Muzinich Co. Opens Adgm Office To Strengthen Middle East Presence
Asset ManagerBankWealth Manager
Shojin Financial Services Limited (Shojin) is a crowdfunding platform authorised and regulated by the FCA. Shojin allowed customers to make investments that were used to fund loans toward property developments. On 23 March 2026, Shojin went into administration. Simon Carvill-Biggs and Ian Corfield of FRP Trading Advisory Limited were appointed as Joint Administrators.The Joint Administrators are responsible for acting in the best interests of the people who are owed money by Shojin, and they ...
FintechWealth Manager
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has evidence indicating that Walnut Planet GmbH, which has its registered office in Pfäffikon (Schwyz), Switzerland, is offering a capital investment that falls within the definition of “other investments” under section 1 (2) no. 7 of the German Capital Investment Act (Vermögensanlagengesetz - VermAnlG) to the public in Germany. The investment on offer consists of combined lease and service agreements relating to the cultivation of walnuts i...
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBank
Central Bank of Ireland today launched a commemorative coin celebrating the life and work of renowned Irish playwright Seán O'Casey, on what would have been his 146 th birthday. It marks the 100th anniversary of the inaugural performance of his masterpiece The Plough and the Stars at the Abbey Theatre. The silver proof coin will go on sale today (Monday 30 March 2026) at 1pm on www.collectorcoins.ie . Designed by PJ Lynch, there are just 3,000 coins available, and they will retail at €90. Gov...
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
Markets Europe & international Cooperation FMSB signs Consultation Agreement with Autorité des Marchés Financiers
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) and Financial Markets Standards Board (FMSB) have signed a Consultation Agreement to enhance collaboration on developing guidance for wholesale Fixed Income, Currencies, and Commodities (FICC) markets, allowing AMF to provide expertise on FMSB drafts. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals regulatory endorsement of FMSB's non-binding standards, potentially elevating their influence on market conduct expectations in France and Europe, particularly as Paris grows as a trading hub. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/fmsb-signs-consultation-agreement-autorite-des-marches-financiers
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change imposing new rules but a bilateral Consultation Agreement outlining cooperation mechanisms. Key elements include: AMF input on FMSB's annual strategy refresh via discussions with FMSB Chair/CEO; annual high-level oral updates on FMSB strategy progress; operational updates on FMSB workplan/priorities; and AMF's ability to review and challenge draft FMSB guidance materials and publications for wholesale FICC markets. The agreement is non-binding, personal to the parties, and amendable only by mutual written consent, with no third-party rights.
What You Need To Do
- Review and monitor FMSB's 2026 Workplan for upcoming Standards/Statements, noting AMF-influenced drafts (e
- Benchmark internal FICC practices against FMSB guidance, especially vulnerability areas like market structures or conduct
- Engage with FMSB membership or working groups if applicable, to align with emerging standards endorsed by AMF
- Track AMF/FMSB updates for Paris-specific FICC developments
Key Dates
30 March 2026 - Agreement signed and announced, marking effective date of collaboration (today's date). https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/fmsb-signs-consultation-agreement-autorite-des-marches-financiers
Annually (starting 2026) - FMSB provides high-level oral update to AMF on strategy progress.
At least annually (starting 2026) - FMSB Chair/CEO discusses strategy refresh with AMF for input.
Ongoing from 2026 - Operational oral updates on FMSB workplan/priorities as needed. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2026-03/fmsb-amf-accord-2026.pdf
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This agreement introduces no direct obligations, deadlines, or penalties; it fosters indirect influence via enhanced credibility of FMSB's voluntary standards in AMF-regulated markets. It matters for long-term conduct risk management in FICC, as firms ignoring FMSB guidance (now AMF-supported) may face heightened supervisory scrutiny, especially amid Paris's trading growth and AMF's 2026 priorities for resilient markets. https://zoominvest.fr/actualites/patrimoine/amf-des-priorites-2026-axees-sur-l-attractivite-l-innovation-et-la-securite-des-marches/iob24fnqfmfh258iwmxwwicy
Broker DealerBank
A new taskforce will tackle poor handling of motor finance claims by some claims management companies (CMCs) and law firms, after the FCA, Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) and Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) agreed to join up their efforts. The announcement comes as the FCA prepares to set out its final compensation scheme for motor finance customers.The regulators will step up efforts to share intelligence and continue to take co-ordinated ...
BankFintechAll Firms
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
No description available.
Former Venture Egg, Reilly Financial and Interprac adviser Nicholas Hogan banned for four years
Wealth Manager
30 Mar 2026
Read more
BankCrypto ExchangeFintech
At the Life Insurance Association, Singapore (LIA) Annual Luncheon on 30 March 2026, Mr Marcus Lim, Assistant Managing Director, Monetary Authority of Singapore, delivered a keynote speech highlighting three key roles played by insurers.
Insurance
SAMA Licenses “Atyoun Litqniyat AlMalumat WalIttisalat AlMubtakirah” Company to Provide Payment Services
Payment ProviderFintech
The Securities and Exchange Commission today approved an amendment to the National Market System Plan governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (“CAT”) and provided exemptive relief from certain requirements of Rule 17a-1 under the Securities Exchange Act…
Broker DealerAll Firms
No description available.
BankWealth Manager
No description available.
The ECB imposed a €6.2 million penalty on BofA Securities Europe SA for intentionally breaching market risk reporting requirements between 2022 and 2024. The bank systematically underreported risk-weighted assets by including unauthorized sovereign bond option positions in its internal models, resulting in inflated capital ratios and misrepresented financial strength—a "severe" breach that signals the ECB's heightened enforcement focus on reporting accuracy and internal control governance.
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies existing obligations:
Internal Models Scope Limitation: Banks must strictly adhere to supervisory permissions when applying internal models approaches; unauthorized asset classes cannot be included regardless of calculation methodology
Risk-Weighted Asset Accuracy: RWA calculations must reflect actual supervisory permissions, not theoretical modeling capabilities
Capital Ratio Integrity: Misreporting of RWAs directly affects CET1 ratios and capital adequacy disclosures, which are fundamental to...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (for all firms with internal models)
- *Audit Internal Models Scope
- *Verify Sovereign Bond Derivatives Treatment
- *Reconcile RWA Calculations
- *Strengthen Internal Controls
Key Dates
2022-2024 - Period during which BofA Securities Europe SA committed the breach across six consecutive reporting periods
27 March 2026 - ECB penalty announcement and effective date
Ongoing - Bank has the right to challenge the decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union (no statutory deadline specified, but typically within 2 months of notification) DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: CRITICAL
BankBroker Dealer
On 3 March 2026, we said we’d bring forward our planned review of the UK Listing Rules for Investment entities, including how they apply to board independence and related party provisions.Since then, there has been substantial debate over our role in relation to investment trusts, including calls for us to ‘get to grips’ with voting rules ‘that allow a minority shareholder to repeatedly attack an investment trust’.Much of this debate suggests there are misunderstandings about how investment t...
This FCA blog post announces an accelerated review of UK Listing Rules for investment entities, focusing on board independence, related party provisions, conflicts of interest, and shareholder rights amid debates over activist minority shareholders targeting investment trusts. It matters because it clarifies the FCA's limited role (rules apply to issuers, not shareholders), reinforces Companies Act protections, and signals upcoming proposals to ensure rules fit novel scenarios like concentrated ownership, potentially impacting governance and listing compliance for investment trusts.[FCA blog]
What Changed
No immediate regulatory changes or new requirements are introduced; this is a consultation precursor outlining a planned review. The review will assess:
Application of Listing Rules to board independence and related party transactions for investment entities.
