Capital Markets & Trading regulatory updates from Australia.
We track 67 Capital Markets & Trading updates from Australia regulators, published by ASIC. The archive covers 67 news items. Most recent update: September 2026.
ASIC observes improved sustainability reporting and notes areas for further development
Why this matters
This is a regulatory guidance update based on ASIC's review of 312 sustainability reports from the first cohort of mandatory reporters. It provides actionable feedback on compliance quality, identifies gaps (forward-looking disclosures, assumptions/judgements), and signals ASIC's ongoing monitoring and engagement with...
ASIC sues former Super Retail Group CEO Anthony Heraghty alleging directors’ duties breaches and misleading statements
Why this matters
This is a civil penalty enforcement action by ASIC against a senior executive of a major ASX-listed retailer (Super Retail Group) alleging breaches of sections 180 and 1309(2) of the Corporations Act.
Scams and governance failures dominate misconduct report
Why this matters
This is an informational news release reporting ASIC's H1 2026 misconduct data. It highlights enforcement priorities (pump-and-dump scams, governance failures, unlicensed financial services) and encourages public reporting.
Former Beacon Minerals project manager Alexander McCulloch sentenced for insider trading
Why this matters
This is a concluded enforcement case by ASIC resulting in conviction and sentencing for insider trading under s1043A of the Corporations Act. The case demonstrates regulatory action against a senior insider who procured associates to trade on material non-public information.
ASIC and APRA warn frontier AI awareness must turn to action
AI Analysis
ASIC and APRA have published outcomes from nine June–July 2026 roundtables involving more than 600 financial-sector participants, warning that awareness of frontier-AI risks must now translate into tested cyber, operational-resilience and governance measures. The publication does not create a new binding rule or compliance deadline, but it materially raises supervisory expectations for boards, executives and regulated entities, particularly because frontier AI is compressing attack and incident-response timeframes and amplifying third-party concentration risk.
Key dates
2026-04-30
APRA issued its letter to banks, insurers and superannuation trustees calling for a step-change in governance, risk management, assurance and operational resilience for AI-related risks.
2026-05-08
ASIC issued its open letter to all licensees and market participants urging urgent strengthening of cyber resilience as frontier AI intensifies the global cyber-risk environment.
2026-06-01
ASIC and APRA began the June–July 2026 series of nine industry roundtables on frontier-AI preparedness and resilience; the source identifies June as the starting month but does not provide an exact day.
2026-07-31
ASIC and APRA completed the June–July 2026 roundtable period; the source does not provide an exact closing day.
2026-08-27
ASIC published the joint warning and related information paper and preparedness checklist, urging entities to move from awareness to action.
Suggested considerations
Firms should consider presenting the ASIC and APRA roundtable themes, together with the available board and executive preparedness checklist, to the board and relevant risk or technology committees.
Compliance teams may wish to map frontier-AI cyber and operational risks to existing obligations and controls under APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management, APRA CPS 234 Information Security, APRA CPS 220 Risk Management where applicable, and the entity's ASIC licence, governance and cyber-resilience arrangements.
Firms should consider identifying critical assets, systems, data flows and material third-party dependencies, including common providers and concentration points that could create sector-wide disruption.
Technology and security teams may wish to test patching, identity and privileged-access controls, attack-surface reduction, backup integrity, recovery-time priorities and incident-response playbooks against AI-accelerated attack scenarios.
Boards and executives should consider documenting risk appetite, incident escalation authority, recovery priorities, internal and external communication strategies and decision rights before a frontier-AI-related crisis occurs.
Firms should consider testing response and recovery arrangements under compressed timeframes and retaining evidence of exercise results, lessons learned, remediation owners and completion status.
Entities using or procuring AI should consider applying existing model, data, supplier, change-management and assurance controls to internally developed models, vendor tools and embedded AI functionality, including defensive-AI tools used for threat intelligence, vulnerability detection, code review or incident response.
