ESMA signs Memorandum of Understanding with the Reserve Bank of India 27 January 2026 CCP International cooperation The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to facilitate cooperation and exchange of information for the recognition of central counterparties (CCPs) established in India and supervised by RBI. This agreement marks a significant step...
In his latest blog, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf argues that economists must adapt their analytical frameworks and expand their focus beyond traditional topics to address emerging challengesโsuch as geopolitical upheaval and defence spendingโin order to provide robust evidence-based policy advice that serves the public interest.
Central Bank of Ireland has successfully completed the sale of its Spencer Dock (East Wing) building to the Office of Public Works for โฌ23.7m. The sale of Spencer Dock was a key element of the Central Bankโs longer term property strategy aligned to our decision to develop a single Dockland Campus through the purchase of our North Wall Quay building and subsequent purchase of our Mayor Street building. This sale of the East Wing, to Office of Public Works on 22 January 2026, follows the earlie...
On 21 January 2026, Guavapay Limited entered compulsory liquidation. The Official Receiver, an officer of the Insolvency Service, is its liquidator. Guavapay is authorised by the FCA to issue E-money and provide payment services to its customers.On 17 September 2025, Guavapay agreed to a voluntary requirement with the FCA, restricting the activities it can undertake. See details on the Financial Services Register.As liquidator, The Official Receiver is responsible for:Managing customer claims...
FINRA's Information Notice 11/7/25 publishes a **2026 Filing Schedule** on its website to guide clearing firms on accurate submission dates for extensions of time under Federal Reserve Regulation T, SEA Rule 15c3-3, and FINRA Rule 4210, accounting for holidays and business days. This matters because the automated REX system rejects incorrect dates, forcing resubmissions that delay compliance and risk regulatory violations amid shortened settlement cycles.
#
What Changed
No new regulatory requirements or rule amendments; this is guidance providing a pre-calculated Filing Schedule for 2026 to prevent errors in the REX system. It emphasizes using schedule dates around holidays when exchanges or banks close, and confirms fixed SEA Rule 15c3-3 deadlines (e.g., 30th/45th calendar days post-settlement, 10th business day for (m) possession/control, regardless of foreign settlement cycles).
#
What You Need To Do
Access and reference the 2026 Filing Schedule on FINRA's website (via https://www
Input schedule-specific dates for extensions, particularly around 2026 holidays when exchanges/banks close, to avoid automatic denials
File SEA Rule 15c3-3 extensions on exact due dates listed above, even for foreign-traded securities
Contact Theresa Reynolds (646-315-8567 or email) for questions
Update internal compliance calendars, training, and systems to integrate the schedule
Key Dates
November 7, 2025- Notice published; 2026 Filing Schedule made available on FINRA website.
Throughout 2026- Use Filing Schedule for all extension requests, especially pre/post-holidays (e.g., Veterans Day 11/11/2026 bank holiday, Thanksgiving 11/26/2026, Christmas 12/25/2026).
30th calendar day after settlement- (d)(2).
45th calendar day after settlement- (d)(3), (h).
2nd business day after 30th calendar day from segregation deficit- (d)(4).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Proactive guidance prevents operational disruptions from REX rejections, but no immediate deadlines or penalties for non-use; however, inaccurate filings risk delayed margin compliance, customer liquidations under Regulation T, or possession/control failures under SEA Rule 15c3-3,
CP25/15 proposes prudential rules and guidance for UK firms issuing **qualifying stablecoins** and safeguarding **qualifying cryptoassets**, aiming to foster a safe, competitive crypto sector while prioritizing consumer protection and market integrity. This matters for compliance professionals as it introduces tailored prudential sourcebooks (COREPRU and CRYPTOPRU) to mitigate firm failure risks, aligning with the FCA's crypto roadmap and Treasury's statutory plans.
#
What Changed
Prudential Sourcebooks: Introduces COREPRU (core requirements across sectors) and CRYPTOPRU (crypto-specific calibrations) for "CRYPTOPRU firms" handling regulated crypto activities, covering own funds adequacy, capital resources, and stress-adjusted internal capital assessments.
Own Funds and Capital Rules: Firms must hold financial resources adequate in amount and quality, including adjustments for valuation uncertainty, stress realizable values, and interim profits in CET1 capital; supplement
What You Need To Do
Respond to Consultation
Assess Applicability
Prepare Prudential Frameworks
Engage on Related CPs
Data and Reporting Readiness
Key Dates
28/05/2025- Consultation opens and CP first published.
31/07/2025- Consultation closes; submit feedback via online form, email ([emailย protected]), or post.
Post-31/07/2025- FCA considers feedback and publishes final rules (no specific date given).
Q3 2025- Upcoming Conduct and Firm Standards CP affecting all cryptoasset firms, including QS issuers and custodians.
Future (CP2 per Roadmap)- Consultation on remaining prudential sourcebook requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ As of January 2026, the consultation closed over five months ago, signaling imminent final rules that could reshape prudential requirements for crypto firms; non-compliance risks authorization barriers, enforcement, or market exclusion in a regime prioritizing stability amid global c
The FCA and PRA are consulting on setting the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) at ยฃ113 million for 2026/27, comprising a ยฃ108 million management expenses budget (up ยฃ4.4 million from 2025/26, broadly in line with inflation) and a ยฃ5 million unlevied reserve. This matters because it caps the operating costs (e.g., IT, staff, legal, claims handling) that FCA- and PRA-authorised firms must fund via levies, excluding separate compensation payments, ensuring FSCS efficiency while controlling firm burdens.
#
What Changed
Proposed MELL of ยฃ113 million for 2026/27: ยฃ108 million budget + ยฃ5 million unlevied reserve.
Budget increase of ยฃ4.4 million (4%) from 2025/26, aligned with inflation; excluding new revolving credit facility (RCF) enhancement costs, it reflects a ยฃ6.6 million nominal and ยฃ11 million real-terms reduction on a like-for-like basis.
Budget allocated across PRA and FCA fee blocks based on firms' regulated business volume, with smaller firms contributing less.
No changes to compensation levies, which
What You Need To Do
Review CP26/2 (FCA) and CP1/26 (PRA) alongside FSCS January 2026 Budget Update for allocation details
Submit feedback on proposed MELL by 10 February 2026 to PRA (email or 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA)
Budget for potential levy payments starting 1 April 2026, based on firm's share of PRA/FCA classes (see Appendix 4 in CP)
Monitor post-consultation Policy Statement/Handbook Notice for final MELL confirmation
Key Dates
13 January 2026- Consultation opens (CP26/2 FCA; CP1/26 PRA).
10 February 2026- Consultation closes; submit comments via email or post to PRA (accepted on behalf of both regulators, shared anonymously with FSCS).
1 April 2026- Final rules effective (start of FSCS financial year); PRA Policy Statement and FCA Handbook Notice expected post-consultation.
31 March 2027- MELL period ends.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Firms face predictable levy increases aligned with inflation, with levies allocated by business volume (minimal for small firms), but must act on consultation feedback by 10 February 2026 (today is 25 January 2026, leaving ~2 weeks). Matters for financial planning and budgeting, as
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Rostock24 Limited and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website rostock24(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation. Rostock24 Limited, which purportedly has its head office in Nuremberg, claims to be registered with the British Companies House. This is not the case.
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2025 accounts: the AMF flags up points for vigilance and issues recommendations
Application of the Guidelines of the European Banking Authority on the management of environmental, social and governance (ESG) risks (EBA/GL/2025/01)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/905 mandates the application of EBA Guidelines (EBA/GL/2025/01) on managing **ESG risks** for Luxembourg-supervised institutions, requiring integration of environmental, social, and governance risk identification, measurement, management, and monitoring into internal processes. This aligns with CRD amendments (Articles 74, 76, 87a) and emphasizes proportionality to institutions' business models, with plans including timelines, targets, and milestones toward EU climate goals like net-zero by 2050. It matters for compliance as it embeds ESG into prudential supervision, potentially impacting capital, risk frameworks, and supervisory reviews.
#
What Changed
Institutions must establish proportionate strategies, policies, processes, and systems for ESG risk management, covering short-, medium-, and long-term horizons, including transition and physical environmental risks.
Develop plans per Article 76(2) CRD with specific timelines, intermediate quantifiable targets, and milestones to address ESG financial risks, consistent with EU objectives (e.g., 55% GHG reduction by 2030, climate neutrality by 2050).
Incorporate ESG into internal governance, risk
What You Need To Do
Map and integrate ESG risks into governance, risk management frameworks, and business strategies, proportionate to scale/risk exposure
Develop and document ESG risk management plans with quantifiable targets, milestones, timelines, and scenario analyses (broad requirements now; detailed later)
Conduct assessments of ESG risks in portfolios, including sustainability products, transition finance, and loan origination policies, for SREP submission
Embed in internal processes per Articles 74, 76, 87a CRD: identify/measure ESG risks (minimum standards), monitor over time horizons, and report to CSSF
Review and update existing policies/systems for compliance by applicable dates; prepare for CSSF supervisory evaluation of plan robustness
Key Dates
20 January 2026- Circular published by CSSF.
1 April 2026- Application date for Less Significant Institutions (other than SNCIs).
11 January 2027- Application date for SNCIs (dependent on CRD transposition).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - With application starting 1 April 2026 (just over 2 months from publication), firms face immediate pressure to gap-analyze current ESG frameworks against EBA standards, especially for SREP integration and long-term risk planning. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny, capital add
Supervision Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the role and involvement of the compliance function at investment services providers
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusi
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by mid-2026)
*Conduct impact assessment
*Review IRB permissions
*Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
*Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026โ PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027โ Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027โ Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028โ FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadlineโ Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessmentDEADLINE
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027Basel 3.1 rules take effectDEADLINE
1 Jan 2028Internal model approach for market risk takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
The PRA's PS2/26 finalizes the retirement of the "refined methodology" in Pillar 2A capital requirements, effective 1 January 2027, aligning with Basel 3.1 implementation to simplify the framework by eliminating an operationally burdensome adjustment originally designed to address conservatism in the standardized approach (SA) to credit risk. This matters for compliance professionals as it reduces complexity in ICAAP and SREP processes, with expected neutral aggregate capital impact, though firm-specific effects may vary and require supervisory engagement.
#
What Changed
Retirement of refined methodology: The refined methodology, introduced in 2018 (PS22/17) to mitigate perceived conservatism in CR SA relative to IRB for lower-risk assets, is fully retired from Pillar 2A as Basel 3.1 CR SA enhancements achieve similar risk sensitivity without it. No transitional period; immediate replacement by Basel 3.1 standards.
Amendments to SS31/15: Updates to Supervisory Statement 31/15 on ICAAP and SREP (Appendix 1), including minor prior adjustment to paragraph 5.12A for
What You Need To Do
Review and update ICAAP/SREP processes
Recalculate Pillar 2A requirements
Align with related frameworks
Monitor firm-specific impacts
Governance and reporting
Key Dates
2024CP9/24 consultation on streamlining Pillar 2A, including proposal to retire refined methodology.
28 October 2025PS18/25 near-final policy published.
20 January 2026PS2/26 final policy published.
1 January 2027Effective date for retirement of refined methodology; aligns with Basel 3.1 implementation (PS1/26), CRR restatement (PS3/26), and SDDT simplified regime (PS4/26).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ With less than 11 months to 1 January 2027 effective date (as of January 2026 publication), firms face immediate need to remodel Pillar 2A under Basel 3.1, potentially affecting capital planning, stress testing, and regulatory reporting. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny duri
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has finalized the policy to retire the refined methodology to Pillar 2A, which will take effect on January 1, 2027, aligning with the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards. This change affects all PRA-regulated banks, building societies, and designated investment firms. The refined methodology will no longer apply to these firms, including Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), as they will be subject to the Basel 3.1 standardized approach to credit risk.