How rules, alongside company law, support shareholder rights, engagement, and conflict management (e.g., protecting against "back door takeovers" by minority activists like Saba).
Proposals will be detailed in a consultation paper, with work completing by end-2026.
What You Need To Do
- Monitor and engage
- Review governance
- Enhance shareholder engagement
- Conflict checks
Key Dates
3 March 2026 - FCA announces acceleration of planned Listing Rules review for investment entities.[FCA blog]
End of 2026 - FCA to complete review and publish consultation paper with proposals.[FCA blog]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This signals future changes via consultation but imposes no immediate obligations; however, it heightens scrutiny on investment trust governance amid activist pressures, risking enforcement if conflicts or independence lapses occur pre-review. Matters for compliance teams to audit current setups against Listing Rules and Companies Act, avoiding missteps in high-profile cases like Saba campaigns, while preparing for end-2026 proposals that could tighten related party and board rules.[FCA blog]
Asset ManagerAll Firms
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Liste der sanktionierten natürlichen Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08), publiziert.
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
Postponement of the rollout for Commodity Derivatives Weekly Position Reporting 27 March 2026 Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is postponing the rollout of the new solution for Commodity Derivatives Weekly Position Reporting, originally scheduled for 1 April 2026. The decision follows the identification of issues during the final testing phase, which require further corrective actions to ensure system stability ...
Broker DealerAll Firms
ESAs spring risk update highlights geopolitical pressures and rising private finance risks 27 March 2026 Joint Committee Risk monitoring The European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA – the ESAs) today published their spring 2026 Joint Committee update on risks and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system. The update focuses on the challenges arising from ongoing geopolitical tensions and developments in private finance. Geopolitical tensions continue to pose significant risks Th...
BankAsset ManagerInsurance
The Central Bank Commission has appointed Elizabeth Mahon as Secretary of the Central Bank, effective 30 March. Elizabeth has also been appointed to the role of Head of Governance in the Central Bank. Elizabeth has more than 20 years' experience in financial services, principally in the banking sector, where her career has focused on strategy and implementation, management consulting, organisational change, and stakeholder management. Since 2022 she has worked at the Central Bank as Head of S...
BankWealth Manager
Asset management Regulatory developments The AMF clarifies its doctrine on several aspects relating to asset management companies
Asset ManagerBank
The FCA has fined Dinosaur Merchant Bank Limited (DMBL) £338,000 for failing to put in place effective systems and controls to detect and report suspicious trading in its contracts for difference (CFD) business. CFDs are sophisticated financial products that are used to speculate on various assets going up or down in value. Given their high-risk nature, firms must have strong and reliable surveillance arrangements to prevent insider dealing and market manipulation.In June 2024, DMBL introduce...
BankBroker Dealer
As part of ongoing improvements to My FCA, and following the successful removal of RegData sign in at the end of last year, we have now removed direct access to Connect and the Online Invoicing System. Firms do not need to take any action. All existing RegData, Connect and Online Invoicing links and bookmarked pages will now automatically redirect to My FCA, where you can access all systems from a single homepage without signing in again. This makes managing your regulatory tasks quicker and ...
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
Governor Gabriel Makhlouf of the Central Bank of Ireland today emphasised the critical need to strengthen Europe’s Single Market as the foundation for mobilising the continent’s substantial savings in an increasingly fragmented global environment.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
In his remarks, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf emphasised that Europe must mobilise its substantial savings by strengthening economic growth, completing the Single Market, and building more integrated capital markets, as capital currently flows abroad due to perceived higher returns elsewhere. He argued that central banks must anchor price stability and financial stability as preconditions for effective capital allocation, and that by addressing these fundamentals, European savings will naturally ...
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
Naperte Designated Activity Company (CLONE) - Central Bank of Ireland issues warning about unauthorised firm
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
TD ICAV (CLONES) - Central Bank of Ireland Issues Warning on Unauthorised Firm
Asset ManagerWealth Manager
Castleforbes Wealth (CLONE)– Central Bank of Ireland issues warning about unauthorised firm
Wealth Manager
Long term investment Shares ETF Retail investors Journalists The stock market attracted a record number of retail investors in 2025
Asset ManagerBroker DealerWealth Manager
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the websites renvio(.)icu and renvio(.)pro. BaFin has information that these websites are being used to offer financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
BankFintechCrypto Exchange
The Bank is today announcing a simplification and reduction in the Discount Window Facility (DWF) pricing, as part of its previously announced review of the DWF.
BankWealth ManagerAsset Manager
ASIC applies to wind up 12 companies associated with NSW accountant and former solicitor Christopher Malcolm Edwards
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBank
Binance Australia Derivatives ordered to pay $10 million penalty for onboarding failures causing millions in client trading losses
Crypto Exchange
On 10 March 2026, BaFin imposed an administrative fine amounting to €1,650,000 on Barclays PLC. The reason for this fine was a breach of supervisory duties in connection with contraventions of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz - WpHG). Between June 2022 and March 2023, Barclays PLC failed in 26 cases to submit voting rights notifications regarding a single issuer within the prescribed period.
BaFin imposed a €1.65 million administrative fine on Barclays PLC on March 10, 2026, for failing to submit 26 voting rights notifications within the required four-trading-day deadline between June 2022 and March 2023. This enforcement action demonstrates BaFin's commitment to enforcing transparency requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG) and highlights the critical importance of robust internal controls for voting rights notification compliance.
What Changed
The enforcement action does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies BaFin's enforcement posture regarding existing obligations under sections 33 et seq. of the WpHG. The key regulatory framework remains:
Notification thresholds: Shareholders must notify when voting rights reach, exceed, or fall below 3%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, 30%, 50%, or 75%
Notification timeline: Notifications must be submitted to both the issuer and BaFin within four trading days of the threshold event
Scope expansion: Notifications apply to direct share holdings and certain financial instruments...
What You Need To Do
- *Audit existing processes
- *Strengthen monitoring systems
- *Enhance organizational controls
- *Verify submission records
- *Train relevant personnel
Key Dates
June 2022 – March 2023 Period during which Barclays failed to submit 26 notifications
Four trading days Maximum period to submit notifications after threshold event occurs
March 10, 2026 Date BaFin imposed the €1.65 million fine
March 27, 2026 Publication date of BaFin enforcement announcement
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Broker DealerAsset ManagerBank
No description available.
Broker DealerAsset Manager
MAS and the Singapore Bullion Market Association (SBMA) set out key focus areas to strengthen Singapore’s position as a trusted gold trading centre serving the Asia-Pacific region. This will meet the growing interest among investors to vault and trade gold in Singapore. The key focus areas were developed by a Gold Market Development Working Group that MAS and SBMA established in January 2026, building on detailed discussions and studies with industry participants in 2025.
BankWealth ManagerFamily Office
Given at the Exante Data 10 Year Anniversary Conference, New York
BankWealth ManagerFintech
SAMA Commences Licensing of Fintech Companies to Provide Open Banking Services
FintechBankPayment Provider
SAMA Licenses “Altknwlwjya aljadydh llhulul albrmjyh” and “lyn tknwlwjyz Company Saudi Arabia litqniyat nuzum almaelumat” to Provide Open Banking Services
FintechPayment Provider
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 31 March 2026
Circular CSSF-CPDI 26/50 mandates a recurring annual survey on the amount of **covered deposits** held as of **31 March 2026** by specified Luxembourg credit institutions, to support the Fonds de garantie des dépôts Luxembourg (FGDL) in meeting Deposit Guarantee Scheme (DGS) requirements under the 2015 Law and DGSD. This matters for compliance as it ensures institutions contribute accurately to the FGDL's buffer (targeting 2% of covered deposits by 2026), with data also feeding into Single Resolution Board (SRB) calculations for resolution funding.
What Changed
This circular introduces no substantive changes to survey content, methodology, or reporting specifications compared to prior issuances (e.g., CSSF-CPDI 25/49 for 31 December 2025). Updates are limited to the reference date (31 March 2026) and associated deadlines, maintaining the risk-based ex-ante contribution method from Circular CSSF-CPDI 20/21 and quarterly reporting under CSSF-CPDI 17/07.
What You Need To Do
- Compile data on covered deposits (eligible deposits up to €100,000 per depositor, per Article 163 of 2015 Law), excluding items per Article 172 (e
- Report detailed breakdowns
- Submit via specified format (per attached specs, unchanged from priors) to CPDI by deadline; quarterly data ongoing per CSSF-CPDI 17/07
- Ensure alignment with FGDL contributions under CSSF-CPDI 25/48
Key Dates
31 March 2026 - Reference date for snapshot of covered deposits.
30 April 2026 (inferred from pattern in prior circulars like 25/49) - Likely submission deadline for survey data to CPDI (exact date in full PDF; aligns with one-month post-reference in predecessors). DEADLINE
26 March 2026 ).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate action required today (publication date) to prepare for 31 March 2026 snapshot (just 5 days away), with submission likely due early May 2026. Non-compliance risks FGDL penalties, inaccurate contributions (impacting 0.8% extra buffer to 2% DGSD minimum), and SRB reporting failures under Regulation (EU) 2015/63; recurring nature demands robust quarterly data processes.
Bank
Crypto-assets MiCA Crypto-assets: The AMF applies ESMA guidelines on the knowledge and competence of staff of crypto-asset service providers under MiCA
Crypto ExchangeFintech
We sympathise with former members of the British Steel Pension Scheme (BSPS) who lost money after they were given unsuitable advice from people they trusted. Complaints are a valuable source of feedback which help us improve and learn. There have also been 4 independent reports into the BSPS since 2018, which have helped us learn lessons. We have accepted several of their recommendations and implemented improvements, including those below.We now have much closer collaboration between the FCA,...
The FCA's response to the Complaint Commissioner's report on the British Steel Pension Scheme addresses systemic failures in pension transfer advice that affected approximately 7,700 members, with 47% receiving unsuitable advice. This statement demonstrates the FCA's acknowledgment of regulatory shortcomings and outlines remedial measures implemented to prevent similar harm, including enhanced inter-agency collaboration, stricter product governance rules, and a £106 million redress scheme now benefiting 1,870 affected members.
What Changed
The FCA has implemented the following regulatory and operational changes in response to BSPS failures:
Enhanced inter-agency collaboration: Closer coordination between the FCA, The Pensions Regulator, Pension Protection Fund, and Money and Pensions Service to improve intelligence sharing on defined benefit (DB) pension transfer risks
Data collection and monitoring: Expanded collection of pension transfer data from advisory firms to proactively identify emerging risks and market trends
Contingent charging ban: Prohibition of contingent charging arrangements for DB pension transfers to...
What You Need To Do
- *For firms that provided DB pension transfer advice:
- *Conduct retrospective suitability reviews of all DB pension transfer advice provided, particularly during 2015-2018, identifying unsuitable recommendations
- *Calculate and pay redress to affected customers to restore them to their pre-transfer financial position, with reference to the FSCS redress methodology
- *Implement enhanced governance for DB pension transfer advice, including:
- Documented suitability assessments with clear rationale
Key Dates
Late 2017 - FCA received initial intelligence about poor pension transfer advice quality
December 2018 - FCA published initial findings showing less than 50% of reviewed advice was suitable
May 2020 - FCA directed 45 firms to conduct suitability assessments (Past Business Reviews)
April 2022 - FCA imposed asset retention rules for DB pension transfers
April 2023 - BSPS redress scheme formally introduced, requiring firms to review advice suitability and pay redress
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Wealth ManagerAsset ManagerAll Firms
On 25 March 2026, following a petition filed by the FCA, the High Court ordered that Equity for Growth (Securities) Limited (EFG) be wound up. EFG is a corporate finance firm. EFG was also a principal for a number of appointed representatives between 2015 and 2020, including Amyma Ltd and Osborne Baldwin Ltd, which traded as Hunter Jones.An appointed representative carries on regulated activity under the responsibility of an authorised firm, known as 'the principal'. Find more information on ...
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBroker Dealer
West Invest Bank - Central Bank of Ireland Issues Warning on Unauthorised Firm
Bank
Walsh Trust Bank - Central Bank of Ireland Issues Warning on Unauthorised Firm
Bank
No description available.
BankWealth ManagerFintech
We have set out plans for using AI to speed up authorisations, testing new tools to identify key risks earlier, with our people remaining at the heart of decision-making. The new authorisation tool is being developed internally and will be integrated into existing FCA systems.It forms part of our annual work programme 2026/27, which lays out how we’re accelerating our ambition to be a smarter, more data-driven regulator.We will also use generative AI to support our efforts to modernise regula...
BankWealth ManagerFintech
The Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority have finalised a package of changes to firms’ resolution reporting and disclosure requirements which reduces the burden of regulation while maintaining a robust and credible regime that supports growth and competition.
BankWealth Manager
Supervisory Statement 9/17
**SS9/17 - Recovery Planning** is the PRA's supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK banks, building societies, and designated investment firms must prepare and maintain recovery plans to ensure financial stability during periods of stress. This guidance supersedes the previous SS18/13 and represents a substantial tightening of recovery planning requirements, making credible, testable, and executable recovery plans a core component of prudential regulation rather than a compliance checkbox.
What Changed
SS9/17 introduced several material enhancements to recovery planning requirements:
*Governance and Integration**: Recovery planning must be embedded within firms' risk management frameworks, with board-level oversight and integration with stress testing and ICAAP processes. The PRA expects clear governance documentation showing how plans are produced, reviewed, signed off, and implemented.
*Fire Drill Exercises**: Firms must conduct regular fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios in a live environment, testing governance arrangements, management information systems, and the...