Procurement and outsourcing functions may wish to strengthen supplier assurance, obtain relevant information on providers' AI and cyber controls, map material dependencies and assess substitutability and exit arrangements.
What changed
The regulators have consolidated a cross-sector expectation that entities address frontier-AI risk through cyber fundamentals, critical-asset identification, timely patching, strong identity and access controls, attack-surface reduction, reliable backups, tested response and recovery arrangements, and third-party risk management.
Compliance impact
The immediate impact is supervisory and governance-related rather than a new directly enforceable requirement: entities may face heightened scrutiny of whether their existing operational-risk, information-security, outsourcing and incident-management controls are effective against AI-accelerated threats. The regulators' emphasis on tested arrangements, board decisions and critical dependencies increases the risk that inadequate preparation could be treated as evidence of deficient governance, cyber resilience or operational-risk management if an incident occurs.
ASIC warns scammers are using AI to spin vast webs of deception
AI Analysis
ASIC has warned that generative AI is enabling coordinated investment-scam networks involving deepfake celebrity and politician endorsements, fabricated news, fake reviews, spoof websites and counterfeit investment platforms. The release does not create new binding obligations, but the scale of ASIC’s FY26 takedown activity—more than 19,400 scams, including 7,051 fake investment platforms—signals heightened regulatory scrutiny of impersonation, digital advertising, licence misrepresentation and consumer-protection controls.
Suggested considerations
Firms should consider reviewing digital advertising, affiliate, referral and social-media monitoring for deepfake endorsements, unauthorised use of executive or brand identities, fake licence claims and links to cloned investment platforms.
Compliance teams may wish to test whether the firm’s website address, legal entity name, AFSL number and contact details are consistently displayed and match ASIC’s Professional Registers Search, including any authorised representative relationships.
Firms should consider implementing or refreshing rapid escalation and takedown processes for impersonation, cloned websites, fraudulent advertisements and misleading investment promotions, with documented evidence of referrals to platforms, banks, ASIC, cyber.gov.au and Scamwatch where appropriate.
Marketing and distribution controls may wish to require provenance and approval checks for celebrity, influencer, public-figure and AI-generated content, together with surveillance for fabricated reviews, news articles and testimonials.
Risk and governance functions should consider assessing AI-enabled scam and impersonation scenarios within financial-crime, cyber-risk, operational-resilience and consumer-harm frameworks, including scripted follow-up calls, fake trading dashboards and small initial profit payments used to build trust.
Firms should consider reviewing customer and counterparty onboarding controls for entities claiming to hold an AFSL, and escalation procedures where an opportunity encourages consumers to bypass licensed professionals or cannot be independently verified.
Boards or risk committees may wish to receive trend reporting on impersonation incidents, customer complaints, fraudulent domains, takedown requests, losses and control remediation, notwithstanding that this media release itself imposes no new reporting requirement.
What changed
No new rule, mandatory control, reporting obligation or compliance deadline was introduced. ASIC has reinforced its expectation that consumers independently verify Australian Financial Services Licence details against the professional registers, including matching the licence holder’s name and number to the business or opportunity being promoted. The warning also indicates that reliance on search-engine results, polished websites, branding, testimonials, celebrity endorsements or claims of ASIC licensing is insufficient where firms or consumers assess legitimacy.
Compliance impact
The immediate legal impact is limited because this is a warning rather than a legislative instrument, regulatory guide, licence condition or enforcement action. The supervisory and conduct risk is nevertheless significant: ASIC’s data shows rapidly increasing fake-platform, phishing and cryptocurrency-scam activity, while firms whose brands or licence details are misused may face consumer harm, reputational damage and scrutiny under existing obligations concerning misleading conduct, financial services licensing, adequate risk management and cyber resilience.
ASIC warns retail investors about risky products offered by online brokers
AI Analysis
ASIC has published a warning after a targeted surveillance of nine online brokers, finding shortcomings in target market determinations, onboarding, and disclosure for short-dated ETOs, futures, and fractional shares offered to retail investors. The publication matters because ASIC says these products can produce rapid, magnified losses and may be unsuitable for many retail clients.
Key dates
2026-03-01
ASIC surveillance period began
2026-06-30
ASIC surveillance period ended
Suggested considerations
Compliance teams may wish to review whether target market determinations are narrowly drafted and contain specific reasoning on how the product fits likely objectives, financial situations, and needs.
Firms may wish to test whether onboarding questionnaires are genuinely tailored to client circumstances and whether repeated or unlimited retakes create a weak suitability gate.
Firms may wish to assess whether disclosures clearly explain leverage, time decay, settlement, ownership rights, custody arrangements, transferability, and all material fees or costs.
Compliance teams may wish to review sign-up incentives, fee-free trading claims, and reward promotions to confirm they do not obscure product risk or encourage impulsive trading.
Firms may wish to verify that product governance and distribution controls continue after onboarding through monitoring, escalation, and remediation processes.
Compliance teams may wish to consider whether retail distribution of short-dated ETOs and futures should be restricted or more tightly segmented given ASIC’s statement that these products are unlikely to suit many retail investors.
What changed
This is not a new binding rule; it is a supervisory publication that signals ASIC’s expectations for firms offering complex or high-risk products to retail investors. ASIC says entities should ensure target market determinations are sufficiently specific, onboarding questions are tailored to client circumstances, and disclosures clearly explain the risks, costs, ownership structures, and transfer implications associated with products such as fractional shares, ETOs, and futures.
Compliance impact
ASIC is signaling a meaningful conduct and product-governance risk for brokers distributing complex products to retail clients, with deficiencies already prompting remediation and market exit by some firms. The regulator says it is continuing to address concerns and is considering further regulatory or enforcement action, which raises the prospect of supervisory follow-up or formal enforcement if weaknesses persist.
McPherson’s liable for continuous disclosure failure and misleading investors, former CEO breached directors’ duties
AI Analysis
ASIC’s publication reports that the Federal Court found McPherson’s Limited breached continuous disclosure laws and engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct in relation to its October 2020 earnings guidance, and that former CEO Laurence McAllister breached his duty of care and diligence as a director. The decision matters because it reinforces that listed entities must promptly correct market guidance when later information shows the original forecast no longer has a reasonable basis.
Key dates
2020-10-20
McPherson’s issued earnings guidance to the market forecasting profit growth, supported by Dr LeWinn purchasing forecasts.
2020-11-12
Court found McPherson’s had sufficient information that sales and purchasing forecasts were materially below expectations and corrective disclosure was required.
2020-11-30
End of the period in which McPherson’s failed to correct the market.
2020-12-01
McPherson’s downgraded and withdrew its earnings guidance; the share price fell 34.5%.
2022-12-09
ASIC commenced civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against McPherson’s and Mr McAllister.
Suggested considerations
Compliance teams may wish to review escalation processes for sales data, forecast changes, and other information that could undermine published earnings guidance.
Firms may wish to test whether internal triggers require reassessment of market disclosures when trading updates, channel data, or event results materially diverge from prior assumptions.
Directors and officers may wish to confirm who is responsible for approving market announcements and whether they have sufficient visibility over information that could make prior statements misleading.
Listed entities may wish to reassess procedures for correcting or withdrawing guidance promptly after new information emerges, especially where prior statements were repeated in cleansing notices or AGM materials.
What changed
This is an enforcement outcome, not a new rule: the Court held that McPherson’s had a duty to correct the market once it learned, by 2020-11-12, that Dr LeWinn purchasing forecasts and sales results were significantly below expectations and that the October 2020 profit forecast no longer had a reasonable basis. The Court found the company breached continuous disclosure obligations and misled investors by failing to disclose the revised forecasts and by not withdrawing the October 2020 profit forecast between 2020-11-12 and 2020-11-30.
