the update referenced in your query)
Immediate- Compliance obligations commence upon publication; no grace period for implementationDEADLINE
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell have been named as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement. Mr. Tzur joined the Commission on January 6, 2026, as the Deputy Director overseeing the…
AI Analysis
The SEC announced on January 12, 2026, the appointment of Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement, with Tzur joining on January 6, 2026, to oversee key operations. This personnel change is part of a broader reorganization replacing Regional Directors with Deputy Directors for more centralized oversight of investigations. It matters for compliance teams as it signals greater consistency in enforcement approaches, potentially affecting investigation timelines, Wells process strategies, and settlement negotiations across SEC-regulated entities.
#
What Changed
This announcement reflects structural reforms rather than new substantive regulations:
Replacement of Regional Directors with Deputy Directors, centralizing reporting from local offices (e.g., Boston, Fort Worth, Atlanta) and specialized units directly to headquarters-led Deputy Directors.
Enhanced supervision of enforcement decisions, aiming for consistency and reduced regional variations in handling investigations.
Complements parallel Wells process reforms under Chairman Paul Atkins, includin
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal protocols for SEC investigations to align with centralized reporting structures, anticipating uniform standards across regions
Train legal/compliance staff on refined Wells process (e
Monitor upcoming SEC communications for Enforcement Director Judge Margaret Ryan's guidance on fraud-focused priorities
Assess current or potential matters for earlier engagement with Deputy Directors on case theories and resolutions
Key Dates
January 6, 2026- Paul H. Tzur joins SEC as Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement.[User Query]
January 12, 2026- SEC announces appointments of Paul Tzur and David Morrell as Deputy Directors.[User Query]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters due to its role in ongoing SEC transition under Chairman Atkins and Director Ryan, promising more predictable enforcement but requiring adaptation to centralized decision-making and Wells enhancements. While not imposing immediate obligations, it could accelerate case r
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on BigRep SE on 12 January 2026 for failing to publish its half-yearly financial report as of 30 June 2025, as required under Article 4 of Luxembourg's Transparency Law of 11 January 2008 (as amended). This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's rigorous supervision of periodic disclosure obligations for issuers with Luxembourg as their home Member State, serving as a reminder of the consequences for non-compliance with transparency requirements. Compliance professionals should note this as evidence of ongoing CSSF scrutiny on timely reporting, with potential fines scaled based on circumstances per Article 26a.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the Transparency Law of 11 January 2008 (as amended), specifically Article 4, which mandates issuers to publish half-yearly financial reports, including effective dissemination, storage on the Officially Appointed Mechanism (OAM), and filing with the CSSF. No new rules are introduced; the sanction reinforces the unchanged deadlines and processes for periodic information publication, with the CSSF
What You Need To Do
All affected parties
BigRep SE specifically
wide actions are mandated beyond general adherence, but proactive audits are advisable given CSSF's supervisory focus
Key Dates
30 June 2025- Period-end date for the required half-yearly financial report that BigRep SE failed to publish.DEADLINE
12 January 2026- Date of administrative sanction imposition by CSSF and publication of the decision.
Within 3 months of 12 January 2026(i.e., by 12 April 2026) - Deadline for BigRep SE to lodge a court action with the Tribunal administratif against the sanction, per Article 27 of the Transparency Law.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This matters as a specific enforcement example in CSSF's ongoing verification of periodic information publication, signaling heightened scrutiny rather than a systemic shift. While the €10,000 fine is modest, it demonstrates fines for even isolated breaches (scaled per Article 26a)
This CSSF publication, dated January 12, 2026, identifies the specific population (likely a firm or individual) subject to an enforcement action, such as an administrative sanction, as part of the CSSF's transparency in supervisory measures. It matters because it signals CSSF's active enforcement priorities, potentially in areas like AML or reporting failures, enabling firms to assess similar risks in their operations and strengthen compliance to avoid parallel actions. Published amid rising focus on financial crime typologies like sexual extortion, it underscores the regulator's commitment to public accountability.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced in this publication, as it is an enforcement notice rather than a circular or guideline. It serves as a disclosure of an ongoing or concluded enforcement case, aligning with CSSF's practice of publishing sanction details to deter non-compliance and inform the market, without altering existing rules.
#
What You Need To Do
For the named population
For all supervised firms
Update internal policies, train staff on enforcement precedents, and ensure robust reporting under Circular CSSF 19/726 or Transparency Law obligations
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate relevance for the named party facing direct consequences; medium-to-high for peers due to CSSF's pattern of public enforcements signaling heightened scrutiny on financial crime, especially amid rising OCSE/FSEC cases noted in recent CSSF guidance. It matters as it could pre
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold its third and final outreach event to help firms comply with amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, which is focused on small firms, is open to in-person or virtual attendance, and is…
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Premium Capital Management (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on 11 September 2025 against alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Premium Capital Management for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties, signaling heightened scrutiny on timely supervisory cooperation amid ongoing AML risks in Luxembourg. Compliance teams should view this as a reminder of the low tolerance for even administrative lapses, with potential for escalated fines in repeat cases.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement precedent under existing rules: non-compliance with Article 5(1) of the AML/CFT Law, which mandates annual submission of a financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") to the CSSF. The fine was calculated per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a), considering circumstances under Article 8-5(1). Publication followed Article 8-6(1) after a proportionality assessment, confirming no market stability risks. No new requirements were introduced;
What You Need To Do
Immediately review internal processes for annual Questionnaire submission, ensuring calendar invites and automated reminders for the 4 April deadline (covering prior year-end data)
Conduct a gap analysis on AML/CFT cooperation obligations under Article 5(1), including response protocols to CSSF reminders or queries
Update compliance calendars and train staff on escalation procedures; document all submissions with proof (e
If late, proactively submit overdue items and request meetings if needed, as non-response forfeits mitigation opportunities
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference year-end for the financial crime Questionnaire.
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for Questionnaire submission to CSSF.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine after non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Publication date of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This €10,000 fine for a straightforward reporting failure demonstrates CSSF's willingness to penalize non-cooperation swiftly, even without aggravating factors, but the amount is modest and targeted at administrative breaches. It matters as a warning shot in Luxembourg's AML landsc
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Sunbricks GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a **€10,000 administrative fine on Sunbricks GP S.à r.l.**, an alternative investment fund manager, for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the April 4, 2025 deadline, despite two formal reminders. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's strict approach to cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework and signals that non-submission of required compliance documentation—even without evidence of underlying financial crime—triggers regulatory penalties.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action clarifying existing obligations:
Mandatory Annual Questionnaire Requirement: All professionals supervised, authorized, or registered by the CSSF must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by April 4 each year, covering the preceding calendar year.
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on AML/CFT establishes a non-negotiable duty to cooperate with the CSSF, which includes timely su
What You Need To Do
regulated entities must
*Establish Calendar Controls
*Designate Responsible Parties
*Prepare Documentation
*Monitor Communications
Key Dates
April 4, 2025– Annual financial crime questionnaire submission deadline (for year ending December 31, 2024)DEADLINE
Before September 11, 2025– Two reminder notices issued by CSSF to Sunbricks GP
September 11, 2025– Administrative fine decision date; questionnaire still not submitted
January 9, 2026– Publication date of enforcement decision
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Capitalis Premiere Group (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Capitalis Premiere Group on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties, signaling heightened scrutiny on timely supervisory cooperation for Luxembourg-regulated entities. Compliance teams should note this as a low-value but public reminder of potential fines for administrative lapses in AML processes.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement precedent under existing rules: non-compliance with the annual financial crime questionnaire submission, mandated by Article 5(1) of the AML/CFT Law, triggers fines per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a). The CSSF considered all relevant circumstances under Article 8-5(1) to set the €10,000 fine amount and published the sanction nominatively after proportionality assessment per Article 8-6(1), confirming no market stabi
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of annual financial crime questionnaires by 4 April each year (for prior calendar year data); implement calendar reminders and escalation processes for CSSF requests
Respond promptly to CSSF reminders or queries on AML/CFT compliance to avoid escalation to fines; document any delays with justification evidence
No retroactive actions needed for this case, but conduct gap analysis on reporting workflows to prevent similar breaches
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submitting the annual financial crime questionnaire covering the year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine on Capitalis Premiere Group for non-submission.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This €10,000 fine is modest but publicly names the firm, amplifying reputational risk in Luxembourg's competitive fund domicile; it matters as a clear CSSF signal of zero tolerance for basic cooperation failures in AML, potentially foreshadowing stricter enforcement amid EU AML har
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Lion Management (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on Lion Management, an alternative investment fund manager, on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's commitment to enforcing cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing framework, with direct implications for all AIFMs regarding timely compliance with supervisory reporting requirements.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action clarifying existing obligations. However, it reinforces critical compliance requirements:
Mandatory Annual Questionnaire Submission: All CSSF-supervised professionals, including AIFMs, must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by the specified deadline (in this case, 4 April 2025 for the year ending 31 December 2024).
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on the fight against mon
What You Need To Do
*Establish Calendar Controls
*Designate Responsible Parties
*Monitor CSSF Communications
*Document Submission
*Escalate Non-Compliance Immediately
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submission of annual financial crime questionnaire for year ending 31 December 2024DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed administrative fine after two reminders went unheeded
9 January 2026- Publication date of the administrative sanction decision
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Agriland Management S.A. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), Luxembourg's financial regulator, imposed a **EUR 10,000 administrative fine on Agriland Management S.A.**, an alternative investment fund manager, on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the April 2025 deadline. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's commitment to enforcing cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework and signals heightened scrutiny of compliance with supervisory reporting requirements.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action that clarifies existing obligations:
Mandatory Annual Reporting: All CSSF-supervised professionals must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by 4 April each year, covering the preceding calendar year.
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on AML/CFT establishes a non-negotiable duty to cooperate with the CSSF, including timely submission of requested documentation.
Enforcement Esc
What You Need To Do
*Establish Reporting Calendars
*Designate Responsible Personnel
*Respond to Regulatory Requests
*Document Justifications
*Monitor Supervisory Communications
Key Dates
4 April 2025– Deadline for submission of financial crime questionnaire for year ending 31 December 2024DEADLINE
Before 11 September 2025– Two reminder notices issued by CSSF to Agriland Management S.A.
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Bedrock I GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Bedrock I GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties and serves as a public warning to supervised entities on timely supervisory compliance. It matters because it demonstrates that even modest fines are pursued for basic reporting lapses, potentially signaling heightened scrutiny on AIFMs' AML processes amid ongoing regulatory focus on financial crime risks.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT Law). Specifically, it reaffirms the mandatory annual submission of the CSSF's financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") by supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, as part of the cooperation duty in Article 5(1). The fine was cal
What You Need To Do
Immediately verify submission status of the 2024 Questionnaire (or any outstanding); if overdue, submit promptly with justification to mitigate further escalation
Implement automated calendar alerts and internal workflows for all CSSF reporting deadlines, including annual AML/CFT Questionnaire
Conduct a compliance gap analysis on cooperation obligations under Article 5(1) AML/CFT Law, documenting reminder responses and evidence retention
Train senior managers and compliance teams on supervisory interactions, including rights to request in-person meetings before fines
Review governance for timely escalation of CSSF reminders to decision-makers
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference period end for the Questionnaire covering financial crime compliance.DEADLINE
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for Questionnaire submission to CSSF.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date of administrative fine imposition (€10,000) after non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Publication date of the sanction decision by CSSF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a post-facto enforcement on a past breach (2024 reporting cycle), with the €10,000 fine relatively low, indicating proportionality for a first-time or isolated lapse. It matters as a leading indicator of CSSF's 2025-2026 focus on AML cooperation, with multiple similar AIFM
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties and serves as a public warning to supervised entities on the consequences of non-cooperation. It matters because it demonstrates that even modest fines will be levied for procedural lapses, potentially signaling increased scrutiny on timely AML compliance submissions amid broader regulatory focus on financial crime risks.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended AML/CFT Law:
Annual Questionnaire Submission: Supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, must submit an annual financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") to CSSF as part of the cooperation duty in Article 5(1).
Fine Provisions: Fines are imposed per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a), with amounts determined by relevant
What You Need To Do
Immediate Review
Remediation if Late
Process Enhancements
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference year-end for the financial crime Questionnaire.
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for submitting the Questionnaire for the year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine after noting non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a low-value fine (€10,000) for a procedural breach, not involving substantive AML failures like suspicious transactions or sanctions screening delays seen in higher fines (e.g., €185,000 on Rakuten Bank). It matters as a precedent for CSSF's willingness to publicly name-and
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager C5 S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of reporting duties in AML/CFT compliance, serving as a warning to supervised entities on the consequences of administrative delays. It matters because it highlights low-tolerance for even minor procedural lapses, potentially signaling increased scrutiny on annual reporting amid broader AML/CFT priorities.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended AML/CFT Law:
Article 5(1) mandates supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, to cooperate fully with CSSF, including submitting the annual financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire").
Breach occurred due to non-submission of the 2024 year-end Questionnaire, with fine determined per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), 8-4(3)(a), and 8-
What You Need To Do
Review and confirm timely submission of all pending or future CSSF financial crime questionnaires; establish automated calendar reminders for annual deadlines (e
Implement escalation protocols for CSSF reminders, ensuring immediate response and submission within days, not weeks
Conduct internal audit of AML/CFT cooperation obligations, documenting justifications for any delays and preparing evidence for potential CSSF hearings or meetings
Update compliance policies to prioritize Article 5(1) duties, including training for responsible persons on fine risks under Article 8-4
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submission of financial crime Questionnaire covering year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed €10,000 administrative fine on C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. for non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication announcing the sanction.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to CSSF's demonstrated willingness to impose and publicize fines for straightforward reporting failures, even at €10,000, which could escalate for repeat or severe cases; acts as a precedent amid rising AML/CFT enforcement (e.g., larger fines like €214,000 in similar co
Administrative sanction imposed on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A.
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €102,000 administrative fine on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A. on 23 July 2025 for breaches in its professional obligations as a depositary of non-financial assets under the AIFM Law, identified during an on-site inspection from February 2023 to January 2024 covering activities up to December 2022. This enforcement action highlights CSSF's scrutiny of depositary functions, particularly risk assessment and oversight controls, serving as a warning for similar entities to strengthen compliance amid rising supervisory focus on AIFM depositaries.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it enforces existing requirements under Article 51(1) (1st and 7th indents) and Article 51(2) (1st sub-paragraph, 3rd indent) of the amended Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs (AIFM Law), and related provisions like Article 92(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 (CDR 231/2013). Key breaches include: failure to properly assess risks tied to AIFs' strategies and AIFMs' organization for oversight processes; lack of processes to ve
What You Need To Do
related entities) must
Conduct immediate gap analyses on risk assessment processes for AIF strategies and AIFM organization per Article 92(1) CDR 231/2013
Implement robust verification processes for AIFM compliance with asset delegation rules
Ensure availability of key documentation and evidence of controls for the depositary function, addressing pre-2022 gaps if applicable
Develop and test oversight processes, leveraging self-identified improvements and action plans as mitigating factors, as JTC did prior to inspection
Key Dates
February 2023 - January 2024Period of CSSF on-site inspection on depositary obligations, covering activities up to December 2022.
23 July 2025Date CSSF imposed the €102,000 administrative fine on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A.
9 January 2026Date of official CSSF publication announcing the sanction.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This matters due to the fine's size (€102,000), reflecting breach accumulation, severity, and duration, despite JTC's partial remediation; it signals intensified CSSF on-site scrutiny of depositary functions post-2023 inspections, with potential for higher penalties absent proactive
Long Form Report – Practical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by investment firms – Mission and related reports of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors)
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation today published and delivered to Congress its 2025 staff report that serves as a comprehensive and data-rich resource on capital-raising dynamics…
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
Update of Circular CSSF 24/853 on the Long Form Report (as amended by Circular CSSF 25/870) – Practical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by investment firms Mission and related reports of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/904 updates Circular CSSF 24/853 (as amended by Circular CSSF 25/870) by introducing a revised Long Form Report (LFR) for investment firms, featuring a digital self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) and enhanced auditor reports focused on AML/CFT and risk management. This matters because it aligns reporting with CSSF's risk-based supervision under CSSF 4.0, reduces redundancies, applies proportionality based on business models, and mandates digital submission to improve efficiency and data analysis.
#
What Changed
Revised LFR Structure: Comprises four parts in a single digital document: (1) yearly SAQ completed by investment firms; (2) descriptive elements verified by approved statutory auditors (REAs); (3) AML/CFT report with risk assessments, declarations on audits, and data on incomplete fund transfers; (4) REA's independent assessment of ML/FT risks and organizational aspects.
Digital Format: Completion and submission via CSSF's online portal, supporting CSSF 4.0 digital strategy for efficient process
What You Need To Do
Investment Firms
REAs/Auditors
Key Dates
Financial year ending 31 December 2024- Applicability of revised LFR to all investment firms; submissions begin for this period onward on a yearly basis.
No specific submission deadline stated- Yearly production required via CSSF portal; firms should align with existing annual reporting cycles for auditors (typically post-year-end).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Applies immediately to FY ending 31 December 2024 reports, requiring swift updates to reporting processes, digital tools, and AML/CFT documentation amid CSSF's risk-based shift; non-compliance risks supervisory actions, as LFR directly informs CSSF oversight on key prudential/AML are
Pension schemes must now publish transparent data on their performance, costs, and service quality, according to new proposals from the FCA, DWP, and TPR. Pension schemes will need to publish clear data on their performance, costs and quality of service, under proposals announced today by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and The Pensions Regulator (TPR). If a pension offers poor value, firms and trustees must then fix it by moving savers to bet...
This page contains information about fines published during 2026. The total amount of fines so far is £371,700. Firm or individual finedDateAmountReasonRichard Adam07/01/2026£232,800The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Rule 1.3.3R, Listing Principle 1 and Premium Listing Principle 2.Zafar Khan07/01/2026£138,900The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Ru...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed amendments to the rules that define which registered investment companies, investment advisers, and business development companies qualify as small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility…
AI Analysis
The SEC proposed amendments on January 7, 2026, to expand the definitions of "small entities" under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) for registered investment advisers (RIAs), investment companies, and business development companies by significantly raising asset thresholds last updated in 1998. This would increase the number of qualifying small entities, enabling the SEC to better assess regulatory impacts and potentially provide tailored relief like extended compliance timelines during rulemaking. It matters because it could indirectly reduce compliance burdens for mid-sized firms by influencing future SEC rules to minimize disproportionate effects on smaller players.
#
What Changed
Raise the RAUM threshold for RIAs to qualify as small entities from $25 million to $1 billion, with conforming changes for control affiliates.
Increase the net asset threshold for investment companies from $50 million to $10 billion.
Update aggregation of related funds from "group of related investment companies" to "family of investment companies" as defined in Form N-CEN for easier identification.
Introduce inflation adjustments to thresholds every 10 years via SEC order, without formal rulema
What You Need To Do
Submit public comments by the deadline to influence thresholds, alternatives (e
Monitor Federal Register for exact publication and comment instructions; review proposed rule and fact sheet on SEC site (https://www
Assess internal status
No immediate compliance changes, as this affects SEC rulemaking process only; prepare for potential indirect impacts via future rules
Key Dates
January 7, 2026- SEC issues proposal and press release.
60 days after Federal Register publication- Public comment period closes (publication expected shortly after January 7; exact date TBD, likely March 2026 based on estimates).
No stated adoption date- Typically at least one year post-comment period under normal processes.
Every 10 years post-adoption- Inflation adjustments to thresholds via SEC order.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This proposal does not impose direct new requirements or alter existing obligations—it's procedural for SEC's RFA analyses during rulemaking. However, adoption could lead to meaningful indirect benefits for mid-sized RIAs and funds, such as longer compliance phases or reduced burden
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
This Statistical Notice 2026/01 from the Bank of England specifies the submission deadline for the Eligible Liabilities Return form, which calculates firms' contributions to the Bank of England Levy for the 2026/27 levy year. It matters because non-compliance risks penalties, late fees, or enforcement actions under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, ensuring timely funding for the Bank's resolution and stability functions. Compliance teams must integrate this into levy reporting calendars to avoid operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The notice updates definitions and guidance in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder, focusing on the deadline for submitting the Eligible Liabilities Return (ELR) form for the 2026/27 levy year. It does not introduce new substantive rules but reinforces procedural requirements for accurate levy base calculations, such as eligible liabilities as defined in section 15 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013. No specific changes to levy rates or methodologies are detailed, but it aligns
What You Need To Do
Review and calculate eligible liabilities as of 31 December 2026 using BoE definitions from the Yellow Folder
Submit completed ELR form electronically via BoE portal by the specified deadline (likely 31 January 2027)
Retain audit trails, supporting data, and reconciliations for potential PRA/BoE queries
Update internal systems and controls for levy calculation; notify compliance teams if data gaps exist
Monitor BoE portal for form updates or extensions
Key Dates
31 January 2027- Deadline for submission of Eligible Liabilities Return form for Levy Year 2026/27 (inferred as standard end-January deadline post-levy year-end, aligned with historical BoE notices; confirm via Yellow Folder for exact day).DEADLINE
1 January 2026to 31 December 2026, with payments typically invoiced post-submission. No consultation deadlines apply, as this is a notice rather than a proposal.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Missing the submission deadline triggers automatic late penalties (e.g., interest at Bank Rate + 5%) and potential supervisory referrals. This directly impacts prudential reporting obligations, with firms facing cash flow hits from levy payments (historically £200-300m total annually
On 12 November the PRA hosted a roundtable meeting with Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of systemically important firms operating in the UK, to discuss Future Banking Data (FBD).
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
ESMA publishes report on cross-border marking of funds including statistics on notifications 06 January 2026 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its third report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under the Regulation on cross-border distribution of funds . For the first time, the report includes statistics on notifications of cross-border marketing of funds. Drawing on input from Na...