What You Need To Do
- *Develop comprehensive recovery plans containing all minimum elements specified in the Recovery Planning Part of the PRA Rulebook and detailed in SS9/17
- *Establish governance frameworks documenting how recovery plans are produced, reviewed, approved by the board, and how recovery options would be implemented
- *Conduct fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios, test governance arrangements, and validate management information capabilities
- *Create implementation playbooks (for complex plans) that enable rapid execution by senior management during stress
- *Perform detailed impact analysis for each recovery option, quantifying capital and liquidity impacts with realistic timelines
Key Dates
11 December 2017 - SS9/17 first published and became effective
21 September 2017 - PRA consultation deadline for CP9/17 (the consultation paper preceding this statement) DEADLINE
Second half of 2017 - Proposed implementation date for superseding SS18/13 (achieved with December 2017 publication)
Ongoing - Firms must maintain and test recovery plans continuously; the PRA notes this statement "may be revised as recovery planning becomes further embedded in firms' risk management practices" DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankAll Firms
Policy statement 10/26
PS10/26 finalizes PRA proposals to raise the Resolution Assessment threshold from £50 billion to £100 billion in retail deposits and reduce recovery plan review frequency for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) from annually to biennially, enhancing proportionality in resolution and recovery frameworks post-financial crisis. These changes reduce regulatory burden on smaller firms while maintaining safety and soundness, directly supporting PRA objectives of competitiveness and growth. Compliance teams must assess scope changes immediately to align reporting and planning cycles.
What Changed
Resolution Assessment Threshold: Increased from £50 billion to £100 billion in retail deposits, limiting reporting and disclosure requirements under the Resolution Assessment Part of the PRA Rulebook to only the largest firms posing systemic risks.
Recovery Plans Review Frequency: For SDDTs and SDDT consolidation entities, reduced from at least annually to at least every two years, aiming for higher quality plans with less frequent reviews.
Rulebook and Guidance Updates: Amendments to Resolution Assessment Part (Appendix 2), Recovery Plans Part (Appendix 3), and Supervisory Statement SS9/17 –...
What You Need To Do
- Scope Assessment
- Recovery Plans
- Reporting/Disclosure
Key Dates
1 April 2026 - Effective date for PS10/26 changes, including new £100bn threshold and biennial recovery plan reviews for SDDTs .
2 October 2026 - Expected submission date for first Resolution Assessment reports for in-scope firms (as previously communicated by PRA) .
11 June 2027 - Expected publication date for first disclosures under amended threshold .
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 April 2026 (imminent from March 2026), with first reports due 2 October 2026; firms between £50-100bn retail deposits gain immediate burden relief (exiting scope), while largest firms face no new burdens but must confirm ongoing compliance. Matters due to proportionality aligning with PRA growth objectives, reducing costs for mid-tier banks/building societies amid economic pressures, but requires swift deposit recalibration to avoid inadvertent non-compliance.
Bank
Policy statement 11/26
PS11/26 finalizes PRA rules enhancing Pillar 3 disclosures on resolvability resources (MREL), capital distribution constraints (CDCs), and disclosure basis for UK banks and building societies. It matters because it standardizes information to boost market discipline, user comparability, and confidence in orderly resolution, directly impacting financial stability and compliance reporting. No substantive changes from CP16/25 consultation, with minor clarifications only.
What Changed
Standardized MREL disclosure templates: Replaces free-form disclosures with four new templates aligned to Basel BCBS TLAC formats (adapted for UK), expanding scope to more firms for consistency on MREL adequacy.
Qualitative CDC narrative: Added to UK CC1 template for firms subject to CDCs, enabling market assessment of restriction impacts; removes obsolete Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB) disclosure post-O-SII buffer replacement.
Disclosure basis statement: Firms must specify their Pillar 3 regime (e.g., resolution entity, O-SII, large institution), frequency, and details like reference date,...
What You Need To Do
- Update Pillar 3 processes to use new MREL templates (Annex XXVII instructions), UK CC1 with CDC narrative, and basis statement (e
- For CDC-subject firms
- Ensure semi-annual disclosure of key metrics (Article 447 points a-g) where required
- Integrate into consolidated reporting for UK parents; test templates/instructions from appendices
- Review for alignment with broader CRR changes (e
Key Dates
17 March 2026 - PS11/26 and accompanying rule instruments (e.g., Disclosure (CRR) Instrument 2026) published.
1 January 2027 - Policy effective date; rules apply from this date.
H1 2027 - First disclosures under new policy published, covering period ending **31 December 2026** (annual/semi-annual as applicable).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 January 2027 requires immediate template/system updates for H1 2027 disclosures (year-end 2026 data), with standardized formats limiting flexibility and raising non-compliance risks to market discipline objectives. Impacts reporting teams, resolution planning, and investor relations; proportional design minimizes burden but demands proactive gap analysis given no transition grace beyond effective date.
BankBroker DealerAll Firms
Policy statement 9/26
PS9/26 finalizes targeted amendments to MREL reporting templates, including changes to MRL001 and MRL003 data elements and the deletion of MRL002, reducing reporting burdens while maintaining resolution planning oversight. This matters for compliance teams as it streamlines processes under the PRA's Future Banking Data programme, with implementation from 1 January 2027, enabling firms to reallocate resources efficiently.
What Changed
Amendments to data elements in the MREL resources template (MRL001) and MREL debt template (MRL003), with full deletion of the MREL resources forecast template (MRL002).
Consequential updates to reporting instructions (Appendix 2) and Supervisory Statement SS19/13 (Appendix 3), including relocation of instrument scope descriptions to reporting instructions for clarity.
No changes to quarterly reporting frequency for MRL001/MRL003, despite industry requests for semi-annual alignment, to ensure monitoring of loss-absorbing capacity.
PRA to publish updated reporting taxonomy shortly.
What You Need To Do
- Review and update internal reporting systems to incorporate revised MRL001/MRL003 templates and deleted MRL002 by 1 January 2027
- Implement updated reporting instructions and SS19/13 amendments, including clarified scope of instruments in MRL templates
- Prepare for Q4 2026 data submission in February 2027 using new taxonomy (to be published shortly by PRA)
- For firms with deleted COREP13 templates, cease submissions from April 2026 cycle
- Conduct gap analysis against SS19/13 changes and test processes for quarterly MREL reporting continuity
Key Dates
1 January 2027 - Revised MRL001 and MRL003 templates effective; first submissions of 2026 Q4 data (ending 31 December 2026) due in **February 2027**. DEADLINE
1 April 2026 - Partial revocation of UKTS 2018/1624 (COREP13), deleting certain templates ahead of April 2026 cycle for period ending 31 December 2025.
1 April 2026 - PS10/26 effective (related: Resolution Assessment threshold amendments, reports due 2 October 2026). DEADLINE
1 January 2027 - PS11/26 effective (related: disclosures from 2027 H1 for period ending 31 December 2026).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Changes reduce burden (net simplification, ~25% per industry feedback) but require system updates before 1 January 2027 submissions; non-compliance risks resolution planning scrutiny, though lead time mitigates immediate pressure. Matters for maintaining accurate MREL monitoring amid PRA's FBD efficiency drive.
Bank
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
On 4 March 2026, BaFin imposed an administrative fine amounting to 180,000 euros on Schaeffler AG on the grounds that the company had violated the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). The fact that financial results for the first quarter of 2024 deviated significantly from market expectations should, as insider information, have been made transparent by the company without delay.
BaFin imposed a €180,000 administrative fine on Schaeffler AG on 4 March 2026 for violating Article 17(1) of the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) by failing to promptly disclose insider information about Q1 2024 financial results that significantly deviated from market expectations. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's strict enforcement of ad hoc disclosure obligations for listed companies, serving as a reminder that delays in publishing inside information can lead to substantial penalties and undermine market integrity. Compliance teams must prioritize robust inside information monitoring to avoid similar sanctions, as fines can reach up to €2.5 million or 2% of total revenue.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement case reaffirming existing MAR requirements under Article 17(1), first subparagraph, which mandates immediate public disclosure of inside information. Inside information is defined as precise, non-public information relating to issuers or financial instruments that, if made public, would likely significantly affect prices. Significant deviations from market expectations in financial results qualify as such, requiring disclosure without delay to prevent insider trading advantages and ensure informed investor decisions.
What You Need To Do
- Strengthen ad hoc disclosure protocols
- Conduct internal audits and training
- Scenario testing
- Monitor BaFin enforcement trends
Key Dates
Q1 2024 (exact date unspecified) - Schaeffler AG's financial results deviated significantly from market expectations, triggering ad hoc disclosure obligation.
4 March 2026 - BaFin imposed the €180,000 administrative fine on Schaeffler AG for MAR violation.
26 March 2026 - BaFin publicly announced the enforcement action.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This enforcement reaffirms longstanding MAR obligations rather than introducing new rules, but it signals BaFin's active use of fines (up to €2.5M or 2% revenue) for disclosure delays, particularly relevant for earnings seasons. It matters for listed firms as it demonstrates low tolerance for lapses in volatile markets, potentially increasing supervisory scrutiny and reputational risk; non-compliance erodes investor trust and exposes firms to appeals processes or escalated penalties.
All Firms
Renewed surge in international energy prices tests domestic economic resilience Higher oil and gas prices are expected to lead to lower growth and higher inflation than previously expected. The extent is dependent on the duration of the conflict and the scale of damage to critical infrastructure in the Middle East. MDD is forecast to grow by 2.8 per cent per annum on average from 2026 to 2028 in the baseline forecast, with inflation averaging 2.5 per cent per annum over that period. More seve...
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
Superintendent Routledge to participate in virtual fireside chat at Bank of America Expert Insights Series on March 30, 2026
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
Amendment of Circular CSSF 18/703 on the introduction of a semi-annual reporting of borrower related residential real estate indicators
Circular CSSF 26/908 amends Circular CSSF 18/703 to update semi-annual reporting requirements for borrower-related residential real estate indicators, enhancing supervisory oversight of credit risk in Luxembourg's financial sector. Published today (25 March 2026), it matters for credit institutions as it refines data collection to better monitor real estate lending exposures amid potential market vulnerabilities.
What Changed
The circular introduces amendments to the original Circular CSSF 18/703 (itself amended by Circulars CSSF 20/737 and 21/772), focusing on semi-annual reporting of indicators tied to borrowers in residential real estate. Specific changes are not detailed in the provided summary or full content excerpt, but they likely involve refinements to reporting templates, data granularity, or submission processes to align with evolving EU prudential standards on real estate risk monitoring. The updated consolidated version of Circular CSSF 18/703 is now available as a 258.91Kb PDF.
What You Need To Do
- Download and review the full Circular CSSF 26/908 (291
- Conduct a gap analysis of current reporting processes against the amended requirements for borrower-related residential real estate indicators
- Update internal systems, data collection templates, and reporting workflows to ensure accurate semi-annual submissions to the CSSF
- Train relevant compliance, risk, and finance teams on changes; document compliance confirmations for audit trails
Key Dates
17 December 2018 - Original issuance of Circular CSSF 18/703 introducing semi-annual reporting.
25 March 2026 - Publication date of Circular CSSF 26/908 (today).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a targeted amendment to existing reporting obligations rather than a new regime, reducing immediate disruption, but non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny, fines, or enhanced monitoring given CSSF's focus on real estate risk. It matters for maintaining accurate credit risk data, especially in a potentially volatile residential property market, supporting broader prudential stability.
Bank
No description available.
All Firms
More people could access financial advice, under proposals set out by FCA. The FCA is consulting on how to make it easier for firms to give more simplified forms of individualised financial advice to consumers.Simplified forms of advice can help consumers with more straightforward needs and do not require a full assessment of all their financial circumstances, making it more accessible and affordable.Sarah Pritchard, deputy chief executive of the FCA, said:'For too long the support people nee...
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBank
No description available.
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
No description available.
BankBroker DealerAsset Manager Version of 9 March 2026
The CSSF Technical FAQ on Regulation No 20-08 provides implementation guidance on **loan-to-value (LTV) limits for residential real estate credit in Luxembourg**, establishing borrower-based macroprudential measures designed to limit leverage in the mortgage market. This guidance is critical for lenders operating in Luxembourg as it clarifies how to calculate own funds, determine LTV compliance, and apply temporary portfolio exemptions that have been extended through June 30, 2025.
What Changed
The most recent update (March 9, 2026) to the Technical FAQ reflects the regulatory framework established by CSSF Regulation No 20-08 (as modified by Regulation No 24-10). The core LTV requirements are:
*Primary Residence Loans:
First-time buyers: LTV limit of up to 100%
Other buyers**: LTV limit of 90%, implemented via portfolio allowance
*Buy-to-Let Residential Loans:**
Standard LTV limit of 80%
Temporary exemption (until June 30, 2025): Lenders may apply LTV ratios up to 95% for up to 10% of annual production
*Other Residential Real Estate Loans:**
LTV limit of 80%
*Own Funds...
What You Need To Do
- *For all lenders
- *Implement dual LTV tracking for borrowers financing new property through sale of existing property, ensuring compliance with both interim and final LTV ratios
- *Document own funds sources carefully, particularly when cash collateral or sale proceeds are used, as these are only permitted for loans with initial LTV below 100%
- *Prepare for June 30, 2025 transition by
- Identifying all buy-to-let loans currently benefiting from the 95% LTV exemption
Key Dates
January 1, 2021 - Regulation and LTV limits became effective for residential real estate credit on Luxembourg territory
December 3, 2020 - CSSF Regulation No 20-08 originally published
May 21, 2024 - CSSF Regulation No 24-04 introduced temporary adjustments to LTV limits
December 30, 2024 - CSSF Regulation No 24-10 extended temporary adjustments
June 30, 2025 - **CRITICAL DEADLINE**: Temporary portfolio allowance for buy-to-let loans (95% LTV for 10% of annual production) expires; all buy-to-let loans revert to 80% LTV limit DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
BankFintech
on the introduction of a semi-annual reporting of borrower-related residential real estate indicators
Circular CSSF 18/703 introduces semi-annual reporting requirements for Luxembourg-based lenders on borrower-related residential real estate (RRE) indicators to monitor macroprudential risks in the RRE lending market, in line with ESRB Recommendation 2016/14 (as amended). It matters for compliance because it mandates data collection via a dedicated CSSF template, with exclusions only for banks below EUR 10 million in outstanding RRE exposures, ensuring supervisory oversight of lending standards. The circular has been iteratively amended (CSSF 20/737, 21/772, 26/908), with the latest update on 25 March 2026 refining reporting processes.
What Changed
Original Scope (CSSF 18/703, 17 Dec 2018): Requires semi-annual reporting of RRE indicators for loans secured by Luxembourg residential real estate (existing dwellings, under construction, owner-occupied, buy-to-let, renovation loans via real estate savings plans like BSH/BHW). Excludes commercial real estate (CRE), unsecured renovation loans, and loans to non-natural person entities for property purchase.
Amendment CSSF 20/737 (19 Feb 2020): Clarified reporting thresholds and processes; banks with total outstanding RRE exposure ≤ EUR 10 million are exempt from reporting (no zero report...
What You Need To Do
- Download and use the dedicated RRE data template from the CSSF website (https://www
- Assess total outstanding RRE exposure; if > EUR 10 million, collect data on new/outstanding exposures per reference dates (30 Jun/31 Dec)
- Ensure IT systems store/process RRE indicators (e
- Submit reports to CSSF in April/October; review amendments (20/737, 21/772, 26/908) and FAQ for updates
- For exempt banks
Key Dates
17 Dec 2018 Original Circular CSSF 18/703 published; reporting obligation introduced.
19 Feb 2020 Circular CSSF 20/737 and FAQ published; clarified exemptions and scope.
10 May 2021 Circular CSSF 21/772 amendment published.
25 Mar 2026 Circular CSSF 26/908 amendment published (today's date); immediate implementation expected for upcoming cycles.
Ongoing (semi-annual) Reports due in April (ref. 31 Dec) and October (ref. 30 Jun) each year. DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Ongoing semi-annual obligation with latest amendment today (25 Mar 2026, CSSF 26/908) likely affects the next October 2026 cycle (ref. 30 Jun 2026); non-compliance risks supervisory sanctions, as it supports macroprudential monitoring under ESRB framework. Firms must validate systems/data immediately post-amendment to avoid gaps in reporting population.
Bank
No description available.
Broker DealerAll Firms
SAMA Issues the Updated Oversight Framework of the Payment Systems and Their Operators
Payment ProviderFintech
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
Speech at the National Bank of the Republic of North Macedonia and SUERF conference – Central Banking Amid Persistent Global Shifts: Fostering Stability, Innovation, and Resilience, Skopje
BankWealth ManagerFintech
J.P. Morgan Asset Management (Clone) - Central Bank of Ireland Issues Warning on Unauthorised Firm
Asset ManagerBank
No description available.
FintechCrypto Exchange
Good afternoon and welcome to this Central Bank of Ireland workshop on the Consumer Protection Code. Today I will focus on the outlook for consumers and investors. But first let me pause to talk a little about the broader context in which we find ourselves. We are living through a period marked by extraordinary change, geopolitical instability, rapid technological transformation and shifting economic conditions. Governor Makhlouf summarised this well when he said how 2026 has already seen ext...
Deputy Governor Colm Kincaid's speech on 24 March 2026 emphasizes consumer protection as central to the Central Bank of Ireland's (CBI) mission amid geopolitical, technological, and economic changes, highlighting the revised **Consumer Protection Code 2025** (CPC 2025) as a key modernization effort. This matters for compliance professionals because the CPC 2025 introduces enhanced, digitally-focused protections effective **24 March 2026**, replacing the 2012 Code after a 12-month implementation period, with firms required to proactively secure customer interests.
What Changed
The CPC 2025 comprises Standards for Business Regulations (governance, resources, risk management, conduct standards) and Consumer Protection Regulations (cross-sectoral and sector-specific rules for consumers). Major updates include:
Core obligation: Firms must "secure customers’ interests," shifting to a proactive, customer-focused mindset.
Cross-sectoral requirements: Knowing the consumer/suitability; conflicts of interest/remuneration; vulnerable consumers (updated definition); digitalisation (customer-focused design); effective informing (beyond disclosure); charges/regulatory status...
What You Need To Do
- Gap analysis
- Policy/system updates
- Governance/risk
- Testing/monitoring
- Stakeholder engagement
Key Dates
24 March 2025 - CBI publishes revised CPC 2025, Standards for Business Regulations, Consumer Protection Regulations, and guidance.
24 March 2026 - CPC 2025 takes effect; existing 2012 Code ceases (12-month implementation period ends).
Until 24 March 2026 - 2012 Code (with addenda) remains in force.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With effectiveness today (24 March 2026), firms face immediate non-compliance risk as the 12-month window closes; CBI supervision will intensify on digital/fraud/vulnerability protections amid heightened risks (e.g., cyber, scams). Non-adherence risks enforcement under CBI's powers, reputational damage, and fines, especially as this "gold-plates" EU rules in a volatile environment.
BankInsurancePayment Provider The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has fined The Bank of London Group Limited and Oplyse Holdings Limited (formerly The Bank of London Group Holdings Limited) £2 million for misleading the PRA over their capital positions, failing to act with integrity, failing to be open and cooperative with the regulator and failing to maintain adequate financial resources.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) fined The Bank of London Group Limited and its parent Oplyse Holdings Limited £2 million (reduced from £12 million due to financial hardship) for serious breaches including misleading the regulator with fabricated documents on capital positions, failing to act with integrity, lacking openness, and breaching capital and large exposure rules from October 2021 to May 2024. This marks the PRA's first enforcement for integrity failures and first action against a parent holding company, signaling heightened scrutiny on governance, reporting accuracy, and parent-subsidiary accountability in UK banking. Compliance professionals should note this as a precedent reinforcing zero tolerance for deceptive practices, with potential for escalated penalties absent settlement or hardship claims.
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new rules but enforces existing PRA requirements with landmark application:
First PRA fine for breaching Fundamental Rule 1 (conduct business with integrity), highlighting fabrication of documents as a core violation.
First enforcement against a parent financial holding company (Oplyse Holdings), extending liability to group entities for capital reporting and related party exposures.
Emphasizes strict adherence to Fundamental Rules 3, 4, and 7 (prudence, adequate resources, openness), CRR reporting (e.g., own funds on individual/consolidated basis),...
What You Need To Do
- Conduct capital position audits to verify CRR reporting accuracy (individual and consolidated own funds) and remediate any discrepancies
- Review intra-group exposures for large exposure limits (Articles 393-395), related party transactions (Rules 2
- Stress-test parent-subsidiary interactions and ensure openness with PRA on deteriorating positions
- Update training on PRA enforcement policies (PS1/24) and bank supervision (SS3/21)
Key Dates
7 October 2021 - 22 May 2024 Period of identified breaches, including capital non-compliance, misleading submissions, and large exposure failures. DEADLINE
March 2026 .
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This sets a precedent for integrity-based fines and parent company liability, risking similar actions for any firm with capital misreporting or opaque group dealings; even settled penalties were reduced only due to hardship, indicating PRA's willingness to pursue £12m+ originally. Matters critically for banks/fintechs with complex structures, as it amplifies personal accountability under Senior Managers Regime and erodes trust, potentially triggering closer PRA supervision or prohibitions.
BankFintech
We will set out our approach on motor finance redress shortly after markets close on Monday 30 March, having consulted on a compensation scheme in October 2025.
The FCA is scheduling its announcement on a proposed motor finance redress scheme—addressing historical commission disclosure failures in car loans—for shortly after markets close on Monday, 30 March 2026, following a consultation launched in October 2025. This matters because it signals imminent final rules that could impose up to GBP11 billion in costs on lenders, affecting millions of consumers and requiring urgent operational preparations to ensure timely payouts in 2026.
What Changed
Introduction of a 3-month implementation period for most firms, extendable to 5 months for older motor finance agreements, to handle the scheme's scale and complexity.
Streamlined consumer journey: Pre-scheme complainants no longer need to opt out; lenders must notify them of owed compensation within 3 months post-implementation, with immediate acceptance options available.
Removal of mandatory recorded delivery for customer communications, allowing flexible channels with fraud safeguards.
No final decision yet on proceeding, but likely modifications based on over 1,000 consultation...
What You Need To Do
- Review and prepare systems
- Monitor complaints
- Assess provisions
- Compliance checks
- Stakeholder engagement
Key Dates
October 2025 - Consultation on compensation scheme launched .
30 March 2026 (shortly after markets close) - FCA to publish final rules/approach on motor finance redress .
~June 2026 (3 months post-announcement) - End of standard implementation period; lenders notify consumers of redress .
~August 2026 (5 months for older agreements) - Extended implementation deadline .
~September 2026 (3 months post-implementation) - Consumers informed of compensation amounts .
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With the announcement just 6 days away (as of 24 March 2026), firms have minimal time to finalize preparations amid GBP11 billion cost risks, market disruption warnings, and lender pushback; delays could amplify redress delays, fines, or consumer harm claims.
BankPayment ProviderAll Firms
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website panda-financial.com. BaFin has information that the operators are offering banking business and/or financial services as well as cryptoasset services on this website without the required authorisation. The operators of the website are not supervised by BaFin and have no connection to the licensed institution Bitpanda Financial Services GmbH.
BankCrypto ExchangeFintech
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
No description available.
The SFC has imposed a **lifetime ban and $17.43 million fine** on Lui Pak Tong for orchestrating a scheme where he exploited a fund under his control by directing $22.5 million in unsecured loans to a company he owned, while concealing conflicts of interest and diverting loan proceeds to himself and associates. This enforcement action demonstrates the SFC's aggressive stance on fiduciary breaches, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and self-dealing by licensed representatives, with direct implications for fund governance, investment committee oversight, and compliance with the Code of Conduct.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement precedent establishing the SFC's expectations regarding:
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Licensed representatives must fully disclose all material conflicts of interest to investment committees and fund stakeholders, particularly when recommending transactions involving entities under their control.
Fiduciary Duty Standards: Fund managers and their representatives must ensure fair treatment of fund investors and cannot exploit their position to divert fund assets or loan proceeds to themselves or connected persons.
Investment...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate Actions (0-30 days)
- *Conflict of Interest Audit
- *Policy Review
- Written disclosure of all material conflicts before investment committee meetings
- Independent review and approval of transactions involving conflicted parties
Key Dates
25 July 2017 – 31 August 2020 Period during which Lui held licenses for Types 1, 4, and 9 regulated activities.
September 2017 – June 2020 Period during which the misconduct occurred (five unsecured loans totalling $22.5 million extended to Lui's controlled company).
31 July 2024 Thunder Capital Limited's (later renamed Yupei Fortune Capital Limited) SFC licence was revoked.
24 March 2026 SFC announcement of lifetime ban and $17.43 million fine.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: HIGH
Asset ManagerWealth ManagerBroker Dealer
The Central Bank of Ireland today (Tuesday 24 March 2026) marked the coming into force of the modernised Consumer Protection Code, giving consumers stronger protections when using banks, insurance companies, and other financial services. The modernised Code has been designed to better protect consumers in today’s world, and in anticipation of how financial services will evolve into the future. It follows extensive public consultation and engagement. Deputy Governor Colm Kincaid said: "The Cen...
BankInsuranceAll Firms
No description available.
BankInsurance
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
No description available.
BankWealth ManagerAll Firms
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
No description available.
BankFintech
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns about offers from the website festgeldplan(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the website are offering financial services without the required authorisation. They give the impression that their offers originate from WPV Advisory & Asset Management GmbH & Co. KG, which is supervised by BaFin. It is a case of identity fraud. WPV Advisory & Asset Management GmbH & Co. KG has no connection with the ...
BankWealth ManagerFintech
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the websites wertede(.)com and wertede(.)cc. According to information available to BaFin, the operator is providing financial and investment services on this website without the required authorisation.
BankFintechCrypto Exchange
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
Superintendent Peter Routledge participates in National Bank Annual Conference 2026 fireside chat
BankInsurance
No description available.
BankAsset ManagerInsurance
No description available.
Broker DealerFintechCrypto Exchange
Press release 26/07
Bank
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen der Verordnung vom 4. März 2022 über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) amended Annex 8 of the Ordinance on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) on March 19, 2026, removing 7 natural persons from the sanctions list. This update requires financial intermediaries to immediately review and adjust their sanctions screening processes, as it directly impacts asset freeze obligations and reporting under Swiss sanctions regime.
What Changed
Removal of 7 natural persons from Annex 8, which lists designated individuals subject to asset freezes and other restrictive measures related to the Ukraine situation.
Update to the SESAM sanctions database (SECO Sanctions Management), Switzerland's authoritative list aligned with EU sanctions.
No new designations or additional prohibitions introduced; this is a delisting that narrows the scope of sanctions application.
What You Need To Do
- Screen and release assets
- Update internal systems
- Report to SECO if applicable
- Document changes
Key Dates
March 19, 2026 - WBF amends Annex 8 and publishes the update.
March 20, 2026, 23:00 Uhr - Changes enter into force; sanctions screening and asset handling must reflect delistings immediately thereafter. DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - The delisting reduces sanctions exposure but demands prompt action to unfreeze assets and update controls, as delays could lead to improper asset retention (potential liability) or missed opportunities for clients. Given the effective date was yesterday (March 20, 2026), firms must act today to align with FINMA expectations; non-compliance risks enforcement under administrative law.
BankWealth ManagerPayment Provider
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about WhatsApp groups directing consumers to the MORRISONBOOST platform. In these WhatsApp groups, consumers are encouraged to use the MORRISONBOOST platform to trade in financial instruments. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of conducting banking business and/or offering consumers financial services without the required authorisation. The operators are not supervised by BaFin.
FintechCrypto Exchange
On 3 March 2026, BaFin imposed an administrative fine amounting to €25,000 on a.i.s. AG. The company had contravened obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz - WpHG). It had failed to publish its half-yearly financial report for the financial year 2025.
BaFin imposed a €25,000 administrative fine on a.i.s. AG on 3 March 2026 for failing to publish its half-yearly financial report for FY 2025, violating disclosure obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG). This enforcement action underscores BaFin's strict enforcement of periodic reporting requirements for issuers on organized markets, serving as a reminder that even partial non-compliance (e.g., missing minimum components) triggers penalties, with potential fines up to €10 million or 5% of revenue. Compliance teams must prioritize robust reporting processes to mitigate similar risks.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement precedent under existing WpHG rules. Key requirements reaffirmed include: issuers domiciled in Germany with securities on organized markets must publish half-yearly financial reports within three months after period-end, containing specific minimum components (e.g., net assets, financial position, results, outlook, risks, opportunities)[BaFin publication]. BaFin views omission of any minimum component as full non-publication, warranting fines.
What You Need To Do
- Implement automated monitoring and reminders for half-yearly reporting deadlines, ensuring all minimum components (net assets, financial position, results, outlook, risks/opportunities) are included
- Establish compliance function per WpHG Sections 80/87 and MaComp: conduct risk assessments, maintain documentation, and report to management/BaFin
- For issuers
- Train staff on WpHG disclosure rules, including ad-hoc and periodic obligations, with insider list maintenance and blackout periods
- Reconcile reports for accuracy, as BaFin scrutinizes completeness
Key Dates
3 months after half-year end - Deadline to publish half-yearly financial report (e.g., for H2 2025, by 31 March 2026). DEADLINE
3 March 2026 - Date BaFin imposed €25,000 fine on a.i.s. AG for FY 2025 half-yearly report failure.
23 March 2026 - BaFin publication date of enforcement notice.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to BaFin's zero-tolerance for reporting lapses (even minor omissions), with scalable fines demonstrating enforcement risk amid heightened market abuse surveillance. Low fine here (€25k) signals proportionality for first/small breaches, but precedent warns of escalation; firms with organized market listings face immediate audit exposure.
All Firms
This February 2026 report contains an update of the latest consumer price developments in Singapore, prepared by MAS and the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
BankWealth ManagerAsset Manager
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues. To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
Broker DealerAsset Manager
This Market Notice sets out the schedule for sales in Q2 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
BankAsset ManagerBroker Dealer
In his latest blog Governor Gabriel Makhlouf explains that the Governing Council held rates steady at 2 per cent due to new geopolitical uncertainty from Middle East tensions, which risk pushing energy prices and headline inflation above the 2 per cent target whilst dampening growth. The Bank will monitor inflation expectations and wage dynamics closely to prevent the energy shock from becoming embedded in persistent above-target inflation, as occurred after the Ukraine crisis.
BankAsset ManagerWealth Manager
We are reminding regulated firms they need to undertake proper checks when dealing with unregulated lenders, safe custody providers, money brokers and financial leasing companies – also known as 'Annex 1' firms. There are around 1,200 of these firms registered with us for solely anti-money laundering purposes. Our powers are currently limited to looking at how these firms are meeting their anti-money laundering obligations and they are not subject to our wider rulebook. This regime is based o...
The FCA statement reminds regulated firms to perform robust due diligence on 'Annex 1' firms—unregulated lenders, safe custody providers, money brokers, and financial leasing companies registered solely for AML purposes—due to their limited oversight and heightened financial crime risks. This matters because Annex 1 firms (approx. 1,200) are not subject to FCA's full rulebook, conduct rules, or protections like the Financial Ombudsman Service, exposing regulated firms to contagion risks if they fail to manage interactions properly. Non-compliance could lead to regulatory scrutiny, enforcement, or reputational damage amid FCA's ongoing AML focus.
What Changed
No new rules or legislative changes are introduced; this is a supervisory reminder reinforcing existing obligations under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017 (MLRs). It emphasizes enhanced due diligence on Annex 1 firms, referencing the 2025 National Risk Assessment (NRA) for risk management. The FCA highlights proactive engagement, including a 2024 letter to CEOs and follow-up with 300 firms in late 2025, signaling intensified supervision without altering the registration-only regime under the Financial Services and Markets Act.
What You Need To Do
- Verify Annex 1 registration status directly from the firm and via independent checks (e
- Understand the Annex 1 firm's business model, products, and risks, aligning with MLRs and 2025 NRA
- Manage identified risks, such as AML deficiencies or consumer encouragement into limited company structures for unregulated lending
- Document due diligence to demonstrate compliance, integrating into broader financial crime frameworks (e
Key Dates
2024 - FCA letter to CEOs of Annex 1 firms raising AML concerns. - **Late 2025 - FCA follow-up engagement with 300 Annex 1 firms.**
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This amplifies existing AML due diligence requirements amid FCA's 2025-30 financial crime strategy, with evidence of supervisory action (2024 letter, 2025 follow-ups). Failure risks enforcement, as Annex 1 interactions could facilitate financial crime or consumer harm without FOS protections; firms should audit exposures immediately to align with BWRA/CRA expectations and avoid findings like those in FCA's risk assessment review.
BankPayment ProviderAll Firms
No description available.
Bank
No description available.
The CFTC issued FAQs on March 20, 2026, providing clarification on how registered entities and market participants should handle crypto assets and blockchain technologies in their operations, building directly on the agency's tokenized collateral guidance and no-action relief issued in late 2025 and early 2026. This guidance is critical because it operationalizes the SEC-CFTC joint interpretation issued just three days earlier (March 17, 2026), which established a binding regulatory framework classifying 16 crypto assets as digital commodities and clarifying the treatment of non-security crypto assets under federal law.
What Changed
The CFTC FAQs address implementation questions arising from two prior staff positions:
Tokenized Collateral Guidance (CFTC Staff Letter 25-39): Established the framework allowing futures commission merchants (FCMs) and designated contract markets (DCMs) to accept digital assets as margin collateral.
No-Action Position (CFTC Staff Letter 26-05): Provided temporary relief permitting FCMs to accept payment stablecoins, Bitcoin, and Ether as customer margin collateral, subject to specific operational and notification requirements.
The FAQs clarify practical implementation questions that market...
What You Need To Do
- *Immediate (0–30 days)
- *Asset Classification Audit
- *Investment Contract Review
- *FAQ Implementation Review
- *Notification Protocol Establishment
Key Dates
March 20, 2026 - FAQs Published CFTC Market Participants Division and Division of Clearing and Risk issue clarifying FAQs effective immediately.
March 17, 2026 - SEC-CFTC Joint Interpretation Effective The foundational joint interpretation establishing crypto asset taxonomy and digital commodity classification became effective upon Federal Register publication.
Within 30–60 Days - Disclosure & Program Updates Firms must revise Form ADV, disclosure documents, offering materials, and custodial arrangements to reflect the new regulatory framework. DEADLINE
Immediate - Compliance Review Required Asset classification audits, staking arrangement reviews, and investment contract assessments must begin now; enforcement posture is live. DEADLINE
January 18, 2027 (Estimated) - GENIUS Act Stablecoin Exclusion Final implementing rules for payment stablecoins issued by permitted issuers; interim staff position applies now.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: CRITICAL
Crypto ExchangeBroker DealerFintech
We have opened an enforcement investigation into Market Financial Solutions Limited (MFS). MFS is an Annex 1 business, which is solely registered with and supervised by us for its compliance with the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017.Annex 1 registered firms are not authorised or subject to wider FCA regulation.MFS entered administration on 25 February 2026.
The FCA has opened an enforcement investigation into Market Financial Solutions Limited (MFS) following the firm's entry into administration on 25 February 2026, amid allegations of serious financial irregularities, fraud, and double-pledging of collateral. This investigation is significant because it represents regulatory scrutiny of an Annex 1 business—a firm with limited FCA oversight—whose collapse exposed structural weaknesses in private credit markets and raised questions about due diligence practices across the financial sector.
What Changed
The FCA's enforcement investigation does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather represents the regulator's response to alleged breaches of existing obligations. The key regulatory framework under which MFS is being investigated is:
Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017: MFS's primary regulatory obligation as an Annex 1 registered firm.
What You Need To Do
- *For MFS and its Administrators
- Cooperate fully with the FCA enforcement investigation
- Preserve all documentation related to AML/CTF compliance, customer due diligence, and transaction monitoring
- Provide access to bank accounts, transaction records, and compliance files to investigators
- Respond to FCA information requests within specified timeframes
Key Dates
25 February 2026 - MFS entered administration
20 March 2026 - FCA enforcement investigation opened (current date context)
No specific deadline provided for investigation completion or enforcement action
Compliance Impact
Urgency: CRITICAL
BankAll Firms
Showing 100 of 1199 updates. Browse by month to see more.