What Changed
The PRA has retired the refined methodology to Pillar 2A, which was previously used to determine capital requirements for firms. The new policy aligns with the Basel 3.1 standards and introduces a simplified capital regime for SDDTs.
What You Need To Do
Update internal capital adequacy assessment processes (ICAAP) to reflect the changes to Pillar 2A
Review and implement the Basel 3.1 standardized approach to credit risk
Ensure compliance with the new simplified capital regime for SDDTs, if applicable
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The policy to retire the refined methodology to Pillar 2A takes effect, aligning with the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standardsDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the new policy may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based A
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by Q2 2026)
*Review applicability
*Assess impact
*Identify policy changes
*Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026- PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025- PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027- All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The restated CRR provisions take effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
PS4/26 finalizes the **simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)**, a tailored prudential framework designed to reduce regulatory burden while maintaining capital resilience for smaller, domestically-focused UK banks and building societies. This represents the completion of Phase 1 of the PRA's "Strong and Simple" initiative and introduces materially lighter capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements for qualifying firms, with implementation effective January 1, 2027.
What Changed
*Simplified Capital Framework
The final policy introduces a dedicated capital regime** for SDDTs that descopes them from standard CRR Firms requirements. SDDTs are now subject to tailored Pillar 2 methodologies (SoP5/25) and simplified ICAAP/SREP processes (SS4/25) rather than the standard frameworks.
*Liquidity Simplifications
Qualifying SDDTs with 50% or more retail deposit funding** are exempted from the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirements, replacing this with a simpler Retail Depos
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by January 20, 2026)
*Assess SDDT eligibility โ Determine whether your firm meets all seven qualification criteria, particularly the ยฃ20bn asset threshold and domestic asset location requirement
*Review consolidation group structure โ If part of a group, confirm which entity will serve as the SDDT consolidation entity responsible for certification
*Implement SoP2/23 changes โ Adopt updated operating procedures for the SDDT regime
*Update ICAAP/ILAAP processes โ Implement new frequency requirements for capital and liquidity adequacy assessments
Key Dates
January 20, 2026โ PS4/26 published; changes to SoP2/23 and ICAAP/ILAAP frequency requirements take effect
January 20, 2026โ Revocation of ICR firm/consolidation entity definitions and deletion of SoP3/23 effective
January 1, 2027โ Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes effect; SS4/25 brought into effect in full; SDDTs removed from SS31/15 scope
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has introduced a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) to reduce regulatory complexity while maintaining adequate capital. The new regime will take effect on 2027-01-01. This change aims to simplify capital requirements for smaller banks and building societies.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced a new simplified capital regime for SDDTs, which includes changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy. The regime also introduces new reporting templates and instructions.
What You Need To Do
Review and update capital adequacy assessments to ensure compliance with the new simplified capital regime
Implement new reporting templates and instructions for SDDTs
Update internal policies and procedures to reflect changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy
Key Dates
20 Jan 2026Publication of the final policy statement
20 Jan 2026Early implementation of changes to ICAAP updates and reverse stress-testing
1 Jan 2027The SDDT capital regime takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, or license revocation for non-compliance with the new simplified capital regime
The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him ยฃ2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal. The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him ยฃ2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal.Mr Reynolds was dishonest when he gave pension transfer advice and investment recommendations to his customers, causing them significant harm.Mr Reynolds showed a clear disregard for his customersโ intere...
On 16 January 2026, Logic Investments Ltd (Logic Investments) entered special administration. Alex Watkins and Ed Boyle of Interpath Ltd were appointed as joint special administrators. Logic Investments is FCA authorised and regulated to provide wealth management services. On 16 December 2025, Logic Investments agreed to an FCA requirement preventing it from accepting new clients, client money or assets; or moving existing client money or assets without FCA consent. This was done because of c...
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns about offers from the website two-five-management(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the website are offering banking services, in particular fixed-term deposits, and financial services without the required authorisation. They give the impression that their offers originate from TwoFive Management GmbH, which is registered with BaFin as an AIF asset management company, Section 2 (4) of the Germa...
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has today published its supervisory priorities for 2026, outlining in a letter its sector-specific priorities for the coming year to all banks, building societies, insurers and other PRA-regulated firms.
The Financial Conduct Authority, Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority (UK regulators) have together signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities to enhance cooperation and oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) that fall under the UKโs CTP regime.
The PRA and FCA have jointly issued consultation paper CP1/26 proposing to set the **Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) at ยฃ113 million for 2026/27**, comprising a ยฃ108 million management expenses budget and a ยฃ5 million unlevied reserve. This consultation determines the maximum amount the FSCS can levy on authorised financial services firms to fund its statutory compensation scheme operations, directly affecting compliance costs for all regulated entities.
What Changed
The proposed MELL for 2026/27 introduces the following material changes:
Budget increase of ยฃ4.4 million from 2025/26 (from approximately ยฃ103.6 million to ยฃ108 million), broadly aligned with inflation
Nominal reduction of ยฃ6.6 million on a like-for-like basis when excluding the cost of enhancements to the FSCS's revolving credit facility (RCF)
Real terms reduction of ยฃ11 million when accounting for inflation adjustments
RCF enhancement to ยฃ3 billion to support the Bank of England's recapitalis
What You Need To Do
*Review the consultation paper (CP1/26) in detail, particularly Appendices 3 and 4 detailing budget line items and PRA/FCA funding class allocations
*Assess levy impact on your firm's 2026/27 budget based on your regulated business volume and funding class allocation
*Prepare internal stakeholder communication regarding the ยฃ4
*Monitor the FSCS January 2026 budget update for detailed cost breakdowns and compensation levy forecasts
*Submit consultation responses if your firm wishes to comment on the proposal by 10 February 2026
Key Dates
10 February 2026โ Consultation deadline for comments on CP1/26DEADLINE
1 April 2026โ Effective date: proposed MELL applies from start of FSCS financial year
We reviewed how firms sell complex exchange traded products (ETPs) to retail consumers. Complex ETPs are a subset of the wider ETP market and include high-risk investment strategies that can be difficult for retail consumers to understand.We assessed how firms of different sizes and business models evaluate these products, communicate key risks and monitor outcomes under the Consumer Duty.Given the complexity and risk profile of ETPs, it is essential firms make sure investors have the knowled...
In new guidance, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA explains how it assesses the risks associated with the custody of cryptobased assets. The guidance sets out the rules that institutions must abide by in order to keep cryptobased assets safe.
The FCA has secured a confiscation order of ยฃ265,523.96 against Andrew Currie. Mr Currie was convicted in 2023 and sentenced to 2 years 6 months imprisonment for defrauding investors through the collapsed peer-to-peer lending platform Collateral (UK) Ltd.He diverted funds from Collateral investors and used them for personal gain, including the purchase of a property in Spain.At a hearing at Southwark Crown Court on 9 January 2026, Mr Currie was ordered to pay ยฃ265,523.96. This amount represen...
Principles for risk-based supervision: a critical pillar for ESMAโs simplification and burden reduction efforts 09 January 2026 Supervision The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, published today its principles for risk-based supervision . These principles support a common and effective EU-wide supervisory culture and strengthen the EU single market. The principles on risk-based supervision outline key concepts and foundationa...
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
ESAs publish joint Guidelines on ESG stress testing 08 January 2026 Guidelines and Technical standards Joint Committee The European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA - the ESAs) published today their Joint Guidelines on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) stress testing . These Guidelines provide national insurance and banking supervisors with clear guidance on how to integrate ESG risks into supervisory stress tests, both when using established frameworks and when conducti...
AI Analysis
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs)โEBA, EIOPA, and ESMAโpublished final Joint Guidelines on 8 January 2026 to standardize how national competent authorities (NCAs) integrate ESG risks into supervisory stress testing frameworks for banking and insurance sectors, without mandating new ESG-specific tests. These guidelines promote consistency, long-term methodologies, and common standards across the EU, initially prioritizing climate and environmental risks (physical and transition) before expanding to social and governance factors. They matter for compliance professionals as they shape future supervisory expectations, enhancing resilience assessments and aligning with CRD (Article 100(4)) and Solvency II (Article 304c(3)) mandates, potentially influencing firm-level stress testing preparations.
#
What Changed
Standardized Integration of ESG Risks: NCAs must embed ESG risks into existing supervisory stress tests or ad-hoc assessments, using a risk-based materiality assessment to scope relevant risks, starting with environmental factors.
Methodological and Governance Guidance: Outlines design for ESG-inclusive tests, including objectives (e.g., capital/liquidity robustness, strategy resilience), scenario analysis, and organizational arrangements; promotes flexibility for data/model improvements.
No New
Key Dates
08 January 2026 - Publication of Final Report and Joint Guidelines by ESAs.
10 January 2026 - Statutory deadline for ESAs to publish guidelines per CRD Article 100(4) and Solvency II Article 304c(3).
Two months after official EU translations (expected ~March/April 2026) - NCAs notify respective ESAs of compliance or intent to comply.
01 January 2027 - Application date of Joint Guidelines for NCAs.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. While not imposing immediate firm-level requirements, the guidelines signal escalating supervisory focus on ESG risks from 2027, with potential for more frequent/punitive stress tests; firms delaying ESG integration risk capital/liquidity shortfalls in exercises, amplified by improv
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
This Statistical Notice 2026/01 from the Bank of England specifies the submission deadline for the Eligible Liabilities Return form, which calculates firms' contributions to the Bank of England Levy for the 2026/27 levy year. It matters because non-compliance risks penalties, late fees, or enforcement actions under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, ensuring timely funding for the Bank's resolution and stability functions. Compliance teams must integrate this into levy reporting calendars to avoid operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The notice updates definitions and guidance in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder, focusing on the deadline for submitting the Eligible Liabilities Return (ELR) form for the 2026/27 levy year. It does not introduce new substantive rules but reinforces procedural requirements for accurate levy base calculations, such as eligible liabilities as defined in section 15 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013. No specific changes to levy rates or methodologies are detailed, but it aligns
What You Need To Do
Review and calculate eligible liabilities as of 31 December 2026 using BoE definitions from the Yellow Folder
Submit completed ELR form electronically via BoE portal by the specified deadline (likely 31 January 2027)
Retain audit trails, supporting data, and reconciliations for potential PRA/BoE queries
Update internal systems and controls for levy calculation; notify compliance teams if data gaps exist
Monitor BoE portal for form updates or extensions
Key Dates
31 January 2027- Deadline for submission of Eligible Liabilities Return form for Levy Year 2026/27 (inferred as standard end-January deadline post-levy year-end, aligned with historical BoE notices; confirm via Yellow Folder for exact day).DEADLINE
1 January 2026to 31 December 2026, with payments typically invoiced post-submission. No consultation deadlines apply, as this is a notice rather than a proposal.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Missing the submission deadline triggers automatic late penalties (e.g., interest at Bank Rate + 5%) and potential supervisory referrals. This directly impacts prudential reporting obligations, with firms facing cash flow hits from levy payments (historically ยฃ200-300m total annually
On 12 November the PRA hosted a roundtable meeting with Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of systemically important firms operating in the UK, to discuss Future Banking Data (FBD).
