On 3 March 2026, we said we’d bring forward our planned review of the UK Listing Rules for Investment entities, including how they apply to board independence and related party provisions.Since then, there has been substantial debate over our role in relation to investment trusts, including calls for us to ‘get to grips’ with voting rules ‘that allow a minority shareholder to repeatedly attack an investment trust’.Much of this debate suggests there are misunderstandings about how investment t...
This FCA blog post announces an accelerated review of UK Listing Rules for investment entities, focusing on board independence, related party provisions, conflicts of interest, and shareholder rights amid debates over activist minority shareholders targeting investment trusts. It matters because it clarifies the FCA's limited role (rules apply to issuers, not shareholders), reinforces Companies Act protections, and signals upcoming proposals to ensure rules fit novel scenarios like concentrated ownership, potentially impacting governance and listing compliance for investment trusts.[FCA blog]
What Changed
No immediate regulatory changes or new requirements are introduced; this is a consultation precursor outlining a planned review. The review will assess:
Application of Listing Rules to board independence and related party transactions for investment entities.
How rules, alongside company law, support shareholder rights, engagement, and conflict management (e.g., protecting against "back door takeovers" by minority activists like Saba).
Proposals will be detailed in a consultation paper, with work completing by end-2026.
What You Need To Do
- Monitor and engage
- Review governance
- Enhance shareholder engagement
- Conflict checks
Key Dates
3 March 2026 - FCA announces acceleration of planned Listing Rules review for investment entities.[FCA blog]
End of 2026 - FCA to complete review and publish consultation paper with proposals.[FCA blog]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This signals future changes via consultation but imposes no immediate obligations; however, it heightens scrutiny on investment trust governance amid activist pressures, risking enforcement if conflicts or independence lapses occur pre-review. Matters for compliance teams to audit current setups against Listing Rules and Companies Act, avoiding missteps in high-profile cases like Saba campaigns, while preparing for end-2026 proposals that could tighten related party and board rules.[FCA blog]
Asset ManagerAll Firms
The FCA has fined Dinosaur Merchant Bank Limited (DMBL) £338,000 for failing to put in place effective systems and controls to detect and report suspicious trading in its contracts for difference (CFD) business. CFDs are sophisticated financial products that are used to speculate on various assets going up or down in value. Given their high-risk nature, firms must have strong and reliable surveillance arrangements to prevent insider dealing and market manipulation.In June 2024, DMBL introduce...
BankBroker Dealer
Supervisory Statement 9/17
**SS9/17 - Recovery Planning** is the PRA's supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK banks, building societies, and designated investment firms must prepare and maintain recovery plans to ensure financial stability during periods of stress. This guidance supersedes the previous SS18/13 and represents a substantial tightening of recovery planning requirements, making credible, testable, and executable recovery plans a core component of prudential regulation rather than a compliance checkbox.
What Changed
SS9/17 introduced several material enhancements to recovery planning requirements:
*Governance and Integration**: Recovery planning must be embedded within firms' risk management frameworks, with board-level oversight and integration with stress testing and ICAAP processes. The PRA expects clear governance documentation showing how plans are produced, reviewed, signed off, and implemented.
*Fire Drill Exercises**: Firms must conduct regular fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios in a live environment, testing governance arrangements, management information systems, and the...
What You Need To Do
- *Develop comprehensive recovery plans containing all minimum elements specified in the Recovery Planning Part of the PRA Rulebook and detailed in SS9/17
- *Establish governance frameworks documenting how recovery plans are produced, reviewed, approved by the board, and how recovery options would be implemented
- *Conduct fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios, test governance arrangements, and validate management information capabilities
- *Create implementation playbooks (for complex plans) that enable rapid execution by senior management during stress
- *Perform detailed impact analysis for each recovery option, quantifying capital and liquidity impacts with realistic timelines
Key Dates
11 December 2017 - SS9/17 first published and became effective
21 September 2017 - PRA consultation deadline for CP9/17 (the consultation paper preceding this statement) DEADLINE
Second half of 2017 - Proposed implementation date for superseding SS18/13 (achieved with December 2017 publication)
Ongoing - Firms must maintain and test recovery plans continuously; the PRA notes this statement "may be revised as recovery planning becomes further embedded in firms' risk management practices" DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankAll Firms
Policy statement 11/26
PS11/26 finalizes PRA rules enhancing Pillar 3 disclosures on resolvability resources (MREL), capital distribution constraints (CDCs), and disclosure basis for UK banks and building societies. It matters because it standardizes information to boost market discipline, user comparability, and confidence in orderly resolution, directly impacting financial stability and compliance reporting. No substantive changes from CP16/25 consultation, with minor clarifications only.
What Changed
Standardized MREL disclosure templates: Replaces free-form disclosures with four new templates aligned to Basel BCBS TLAC formats (adapted for UK), expanding scope to more firms for consistency on MREL adequacy.
Qualitative CDC narrative: Added to UK CC1 template for firms subject to CDCs, enabling market assessment of restriction impacts; removes obsolete Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB) disclosure post-O-SII buffer replacement.
Disclosure basis statement: Firms must specify their Pillar 3 regime (e.g., resolution entity, O-SII, large institution), frequency, and details like reference date,...
What You Need To Do
- Update Pillar 3 processes to use new MREL templates (Annex XXVII instructions), UK CC1 with CDC narrative, and basis statement (e
- For CDC-subject firms
- Ensure semi-annual disclosure of key metrics (Article 447 points a-g) where required
- Integrate into consolidated reporting for UK parents; test templates/instructions from appendices
- Review for alignment with broader CRR changes (e
Key Dates
17 March 2026 - PS11/26 and accompanying rule instruments (e.g., Disclosure (CRR) Instrument 2026) published.
1 January 2027 - Policy effective date; rules apply from this date.
H1 2027 - First disclosures under new policy published, covering period ending **31 December 2026** (annual/semi-annual as applicable).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 January 2027 requires immediate template/system updates for H1 2027 disclosures (year-end 2026 data), with standardized formats limiting flexibility and raising non-compliance risks to market discipline objectives. Impacts reporting teams, resolution planning, and investor relations; proportional design minimizes burden but demands proactive gap analysis given no transition grace beyond effective date.
BankBroker DealerAll Firms
This Market Notice sets out the schedule for sales in Q2 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Policy statement 7/26
PS7/26 finalizes PRA rules for standardized reporting of operational incidents and material third-party (MTP) arrangements, responding to CP17/24 consultation feedback by reducing firm burden through simplified templates and exclusions. This matters for compliance professionals as it enhances PRA oversight of operational resilience risks amid rising threats and third-party reliance, aligning with international standards like DORA and FSB FIRE while supporting identification of critical third parties (CTPs).
What Changed
MTP Reporting: Amended notification rule for clarity; scope excludes credit unions with <£50m assets and all third-country branches; separated register and notification templates with reduced data fields; single submission platform (FCA Connect).
Operational Incident Reporting: Merged three-phased reports (initial, interim, final) into one simplified, aligned template across PRA/FCA/Bank; removed fields, made more optional; clarified thresholds (e.g., safety/soundness, financial stability, policyholder protection for PRA), timing, and factors like contagion/reputation via SS1/26.
Guidance...
What You Need To Do
- Identify and notify MTP arrangements via FCA Connect (excluding exemptions); maintain annual register with reduced fields
- Monitor/assess operational incidents against clarified thresholds (e
- Update policies per SS1/26 (thresholds) and SS2/21 (MTP identification)
- Align reporting with PRA/FCA/Bank templates; use data for resilience prioritization
- For insurers
Key Dates
December 2024 - CP17/24 consultation published.
H1 2026 - Final PRA/FCA rules on operational incident and third-party reporting effective (per industry analysis).
30 working days post-incident resolution - Submit final incident report update (extendable to 60 working days in complex cases).
Annual - MTP register reporting (exact date not specified; aligns with notifications).
March 2026 implies rules near/applicable now; implementation likely immediate or phased per PS.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Mandates new reporting infrastructure and processes amid rising operational threats; non-compliance risks supervisory action on resilience vulnerabilities. Reduced burden from CP mitigates costs, but timely implementation critical for PRA oversight and CTP identification; benefits (e.g., thematic analysis) outweigh costs per PRA.
BankInsuranceAll Firms
Supervisory statement 1/26
SS1/26 outlines the PRA's expectations for firms to report operational incidents via a structured three-phase process (initial, intermediate, final) as mandated in the PRA Rulebook's Regulatory Reporting Part, Chapter 24, to enhance UK financial sector resilience by capturing incidents risking firm safety, policyholder protection, or stability. This matters because it standardizes reporting, enabling timely PRA oversight and reducing inconsistencies in incident data collection across regulated entities.
What Changed
Introduces clear reporting thresholds in Regulatory Reporting Rule 24.2: Firms must report if an incident poses risks to UK financial stability, firm safety/soundness, or (for insurers) policyholder protection; factors include operational/financial contagion, service disruptions, data loss to external users, or regulatory/media attention.
Mandates a phased reporting approach (Rule 24.1-24.4): Initial report as soon as practicable (expected within 24 hours of threshold determination); intermediate updates for significant changes (e.g., impact escalation, BCP activation, resolution); final...
What You Need To Do
- Assess incidents against PRA thresholds (e
- Submit phased reports using specified fields
- Maintain processes for prompt classification, data gathering, and submission while prioritizing resolution; continue ad-hoc supervisory notifications if needed
- Review internal policies to align severity ratings with PRA thresholds; document assessments
- For critical third-party (CTP) incidents, both firms and CTPs report uniquely
Key Dates
18 March 2026 - Publication date of SS1/26.
18 March 2027 - Effective date; firms must comply with reporting requirements. DEADLINE
Within 24 hours - Expected submission of initial phase report after determining threshold met (as soon as practicable).
Each significant change - Intermediate phase update(s), including at resolution.
Within 30 working days of resolution - Final phase report (extendable to 60 working days if impracticable).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With effectiveness just over one year away (18 March 2027), firms must urgently map incident management frameworks to new thresholds/phases, update policies, train staff, and test reporting (e.g., via simulations), as non-compliance risks enforcement under PRA rules and heightened scrutiny on resilience amid rising cyber/operational threats. This elevates operational resilience from preparation (e.g., IMT testing by March 2025) to active reporting, demanding integrated tech/governance upgrades.
BankInsuranceAll Firms
The Prudential Regulation Authority has today published proposals aimed at ensuring banks can monetise liquid assets quickly in a fast-paced stress event – such as the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023.
The PRA has launched a three-month consultation on modernized liquidity standards designed to ensure banks can rapidly convert liquid assets to cash during stress events, responding directly to lessons from the 2023 collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse. Rather than requiring banks to hold more liquid assets, the reforms focus on **operationalizing existing liquidity** through enhanced stress testing, removal of exemptions for sovereign bonds, and improved preparedness for central bank facility access.
What Changed
The consultation proposes four primary regulatory modifications:
Weekly stress testing requirement: Firms must conduct internal stress tests evaluating rapid outflows within one week, supplementing the existing monthly reporting framework
Removal of Level 1 asset exemption: Sovereign bonds and other "level 1 assets" will no longer be exempt from annual testing of monetization capability for non-liquid assets, closing a significant testing gap
Barrier identification mandate: Firms must systematically evaluate their liquidity, identify barriers to asset monetization, and document...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (by April 27, 2026)
- Review the full consultation document and impact assessment
- Identify internal stakeholders (Treasury, Risk, Operations, Compliance) for response coordination
- Assess current liquidity stress testing capabilities against proposed weekly timeframe requirement
- *Medium-term (post-consultation, pre-implementation):
Key Dates
March 17, 2026 - Consultation launch (today)
April 27, 2026 - Consultation closes (three-month window)
Early 2027 – 2030 - Implementation timeline for final rules (phased approach)
September 30, 2026 - Insurance liquidity reporting effective date (parallel reform)
early 2027 as the earliest likely start date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankAsset ManagerInsurance
Policy statement 6/26
PS6/26 finalizes the PRA's policy on recognized exchanges (REs) under Article 4(1)(72)(c) of the UK CRR, shifting responsibility to firms for assessing exchange and asset liquidity conditions while restating main indices in the PRA Rulebook and revoking SS20/13. This matters for PRA-regulated firms as it enables more dynamic, risk-sensitive capital treatments for traded assets, potentially expanding eligible REs and supporting competitiveness without PRA pre-approval.
What Changed
New Recognised Exchanges (CRR) Part in the PRA Rulebook: Specifies conditions for REs focusing on (i) exchange/market structure risk (e.g., operational robustness of clearing/settlement) and (ii) asset liquidity risk; firms must assess and document compliance.
Restatement of main indices: List from Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/1646 moved to PRA Glossary without policy changes.
Amendment to 'higher risk equity exposure' definition: Aligns with Basel 3.1 near-final rules, excluding qualifying listed equities from higher risk weights under the standardized approach (ties to exchange...
What You Need To Do
- Assess exchanges/assets
- Update policies/systems
- Review exposures
Key Dates
18 June 2025 - Consultation deadline for CP3/25 (closed; feedback incorporated in PS6/26). DEADLINE
1 July 2026 - Implementation date for new RE rules, main indices restatement, SS20/13 revocation, and related Rulebook amendments.
1 January 2027 - Proposed implementation for Basel 3.1 changes, including higher risk equity exposure amendments (alongside broader standards).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 July 2026 (approx. 4 months from now), requiring immediate gap analysis, policy updates, and assessor training to avoid capital miscalculations or supervisory findings. Impacts prudential calculations directly, with flexibility reducing PRA burden but increasing firm accountability and review risks.
Bank
John Wood Group PLC (Wood Group) has been fined £12,993,700 for publishing inaccurate information in its financial results. Following the poor performance of certain projects, Wood Group’s accounting judgements were inappropriately influenced by its desire to maintain previously stated financial results. Wood Group did not have adequate systems, controls or procedures to prevent this from happening.This resulted in Wood Group publishing inaccurate information in its full-year 2022 and 2023 fi...
All Firms
We are bringing forward a review of some aspects of the UK Listing Rules to consider how they apply to specific types of investment entities. As part of the Primary Markets EffectivenessReviewwe explored which types of investment entities could be eligible to be listed. Since introducing the new listingruleswe have heard from stakeholders that these eligibility criteria, particularlyregardingrisk-spreading, may be unduly restrictive. We will use this review to assess if changes should be made...
The FCA is conducting a targeted review of UK Listing Rules applicable to investment entities, with particular focus on whether current risk-spreading eligibility criteria are unduly restrictive and how rules support shareholder rights and conflict management. This review represents a potential material shift in listing accessibility for alternative investment funds and closed-ended investment vehicles, with final proposals expected by end-2026.
What Changed
The FCA's review addresses three primary areas:
*Risk-Spreading Eligibility Criteria**
Stakeholders have flagged that current risk-spreading requirements in the new listing rules may be overly restrictive for certain investment entity types. The FCA will assess whether modifications are warranted to broaden eligibility for investment entities seeking primary market access.
*Shareholder Rights and Board Governance**
The review will examine how listing rules, in conjunction with company law, ensure boards adequately support shareholder rights, facilitate shareholder engagement, and manage...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (Q1 2026)
- *Monitor FCA consultation announcements for publication of the consultation paper on listing rules modifications
- *Assess current compliance posture against existing risk-spreading criteria to identify potential gaps or restrictive elements
- *Document shareholder engagement frameworks and conflict-of-interest management procedures to prepare for governance review
- *During consultation period
Key Dates
End of 2026 - FCA to complete review and issue final rules
Q2 2026 (estimated) - Consultation paper publication (FCA indicates "proposals in a consultation paper" without specific date, but typical FCA consultation windows are 8-12 weeks)
H2 2026 - Final rules expected following consultation period
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Asset ManagerHedge Fund
Speech by Nikhil Rathi, FCA chief executive, at the Goldman Sachs EMEA Head of Trading conference 2026. And as we roll with the punches, we also shouldn’t sell ourselves short.We gained ground last year - London just one point behind New York in the latest Global Financial Centres Index.There is understandable focus on equities market share and listings, where we have delivered far-reaching regulatory reforms.But on FX trading, international debt issuance, OTC derivatives, parts of commoditie...
Broker DealerHedge FundBank Our clarification about forbearance following the introduction of the new Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations (POATRs) regime. On 19 January 2026, the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations (POATRs) regime and associated changes to our listing processes in the UK Listing Rules (UKLR) came into force. These changes introduced a requirement in the Prospectus Regime Manual (PRM 1.6.4R) for issuers to notify a Regulatory Information Service (RIS) of any admission to t...
The FCA's statement clarifies forbearance on overlapping notification requirements for admissions to trading under the new POATRs regime effective 19 January 2026, addressing confusion from removed block listing exemptions in UKLR. It matters because it provides temporary relief from duplicative RIS notifications for frequent issuers, preventing unintended supervisory burdens while the FCA consults on rule amendments.
What Changed
POATRs and UKLR Updates: Effective 19 January 2026, PRM 1.6.4R requires issuers to notify a Regulatory Information Service (RIS) of any admission to trading within 60 days, allowing grouping of multiple admissions for proportionality.
Overlapping UKLR Rules: Provisions in UKLR 6.4.4R(4), 13.3.20R(4), 14.3.17R(4), 16.3.16R(4), and 22.2.17R(4) require "as soon as possible" RIS notifications for new equity issues or public offers, conflicting with the 60-day rule post-block listing deletion (former UKLR 20.6).
Forbearance Policy: FCA will not take enforcement action for non-compliance with the...
What You Need To Do
- Review ongoing/future issuances against former block listing criteria: confirm securities unissued pre-19 January 2026 and same purpose to rely on forbearance
- Implement PRM 1.6.4R
- Monitor FCA announcements for consultation launch and updates; prepare responses if issuing frequently
- Document reliance on forbearance (e
- No immediate "as soon as possible" notifications needed under forbearance for qualifying cases
Key Dates
19 January 2026 - POATRs regime and UKLR changes effective, including PRM 1.6.4R (60-day RIS notification) and deletion of UKLR 20.6 block listings.
19 January 2026 - Cut-off for securities under former block listings to qualify for forbearance (must not have been issued/offered prior). DEADLINE
Shortly after February 2026 - FCA consultation on removing UKLR 6.4.4R(4) and equivalents (no exact date specified).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Forbearance reduces immediate risk of enforcement for qualifying issuers, but ongoing POATRs compliance (60-day notifications) is mandatory. Matters for operational efficiency, as misalignment could lead to duplicative reporting costs; non-qualifying issuances risk breaches until consultation resolves.
All Firms
Consultation paper 3/26
The PRA's CP3/26 proposes rule amendments to align its Rulebook with HM Treasury's (HMT) Overseas Prudential Requirements Regime (OPRR), which restates and modifies existing CRR equivalence provisions for treating overseas entities' exposures as preferential "exposures to institutions." This matters for **PRA-authorised firms** as it clarifies capital treatment for cross-border exposures, reduces interpretive burdens, and ensures consistency post-Brexit, advancing the PRA's safety and soundness objective while facilitating HMT designations.
What Changed
Credit Risk Standardised Approach (SA): Exposures to overseas credit institutions, investment firms, or exchanges treated as "exposures to institutions" only if from UK or HMT-designated OPRR jurisdictions; deletes CRR Article 119(5) for investment firms under Part 9C rules.
IRB Approach: Preserves CRR Article 107(3) effect by aligning exposure class allocation with SA's updated "exposures to institutions" concept.
Large Exposures: Amends Rule 1.3 definition of "institution" to limit preferential treatment to UK or OPRR-designated overseas entities.
General Scope: Applies changes across PRA...
What You Need To Do
- Review and respond to consultation by 2 April 2026, indicating consent for name/organisation publication and any confidentiality claims
- Assess current exposures to overseas institutions/exchanges against proposed OPRR criteria; model impacts on capital requirements under SA, IRB, and large exposures rules
- Update internal policies on exposure classification once final rules published; monitor HMT OPRR designations for affected jurisdictions
- Indicate response as individual or organisational; personal data handled per Bank of England privacy notice
Key Dates
Thursday 2 April 2026 - Consultation response deadline; submit to CP3_26@bankofengland.co.uk or PRA at 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA. DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must engage promptly on consultation (deadline ~10 weeks from publication) to influence outcomes; changes clarify but could increase capital for non-designated overseas exposures, impacting safety/soundness and competitiveness. Failure to adapt risks non-compliance with updated Rulebook and higher prudential burdens.
BankAll Firms
Consultation paper 2/26
CP2/26 is a PRA consultation paper proposing targeted reforms to UK securitisation rules to reduce prescriptiveness and burden while maintaining prudential soundness, building on recent CRR restatements. It matters for compliance professionals as it streamlines due diligence, risk retention, disclosures, and capital treatments, potentially lowering costs for PRA-authorised firms in the securitisation market amid Basel 3.1 implementation. These changes aim to enhance proportionality without compromising investor protection or oversight.
What Changed
The proposals amend PRA rules and supervisory guidance in the Securitisation Part of the PRA Rulebook, including:
Due diligence: Remove prescriptive verification of credit-granting criteria (Chapter 2 Article 9), risk retention (Chapter 2 Article 6 and Chapter 4), STS criteria, specific information availability, ongoing monitoring lists, stress testing, internal reporting to management, and demonstration of understanding to PRA; replace with proportionate consideration of credit-granting standards.
Risk retention: Introduce a new combined modality merging two existing ones.
Market disclosure...
What You Need To Do
- Review and respond
- Gap analysis
- Coordinate with FCA
- Policy updates
- Monitor legislation
Key Dates
18 May 2026 - Consultation response deadline. DEADLINE
1 January 2027 - Expected implementation aligning with Basel 3.1 and CRR restatement (PS3/26), with transitional arrangements to 2030.
Post-SI (TBD) - Changes to repository requirements effective upon HM Treasury Statutory Instrument amending UK Securitisation Regulation 2024.
1 January 2026 - Related CRR/Solvency II restatement (PS12/25) already effective, preserving core securitisation requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Proposals reduce burden (e.g., less prescriptive due diligence, streamlined disclosures) but require immediate review ahead of 18 May 2026 deadline and 1 January 2027 implementation, aligning with Basel 3.1. Non-response risks misaligned systems during CRR restatement transition; benefits include cost savings and proportionality, but firms must validate ongoing compliance with retained prudential standards.
BankInsuranceAll Firms
The Market Participants Group (MPG) is a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer Given at the London School of Economics
BankInsuranceAll Firms
We have signed an Exchange of Letters with the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA). IFSCA is the unified regulator for financial institutions operating in Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City), India’s first international financial services centre.This agreement affirms both authorities’ commitment to develop our regulatory relationship.Download our letter (PDF)The letters set out the intention to share regulatory knowledge and best practice to support the ...
The FCA has signed an Exchange of Letters with India's IFSCA, the regulator for GIFT City, to foster regulatory cooperation, knowledge sharing, and stronger links between UK financial markets and GIFT City. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals expanding cross-border ties, potentially easing market access and harmonizing standards for firms operating between the UK and India, amid the FCA's broader global outreach strategy. No binding rules are imposed, but it sets the stage for future alignment in areas like fintech and financial services.
What Changed
There are no direct regulatory changes or new requirements imposed by this Exchange of Letters. It is a non-binding agreement focused on:
Sharing regulatory knowledge and best practices.
Supporting financial services development in both jurisdictions.
Promoting links between GIFT City and UK markets.
The letters affirm commitment to developing the regulatory relationship, with an additional step of posting an FCA Financial Services Attaché to the British Deputy High Commission in Mumbai later in 2026 [FCA publication].
What You Need To Do
- binding nature
- Review and download the full Exchange of Letters (PDF available via FCA site) to understand shared priorities
- Assess current India/GIFT City exposures and prepare for potential future information-sharing requests or aligned standards
- Monitor FCA news for follow-up developments, such as joint guidance on fintech or market access https://www
- Engage with FCA international teams if planning cross-border activities in GIFT City
Key Dates
Later in 2026 - Posting of FCA Financial Services Attaché to British Deputy High Commission in Mumbai to support regulatory relationship development [FCA publication].
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a cooperative MoU-style letter exchange without immediate rules, penalties, or obligations, posing minimal disruption risk. It matters strategically for long-term planning, as it could lead to simplified compliance for UK-India activities (e.g., reduced dual-regulation friction) and aligns with FCA's pattern of global pacts that indirectly shape supervisory expectations. Firms with India exposure should note it for horizon scanning, but no urgent resourcing is needed.
BankFintechAll Firms
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
The FCA has fined Dipesh Kerai and Bhavesh Hirani for insider dealing in shares of Bidstack Group Plc. Mr Kerai has been fined £52,731, and Mr Hirani has been fined £56,000.In December 2021, Mr Hirani was the interim Chief Financial Officer at Bidstack, a company that placed advertising inside video games. This meant he had access to inside information about a major upcoming deal between Bidstack and a large video game publisher.Before it was announced to the public, Mr Hirani passed this con...
Broker DealerAsset Manager
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
We have published a letter to trade associations to provide an update in the development of a Future Entity (FE) for open banking. The letter confirms the appointment of KPMG to provide an independent assessment of proposals to establish a standards-setting body for UK open banking APIs that is capable of becoming the Future Entity. It explains the purpose and scope of the assessment, the respective roles of the FCA, industry, trade associations and the independent assessor, and how firms can...
The FCA has appointed KPMG to conduct an independent assessment of proposals for establishing a **Future Entity** – a standards-setting body for UK open banking APIs that will replace Open Banking Limited. This initiative is critical because it establishes the governance framework for open banking ahead of new legislative powers the FCA will receive under the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, with a statutory instrument expected by end-2026.
What Changed
The regulatory landscape for UK open banking is undergoing fundamental restructuring:
Transition of regulatory authority: The FCA is becoming the primary regulator for open banking, replacing the Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC).
Future Entity establishment: A new standards-setting body will become the primary UK standard-setting organization for open banking APIs, responsible for setting and maintaining common standards for minimum service and interoperability, monitoring API performance, and providing directory and certification services.
Independent assessment process: KPMG...
What You Need To Do
- *For industry participants and trade associations
- *Engage with the assessment process
- *Arrange FCA Q&A sessions
- *Coalesce behind proposals
- *Prepare for VRP implementation
Key Dates
February 2026 – Independent assessment process begins; KPMG commences evaluation of proposals
Q1 2026 – Final design of Future Entity expected; live transactions expected through VRP scheme
Before March 2026 – FCA's Open Finance roadmap due for publication DEADLINE
Early April 2026 – KPMG delivers final assessment report; FCA publishes on its website
From April 2026 – Industry and regulators collaborate to progress establishment activity
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankPayment ProviderFintech In October 2025, 25 financial institutions active in the UK foreign exchange (FX) market participated in the semi-annual turnover survey for the Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC).
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
Given at an event hosted by the Association of Foreign Banks
BankBroker DealerHedge Fund
Given at The Tokenisation Summit
BankFintechCrypto Exchange
We have signed a contract with Etrading Software (ETS) to deliver the UK bond consolidated tape. A high-quality tape will provide investors with a comprehensive overview of the bond market and support price formation and liquidity. It will help maintain the UK’s position as a highly competitive and compelling place to invest and grow.ETS has now launched a website that sets out key milestones and provides technical information for data contributors and users. We will continue to support ETS a...
Broker DealerAsset ManagerBank The latest Accelerated Settlement Taskforce (AST) report updates on the significant progress made towards the move to T+1. Read the AST report.Jamie Bell, head of capital markets at the FCA, said:'T+1 marks a major milestone in our drive to support growth and innovation. Faster settlement cycles will reduce risk, free up capital for faster reinvestment and align with other major markets.'We are delighted to see the great progress made last year highlighted in the AST’s report. By the end of t...
Broker DealerBankAsset Manager Guidance consultations
GC25/1 within Primary Market Bulletin No. 55 consults on targeted amendments to FCA Knowledge Base technical notes to align with UK Listing Rules (UKLR) changes effective 29 July 2024 and a new ESEF taxonomy for digital reporting. This matters for listed issuers and advisors as it updates formal guidance on periodic reporting, inside information handling, and position disclosures, ensuring compliance with post-reform listing regime requirements.
What Changed
Amendments to five technical notes: FCA/TN/506.2 (Periodic financial information and inside information), Primary Market/TN/507.1 (Structured digital reporting for IFRS annual statements, reflecting new ESEF taxonomy per DTR 4.1.15R), UKLA/TN/520.2 (Delaying disclosure/dealing with leaks and rumours), UKLA/TN/521.3 (Assessing and handling inside information), and UKLA/TN/542.2 (Issuer's obligations on position disclosures).
Broader PMB 55 finalises 44 notes (e.g., TN/209.4 on Listing Principle 2 notifications, TN/305.3 on hostile takeovers, TN/307.2 on aggregating transactions for...
What You Need To Do
- Review blacklined amendments in GC25/1 and PMB 55; submit feedback by 15 May 2025 if impacted
- Update internal policies, training, and procedures to reflect finalised notes (e
- Until finalised, interpret existing guidance in light of UKLR; monitor for TN/710 update in future PMB
- For digital reporting, prepare for new ESEF taxonomy in annual IFRS statements
Key Dates
2025 Guidance Consultation opens.
2025 Guidance Consultation closes; comments due to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk. DEADLINE
July 2025 (target) - FCA intends to finalise consulted notes.
2024 UKLR effective date (context for updates).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Past consultation deadline (15 May 2025) as of January 2026, but finalisation expected by July 2025 requires proactive policy reviews to avoid non-compliance with updated listing guidance. Matters for market integrity and operational alignment with UKLR reforms, with low immediate risk but potential enforcement exposure post-finalisation.
All Firms
Guidance consultations
The FCA's GC25/2: Primary Market Bulletin No. 57 (PMB 57), published 25 July 2025, consults on amendments to Technical Note 710.1 ('Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors') and a new Technical Note 638.1 on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules for prospectuses. This matters as it updates the Knowledge Base to align with the new UK Listing Regime (UKLR) and Prospectus Rules, providing clarity for sponsors and issuers ahead of the PRM sourcebook effective January 2026, reducing compliance risks in primary markets.
What Changed
Amendments to TN 710.1 (Sponsor Services: Principles for Sponsors): Revisions clarify the scope of 'preparatory work' and sponsor obligations under UKLR 4, building on feedback from PMB 48, 53, and PS24/6; changes marked against PMB 53 version.
New TN 638.1 (Guidance on complex financial history and significant financial commitment rules): Updated draft provides detailed guidance for prospectus applications by companies with complex histories (e.g., acquisitive models), including scenarios, examples, and key terms like 'significant acquisition'; based on current PRR/UK Prospectus Regulation...
What You Need To Do
- Review and respond
- Update policies/processes
- Monitor finalisation
- Implement NSM changes
Key Dates
2025 Consultation opens (GC25/2 published).
2025 Consultation closes (submit comments to primarymarketbulletin@fca.org.uk).
2025 National Storage Mechanism changes effective (per PS24/19).
of 2025 Aim to finalise TN 710.
2026 New Prospectus Rules: Admission to Trading on a Regulated Market (PRM) sourcebook, UKLR changes, and Market Conduct amendments effective (per PS25/9).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Consultation closed 12/09/2025 (past deadline as of January 2026), but final notes (e.g., TN 710 by end-2025) and PRM effective 19/01/2026 require immediate policy reviews to avoid prospectus rejections or sponsor breaches. Matters for primary market competitiveness and investor protection under evolving UKLR/PRM, with no material CBA changes from CP23/31/CP24/12.
Broker DealerAll Firms
Consultation papers
The FCA's CP25/31 proposes a regulatory framework for introducing a UK equity Consolidated Tape (CT), operated by a Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP), to collate and distribute comprehensive post-trade data (prices and volumes) across trading venues and OTC trades in equities, including shares, ETFs, depository receipts, and similar instruments. This matters for compliance as it imposes new data contribution obligations on trading venues and APAs, aims to enhance market transparency and competitiveness under the FCA's 2025-2030 Strategy, and builds on FSMA 2023 powers for Data Reporting Services Providers (DRSPs). Firms must engage now to shape rules via consultation, with potential operations targeted for 2027.
What Changed
CTP Obligations: Proposed rules establish core regulatory requirements for CTPs, including governance, operational resiliency, data collation/distribution, competitive pricing, and simple licensing structures to ensure accessibility and affordability.
Data Contributor Obligations: Trading venues and Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs) must provide trade data (e.g., prices, volumes) to the CTP, covering trades across venues and OTC equity transactions.
Scope and Outcomes: CT focuses on post-trade data initially (with trade-offs on pre-trade inclusion); seeks to increase UK equity data...
What You Need To Do
- Respond to Consultation
- Data Readiness
- Monitor Updates
- Engage Stakeholders
- Compliance Mapping
Key Dates
2025 Consultation opens and CP25/31 first published.
2026 Consultation page last updated; period extended.
2026 Consultation closes (extended from original dates).
2026 FCA to publish CP on equity transparency regime (linked to CT).
2027 Target for equity CT to be operational.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While still in consultation (closes 13/02/2026), proposals mandate data contributions from trading venues/APAs and CTP setup, with 2027 operations targeted; non-engagement risks misaligned systems or missed CTP opportunities. Matters due to FSMA 2023 empowerment, links to equity transparency reforms (CP25/20), and strategic push for UK market competitiveness – firms face new reporting/resiliency burdens but gain liquidity/transparency benefits.
Broker DealerAll Firms
Given at the Resolution Foundation
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
We have issued a joint statement with the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) giving clarity on open banking pricing models. We and the PSR have issued the following statement (PDF).This confirms we will not, at this stage, prioritise a Competition Act 1998 (CA98) investigation into the centralised ‘access fee’ pricing model being developed by the UK Payments Initiative (UKPI) for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs). cVRPs are an emerging open banking technology that allow consumers to...
The FCA and PSR have jointly confirmed they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation into the UK Payments Initiative's (UKPI) centralized access fee pricing model for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs), with the CMA's concurrent agreement. This regulatory clarity provides temporary certainty for cVRP development ahead of anticipated legislation by end-2026, creating a critical window for firms to develop compliant commercial models in this emerging open banking technology.
What Changed
The regulatory statement establishes the following key positions:
Non-prioritization of CA98 investigation: The FCA, PSR, and CMA have jointly confirmed they will not prioritize competition law enforcement against UKPI's centralized access fee model for Phase 1/Wave 1 cVRPs (limited to "lower risk" use cases).
Scope limitation: The regulatory clarity applies only to Phase 1/Wave 1 of UKPI's cVRP scheme, specifically addressing lower-risk payment use cases including regulated financial services, utilities, and public sector payments.
Temporary framework: This is explicitly a temporary...
What You Need To Do
- *For UKPI and participating firms
- *Governance documentation
- *Pricing methodology transparency
- *Phase 1/Wave 1 compliance
- *Market engagement
Key Dates
15 January 2026 - FCA and PSR wrote to CMA setting out their non-prioritization position
16 January 2026 - CMA confirmed alignment with FCA/PSR position on CA98 prioritization
20 January 2026 - Joint FCA/PSR statement issued on open banking pricing models
Q1 2026 - Expected first live UKPI cVRP payments
End of 2026 - Government anticipated to introduce legislative framework granting FCA new open banking powers
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
The FCA and PSR have issued a joint statement providing clarity on open banking pricing models, specifically regarding the centralised 'access fee' pricing model for commercial Variable Recurring Payments (cVRPs). This statement confirms that they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation into this model at this stage. The goal is to support the development of cVRPs, giving consumers more control over their payments and lowering processing fees for businesses.
What Changed
The FCA and PSR have clarified their enforcement position on the UKPI's proposal for a commercial model for cVRPs, indicating they will not prioritize a Competition Act 1998 investigation at this stage.
What You Need To Do
- Monitor market developments and updates on the legislative framework for open banking
- Review and understand the implications of the centralised 'access fee' pricing model for cVRPs on your business operations
- Ensure compliance with existing competition laws and regulations
Key Dates
31 Dec 2026 Expected implementation of the government's legislative framework for open banking DEADLINE
1 Jul 2027 End of the temporary measure if the legislative framework is not implemented DEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties for non-compliance with competition laws and regulations
Related Regulations
Competition Act 1998Payment Services Directive (PSD2)
Confidence: high
BankFintechPayment Provider Policy statement 1/26
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusion of the current financial year in the three-year average calculation (or an estimate if...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (by mid-2026)
- *Conduct impact assessment
- *Review IRB permissions
- *Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
- *Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026 – PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027 – Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027 – Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028 – FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadline – Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessment DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
- Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
- Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
- Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027 Basel 3.1 rules take effect DEADLINE
1 Jan 2028 Internal model approach for market risk takes effect DEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Basel 3.1Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Financial Services and Markets Act (FSMA) 2023
Confidence: high
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
Policy statement 3/26
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based Approach), SS3/24 (Credit risk definition of default), SoP6/25 (Internal Model Method permissions),...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (by Q2 2026)
- *Review applicability
- *Assess impact
- *Identify policy changes
- *Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026 - PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025 - PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027 - All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
- Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
- Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
- Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027 The restated CRR provisions take effect DEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
Confidence: high
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
We have opened applications for the second cohort of our AI Live Testing service. AI Live Testing is the first of its kind in the financial sector to help firms who are ready to use AI in UK financial markets. Participating firms receive tailored support from our regulatory team and our technical partner Advai to develop, assess and deploy safe and responsible AI.The service helps firms to consider key questions around evaluating AI including governance, risk management and monitoring to help...
BankFintechAsset Manager
The FCA has fined Russel Gerrity £309,843 for using inside information to net himself £128,765. As a consultant, Mr Gerrity had access to information about whether oil and gas had been discovered during the drilling of wells. Between October 2018 and January 2022, he took advantage of this and used inside information to buy shares in Chariot Oil & Gas Limited and Eco (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Plc ahead of announcements that increased their price. On another occasion, he used inside information t...
Broker DealerAsset Manager
The FCA, Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority have together signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities to enhance cooperation and oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) that fall under the UK’s CTP regime.The MoU establishes a framework for coordinating and sharing information on the oversight of CTPs under the UK regime and critical third party providers (CTPPs) under the EU’s Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), including du...
The FCA, Bank of England (BoE), and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) to coordinate oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) under the UK's CTP regime and critical third party providers (CTPPs) under the EU's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). This matters because it enhances cross-border information sharing and cooperation during incidents like cyber-attacks, reducing regulatory duplication while bolstering financial stability and operational resilience for firms reliant on these providers.
What Changed
Establishes a framework for timely information sharing, coordination of oversight activities, and joint responses to incidents affecting CTPs/CTPPs, including power outages or cyber-attacks.
Defines principles for cooperation on mutually designated CTPs/CTPPs, including notifications of investigations and best endeavors to share material information where legally and operationally feasible.
Complements the UK's CTP regime (effective 1 January 2025), which requires designated CTPs to provide regular assurance, conduct resilience testing, and report major incidents, without altering firms'...
What You Need To Do
- For CTPs/CTPPs
- For financial firms/FMIs
- Regulators' internal actions
- Firms should review contracts with third parties for compliance alignment and conduct gap analyses against CTP requirements
Key Dates
1 January 2025 UK CTP rules came into effect, applying to CTPs designated by HMT.
Ongoing (process begun pre-2025) HMT designation process for CTPs, with regulators recommending based on concentration and materiality criteria; no fixed end date specified.
DORA effective date (prior context) EU CTPPs oversight under DORA aligns with UK regime; MoU signed to ensure compatibility (exact DORA timeline not in publication but supports post-2024 implementation).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The MoU operationalizes the live UK CTP regime (effective January 2025), with designations underway, amplifying risks of non-compliance for firms using critical ICT providers amid rising cyber and resilience threats. It matters for cross-border firms as it enables regulator-to-regulator data sharing, potentially exposing gaps in outsourcing arrangements and increasing enforcement scrutiny without fines on CTPs yet possible future powers.
BankPayment ProviderAll Firms
We reviewed how firms sell complex exchange traded products (ETPs) to retail consumers. Complex ETPs are a subset of the wider ETP market and include high-risk investment strategies that can be difficult for retail consumers to understand.We assessed how firms of different sizes and business models evaluate these products, communicate key risks and monitor outcomes under the Consumer Duty.Given the complexity and risk profile of ETPs, it is essential firms make sure investors have the knowled...
Asset ManagerBroker DealerWealth Manager
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
This page contains information about fines published during 2026. The total amount of fines so far is £371,700. Firm or individual finedDateAmountReasonRichard Adam07/01/2026£232,800The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Rule 1.3.3R, Listing Principle 1 and Premium Listing Principle 2.Zafar Khan07/01/2026£138,900The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Ru...
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
This Market Notice sets out the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
We confirm that the FCA has opened an investigation into WH Smith PLC. The investigation concerns potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules and Disclosure and Transparency Rules in relation to the matters announced by WH Smith PLC on 19 November 2025.
The FCA has launched an investigation into WH Smith PLC for potential breaches of UK Listing Principles and Rules, as well as Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs), stemming from announcements made by the company on 19 November 2025. This underscores the FCA's heightened scrutiny of listed companies' disclosure practices and adherence to market conduct standards. Compliance professionals should note this as a signal of enforcement risk in timely and accurate market disclosures, potentially setting precedents for similar cases.
What Changed
This is not a policy change or new rule; it is an enforcement investigation announcement with no immediate regulatory amendments. It highlights ongoing enforcement of existing rules:
UK Listing Principles and Rules: These require listed issuers to act with integrity, provide accurate and timely information, and maintain effective systems for compliance (e.g., Principle 2 on communication with investors; Listing Rule 9 on continuing obligations).
Disclosure and Transparency Rules (DTRs): Specifically, DTR 4 mandates inside information disclosures via Regulatory Information Service (RIS), DTR 5...
What You Need To Do
- For WH Smith PLC
- For other listed firms
- announcement sign-off processes involving legal/compliance/IR
- plan profit warnings or material updates, documenting decision trails
Key Dates
19 November 2025 - WH Smith PLC announcement triggering the investigation (reference point for alleged breaches).
late 2026 or 2027. Firms should monitor FCA updates via the specific URL or FCA enforcement news.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This matters due to the FCA's aggressive enforcement posture on market abuse/disclosures (e.g., post-SPPF reforms emphasizing individual accountability). Breaches can lead to multimillion-pound fines (e.g., 10% of annual revenue), director bans, and reputational damage, amplified by public naming. For listed firms, it signals rising risk in a volatile economic environment where trading updates are frequent; non-compliance could cascade to shareholder claims or delisting risks.
All Firms
The FCA welcomes the Government’s consultation on a new benchmarks regime for the UK. Since the introduction of the current regulatory framework, the financial landscape has evolved significantly. We now have an opportunity to build a regime that is more targeted to current market conditions and to reduce unnecessary burdens on industry, without compromising high standards. We are working with the Government to reform the current benchmarks regime to ensure that the regulatory framework remai...
The FCA welcomes HM Treasury's consultation on reforming the UK Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) to create a narrower, risk-based **Specified Authorised Benchmarks Regime (SABR)**, reducing regulatory scope by 80-90% to target only systemically important benchmarks and administrators while easing burdens on industry. This matters for compliance professionals as it shifts from broad regulation of all benchmarks to targeted oversight, requiring firms to reassess benchmark usage, prepare for transition, and adapt to FCA rules on risk management, enhancing UK competitiveness post-FSMA 2023 repeal of assimilated laws.
What Changed
Narrower scope: Regulation limited to benchmarks/administrators designated by HM Treasury (HMT) on FCA advice, based on criteria like systemic impact on UK financial integrity, consumers, or markets; reduces coverage by 80-90%, with no distinction between critical/significant/other types or benchmark categories (e.g., interest rate, commodity).
FCA-led firm-facing rules: HMT delegates requirements (governance, conflicts, oversight, methodology transparency, record-keeping) to FCA Handbook; removes legislative obligations on users to only use registered benchmarks, replaced by FCA...
What You Need To Do
- Review current benchmarks for potential designation risk (systemic impact criteria) and map usage across portfolios
- Participate in HMT consultation (responses via gov
- Develop/revise policies for benchmark risk management, including cessation/wind-down plans for regulated/non-regulated benchmarks per future FCA guidance
- Assess transition from current authorisation (if non-designated, prepare for deregistration); overseas firms evaluate ORR eligibility
- Update governance/conflicts frameworks for any designated activities; monitor ESG data inclusion in rules
Key Dates
17 December 2025 - HM Treasury publishes consultation on benchmarks regime reform.
1 January 2026 - Reforms take initial effect; UK becomes only jurisdiction regulating all local benchmarks pre-reform; EU BMR reforms effective, highlighting UK divergence.
Due course 2026 - FCA consults on regulatory requirements for designated administrators/users.
2026 - FCA expected to publish updated guidance on critical benchmarks and implement SABR refinements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Significant scope reduction eases burdens but introduces transition risks, new FCA rules, and designation uncertainty; firms must act now on consultation (post-Dec 2025) and prep for 2026 FCA changes to avoid non-compliance during shift, especially with 1 Jan 2026 milestone amplifying competitiveness pressures.
Asset ManagerBankBroker Dealer Index-linked treasury stocks are gilts issued by the UK Government. They pay out twice a year, with the amount indexed to the Retail Prices Index.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
We’re seeking feedback on whether tailored market risk rules for non-bank trading firms could remove unnecessary barriers, free up capital and attract new market participants, ultimately supporting economic growth. The rules in place today were originally designed for banks to ensure they held enough capital to absorb major trading losses and protect depositors.While that approach is sensible, it means non-bank trading firms face the same standards even though the potential harm from their fa...
Broker DealerHedge Fund
An update on our investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP. On 4 May 2021, we announced that we had opened an investigation into the oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited, an appointed representative, by its principal, Mirabella Advisors LLP. Our investigation reviewed the nature, conduct and scope of Mirabella’s business. We did not identify breaches by Mirabella that require further action. The investigation has therefore now closed. Mirabella applied to have its authorisation c...
The FCA has closed its investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP's oversight of its appointed representative (AR), Greensill Capital Securities Limited, finding no breaches warranting further action. This closure, announced after reviewing Mirabella's business nature, conduct, and scope, signals effective AR oversight in this high-profile case tied to the Greensill collapse, while Mirabella voluntarily cancelled its authorisation effective 12 September 2025. It matters for compliance professionals as it reinforces FCA expectations on principal-AR relationships without imposing new penalties or rules, but underscores ongoing scrutiny in trade finance and supply chain finance sectors.
What Changed
There are no new regulatory changes, requirements, or rules introduced by this publication. The statement solely announces the closure of an existing investigation with no identified breaches by Mirabella, maintaining the status quo on AR oversight obligations under FCA rules such as SUP 12 (Appointed Representatives). The FCA reserves the right to reopen if new information emerges, but no policy shifts or guidance updates are provided.
Key Dates
4 May 2021 - FCA announced opening of investigation into Mirabella's oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited as AR.
12 September 2025 - Mirabella's authorisation cancelled; firm no longer provides financial services.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a positive closure with no findings of misconduct, new rules, or enforcement, reducing immediate compliance burdens. It matters indirectly by exemplifying robust AR oversight meeting FCA standards amid Greensill fallout, offering reassurance for similar firms while signaling continued vigilance (e.g., potential reopening). Compliance teams should note it for precedent in AR due diligence but prioritize higher-risk areas like ongoing FCA trade finance financial crime probes.
Asset ManagerBroker DealerAll Firms
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
Given at the ISDA Conference on Trading Book Capital
BankBroker Dealer
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
The Bank of England's Statistical Notice 2025/05 requires all reporting institutions to confirm their confidentiality permissions for publishing aggregate statistical data during the 2026 reporting year. This mandatory review streamlines data publication processes by seeking prior consent for aggregate data where firms are among fewer than three contributors, reducing administrative burden while maintaining data integrity.
What Changed
The notice introduces a streamlined confidentiality permission framework with four consent options for reporting institutions:
1. Blanket consent – Give prior approval for all statistical forms
2. Form-by-form consent – Approve permissions on individual forms
3. Selective consent – Approve all forms except specified data points
4. Case-by-case opt-out – Require explicit consent for each publication instance
The material change is the Bank's shift toward pre-approval for aggregate data publication where firms represent fewer than three contributors to an aggregate figure.
What You Need To Do
- *Log into the BEEDS portal and access the confidentiality permission survey
- *Select one of four consent options (blanket, form-by-form, selective, or case-by-case)
- *For multi-entity groups
- *Review prepopulated firm information and make adjustments as needed
- *Submit final preferences via the portal (latest submission version is treated as final)
Key Dates
19 December 2025, 5:00 PM GMT – Deadline for completing confidentiality preference survey in BEEDS portal DEADLINE
January–December 2026 – Reporting reference periods covered by granted permissions
Ongoing – Consent remains valid for these periods unless explicitly withdrawn; applies to resubmissions and late submissions for 2026 reference periods
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankAll Firms
Policy statement 23/25
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-centrally cleared derivatives contracts.
Third-country alignment: UK firms can adopt another...
What You Need To Do
- Assess cross-border transactions
- Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
- Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
- For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025 PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025 FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025 HMT deems approval of PRA’s instrument.
24 September 2025 HMT deems approval of FCA’s instrument.
27 November 2025 Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary equity options relief approaching 4 January 2026. Impacts cost savings but requires swift policy recalibration for ongoing UK EMIR adherence.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
The Bank of England welcomes the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recognition of the 2024 versions of the FX Global Code and UK Money Markets Code under its code recognition scheme.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
This was the first meeting of the Market Participants Group (MPG), a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
Given at AFME's 20th Annual European Government Bond Conference
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
Exchange of letters between the Governor and the Chancellor
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bank’s administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Elaborates on points made at the market panel of the ECB Conference on Money Markets 2025
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
This Market Notice confirms that the previously announced increase to the minimum spread over Bank Rate on bids against Level A collateral in the Indexed Long-Term Repo (ILTR) operation will take effect from 17 November 2025.
BankBroker Dealer
Policy statement 19/25
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
What Changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
*Securitisation Requirements**
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expectations to SS9/13
*Level of Application of CRR Requirements**
Restates rules relating to level of...
What You Need To Do
- *Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
- *Assess securitisation impacts
- *Evaluate mortgage capital treatment
- *Update ECAI mapping processes
- *Establish implementation timeline
Key Dates
28 October 2025 - PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026 - PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026 - Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027 - Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankBroker Dealer
Supervisory statement 31/15
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
What Changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
*ICAAP Requirements**
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligation risk, and foreign currency lending to unhedged retail and SME borrowers
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of capital planning
The management body must be actively involved and engaged in all relevant stages of...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate Compliance Actions
- *Establish ICAAP Framework
- *Risk Identification and Assessment
- *Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
- Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
Key Dates
29 July 2015 - SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026 - Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing - Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rules DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency Rating: HIGH
BankBroker Dealer
Statement of policy 8/25
BankAll Firms
Statement of policy 6/25
Bank
Statement of policy 7/25
BankAll Firms
Policy statement 17/25
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
What Changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
*Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission** from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
*Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits** calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the time of permission grant
Limits remain fixed until the next formal variation of MAIA...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
- *Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
- *Develop MAIA policy documenting asset eligibility criteria, governance structure, and risk management approach
- *Establish contingency plans for scenarios where MAIA assets become ineligible
- *Prepare MAIA permission application if pursuing the framework
Key Dates
27 October 2025 - PS17/25 final rules and policy material took effect; firms could begin applying for MAIA permission
31 December 2026 - Implementation deadline for changes to MALIR reporting template DEADLINE
18 weeks after financial year-end - Annual MAIA use report submission deadline (ongoing, annually) DEADLINE
2 months from breach identification - Deadline to rectify breaches to avoid MA benefit reduction DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Insurance
Based on remarks given on the ‘Real World Assets Tokenisation: What Asset Classes Will Work – and Which Won’t’ panel at DC Fintech Week 2025
BankFintechCrypto Exchange
Policy statement 21/25
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from £44,000 variable pay to £660,000 total pay (with variable pay ≤33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferral Rates: Marginal system—40% deferral on first £660,000 of variable remuneration, 60% above;...
What You Need To Do
- Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
- Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
- Embed SMR-linked adjustments
- For dual-regulated firms
- Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025 Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025 Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024 Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accountability risks, and flexibility needing robust justification to avoid supervisory challenge; non-compliance risks enforcement under PRA accountability regimes.
BankAsset ManagerAll Firms
The Securities Lending Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK securities lending market.
Asset ManagerBankBroker Dealer
Policy statement 16/25
PS16/25 is the PRA's policy statement restating firm-facing organisational requirements from the MiFID Org Reg (e.g., outsourcing, record-keeping, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance) into the PRA Rulebook, with no material changes, to align with HMT's revocation of the EU regulation under FSMA 2023. This matters because it ensures continuity of prudential oversight for PRA-authorised firms post-revocation, preventing enforcement gaps in systems and controls while adapting provisions (e.g., supervisory function) to UK governance structures.
What Changed
Restatement of requirements: Provisions from MiFID Org Reg Articles on outsourcing, record-keeping, control procedures, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance are transferred verbatim or with minor clarifications into PRA Rulebook parts (e.g., Risk Control).
Supervisory function adjustment: Following consultation feedback, PRA retained Article 25 provisions but substituted "governing body" for "supervisory function" to fit UK firm structures, preserving board-level oversight without substantive change.
Technical standards update: Minor amendment to algorithmic trading...
What You Need To Do
- Review and map existing MiFID Org Reg compliance processes against restated PRA Rulebook provisions (e
- Confirm governing body oversight aligns with adapted Article 25 requirements; document any adjustments for UK structures
- Update internal references in algorithmic trading governance documents to new rule 2
- Conduct gap analysis and training on minor clarifications; prepare for dual FCA/PRA alignment if applicable
- Monitor HMT commencement order; if delayed, reassess implementation plans
Key Dates
9 October 2025 - PRA publishes PS16/25 with final rules and feedback to CP9/25 consultation.
23 October 2025 - New PRA rules and technical standards come into force, coinciding with HMT's anticipated revocation of MiFID Org Reg via commencement order (FCA rules align on same date).
Prior to 23 October 2025 - HMT expected to lay second Statutory Instrument revoking remaining MiFID Org Reg provisions; PRA may delay/revoke rules if not made.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act promptly as rules take effect on 23 October 2025 (past deadline as of current date), with no transition period; non-compliance risks enforcement gaps in core systems/controls post-revocation. Impact is low for substance (restatement only) but requires documentation updates to avoid supervisory scrutiny, especially for governance and outsourcing.
BankBroker DealerAll Firms
Given at AFME OPTIC Conference, Amsterdam
BankFintechCrypto Exchange
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Legal Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations Sub-Committee. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
BankBroker DealerPayment Provider
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Given at the Klaas Knot Farewell Symposium
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Consultation paper 21/25
The PRA's CP21/25 proposes deletion of 37 banking regulatory reporting templates—primarily 34 FINREP templates representing approximately one-third of all FINREP collections—as the first phase of its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme. This initiative aims to reduce annual reporting burden by approximately £26 million while maintaining supervisory effectiveness by eliminating duplicative, outdated, or low-value data collections.
What Changed
The PRA proposes the following regulatory deletions:
*FINREP Template Deletions:**
Permanent deletion of 34 whole FINREP reporting templates (approximately one-third of all FINREP collections)
Consolidation of remaining FINREP requirements within a single section of the PRA Rulebook
Clarification of scoping conditions where current provisions are unclear, duplicative, or inconsistently applied
Alignment of reporting remittance dates for FINREP reporting
*Other Template Deletions:**
Two COREP templates: C05.01 (Transitional Provisions) and C05.02 (Grandfathered Instruments)
PRA109...
What You Need To Do
- *Cease reporting on the 37 deleted templates effective 31 December 2025
- *Update internal systems and processes to remove validation rules and submission workflows for deleted templates
- *Revise compliance calendars to reflect aligned FINREP reporting remittance dates
- *Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations to identify any continued requirements based on deleted FINREP templates and assess whether disclosure obligations remain despite template deletion
- *Implement rulebook changes reflecting consolidation of FINREP scoping provisions into the PRA Rulebook
Key Dates
September 2025 - CP21/25 consultation paper published
31 December 2025 - Proposed implementation date to avoid firms submitting 2025 Q4 data for deleted templates
8 December 2025 - PS27/25 (Policy Statement) published, confirming final policy
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Bank
Given at the 30th Annual Bank of America Financials CEO Conference
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Given at the 15th annual edition of City Week
BankFintechPayment Provider
Given at the Centre for Central Banking Studies 'Transforming monetary policy’ conference
BankBroker DealerCrypto Exchange
Given at FIA International Derivative Expo
BankBroker DealerCrypto Exchange
Given at the Global Investment Management summit
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBank