Live Updates

Circular IML 91/75 (as amended by Circulars CSSF 05/177, 18/697, 21/790, 22/811 and 25/901) (Updated)

AI Analysis

Executive Summary

Circular IML 91/75, as amended up to CSSF Circular 25/901, consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs, refining rules on diversification, borrowing, risk-spreading, and disclosures while tailoring requirements to investor profiles. It matters because it streamlines fragmented regulations, enhances fund competitiveness, and formalizes CSSF expectations without mandating immediate changes for pre-existing funds, reducing compliance burdens while promoting transparency and flexibility. This update aligns administrative practices with market realities, repealing outdated circulars to eliminate ambiguity. #

What Changed

- Consolidation and Repeals: Repeals CSSF Circulars 02/80, 07/309, 06/241, and Chapters G and I of IML 91/75; renders CSSF 08/356 and Chapter H of IML 91/75 inapplicable to Part II UCIs. - Flexible Diversification Rules: Introduces investor-category-based thresholds (e.g., stricter for retail, looser for sophisticated investors); allows CSSF derogations for SIFs/Part II UCIs with justification; applies look-through for intermediary vehicles; harmonizes ramp-up (up to 12 months for liquid strategies, 4 years for private equity) and wind-down periods. - Borrowing Limits: New limits for SIFs/Part II UCIs (e.g., 70% of net assets, excluding temporary borrowings tied to commitments); tailored by investor type. - Enhanced Disclosures: Offering documents must detail investment policies, risks (es

What You Need To Do

  • Review and update offering documents/prospectuses for enhanced transparency on risks, limits, borrowing, liquidity tools (e
  • Align fund documentation/terminology with CSSF Compilation of key concepts for consistency in filings and communications
  • Disclose ramp-up/wind-down periods, potential derogations, and life extensions clearly; seek CSSF approval for exemptions where justified
  • Assess portfolio compliance for new funds/compartments; leverage flexibility for sophisticated investors but maintain robust governance
  • No immediate changes required for pre-19 Dec 2025 funds, but proactive alignment recommended to avoid future issues

Compliance Impact

Urgency: Medium – Not critical as existing funds are grandfathered with no retroactive changes required, but high relevance for new launches or material updates post-19 Dec 2025. It matters for operational efficiency (streamlined rules reduce fragmentation) and investor protection (tailored risks/disclosures), potentially lowering long-term costs while mitigating supervisory scrutiny; failure to u

Who is Affected

Primary: Managers and operators of Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs (including compartments) authorized post-19 December 2025.Secondary: Existing funds (grandfathered but should update docs); service providers handling disclosures, portfolio management, or reporting.Exclusions: UCITS, MMFs, ELTIFs, EuVECA/EuSEF, pre-existing closed-ended funds.Broader: Luxembourg fund industry stakeholders, investors (especially retail in private equity strategies), and CSSF-supervised entities under 1988 UCI Law.

Summary

Revision and remodelling of the rules to which Luxembourg undertakings governed by the Law of 30 March 1988 on undertakings for collective investment (“UCI”) are subject

Relevant Firm Types

Asset ManagerHedge FundAll Firms
View Original on CSSF Back to Feed