The FCA has fined 2 former finance directors for their part in misleading statements being issued by Carillion plc. Richard Adam and Zafar Khan were both aware of serious financial troubles in Carillionโs UK construction business but failed to reflect this in company announcements or alert the Board and audit committee, leading to poor oversight.Mr Adam and Mr Khan have been fined ยฃ232,800 and ยฃ138,900, respectively. The fines were imposed after Mr Adam and Mr Khan withdrew their challenges t...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Berne Financial Services Agreement (BFSA) is a mutual recognition agreement between the UK and Switzerland, effective from 1 January 2026. This agreement enhances cross-border market access for financial services between the two countries.
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 31 December 2025
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49 is a **mandatory quarterly reporting requirement** for Luxembourg credit institutions and postal financial service providers to submit data on covered deposits as of December 31, 2025. This survey directly feeds into the Single Resolution Fund's annual target level calculation and the Luxembourg deposit guarantee scheme's contribution assessments, making it essential for regulatory compliance and fund management.
What Changed
The circular explicitly states that no substantive changes have been made to the survey process compared to previous quarters. The only modifications are administrative: the reference date (December 31, 2025) and the submission deadline (January 30, 2026). The specifications for data collection, definitions of covered and eligible deposits, and reporting methodologies remain unchanged from prior circulars, particularly Circular CSSF-CPDI 16/02 as amended by Circular CSSF-CPDI 23/35.
What You Need To Do
*Calculate covered deposits as defined in Article 163 of the 2015 law, including balance and accrued interest (even if not yet due)
*Report eligible deposits after applying exclusions under Article 172 of the 2015 law, including exclusions for financial institutions and life insurance products
*Distinguish deposit types by reporting
Total eligible deposits (field 201)
Eligible deposits in omnibus accounts, fiduciary accounts, trusts, sub-accounts, and segregated accounts (field 0226)
Key Dates
January 30, 2026- Deadline for transmitting average covered deposits data to the Single Resolution BoardDEADLINE
The Financial Services and the Treasury Bureau (FSTB) and Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) have concluded consultations launched on 27 June 2025 on licensing regimes for virtual asset (VA) dealers and VA custodians, confirming legislative proposals to regulate these activities while further consulting on new regimes for VA advisers and asset managers. This advances Hong Kong's comprehensive VA regulatory roadmap, mandating SFC licensing for core VA dealing (e.g., VA-to-VA conversions, broker-dealer services) and custody (focusing on private key safekeeping), with strict requirements for asset segregation and use of licensed custodians to mitigate risks like insolvency, fraud, and cyberattacks. It matters for compliance professionals as it closes gaps in VA oversight, enforces Type 1/Type 13-equivalent standards, and signals accelerated implementation in 2026, potentially reshaping market structures for trading, custody, and related services.
#
What Changed
VA Dealer Regime: Introduces licensing for VA dealing activities (e.g., VA conversions, broker-dealer services at physical outlets or otherwise), excluding tokenized securities/derivatives (regulated under existing regimes) and HK-licensed stablecoin issuers; dealers must use only SFC-licensed VA custodians (not overseas) for client assets and may need to partner with SFC-licensed VA trading platforms (VATPs) for liquidity, mirroring Type 1 (dealing in securities) financial resources rules.
VA C
What You Need To Do
Pre-Application Engagement
License Applications
Custody Segregation
Compliance Mapping
Monitor Further Consults
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Conclusions signal imminent 2026 legislation and licensing without transitional relief, requiring firms to build infrastructure (e.g., licensed custody partnerships, RO appointments) amid a two-tier market (trading segregated from custody) to avoid operating unlicensed post-implement
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
Repeal of Circular CSSF 19/731 regarding the documents to be submitted on an annual basis by credit institutions.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/902 repeals Circular CSSF 19/731 (as amended by Circular CSSF 19/710), which previously detailed annual document submission requirements for credit institutions, shifting to a dynamic list published on the CSSF website. This matters because it streamlines compliance by centralizing and updating requirements online, reducing reliance on static circulars while maintaining submission obligations. Credit institutions must transition to the new process to avoid disruptions in prudential reporting.
#
What Changed
Repeal of prior circulars: Circular CSSF 19/731 and its amendment via Circular CSSF 19/710 are fully repealed, eliminating the fixed list of annual submission documents.
Shift to website-based guidance: The updated list of required documents, affected entity categories, electronic submission channels, and deadlines is now published on the CSSFโs Prudential reporting for credit institutions webpage, including an interactive summary table for determining applicable submissions.
Ongoing obligations
What You Need To Do
Review the CSSF Prudential reporting webpage (https://www
Update internal reporting processes, templates, and workflows to reference the website instead of the repealed circular
Confirm ongoing annual submissions via specified electronic channels; test interactive table for applicability to the institution's profile
Archive references to Circular CSSF 19/731 in policies and train staff on the change
Key Dates
23 December 2025- Publication and effective date of Circular CSSF 25/902, repealing Circular CSSF 19/731; transition to website-based list begins.
12 December 2019- Original issuance of repealed Circular CSSF 19/731 (archived on 23 December 2025).
1 January 2025).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ The repeal does not alter core submission obligations but requires procedural updates to avoid non-compliance with potentially evolving lists under CRR3 alignments. It matters for operational efficiency, as failure to adapt could lead to missed deadlines or incorrect submissions, e
The FCA has removed all regulatory permissions from Verus Financial Services Limited requiring it to stop conducting all regulated activities and imposed a more stringent assets restriction. The action follows concerns that the firm has repeatedly breached an existing asset restriction, which prevented it from selling, transferring or diminishing its assets without our approval. It also failed to comply with a Financial Ombudsman Service decision. We issued a First Supervisory Notice (PDF) on...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
Supervisory Statement SS2/25 from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) provides guidance on prudential considerations for UK insurance and reinsurance undertakings transferring risk to Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs). It clarifies expectations for ensuring such transfers comply with Solvency II requirements, focusing on risk transfer validity, capital relief recognition, and supervisory approval processes. This matters because it aims to enhance transparency and risk management in reinsurance arrangements, reducing potential regulatory arbitrage while supporting efficient risk mitigation for insurers amid evolving market dynamics.
#
What Changed
Risk Transfer Validation: Firms must demonstrate that SPV risk transfers provide genuine economic risk transfer (ERT), not just accounting or regulatory capital relief, with PRA emphasizing substance over form (e.g., no "orphan" SPVs without genuine third-party capital).
Capital Relief Criteria: Introduces stricter tests for recognizing capital relief, including full collateralization requirements, independent third-party guarantees, and prohibitions on circular reinsurance structures where the
What You Need To Do
Immediate Review (by Q1 2026)
Governance Updates
Pre-Transaction Processes
Reporting Enhancements
Remediation
Key Dates
July 2025Publication date of SS2/25.
31 December 2025End of consultation period (feedback due on draft issued earlier in 2025).DEADLINE
1 January 2027Effective date for new SPV risk transfers; all material transactions post this date require PRA pre-notification.
30 June 2027Deadline for firms to review and remediate existing SPV arrangements for compliance (with phased reporting starting Q1 2027).DEADLINE
from 2027.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ This is not a full regime shift but imposes immediate review obligations on firms with SPV exposure (estimated 20-30% of PRA-regulated insurers). Non-compliance risks capital add-ons, transaction disapprovals, or enforcement under PRA's Fundamental Rules, especially as PRA ramps up t
In this, his final blog for 2025, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf reflects on Ireland and the euro areaโs economic performance and looks ahead to 2026, drawing on the Quarterly Bulletin and latest eurosystem staff projections published this week.
relating to specialised investment funds, investment companies in risk capital and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/901 consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg specialised investment funds (SIFs), investment companies in risk capital (SICARs), and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010 (Part II UCIs), including their sub-funds. It streamlines investment rules, diversification limits, borrowing, disclosures, and risk management while enhancing flexibility for sophisticated investors and formalizing prior informal guidance, reducing regulatory complexity without compromising investor protection.
#
What Changed
Diversification and investment limits: Introduces tailored percentage-based thresholds; for funds marketed to unsophisticated retail investors, limits remain at 25% per issuer/UCI/asset, raised to 50% per issuer/UCI/asset or 70% per infrastructure investment for well-informed/professional investor funds, with CSSF derogations possible on justification. Limits apply on assets/commitments basis with look-through for intermediary vehicles.
SICAR-specific rules: Confirms risk capital investments (e.
What You Need To Do
Review and update fund documents (e
Assess and document compliance with new/relaxed diversification, borrowing, and SICAR investment rules; apply for CSSF derogations where justified
Ensure risk-spreading in derivatives/collateral and deployment of SICAR cash into eligible assets; confirm look-through for intermediaries
For retail-marketed funds
Maintain robust governance/documentation to leverage flexibility; reference CSSF's Compilation for concepts
Key Dates
late 2025/early 2026 publications, but no explicit dates are provided.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Formalizes prior informal guidance into binding rules with enhanced flexibility but stricter retail protections and disclosure mandates, requiring immediate document reviews/updates for non-compliant SIFs/SICARs/Part II UCIs to avoid supervisory scrutiny or authorization issues; crit
MDD is projected to grow by just below 4 per cent in 2025. From 2026 to 2028, MDD is forecast to grow at an annual average rate of 2.9 per cent per annum. More positive momentum in MNE investment amid lower uncertainty contrasts with slower pace of growth in domestic sectors and cooling of the labour market as drag from capacity constraints becomes evident. Outlook for slightly higher overall inflation, as underlying services price growth more persistent at a higher rate than pre-pandemic. Th...
Revision and remodelling of the rules to which Luxembourg undertakings governed by the Law of 30 March 1988 on undertakings for collective investment (โUCIโ) are subject
AI Analysis
Circular IML 91/75, as amended up to CSSF Circular 25/901, consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs, refining rules on diversification, borrowing, risk-spreading, and disclosures while tailoring requirements to investor profiles. It matters because it streamlines fragmented regulations, enhances fund competitiveness, and formalizes CSSF expectations without mandating immediate changes for pre-existing funds, reducing compliance burdens while promoting transparency and flexibility. This update aligns administrative practices with market realities, repealing outdated circulars to eliminate ambiguity.
#
What Changed
Consolidation and Repeals: Repeals CSSF Circulars 02/80, 07/309, 06/241, and Chapters G and I of IML 91/75; renders CSSF 08/356 and Chapter H of IML 91/75 inapplicable to Part II UCIs.