Compliance impact
The Court treated the delay as serious because it allegedly left the market with a misleading profit outlook for nearly three weeks and exposed both the company and its former CEO to civil penalty consequences. ASIC highlighted that delays in correcting materially changed earnings guidance can undermine market integrity and investor confidence.
Stavro D’Amore jailed for misusing nearly $700,000 in Berndale funds
Why this matters
This is a news report of a criminal sentencing involving a former director of an OTC derivatives provider (Berndale Capital Securities). The case involves dishonest misuse of client funds ($681k), false statements to ASIC, and breach of AFS licensing requirements.
ASIC suspends AFS licence of CFD issuer GFA Capital Markets
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action suspending AFS licence of CFD issuer for client money mishandling, reporting breaches, and compliance failures. Informational regulatory announcement of completed enforcement decision with no immediate action required by other firms.
ASIC proposes improved pre-IPO advertising flexibility and global alignment
Why this matters
ASIC proposes relaxing pre-IPO advertising restrictions to align with international standards and modernize capital markets rules. This is informational regulatory guidance affecting IPO disclosure practices and prospectus requirements, primarily impacting broker-dealers and asset managers involved in capital raising.
ASIC sues Auditeo and auditors over alleged First Guardian audit failures
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against audit firm Auditeo and auditors regarding First Guardian Master Fund collapse. Addresses audit failures in managed fund oversight, investor protection failures, and auditor misconduct.
Court winds up Capital Guard and appoints liquidators following successful ASIC application
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against Capital Guard for misconduct including fake bond promotion, mishandling of investor funds, and licence cancellation. This is informational regulatory news documenting court-ordered liquidation and asset recovery proceedings.
ASIC cancels the registered agent status of Registry Australia Pty Ltd
Why this matters
ASIC regulatory action cancelling registered agent status for compliance breaches. This is informational news about enforcement action against a service provider. Relevant to firms using registered agents for company administration services. No immediate urgency as this is a completed enforcement action being reported.
ASIC reminds Registered Company Auditors of their obligations and outlines stronger oversight
Why this matters
ASIC regulatory reminder to registered company auditors regarding their legal and professional obligations. This is informational guidance on audit compliance, independence requirements, and oversight activities.
Federal Court finds former Noumi CEO breached directors’ duties and financial reporting obligations
Why this matters
Federal Court judgment against former CEO for breaching directors' duties and financial reporting obligations. This is an enforcement outcome establishing precedent for director accountability in financial reporting accuracy.
ASIC warning: Pump and dump scammers intensify use of fake celebrity endorsements
Why this matters
ASIC warning about pump and dump scams using fake celebrity endorsements and market manipulation. Primary focus on market abuse/manipulation schemes, consumer protection against investment fraud, and financial crime.
ASIC's Statement of Intent is a high-level strategic document outlining regulatory approach and organizational objectives across all regulated sectors. It addresses governance, regulatory framework, and stakeholder relationships rather than specific compliance requirements.
NAB’s WealthHub fined over $1 million for reporting failures
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against WealthHub for systematic regulatory reporting failures over 10 years, specifically regarding Intermediary ID data in trade reports. This is informational news content documenting a completed enforcement outcome rather than an emerging regulatory requirement.
Deutsche Bank pays $2 million penalty for systemic trade reporting failures
Why this matters
Deutsche Bank enforcement action for systemic failures in OTC derivative transaction reporting to ASIC. This is regulatory news documenting a completed enforcement matter with penalty paid. The violation involved misreporting direction fields across 260,000+ transactions, affecting market monitoring capabilities.
ASIC announcement of AFS licence cancellation for CFD issuer Trive Financial Services Australia. Primary focus on licensing action and consumer protection in high-risk CFD sector. Informational news release regarding regulatory enforcement and industry supervision.
ASX ordered to pay $20.5 million penalty for misleading conduct relating to CHESS replacement project
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against ASX for misleading market announcements regarding CHESS replacement project. Informational news item documenting Federal Court penalty decision. Relevant to capital markets operators and their disclosure obligations regarding material project updates.
ASIC cancels AFS licence of Capital Guard for fake bond sale and other dishonest conduct
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action cancelling AFS licence of Capital Guard for fraudulent bond sales, fake prospectus, investor deception, and operational failures. Informational regulatory enforcement news with implications for investment services compliance and consumer protection standards.
ASIC pushes for coordinated action to strengthen competitiveness of Australian markets
Why this matters
ASIC media release announcing coordinated roundtable to strengthen Australian capital markets competitiveness through financial innovation. Key focus areas include DLT, tokenised assets, AI-driven trading, automated surveillance, and market infrastructure modernisation.
Rex held accountable for continuous disclosure failure, three non-executive directors did not breach duties
Why this matters
This is an ASIC enforcement decision regarding continuous disclosure obligations breached by a listed airline company. The case establishes precedent on disclosure timing and director accountability.
WA director Trent Bowden pleads guilty to over $1.5 million investor deception
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against director for fraudulent misappropriation of investor funds ($1.5M+) through false representations about forex trading. Classified as informational news/enforcement update rather than urgent regulatory change.
Property developer David McWilliams charged over $10 million fraud scheme
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against property developer for $10.1M fraud involving misuse of investor funds raised for disability housing projects. Charges include dishonest use of funds, false statements to investors, and conversion to personal use (luxury assets, cryptocurrency, gambling).
Former Metigy CEO David Fairfull sentenced to nine years’ imprisonment
Why this matters
ASIC enforcement action against former CEO for misleading investors and misusing director position. Involves false statements about financial performance in capital raising activities and dishonest use of company funds.
High Court ruling clarifies that fixed-yield digital asset products constitute financial products requiring ASIC licensing. Establishes precedent that digital asset offerings fall under existing regulatory framework regardless of labeling.
ASX admits misleading conduct relating to CHESS replacement project
Why this matters
ASX admitted to misleading market disclosures about critical infrastructure project status, resulting in Federal Court proceedings with $20.5M penalty. This is informational news regarding market conduct violations and disclosure failures by a major exchange operator.
Federal Court orders record $300 million penalties in ASIC’s case over ‘egregious’ Union Standard and CFD operator misconduct
Why this matters
Record $300.2M penalties against CFD issuer Union Standard and authorized representatives for systemic unconscionable conduct, misleading representations, and targeting vulnerable investors. Enforcement action demonstrates regulatory accountability for AFS licensees and their representatives.
Palmer Leisure Coolum Pty Ltd pleads guilty to takeover law breaches
Why this matters
This is an ASIC enforcement action regarding takeover law breaches under the Corporations Act. The case involves failure to comply with mandatory offer requirements within the prescribed two-month period, which falls under market abuse and disclosure obligations.
Fashion and beauty retailers trading under the Zara, H&M and Sephora brands pay $596,000 in infringement notices for failing to lodge financial reports on time
Why this matters
This is an ASIC enforcement news release regarding late financial report lodgement by large proprietary companies in retail sectors. While the companies operate in fashion and beauty retail (non-financial), the regulatory focus is on financial reporting compliance obligations that apply broadly to large proprietary...
CDPP discontinues insider trading charges against Big Un former CFO Andrew Corner following hung jury
Why this matters
This is an informational news release from ASIC regarding the discontinuation of insider trading charges against a former CFO. It relates to market abuse enforcement and capital markets conduct.
Fund manager Rodney Forrest re-sentenced to five years and three months’ jail following insider trading appeal
Why this matters
This is an informational news release about a completed criminal prosecution for insider trading involving a fund manager. It documents a court re-sentencing decision and ASIC's enforcement actions.
ASIC appeals Federal Court decision dismissing case against Nuix
Why this matters
ASIC appeal concerning continuous disclosure obligations and misleading statements about financial performance (ACV metrics) by software provider Nuix. Informational news update on regulatory enforcement action; classified as null urgency as this is a news announcement rather than a directive requiring immediate...
ASIC sets financial reporting, audit and sustainability focus areas for FY 2026–27
Why this matters
ASIC's announcement of FY 2026-27 focus areas for financial reporting, audit and sustainability surveillance. Informational guidance affecting listed/unlisted companies, RSEs, MISs and audit firms.
Former Big Un CEO pleads guilty in insider trading case
Why this matters
This regulatory update is about a former CEO pleading guilty to insider trading, which is a serious market abuse offense. It involves reporting and disclosure failures, as well as potential licensing and authorization issues for the firm and individuals involved.
Electro Optic Systems Holdings ordered to pay $4 million penalty for continuous disclosure breaches
Why this matters
This regulatory update is relevant to all firms as it involves a public company's failure to disclose material information in a timely manner, which is a key requirement for maintaining market integrity and investor confidence.
ASIC publishes ASX Inquiry Panel Final Report and acknowledges observations
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC focuses on issues with the governance, capability, and risk management of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX), which operates critical market infrastructure.
Supreme Court orders Macquarie Securities to pay $35 million penalty in short sale misreporting case
Why this matters
This regulatory update is classified as high urgency as it involves a significant penalty imposed on a major financial institution, Macquarie Securities, for failures in accurately reporting short sale data.
ASIC cancels AFS licence of Pulse Markets for serious and sustained breaches of duties
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC involves the cancellation of an Australian financial services (AFS) license for a securities dealer, Pulse Markets, due to serious and sustained breaches of its duties.
SEC Chair and Nobel prize-winning economist to headline ASIC innovation symposium
Why this matters
This regulatory update announces an upcoming ASIC symposium focused on innovation and technology in the financial services industry, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region.
Petra Capital fined for regulatory data reporting failures
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC focuses on a broker-dealer firm, Petra Capital, being fined for failures in accurately reporting regulatory data. This impacts the capital markets and trading sector, and relates to reporting and disclosure obligations as well as market abuse surveillance.
Director of Warwick Gold and Impact Gold disqualified from managing corporations for four years
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC involves the disqualification of a director from managing corporations, which has implications for investment management firms, wealth managers, and banks in terms of governance, conduct, and prudential requirements.
ASIC approves Cboe’s listing application to bolster competition in public markets
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC approves Cboe's application to operate a listing market in Australia, which will increase competition in the public markets. This is relevant for capital markets firms and will impact market dynamics and oversight.
Victorian man sentenced in Cann Group insider trading case
Why this matters
This regulatory update covers an insider trading case involving a medical cannabis company, which is relevant to firms in the banking, investment management, and capital markets sectors.
ASIC Annual Forum to focus on the challenges of a rapidly evolving economy as it returns to Melbourne in November
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC covers a range of topics relevant to financial firms, including the state of the economy, consumer trust, capital markets, digital transformation, and enforcement priorities.
ASIC’s annual report reveals strong growth in enforcement action and investigations and keen focus on strengthening markets
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC covers a range of enforcement actions, investigations, and regulatory initiatives across the financial services sector. It indicates a strong focus on consumer protection, market integrity, and transparency, which are of high importance for firms operating in banking, capital markets,...
This regulatory update from ASIC discusses Cboe Global Markets' decision to sell its Australian and Canadian market businesses. It is relevant to capital markets participants, particularly broker-dealers, as it involves changes to market structure and competition.
Former CEO of AI marketing company Metigy pleads guilty to misleading investors and dishonestly using his position
Why this matters
This regulatory update is relevant for investment management firms, wealth managers, and broker-dealers as it involves a former CEO pleading guilty to misleading investors and misusing his position. The topics of consumer protection, reporting/disclosure, and authorization/licensing are key areas of concern.
This regulatory update from ASIC outlines a roadmap to promote strong, efficient, and globally competitive capital markets in Australia. It covers key topics such as modernizing public markets, enhancing supervision of private markets and private credit, and the role of superannuation funds.
ASIC sues suspended WA mineral exploration company AVZ Minerals and directors for disclosure failures
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC involves allegations of disclosure failures and misleading conduct by a mineral exploration company, AVZ Minerals, and its directors. This impacts capital markets and the crypto/digital assets sector, as the company's operations involve a lithium project in the DRC.
ASIC imposes additional conditions on Learn To Trade to address compliance failures
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC imposes additional conditions on the AFS license of Learn To Trade Pty Ltd, a provider of coaching and training services related to trading on margin foreign exchange contracts or contracts for difference.
ASIC sues former Electro Optic Systems Holdings director and CEO Ben Greene for breach of director’s duties
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC involves allegations of a former director and CEO of a publicly listed company breaching their duties by failing to disclose material changes to the company's financial guidance.
Defence systems manufacturer Electro Optic Systems Holdings admits to breaching continuous disclosure requirements
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC relates to a public company's failure to disclose material changes to its financial forecasts, which is a key reporting and disclosure requirement for listed firms. It also involves potential market abuse issues around the timing of the disclosure.
ASIC issues DDO stop order against FXCM for TMD deficiencies
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC is focused on issues with the target market determination (TMD) for CFDs offered by FXCM, a broker dealer. ASIC has issued a stop order preventing FXCM from issuing CFDs to retail clients due to deficiencies in the TMD.
Victorian man sentenced in market manipulation case
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC focuses on a case of market manipulation involving wash trading in ASX-listed securities. It is relevant for capital markets firms and more broadly for all firms that need to be aware of and prevent market abuse practices.
ASIC announces transformational package to safeguard Australia’s financial markets in response to ASX Inquiry interim report
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC announces a transformational package of reforms to address shortcomings in the governance, capability, risk management and culture of the ASX Group, which operates critical national market infrastructure.
CADB cancels registration of Sydney auditor for breaching duties across 10 ASX-listed audits
Why this matters
This regulatory update is relevant to banking and capital markets firms, as it involves the cancellation of an auditor's registration due to breaches of auditing standards. The update covers topics related to authorization, reporting, and governance, which are critical for regulated financial firms.
Macquarie Securities admits to misleading conduct and agrees to pay $35 million for systemic failures
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC involves a broker-dealer, Macquarie Securities, admitting to misleading conduct and systemic failures in accurately reporting short sales and regulatory data. This is a serious issue impacting market transparency and integrity, warranting a high urgency classification.
Market riggers sentenced in ASX ‘pump and dump’ case
Why this matters
This regulatory update covers a case of market manipulation and 'pump and dump' schemes involving cryptocurrency and stock trading. It is relevant for broker-dealers, crypto exchanges, and other firms involved in capital markets and trading activities.
Pump and dump scammers put regulators on high alert
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC warns about 'pump and dump' scams targeting Australian investors, particularly in small-cap stocks and overseas markets. It highlights the growing sophistication of these schemes and the need for increased vigilance and coordination among regulators globally.
ASIC secures nearly $40 million in refunds to investors and drives change after CFD sector falls short
Why this matters
This regulatory update from ASIC focuses on the contracts for difference (CFD) sector, which involves high-risk leveraged trading products. ASIC has taken enforcement action, secured refunds for investors, and driven compliance improvements across the industry.
Fund manager sentenced to 6 years’ jail in $3 million Platinum Asset Management insider trading case
Why this matters
This regulatory update covers a high-profile insider trading case involving a fund manager at Platinum Asset Management. It is relevant for investment managers and broker-dealers due to the market abuse and disclosure issues involved.