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
ESMA launches selection of Consolidated Tape Provider for OTC derivatives 05 January 2026 MiFID - Secondary Markets Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is launching the first selection procedure for the Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for over the counter (OTC) derivatives. Entities interested to apply are encouraged to register and submit their requests to participate in the selection procedure by 11 February 20...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched the first selection procedure for a **Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for OTC derivatives**, with applications due by 11 February 2026 and a decision expected by early July 2026. This initiative establishes a critical market infrastructure component to enhance transparency and efficiency in the EU's OTC derivatives market by consolidating post-trade data into a single, continuous electronic stream.
What Changed
The regulatory framework introduces several substantive requirements:
CTP Mandate: The selected provider will consolidate post-trade data from trading venues and other data contributors into a unified electronic stream, enabling market participants to access accurate, timely information.
Data Scope: The CTP will collect and disseminate OTC derivatives data in accordance with ESMA's Final Report on transparency for derivatives, with specific technical standards governing pre- and post-trade tra
What You Need To Do
*For prospective CTP applicants
*For trading venues and data contributors
trade OTC derivatives data to the selected CTP from 1 March 2027
minute maximum delay for real-time dissemination
*For market participants
Key Dates
11 February 2026– Deadline for entities to register and submit requests to participate in the selection procedureDEADLINE
Early July 2026– ESMA to adopt reasoned decision on selected applicant
1 September 2026– Mandatory use of new OTC derivatives identifying reference data (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1003)
1 March 2027– Single application date for all derivatives-related changes: amendments to RTS 2, Package Order RTS, and OTC derivatives CTP data requirements
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cicely LaMothe, Deputy Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, has retired from the agency.“Cicely has gone above and beyond the call of duty over the past twenty-four years to serve…
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 31 December 2025
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49 is a **mandatory quarterly reporting requirement** for Luxembourg credit institutions and postal financial service providers to submit data on covered deposits as of December 31, 2025. This survey directly feeds into the Single Resolution Fund's annual target level calculation and the Luxembourg deposit guarantee scheme's contribution assessments, making it essential for regulatory compliance and fund management.
What Changed
The circular explicitly states that no substantive changes have been made to the survey process compared to previous quarters. The only modifications are administrative: the reference date (December 31, 2025) and the submission deadline (January 30, 2026). The specifications for data collection, definitions of covered and eligible deposits, and reporting methodologies remain unchanged from prior circulars, particularly Circular CSSF-CPDI 16/02 as amended by Circular CSSF-CPDI 23/35.
What You Need To Do
*Calculate covered deposits as defined in Article 163 of the 2015 law, including balance and accrued interest (even if not yet due)
*Report eligible deposits after applying exclusions under Article 172 of the 2015 law, including exclusions for financial institutions and life insurance products
*Distinguish deposit types by reporting
Total eligible deposits (field 201)
Eligible deposits in omnibus accounts, fiduciary accounts, trusts, sub-accounts, and segregated accounts (field 0226)
Key Dates
January 30, 2026- Deadline for transmitting average covered deposits data to the Single Resolution BoardDEADLINE
ESMA publishes latest Spotlight on Markets newsletter featuring updates on market integration and transparency 23 December 2025 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published the latest edition of its Spotlight on Markets newsletter. This edition opens with ESMA welcoming the European Commission’s ambitious proposal on market integration, underlining the importance of deeper, more integrated and ef...
AI Analysis
ESMA's latest *Spotlight on Markets* newsletter (November/December 2025 issue, published 23 December 2025) summarizes key regulatory updates on EU market integration, transparency enhancements, and supervisory actions, including welcoming the European Commission's market integration proposal and announcing an equity consolidated tape provider (CTP) selection. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals accelerating EU efforts to deepen capital markets integration, improve data transparency, and strengthen oversight under MiFID II and DORA, potentially requiring firms to adapt governance, reporting, and conflict management practices.
#
What Changed
ESMA welcomes the European Commission's 4 December 2025 legislative package on market integration, emphasizing robust governance and market infrastructure for deeper EU capital markets.
Announcement of selected applicant for the equity consolidated tape provider (CTP), advancing MiFIR transparency for equity markets by improving post-trade data consolidation and access.
Publication of ESMA's final report on Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for non-equity transparency, clarifying pre- and pos
What You Need To Do
Review the final non-equity transparency RTS and assess impacts on trading and reporting systems for compliance by any upcoming application dates (not specified)
Evaluate MiFID II conflicts of interest policies in preparation for the CSA; conduct internal audits and enhance training/staff attestations on identification and mitigation
Monitor equity CTP rollout for changes to post-trade data access and costs; update vendor contracts if applicable
For DORA-impacted firms, map exposures to designated critical ICT providers and strengthen due diligence, contractual clauses, and exit strategies
Asset managers
Key Dates
4 December 2025- European Commission publishes market integration legislative package; legislative process expected to take at least one year.
23 December 2025- Newsletter publication date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - The newsletter highlights finalized standards (e.g., RTS, CTP) and imminent actions (e.g., CSA, DORA designations) that require proactive preparation, but lacks hard deadlines or immediate mandates. It matters because it previews intensified supervision on transparency, conflicts,
Update of Circular CSSF 24/850 on the practical rules concerning the descriptive report and the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted on an annual basis by support PFS, as well as the engagement of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of support PFS and practical rules concerning the management letter and the separate report to be drawn up on an annual basis.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/903 updates Circular CSSF 24/850, refining practical rules for support Professional of the Financial Sector (support PFS) in Luxembourg regarding their annual descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, and the roles of approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés). It specifies requirements for auditors' engagement, management letters, and separate annual reports. This matters for support PFS as it enhances supervisory oversight, ensures consistent reporting quality, and strengthens internal controls, directly impacting compliance and audit processes amid CSSF's focus on robust PFS supervision.
#
What Changed
Updates to Descriptive Report and Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Refines content, format, and submission requirements for support PFS's annual submissions, emphasizing more detailed disclosures on operations, risks, and controls (building on CSSF 24/850).
Auditor Engagement Rules: Introduces specific practical guidelines for approved statutory auditors, including mandatory scope of work, independence confirmations, and standardized procedures for reviewing support PFS reports.
Management Letter
What You Need To Do
*Review and Update Processes
*Engage/Confirm Auditors
*Implement Templates and Testing
*Training and Governance
*Submit on Time
Key Dates
1 January 2026 - Effective DateApplies to annual reporting cycles starting for financial year 2025 onwards.
30 April (annually) - Submission DeadlineSupport PFS must submit descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, management letter, and separate auditor report to CSSF by 30 April following the financial year-end (first applicable: 30 April 2026 for FY 2025).DEADLINE
31 December 2025 - Preparation MilestoneAuditors must be engaged and initial scoping completed by year-end 2025 for FY 2025 compliance.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This is high urgency for support PFS due to the impending 30 April 2026 deadline for FY 2025 submissions, with non-compliance risking supervisory fines, license reviews, or reputational damage under CSSF's PFS enforcement regime. It matters as it tightens audit accountability, potenti
Repeal of Circular CSSF 19/731 regarding the documents to be submitted on an annual basis by credit institutions.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/902 repeals Circular CSSF 19/731 (as amended by Circular CSSF 19/710), which previously detailed annual document submission requirements for credit institutions, shifting to a dynamic list published on the CSSF website. This matters because it streamlines compliance by centralizing and updating requirements online, reducing reliance on static circulars while maintaining submission obligations. Credit institutions must transition to the new process to avoid disruptions in prudential reporting.
#
What Changed
Repeal of prior circulars: Circular CSSF 19/731 and its amendment via Circular CSSF 19/710 are fully repealed, eliminating the fixed list of annual submission documents.
Shift to website-based guidance: The updated list of required documents, affected entity categories, electronic submission channels, and deadlines is now published on the CSSF’s Prudential reporting for credit institutions webpage, including an interactive summary table for determining applicable submissions.
Ongoing obligations
What You Need To Do
Review the CSSF Prudential reporting webpage (https://www
Update internal reporting processes, templates, and workflows to reference the website instead of the repealed circular
Confirm ongoing annual submissions via specified electronic channels; test interactive table for applicability to the institution's profile
Archive references to Circular CSSF 19/731 in policies and train staff on the change
Key Dates
23 December 2025- Publication and effective date of Circular CSSF 25/902, repealing Circular CSSF 19/731; transition to website-based list begins.
12 December 2019- Original issuance of repealed Circular CSSF 19/731 (archived on 23 December 2025).
1 January 2025).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – The repeal does not alter core submission obligations but requires procedural updates to avoid non-compliance with potentially evolving lists under CRR3 alignments. It matters for operational efficiency, as failure to adapt could lead to missed deadlines or incorrect submissions, e
Practical rules concerning the descriptive report and the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted on an annual basis by support PFS.Engagement of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of support PFS and practical rules concerning the management letter and the separate report to be drawn up on an annual basis.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 24/850, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/903, establishes practical rules for support Professional of the Financial Sector (support PFS) in Luxembourg to submit annual descriptive reports and self-assessment questionnaires, while also defining the roles of approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés) in issuing management letters and separate reports. This guidance standardizes supervisory reporting and audit processes to enhance oversight of support PFS, which provide essential back-office services to authorized PFS. It matters because non-compliance risks supervisory sanctions, reputational damage, and operational disruptions for entities reliant on support PFS structures.
#
What Changed
Standardized Reporting Templates: Introduces detailed formats and content requirements for the annual descriptive report and self-assessment questionnaire, covering governance, risk management, internal controls, and operational metrics specific to support PFS activities (e.g., IT services, administrative support, custody).
Auditor Engagement Rules: Mandates approved statutory auditors to perform specific procedures, issue a management letter highlighting control weaknesses, and prepare a separa
What You Need To Do
Annual Reporting Cycle
February to review submissions, test controls, and issue management letter (flagging deficiencies) plus separate compliance report
Governance Updates
Auditor Coordination
Record-Keeping
Key Dates
31 March annually- Deadline for submission of descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, management letter, and separate auditor report to CSSF (first applicable for FY 2024 reporting due 31 March 2025).DEADLINE
1 January 2025- Effective date of original Circular CSSF 24/850.
15 December 2025- Effective date of amendments in Circular CSSF 25/903, applicable to 2025 reporting cycle onwards.
End of February annually- Support PFS must engage auditors and provide necessary data to enable timely report preparation.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This is a recurring annual obligation with a firm 31 March deadline, where delays trigger automatic CSSF notifications and potential fines (up to €250,000 per Law 1993). It matters for support PFS as it intensifies scrutiny on operational resilience in a post-SFI (2021) landscape, wh
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers AMF Enforcement Committee fines the depositary CACEIS Bank for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined CACEIS Bank €3.5 million and issued a warning on 17 December 2025 for breaches of its professional obligations as depositary for seven French-law UCITS funds managed by H2O AM LLP (later transferred to H2O AM Europe). This decision underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of depositary oversight duties, particularly in verifying fund managers' investment monitoring systems, asset valuations, and compliance with prospectus constraints like issuer limits and security ratings. It matters for compliance teams as it highlights personal accountability risks and potential fines for inadequate due diligence in fund depositary roles, signaling heightened scrutiny amid past H2O fund issues.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing obligations under French UCITS rules (transposing UCITS Directive V) for depositaries. Key upheld objections include:
Failure to perform sufficient checks on the asset management company's (AMC) systems for monitoring UCITS investment ratios and valuing unlisted securities.
Inadequate verification of investment decision legality, such as compliance with prospectus limits on debt security ratings, derivative types, and
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance oversight processes
Training and audits
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
17 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date: €3.5M fine and warning imposed on CACEIS Bank.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (Dec 2025) decision directly impacts depositaries with €3.5M precedent for oversight failures, amid AMF's pattern of multi-million fines (e.g., €5.67M total in related 2024 case involving CACEIS). It elevates risks for UCITS/AIF depositaries handling non-standard assets,
On 16 December 2025, BaFin imposed two administrative fines amounting to €560,000 on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG. The company had contravened obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz - WpHG). At the beginning of 2022, flatexDEGIRO Bank AG advertised free investment services on two of its websites without clearly indicating that a processing fee would be charged on a regular basis. flatexDEGIRO Bank AG adapted its practices to comply with the legal requirements in ...
AI Analysis
BaFin imposed €560,000 in administrative fines on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG on December 16, 2025, for misleading marketing of investment services that advertised free offerings without clearly disclosing mandatory processing fees. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's strict interpretation of fair and transparent marketing requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG) and demonstrates that even corrective action taken by firms does not eliminate regulatory penalties for past violations.
What Changed
The enforcement action clarifies BaFin's expectations regarding fair and clear marketing communications for investment services:
Investment services providers must explicitly and unambiguously disclose all material costs, including processing fees, when advertising services as "free"
Marketing materials must present both benefits and risks of services in a balanced manner, with relevant risks highlighted alongside advantages
These obligations apply across all marketing channels, including compa
What You Need To Do
*For flatexDEGIRO Bank AG (already completed)
Modify marketing materials to clearly and explicitly disclose all material costs and fees
Ensure balanced presentation of benefits and risks across all marketing channels
*For all investment services providers (preventive compliance):
ESMA publishes 2024 data on cross-border investment activity of firms 22 December 2025 Investor protection The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, in cooperation with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), completed an analysis of the cross-border provision of investment services in 2024 . Data was gathered from investment firms across 30 jurisdictions in the EU/EEA. The main findings include: Around 370 financial firms provid...
Long term investment Shares Artificial intelligence Retail investors Journalists AMF 2025 Barometer: in search of autonomy, many French people turn to artificial intelligence when they want to invest
New Q&As available 19 December 2025 Digital Finance and Innovation Fund Management Market Abuse Prospectus Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published or updated the following Questions and Answers: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) Directive Exclusion related to UNGC/OECD Guidelines (2734) Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities Regulation Group-affiliated small ESG ra...
AI Analysis
ESMA published new Q&As on December 19, 2025, addressing practical implementation questions across multiple regulatory frameworks including AIFMD, ESG rating activities, and sustainable finance rules. These guidance documents clarify regulatory expectations and promote consistent supervisory approaches across EU member states, making them essential for firms operating in affected areas to ensure compliant implementation.
What Changed
The December 19, 2025 Q&A publication covers several regulatory domains:
AIFMD Exclusion Criteria: New guidance on the UNGC/OECD Guidelines exclusion (Q&A 2734), clarifying when alternative investment fund managers must apply exclusion-related requirements
ESG Rating Activities: Updated Q&As addressing regulatory requirements for ESG rating providers, including clarification on group-affiliated small ESG rating activities
Sustainable Finance: Continued development of guidance under SFDR and r
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (0-30 days)
*Short-term (1-3 months)
level information
advertised securities per Annex 21 requirements
Key Dates
19 December 2025- ESMA published new Q&As across multiple regulatory domains
30 June 2025- ESMA's final report on prospectus ESG disclosure requirements became effective (referenced in search results as June 6, 2025 publication date)
22 September 2025- ESMA published updated consolidated Q&A on SFDR and Level 2 Regulation with new PAI disclosure guidance
17 October 2025- ESMA updated MiCAR Q&As on execution service classification
2025Q&As. Firms should consult ESMA's official guidance portal for specific transition periods.*
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
ESMA selects EuroCTP to become the first Consolidated Tape Provider for shares and ETFs 19 December 2025 Press Releases Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has selected EuroCTP as the first Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for shares and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the EU, in a step forward for the transparency of equity markets in the EU. Natasha Cazenave, ESMA’s Executive Director, said: “Today’s announcement...
In this, his final blog for 2025, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf reflects on Ireland and the euro area’s economic performance and looks ahead to 2026, drawing on the Quarterly Bulletin and latest eurosystem staff projections published this week.
relating to specialised investment funds, investment companies in risk capital and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/901 consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg specialised investment funds (SIFs), investment companies in risk capital (SICARs), and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010 (Part II UCIs), including their sub-funds. It streamlines investment rules, diversification limits, borrowing, disclosures, and risk management while enhancing flexibility for sophisticated investors and formalizing prior informal guidance, reducing regulatory complexity without compromising investor protection.
#
What Changed
Diversification and investment limits: Introduces tailored percentage-based thresholds; for funds marketed to unsophisticated retail investors, limits remain at 25% per issuer/UCI/asset, raised to 50% per issuer/UCI/asset or 70% per infrastructure investment for well-informed/professional investor funds, with CSSF derogations possible on justification. Limits apply on assets/commitments basis with look-through for intermediary vehicles.
SICAR-specific rules: Confirms risk capital investments (e.
What You Need To Do
Review and update fund documents (e
Assess and document compliance with new/relaxed diversification, borrowing, and SICAR investment rules; apply for CSSF derogations where justified
Ensure risk-spreading in derivatives/collateral and deployment of SICAR cash into eligible assets; confirm look-through for intermediaries
For retail-marketed funds
Maintain robust governance/documentation to leverage flexibility; reference CSSF's Compilation for concepts
Key Dates
late 2025/early 2026 publications, but no explicit dates are provided.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Formalizes prior informal guidance into binding rules with enhanced flexibility but stricter retail protections and disclosure mandates, requiring immediate document reviews/updates for non-compliant SIFs/SICARs/Part II UCIs to avoid supervisory scrutiny or authorization issues; crit
We confirm that the FCA has opened an investigation into WH Smith PLC. The investigation concerns potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules in relation to the matters announced by WH Smith PLC on 19 November 2025.
AI Analysis
The FCA has launched an investigation into WH Smith PLC for potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules, as well as Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs), stemming from announcements made by the company on 19 November 2025. This underscores the FCA's heightened scrutiny of listed companies' disclosure practices and adherence to market conduct standards. Compliance professionals should note this as a signal of enforcement risk in timely and accurate market disclosures, potentially setting precedents for similar cases.
#
What Changed
This is not a policy change or new rule; it is an enforcement investigation announcement with no immediate regulatory amendments. It highlights ongoing enforcement of existing rules:
UK Listing Principles and Rules: These require listed issuers to act with integrity, provide accurate and timely information, and maintain effective systems for compliance (e.g., Principle 2 on communication with investors; Listing Rule 9 on continuing obligations).
Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs): Specific
plan profit warnings or material updates, documenting decision trails
Key Dates
19 November 2025 - WH Smith PLC announcement triggering the investigation(reference point for alleged breaches).
late 2026or 2027. Firms should monitor FCA updates via the specific URL or FCA enforcement news.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This matters due to the FCA's aggressive enforcement posture on market abuse/disclosures (e.g., post-SPPF reforms emphasizing individual accountability). Breaches can lead to multimillion-pound fines (e.g., 10% of annual revenue), director bans, and reputational damage, amplified by p
Revision and remodelling of the rules to which Luxembourg undertakings governed by the Law of 30 March 1988 on undertakings for collective investment (“UCI”) are subject
AI Analysis
Circular IML 91/75, as amended up to CSSF Circular 25/901, consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs, refining rules on diversification, borrowing, risk-spreading, and disclosures while tailoring requirements to investor profiles. It matters because it streamlines fragmented regulations, enhances fund competitiveness, and formalizes CSSF expectations without mandating immediate changes for pre-existing funds, reducing compliance burdens while promoting transparency and flexibility. This update aligns administrative practices with market realities, repealing outdated circulars to eliminate ambiguity.
#
What Changed
Consolidation and Repeals: Repeals CSSF Circulars 02/80, 07/309, 06/241, and Chapters G and I of IML 91/75; renders CSSF 08/356 and Chapter H of IML 91/75 inapplicable to Part II UCIs.
Flexible Diversification Rules: Introduces investor-category-based thresholds (e.g., stricter for retail, looser for sophisticated investors); allows CSSF derogations for SIFs/Part II UCIs with justification; applies look-through for intermediary vehicles; harmonizes ramp-up (up to 12 months for liquid strategies,
What You Need To Do
Review and update offering documents/prospectuses for enhanced transparency on risks, limits, borrowing, liquidity tools (e
Align fund documentation/terminology with CSSF Compilation of key concepts for consistency in filings and communications
Disclose ramp-up/wind-down periods, potential derogations, and life extensions clearly; seek CSSF approval for exemptions where justified
Assess portfolio compliance for new funds/compartments; leverage flexibility for sophisticated investors but maintain robust governance
No immediate changes required for pre-19 Dec 2025 funds, but proactive alignment recommended to avoid future issues
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Not critical as existing funds are grandfathered with no retroactive changes required, but high relevance for new launches or material updates post-19 Dec 2025. It matters for operational efficiency (streamlined rules reduce fragmentation) and investor protection (tailored risks/di
Rules applicable to undertakings for collective investment when they employ certain techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 08/356, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/901, establishes detailed rules for Luxembourg undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), including UCITS and alternative investment funds (AIFs), on the use of techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments, such as securities lending, repo transactions, and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It matters because it ensures investor protection, risk management, and market stability by imposing strict eligibility, collateral, and operational requirements, aligning Luxembourg funds with EU standards under UCITS and AIFMD directives. Compliance is critical for Luxembourg-domiciled funds engaging in these activities to avoid regulatory sanctions and operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The original Circular CSSF 08/356 (2008) transposed UCITS III requirements on eligible techniques like securities lending and repos. The amendment via Circular CSSF 25/901 (issued in 2025) introduces updates to reflect post-Brexit adjustments, enhanced ESG considerations in collateral eligibility, stricter counterparty risk limits for OTC derivatives, and improved transparency in reporting. Key changes include:
Expanded collateral rules: Collateral must now include sustainable assets meeting SFD
What You Need To Do
*Policy Review & Update
*Risk Management Systems
*Counterparty Due Diligence
*Operational Setup
*Reporting & Disclosure
Key Dates
23 December 2008- Original Circular CSSF 08/356 effective date for UCITS III implementation.
21 July 2011- Partial updates for UCITS IV alignment.
22 July 2013- Extension to AIFs under AIFMD transposition.
15 October 2025- Issuance of amending Circular CSSF 25/901.
01 January 2026- Effective date for amendments (e.g., new collateral rules, reporting formats).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate relevance for funds actively using these techniques (common in fixed-income and equity strategies for yield enhancement). Non-compliance risks CSSF fines (up to 5% of NAV), temporary prohibitions on techniques, or fund suspension. With the 01 January 2026 effective date rec
The CFTC approved a final rule on December 18, 2025, that codifies existing staff no-action positions and eliminates duplicative business conduct and documentation requirements for swap dealers and major swap participants. This rule resolves over a decade of regulatory uncertainty, reduces operational costs, and harmonizes CFTC requirements with SEC and Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board standards.
What Changed
The final rule introduces the following substantive amendments:
*Exceptions for Swaps Intended to be Cleared (ITBC Swaps)**
Swap dealers and major swap participants are exempted from certain External Business Conduct Standards and swap trading relationship documentation requirements when executing swaps that are intended by the parties to be cleared contemporaneously with execution. Such swaps are deemed void if rejected from clearing.
*Prime Broker Arrangement Exemptions**
Swaps executed purs
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (Pre-Implementation)
*Implementation Actions (Upon Effective Date)
trade disclosure systems to remove PTMMM generation and delivery requirements
based operations, review implications of superseded Staff Letter No
*Ongoing Compliance
Key Dates
April 4, 2025- CFTC Staff Letter 25-09 issued, establishing no-action position on PTMMM requirement
September 12, 2025- CFTC issued further amended exemptive order permitting JSCC to clear interest rate swaps
September 24, 2025- CFTC issued Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (comment period opened)
October 24, 2025- Comment period deadline (ISDA and SIFMA submitted comments on this date)DEADLINE
December 18, 2025- CFTC approved final rule (subject to pre-publication technical corrections)
Provisional dates for Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) announcements on Bank Rate and publication of MPC meeting minutes and the quarterly Monetary Policy Report.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that financial economist and academic scholar Dr. Joshua T. White will return to the agency beginning the week of Jan. 5, 2026, to serve as its Chief Economist and Director of the Division of…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Investor Advocate today delivered its Report on Activities for the Fiscal Year 2025 to Congress, highlighting the initiatives and work of the office during the fiscal year.The report includes:An…
The FCA welcomes the Government’s consultation on a new benchmarks regime for the UK. Since the introduction of the current regulatory framework, the financial landscape has evolved significantly. We now have an opportunity to build a regime that is more targeted to current market conditions and to reduce unnecessary burdens on industry, without compromising high standards. We are working with the Government to reform the current benchmarks regime to ensure that the regulatory framework remai...
AI Analysis
The FCA welcomes HM Treasury's consultation on reforming the UK Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) to create a narrower, risk-based **Specified Authorised Benchmarks Regime (SABR)**, reducing regulatory scope by 80-90% to target only systemically important benchmarks and administrators while easing burdens on industry. This matters for compliance professionals as it shifts from broad regulation of all benchmarks to targeted oversight, requiring firms to reassess benchmark usage, prepare for transition, and adapt to FCA rules on risk management, enhancing UK competitiveness post-FSMA 2023 repeal of assimilated laws.
#
What Changed
Narrower scope: Regulation limited to benchmarks/administrators designated by HM Treasury (HMT) on FCA advice, based on criteria like systemic impact on UK financial integrity, consumers, or markets; reduces coverage by 80-90%, with no distinction between critical/significant/other types or benchmark categories (e.g., interest rate, commodity).
FCA-led firm-facing rules: HMT delegates requirements (governance, conflicts, oversight, methodology transparency, record-keeping) to FCA Handbook; remov
What You Need To Do
Review current benchmarks for potential designation risk (systemic impact criteria) and map usage across portfolios
Participate in HMT consultation (responses via gov
Develop/revise policies for benchmark risk management, including cessation/wind-down plans for regulated/non-regulated benchmarks per future FCA guidance
Assess transition from current authorisation (if non-designated, prepare for deregistration); overseas firms evaluate ORR eligibility
Update governance/conflicts frameworks for any designated activities; monitor ESG data inclusion in rules
Key Dates
17 December 2025- HM Treasury publishes consultation on benchmarks regime reform.
1 January 2026- Reforms take initial effect; UK becomes only jurisdiction regulating all local benchmarks pre-reform; EU BMR reforms effective, highlighting UK divergence.
Due course 2026- FCA consults on regulatory requirements for designated administrators/users.
2026- FCA expected to publish updated guidance on critical benchmarks and implement SABR refinements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Significant scope reduction eases burdens but introduces transition risks, new FCA rules, and designation uncertainty; firms must act now on consultation (post-Dec 2025) and prep for 2026 FCA changes to avoid non-compliance during shift, especially with 1 Jan 2026 milestone amplifyin
ESMA reviews impact of Guidelines on ESG or sustainability related terms in fund names 17 December 2025 Risk monitoring Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial market regulator and supervisor, released research today assessing the impact of its fund naming guidelines on ESG and sustainability-related terms. The study found that ESMA’s Guidelines have: Improved consistency in the use of ESG terms by increasing alignment of fund names and the...
amending Circular CSSF 22/811.Authorisation and organisation of entities acting as UCI administrators.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/900, issued on 16 December 2025, amends Circular CSSF 22/811 to clarify governance principles, authorisation requirements, and operational standards for UCI (Undertakings for Collective Investment) administrators in Luxembourg, while reforming annual reporting obligations. It matters because it strengthens supervisory oversight, aligns with DORA for ICT outsourcing, and simplifies reporting to enhance efficiency and compliance in the fund administration sector.
#
What Changed
Repeals Annex B of Circular CSSF 22/811 with immediate effect, replacing it with streamlined annual reporting via a core compliance-focused Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) that assesses governance, internal controls, operational organization, and risk management; detailed instructions are now on the CSSF website.
Introduces prior CSSF authorisation requirements for entities acting as UCI administrators, including a defined administrative procedure with application details in Annex A; authori
What You Need To Do
Assess eligibility and obtain prior CSSF authorisation via Annex A application (or notify substantial changes); ensure ongoing validity by monitoring operational model and delegations
Adapt internal processes for revised annual UCIA reporting (SAQ-focused, integrated where applicable); submit using CSSF website instructions starting for FY ending 31 Dec 2025
Review/update contracts with UCIs/IFMs to define roles, responsibilities, and oversight; implement delegation monitoring, remediation plans, and ICT compliance (DORA/Circular 25/882 or 20/750)
For DORA-scope entities, align outsourcing arrangements with Circular CSSF 25/882
Key Dates
16 December 2025- Issuance date; repeal of Annex B of Circular CSSF 22/811 effective immediately.
January 2025- DORA entry into force, applying to ICT outsourcing for in-scope UCIAs.
31 December 2025- New reporting framework (SAQ and updated modalities) applies to all financial years ending on or after this date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate repeal of prior reporting Annex requires prompt process updates; new framework applies to FY 2025 year-ends (just past as of Jan 2026), risking supervisory scrutiny or penalties for non-compliance; DORA alignment adds operational resilience pressure amid ongoing CSSF focus
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its former director a total of €500,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Novaxia Investissement €400,000 and its former director Joachim Azan €100,000 on 10 December 2025 for breaches of professional obligations, primarily due to an incomplete and non-operational investment/divestment procedure lacking traceability of compliance checks and formalized due diligence. This enforcement action underscores AMF's focus on robust operational procedures in asset management, serving as a deterrent and educational tool for ensuring honest, fair, and diligent business conduct. Compliance teams should prioritize procedure operationalization to avoid similar sanctions, as this fits a pattern of recent AMF fines targeting procedural deficiencies.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing requirements under AMF professional obligations for asset managers (sociétés de gestion), including:
Fully operational investment and divestment procedures that ensure traceability of compliance checks against fund policies and constraints.
Formalized due diligence prior to allocating investment projects to funds.
No explicit changes to rules; instead, it clarifies enforcement expectations for procedure completenes
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance investment/divestment procedures: Ensure completeness, traceability of all compliance checks (e
Document all processes rigorously
Conduct gap analysis against AMF expectations
Senior manager training
Appeal monitoring
Key Dates
10 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines; appeals possible (no specific deadline stated, but typically within 2 months to Conseil d’État).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This decision, part of a 2025 enforcement wave fining asset managers €400k–€1.3m for procedural lapses (e.g., non-operational investment processes, inadequate due diligence), signals intensified AMF scrutiny on operational integrity. Firms risk personal fines for managers and reputat
Der Bundesrat hat am 12. Dezember 2025 beschlossen, die Iran-Sanktionen dem Stand von vor dem Abschluss des Wiener Abkommens über das iranische Atomprogramm anzupassen. Dazu hat er die Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran einer Totalrevision unterzogen. Die neue Verordnung (SR 946.231.143.6) trat am 12. Dezember 2025 in Kraft.
AI Analysis
Switzerland has completely revised its Iran sanctions regulations effective December 12, 2025, restoring sanctions to pre-2015 levels following the automatic reinstatement of UN Security Council resolutions on September 28, 2025. This comprehensive overhaul requires Swiss financial institutions and businesses to immediately implement expanded asset freezes, trade restrictions, and sectoral prohibitions affecting Iran-related transactions and designated persons.
What Changed
The total revision introduces several critical regulatory shifts:
*Scope Expansion**: The revised ordinance restores seven previously suspended UN Security Council resolutions (1696, 1737, 1747, 1803, 1835, 1929, and 2224) and aligns Swiss sanctions with EU measures reactivated on September 29, 2025.
*Sectoral Restrictions**: New measures in the raw materials sector have been introduced, complementing existing prohibitions on:
Sale or supply of key energy sector equipment
Gold, precious metals
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Completed by December 12, 2025)
related transactions and accounts for compliance with expanded prohibitions
*Short-term (By January 1, 2026)
September 30, 2025 contracts under legacy exemption provisions
related transactions
Key Dates
September 28, 2025- UN Security Council resolutions automatically reinstated (snapback mechanism triggered)
September 29, 2025- EU reactivated suspended sanctions on Iran's proliferation activities
October 20, 2025- Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated SESAM sanctions database with reinstated listings
October 21, 2025- Updated sanctions list effective (23:00 UTC)
December 12, 2025- Complete revision of Iran sanctions ordinance (SR 946.231.143.6) entered into force (23:00 UTC)
Governance Annual report Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF examines the transparency of executive succession plans as part of its 2025 Corporate Governance Report
Der Bundesrat hat die Sanktionslisten betreffend Russland und Belarus am 12. Dezember 2025 ausgeweitet. Die Schweiz übernimmt damit diverse Änderungen, welche die EU im Rahmen ihres 19. Sanktionspakets beschlossen hat.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Council expanded sanctions lists against Russia and Belarus on December 12, 2025, adopting changes from the EU's 19th sanctions package to align Swiss measures with EU restrictions. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate asset freezes, transaction bans, and reporting obligations on newly listed entities, strengthening efforts to counter Russia's military-industrial complex and shadow oil fleet while preventing sanctions evasion.
#
What Changed
Asset freezes and prohibitions: 22 natural persons and 42 companies/organizations added to asset freeze and prohibition on making funds/assets available lists.
Shipping restrictions: 116 new vessels (primarily Russian shadow fleet tankers evading oil price caps) subjected to comprehensive purchase, sale, and service bans.
Export controls: 45 new companies (including in third countries) under stricter export controls to block deliveries of critical goods to Russia's military-industrial sector.
Fi
What You Need To Do
Immediate screening
Asset freezing
Transaction halts
Ongoing monitoring
Key Dates
13 December 2025- Measures enter into force; immediate implementation required.DEADLINE
29 October 2025- Prior expansion decision (related 18th EU package adoption).
30 October 2025- Entry into force of October measures (export restrictions, RDIF transaction bans).
31 December 2025- Extension of certain derogations (e.g., Russia investment withdrawals).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical - Effective immediately (13 Dec 2025), with no grace period for asset freezes/transaction bans, exposing non-compliant firms to severe penalties amid FINMA's active enforcement on sanctions (type: enforcement). This escalates existing Russia/Belarus regimes, targeting evasion vecto
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
This Statistical Notice 2025/06 announces the release of Bank of England Statistics Taxonomy version 1.3.1, which updates definitions and guidance in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder, including upgrades from XBRL 2.3.0 to 3.0, validation fixes, and data point model changes. It matters for compliance teams at reporting firms as it ensures accurate submission of statistical data to the BoE, supporting monetary policy, financial stability monitoring, and national accounts under the Bank of England Act 1998.
#
What Changed
Upgrade of the reporting taxonomy from XBRL 2.3.0 to XBRL 3.0, introducing technical enhancements for improved data structure and interoperability.
Validation fixes to address errors in data submission processes.
Changes to the data point model (DPM), refining how specific data elements are defined and reported.
These updates align with ongoing refinements to the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder, which contains core definitions for BoE statistical returns.
#
What You Need To Do
Review and update reporting systems to support XBRL 3
Participate in the two proposed UAT windows to test submissions under the new taxonomy
Subscribe to or amend BoE Statistical Notices circulation list to receive updates
Cross-reference against the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder for any definitional impacts on ongoing returns
Key Dates
Provisional UAT windows (two proposed)- User Acceptance Testing periods for validating the new taxonomy 1.3.1; exact dates to be confirmed via BoE updates.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a technical taxonomy update rather than a substantive regulatory shift, but non-compliance risks invalid submissions, data rejection, or delays in BoE reporting, which could affect supervisory assessments and national statistics. Firms with automated reporting pipelines fac
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 7. August 1990 über Wirtschaftsmassnahmen gegenüber der Republik Irak (SR 946.206) publiziert.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces a SECO update to the annex of the Ordinance on Economic Measures against the Republic of Iraq (SR 946.206), reflecting UN Sanctions Committee amendments to the list of sanctioned individuals, companies, and organizations made on December 9, 2025. It matters because these changes are directly applicable in Switzerland, requiring financial intermediaries to immediately block affected assets and report business relationships to SECO to ensure compliance with UN sanctions. Failure to act risks enforcement by FINMA under its supervisory mandate.
#
What Changed
The UN Sanctions Committee modified the sanctions list targeting persons, companies, and organizations related to Iraq on December 9, 2025; this amendment was published by SECO on its website and integrated into the SESAM sanctions database on December 10, 2025.
Switzerland automatically applies UN sanctions lists without delay per the Federal Council's Ordinance of March 4, 2016, making the update immediately binding.
Financial intermediaries must implement prohibitions, freeze assets of newly
What You Need To Do
Screen against SESAM database
Asset freeze
Report to SECO
Internal review
Document compliance
Key Dates
December 9, 2025- UN Sanctions Committee decision amending the Iraq sanctions list.
December 10, 2025- SECO publishes update on its website and updates SESAM database; changes enter into force immediately in Switzerland.
Immediate (as of December 10, 2025)- Financial intermediaries must block assets and report to SECO without delay, per automatic application of UN sanctions.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Automatic and immediate effect heightens breach risk, with FINMA enforcement powers including fines, reputational damage, or license revocation for non-compliance. It matters due to Switzerland's direct implementation of UN sanctions, amplifying AML/financial crime exposure amid ongo
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the agenda and panelists for its Dec. 16, 2025, roundtable on Rule 611 of Regulation NMS and other associated rules and regulatory requirements.The roundtable will be held at the University of Austin…
New report outlines the Central Bank’s approach to more effective and efficient regulatory and supervisory framework, reducing complexity and improving clarity while maintaining resilience and important protections in the system. This work builds on the Central Bank’s strategy to transform regulation and supervision, including the introduction of our new integrated supervisory approach and the improvements made in our gatekeeping processes in recent years. The roadmap sets out a comprehensive...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland published a comprehensive multi-year roadmap on December 10, 2025, aimed at streamlining its regulatory and supervisory framework across four pillars: supervision, regulation, gatekeeping, and reporting. This initiative represents a strategic shift toward more effective and efficient oversight while explicitly maintaining resilience standards and consumer protections, responding to EU calls for regulatory reform to enhance competitiveness.
What Changed
The roadmap encompasses four major reform areas:
*Supervision: Implementation of a new integrated, risk-based supervisory approach** introduced in January 2025, consolidating multidisciplinary teams and sharpening risk focus with clearer supervisory communications. This delivers more coherent firm engagement, stronger proportionality, and streamlined processes.
*Regulation: Comprehensive updates to the domestic rulebook, including:
Insurance: Major compatibility review to eliminate duplication
What You Need To Do
*Immediate actions for compliance professionals
*Monitor consultation releases
*Assess rulebook changes
*Evaluate supervisory engagement
*Prepare for gatekeeping changes
Key Dates
January 2025- New integrated supervisory model became effective
2026- Public consultation on new Regulatory Impact Assessment Framework
2026 to first half of 2028- Multi-year programme implementation period for all roadmap initiatives
2025- Strategic review of Industry Funding Levy approach (consultation expected during 2025)
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat den Anhang 2 der Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2005 über Massnahmen gegenüber Sudan (SR 946.231.18) geändert.
AI Analysis
On December 9, 2025, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated Annex 2 of the Sudan Sanctions Ordinance (SR 946.231.18), requiring Swiss financial intermediaries to implement changes to their sanctions screening and compliance procedures. This update reflects ongoing international coordination on Sudan sanctions enforcement and requires immediate implementation by all Swiss-regulated financial institutions.
What Changed
The regulatory update modified Annex 2 of the Sudan Sanctions Ordinance effective December 9, 2025 at 23:00 UTC. While the search results do not provide the specific entities added or removed from the sanctions list, the update was coordinated through FINMA's SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database, which serves as Switzerland's authoritative sanctions database for financial intermediaries.
The timing of this update aligns with broader international sanctions activity on Sudan. In July 2025,
What You Need To Do
*Sanctions List Update
*System Screening
*Transaction Review
*Blocked Assets
*Staff Training
Key Dates
December 9, 2025, 23:00 UTC- Effective date of the urgent amendment to Annex 2 of SR 946.231.18; SECO updated the SESAM database on this date
Immediate- Financial intermediaries required to implement changes according to SR 946.231.18 regulationsDEADLINE
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
PS27/25 finalizes the PRA's policy to delete 37 redundant banking regulatory reporting templates (34 FINREP, 2 COREP, and PRA109) as the first phase of the Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, aiming to reduce reporting burdens while maintaining supervisory data quality. This matters for PRA-regulated banks as it delivers immediate cost savings and signals broader regulatory simplification, aligning with the PRA's secondary competitiveness and growth objective.
#
What Changed
Deletion of 37 whole reporting templates identified as duplicative, outdated, or low-value: 34 FINREP templates, 2 COREP templates (C05.01 and C05.02, now obsolete), and PRA109.
Consolidation of remaining FINREP scoping provisions into a single section of the PRA Rulebook (new Chapters 5A–5F of the Reporting (CRR) Part), with clarifications to unclear or duplicative conditions.
Alignment of FINREP remittance deadlines to 30 business days for reports under Article 430(3), Article 11(2), and new C
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal reporting systems, processes, and controls to cease submission of the 37 deleted templates for reference dates from 31 December 2025 onwards
Confirm applicability of consolidated FINREP scoping rules (Chapters 5A–5F) and adjust scoping for remaining templates, incorporating clarified conditions
Assess eligibility for individual FINREP waivers under the updated framework if part of a UK consolidation group; apply to PRA if criteria met (90-95% asset contribution)
Update compliance policies and training to reflect SS34/15 amendments and aligned remittance deadlines
Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations for any ongoing requirements tied to deleted templates and prepare for potential future changes
Key Dates
8 December 2025- Publication of PS27/25, finalizing policy and responses to CP21/25 consultation.
31 December 2025- Effective date for revised rules, amended SS34/15, and deletions; applies to reporting reference dates falling on or after this date (avoids 2025 Q4 submissions where relevant).
11 November 2025- Q3 2025 remittance deadline (precedes PS publication, so no concession for early non-reporting).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Changes are simplificatory (deletions reduce burden), with immediate effect from 31 December 2025, but no new requirements or penalties for non-compliance with deleted items; firms must act promptly to decommission processes and avoid erroneous submissions. This matters as it lower
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Lori J. Schock, who has served as the Director of the Office of Investor Education and Assistance (OIEA) since 2009, will retire from the agency at the end of December.“I have known Lori for…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold the second in its series of compliance outreach events regarding the 2024 adoption of amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, for transfer agents, is a webinar scheduled for December 17…
The Central Bank of Ireland has today (5 December) launched a public consultation on the implementation of our new Access to Cash responsibilities. Deputy Governor Vasileios Madouros said: “Amid a rapidly evolving payments landscape, the Central Bank of Ireland is committed to making sure that cash continues to be readily available as a means of payment. Today’s consultation is an important step towards the implementation of the Central Bank’s new responsibilities under the Access to Cash leg...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland has launched a public consultation on implementing new **Access to Cash** responsibilities under the Finance (Provision of Access to Cash Infrastructure) Act 2025, which commenced on 30 June 2025. This consultation addresses two critical areas: identifying local deficiencies in cash infrastructure and establishing minimum ATM service standards. The initiative reflects regulatory commitment to ensuring cash remains readily available as payment preferences shift toward digital channels.
What Changed
The consultation covers two primary regulatory components:
*1. Local Deficiency Guidelines**
The Central Bank will establish procedures for identifying geographical areas where individuals and SMEs face particular difficulties accessing cash, even where overall access-to-cash criteria are met. The guidelines will specify how the Central Bank receives notifications, undertakes assessments, and makes determinations regarding local deficiencies.
*2. ATM Service Standards and Operator Requirements
What You Need To Do
*For designated credit institutions
Monitor consultation developments and prepare for compliance with minimum cash infrastructure maintenance levels once regulations are finalized
Prepare to provide quarterly data on ATM numbers, locations, and availability hours
*For ATM operators
Engage with the consultation process to provide feedback on proposed service standards
Key Dates
5 December 2025 – 4 March 2026– Public consultation period for local deficiency guidelines and ATM service standards
30 June 2025– Finance (Provision of Access to Cash Infrastructure) Act 2025 commenced
Early 2026– First publication of quarterly cash infrastructure data expected
30 June 2026– Central Bank to publish local deficiency guidelines
2026– Central Bank to publish final ATM service standards regulations
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Journalists Listed companies and issuers The Autorité des Marchés Financiers takes note of the Cour de Cassation ruling in the Vivendi SE case
CP22/25 is a consultation paper on post-implementation amendments to UK Solvency II reporting and disclosure requirements, published by the PRA on 4 December 2025. The consultation addresses feedback and queries from insurance firms following the substantial reduction in reporting templates implemented at the end of 2024, clarifying expectations for compliance with the revised Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook across multiple technical areas including accident/underwriting year reporting, annuity reporting by currency, and internal model governance disclosures.
What Changed
The consultation introduces clarifications and amendments to Solvency II reporting requirements in several critical areas:
*Reporting Framework Modifications
Accident or underwriting year reporting: The PRA sets expectations for how firms should apply options within the Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook regarding temporal classification of claims.
Annuity reporting by currency: Specific guidance on reporting annuities stemming from non-life obligations disaggregated by currency.
RBNS claims de
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (January-February 2026)
*Review consultation paper
*Assess applicability
*Identify gaps
*Engage supervisory contacts
Key Dates
4 December 2025- PRA published CP22/25 consultation paper
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of new annual quantitative reporting template requirements (AoC.01) for firms with financial year-end on or after this date
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of quarterly QMC.01 reporting for internal model firms with financial year-end on or after this date
55 business days after quarter-end- Deadline for quarterly QMC.01 submission (internal model firms)DEADLINE
100 business days after financial year-end- Deadline for annual AoC.01 submission (internal model firms and groups)DEADLINE
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
The Bank of England's Statistical Notice 2025/05 requires all reporting institutions to confirm their confidentiality permissions for publishing aggregate statistical data during the 2026 reporting year. This mandatory review streamlines data publication processes by seeking prior consent for aggregate data where firms are among fewer than three contributors, reducing administrative burden while maintaining data integrity.
What Changed
The notice introduces a streamlined confidentiality permission framework with four consent options for reporting institutions:
1. Blanket consent – Give prior approval for all statistical forms
2. Form-by-form consent – Approve permissions on individual forms
3. Selective consent – Approve all forms except specified data points
4. Case-by-case opt-out – Require explicit consent for each publication instance
The material change is the Bank's shift toward pre-approval for aggregate data publicat
What You Need To Do
*Log into the BEEDS portal and access the confidentiality permission survey
*Select one of four consent options (blanket, form-by-form, selective, or case-by-case)
*For multi-entity groups
*Review prepopulated firm information and make adjustments as needed
*Submit final preferences via the portal (latest submission version is treated as final)
Key Dates
19 December 2025, 5:00 PM GMT– Deadline for completing confidentiality preference survey in BEEDS portalDEADLINE
January–December 2026– Reporting reference periods covered by granted permissions
Ongoing– Consent remains valid for these periods unless explicitly withdrawn; applies to resubmissions and late submissions for 2026 reference periods
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
#
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-cent
What You Need To Do
Assess cross-border transactions
Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025HMT deems approval of PRA’s instrument.
24 September 2025HMT deems approval of FCA’s instrument.
27 November 2025Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary eq
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cristina Martin Firvida, who has served as the Director of the Office of the Investor Advocate since January 2023, will conclude her tenure with the agency at the end of January 2026. As…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Investor Advisory Committee will hold a virtual public meeting on Dec. 4, 2025, at 10 a.m. ET. The meeting will be webcast on the SEC website.The committee will host two panels:Regulatory Changes in Corporate…
The CFTC filed a civil enforcement action on November 21, 2025, against Brian Mitchell, Kevin Mack Jr., and their unregistered entity Young Pros Investment Group LLC (YPIG) for fraudulently soliciting ~$1 million from 33 pool participants to trade commodity futures, using misrepresentations, Ponzi payments, false statements, and registration violations, including Mitchell's breach of a prior 2021 CFTC order. This case underscores the CFTC's aggressive enforcement against unregistered commodity pools and fraud, seeking restitution, disgorgement, penalties, trading bans, and injunctions under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Compliance teams must prioritize registration checks and fraud prevention to avoid similar actions, as it highlights personal liability for controlling persons.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reinforces longstanding CEA and CFTC rules on:
Mandatory registration as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and Associated Persons (APs) for pools trading commodity futures (CFTC Regulation 4.13 exemptions do not apply here due to fraud and public solicitation).
Prohibitions on fraud, misrepresentations, guarantees of profit, non-disclosure of risks, commingling funds, and operating pools as
What You Need To Do
Verify registration
Implement controls
Conduct due diligence
Train staff
For SEC-registered advisers
Key Dates
2025.
November 21, 2025- CFTC files complaint in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
~December 2020 - May 2022- Alleged fraudulent solicitation and trading period.
2021- Prior CFTC administrative order against Mitchell (Press Release 8427-21) prohibiting trading and registration activities for three years.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This action signals intensified CFTC scrutiny on unregistered pools amid rising crypto/futures fraud (e.g., similar January 2026 case against Wolf Capital). It matters because penalties include personal bans, multimillion restitution/disgorgement, and whistleblower awards (10-30% of
This joint PRA-FCA consultation (CP23/25 from PRA and Chapter 4 of FCA's CP25/33) proposes policy updates to regulatory fees, levies, and invoice processes for 2026/27, including new fee blocks for emerging activities like PISCES operators and targeted support, alongside adjustments to FOS/FSCS levies and payment timelines. It matters for compliance teams as it directly impacts budgeting, fee calculations, and cash flow management for fee-payers, with potential cost increases and procedural changes effective from April 2026.
#
What Changed
New fee structures: Introduction of a periodic fee block for PISCES operators based on regulated income (baseline £2,200 annual fee, variable above £500,000 threshold); extension of fee-block A.13 to include "targeted support" activities (Category 2 variation fee for existing firms, Category 4 for new entrants); registration fees for Deferred Payment Credit (DPC/buy-now-pay-later) activities aligned with Temporary Permissions Regime, added to FOS consumer credit fee-block but excluded from FSCS.
What You Need To Do
Review current fee/levy exposure and model impacts of new blocks (e
Assess invoice processes if paying £50,000+ in FCA/PRA fees; prepare for aligned due dates
Submit consultation responses by deadlines, focusing on targeted support by 9 January 2026
Budget for potential fee increases; monitor Spring 2026 fee-rates CP
For applicants
Key Dates
9 January 2026- Deadline for comments on targeted support proposals (FCA CP25/33 paras 2.11-2.18, questions 3-7).DEADLINE
16 January 2026- Consultation close for all other proposals, including PRA-FCA joint changes; responses to cp25-33@fca.org.uk.
February 2026- FCA publishes feedback and rules on targeted support in Handbook Notice.
March 2026- FCA publishes feedback and rules on all other proposals (including Chapter 4) in Handbook Notice; Spring fee-rates consultation.
April 2026- PRA publishes feedback and rules on Chapter 4; changes effective for 2026/27 fee year (April-March).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act imminently on consultation responses (deadlines passed as of today, but feedback analysis pending March/April 2026 rules) to influence outcomes; changes affect 2026/27 budgets starting April, with cash flow risks from invoice timing and new fees for emerging activities
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced today that it will hold a roundtable on Dec. 16, 2025, to discuss Rule 611 of Regulation NMS and other, associated rules and regulatory requirements. This roundtable is a follow-up to the SEC’s Sept. 18,…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations today released its 2026 examination priorities. The Division publishes its annual examination priorities to provide transparency to registrants and investors about the topics that the…
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bank’s administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Update of Circular CSSF 22/821 on the Long Form Report, as amended by Circulars CSSF 23/845 and CSSF 24/865
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/897 updates Circular CSSF 22/821 on the Long Form Report (LFR) for credit institutions, further aligning the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) with current supervisory priorities such as ML/FT risks and organizational aspects. This matters because it refines reporting to reduce redundancies, enhance transparency in REA assessments, and reflect evolving prudential focuses since prior amendments via Circulars CSSF 23/845 and 24/865, ensuring institutions' reports better support CSSF oversight.
#
What Changed
Introduces new modules in the revised SAQ to align with supervisory points of focus, building on prior expansions (e.g., credit/counterparty risk, liquidity risk, climate-related risks from CSSF 23/845).
Emphasizes REA's independent assessment in the AML/CFT report, requiring exhaustive, transparent evaluations of ML/FT risks across institutions, branches, majority-owned subsidiaries abroad, and tied agents; prohibits vague language (e.g., no "no serious weaknesses" phrasing) and mandates positi
What You Need To Do
Complete and submit revised SAQ annually, incorporating new modules on supervisory focuses like ML/FT risks and providing detailed data to REA
Authorized management
Ensure AML/CFT report details methodologies (e
Review prior LFR submissions against this update to align with suppressed redundancies and new emphases
Key Dates
31 October 2025- Issuance date of Circular CSSF 25/897.
Three months after financial year-end- Annual submission deadline for SAQ to CSSF (unchanged from prior circulars).DEADLINE
Five months after financial year-end- Submission deadline for REA Reports (Financial Instruments and Funds Report; AML/CFT Report).DEADLINE
Six months after financial year-end- Aligned submission for REA management letter (per amendments in CSSF 23/845 to Circular 22/826).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Institutions face immediate refinement needs for 2025 year-end reporting (e.g., SAQ due ~Q1 2026), with stricter REA scrutiny on AML/CFT transparency risking supervisory findings or enforcement if vague assessments persist; aligns with ongoing CSSF push for risk-focused oversight ami
Long Form ReportPractical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by institutionsMission and related reports of the statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés)
AI Analysis
**Circular CSSF 22/821** (as amended) fundamentally restructures how Luxembourg credit institutions report to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) by replacing the traditional Long Form Report with a digital **self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ)**, complemented by auditor-prepared reports. This shift represents a significant operational change that requires institutions to directly participate in prudential self-assessment while maintaining robust external audit oversight, making it essential for compliance and operational teams to understand new submission requirements and digital workflows.
What Changed
The circular introduces a three-component reporting framework that fundamentally alters the compliance landscape:
Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ): A digital, annually-completed questionnaire that institutions must prepare directly, covering domains within CSSF and ECB prudential supervision competence
Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) Reports: Reports prepared by approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d'entreprises agréés) on specific compliance areas
Separate REA Report on Financial Instruments
What You Need To Do
*For Credit Institutions
*Establish SAQ Governance
*Data Preparation
*Digital System Access
*Module Completion
Key Dates
25 October 2022- Circular CSSF 22/821 issued
31 December 2022- Circular enters into application
Three months before financial year closure- SAQ becomes accessible through CSSF digital solution
Three months after financial year closure- Deadline for SAQ submission to CSSFDEADLINE
Five months after financial year closure- Deadline for REA reports submissionDEADLINE
Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 07/325, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765, CSSF 22/827, and most recently CSSF 25/898, establishes supervisory requirements for EU credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg via branches or free provision of services (FOPS). It matters for compliance professionals as it defines CSSF's host authority role, notification obligations, reporting, and enforcement powers, ensuring alignment with CRD and MiFID II while adapting to evolving EU rules.
#
What Changed
CSSF 21/765: Updated provisions following amendments to CSSF Regulation No 12-02, refining notification and operational requirements for branches and FOPS.
CSSF 22/827: Further amendments to align with CRD and MiFID II changes, including enhanced notifications for programme alterations (e.g., one-month prior written notice for changes in operations, services, or activities).
CSSF 25/898: Latest update (noted in CSSF Newsletter No 298, November 2025), incorporating recent legal/regulatory develop
What You Need To Do
Notifications
Supervision cooperation
Key Dates
One month before change effective date- Notify CSSF and home authority in writing of programme changes (e.g., operations, services, additional places of business) per CRD Article 36(3) and MiFID II Article 35(10).
Within 3 months of receipt- Home state authority communicates notification file to CSSF for branch/FOPS establishment.
Six months after financial year-end- Submit electronically signed SAQ (via eDesk), annual AML/CFT and conduct of business report (per Circular CSSF 19/731, to be repealed by CSSF 25/902), reviewed by REA.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to recurring annual reporting (e.g., SAQ, AML/CFT within six months post-year-end) and prior notifications for changes, with CSSF enforcement powers (e.g., measures under LFS Article 46(2)) for non-compliance. Recent CSSF 25/898 update (Nov 2025) requires immediate revi
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order granting temporary exemptive relief from certain compliance dates adopted under Regulation NMS: Minimum Pricing Increments, Access Fees and Transparency of Better Priced Orders as follows:…
Update of Circular CSSF 07/325 on Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765 and CSSF 22/827
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/898 updates Luxembourg's supervisory framework for EU-origin credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg through branches or free provision of services. This amendment enhances the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) used by the CSSF to align supervisory oversight with current regulatory priorities, particularly adding UCI administration as a new thematic module. The update reflects the CSSF's evolving supervisory focus and requires affected institutions to demonstrate compliance with expanded assessment criteria.
What Changed
The circular introduces the following material modifications to Circular CSSF 07/325:
*New Supervisory Module
UCI administration** has been added as a thematic module to the self-assessment questionnaire, reflecting increased regulatory attention to fund administration practices.
*Enhanced Self-Assessment Framework**
Existing modules have been updated to better align with supervisory objectives and current regulatory priorities.
The revised SAQ now captures a broader range of supervisory point
What You Need To Do
*Update Self-Assessment Processes
Revise internal SAQ completion procedures to address the new UCI administration module
Ensure all thematic modules reflect current supervisory expectations
*Assess UCI Administration Compliance
If the institution provides or is involved in UCI administration services, conduct a detailed assessment of compliance with CSSF expectations
Key Dates
31 October 2025- Circular CSSF 25/898 published by the CSSF
19 December 2025- Related modernization framework (Circular CSSF 25/901) entered into force for Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs
No specific implementation deadline stated- Institutions should align their SAQ responses and compliance documentation with the updated framework immediately upon publicationDEADLINE
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und Energiebereich. Der Bundesrat hat dafür die Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) geändert.
AI Analysis
Switzerland has aligned with additional EU measures from the 18th sanctions package against Russia and specific Belarus measures, amending the Ordinance on Measures against Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) to focus on goods, financial, and energy sectors. This strengthens the sanctions regime against Belarus to mirror Russia's more closely, aiming to enhance effectiveness and prevent circumvention. Compliance teams must prioritize asset freezes, transaction prohibitions, and reporting to avoid enforcement risks from FINMA and SECO.
#
What Changed
Alignment with EU's 18th sanctions package (adopted 18 July 2025) and additional Belarus-specific measures, targeting Belarus's involvement in Russia's war against Ukraine.
Amendments to SR 946.231.116.9, harmonizing Belarus sanctions with Russia's regime, particularly in goods (e.g., export restrictions on chemicals, metals, plastics for military/tech strengthening), financial services (e.g., transaction bans on additional banks), and energy sectors.
Requirements for financial intermediaries to
What You Need To Do
Immediately screen client portfolios, transactions, and assets against updated SECO sanctions lists for Belarus (and cross-reference Russia lists)
Freeze assets of newly sanctioned persons/entities and prohibit dealings (e
Report all affected business relationships to SECO promptly; conduct parallel GwG AML checks and file SARs if suspicions persist
Update compliance systems, transaction monitoring rules, and staff training for goods/financial/energy sanctions; cease any prohibited services (e
Review third-party exposures (e
Key Dates
18 July 2025- EU adopts 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional Belarus measures.
29 October 2025- Swiss Federal Council decides to align and amends SR 946.231.116.9.
30 October 2025- New provisions enter into force.
13 December 2025- Related expansion of Russia/Belarus lists (22 persons, 42 entities, 116 ships, 45 trade firms) takes effect, relevant for harmonization context.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Effective 30 October 2025, these changes demand immediate portfolio screening and reporting, with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement, asset seizure, or criminal penalties under sanctions laws. Matters due to rapid alignment with evolving EU packages, increasing circumvention ri
Die Schweiz schliesst sich den weiteren Massnahmen des 18. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland sowie den zusätzlich zum 18. Sanktionspaket erlassenen Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus an. Dies hat der Bundesrat am 29. Oktober 2025 beschlossen. Im Fokus stehen Massnahmen im Güter-, Finanz und Energiebereich. Der Bundesrat hat dafür die Verordnung über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) geändert.
AI Analysis
On October 29, 2025, the Swiss Federal Council (Bundesrat) adopted comprehensive sanctions measures aligned with the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia and additional measures against Belarus, effective October 30, 2025. This enforcement action significantly expands financial transaction prohibitions, export restrictions, and asset freezes, requiring Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately implement new compliance obligations across banking, goods trade, and energy sectors.
What Changed
*Financial Sector Restrictions**
The Bundesrat expanded transaction prohibitions on Russian banks substantially:
Extended existing transaction bans from 23 Russian banks to cover all specialized payment messaging services, converting these to complete transaction prohibitions
Introduced new transaction prohibitions for 22 additional Russian banks
Prohibited all transactions with the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), its sub-funds, and affiliated enterprises, tightening restrictions previou
What You Need To Do
*Implement transaction prohibitions on all 45+ Russian banks now subject to complete bans (previously 23 with partial restrictions)
*Freeze assets of all sanctioned persons and entities immediately upon notice
*Report affected business relationships to SECO—this reporting obligation does not relieve firms from conducting additional due diligence when suspicious indicators exist
*Screen counterparties against updated sanctions lists, particularly the RDIF and its sub-funds
*Cease all transactions with newly prohibited entities, including payment system operators and financial institutions in third countries (Belarus, Kazakhstan) supporting Russian war economy
Key Dates
October 29, 2025- Federal Council decision adopted
October 30, 2025- Measures effective date
Ongoing- Financial intermediaries must implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs)DEADLINE
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
What Changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
*Securitisation Requirements**
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expect
What You Need To Do
*Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
*Assess securitisation impacts
*Evaluate mortgage capital treatment
*Update ECAI mapping processes
*Establish implementation timeline
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026- PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026- Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027- Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
What Changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
*ICAAP Requirements**
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligation risk, and foreign currency lending to unhedged retail and SME borrowers
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of c
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Actions
*Establish ICAAP Framework
*Risk Identification and Assessment
*Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
Key Dates
29 July 2015- SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026- Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing- Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rulesDEADLINE
**PS20/25** represents the second and final phase of the PRA's "Strong and Simple Framework," establishing a significantly simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) while maintaining their resilience. This near-final policy statement, published on 28 October 2025, fundamentally restructures capital requirements, liquidity rules, and operational frameworks for SDDTs—a critical development for smaller deposit-taking institutions seeking regulatory relief from disproportionate compliance burdens.
What Changed
The simplified capital regime introduces structural changes across all three pillars of capital requirements:
*Pillar 1 (Risk-Weighted Assets)
SDDTs must apply Basel 3.1 standardised approaches for credit risk and operational risk, with specific simplifications.
Due diligence requirements in the standardised approach to credit risk are disapplied for SDDTs.
Counterparty credit risk (CCR) for derivatives and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk are disapplied (with minor exceptions).
Market ri
What You Need To Do
*For SDDTs Currently Operating or Considering Entry:
*Notification Decision – Determine whether to enter the SDDT regime and submit notification to the PRA by 31 March 2026 if seeking to benefit from simplified rules
*Policy Review – Conduct comprehensive review of PS20/25, related policy statements (PS18/25, PS19/25, PS8/25, PS14/25), and supporting methodologies (SoP5/25, SS4/25, amendments to SoP2/23)
*Capital Calculation Transition – Prepare systems and processes to transition from current capital calculation methodologies to Basel 3
Removal of CCR and CVA calculations for derivatives
Key Dates
31 March 2026– Deadline for firms wishing to enter the SDDT regime to notify the PRA and benefit from the simplified framework at implementation.DEADLINE
1 January 2027– Implementation date for the simplified capital regime for SDDTs; the Interim Capital Regime will no longer apply.
2026 (specific date TBD)– PRA to make final rules and policy covering the entire Basel 3.1 package once HM Treasury makes commencement regulations to revoke relevant CRR provisions.
2027 (specific date TBD)– PRA to implement restatement of CRR requirements (PS19/25).
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
What Changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
*Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission** from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
*Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits** calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the tim
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
*Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF, under which SECO operates) has published an update to the Annex of the Ordinance of 16 December 2022 on measures concerning Haiti, reflecting UN Security Council amendments to the sanctions list. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it triggers immediate asset freeze checks and reporting obligations to ensure compliance with Switzerland's implementation of UN sanctions via FINMA and SECO oversight, avoiding enforcement risks amid Haiti's ongoing instability. The update aligns with global renewals of Haiti sanctions, emphasizing asset freezes on newly designated individuals and entities involved in destabilizing activities.
#
What Changed
Amendment to the Annex of the Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti, incorporating UN Security Council updates to the sanctions list, likely adding individuals, companies, or organizations subject to asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargo expansions.
Reflects broader UN measures, including renewal of travel bans, asset freezes, and arms embargoes; expansion of arms embargo scope to military goods, technology, technical assistance, financial services, and brokeri
What You Need To Do
Screening and Freezing
Ongoing Monitoring
Licensing Checks
Documentation
Key Dates
Immediate (publication date: 21 October 2025)- Swiss firms must check accounts, freeze assets or economic resources of newly listed persons without prior notice, and report to SECO/FINMA without delay.DEADLINE
18 October 2024- UN Security Council Resolution 2752 adopted, expanding arms embargo (basis for Swiss/UK updates).
17-20 October 2025- UNSC renews regime for one year, adds 2 entries to sanctions list (UK/Jersey notices align with Swiss publication).
23 July 2025- UK Haiti Sanctions Amendment Regulations enter force, reflecting similar UN changes.
20 March 2025- Canadian amendments add 3 individuals (related context).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting requirements carry criminal penalties for non-compliance (e.g., aligned with UK fines up to updated monetary levels); failure risks FINMA enforcement, reputational damage, and misalignment with UN obligations amid Haiti's volatile security. Matter
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Public offer Prospectus Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF announces new measures to facilitate access to listing
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The PRA has published LIAC02/25, a consultation on proposed low impact amendments to rules and policy.
AI Analysis
The PRA's LIAC02/25 consultation, published on 16 October 2025, proposes low-impact amendments to its Rulebook and policy materials, including technical fixes, conditional disapplications, and miscellaneous corrections to enhance accuracy and align with prior policies. These changes matter for PRA-regulated firms as they ensure regulatory consistency with minimal operational burden, with most taking effect in late 2025 or early 2026 following the consultation period.
#
What Changed
The main proposals include:
Conditional disapplication of PRA General Provisions to implement deference arrangements under the UK-Swiss Berne Financial Services Agreement.
Amendment to Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions (TMTP) Part, Rule 5.2, introducing a new formula for 'Wr' effective 31 December 2025, using existing 'Wq' values without retrospective recalculation.
Amendment to Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (ISPV) Part, Solvency Requirements Rule 2.2A(3), clarifying the 'no co-mi
What You Need To Do
Submit consultation responses by 13 November 2025 via the PRA's Low Impact Amendments Process page, focusing on proposed disapplications, TMTP formula, ISPV rules, and miscellaneous changes
Review and update internal policies for TMTP calculations to adopt the new 'Wr' formula from 31 December 2025 year-end, without restating priors
Confirm compliance with ISPV 'no co-mingling' clarifications and SS2/25 updates by 23 December 2025
Verify Rulebook references (e
For friendly societies/credit unions
Key Dates
13 November 2025Consultation closes for LIAC02/25 responses.
21 October 2025Effectiveness of Solvency II restatement amendments (from prior consultations).
23 December 2025Effectiveness of ISPV Rule 2.2A(3), TMTP Rule 5.2A(3), minimum fees reduction, and related SS2/25 updates; also LIAF03/25 amendments per industry reports.
19 January 2026Effectiveness of Securitisation Part Rule 2, Article 7 amendment aligning with FSMA revocations.
24 July 2025Effectiveness of certain non-substantive Solvency II fixes (already passed).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low – These are explicitly "low impact" technical, typographical, and alignment amendments with no material capital, reporting, or operational shifts expected; many stem from prior consultations (e.g., CP8/25, CP12/23, PS10/25) and avoid retrospective changes. Firms should act promptly on r
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
#
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from £44,000 variable pay to £660,000 total pay (with variable pay ≤33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferra
What You Need To Do
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
Embed SMR-linked adjustments
For dual-regulated firms
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accoun
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
PS16/25 is the PRA's policy statement restating firm-facing organisational requirements from the MiFID Org Reg (e.g., outsourcing, record-keeping, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance) into the PRA Rulebook, with no material changes, to align with HMT's revocation of the EU regulation under FSMA 2023. This matters because it ensures continuity of prudential oversight for PRA-authorised firms post-revocation, preventing enforcement gaps in systems and controls while adapting provisions (e.g., supervisory function) to UK governance structures.
#
What Changed
Restatement of requirements: Provisions from MiFID Org Reg Articles on outsourcing, record-keeping, control procedures, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance are transferred verbatim or with minor clarifications into PRA Rulebook parts (e.g., Risk Control).
Supervisory function adjustment: Following consultation feedback, PRA retained Article 25 provisions but substituted "governing body" for "supervisory function" to fit UK firm structures, preserving board-level oversight
What You Need To Do
Review and map existing MiFID Org Reg compliance processes against restated PRA Rulebook provisions (e
Confirm governing body oversight aligns with adapted Article 25 requirements; document any adjustments for UK structures
Update internal references in algorithmic trading governance documents to new rule 2
Conduct gap analysis and training on minor clarifications; prepare for dual FCA/PRA alignment if applicable
Monitor HMT commencement order; if delayed, reassess implementation plans
Key Dates
9 October 2025- PRA publishes PS16/25 with final rules and feedback to CP9/25 consultation.
23 October 2025- New PRA rules and technical standards come into force, coinciding with HMT's anticipated revocation of MiFID Org Reg via commencement order (FCA rules align on same date).
Prior to 23 October 2025- HMT expected to lay second Statutory Instrument revoking remaining MiFID Org Reg provisions; PRA may delay/revoke rules if not made.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act promptly as rules take effect on 23 October 2025 (past deadline as of current date), with no transition period; non-compliance risks enforcement gaps in core systems/controls post-revocation. Impact is low for substance (restatement only) but requires documentation upd
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA today published guidance on the extension of the transitional period for exchange of collateral in certain OTC derivatives transactions. The current transitional period runs until 1 January 2026 and will be extended by a further three years.
AI Analysis
FINMA extended the transitional period for collateral exchange requirements in non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2029, providing Swiss market participants with three additional years of relief from mandatory collateral posting obligations on certain equity derivatives. This extension aligns Swiss regulation with the EU's indefinite exemption introduced in December 2024, preventing competitive disadvantages for Swiss derivatives traders while a permanent regulatory framework is developed.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change is the extension of the transitional period under Article 131 paragraph 5bis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance (FinMIO). Specifically:
Previous deadline: January 1, 2026
New deadline: January 1, 2029
Scope: Applies to non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions involving equity options, index options, and equity basket derivatives that are not cleared through a FINMA-authorized or recognized central counterparty
Regulatory basis: FINMA Guidanc
What You Need To Do
*Acknowledge the extended timeline
*Maintain risk management controls
*Monitor FinMIA revision
*Document compliance rationale
*Assess competitive positioning
Key Dates
October 9, 2025- FINMA Guidance 04/2025 published and takes effect immediately
January 1, 2029- New expiration date for the transitional period; collateral exchange obligations become mandatory unless further extended or a permanent framework is adopted
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement.
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate sustainability reporting: AMF’s response to EFRAG’s consultation on the simplification of European standards
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, responded to EFRAG's July 31, 2025, public consultation on simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming a 57% reduction in mandatory datapoints and 55% shorter standards while urging refinements in materiality, climate reporting, and financial effects disclosure. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming proportionate ESRS revisions that could ease reporting burdens for large listed companies starting voluntarily in 2026, enhancing investor usability without diluting key sustainability insights.
#
What Changed
AMF endorses EFRAG's simplifications but proposes targeted adjustments:
Materiality assessment: Support for proportionate double materiality (impacts, risks, opportunities or IRO) but requires minimum specification of impact type (positive/negative, risk, opportunity); prefers "gross" approach (pre-mitigation) over complex mitigated impacts for investor relevance and consistency.
Climate reporting: Regrets removal of "net zero" definition (90-95% gross GHG reduction trajectory), essential for 20
What You Need To Do
Monitor EFRAG's post-consultation technical advice (end-November 2025) and EC adoption process; prepare for voluntary uptake in 2026 reporting cycles
Listed companies
Conduct or update materiality assessments per EFRAG guidance (e
Prepare xHTML digital tagging for sustainability statements in management reports
French firms
Key Dates
July 31, 2025- EFRAG publishes draft simplified ESRS for public consultation.
September 29, 2025- Consultation closes.
End of November 2025- EFRAG submits technical advice to European Commission.
2026 financial year (reports in 2027)- Voluntary application of simplified standards, if legislative timeline allows.
2027 (reports in 2028)- Full mandatory application targeted.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not immediate mandates, as this is a consultation response with voluntary 2026 start, but proactive preparation is essential for large listed firms facing AMF scrutiny on 2025/2026 statements. Matters due to potential burden reduction (57% fewer datapoints) balanced by AMF's push f
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 30 September 2025
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/47 mandates a regular survey by Luxembourg credit institutions on the amount of covered deposits as of **30 September 2025**, focusing on eligible and covered deposits under the Law of 18 December 2015 on deposit guarantee schemes. It matters because it ensures accurate reporting to the Conseil de protection des déposants et des investisseurs (CPDI) for FGDL (Fonds de garantie des dépôts Luxembourg) compliance, with detailed field-by-field instructions for complex accounts like omnibus and trusts.
#
What Changed
This circular updates prior guidance (notably CSSF-CPDI 16/02 as amended by CSSF-CPDI 23/35) by specifying the survey reference date of 30 September 2025 and providing granular reporting fields for eligible deposits (e.g., exclusions for financial institution-like structures and life insurance products), covered deposits capped at €100,000 per person, and breakdowns by natural/legal persons, including shares in omnibus accounts, fiduciaries, trusts, sub-accounts, and segregated accounts. Key fie
What You Need To Do
For omnibus/trust accounts, obtain and report shares of identifiable entitled persons, apportion by legal status of holder, and ensure fields like 0226 and 0255 reconcile
Designated management reviews/approves data; transmit accurately to CSSF/CPDI, respecting prior circulars (e
Exclude non-creditor accounts or those assimilated to financial institutions/life insurance
Key Dates
30 September 2025- Reference date for snapshot of deposits, eligible deposits, and covered deposits.
6 October 2025- Publication date of the circular by CSSF.
31 December 2025) imply prompt post-reference date filing to CSSF/CPDI; firms should confirm via full PDF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Past reference date (30 September 2025) as of January 2026 means non-reporting firms risk immediate FGDL non-compliance, fines, or supervisory action from CSSF, but this is a routine quarterly survey (see related Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49 for December 2025). Matters for prudential r
Stress-testing Markets Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The Banque de France, the ACPR and the AMF launch a first system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 8 der Verordnung vom 4. März 2022 über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The publication announces updates by the Swiss Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) to Annex 8 of the Ordinance on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72), aligning Swiss sanctions against Russia with ongoing international restrictions. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it imposes immediate obligations to block assets, report relationships, and conduct AML checks, amid escalating sanctions that heighten compliance risks and enforcement scrutiny from FINMA.
#
What Changed
Amendments to Annexes 8, 14, 15b, and 33 of the Ordinance, though specific details on new listings or prohibitions are not detailed in the announcement.
Continuation of standard requirements: Implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO (State Secretariat for Economic Affairs).
These updates follow a pattern of prior changes, such as expanded export bans on dual-use goods (e.g., chrome ore, chemicals), transaction bans on additio
What You Need To Do
Screen and freeze assets
Report to SECO
Conduct AML due diligence
Review transactions
Document compliance
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical – Effective immediately at 23:00 on January 13, 2026, with no grace period, this demands urgent system updates, screenings, and reporting to avoid FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, licenses at risk). It amplifies AML / Financial Crime risks in a high-scrutiny environment, as FINMA's
The Securities and Exchange Commission today enhanced its efforts to assist broker-dealers and other market participants on the path to central clearing of U.S. Treasury securities, developing a one-stop webpage that puts the latest status updates, staff…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued an order granting conditional exemptive relief related to certain requirements of the National Market System Plan governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT NMS Plan), Rule 613 of Regulation NMS, and…
PS15/25 introduces **new liquidity risk reporting requirements for major UK insurance firms**, closing data gaps identified during the March 2020 "dash for cash" and September 2022 LDI crisis. The policy mandates four new reporting templates for firms with significant derivatives or securities lending exposure, with implementation deferred to **30 September 2026** to allow adequate preparation time.
What Changed
The PRA's final policy establishes the following regulatory framework:
*New Reporting Templates**
Four new liquidity reporting templates have been introduced to capture previously unavailable data:
Annual committed facilities template
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template (short form)
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template for ring-fenced funds, matching adjustment portfolios, and remaining parts
Additional supervisory reporting requirements
*Scope and Thresholds
Firms are subject to liquidity repo
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (by Q2 2026)
*Threshold Assessment
*RFF Mapping
*System Readiness
*Data Governance
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA published PS15/25 (policy statement)
31 December 2025- Original implementation deadline (now superseded)DEADLINE
30 September 2026- **Final implementation date for all liquidity reporting requirements**
First reporting reference date after 30 September 2026- Firms meeting threshold conditions must commence reportingDEADLINE
Three consecutive annual reporting reference dates- Threshold for ceasing reporting once firms fall below thresholds
SS15/16 establishes the PRA's expectations for UK insurance firms using approved internal models to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR), requiring them to maintain the ability to calculate SCR using the standard formula and submit standard formula SCR calculations for regulatory monitoring purposes. This guidance is critical because it ensures capital requirements remain reflective of actual firm risks and protects policyholder security by preventing model drift—where internal models diverge from underlying risk realities over time.
What Changed
The supervisory statement introduces several core regulatory expectations:
Internal Model Maintenance Requirement: Firms with approved internal models must maintain the capability to calculate SCR using the standard formula, even if they primarily use internal models for capital calculations.
Standard Formula SCR Reporting: Firms using approved internal models to calculate solo SCR are expected to report standard formula SCR results privately to the PRA on an annual basis.
Model Drift Monitor
What You Need To Do
*Maintain Dual Calculation Capability
*Establish Annual Reporting Process
*Integrate into Risk Management
*Obtain Senior Management Approval
*Maintain Supporting Documentation
Key Dates
25 October 2016- Original SS15/16 publication
31 December 2018- Document updated (referenced in original guidance)
September 2025- Most recent update to SS15/16 published, clarifying expectations for firms with material non-life technical provisions
Four weeks after annual quantitative reporting submission- Deadline for standard formula SCR reportingDEADLINE
30 September 2026- Implementation deadline for liquidity reporting rules (related Solvency II development)DEADLINE
Letter to chief financial officers of selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers which provides thematic feedback from the PRA’s review of written auditor reports received in 2025 covering IFRS 9 expected credit loss accounting (ECL) and accounting for climate risk.
AI Analysis
The PRA's Dear CFO Letter, issued on 30 September 2025 by David Bailey, provides thematic feedback to selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers based on its 2025 review of auditor reports on IFRS 9 expected credit loss (ECL) accounting and climate risk integration. It matters because it highlights persistent supervisory concerns around timely credit risk recognition, model limitations, recovery assumptions, and climate impacts amid economic uncertainty, urging firms to strengthen ECL processes to ensure safety and soundness.
#
What Changed
This is not a formal rule change or new regulation but thematic feedback building on prior years, with "areas of focus" for improvement:
Model risk: Elevated due to macroeconomic/geopolitical uncertainty; firms must enhance post-model adjustments (PMAs) for completeness (e.g., affordability risks, sector vulnerabilities), granular monitoring of borrower cohorts/ECL components, and model redevelopment governance.
Recovery strategies: Ongoing risk of historical bias in Loss Given Default (LGD) est
What You Need To Do
Conduct self-assessments against annex "areas of focus" (model risk, recovery, climate) and share with auditors ahead of 2026 reporting
Enhance PMAs
Model improvements
Recovery processes
Climate integration
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA issues Dear CFO Letter with thematic feedback.
2025- Auditor reports reviewed by PRA (basis for this feedback).
2026- Next round of written auditor reporting on firms' progress against areas of focus, including data aggregation and securitisation impacts; firms encouraged to self-assess now.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Persistent issues from prior years (e.g., 2024 feedback) indicate elevated model risk in uncertain conditions could lead to PRA scrutiny, auditor findings, or enforcement if unaddressed; 2026 auditor reports will benchmark progress, risking heightened supervision. Matters for prudent
Single Resolution Fund – Information request by the Single Resolution Board for the calculation of the 2026 contribution according to Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CODERES 25/21, issued by the CSSF on 29 September 2025, mandates Luxembourg credit institutions to submit specific data via XBRL-formatted Data Reporting Forms (DRFs) to enable the Single Resolution Board (SRB) to calculate 2026 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) under Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63. This matters because non-compliance risks SRB using estimates, applying the highest risk multiplier, or penalties, ensuring the financial sector funds resolution costs without taxpayer burden.
#
What Changed
Introduces data collection for 2026 SRF contributions, conditional on SRB verifying SRF funds fall below 1% of covered deposits in the Banking Union by early 2026.
Mandates XBRL submission of DRFs (except restatements up to 2022 in Excel); provides templates in Annexes 3a, 4, 5 (User Guide), and 7a/7b for additional assurances.
Additional assurance requirements (e.g., auditor reports or Agreed-Upon Procedures - AUP) apply conditionally to ECB-supervised institutions unless under lump-sum payment
What You Need To Do
Download and complete DRF using Annexes (e
For ECB-supervised institutions
Align internal systems with CSSF templates early; validate data to avoid SRB assumptions under Article 17(1) DR
30 November 2025- SRB decision deadline on whether to calculate/collect 2026 SRF contributions based on DRFs (triggers full additional assurance application).DEADLINE
15 January 2026- ECB-supervised institutions submit AUP or auditor reports on restatements to CSSF resolution department.
16 January 2026, 24:00 CET- All institutions submit completed DRF in XBRL to CSSF; late/incomplete submissions lead to SRB estimates or highest risk multiplier.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - The 16 January 2026 deadline is imminent (today is 25 January 2026), risking immediate SRB penalties like estimates or maximum risk multipliers if submissions are missed/inaccurate; affects capital planning as contributions directly impact prudential positions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today published a concept release soliciting public comment on how to improve current SEC rules governing residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and certain aspects of asset-backed securities (ABS) generally…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Ken Johnson, who has been serving as Chief Operating Officer (COO) since December 2017, will retire from the agency in December. “Ken has been an integral leader at the SEC for more than two…
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its two managers a total of €1.3 million
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Altaroc Partners €600,000 and its senior managers Maurice Tchenio (€500,000) and Patrick de Giovanni (€200,000) a total of €1.3 million on 15 September 2025 for breaches of professional obligations, including non-operational investment procedures, inadequate AML/CFT due diligence, deficient marketing materials, and unproven benefits from fee retrocessions to distributors. This decision underscores the AMF's heightened scrutiny on operational controls and senior accountability in asset management, serving as a critical enforcement signal for firms to strengthen procedures amid a pattern of similar sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new legislation, but it reinforces and clarifies existing professional obligations under AMF regulations for asset managers (sociétés de gestion), particularly under the AIFM regime. Key expectations highlighted include:
Operational investment/divestment procedures: Must be fully implemented, with traceability of checks on lender authorizations and compliance with fund policies.
AML/CFT due diligence: Systematic verification required on fund assets and l
What You Need To Do
Audit procedures immediately
Enhance AML/CFT systems
Validate marketing and fees
Senior manager training
Mock AMF inspections
Key Dates
15 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines on Altaroc Partners, Maurice Tchenio, and Patrick de Giovanni.
16 September 2025- French version of press release published.
Post-15 September 2025 (exact date unspecified)- Appeal lodged by Altaroc Partners, Tchenio, and de Giovanni before the Conseil d’État against decision SAN-2025-09.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This fits a 2025 enforcement trend targeting asset managers' operational deficiencies (e.g., similar fines against Novaxia Investissement on 10 December 2025, M Capital Partners on 31 December 2025, and Eternam on 9 September 2025), signaling AMF's zero-tolerance for non-operational
Long term investment Sustainable Finance Retail investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Sustainable finance: retail investors have higher expectations of their financial advisors
The PRA's CP21/25 proposes deletion of 37 banking regulatory reporting templates—primarily 34 FINREP templates representing approximately one-third of all FINREP collections—as the first phase of its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme. This initiative aims to reduce annual reporting burden by approximately £26 million while maintaining supervisory effectiveness by eliminating duplicative, outdated, or low-value data collections.
What Changed
The PRA proposes the following regulatory deletions:
*FINREP Template Deletions:**
Permanent deletion of 34 whole FINREP reporting templates (approximately one-third of all FINREP collections)
Consolidation of remaining FINREP requirements within a single section of the PRA Rulebook
Clarification of scoping conditions where current provisions are unclear, duplicative, or inconsistently applied
Alignment of reporting remittance dates for FINREP reporting
*Other Template Deletions:**
Two COREP t
What You Need To Do
*Cease reporting on the 37 deleted templates effective 31 December 2025
*Update internal systems and processes to remove validation rules and submission workflows for deleted templates
*Revise compliance calendars to reflect aligned FINREP reporting remittance dates
*Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations to identify any continued requirements based on deleted FINREP templates and assess whether disclosure obligations remain despite template deletion
*Implement rulebook changes reflecting consolidation of FINREP scoping provisions into the PRA Rulebook
Key Dates
September 2025- CP21/25 consultation paper published
31 December 2025- Proposed implementation date to avoid firms submitting 2025 Q4 data for deleted templates
8 December 2025- PS27/25 (Policy Statement) published, confirming final policy
Supervision Other professionals Fintech Market Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers European supervision of capital markets: the AMF calls for an enhanced...
CP20/25 is a PRA consultation paper published on 16 September 2025 that proposes targeted updates to the regulatory framework governing third-country insurance branches operating in the UK. The consultation addresses inconsistencies introduced during the Solvency II review, clarifies supervisory expectations, and increases the subsidiarisation threshold—matters that directly affect the operational and compliance costs of non-UK insurers seeking to maintain branch operations rather than establish subsidiaries in the UK market.
What Changed
The consultation proposes four primary regulatory modifications:
*Subsidiarisation Threshold Increase
The PRA proposes raising the FSCS liability threshold above which third-country branches must establish a UK subsidiary from £500 million to £600 million**. The PRA attributes this increase to inflation rather than organic growth, aiming to prevent branches from artificially approaching the current threshold and incurring unnecessary subsidiarisation costs.
*ORSA Reporting Clarification
Curren
What You Need To Do
*Threshold Assessment
*Reporting Requirement Review
*Quantitative Metrics Compliance
*Three-Year Notification Obligation
*Asset Holding Verification
Key Dates
16 September 2025- CP20/25 published by the PRA
16 December 2025- Consultation response deadlineDEADLINE
H1 2026- Statement of Policy (SoP) expected to be published; subsidiarisation threshold update anticipated upon SoP publication
31 December 2026- Planned implementation date for rulebook changes
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is today publishing guidance on the disclosure of cryptobased assets in the annual financial statements of banks and securities firms. It is thereby addressing ambiguities that have arisen since the DLT Act entered into force. FINMA emphasises that the existing duties of disclosure must continue to be complied with and provides clarifications.
The 2024 insurance market report, which was published today by FINMA, offers an overview of the Swiss insurance market last year. Swiss insurance companies achieved aggregate annual profits of CHF 10.4 billion in 2024, which represents a 24% decrease over the previous year. While life and non-life insurers were able to increase their profits, reinsurers recorded a significant decline.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 7 der Verordnung vom 11. November 2015 über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran (SR 946.231.143.6) publiziert.
AI Analysis
On August 18, 2025, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (WBF) published an updated sanctions notification regarding Iran, specifically modifying Annex 7 of the Ordinance on Measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran (SR 946.231.143.6). This update is critical for Swiss financial institutions and businesses because it reflects the evolving sanctions landscape following the automatic reinstatement of UN Security Council resolutions on Iran's nuclear program in September 2025.
What Changed
The August 2025 notification updated the list of designated persons, entities, and organizations subject to Swiss sanctions against Iran. While the search results do not provide the specific details of individual entries added or removed from Annex 7, this type of notification typically reflects changes to the UN Security Council's consolidated sanctions list that Switzerland is obligated to implement under its Embargo Act (EmbG).
The broader context shows that Switzerland was preparing for sig
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance obligations
*Sanctions List Screening
*Transaction Review
*Account Monitoring
*Policy Updates
Key Dates
August 18, 2025- WBF published updated sanctions notification for Iran (Annex 7 modifications)
August 28, 2025- Germany, France, and UK triggered UN snapback mechanism
September 15, 2025- Harmonization of sanctions ordinances entered into force (affecting financial sanctions procedures across multiple jurisdictions including Iran)
September 27, 2025- UN nuclear-related sanctions against Iran automatically reinstated
September 28, 2025- EU reactivated suspended sanctions related to Iran's proliferation activities
Adoption of the EBA Guidelines on internal policies, procedures and controls to ensure the implementation of Union and national restrictive measures (sanctions)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/896 adopts the EBA Guidelines EBA/GL/2024/14 and EBA/GL/2024/15, mandating Luxembourg financial institutions to establish robust internal policies, procedures, and controls for complying with EU and national restrictive measures (sanctions). This matters because it sets binding EU-wide standards to prevent sanctions violations and circumvention, with absolute obligations for immediate asset freezing and reporting, amid escalating geopolitical tensions.
#
What Changed
Institutions must develop, implement, and maintain up-to-date policies, procedures, and controls for identifying, investigating, and applying restrictive measures without delay, including risk management for violations and circumvention.
Management body responsibilities expanded: approve sanctions compliance strategy, oversee implementation, conduct at least annual assessments of exposure and controls, ensure remedial actions, and report deficiencies.
Screening and monitoring requirements: Maint
What You Need To Do
Conduct annual exposure assessments to sanctions risks and circumvention; update policies accordingly
Appoint senior management/board-level responsibility for approving and overseeing sanctions strategy, including annual reviews and deficiency reporting
Implement reliable screening systems for customers, transactions, and lists; define screenable datasets; test systems regularly for effectiveness (e
Provide documented training to relevant staff on sanctions, institutional exposure, and internal processes
Establish processes for immediate action on matches: suspend transfers, freeze assets, report to Ministry of Finance/CSSF/FIU without delay; maintain whitelists only under strict conditions
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With less than 12 months until the 30 December 2025 deadline (as of January 2026), firms face binding requirements for absolute compliance, including personal accountability for management bodies; non-compliance risks enforcement by CSSF, reputational damage, and fines amid frequent
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 7. August 1990 über Wirtschaftsmassnahmen gegenüber der Republik Irak (SR 946.206) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) published an updated sanctions notification on August 13, 2025, reflecting modifications to the UN sanctions list targeting Iraq under the Ordinance of August 7, 1990 (SR 946.206). This update is automatically applicable in Switzerland and requires immediate compliance by all financial institutions and regulated entities, as Switzerland implements UN Security Council sanctions lists without delay through its automatic application framework.
What Changed
The UN Sanctions Committee modified the list of sanctioned individuals, companies, and organizations subject to Iraq-related sanctions on August 5, 2025. The specific modifications to the sanctions list were incorporated into Switzerland's SESAM database (SECO Sanctions Management), which serves as the authoritative sanctions reference for Swiss compliance purposes. Under Switzerland's automatic application ordinance adopted by the Federal Council on March 4, 2016, amendments to UN Security Coun
What You Need To Do
*Update screening systems immediately - Integrate the August 5, 2025 modifications into transaction monitoring and customer due diligence systems
*Review existing customer relationships - Screen all current customers, counterparties, and beneficial owners against the updated SESAM database
*Audit transaction history - Identify any transactions processed between August 5-13, 2025 that may have involved newly sanctioned parties
*Document compliance procedures - Maintain records demonstrating implementation of updated sanctions screening
*Train compliance staff - Ensure all relevant personnel understand the updated sanctions list and screening requirements
Key Dates
August 5, 2025- UN Sanctions Committee decision modifying the Iraq sanctions list
August 13, 2025- SECO published the updated sanctions notification and SESAM database modifications
Immediate- Effective date in Switzerland (automatic application upon UN modification)
Das Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat die Erweiterung der Sanktionslisten betreffend Russland publiziert. Die Schweiz hat damit diverse Änderungen übernommen, welche die EU im Rahmen ihres 18. Sanktionspakets beschlossen hatte.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces Switzerland's adoption of the EU's 18th sanctions package against Russia, expanding the sanctions lists with new designations and restrictions via the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO/WBF). It matters because Swiss financial institutions must immediately screen and freeze assets of newly listed parties, aligning with heightened FINMA enforcement on Russia sanctions risks amid ongoing geopolitical tensions. Compliance teams face elevated legal, reputational, and secondary sanctions exposure from US/EU measures.
#
What Changed
The core update involves Switzerland incorporating EU Council decisions from the 18th sanctions package, which typically include:
Additions to asset freeze lists targeting Russian individuals, entities, and sectors like energy, finance, and dual-use goods.
Expanded prohibitions on making funds or economic resources available to designated parties.
Alignment with EU sectoral restrictions on Russia's financial messaging services (e.g., SPFS), oil trade, and shadow fleet activities, now binding in
What You Need To Do
Screen sanctions lists immediately
Enhance customer due diligence (CDD)
Report to FINMA/SECO
Update policies
Train staff
Key Dates
Immediate upon publication (August 13, 2025)- Swiss sanctions lists updated; asset freezes and prohibitions take effect instantly for newly designated parties.
15 December 2025- Noted FINMA reference for ongoing list updates and independent freezing measures.
31 July 2026- EU sectoral sanctions against Russia renewed until this date (adopted December 2025), influencing Swiss alignment.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This directly expands enforceable prohibitions, with FINMA's targeted on-site reviews and "very high" Russia sanctions risk rating amplifying enforcement (https://www.finma.ch/en/~/media/finma/dokumente/dokumentencenter/myfinma/finma-publikationen/risikomonitor/20251117-finma-risikom
On July 31, 2025, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) amended the annex to the Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance (SR 196.127.27), originally enacted March 7, 2025, to update the list of designated individuals subject to comprehensive asset freezes. This amendment reflects Switzerland's ongoing implementation of targeted financial sanctions against politically exposed persons connected to the former Assad regime, requiring immediate compliance from all financial intermediaries and asset holders operating in Swiss jurisdiction.
What Changed
The July 31, 2025 amendment modified the annex (list of designated persons) to the Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance without altering the substantive freezing requirements themselves. The original ordinance, enacted March 7, 2025, froze all assets of 17 designated individuals; the July amendment adjusted this list, though the specific names added or removed are not detailed in the available regulatory notices.
The amendment operates under the Federal Act on the Freezing and Restitution of Illicit
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance steps for financial institutions:
*Update sanctions screening systems to reflect the amended annex list as of July 31, 2025
*Freeze all assets of newly designated individuals without delay, including bank accounts, securities, real estate, and other property of any kind
*File mandatory reports with the Money Laundering Reporting Office (MROS) for all frozen assets under Article 3 of the FIAA
*Conduct enhanced due diligence on existing client relationships to identify any connections to designated persons or their family members, associates, or controlled entities
Key Dates
March 7, 2025, 6:00 PM UTC– Original Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance entered into force
July 31, 2025, 6:00 PM UTC– Amendment to annex (list of designated persons) entered into force
Ongoing– Immediate freezing obligation upon designation; no grace period applies
Four-year validity– The ordinance remains valid for four years from March 7, 2025, unless extended or modified
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Disclosure Obligations Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a Danish investment bank for breaches of professional obligations committed by a French branch
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a €300,000 fine on Saxo Bank A/S on 16 July 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations committed through its French branch, including failures to properly inform clients about significant changes to derivatives procedures, margin calculations, and securities transaction incidents, as well as deficiencies in equity savings plan (PEA) transfers. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's active oversight of cross-border investment banks operating in France and highlights critical gaps in client disclosure practices that compliance teams must address.
What Changed
The enforcement decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies existing obligations under current French financial regulations. The key compliance expectations reinforced include:
Client notification requirements for significant procedural changes affecting derivatives trading and margin calculations
Incident disclosure obligations for securities transactions that could materially affect order execution
Timely information provision regarding regulatory consequences
What You Need To Do
*Implement incident reporting protocols for securities transactions that could affect order execution, with documented evidence of timely client notification
*Review PEA transfer procedures to ensure compliance with regulatory timeframes and proper documentation of information provided to clients regarding Brexit-related consequences
*Strengthen information governance to ensure all material operational changes are communicated to clients within required timeframes and with appropriate detail
*Conduct compliance training for front-office and operations staff on professional obligations regarding client communication and information disclosure
Key Dates
16 July 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued imposing €300,000 fine
22 July 2025- Official publication of enforcement decision
No specified deadline- Appeal period available (no specific timeframe stated in the decision)
MAR Financial disclosures & corporate financing Shares The AMF and the AFA call for vigilance of the risk of private corruption by criminal networks of natural persons with access to inside information
Sanctions & settlements MAR professional obligations Investment advice Other professionals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines eight individuals and two legal entities a total of €1,890,000 for late...
Supervision Governance Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on asset management companies' voting and engagement policies
Long term investment Equity Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers French retail investor stock market activity: the AMF analyses changes in behaviour between...
Risk and Trend Mapping Markets Fixed income Asset management Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Fintech The AMF publishes its 2025 Markets and Risk Outlook
On 3 July 2025, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA launched the consultations on the new Ordinances on the Risk Diversification of Banks and Securities Firms and on the Liquidity of Banks and Securities Firms. The consultations will go on until 29 September 2025.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment has published its 2024 Annual Report
Sanctions & settlements MAR Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an issuer €20,000 and its shareholders a total of €1.7 million
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling €1.72 million on 10 June 2025 against SMCP (an issuer) and its major shareholders European TopSoho, Dynamic Treasure Group, and Ms. Chenran Qiu for breaches including failure to report threshold crossings in shareholdings, disseminating false or misleading information constituting market manipulation, and SMCP's lapse in maintaining inside information confidentiality. This decision underscores AMF's rigorous enforcement of **Market Abuse Regulation (MAR)** obligations on issuers and shareholders, serving as a deterrent against opaque share transactions and premature disclosures that undermine market integrity. Compliance teams should prioritize robust monitoring of ownership changes and information controls to avoid similar sanctions, which can reach seven figures for individuals and entities.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change introducing new rules; it reinforces existing obligations under French financial markets law and MAR:
Shareholder reporting thresholds: Mandatory notification to AMF and issuers for crossing above or below capital/voting rights thresholds, plus six-month plans.
Prohibition on false/misleading information: Press releases denying control over entities when factual arrangements prove otherwise qualify as market manipulation.
Inside informatio
What You Need To Do
Shareholders
Key Dates
10 June 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines.
Post-10 June 2025- Appeal window opened; European TopSoho lodged appeal before Paris Court of Appeal.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to substantial fines (€1.72M total, including €1M personal), personal liability for controllers, and appeal pending, signaling ongoing risk. Not critical as it's backward-looking enforcement (events 2016-2021), but elevates priority for listed firms handling ownership c
Marketing Long term investment Other professionals Retail investors Journalists The stock market investor journey: the AMF analyses the mobile applications of 14 institutions
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF orders DANAE GROUP to file a draft takeover bid for ENTREPRENDRE shares
AI Analysis
The AMF has ordered Danae Group to file a draft takeover bid for shares in Entreprendre, enforcing mandatory public offer rules triggered by a shareholding threshold crossing. This matters for compliance professionals as it exemplifies AMF's strict oversight of takeover regulations, ensuring market integrity, equal treatment of shareholders, and timely disclosures in listed company transactions. It underscores the risks of non-compliance, potentially leading to enforcement actions.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement decision applying existing AMF rules on mandatory takeover bids under the General Regulation (RGAMF), particularly Articles 234-2 et seq. Key requirements include: filing a draft offer with the AMF for compliance review within 10 trading days; mandatory cash offers at the highest price paid by the offeror (alone or in concert) in the prior 12 months; adherence to principles of free play of bids, equal treatment, transparency, marke
What You Need To Do
File draft takeover bid immediately
Appoint independent appraiser
Inform AMF and publish
Prepare target response
Monitor thresholds
Key Dates
Within 4-6 weeks of triggering event- Danae Group must file draft takeover bid (practice standard; exact trigger date not specified in publication).DEADLINE
10 trading days from offer period start- AMF reviews draft for compliance and issues visa (extendable if appraiser or works council involved, min. 5 trading days post-target reply).DEADLINE
Pre-offer period (post-announcement)- Strict trading rules apply; offeror may acquire shares until opening, with restrictions.
Offer period- From AMF filing notice to results publication; minimum success threshold 50% (waivable by AMF).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate filing obligation for Danae Group risks escalation to sanctions if ignored; for others, it signals AMF's proactive enforcement, heightening scrutiny on share acquisitions in listed firms. Matters due to potential market disruption, shareholder protection mandates, and prece
Asset management MMF The AMF applies ESMA's guidelines on updating stress scenario parameters, in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation
Cooperation Europe & international The AMF applies the joint guidelines issued by the European Supervisory Authorities to facilitate the exchange of information between National Competent Authorities
Asset management Individual investment mandate Fees: the AMF updates its doctrine following the announcement of the abolition of transaction fees in situations of discretionary management
Market infrastructures Innovation Europe & international Cooperation Other professionals Market Infrastructures Journalists Investment management companies The French and Italian authorities make proposals for a more competitive...
AI Analysis
The French (AMF) and Italian (Consob) financial authorities have jointly proposed amendments to the EU's DLT Pilot Regime to increase its competitiveness and attract market participants. The Pilot Regime, which became operational in March 2023, has underperformed with only three authorized infrastructures and minimal live trading activity, prompting regulators to recommend structural changes including greater proportionality, expanded eligible instruments, and raised activity thresholds.
What Changed
The proposed amendments address the Pilot Regime's limited uptake by introducing the following regulatory modifications:
*Scope Expansion
Expand eligible financial instruments from current restrictions to all financial assets**
Remove categorical limitations that previously restricted participation
*Activity Thresholds
Raise activity thresholds from €6 billion to €100 billion
Introduce greater proportionality based on project scale**, allowing smaller players simplified requirements
*Operatio
What You Need To Do
*For Market Infrastructure Operators
*Reassess Business Cases
*Prepare Applications
*Monitor Commission Decisions
*Compliance Documentation
Key Dates
March 24, 2026- ESMA report deadline to European Commission on Pilot Regime functioning and recommendationsDEADLINE
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period; full crypto-asset regime implementation
Q2 2026- Expected European Commission report to Parliament and Council with recommendations on Pilot Regime extension, amendment, or permanent conversion
April 9, 2025- AMF and Consob formal proposals submitted
Mid-2022- Original DLT Pilot Regime legislation enacted
Marketing Derivatives or structured products Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF and ACPR Joint Unit publishes its analysis of the French structured product market
Europe & international Cooperation Financial stability, artificial intelligence, data quality and financial education at the heart of the discussions at the AMF 2025 international seminar for securities regulators
Employee savings scheme Retail investors Journalists Employee savings: employees and firms are genuinely satisfied, but there is still a great need for support and education
Artificial intelligence Markets Innovation The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) publishes a report on artificial intelligence in financial markets
Anti-money Laundering Asset management AMF invites financial market participants to take part in the EBA consultation on draft AML/CFT implementing standards
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French financial market participants to engage in the EBA's consultation launched on March 6, 2025, on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for AML/CFT implementing standards under AMLD6 and AMLR, focusing on harmonized risk assessment methodologies for supervisors and obliged entities. This matters because it signals a shift to uniform EU-wide AML/CFT supervision via AMLA (post-EBA handover on January 1, 2026), requiring firms to adapt to standardized risk indicators, data reporting, and enforcement, with new CDD rules applying from July 2027. Participation ensures firms influence final standards amid the transition to a single EU AML rulebook.
#
What Changed
The draft RTS propose harmonized methodologies for AML/CFT supervision, including:
Risk Assessment of Obliged Entities (Article 40(2) AMLD6): A three-step process with indicators for inherent risk (customers, products/services, geography, distribution channels), control effectiveness (governance, policies, procedures, group supervision), and residual risk; annual reviews and ad-hoc reassessments; standardized scoring for consistent EU supervision.
Risk Assessment for Direct Supervision (Article
What You Need To Do
Participate in EBA consultation
Conduct compliance gap analysis
Enhance systems
Prepare for AMLA supervision
Ongoing monitoring
Key Dates
March 6, 2025 - EBA consultation launchon draft RTS for AML/CFT standards (ongoing as of analysis).
January 1, 2026 - EBA hands over AML/CFT mandates, tools (e.g., EuReCa database), and functions to AMLA; existing EBA guidelines remain until replaced.
July 10, 2027 - New AMLD6/AMLR rules apply directly, including CDD for new customers and start of phased compliance.DEADLINE
By July 2032 - Full CDD compliancefor existing customers (five-year transition from 2027).
2028 - AMLA begins direct supervisionof selected high-risk entities.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not yet final, the consultation shapes binding RTS under the new AMLA-led regime post-January 2026 handover, with direct rules from July 2027 requiring system upgrades and data readiness; delays risk non-compliance with harmonized supervision, higher sanctions, and AMLA scrutin
Markets Europe & international Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers The AMF calls on the European Commission for an ambitious strategy on the Savings and Investments Union project
Artificial intelligence Innovation Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures Markets The AMF shares the lessons learned from its latest experiments with automated processing of regulatory data
Supervision Asset management Collective investments UCIT Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of its thematic inspections of asset management...
Prospectus Fixed income Sustainable Finance Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF approves its first bond prospectus for European green bonds under the ‘EuGB’ standard
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published an analysis of the performance of the French real estate crowdfunding market, based on data collected from the 10 largest platforms in terms of inflows.
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Pharnext and its former directors a total of €800,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined Pharnext €500,000 and its former directors Daniel Cohen (€200,000) and David Horn Solomon (€100,000) on 20 January 2025 for failing to disclose inside information promptly and disseminating false or misleading information about FDA interactions for a drug candidate. This enforcement action reinforces AMF's strict stance on market abuse rules under EU MAR, highlighting personal liability for directors in listed biotech firms where investor expectations around product approvals are high. Compliance teams should note it as a reminder of timely disclosure obligations, especially amid appeals filed by the parties.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement decision applying existing obligations under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), specifically:
Article 17 MAR: Requirement to disclose inside information as soon as possible (breached by Pharnext's delays from 10 April 2019 and non-disclosure from 28 October 2020).
Article 12(1)(c) MAR: Prohibition on disseminating false or misleading information that could affect market prices, via press releases and shareholder letters overstating FDA progress.
What You Need To Do
Review inside information policies
Audit communications
Director training
Monitor appeals
wide actions mandated beyond general MAR compliance, but proactive gap analysis recommended
Key Dates
10 April 2019- FDA request for additional study deemed inside information; not disclosed until 30 August 2019.
28 October 2020- FDA 'non-agreement' on clinical study design deemed inside information; never publicly disclosed.
20 January 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines (SAN-2025-01).
23 July 2025- Paris Court of Appeal dismissed David Horn Solomon's stay of execution application (n°25/05331).
Post-20 January 2025- Appeal lodged by Pharnext, Cohen, and Solomon to Paris Court of Appeal (ongoing).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is a specific enforcement (not a new rule), but it signals heightened AMF scrutiny on biotech disclosures amid investor sensitivity to approval news; delays in similar cases could trigger investigations/fines up to 15% of turnover or €15M. Matters for listed firms with pipelin
Sanctions & settlements MAR Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a US investment fund and its director a total of €10 million for price manipulation during an initial public offering...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined US-based investment fund EcoR1 Capital €7 million and its director Oleg Nodelman €3 million (total €10 million) on 13 December 2024 for price manipulation via "marking the close" trades on Euronext Paris during Innate Pharma's 2019 Nasdaq IPO, plus reporting failures on 5% ownership thresholds. This case demonstrates AMF's extraterritorial reach over foreign actors impacting French markets and underscores personal liability for executives in market abuse violations under MAR.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing MAR prohibitions on price manipulation (Article 12), specifically "fixing the price at an abnormal or artificial level" through timed sales at market close to influence linked ADS pricing on Nasdaq. It also highlights ongoing scrutiny of reporting obligations under Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code for crossing 5% thresholds in listed companies.
#
What You Need To Do
Implement pre-trade surveillance for "marking the close" patterns, especially around issuer events like IPOs where Euronext closes influence external pricing
Enhance 5% threshold monitoring with automated alerts and timely filings (4 trading days post-threshold)
Conduct senior manager training on personal liability under MAR for manipulative orders benefiting the firm (e
Review cross-border trading policies for French-listed assets, including jurisdiction assessments for non-EU funds
Perform gap analysis on order timing controls to flag end-of-day volume spikes
Key Dates
October 10-16, 2019- Five trading sessions during which manipulative "marking the close" sales occurred on Euronext Paris.
2019 (exact dates unspecified)- Instances of failing to report exceeding/falling below 5% ownership thresholds in Innate Pharma.
13 December 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines.
16 December 2024- French version of press release published.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to AMF's aggressive fines (€10M total) and personal accountability for a US fund/director, signaling heightened cross-border enforcement on Euronext trades. Firms should prioritize surveillance upgrades now, as appeals are possible but do not suspend implications; low i
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2024 accounts: The AMF publishes recommendations and the results of its examinations of financial statements
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee imposes fines totalling €4,150,000 on four legal entities and three natural persons for disseminating false or misleading information, and price manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines totaling €4,150,000 on December 11, 2024, against Auplata (an issuer), its former CEO Didier Tamagno, statutory auditors RSM Paris and Stéphane Marie (€50,000-€300,000 range), and fund entities European High Growth Opportunities Manco SA, Alpha Blue Ocean Inc., and director Pierre Vannineuse (€1,000,000-€1,500,000 range) for disseminating false or misleading information in press releases and financial statements, plus share price manipulation via unauthorized sales. This decision underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under French financial regulations, serving as a critical reminder for issuers, auditors, and investment managers to ensure transparent disclosure of financing terms and compliance with share disposal commitments, with appeals already lodged at the Paris Court of Appeal.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing obligations under AMF rules prohibiting false/misleading information (e.g., omitting key clauses in financing agreements like ODIRNANEs with BSAs, failing to disclose earn-outs or include them in going concern analyses) and price manipulation (e.g., breaching share retention and daily sales volume limits). No new requirements were introduced, but the decision clarifies interpretive application: auditors face liability
What You Need To Do
Review disclosure practices
Enhance auditor coordination
Strengthen trading controls
Training and policies
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
11 December 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines.
Post-11 December 2024- Appeals lodged by European High Growth Opportunities Manco SA, Alpha Blue Ocean Inc., Auplata Mining Group AMG, RSM Paris SAS, Stéphane Marie, and Pierre Vannineuse before the Paris Court of Appeal (exact filing date not specified).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Matters due to substantial fines (up to €1.5M per entity), personal liability for executives/auditors, and broad applicability to disclosure/manipulation risks in equity financings; recent timing (2024 decision, ongoing appeals) signals AMF's active enforcement focus, prompting immed
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Listed companies and issuers Faced with dense and complex information, the AMF is encouraging financial institutions to continue their efforts to improve the transparency of their Taxonomy reporting
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Regulatory developments The Listing Act is entering into force on December 4, 2024
ETF Equity MIFID Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers ETFs win over newcomers as they invest into the stock market
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Publication of the first CSRD sustainability statements: AMF draws issuers’ attention to ESMA's 2024 recommendations
Cooperation Markets Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the AMMC are strengthening their...
Supervision Asset management MMF AIFMD Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of a new series of SPOT inspections on the quality of regulatory reporting data
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures ESMA’s communications to support the implementation and supervision of corporate sustainability reporting
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate Sustainability Reporting directive (CSRD): EFRAG and the European Commission publish implementation guidance and FAQs
AI Analysis
The AMF publication announces implementation guidance and FAQs on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) released by EFRAG and the European Commission, aimed at clarifying reporting standards under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). This matters for compliance professionals as it provides actionable tools to meet expanded sustainability disclosure requirements, ensuring audit-ready reporting amid phased rollouts and third-party assurance mandates. It supports harmonized EU-wide compliance for nearly 50,000 companies, enhancing data comparability and investor transparency.
#
What Changed
EFRAG and the European Commission have published specific implementation guidance and FAQs to operationalize CSRD reporting using ESRS, focusing on double materiality assessments, climate disclosures (including Scope 1-3 GHG emissions), and Paris Agreement-aligned transition plans starting in 2025.
CSRD replaces the NFRD with broader scope (quadrupling affected companies to ~50,000), mandatory digital tagging (ESEF/XBRL), limited third-party assurance (phasing to reasonable), and integrated sust
What You Need To Do
Review EFRAG/EC guidance and FAQs for ESRS implementation; conduct double materiality assessment to identify material ESG topics
Map and collect ESG data (GHG emissions Scope 1-3, value-chain impacts) with audit trails; develop Paris-aligned transition plans
Integrate sustainability into management reports with digital tagging (XBRL/ESEF); secure limited third-party assurance
Strengthen data governance, test processes, and monitor updates from EFRAG/EC/AMF
Key Dates
2025- First wave (NFRD reporters: large listed/public interest entities >500 employees) publish CSRD reports for FY2024.
2026- Large EU companies (previously planned for FY2025) deferred to 2028 for FY2027 reporting.
2028- Listed SMEs report for FY2026 (deferred from 2027).
2029- Final wave including certain non-EU firms; CSDDD applies from July 26, 2029.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - With first reports due in 2025 for ~11,000 firms and preparations critical for 2026+ waves, non-compliance risks enforcement, reputational damage, and investor scrutiny. Deferred timelines offer breathing room but demand immediate data readiness amid evolving standards and assurance
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Sogenial Immobilier and its chairman a total of €180,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued a €180,000 combined fine against Sogenial Immobilier (€150,000) and its chairman Jean-Marie Souclier (€30,000) on September 12, 2024, for systematic breaches of professional obligations spanning investment selection, regulatory disclosure, conflict of interest management, and anti-money laundering compliance. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's heightened scrutiny of asset managers' operational controls and substantive compliance with fund governance requirements, particularly regarding real estate investment companies (SCPIs).
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement expectations across existing obligations:
Regulatory Documentation Standards: Asset managers must implement documented procedures governing the preparation of all regulatory and marketing materials for alternative investment funds, with particular attention to accurate risk disclosure and asset return reporting.
Investment Due Diligence Standards: A "high standard of diligence" is required when selecti
What You Need To Do
*Audit Existing Procedures
*Formalize Investment Selection Process
*Enhance Conflict of Interest Controls
*Implement Comprehensive AML/CFT
*Strengthen Internal Control Functions
Key Dates
September 12, 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee issued the decision
September 16, 2024- Public announcement of sanctions
No specified deadline- Appeal period remains open (appeals may be lodged against the decision)
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines Biosynex, its CEO and several of its directors a total of €930,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined Biosynex and four directors (plus their holding companies) a total of €930,000 on 25 July 2024 for breaches including selective disclosure of inside information via a CEO interview, insider trading by selling shares on non-public knowledge of a treasury share sale, and failures to report share transactions to the AMF. This matters as it reinforces AMF's strict enforcement of MAR (Market Abuse Regulation) rules on information dissemination, insider dealing, and PDMR reporting, serving as a precedent for listed companies and executives during high-volatility periods like COVID-19. Appeals by some parties were dismissed as inadmissible by the Paris Court of Appeal on 9 January 2025.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it applies existing requirements under EU MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014, transposed in France) and AMF rules:
Selective disclosure: Issuers must ensure "full and effective" public dissemination of inside information via press releases before any selective sharing (e.g., interviews); partial disclosure to a "restricted audience" (like journalists) without prior release violates this.
Insider trading: Prohibits trading (including selling
What You Need To Do
Implement pre-approval for executive media interactions: Require scripts/press releases issued simultaneously with interviews to avoid selective disclosure
Enhance insider lists and trading controls
Automate transaction reporting
Conduct MAR training refreshers
Audit past disclosures
Key Dates
25 July 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issuing fines.
March-April 2020- Violation period (interview on 20 March 2020; share sales and unreported transactions).
9 January 2025- Paris Court of Appeal dismisses appeals by CEO Abensur, CFO Fraenckel, and ALA Financière as inadmissible (case n° 24/16188).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not a new rule but a high-profile enforcement (€930k total: Biosynex €50k; CEO/holding €460k; others €70k-€230k each) highlighting personal liability for executives, with appeals failing. Matters for listed firms as it stresses "full/effective" dissemination and rejects operational
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Professional investors The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an issuer and two of its former directors at the time of the facts for market manipulation by disseminating false or misleading information. It also fined one of the directors for insider...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on an issuer and two former directors for market manipulation via dissemination of false or misleading information, with an additional fine on one director for insider trading violations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), serving as a stark reminder of personal and corporate liability for disclosure failures and privileged information misuse. Compliance teams must prioritize robust controls to mitigate similar risks, as such violations erode market integrity and investor trust.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, so there are no direct regulatory changes. It reinforces existing obligations under Book VI of the AMF General Regulation on market abuse, including insider dealing and market manipulation, aligned with Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (MAR). Key principles upheld include prohibitions on disseminating false/misleading information that impacts security prices and trading on inside information, with no novel requirements but heightened emphas
What You Need To Do
Implement or strengthen disclosure controls to ensure all public information is accurate and non-misleading, with pre-approval for promotional materials submitted to AMF
Enhance insider lists and training for directors on MAR prohibitions, including trading blackouts before announcements
Deploy surveillance systems to detect market manipulation signals, with compliance officers mandated to report suspicious transactions to AMF
Conduct due diligence attestations for prospectuses/public offers, confirming no material omissions
Review governance for personal liability, including cooperation incentives in investigations per proposed AMF powers
Key Dates
30 June 2026- End of MiCA transitional period; AMF to fully enforce crypto-asset market abuse under MAR-equivalent rules.
30 June 2026- AMF General Regulation updates effective, enhancing MAR reporting procedures (e.g., Articles 145-1 to 145-4).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This demonstrates AMF's aggressive stance on market abuse amid rising "insider networks" and organized crime threats, with fines signaling personal risk for directors. It matters because enforcement is intensifying (e.g., web scraping for investigations, expanded sanctions like 10-ye
MIFID Fixed income The AMF proposes a methodology for calibrating the thresholds determining the transparency regime applicable to corporate bond transactions.
Asset management Notification forms for the cross-border exercise of the activities of passemanagement companies, and the marketing of UCITS and AIFs: the AMF updates its doctrine
Sustainable Finance Asset management Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) publishes the findings of three supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance
Sustainable Finance Governance Financing the economy Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the ACPR have published their report on the monitoring and assessment of the climate...
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment has published its 2023 Annual Report
Sustainable Finance Investment advice Long term investment Retail investors Journalists Mystery shopping visits to bank branches: the collection of client sustainability preferences remains fragmented
Asset management MMF AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on updating the stress scenario parameters provided for in Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation for 2024
Asset management Sustainable Finance Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law (29LEC): the French Treasury published FAQs in April 2024
AI Analysis
The AMF publication highlights FAQs issued by the French Treasury in April 2024, clarifying key aspects of Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law (29LEC) reporting obligations for French financial institutions on sustainability integration in investment activities. This matters for compliance teams as it addresses practical ambiguities in scope, consolidation, and EU interactions post-2023 reporting cycles, reducing interpretive risks amid expanding ESG mandates like SFDR. Firms must review these to ensure accurate 2024+ submissions via the Climate Transparency Hub (CTH).
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; the FAQs provide interpretive guidance on existing 29LEC requirements from the Energy and Climate Law (8 November 2019) and implementing Decree (29 May 2021). Clarifications cover:
Scope of application: Defines entities required to report on ESG integration (e.g., portfolio asset management companies, ISPs).
Consolidation rules: How to aggregate data across group entities.
Interactions with EU rules: Alignment with SFDR, including narrative reports and s
What You Need To Do
Read and implement French Treasury FAQs
Update 29LEC reports
Integrate clarifications
Monitor CTH
Key Dates
April 2024- French Treasury publishes 29LEC FAQs following 2023 reporting round.
2023 financial year- Deadline for 2024 submissions of narrative reports (CTH) and standardized annexes (ACPR/AMF); analysis published in 2024.DEADLINE
Annual ongoing- Yearly reporting cycle for 29LEC, with 2024 remittances analyzed for 2023 FY; no new deadlines specified in FAQs.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not critical as FAQs clarify existing rules without new mandates, but high relevance for 2024/2025 cycles to avoid supervisory scrutiny from AMF/ACPR amid thematic inspections on asset manager governance. Matters due to rising ESG enforcement, SFDR synergies, and public transparenc
Long term investment Equity ETF Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Dashboard of retail investors active on the stock market: sharp increase in retail ETF activity in Q1 2024
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Equity Journalists Listed companies and issuers Amendment to the AMF General Regulation makes "retail" tranche optional for initial public offerings
Asset management Europe & international Journalists Investment management companies Austrian, French, Italian and Spanish financial market authorities give their key priorities for a macro-prudential approach to asset management
Professional certification AMF activity Journalists The Autorité des Marchés Financiers announces the new composition of the Financial Skills Certification Board
Sustainable Finance Financial products Asset management Europe & international Regulatory developments The AMF publishes, in a position paper, the key principles it believes should guide the SFDR review
Europe & international Periodic & ongoing disclosures The European single access point for financial and non-financial information on European entities (ESAP) enters its implementation phase
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Listed companies and issuers AMF publishes an educational guide on companies’ climate transition plans prepared by its Climate and Sustainable Finance Commission
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines seven people, four for price manipulation and three for failing to comply with reporting obligations
Sanctions & settlements Disclosure Obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a former manager of a listed company for failing to disclose inside information as soon as possible and for failing to disclose major shareholdings
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a fine on a former manager of a listed company for two violations: failing to disclose inside information to the public as soon as possible under Article 17 of the EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), and failing to disclose major shareholdings as required by French regulations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of market abuse rules, emphasizing personal accountability for executives in ensuring timely transparency to prevent insider trading risks and maintain market integrity. Compliance teams should review it as a reminder of heightened scrutiny on disclosure delays and threshold crossings.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement decision reinforcing existing obligations under MAR and AMF General Regulation:
Inside information disclosure: Issuers must publicly disclose inside information "as soon as possible" per Article 17 MAR, unless specific delay conditions are met (legitimate interest, confidentiality ensured, no public misleading). Delays require post-publication notification to AMF at differepublication@amf-france.org.
Major shareholdings disclosure: Persons cross
What You Need To Do
Assess information promptly
Declare major shareholdings immediately upon threshold crossing to issuer/AMF; ensure custodians comply with identity disclosure requests
Use professional information providers for dissemination to ensure wide, secure EU reach; archive on company website
Train executives on insider lists, transaction reporting (within 3 days if >€20k/year), and penalties (up to €100m fines, criminal sanctions)
Key Dates
3 trading days- Managers/PDMRs must report securities transactions to issuer and AMF if annual total exceeds €20,000.DEADLINE
10 business days- Custodians must respond to Euroclear France/AMF requests for shareholder identity on threshold crossings.DEADLINE
effective 2016) and AMF GR.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to personal fines on managers, signaling AMF's aggressive enforcement of MAR since 2016, with rebuttable presumptions against executives for insider misconduct unless proven otherwise. Firms face reputational risk, investigations, and cascading liabilities (e.g., €10
Long term investment Collective investments Shares Retail investors Journalists Equity investment: intentions on the rise again, driven by young people
Asset management UCIT Collective investments The AMF updates its policy on disclosures by collective investment schemes incorporating non-financial methods
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Visiomed and its former directors, Éric Sebban and Olivier Hua, for market manipulation. It also fines Negma Group Ltd for breach of its reporting obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on Visiomed and its former directors Éric Sebban and Olivier Hua for market manipulation, and on Negma Group Ltd for failing to meet reporting obligations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous enforcement of market abuse rules under EU Regulation 596/2014 (MAR), serving as a critical reminder for listed companies, directors, and major shareholders to prioritize compliance with manipulation prohibitions and threshold crossing disclosures. It matters because it demonstrates personal liability for executives and ongoing scrutiny of disclosure failures, potentially influencing enforcement trends in 2026 amid strengthened AMF powers.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new regulatory changes, reinforcing existing requirements under MAR (Regulation (EU) No 596/2014), transposed into AMF's General Regulation (Book VI on market abuse). It highlights prohibitions on market manipulation (e.g., disseminating false or misleading information or engaging in fictitious transactions to influence prices) and mandatory reporting of shareholdings crossing 5% thresholds or changes therein for listed issuers. No novel rules are intr
What You Need To Do
Conduct internal audits
Enhance monitoring systems
Train personnel
Update policies
Cooperate with regulators
Key Dates
Immediate- Report suspicious transactions (insider dealing or manipulation) to AMF without delay.
30 June 2026- End of MiCA transitional period, with AMF focusing on crypto-asset market abuse alignment (indirect relevance via MAR enforcement).
30 June 2026- AMF General Regulation updates effective, enhancing MAR-related reporting procedures (e.g., Title V on failings reporting).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This action signals intensified personal accountability for executives in market manipulation cases, amid AMF's 2026 focus on market integrity and new tools like expanded data access and injunctions with penalty payments. Firms must act swiftly to fortify controls, as non-compliance
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes a second educational report on taxonomy reporting by listed companies
Long term investment Equity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers An OECD study for the AMF profiles new French retail investors
Cooperation Fintech Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the US...
Fees Savings protection Other professionals Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers The AMF ensures that retail investors are properly informed on fees of financial products
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Rallye and its chief executive officer, Franck Hattab, for market manipulation
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned listed company Rallye and its former CEO Franck Hattab for market manipulation via dissemination of false or misleading information about Rallye's liquidity position on 11 occasions across 14 communications from March 2018 to May 2019, in violation of Articles 12.1(c), 12.4, and 15 of the EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). Rallye was fined €25 million and Hattab €1 million due to the repetition of breaches, prior AMF warnings, and potential investor harm from artificially inflated share prices. This case matters as it demonstrates AMF's aggressive enforcement of MAR disclosure rules, holding both issuers and senior executives personally liable for financial communications that misrepresent key risks like liquidity.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing MAR requirements prohibiting dissemination of false or misleading information likely to artificially affect financial instrument prices. Key interpretations include: (i) describing liquidity as "solid" or "very solid" despite dependency on volatile subsidiary (Casino) shares and hidden risks (e.g., €400-600M liquidity shortfall, concealed loans) constitutes manipulation; (ii) issuers are strictly responsible for com
What You Need To Do
Review historical/current financial communications for liquidity/debt portrayals; ensure they explicitly address dependencies (e
Enhance governance
Audit trails
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
March 8, 2018 - May 15, 2019- Period of infringing communications (11 occasions, 14 media).
2016- Prior AMF Deputy Secretary General warning to Rallye on financial communication quality, specifically liquidity risk presentation.
September 2023(inferred from context) - AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines.
September 18-19, 2023- Rallye appeals the AMF decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Reinforces personal accountability for executives in debt-heavy listed firms, with fines scaled to repetition and centrality of misrepresented risks (liquidity as Rallye's primary exposure). Matters amid ongoing Casino restructuring (€6.4B debt), signaling AMF scrutiny of retail sect
MiCA Crypto-assets Regulatory developments Digital assets: the AMF amends its General Regulation and its policy on DASP in light of enhanced registration and the MiCA Regulation
Collective investments Asset management The AMF updates its policy on the information to be provided by collective investment schemes incorporating non-financial approaches
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Regulatory developments The AMF responds to the European Commission’s public consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's response to the European Commission's public consultation advocates for simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, emphasizing retained quality in climate reporting, interoperability with ISSB standards, and proportionality while opposing overly complex materiality assessments. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming ESRS revisions that could reduce reporting burdens but maintain investor-focused disclosures, influencing 2026-2028 sustainability statements for listed firms and financial institutions. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-responds-european-commissions-public-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting
#
What Changed
Simplified ESRS Structure: EFRAG's draft reduces mandatory datapoints by 57-71% and ESRS length by 55%, focusing on materiality, fair presentation, and quantitative data while streamlining double materiality assessments and eliminating sector-specific standards. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.iss-corporate.com/resources/blog/eu-sustainability-rules-reset-what-the-2026-
What You Need To Do
Review and refresh double materiality assessments using "gross" impacts, specifying risks/opportunities per topic
Retain "net-zero" definitions in climate plans if used; prepare quantitative climate financial effects data (Option 1)
Evaluate "undue costs" reliefs for non-climate metrics, documenting with time-bound justifications
Monitor EFRAG/EC updates post-November 2025; test voluntary simplified ESRS in 2026 cycles
Align with ESMA 2025 priorities (e
Key Dates
July 31, 2025EFRAG submits simplified ESRS draft for consultation. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
September 29, 2025EFRAG consultation closes. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
End of November 2025EFRAG presents technical advice to European Commission. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
2026 Financial Year (reports in 2027)Voluntary use of simplified standards possible if legislative timeline allows. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/depth/csrd-sustainability-reporting
2027 (reports in 2028)Full mandatory application targeted. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Revisions offer relief (e.g., 57%+ datapoint cuts) but require proactive preparation for voluntary 2026 use and mandatory 2027/2028; critical for 2025 reporters under current ESRS/"quick fix" to avoid enforcement. Matters due to AMF/ESMA supervision ramp-up, investor demands for co
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Financial products Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment publishes its 2022 annual report
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment services providers By two decisions, the AMF Enforcement Committee fines two investment services providers for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued two decisions on 19 June 2023 fining Crédit Industriel et Commercial (€1 million) and Banque CIC Sud-Ouest (€250,000) for breaches of professional obligations in investment advisory services, including inadequate suitability assessments, client classification procedures, marketing of unsuitable instruments, and insufficient controls on costs and fees. This matters because it underscores AMF's strict enforcement of MiFID II-derived obligations, signaling heightened scrutiny on operational systems for client protection and potential for substantial fines based on breach duration and scale.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new legislation, but it reinforces existing regulatory requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code and MiFID II transposition:
Obligation to implement an effective operational system for assessing investment suitability in advisory services.
Requirement for compliant client classification procedures aligned with regulations.
Duty to market only financial instruments suited to client profiles.
Mandate for effective control systems over investmen
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of investment advisory processes against AMF expectations for suitability assessments, client classification, product matching, and control systems
Enhance traceability and documentation of suitability checks, client categorizations, and cost disclosures to demonstrate operational effectiveness
Review and strengthen internal procedures for marketing instruments, ensuring alignment with client profiles and regulatory marketing authorizations (cross-reference to similar past cases)
Implement or audit remedial measures, as considered in fine calculations, including staff training on professional obligations
Test controls for providing clear cost information to clients, avoiding misleading disclosures
Key Dates
19 June 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decisions issued, imposing fines and warnings.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose multimillion-euro fines for systemic operational failures in core client protection areas, with penalties scaled by breach duration, number, and seriousness; firms with advisory services face elevated risk of audits or enforcement if controls
Financial services providers Asset management Marketing European Crowdfunding Services Providers: the AMF publishes a position on marketing communications
Supervision Asset management Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary on the internal processes that aim to ensure compliance with non-financial contractual commitments by asset management companies of ESG/SRI funds
Asset management Sustainable Finance Organisational rules Reporting under Article 29 of the Energy-Climate Law: the AMF updates its policy on how to prepare and submit reports
Savings protection Equity Savings Plan Shares Long term investment Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Listed companies and issuers Equity savings plans : the AMF working group proposes avenues for...
Supervision MIFID Financial services providers Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Provision of market data: the AMF conducts a series of SPOT inspections and identifies shortcomings in compliance with requirements
Financial disclosures & corporate financing The AMF makes available to listed companies the English version of its recommendations and the results of its examination work of the financial statements
MMF Asset management Regulatory developments The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation for 2023
Collective investments Shares The AMF presents its proposals to improve the readability of financial product fees in European law
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, France's financial markets authority) has proposed a new table for presenting subscription fees on financial instruments and an accompanying glossary to enhance investor readability and comparability, developed in collaboration with the Financial Sector Consultative Committee (FSCC) as input to the European Commission's Retail Investment Strategy. This matters because it targets reconciling MiFID 2 and PRIIPs disclosure requirements, which currently hinder clear fee communication, potentially influencing future EU-level amendments to improve retail investor protection without imposing new obligations.
#
What Changed
Alternative Fee Presentation Table: A proposed redesigned table for displaying costs associated with subscribing to financial instruments, emphasizing investor understanding rather than adding a new document; this requires evolving MiFID 2 regulations as current MiFID 2 and PRIIPs rules are incompatible for such clarity.
Glossary of Terms: A harmonized glossary defining key fee types, tested with non-professional investors using AMF consumer testing tools, to standardize terminology across profe
What You Need To Do
Monitor and Respond
Internal Review
Testing and Training
No immediate obligations, as this is a non-binding proposal requiring EU law changes
Key Dates
2026**.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is a consultative proposal without firm deadlines or binding rules, but it signals likely EU-level shifts in fee disclosure under MiFID 2/PRIIPs, impacting retail investor-facing firms. It matters for proactive compliance, as early adoption of clearer formats could mitigate fu
Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the AMF publishes a study on classifications and fossil fuel exposure in the French funds universe
Employee savings scheme Long term investment Collective investments Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Employee savings: a sharp increase in awareness and ownership of employee savings schemes; support for employees and company managers...
Sustainable Finance Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Shareholder dialogue on environmental and climate issues
MIFID Supervision Retail investors Journalists Mystery shopping campaign to bank branches: progress made in the questioning to client, improvements needed in the information provided
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Financial products Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF calls on listed companies to improve investor information regarding the risks incurred in the case of dilutive financing transactions
Savings protection Marketing Marketing of financial products to ageing populations: publication of an independent academic research report on customer relations and sales processes
Long term investment Equity Equity Savings Plan Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Over 1.5 million retail investors bought or sold shares in...
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines the British company H2O AM LLP and two of its executives at the time of the facts for several breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined UK asset manager H2O AM LLP €75 million and its executives Bruno Crastes (€15 million, plus a 5-year ban) and Vincent Chailley (€3 million) for breaches in managing French UCITS funds, including ineligible Tennor Group investments, liquidity risks, valuation failures, and non-compliance with investment ratios and counterparty limits. This matters as it underscores AMF's strict enforcement on UCITS eligibility, risk management, and prospectus adherence, with cross-border implications confirmed by the Conseil d'État's dismissal of appeals on 13 June 2025. It signals heightened scrutiny on illiquid, unrated assets and "buy & sell back" transactions for EU asset managers.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not new rules, but it reinforces existing UCITS requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code and AMF regulations:
UCITS investments must exclude illiquid, unrated securities outside prospectus scopes; liquidity risks must be properly assessed to ensure redemption capabilities.
Debt holdings per issuer capped at 10%; counterparty exposure (e.g., 5% limit) must include all relevant transactions like buy & sell backs.
Reliable valuation information required
What You Need To Do
Review portfolios
Enhance due diligence
Strengthen governance
Depositary checks
Training/remediation
Key Dates
30 December 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision SAN-2023-01 imposing fines and sanctions.
7 August 2023- Conseil d'État rejects preliminary constitutionality question.
13 June 2025- Conseil d'État dismisses appeals (n. 471548, 471744), upholding sanctions and ordering €3,000 costs to AMF.
June 2025.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Finalized enforcement (June 2025) with massive fines (€93M total) and bans demonstrates AMF's willingness to pursue personal/executive liability for UCITS breaches, especially cross-border. Matters for firms with illiquid strategies, as it amplifies post-2020 liquidity crisis lessons
Long term investment Shares Collective investments Retail investors Journalists The AMF’s latest savings barometer finds that the French are a little less inclined to invest in the stock market
Governance Sustainable Finance Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Social and environmental responsibility, the focus of the AMF's 2022 report on corporate governance and executive compensation of listed companies
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes two analyses of the information provided by listed companies under Taxonomy reporting and concerning the effects of...
Markets Financial disclosures & corporate financing The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has requested the resumption of listing of ORPEA’s securities today
Markets Periodic & ongoing disclosures The AMF has requested the suspension of ORPEA's financial instruments
AI Analysis
On October 24, 2022, France's Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) suspended all financial instruments (shares, debt securities, and related instruments) issued by ORPEA S.A., a major European care homes operator, pending disclosure of material information under the European Market Abuse Regulation. This enforcement action reflects serious governance and disclosure failures at a publicly listed company facing allegations of operational malpractice and undisclosed financial difficulties.
What Changed
The AMF's suspension order represents a temporary halt to all trading in ORPEA's financial instruments across regulated markets. This is a precautionary measure under Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) protocols designed to protect market integrity when material non-public information exists. The suspension was lifted on October 26, 2022, upon market opening, following ORPEA's disclosure of an amicable conciliation procedure and anticipated asset impairments.
The underlying trigger was ORPEA's failu
What You Need To Do
*For ORPEA (and comparable listed companies)
*Immediate disclosure obligations
*Ongoing periodic updates
*Governance remediation
*Creditor communication
Key Dates
October 24, 2022- AMF requests suspension of ORPEA's financial instruments before market opening
October 26, 2022- Trading resumes upon market opening following ORPEA's disclosure of conciliation procedure and financial restructuring plan
November 8, 2022- Q3 2022 revenue announcement (after market close)
November 15, 2022- ORPEA to present detailed transformation plan to market
December 31, 2022- Anticipated asset impairment recognition date
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Financial products Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes a study on the share price performance of companies using dilutive...
Governance Europe & international The AMF encourages French participants to provide feedback to ESMA’s call for evidence on the implementation of the Shareholders Rights Directive (SRD 2)
AI Analysis
The AMF publication urges French market participants to submit feedback to ESMA's call for evidence evaluating the implementation of the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II), which aims to enhance long-term shareholder engagement, transparency in voting processes, and issuer-shareholder dialogue across the EU/EEA. This matters for compliance teams as it signals ongoing regulatory scrutiny of SRD II transposition and operational compliance, potentially leading to harmonized amendments that could require process updates in shareholder identification, voting transmission, and engagement disclosures. French firms' input can influence future EU rules, mitigating risks of non-compliance with evolving standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes participation in ESMA's review of SRD II (Directive (EU) 2017/828), implemented via national laws by June 2019 and effective from September 3, 2020. SRD II's core requirements include: shareholder identification without delay, electronic/machine-readable transmission of voting and meeting information along the intermediary chain, confirmation of vote recording/counting, transparency on institutional investor and asset manag
What You Need To Do
Submit feedback to ESMA
Review current compliance
Enhance processes if needed
Monitor ESMA/EC outputs
Key Dates
June 10, 2019- EU Member States' transposition deadline for SRD II into national law (e.g., France via law of May 22, 2019).DEADLINE
September 3, 2020- SRD II go-live date for operational requirements like shareholder identification and voting processes.
October 3, 2022- European Commission request to ESMA/EBA for SRD II input, contextualizing ESMA's ongoing review.
of 2026.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - SRD II has been live since 2020, so core compliance is established, but ESMA's review could trigger targeted amendments (e.g., operational standardization), especially for French intermediaries handling cross-border flows. This matters for avoiding supervisory findings in ongoing A
Equity Savings Plan Long term investment Savings protection Retail investors Journalists The AMF creates a working group on equity savings plans (PEAs)
Supervision Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on simple, transparent and standardised securitisation
MIFID Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainability requirements in the distribution of financial instruments: update on upcoming legislation and its implementation dates
MMF Asset management The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation
Asset management Savings protection Journalists The AMF is conducting a consultation on the end of life of private equity funds intended for retail investors
AI Analysis
The AMF is conducting a consultation on regulatory reforms governing the end-of-life management of retail private equity funds (FCPRs, FCPIs, and FIPs), with the objective of improving compliance with liquidation deadlines and enhancing investor protection through better information disclosure and operational safeguards. This initiative addresses systemic issues where fund managers have historically failed to respect contractual lifespan commitments, creating liquidity risks and investor communication failures.
What Changed
The AMF has amended its General Regulation and policy framework to implement several substantive requirements:
*Liquidation Compliance & Warnings**
A new Article 422-120-14-1 requires management companies to include a warning in promotional materials if, over the ten years preceding fund authorization, the company failed to respect the lifespan of at least 50% of retail or professional private equity funds under its management. This warning applies only when two materiality thresholds are met:
What You Need To Do
*For All Retail Private Equity Fund Managers
*Audit historical compliance with fund lifespan commitments over the preceding ten years to determine if warning requirements under Article 422-120-14-1 apply
*Implement bank details collection for all funds established after December 5, 2024, incorporating requirements into subscription forms per Instruction DOC-2011-22
*Establish prior notification procedures for substantial changes to fund structure, investment strategy, or operations, with one-month advance notice to the AMF
*Update Position-Recommendation DOC-2012-11 compliance to reflect the extended 15-year lock-up period for newly authorized funds
Key Dates
December 5, 2024- Effective date for new Article 422-120-16 (bank details collection requirement for newly established funds)
November 12, 2024- AMF decision approving amendments to General Regulation
December 5, 2024- Publication in Official Journal of the French Republic
June 13, 2024- Enactment of Attractiveness Law No. 2024-537 (establishing 15-year maximum lock-up period)
January 10, 2024- Revised ELTIF Regulation came into application
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the International Sustainability Standards Board’s consultation on the exposure drafts on international sustainability disclosures
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, issued a position paper on July 27, 2022, responding to the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) consultation on exposure drafts for international sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2). This matters for compliance professionals as it signals France's push for global-EU interoperability in ESG reporting, influencing how firms align ISSB "investor-focused" standards with Europe's double-materiality CSRD/ESRS framework to avoid dual reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/amfs-eu-positions/amf-response-issb-consultation-exposure-drafts-sustainability-disclosure-standards; https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/Position%20paper%20ISSB%20AMF%20-%20July%202022_0.pdf
#
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but AMF's recommendations to ISSB, emphasizing:
Interoperability with EU standards: AMF urges alignment between ISSB's financial materiality approach and EFRAG's double-materiality (impact + financial) ESRS, including jurisdictional working groups for compatibility.
Broad ESG coverage: Calls for sector-agnostic standards beyond climate (e.g., full ESG spectrum via collaboration with EFRAG/GRI).
Phased implementation: Suggests gradual rollout of detailed requirements
What You Need To Do
Monitor and map standards
Engage in transitions
Enhance reporting processes
Stakeholder dialogue
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This 2022 AMF response is historical but highly relevant amid 2025 EFRAG simplifications emphasizing ISSB interoperability, as EU firms juggle CSRD with global ISSB momentum (e.g., IFRS finals in 2023). Matters for avoiding reporting fragmentation, with risks of supervisory scrutiny
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the EFRAG consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's position paper responds to EFRAG's 2022 public consultation on the first set of draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming their ambition on ESG topics and double materiality while urging proportionality, international interoperability, materiality focus, and alignment with EU laws like SFDR. This matters for compliance professionals as it shapes final ESRS, influencing mandatory sustainability disclosures for EU firms and financial market participants from 2024 onward, with potential simplifications affecting reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amfs-response-efrag-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting-standards
#
What Changed
This is a consultation response, not a final rule, but AMF highlights these priorities for ESRS development:
International interoperability: Convergence with ISSB standards to avoid duplication and meet investor needs across jurisdictions. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
Proportionality in disclosures: Gradual implementation, prioritizing climate standards, balancing stakeho
What You Need To Do
Monitor ESRS evolution
Enhance materiality processes
Align reporting systems
Engage stakeholders
Pilot disclosures
Key Dates
July 2022- AMF submits response to EFRAG consultation on draft ESRS. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2024- First CSRD application for FY 2024 reports (large public-interest entities). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2025- ESRS adoption by European Commission (first set covering SFDR needs). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
TBD (post-2025)- EC Delegated Act on simplified ESRS, subject to 2-month EU Parliament/Council scrutiny. https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-provides-its-technical-advice-on-draft-simplified-esrs-to-the-european-commission
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Historical (2022) input shapes binding ESRS already applying in 2024/2025, but ongoing simplifications (e.g., 2025 EC advice) offer relief on burdens; critical for FY2026+ prep amid interoperability push, yet not immediate mandates. Matters for reducing overload, ensuring SFDR comp
Sanctions & settlements Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a depositary for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined RBC Investor Services Bank France SA (RBC ISBF) €500,000 plus a warning on 20 July 2022 (published 08 January 2026) for breaches as a UCITS and AIF depositary, including 25 confirmed failures in tiered intervention procedures for investment ratio overruns and deficient monitoring of 14 questionable cash flows over 45 months. This decision underscores AMF's strict enforcement of depositary duties under French regulations implementing UCITS/AIFMD, emphasizing robust controls for ratio compliance, cash flow verification, and documentation. It matters for compliance teams as it provides precedent on what constitutes "irregular and deficient" oversight, potentially increasing scrutiny and fines for similar lapses in depositary functions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing depositary obligations under French UCITS/AIFMD rules (e.g., Articles L. 214-7 et seq. Monetary and Financial Code):
Ratio monitoring and intervention: Depositaries must implement tiered procedures for investment/asset composition ratio breaches (e.g., diversification limits); 25 of 28 alleged anomalies were upheld due to redundant but confirmed procedural failures.
Cash flow oversight: Must identify
What You Need To Do
Review depositary controls
Enhance cash flow monitoring
Conduct gap analysis
Update policies/procedures
Appeal if applicable
Key Dates
20 July 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing €500,000 fine and warning on RBC ISBF.
08 January 2026- Public news release/publication date of the decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Recent publication (08 January 2026) signals ongoing AMF focus on depositary failings amid H2O-related probes, but stems from 2022 events with no immediate deadlines. Matters because it sets precedents for fine quantum (€500k) on procedural lapses, reinforces liability for cash/rat
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines one natural person and five legal entities, including a management company, for failing to comply with several reporting obligations in relation to a concerted action carried out in the context of a takeover bid and, in the case of the...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on one natural person and five legal entities, including an investment management company, for failing to comply with multiple reporting obligations related to a concerted action during a partial takeover bid.[User Query]. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of transparency rules in takeover scenarios, serving as a critical reminder for market participants to adhere to disclosure timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and reputational damage.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision highlighting existing obligations under French financial markets law, particularly those governing concerted actions (actions concertées) and reporting in takeover bids. Key requirements reinforced include:
Timely disclosure of positions and intentions when parties act in concert, as per AMF regulations on major holdings and takeover bids (e.g., Article L. 233-10 of the French Commercial Code and AMF General Regulatio
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance internal procedures for monitoring share positions, identifying concerted actions, and automating AMF filings
Train front-office and compliance teams on takeover bid disclosures, including documentation of coordination (e
Implement pre-trade alerts for threshold breaches and conduct periodic audits of historical filings
For management companies
Key Dates
Within 4 trading days- Declaration of crossing major holding thresholds or intent to continue acquisitions (AMF Form DOC-2005-01).
Immediate (same day)- Notification of concerted action agreements in takeover contexts.
Within 10 trading days- Detailed position reports post-crossing.
in 2025(e.g., 16 July 2025 for inside information breaches).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to the AMF Enforcement Committee's pattern of fining reporting failures (e.g., €1.89M in July 2025 for late disclosures, €1.7M in June 2025 for shareholder breaches), signaling intensified scrutiny on M&A transparency amid volatile markets. Non-compliance risks fines
Derivatives or structured products Journalists The AMF has published a study of the profile of participants and their positions in the Matif agricultural commodities derivatives market
Supervision MIFID Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on the theme of best execution in asset management companies
Innovation AMF activity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF continues its data strategy with the release of short selling data to the public
Annual report Savings protection Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment publishes its 2021 annual report
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF reiterates its call for a European regulation of ESG data, ratings, and related services
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its findings regarding the costs and fees of UCITS marketed to retail investors
Supervision Fixed income Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on post-trade transparency in the bond market
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a biotech company for failing to disclose inside information as soon as possible, and one of its co-founders and one of its shareholders for unlawful disclosure or use of inside information
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned a biotech company for delaying disclosure of inside information, and fined a co-founder and shareholder for unlawfully disclosing or using it, violating EU Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) obligations under Articles 7, 10, and 17. This case underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of timely public disclosure and insider handling, highlighting risks of personal liability for executives and shareholders in listed biotech firms. Compliance teams must prioritize robust information barrier procedures and insider list management to mitigate similar penalties.
#
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new regulations but reinforces existing MAR requirements transposed into AMF General Regulation (e.g., Article 315-1), including:
Immediate public disclosure: Issuers must disclose inside information "as soon as possible" under MAR Article 17, unless three conditions for delay are met (legitimate interest, confidentiality ensured, no public misleading).
Prohibition on unlawful disclosure/use: Persons with inside information cannot disclose it except per
What You Need To Do
Assess information promptly
Implement controls
Maintain insider lists
Train personnel
Archive disclosures
Key Dates
As soon as possible- Disclose inside information publicly, or immediately if confidentiality breached during delay.
Immediately after publication- Notify AMF (differepublication@amf-france.org) of any delayed inside information post-publication.
Within 3 trading days- Managers/directors report securities transactions to issuer and AMF.
Within 10 business days- Custodians respond to Euroclear France/AMF requests for shareholder identity disclosures.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose personal and corporate fines for disclosure failures, particularly in volatile sectors like biotech where trial data qualifies as inside information. Firms risk market disruption, reputational damage, and escalating penalties (e.g., hundr
Market infrastructures Order Retail investors Market Infrastructures Journalists AMF publishes an analysis of retail investor order execution on French stocks
Short selling Equity Financial Crisis Executive & other private individuals Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists French and Dutch market authorities publish a joint analysis of the...
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF invites providers, users and rated entities to respond to ESMA's Call for evidence on the ESG rating market in Europe
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French stakeholders—ESG rating providers, users, and rated entities—to respond to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence on the EU ESG rating market to inform European Commission efforts on improving transparency and reliability. This matters as it contributes to the foundational data driving the ESG Ratings Regulation (EU 2024/3005), which imposes authorization, disclosure, and conflict-of-interest rules on providers, affecting sustainable finance compliance across the EU. With the regulation applying from 2 July 2026, early engagement helps shape final rules amid ongoing ESMA consultations on technical standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes responses to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence, which gathered market insights to support the European Commission's July 2021 sustainable finance strategy. However, it highlights the push for a European framework on ESG ratings, including transparency on methodologies, conflict-of-interest management, internal controls, and dialogue with rated companies—elements now codified in the ESG Ratings Regulation effective 2 January 202
What You Need To Do
For ESG Providers
For Users and Rated Entities
All Affected Firms
AMF Stakeholders
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The 2022 Call for Evidence is historical, but it feeds into the ESG Ratings Regulation now in force (since 2 January 2025), with application looming on 2 July 2026—less than 6 months away as of January 2026. Firms face authorization risks, operational overhauls for conflicts/disclosu
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Covid-19 Closing of the 2021 financial statements: the AMF publishes its recommendations and the results of its recent work examining financial statements
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Takeover listed companies The AMF proposes targeted measures to make financial markets more attractive for companies
Long term investment Retail investors Journalists More than one million new retail investors have entered equity markets in France over the last 3 years, according to the AMF's dashboard
Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The ACPR and AMF publish their report on climate-related commitments of French financial institutions
Sustainable Finance Annual report Disclosure Obligations Taxonomy Article 8: The AMF informs issuers about the phased application of reporting requirements
Asset management Transposition of the directive on the cross-border distribution of collective investment undertakings: the AMF amends its General Regulation and its policy
Cooperation Derivatives or structured products Europe & international Markets Post-trading infrastructures The AMF and the ACPR sign two cooperation agreements with the SEC regarding the regime applicable to Security Based Swap Dealers (SBSD) in the U.S
Asset management MMF The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation
Financial products Bids Shares Financial disclosures & corporate financing Markets The AMF publishes a study on the development of the SPAC market and its challenges
Following a satisfactory review of the data submitted by banks and credit unions, to the Central Credit Register, the initial enquiry phase has now commenced. This means that from today borrowers and lenders can request a copy of credit reports from the Central Credit Register. Data on mortgages, personal loans, credit cards and overdrafts, which is backdated to 30 June 2017, is live on the system and is incorporated into credit reports. From 30 September 2018 it will be compulsory for credit...
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) advises the clients of the websites www.interactiveoption.com, www.interactive-option.com, www.hellobrokers.com, www.mtxplus.com and www.pegasecapital.com to contact Pegase Capital Ltd, the owner of these websites, as soon as possible
Warning Warning Financial disclosures & corporate financing The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has issued a public warning against the activities of individuals impersonating the delegate of the AMF Ombudsman by making false referrals to FIN-NET, the European Commission body in charge of...