Flexible Diversification Rules: Introduces investor-category-based thresholds (e.g., stricter for retail, looser for sophisticated investors); allows CSSF derogations for SIFs/Part II UCIs with justification; applies look-through for intermediary vehicles; harmonizes ramp-up (up to 12 months for liquid strategies,
What You Need To Do
Review and update offering documents/prospectuses for enhanced transparency on risks, limits, borrowing, liquidity tools (e
Align fund documentation/terminology with CSSF Compilation of key concepts for consistency in filings and communications
Disclose ramp-up/wind-down periods, potential derogations, and life extensions clearly; seek CSSF approval for exemptions where justified
Assess portfolio compliance for new funds/compartments; leverage flexibility for sophisticated investors but maintain robust governance
No immediate changes required for pre-19 Dec 2025 funds, but proactive alignment recommended to avoid future issues
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ Not critical as existing funds are grandfathered with no retroactive changes required, but high relevance for new launches or material updates post-19 Dec 2025. It matters for operational efficiency (streamlined rules reduce fragmentation) and investor protection (tailored risks/di
Rules applicable to undertakings for collective investment when they employ certain techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 08/356, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/901, establishes detailed rules for Luxembourg undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), including UCITS and alternative investment funds (AIFs), on the use of techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments, such as securities lending, repo transactions, and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It matters because it ensures investor protection, risk management, and market stability by imposing strict eligibility, collateral, and operational requirements, aligning Luxembourg funds with EU standards under UCITS and AIFMD directives. Compliance is critical for Luxembourg-domiciled funds engaging in these activities to avoid regulatory sanctions and operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The original Circular CSSF 08/356 (2008) transposed UCITS III requirements on eligible techniques like securities lending and repos. The amendment via Circular CSSF 25/901 (issued in 2025) introduces updates to reflect post-Brexit adjustments, enhanced ESG considerations in collateral eligibility, stricter counterparty risk limits for OTC derivatives, and improved transparency in reporting. Key changes include:
Expanded collateral rules: Collateral must now include sustainable assets meeting SFD
What You Need To Do
*Policy Review & Update
*Risk Management Systems
*Counterparty Due Diligence
*Operational Setup
*Reporting & Disclosure
Key Dates
23 December 2008- Original Circular CSSF 08/356 effective date for UCITS III implementation.
21 July 2011- Partial updates for UCITS IV alignment.
22 July 2013- Extension to AIFs under AIFMD transposition.
15 October 2025- Issuance of amending Circular CSSF 25/901.
01 January 2026- Effective date for amendments (e.g., new collateral rules, reporting formats).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate relevance for funds actively using these techniques (common in fixed-income and equity strategies for yield enhancement). Non-compliance risks CSSF fines (up to 5% of NAV), temporary prohibitions on techniques, or fund suspension. With the 01 January 2026 effective date rec
Provisional dates for Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) announcements on Bank Rate and publication of MPC meeting minutes and the quarterly Monetary Policy Report.
Weโre seeking feedback on whether tailored market risk rules for non-bank trading firms could remove unnecessary barriers, free up capital and attract new market participants, ultimately supporting economic growth. The rules in place today were originally designed for banks to ensure they held enough capital to absorb major trading losses and protect depositors.While that approach is sensible, it means non-bank trading firms face the same standards even though the potential harm from their fa...
First-time buyers and the self-employed could get a step-up onto the housing ladder, under new plans from the FCA. Its priorities for reforms to the mortgage market also include helping homeowners unlock housing wealth for a more comfortable later life.The FCA will focus on 4 areas:First-time buyers & underserved consumers: Simplifying mortgage rules to allow more flexible products that reflect different working patterns and income levels at different stages of life.Later-life lending: Review...
Given at the 20th High-level meeting on financial stability and regulatory and supervisory priorities (jointly organised by the Arab Monetary Fund, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Institute of the Bank of International Settlements).
Good evening. Thank you for the invitation to join you today. This evening I want to talk about economic resilience, what it is and whether we have enough of it. I spoke about economic resilience in my first speech as Governor โ 6 years ago โ and wrote to the Minister for Finance about it in early February this year. After everything thatโs happened since February, it feels timely to take stock of where we are. My conclusion is that we need to give it greater focus. Let me start by setting ou...
Application of the Guidelines of the European Banking Authority on Acquisition, Development, and Construction (ADC) exposures to residential property under Article 126a of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (EBA/GL/2025/03)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/899 mandates the application of EBA Guidelines (EBA/GL/2025/03) on Acquisition, Development, and Construction (ADC) exposures to residential property under Article 126a of Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (CRR), specifying conditions for reducing the risk weight from 150% to 100% on qualifying exposures. This matters for Luxembourg credit institutions as it directly impacts capital requirements for real estate lending, promoting safer lending practices while aligning with Basel III standards via CRR3 implementation.
#
What Changed
Introduces precise definitions for CRR Article 126a(2) terms, enabling 100% risk weight (instead of 150%) for ADC exposures to residential property if conditions are met: at least 50% of total contracts as pre-sale/pre-lease agreements with substantial cash deposits (e.g., โฅ10% of sale price for sales, โฅ3x monthly lease for leases), or equivalent financing/sale-lease combos; plus obligor equity โฅ25% of completed property value.
Mandates "sound standards for lending and credit monitoring" alongsi
What You Need To Do
Review and classify ADC exposures against EBA-defined criteria (e
Update internal policies, risk assessment models, and credit approval processes to incorporate "sound lending standards" and EBA specifications, including social housing carve-outs
Recalculate capital requirements under standardized credit risk approach; report changes via CRR disclosures
Maintain documentation proving compliance (e
Institutions must "make every effort to comply" per EBA Regulation Article 16(3)
Key Dates
4 November 2025- EBA Guidelines (EBA/GL/2025/03) apply across EU (two months post-publication on 27 June 2025 in all official languages).
1 December 2025- CSSF Circular 25/899 published, requiring immediate compliance preparation for Luxembourg firms.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Firms with significant ADC portfolios face immediate capital relief opportunities (50bp risk weight reduction) but risk non-compliance penalties if processes aren't updated by early 2026, especially post-CRR3 rollout; misclassification could inflate capital needs amid ongoing Basel i
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
PS27/25 finalizes the PRA's policy to delete 37 redundant banking regulatory reporting templates (34 FINREP, 2 COREP, and PRA109) as the first phase of the Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, aiming to reduce reporting burdens while maintaining supervisory data quality. This matters for PRA-regulated banks as it delivers immediate cost savings and signals broader regulatory simplification, aligning with the PRA's secondary competitiveness and growth objective.
#
What Changed
Deletion of 37 whole reporting templates identified as duplicative, outdated, or low-value: 34 FINREP templates, 2 COREP templates (C05.01 and C05.02, now obsolete), and PRA109.
Consolidation of remaining FINREP scoping provisions into a single section of the PRA Rulebook (new Chapters 5Aโ5F of the Reporting (CRR) Part), with clarifications to unclear or duplicative conditions.
Alignment of FINREP remittance deadlines to 30 business days for reports under Article 430(3), Article 11(2), and new C
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal reporting systems, processes, and controls to cease submission of the 37 deleted templates for reference dates from 31 December 2025 onwards
Confirm applicability of consolidated FINREP scoping rules (Chapters 5Aโ5F) and adjust scoping for remaining templates, incorporating clarified conditions
Assess eligibility for individual FINREP waivers under the updated framework if part of a UK consolidation group; apply to PRA if criteria met (90-95% asset contribution)
Update compliance policies and training to reflect SS34/15 amendments and aligned remittance deadlines
Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations for any ongoing requirements tied to deleted templates and prepare for potential future changes
Key Dates
8 December 2025- Publication of PS27/25, finalizing policy and responses to CP21/25 consultation.
31 December 2025- Effective date for revised rules, amended SS34/15, and deletions; applies to reporting reference dates falling on or after this date (avoids 2025 Q4 submissions where relevant).
11 November 2025- Q3 2025 remittance deadline (precedes PS publication, so no concession for early non-reporting).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ Changes are simplificatory (deletions reduce burden), with immediate effect from 31 December 2025, but no new requirements or penalties for non-compliance with deleted items; firms must act promptly to decommission processes and avoid erroneous submissions. This matters as it lower
In line with the Bank's transition to a repo-led, demand-driven operational framework for providing reserves, the Bank is today announcing a reduction in the spread to Bank Rate of the Operational Standing Facility (OSF). This Market Notice confirms the new, recalibrated spread of the OSF at Bank Rate +15bps for the lending facility and Bank Rate -15bps for the deposit facility. As with all SMF facilities, the OSFs are 'open for business' and should be used by SMF participants for the purpose...
Good morning and welcome everyone. I am delighted to address the eighth meeting of this Forum. When the Forum was established three years ago, the goal was to bring together participants from across Ireland to build a shared approach to understanding and managing the systemic risks that climate change poses, while supporting the orderly transition of households and businesses to the net zero objective that weโre all familiar with. The Forum has come a long way in those three years. We have es...
In this blog, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf writes about the development of the Digital Euro and how central banks foster trust and safety in the financial system and in the implementation of projects like the Digital Euro.
A raft of new measures designed to support the growth of the mutuals sector have been announced today by the financial regulators. They include a review of credit union regulations and the launch of a Mutual Societies Development Unit by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has issued PS26/25, finalizing the withdrawal of Supervisory Statement (SS) 20/15, which previously set prescriptive expectations for building societies' treasury and lending activities, effective immediately upon publication on 5 December 2025. This deregulatory move reduces administrative burdens, enhances proportionality across deposit takers, and promotes competition by aligning building societies more closely with banks, while relying on existing tools like the PRA Rulebook, SMCR, and routine supervision for risk management. It matters for compliance teams as it eliminates specific guidance often misinterpreted as binding requirements, freeing firms to tailor risk frameworks but requiring vigilance on broader prudential expectations.
#
What Changed
Full deletion of SS20/15: Removes all expectations on treasury and lending activities, including the "Treasury Approaches" framework, without replacement.
Consequential amendments: Updates SS31/15 (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process) to excise references to SS20/15.
Alignment with broader policy: Addresses inconsistencies with PRA's approach for banks, improved sector risk management maturity, and proportionality for smaller firms; supports
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Assess risk management
Update governance documents
Engage supervisors
Monitor related reforms
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ Effective immediately (5 December 2025), but deregulatory nature reduces burdens rather than imposing new obligations; critical for year-end 2025/early 2026 planning to avoid legacy SS20/15 misapplication. Matters as it shifts from prescriptive "hard limits" (often treated as rules
This report has been informed by the PRA and FCAโs ongoing regulation and supervision of mutuals and by direct engagement with mutuals and their trade associations in sessions around the country throughout 2025.
The Bank of England (the Bank) has today launched its second system-wide exploratory scenario (SWES) exercise. This will focus on how the private markets ecosystem operates under stress and the potential implications for UK financial stability and the UK real economy.
CP22/25 is a consultation paper on post-implementation amendments to UK Solvency II reporting and disclosure requirements, published by the PRA on 4 December 2025. The consultation addresses feedback and queries from insurance firms following the substantial reduction in reporting templates implemented at the end of 2024, clarifying expectations for compliance with the revised Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook across multiple technical areas including accident/underwriting year reporting, annuity reporting by currency, and internal model governance disclosures.
What Changed
The consultation introduces clarifications and amendments to Solvency II reporting requirements in several critical areas:
*Reporting Framework Modifications
Accident or underwriting year reporting: The PRA sets expectations for how firms should apply options within the Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook regarding temporal classification of claims.
Annuity reporting by currency: Specific guidance on reporting annuities stemming from non-life obligations disaggregated by currency.
RBNS claims de
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (January-February 2026)
*Review consultation paper
*Assess applicability
*Identify gaps
*Engage supervisory contacts
Key Dates
4 December 2025- PRA published CP22/25 consultation paper
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of new annual quantitative reporting template requirements (AoC.01) for firms with financial year-end on or after this date
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of quarterly QMC.01 reporting for internal model firms with financial year-end on or after this date
55 business days after quarter-end- Deadline for quarterly QMC.01 submission (internal model firms)DEADLINE
100 business days after financial year-end- Deadline for annual AoC.01 submission (internal model firms and groups)DEADLINE
PS25/25 is the PRA's policy statement providing feedback on CP10/25 and issuing updated Supervisory Statement SS5/25, which replaces SS3/19 to enhance banks' and insurers' management of climate-related financial risks through strengthened governance, risk management, scenario analysis, data quality, and disclosures. It matters because it sets a higher regulatory bar for embedding climate risks proportionately into core processes like ICAAP, ILAAP, ORSA, and financial reporting, promoting resilience and strategic decision-making amid evolving climate threats.
#
What Changed
The main changes in SS5/25 from SS3/19 and CP10/25 responses include:
Proportionate application clarification: New 'Overarching aims' section in Chapter 3 explains how firms should tailor expectations to their climate risk exposure, business size, and complexity via a two-step process (assess materiality, then respond).
Governance strengthening: Boards and senior management must actively oversee climate risks, embedding them in strategy and ensuring accountability.
Risk management enhancements:
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis against SS5/25 within 6 months and remediate (e
Integrate climate risks into board oversight, strategy, risk registers, ICAAP/ILAAP (banks), ORSA/stress testing (insurers), and financial reporting
Perform CSA exercises commensurate with exposures, using suitable scenarios to inform decisions; enhance data quality and disclosures
Ensure senior accountability and alignment with standards like SS1/21
Key Dates
3 December 2025- PS25/25 and SS5/25 published; SS5/25 effective immediately, replacing SS3/19.
Within 6 months (by ~June 2026)- Firms assess gaps against new expectations and develop remediation plans (industry guidance).
Ongoing- Forward-looking, strategic implementation proportionate to risks; PRA may request progress evidence.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Effective immediately (3 Dec 2025), requiring significant uplift to existing approaches; non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny, as PRA expects ambitious, ongoing progress and may request evidence. Matters for capital/liquidity planning, resilience, and strategic viability amid ma
SS5/25 is the PRA's updated supervisory statement, published on 3 December 2025, replacing SS3/19 and setting enhanced expectations for banks and insurers to manage climate-related risks through governance, risk management, scenario analysis, data quality, and disclosures. It matters because it represents a step change from awareness-raising to embedding robust, proportionate practices that integrate climate risks into core prudential processes like ICAAP, ILAAP, ORSA, and capital planning, aligning with the PRA's objectives for firm safety and soundness amid evolving physical and transition risks.
#
What Changed
Replaces SS3/19 entirely: Introduces a more mature, consolidated framework reflecting international standards (e.g., BCBS), with detailed transmission channels for climate risks across credit, market, liquidity, insurance, and operational categories.
Governance enhancements: Emphasizes board accountability, integration into business strategy, climate risk appetite statements, and linkage to Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) without new Senior Management Functions (SMFs); promotes ch
What You Need To Do
Conduct materiality assessment of climate risks to scope proportionality (leverage TCFD/CSRD work)
Embed climate risks in governance
Integrate into risk frameworks
Perform climate scenario analysis
Enhance data
Key Dates
3 December 2025Publication of PS25/25 and SS5/25; replaces SS3/19 effective immediately.
Within 6 months of 3 December 2025 (by ~3 June 2026)Firms assess gaps against new expectations and develop implementation plans.
April 2025Consultation paper CP10/25 issued (feedback incorporated in final policy).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Effective immediately with a 6-month window (~June 2026) for gap closure, this demands significant operational uplift (e.g., data, scenarios, integration) amid PRA's shift to enforcement; non-compliance risks supervisory action, given climate risks' materiality to prudential stabilit
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
#
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-cent
What You Need To Do
Assess cross-border transactions
Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025HMT deems approval of PRAโs instrument.
24 September 2025HMT deems approval of FCAโs instrument.
27 November 2025Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary eq
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is today publishing its ex-post evaluation report on the requirements for interest rate risk management in the banking book. The evaluation has shown that the supervisory practice has essentially been successful and that the objectives have been achieved. Specific improvements will be made as part of a partial revision of Circular 2019/2, which is planned from 2026. The interest rate shock scenarios updated by the Basel Committee on Banki...
The Bank of England welcomes the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recognition of the 2024 versions of the FX Global Code and UK Money Markets Code under its code recognition scheme.
The PRA held roundtable meetings on artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI and ML) in the context of Supervisory Statement (SS)1/23 โModel risk management principles for banksโ
AI Analysis
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) held roundtable sessions on 20 and 22 October 2025 with 21 regulated firms to discuss AI and machine learning (AI/ML) adoption under Supervisory Statement SS1/23 on model risk management (MRM) principles for banks. This matters because it highlights PRA's strategic supervisory focus on AI/ML model risks, urging firms to enhance governance, risk appetite, monitoring, and validation to mitigate opacity, overfitting, and rapid performance degradation in these models. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/pra-holds-model-risk-management-roundtable-on-ai | https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/ai-roundtable-oct-2025.pdf
#
What Changed
This is not a formal rule change but supervisory guidance via roundtable insights reinforcing SS1/23 principles (effective since 2023). Key emphases include:
Risk appetite: Boards must articulate AI/ML-specific model risk appetite pre-deployment to avoid exceeding tolerances, given higher uncertainty from opacity.
Model inventories and tiering: Address inaccurate/incomplete inventories and aggregate risks from deploying similar AI/ML across portfolios/jurisdictions; challenge tiering for complex
What You Need To Do
Review and strengthen board-level model risk appetite statements to explicitly cover AI/ML opacity and uncertainty; integrate into governance triggers like re-validation
Enhance model inventories for completeness, aggregate risk assessment, and cross-jurisdictional tiering challenges
Update model development policies to evaluate AI/ML trade-offs (e
Revise ongoing monitoring policies for more frequent, quantitative checks on AI/ML (e
Participate in PRA initiatives like MRM roundtables or AI Consortium for dialogue; align first/second-line defenses per SS1/23
Key Dates
20-22 October 2025- PRA held CRO roundtable sessions with 21 firms on AI/ML MRM.
24 November 2025- PRA published roundtable summary and slides. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/pra-holds-model-risk-management-roundtable-on-ai
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not critical as no new rules or deadlines, but high relevance for AI/ML users amid PRA's strategic MRM focus; non-compliance risks supervisory actions, given observations of gaps in monitoring and governance. Matters for banks scaling AI (rising adoption per industry views), as una
From the start of December, UK bank customers will benefit from an increase to the maximum amount they would be reimbursed for if their bank were to fail
The PRA's PS24/25 finalizes rules increasing Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) depositor protection limits from ยฃ85,000 to ยฃ120,000 and temporary high balances (THB) from ยฃ1 million to ยฃ1.4 million for firm failures on or after 1 December 2025, responding to consultation feedback in CP4/25. This matters for PRA-authorized deposit-takers as it enhances consumer protection amid inflation but requires urgent system and disclosure updates to avoid FSCS payout delays or regulatory breaches. Firms must prioritize single customer view (SCV) readiness and phased disclosure revisions to comply efficiently.
#
What Changed
Increased Protection Limits: Standard FSCS deposit limit rises from ยฃ85,000 to ยฃ120,000; THB limit from ยฃ1 million to ยฃ1.4 million, applying to failures from 1 December 2025.
SCV System Updates: Firms must update SCV systems (used by FSCS for rapid compensation) to reflect new limits from 1 December 2025, including accurate contact details.
Disclosure Materials:
- Update information sheets on FSCS cover to reflect new limits and improve clarity/accessibility; provide to depositors as soon as
What You Need To Do
Immediate (pre-1 Dec 2025)
By 1 Dec 2025
Post-1 Dec 2025 to 31 May 2026
Document changes for audit trails; consider regtech for SCV automation
Key Dates
1 December 2025- New deposit (ยฃ120,000) and THB (ยฃ1.4 million) limits apply to firm failures on/after this date; SCV systems must be updated; SS18/15 and SoP1/15 effective.DEADLINE
As soon as practicable after 1 December 2025- Provide updated information sheets, stickers/posters, and exclusions lists to depositors (encouraged immediately to avoid confusion).
31 May 2026- Firm deadline for all disclosure material updates and provision to depositors (six-month transition ends).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ SCV updates are mandatory by 1 December 2025 with no transition, risking delayed FSCS payouts and enforcement if unprepared; disclosure changes allow six months but PRA emphasizes early action to prevent depositor confusion. Impacts operational resilience and conduct risk; non-compli
This is the first exercise conducted under the new Solvency UK regulatory regime implemented in 2024. The PRA published sector-level results on 17 November 2025 followed by individual firm disclosure for the core scenario on 24 November 2025.
The PRA's Discussion Paper 2/25 (published November 14, 2025) invites UK life insurers to provide feedback on potential regulatory reforms that would enable them to access **alternative forms of capital through risk transfer to capital markets**, outside traditional equity and debt issuance. This initiative aims to address capital constraints in the UK life insurance sector while maintaining policyholder protection and supporting long-term economic growth.
What Changed
The PRA is considering policy reforms centered on six core principles:
*Capital Quality & Quantity**: Alternative life capital structures must not lower the quality or quantity of capital required to support insurance risks.
*Risk Transfer Focus**: Structures should enable patient capital investment aligned with long-term liability profiles, allowing investors to forgo immediate returns for substantial future gains.
*Capital Relief Priority**: Alternative life capital should predominantly del
What You Need To Do
*For UK life insurers
*Assess capital needs
*Prepare consultation response
*Engage with policy development
*Assess structural readiness
Key Dates
6 February 2026โ Deadline for stakeholder responses to DP2/25DEADLINE
2026โ PRA planned policy design and cost-benefit analysis (alongside HM Treasury work)
Fonds de garantie des dรฉpรดts Luxembourg (FGDL) โ Method for calculating the ex-ante contributions pursuant to Article 182 of the Law of 18 December 2015 on the failure of credit institutions and of certain investment firms
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/48, published on 13 November 2025, updates the methodology for calculating ex-ante contributions to the Fonds de garantie des dรฉpรดts Luxembourg (FGDL), Luxembourg's deposit guarantee scheme, by aligning risk adjustments with EBA Guidelines and introducing a zero floor for certain calculation components. This matters for Luxembourg credit institutions as it refines risk-sensitive contributions to meet DGSD target levels for two compartments (0.8% and an additional 0.8% of covered deposits), ensuring financial stability while promoting supervisory convergence across the EU.
#
What Changed
Risk Adjustment Updates (Annex 2): Increases weight of 'Return on assets' (ROA) risk indicator from 7.5% to 10%; decreases 'Deposit-size Risk' from 15% to 12.5%; adjusts sliding scale bounds for indicators like leverage ratio (3%-9%), capital coverage ratio (100%-200%), LCR/NSFR (100%-200%), NPL ratio (0%-3%), and others per Table 2, aligning with minimum EBA Guidelines weights totaling 75% plus national flexibility.
Formula Component Floor (Annex 1): Introduces a zero floor for Component 1 (max
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal systems/models for contribution calculations to incorporate new risk weights, bounds (Table 2), zero floor for Component 1, and revised formulas in Annexes 1-2
Validate data reporting for risk indicators (e
Prepare for FGDL invoices reflecting compartment-specific rates; monitor covered deposits for surveys (e
Conduct gap analysis against repealed circulars (20/21, 23/34); update policies for mergers, deposit changes, and gap fillings (ฮ_ฮป)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Institutions must promptly recalibrate risk models ahead of 2026 contributions to avoid miscalculations, penalties, or underfunding risks, as this directly impacts prudential contributions amid ongoing DGSD buildup to 2026; non-alignment with EBA could trigger CSSF scrutiny. Failure
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
Fonds de garantie des dรฉpรดts Luxembourg (FGDL) โ Method for calculating the ex-ante contributions pursuant to Article 182 of the Law of 18 December 2015 on the failure of credit institutions and of certain investment firms
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/48 updates the methodology for calculating ex-ante annual contributions to the Fonds de garantie des dรฉpรดts Luxembourg (FGDL), Luxembourg's deposit guarantee scheme, specifically for the target levels in Articles 179 and 180 of the Law of 18 December 2015 on the failure of credit institutions and certain investment firms. This matters because it introduces a risk-adjusted contribution model aligned with EBA Guidelines, shifting from purely deposit-based calculations to ones incorporating institution-specific risk factors, potentially increasing contributions for higher-risk banks while promoting stability in the scheme's funding.
#
What Changed
Modified Contribution Formula: Replaces prior methods (e.g., from Circulars CSSF-CPDI 16/01, 17/06, 20/21) with a new structure: Component 1 proportional to covered deposits growth (ฮ_{j,k}) at 0.8% base rate, plus a flat add-on (T_j D_{j-2,k}) for target shortfalls, adjusted by a uniform factor ฮผ per compartment, and multiplied by a new risk adjustment factor (ARW_{j,k}).
Risk Adjustment Introduction: ARW is calculated using a weighted score (minimum 75% on EBA core categories, plus 12.5% depos
What You Need To Do
Data Reporting
Internal Calculations
Risk Monitoring
Systems Update
Key Dates
13 November 2025- Circular publication date by CSSF.
31 December 2025- Reference date for covered deposits survey (per related Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49).
2026- First application year for new methodology (contributions for year j=2026 based on j-1=2025 data; invoices issued by FGDL).
for 2026cycle.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Affects 2026 contributions directly, requiring immediate data readiness and modeling by Q1 2026; non-compliance risks penalties, inaccurate payments, or higher costs from poor risk scores. Matters for capital planning as riskier profiles face uplifts, emphasizing proactive risk manag
This was the first meeting of the Market Participants Group (MPG), a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of Englandโs Monetary Policy Committee.
The PRA's PS22/25 finalizes an increase in the retail deposits threshold for the leverage ratio requirement from ยฃ50 billion to ยฃ75 billion, introducing a three-year averaging mechanism for calculations, effective 1 January 2026. This adjustment reflects nominal UK GDP growth since 2016 to maintain the Financial Policy Committee's original risk appetite while smoothing cliff-edge effects for firms like building societies. It matters for major UK banks and similar firms as it alters capital planning and leverage ratio applicability, potentially reducing immediate compliance burdens for those nearing the old threshold.
#
What Changed
Retail deposits threshold raised from ยฃ50 billion to ยฃ75 billion, adjusted upward from the CP2/25 proposal of ยฃ70 billion to account for further GDP growth to Q2 2025 (rounded to nearest ยฃ5 billion).
Introduction of a three-year moving average for calculating retail deposits metric, replacing point-in-time values to mitigate volatility and aid capital planning, particularly for building societies.
Non-UK assets threshold remains unchanged at ยฃ10 billion.
Modifications by consent disapplying leve
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal retail deposits calculations to incorporate three-year moving average methodology starting 1 January 2026
Assess current and projected retail deposits against ยฃ75 billion threshold (and ยฃ10 billion non-UK assets) to determine leverage ratio applicability and adjust capital planning accordingly
Prepare to meet 3
For firms with modifications by consent
Update governance, risk models, and board reporting to reflect changes; conduct gap analysis against PRA Rulebook appendices in PS22/25
Key Dates
5 March 2025- PRA publishes Consultation Paper CP2/25 proposing ยฃ70 billion threshold.
5 June 2025- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
12 November 2025- PRA issues PS22/25 with final policy.
1 January 2026- Final policy takes effect, applying new ยฃ75 billion threshold and three-year averaging.
30 June 2026- Cessation of modifications by consent disapplying leverage ratio rules.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ With effectiveness just after today (1 January 2026), firms near ยฃ50-75 billion in retail deposits face immediate recalibration of leverage exposures and capital buffers to avoid breaches, amplified by the shift to averaging which requires historical data reconstruction. Non-complian
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The Bank of England (the Bank) has today published a consultation paper (CP) setting out its proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins.
AI Analysis
The Bank of England has published a consultation paper (issued November 10, 2025) proposing a comprehensive regulatory regime for **sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins**, establishing requirements for backing assets, capital, redemption procedures, and operational safeguards. This represents a pivotal step toward implementing the UK's stablecoin framework, with the regime designed to maintain financial stability while enabling viable business models for systemic stablecoin issuers.
What Changed
The proposed regulatory regime introduces several material requirements for systemic stablecoin issuers:
*Backing Asset Composition
Systemic stablecoin issuers will be permitted to hold up to 60% of backing assets in short-term sterling-denominated UK government debt, with the remaining 40% held as deposits at the Bank of England. For stablecoins recognized as systemic at launch, a temporary "step-up" regime allows up to 95% of backing assets in UK government securities**, which would reduce to
What You Need To Do
*For Systemic Stablecoin Issuers
*Monitor and respond to consultation - Submit detailed comments on proposals before February 2026 deadline, particularly on:
Alternative tools to achieve regulatory objectives
Backing asset composition and holding limits
Safeguarding regime design
Key Dates
November 10, 2025- Bank of England published consultation paper on proposed regulatory regime
February 2026- Consultation deadline (industry to submit comments)DEADLINE
2026- Expected implementation of UK stablecoin regime (timeline subject to consultation outcomes)
Further consultation expected- On detailed design of safeguarding regime and central bank liquidity arrangements
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bankโs administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
This Market Notice confirms that the previously announced increase to the minimum spread over Bank Rate on bids against Level A collateral in the Indexed Long-Term Repo (ILTR) operation will take effect from 17 November 2025.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Update of Circular CSSF 22/821 on the Long Form Report, as amended by Circulars CSSF 23/845 and CSSF 24/865
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/897 updates Circular CSSF 22/821 on the Long Form Report (LFR) for credit institutions, further aligning the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) with current supervisory priorities such as ML/FT risks and organizational aspects. This matters because it refines reporting to reduce redundancies, enhance transparency in REA assessments, and reflect evolving prudential focuses since prior amendments via Circulars CSSF 23/845 and 24/865, ensuring institutions' reports better support CSSF oversight.
#
What Changed
Introduces new modules in the revised SAQ to align with supervisory points of focus, building on prior expansions (e.g., credit/counterparty risk, liquidity risk, climate-related risks from CSSF 23/845).
Emphasizes REA's independent assessment in the AML/CFT report, requiring exhaustive, transparent evaluations of ML/FT risks across institutions, branches, majority-owned subsidiaries abroad, and tied agents; prohibits vague language (e.g., no "no serious weaknesses" phrasing) and mandates positi
What You Need To Do
Complete and submit revised SAQ annually, incorporating new modules on supervisory focuses like ML/FT risks and providing detailed data to REA
Authorized management
Ensure AML/CFT report details methodologies (e
Review prior LFR submissions against this update to align with suppressed redundancies and new emphases
Key Dates
31 October 2025- Issuance date of Circular CSSF 25/897.
Three months after financial year-end- Annual submission deadline for SAQ to CSSF (unchanged from prior circulars).DEADLINE
Five months after financial year-end- Submission deadline for REA Reports (Financial Instruments and Funds Report; AML/CFT Report).DEADLINE
Six months after financial year-end- Aligned submission for REA management letter (per amendments in CSSF 23/845 to Circular 22/826).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Institutions face immediate refinement needs for 2025 year-end reporting (e.g., SAQ due ~Q1 2026), with stricter REA scrutiny on AML/CFT transparency risking supervisory findings or enforcement if vague assessments persist; aligns with ongoing CSSF push for risk-focused oversight ami
Long Form ReportPractical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by institutionsMission and related reports of the statutory auditors (rรฉviseurs dโentreprises agrรฉรฉs)
AI Analysis
**Circular CSSF 22/821** (as amended) fundamentally restructures how Luxembourg credit institutions report to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) by replacing the traditional Long Form Report with a digital **self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ)**, complemented by auditor-prepared reports. This shift represents a significant operational change that requires institutions to directly participate in prudential self-assessment while maintaining robust external audit oversight, making it essential for compliance and operational teams to understand new submission requirements and digital workflows.
What Changed
The circular introduces a three-component reporting framework that fundamentally alters the compliance landscape:
Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ): A digital, annually-completed questionnaire that institutions must prepare directly, covering domains within CSSF and ECB prudential supervision competence
Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) Reports: Reports prepared by approved statutory auditors (rรฉviseurs d'entreprises agrรฉรฉs) on specific compliance areas
Separate REA Report on Financial Instruments
What You Need To Do
*For Credit Institutions
*Establish SAQ Governance
*Data Preparation
*Digital System Access
*Module Completion
Key Dates
25 October 2022- Circular CSSF 22/821 issued
31 December 2022- Circular enters into application
Three months before financial year closure- SAQ becomes accessible through CSSF digital solution
Three months after financial year closure- Deadline for SAQ submission to CSSFDEADLINE
Five months after financial year closure- Deadline for REA reports submissionDEADLINE
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes today the Prudential Regulation Authorityโs (PRAโs) policy statement 20/25 โ The Strong and Simple Framework: The simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) โ near-final.
AI Analysis
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes the Prudential Regulation Authority's (PRA) Policy Statement (PS) 20/25, which finalizes the second phase of the "Strong and Simple Framework" by introducing a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), alongside liquidity simplifications. This matters because it reduces regulatory burdens, enhances competition among smaller UK banks and building societies, and maintains resilience without full Basel 3.1 standards, with implementation on 1 January 2027.
#
What Changed
Pillar 1 simplifications: Adoption of Basel 3.1 standardised approaches to credit and operational risk; disapplication of due diligence for credit risk, simplifications to market risk, removal of counterparty credit risk and CVA requirements for derivatives (with exceptions), and adjustments to Leverage Ratio and Large Exposures.
Pillar 2A methodologies: Simplifications for credit risk, credit concentration risk (CCoR), and operational risk; amendments to single-name concentration monitoring (cl
What You Need To Do
Assess SDDT eligibility
Update capital frameworks
ICR transitions
Policy and process revisions
Supervisory engagement
Key Dates
17 January 2025Deadline for comments on related CP14/24.DEADLINE
28 October 2025Publication of near-final PS20/25.
1 January 2026Full Basel 3.1 standards apply to ICR opt-in firms (ICR revoked); some changes to SoP2/23, ICAAP/ILAAP update frequencies effective from PS4/26 publication.
20 January 2026Publication of final PS4/26 confirming PS20/25; effective date for ICAAP/ILAAP updates (including reverse stress-testing).
1 January 2027Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes full effect.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ With full implementation on 1 January 2027 (less than 12 months from today), SDDTs face tight timelines for capital recalibrations, ICR exits, and reporting overhauls; missing deadlines risks supervisory intervention or full Basel 3.1 compliance costs. This significantly eases burden
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
What Changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
*Securitisation Requirements**
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expect
What You Need To Do
*Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
*Assess securitisation impacts
*Evaluate mortgage capital treatment
*Update ECAI mapping processes
*Establish implementation timeline
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026- PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026- Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027- Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
PS18/25, published by the PRA on 28 October 2025, retires the "refined methodology" for Pillar 2A capital calculations, replacing it with reliance on the Basel 3.1 Credit Risk Standardised Approach (CR SA) for greater risk sensitivity, transparency, and proportionality. This near-final policy simplifies the Pillar 2A framework, reduces administrative burdens, and aligns with broader Basel 3.1 implementation and the Strong and Simple regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), promoting safety, soundness, and competition. It matters because it directly impacts credit risk capital add-ons for affected firms, requiring updates to ICAAP/SREP processes ahead of Basel 3.1 timelines.
#
What Changed
Retirement of Refined Methodology: Eliminates supervisory adjustments to Pillar 2A credit risk add-ons based on IRB benchmarking, as Basel 3.1 CR SA better captures risks and reduces gaps between standardised and IRB approaches.
Policy Material Updates:
- Near-final amendments to Statement of Policy (SoP) 5/15 โ The PRAโs methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital.
- Final amendments to Supervisory Statement (SS) 31/15 โ The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and Supervisor
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal Pillar 2A methodologies, ICAAP/SREP documentation to remove refined methodology reliance and align with Basel 3
Model/calculate potential capital impacts from CR SA changes vs
Prepare for IRRBB/pension risk clarifications in SS31/15 submissions from 1 July 2026; monitor CP12/25 review
Engage PRA supervisors on firm-specific transitions; update reporting (e
Firms may apply changes early in ICAAP from relevant dates (e
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PS18/25 publication with near-final policy and PRA feedback to CP9/24/CP7/24 consultations.
1 July 2026- Effective date for pension obligation risk amendments in SoP5/15 and SS31/15 clarifications (IRRBB changes partially deferred).
Q2 2026- Expected finalisation of CP12/25 Phase 1 proposals (Pillar 2A review, including IRB benchmarking removal).
Basel 3.1 Implementation Date (TBD, aligned with CR SA go-live)- Retirement of refined methodology and related credit/operational risk changes.
January 2026- PS2/26 published as final policy, minor adjustment to SS31/15 para 5.12A.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Firms must act now to recalibrate Pillar 2A capital ahead of Basel 3.1 and 1 July 2026 effective dates, as retirement eliminates adjustments that reduced add-ons for low-risk CR SA firms, potentially increasing capital requirements despite Basel 3.1 offsets. Non-compliance risks supe
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
What Changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
*ICAAP Requirements**
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligation risk, and foreign currency lending to unhedged retail and SME borrowers
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of c
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Actions
*Establish ICAAP Framework
*Risk Identification and Assessment
*Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
Key Dates
29 July 2015- SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026- Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing- Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rulesDEADLINE
**PS20/25** represents the second and final phase of the PRA's "Strong and Simple Framework," establishing a significantly simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) while maintaining their resilience. This near-final policy statement, published on 28 October 2025, fundamentally restructures capital requirements, liquidity rules, and operational frameworks for SDDTsโa critical development for smaller deposit-taking institutions seeking regulatory relief from disproportionate compliance burdens.
What Changed
The simplified capital regime introduces structural changes across all three pillars of capital requirements:
*Pillar 1 (Risk-Weighted Assets)
SDDTs must apply Basel 3.1 standardised approaches for credit risk and operational risk, with specific simplifications.
Due diligence requirements in the standardised approach to credit risk are disapplied for SDDTs.
Counterparty credit risk (CCR) for derivatives and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk are disapplied (with minor exceptions).
Market ri
What You Need To Do
*For SDDTs Currently Operating or Considering Entry:
*Notification Decision โ Determine whether to enter the SDDT regime and submit notification to the PRA by 31 March 2026 if seeking to benefit from simplified rules
*Policy Review โ Conduct comprehensive review of PS20/25, related policy statements (PS18/25, PS19/25, PS8/25, PS14/25), and supporting methodologies (SoP5/25, SS4/25, amendments to SoP2/23)
*Capital Calculation Transition โ Prepare systems and processes to transition from current capital calculation methodologies to Basel 3
Removal of CCR and CVA calculations for derivatives
Key Dates
31 March 2026โ Deadline for firms wishing to enter the SDDT regime to notify the PRA and benefit from the simplified framework at implementation.DEADLINE
1 January 2027โ Implementation date for the simplified capital regime for SDDTs; the Interim Capital Regime will no longer apply.
2026 (specific date TBD)โ PRA to make final rules and policy covering the entire Basel 3.1 package once HM Treasury makes commencement regulations to revoke relevant CRR provisions.
2027 (specific date TBD)โ PRA to implement restatement of CRR requirements (PS19/25).
Crypto-assets Investment services Financial services providers The Financial Stability Board and the International Organisation of Securities Commissions publish two reports assessing the implementation of recommendations on crypto-asset and stablecoin activities
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
What Changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
*Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission** from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
*Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits** calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the tim
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
*Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The PRA has published LIAC02/25, a consultation on proposed low impact amendments to rules and policy.
AI Analysis
The PRA's LIAC02/25 consultation, published on 16 October 2025, proposes low-impact amendments to its Rulebook and policy materials, including technical fixes, conditional disapplications, and miscellaneous corrections to enhance accuracy and align with prior policies. These changes matter for PRA-regulated firms as they ensure regulatory consistency with minimal operational burden, with most taking effect in late 2025 or early 2026 following the consultation period.
#
What Changed
The main proposals include:
Conditional disapplication of PRA General Provisions to implement deference arrangements under the UK-Swiss Berne Financial Services Agreement.
Amendment to Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions (TMTP) Part, Rule 5.2, introducing a new formula for 'Wr' effective 31 December 2025, using existing 'Wq' values without retrospective recalculation.
Amendment to Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (ISPV) Part, Solvency Requirements Rule 2.2A(3), clarifying the 'no co-mi
What You Need To Do
Submit consultation responses by 13 November 2025 via the PRA's Low Impact Amendments Process page, focusing on proposed disapplications, TMTP formula, ISPV rules, and miscellaneous changes
Review and update internal policies for TMTP calculations to adopt the new 'Wr' formula from 31 December 2025 year-end, without restating priors
Confirm compliance with ISPV 'no co-mingling' clarifications and SS2/25 updates by 23 December 2025
Verify Rulebook references (e
For friendly societies/credit unions
Key Dates
13 November 2025Consultation closes for LIAC02/25 responses.
21 October 2025Effectiveness of Solvency II restatement amendments (from prior consultations).
23 December 2025Effectiveness of ISPV Rule 2.2A(3), TMTP Rule 5.2A(3), minimum fees reduction, and related SS2/25 updates; also LIAF03/25 amendments per industry reports.
19 January 2026Effectiveness of Securitisation Part Rule 2, Article 7 amendment aligning with FSMA revocations.
24 July 2025Effectiveness of certain non-substantive Solvency II fixes (already passed).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low โ These are explicitly "low impact" technical, typographical, and alignment amendments with no material capital, reporting, or operational shifts expected; many stem from prior consultations (e.g., CP8/25, CP12/23, PS10/25) and avoid retrospective changes. Firms should act promptly on r
The PRA and FCA have today confirmed plans to increase flexibility around senior banker pay, alongside changes to create better links between bonus awards and responsible risk-taking.
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
#
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from ยฃ44,000 variable pay to ยฃ660,000 total pay (with variable pay โค33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferra
What You Need To Do
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
Embed SMR-linked adjustments
For dual-regulated firms
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accoun
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA takes note of the Federal Administrative Courtโs partial decision concerning the write-down of AT1 capital instruments. FINMA will contest the judgment of 1 October 2025 and appeal to the Federal Supreme Court.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA today published guidance on the extension of the transitional period for exchange of collateral in certain OTC derivatives transactions. The current transitional period runs until 1 January 2026 and will be extended by a further three years.
AI Analysis
FINMA extended the transitional period for collateral exchange requirements in non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2029, providing Swiss market participants with three additional years of relief from mandatory collateral posting obligations on certain equity derivatives. This extension aligns Swiss regulation with the EU's indefinite exemption introduced in December 2024, preventing competitive disadvantages for Swiss derivatives traders while a permanent regulatory framework is developed.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change is the extension of the transitional period under Article 131 paragraph 5bis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance (FinMIO). Specifically:
Previous deadline: January 1, 2026
New deadline: January 1, 2029
Scope: Applies to non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions involving equity options, index options, and equity basket derivatives that are not cleared through a FINMA-authorized or recognized central counterparty
Regulatory basis: FINMA Guidanc
What You Need To Do
*Acknowledge the extended timeline
*Maintain risk management controls
*Monitor FinMIA revision
*Document compliance rationale
*Assess competitive positioning
Key Dates
October 9, 2025- FINMA Guidance 04/2025 published and takes effect immediately
January 1, 2029- New expiration date for the transitional period; collateral exchange obligations become mandatory unless further extended or a permanent framework is adopted
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement.
Survey on the amount of covered deposits held on 30 September 2025
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/47 mandates a regular survey by Luxembourg credit institutions on the amount of covered deposits as of **30 September 2025**, focusing on eligible and covered deposits under the Law of 18 December 2015 on deposit guarantee schemes. It matters because it ensures accurate reporting to the Conseil de protection des dรฉposants et des investisseurs (CPDI) for FGDL (Fonds de garantie des dรฉpรดts Luxembourg) compliance, with detailed field-by-field instructions for complex accounts like omnibus and trusts.
#
What Changed
This circular updates prior guidance (notably CSSF-CPDI 16/02 as amended by CSSF-CPDI 23/35) by specifying the survey reference date of 30 September 2025 and providing granular reporting fields for eligible deposits (e.g., exclusions for financial institution-like structures and life insurance products), covered deposits capped at โฌ100,000 per person, and breakdowns by natural/legal persons, including shares in omnibus accounts, fiduciaries, trusts, sub-accounts, and segregated accounts. Key fie
What You Need To Do
For omnibus/trust accounts, obtain and report shares of identifiable entitled persons, apportion by legal status of holder, and ensure fields like 0226 and 0255 reconcile
Designated management reviews/approves data; transmit accurately to CSSF/CPDI, respecting prior circulars (e
Exclude non-creditor accounts or those assimilated to financial institutions/life insurance
Key Dates
30 September 2025- Reference date for snapshot of deposits, eligible deposits, and covered deposits.
6 October 2025- Publication date of the circular by CSSF.
31 December 2025) imply prompt post-reference date filing to CSSF/CPDI; firms should confirm via full PDF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ Past reference date (30 September 2025) as of January 2026 means non-reporting firms risk immediate FGDL non-compliance, fines, or supervisory action from CSSF, but this is a routine quarterly survey (see related Circular CSSF-CPDI 25/49 for December 2025). Matters for prudential r
Stress-testing Markets Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The Banque de France, the ACPR and the AMF launch a first system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today enhanced its efforts to assist broker-dealers and other market participants on the path to central clearing of U.S. Treasury securities, developing a one-stop webpage that puts the latest status updates, staffโฆ
PS15/25 introduces **new liquidity risk reporting requirements for major UK insurance firms**, closing data gaps identified during the March 2020 "dash for cash" and September 2022 LDI crisis. The policy mandates four new reporting templates for firms with significant derivatives or securities lending exposure, with implementation deferred to **30 September 2026** to allow adequate preparation time.
What Changed
The PRA's final policy establishes the following regulatory framework:
*New Reporting Templates**
Four new liquidity reporting templates have been introduced to capture previously unavailable data:
Annual committed facilities template
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template (short form)
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template for ring-fenced funds, matching adjustment portfolios, and remaining parts
Additional supervisory reporting requirements
*Scope and Thresholds
Firms are subject to liquidity repo
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (by Q2 2026)
*Threshold Assessment
*RFF Mapping
*System Readiness
*Data Governance
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA published PS15/25 (policy statement)
31 December 2025- Original implementation deadline (now superseded)DEADLINE
30 September 2026- **Final implementation date for all liquidity reporting requirements**
First reporting reference date after 30 September 2026- Firms meeting threshold conditions must commence reportingDEADLINE
Three consecutive annual reporting reference dates- Threshold for ceasing reporting once firms fall below thresholds
SS15/16 establishes the PRA's expectations for UK insurance firms using approved internal models to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR), requiring them to maintain the ability to calculate SCR using the standard formula and submit standard formula SCR calculations for regulatory monitoring purposes. This guidance is critical because it ensures capital requirements remain reflective of actual firm risks and protects policyholder security by preventing model driftโwhere internal models diverge from underlying risk realities over time.
What Changed
The supervisory statement introduces several core regulatory expectations:
Internal Model Maintenance Requirement: Firms with approved internal models must maintain the capability to calculate SCR using the standard formula, even if they primarily use internal models for capital calculations.
Standard Formula SCR Reporting: Firms using approved internal models to calculate solo SCR are expected to report standard formula SCR results privately to the PRA on an annual basis.
Model Drift Monitor
What You Need To Do
*Maintain Dual Calculation Capability
*Establish Annual Reporting Process
*Integrate into Risk Management
*Obtain Senior Management Approval
*Maintain Supporting Documentation
Key Dates
25 October 2016- Original SS15/16 publication
31 December 2018- Document updated (referenced in original guidance)
September 2025- Most recent update to SS15/16 published, clarifying expectations for firms with material non-life technical provisions
Four weeks after annual quantitative reporting submission- Deadline for standard formula SCR reportingDEADLINE
30 September 2026- Implementation deadline for liquidity reporting rules (related Solvency II development)DEADLINE
Letter to chief financial officers of selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers which provides thematic feedback from the PRAโs review of written auditor reports received in 2025 covering IFRS 9 expected credit loss accounting (ECL) and accounting for climate risk.
AI Analysis
The PRA's Dear CFO Letter, issued on 30 September 2025 by David Bailey, provides thematic feedback to selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers based on its 2025 review of auditor reports on IFRS 9 expected credit loss (ECL) accounting and climate risk integration. It matters because it highlights persistent supervisory concerns around timely credit risk recognition, model limitations, recovery assumptions, and climate impacts amid economic uncertainty, urging firms to strengthen ECL processes to ensure safety and soundness.
#
What Changed
This is not a formal rule change or new regulation but thematic feedback building on prior years, with "areas of focus" for improvement:
Model risk: Elevated due to macroeconomic/geopolitical uncertainty; firms must enhance post-model adjustments (PMAs) for completeness (e.g., affordability risks, sector vulnerabilities), granular monitoring of borrower cohorts/ECL components, and model redevelopment governance.
Recovery strategies: Ongoing risk of historical bias in Loss Given Default (LGD) est
What You Need To Do
Conduct self-assessments against annex "areas of focus" (model risk, recovery, climate) and share with auditors ahead of 2026 reporting
Enhance PMAs
Model improvements
Recovery processes
Climate integration
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA issues Dear CFO Letter with thematic feedback.
2025- Auditor reports reviewed by PRA (basis for this feedback).
2026- Next round of written auditor reporting on firms' progress against areas of focus, including data aggregation and securitisation impacts; firms encouraged to self-assess now.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Persistent issues from prior years (e.g., 2024 feedback) indicate elevated model risk in uncertain conditions could lead to PRA scrutiny, auditor findings, or enforcement if unaddressed; 2026 auditor reports will benchmark progress, risking heightened supervision. Matters for prudent
Single Resolution Fund โ Information request by the Single Resolution Board for the calculation of the 2026 contribution according to Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF-CODERES 25/21, issued by the CSSF on 29 September 2025, mandates Luxembourg credit institutions to submit specific data via XBRL-formatted Data Reporting Forms (DRFs) to enable the Single Resolution Board (SRB) to calculate 2026 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRF) under Articles 4 and 14 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63. This matters because non-compliance risks SRB using estimates, applying the highest risk multiplier, or penalties, ensuring the financial sector funds resolution costs without taxpayer burden.
#
What Changed
Introduces data collection for 2026 SRF contributions, conditional on SRB verifying SRF funds fall below 1% of covered deposits in the Banking Union by early 2026.
Mandates XBRL submission of DRFs (except restatements up to 2022 in Excel); provides templates in Annexes 3a, 4, 5 (User Guide), and 7a/7b for additional assurances.
Additional assurance requirements (e.g., auditor reports or Agreed-Upon Procedures - AUP) apply conditionally to ECB-supervised institutions unless under lump-sum payment
What You Need To Do
Download and complete DRF using Annexes (e
For ECB-supervised institutions
Align internal systems with CSSF templates early; validate data to avoid SRB assumptions under Article 17(1) DR
30 November 2025- SRB decision deadline on whether to calculate/collect 2026 SRF contributions based on DRFs (triggers full additional assurance application).DEADLINE
15 January 2026- ECB-supervised institutions submit AUP or auditor reports on restatements to CSSF resolution department.
16 January 2026, 24:00 CET- All institutions submit completed DRF in XBRL to CSSF; late/incomplete submissions lead to SRB estimates or highest risk multiplier.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - The 16 January 2026 deadline is imminent (today is 25 January 2026), risking immediate SRB penalties like estimates or maximum risk multipliers if submissions are missed/inaccurate; affects capital planning as contributions directly impact prudential positions.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA has identified further progress in UBSโs resolvability and continues to view a resolution as feasible. However, there is a need for greater optionality, which will also require legislative changes. UBSโs emergency plan largely fulfils the current statutory requirements. However, it needs to be better integrated in the resolution plan in the future and thus cannot currently be regarded as executable. As in 2024, FINMAโs review of the recov...
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA and the UK Financial Conduct Authority FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority PRA today signed a memorandum of understanding. The memorandum sets out details of the co-operation under the Berne Financial Services Agreement and opens up new cross-border opportunities in insurance and investment services.
The PRA's CP21/25 proposes deletion of 37 banking regulatory reporting templatesโprimarily 34 FINREP templates representing approximately one-third of all FINREP collectionsโas the first phase of its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme. This initiative aims to reduce annual reporting burden by approximately ยฃ26 million while maintaining supervisory effectiveness by eliminating duplicative, outdated, or low-value data collections.
What Changed
The PRA proposes the following regulatory deletions:
*FINREP Template Deletions:**
Permanent deletion of 34 whole FINREP reporting templates (approximately one-third of all FINREP collections)
Consolidation of remaining FINREP requirements within a single section of the PRA Rulebook
Clarification of scoping conditions where current provisions are unclear, duplicative, or inconsistently applied
Alignment of reporting remittance dates for FINREP reporting
*Other Template Deletions:**
Two COREP t
What You Need To Do
*Cease reporting on the 37 deleted templates effective 31 December 2025
*Update internal systems and processes to remove validation rules and submission workflows for deleted templates
*Revise compliance calendars to reflect aligned FINREP reporting remittance dates
*Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations to identify any continued requirements based on deleted FINREP templates and assess whether disclosure obligations remain despite template deletion
*Implement rulebook changes reflecting consolidation of FINREP scoping provisions into the PRA Rulebook
Key Dates
September 2025- CP21/25 consultation paper published
31 December 2025- Proposed implementation date to avoid firms submitting 2025 Q4 data for deleted templates
8 December 2025- PS27/25 (Policy Statement) published, confirming final policy
CP20/25 is a PRA consultation paper published on 16 September 2025 that proposes targeted updates to the regulatory framework governing third-country insurance branches operating in the UK. The consultation addresses inconsistencies introduced during the Solvency II review, clarifies supervisory expectations, and increases the subsidiarisation thresholdโmatters that directly affect the operational and compliance costs of non-UK insurers seeking to maintain branch operations rather than establish subsidiaries in the UK market.
What Changed
The consultation proposes four primary regulatory modifications:
*Subsidiarisation Threshold Increase
The PRA proposes raising the FSCS liability threshold above which third-country branches must establish a UK subsidiary from ยฃ500 million to ยฃ600 million**. The PRA attributes this increase to inflation rather than organic growth, aiming to prevent branches from artificially approaching the current threshold and incurring unnecessary subsidiarisation costs.
*ORSA Reporting Clarification
Curren
What You Need To Do
*Threshold Assessment
*Reporting Requirement Review
*Quantitative Metrics Compliance
*Three-Year Notification Obligation
*Asset Holding Verification
Key Dates
16 September 2025- CP20/25 published by the PRA
16 December 2025- Consultation response deadlineDEADLINE
H1 2026- Statement of Policy (SoP) expected to be published; subsidiarisation threshold update anticipated upon SoP publication
31 December 2026- Planned implementation date for rulebook changes
MiCA Other professionals Fintech Journalists Listed companies and issuers The French, Austrian and Italian markets authorities call for a stronger European framework for crypto-asset markets
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is today publishing guidance on the disclosure of cryptobased assets in the annual financial statements of banks and securities firms. It is thereby addressing ambiguities that have arisen since the DLT Act entered into force. FINMA emphasises that the existing duties of disclosure must continue to be complied with and provides clarifications.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is transferring the FINMA Banking Insolvency Ordinance, FINMA Insurance Bankruptcy Ordinance and FINMA Collective Investment Schemes Bankruptcy Ordinance to a new consolidated FINMA Insolvency Ordinance. The existing regulations have been revised and adapted where necessary โ based on findings from practical experience and academia. In addition, the FINMA Insolvency Ordinance implements the amendments made necessary by the revisions to th...
The 2024 insurance market report, which was published today by FINMA, offers an overview of the Swiss insurance market last year. Swiss insurance companies achieved aggregate annual profits of CHF 10.4 billion in 2024, which represents a 24% decrease over the previous year. While life and non-life insurers were able to increase their profits, reinsurers recorded a significant decline.
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA has completed its annual assessment of the emergency and recovery plans for the domestic systemically important banks. The emergency plans for Zรผrcher Kantonalbank and Raiffeisen fulfil the regulatory requirements. The emergency plan for PostFinance is still not ready to implement. The recovery plans for all institutions were approved.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
On 3 July 2025, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA launched the consultations on the new Ordinances on the Risk Diversification of Banks and Securities Firms and on the Liquidity of Banks and Securities Firms. The consultations will go on until 29 September 2025.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Asset management MMF The AMF applies ESMA's guidelines on updating stress scenario parameters, in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation
Cooperation Europe & international The AMF applies the joint guidelines issued by the European Supervisory Authorities to facilitate the exchange of information between National Competent Authorities
Anti-money Laundering Asset management Crypto-assets Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority on restrictive measures for crypto-asset service providers
Europe & international Cooperation Financial stability, artificial intelligence, data quality and financial education at the heart of the discussions at the AMF 2025 international seminar for securities regulators
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2024 accounts: The AMF publishes recommendations and the results of its examinations of financial statements
Cooperation Markets Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the AMMC are strengthening their...
Regulatory developments Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures Cooperation Journalists AMF and Banque de France call for a well-anticipated move to T+1 Settlement Cycle
Asset management MMF AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on updating the stress scenario parameters provided for in Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation for 2024
Asset management Europe & international Journalists Investment management companies Austrian, French, Italian and Spanish financial market authorities give their key priorities for a macro-prudential approach to asset management
Anti-money Laundering Asset management Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF examines the systems for valuation of the less liquid assets of UCITS and AIFs
Regulatory developments Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures Central counterpartiesโ recovery plan: AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on recovery plan indicators and scenarios
Asset management The Autoritรฉ des Marchรฉs Financiers (AMF) has withdrawn the authorisation of the portfolio asset management company Quantology Capital Management
MMF Asset management Regulatory developments The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation for 2023
Asset management Anti-money Laundering Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority
Supervision UCIT Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF calls on investment fund depositaries to strengthen their arrangements for the onboarding and monitoring of asset management companies
Supervision Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on simple, transparent and standardised securitisation
MMF Asset management The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation
Market infrastructures Post-trading infrastructures EMIR Common procedures and methodologies on supervisory review and evaluation process of CCPs under Article 21 of EMIR: the AMF complies with ESMA guidelines
Marketing Investing wisely Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF are urging professionals to improve their practices in online marketing of savings products and financial instruments
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Covid-19 Closing of the 2021 financial statements: the AMF publishes its recommendations and the results of its recent work examining financial statements
Asset management Prospectus Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF proposes measures to promote a wider adoption of liquidity management tools by fund managers
Asset management MMF The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation