ESMA publishes report on cross-border marketing of funds including statistics on notifications 06 January 2026 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its third report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under the Regulation on cross-border distribution of funds . For the first time, the report includes statistics on notifications of cross-border marketing of funds. Drawing on input from ...
In his latest blog, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf argues that economists must adapt their analytical frameworks and expand their focus beyond traditional topics to address emerging challenges—such as geopolitical upheaval and defence spending—in order to provide robust evidence-based policy advice that serves the public interest.
FCA stunt launches new Firm Checker tool as around 700,000 people lose money to investment scams. Morning commuters at London Waterloo got more than their usual caffeine hit today when a mysterious 'ATM' promising to 'give away a fortune' stopped them in their tracks – and revealed an unexpected surprise.As curious passers-by approached the machine, the screen slid open to unveil Emil the Seal, the FCA's finance-friendly mascot, delivering a blunt message about the dangers of investment scams...
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti (SR 946.231.139.4) publiziert.
Central Bank of Ireland has successfully completed the sale of its Spencer Dock (East Wing) building to the Office of Public Works for €23.7m. The sale of Spencer Dock was a key element of the Central Bank’s longer term property strategy aligned to our decision to develop a single Dockland Campus through the purchase of our North Wall Quay building and subsequent purchase of our Mayor Street building. This sale of the East Wing, to Office of Public Works on 22 January 2026, follows the earlie...
We have signed a contract with Etrading Software (ETS) to deliver the UK bond consolidated tape. A high-quality tape will provide investors with a comprehensive overview of the bond market and support price formation and liquidity. It will help maintain the UK’s position as a highly competitive and compelling place to invest and grow.ETS has now launched a website that sets out key milestones and provides technical information for data contributors and users. We will continue to support ETS a...
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung über Massnahmen betreffend Guatemala (SR 946.231.137.6) publiziert.
The FCA has launched a review into the implications of advanced AI on consumers, retail financial markets and regulators. The Review will be led by Sheldon Mills and builds on the FCA’s existing work on AI. This includes its AI Discussion Paper, AI Sprint, and AI Lab including AI Live Testing and its groundbreaking Supercharged Sandbox supported by NVIDIA.AI is already embedded across financial services. Rapid advances in generative, agentic and emerging forms of AI mean the next phase of cha...
Sanctions & settlements MAR Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an investment services provider and its director a total of €850,000
FINRA's Information Notice dated October 21, 2025, reminds member firms of NSCC's amendment to Rule 50, effective October 17, 2025, which removes the "Settle Prep Day" from the ACATS process, shortening full customer account transfers to 3-4 business days. This matters because it aligns with FINRA Rule 11870's requirements to expedite transfers, enhances operational efficiency, reduces risk, and improves client experience amid broader industry shifts like T+1 settlement.[original notice]
#
What Changed
Removal of Settle Prep Day: NSCC Rule 50 amended to eliminate the settlement preparation stage from ACATS, effective October 17, 2025, streamlining the process for all securities transfers.[original notice]
Mutual Fund/Options Synchronization: Eliminates the extra day for processing mutual funds and options via Fund/SERV, aligning their settlement with other assets; also removes the second day of Fund/SERV pending acknowledgment.[original notice]
Overall Timeline Reduction: Full ACATS transfers
September 10, 2025- Federal Register publication of SEC approval (90 FR 43709).[original notice]
October 17, 2025- Effective date: Removal of Settle Prep Day and Fund/SERV changes; firms must support next-day settling assets.[original notice]DEADLINE
October 2026- Planned modernization of ACATS client interfaces (decommission of legacy formats; migration to JSON/MQ for enhanced messaging).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Effective over three months ago (as of January 2026), with industry-wide accommodation confirmed; no new mandates but requires ongoing operational alignment to avoid Rule 11870 violations (e.g., delays in validation or exceptions). Matters for reducing transfer failures, enhancing
The FCA's updated Statement of Policy outlines its approach to statutory investigations into possible regulatory failures under Part 5 of the Financial Services Act 2012, including criteria for triggering investigations and producing reports for HM Treasury. It matters because it clarifies when the FCA must self-scrutinize serious lapses in regulation, helping firms anticipate rare but high-profile probes into systemic issues affecting consumer protection, market integrity, or competition. The primary update adjusts inflation-linked monetary thresholds for assessing "significant" consumer detriment, ensuring the policy remains relevant.
#
What Changed
Inflation-adjusted monetary thresholds for consumer detriment: Detriment exceeding £210 million is more likely deemed "significant," while below £45 million is unlikely to meet the threshold unless qualitative factors (e.g., consumer vulnerability, widespread impact) apply. These replace 2013 levels and will be reviewed periodically.
No other substantive changes from the 2013 policy; refinements emphasize internal "lessons learned" reviews for non-statutory cases to avoid resource duplication in
What You Need To Do
Monitor for triggering events
Enhance internal reviews
No direct firm obligations
Document qualitative factors (e
Key Dates
14 November 2025- Publication date of updated Statement of Policy.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This update signals FCA's commitment to accountability without imposing new firm-level rules, but it heightens focus on significant failures (£45m+ detriment), potentially leading to public reports exposing industry-wide gaps. Firms with high consumer exposure (e.g., retail-facing)
The FCA's PS25/22 establishes a new regulatory framework for **targeted support**—a form of financial guidance that allows authorised firms to provide ready-made suggestions to consumer segments without conducting individualised suitability assessments. This framework addresses the UK's "advice gap" by enabling firms to deliver affordable, scalable financial support to an estimated 18 million consumers within a decade, fundamentally shifting how retail investors and pension savers access guidance on investment and retirement decisions.
What Changed
The framework introduces several material regulatory changes:
*New Specified Activity Status**
Targeted support will be designated as a new specified activity under the Regulated Activities Order, meaning only FCA-authorised firms can provide this service. This creates a regulatory boundary distinct from both unregulated guidance and regulated investment advice.
*Purpose Statement Refinement**
The FCA amended its original purpose statement from "better outcomes" to "better position" to clarify
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (January–February 2026)
*Pre-Implementation (March 2026)
Consumer segment definitions with supporting rationale
Ready-made suggestion frameworks
Communication templates explaining the nature of targeted support
Key Dates
29/08/2025- Consultation period closed (CP25/17 and CP25/26)
11/12/2025- Policy Statement PS25/22 published with near-final rules
March 2026- Firms may begin applying for targeted support permission
06/04/2026- New rules expected to come into force (subject to Government legislation making targeted support a specified activity)
The FCA's PS25/23 finalizes guidance on tackling **non-financial misconduct (NFM)** in financial services, amending the COCON sourcebook to clarify how serious NFM breaches conduct rules and integrating it into FIT assessments for fitness and propriety. This matters because it aligns rules across banks and non-banks, enhances accountability, deters harmful workplace cultures, and supports FCA objectives like consumer protection and market integrity by ensuring consistent handling of issues like bullying or harassment.
#
What Changed
COCON amendments: Expands scope to non-banks for work-related serious NFM involving financial services personnel; provides flowcharts, examples, and factors (e.g., seriousness, pattern, dishonesty, violence) to assess breaches consistently; clarifies only "serious" NFM qualifies, aligned with Equality Act concepts, and excludes trivial/private matters.
FIT sourcebook updates: Integrates NFM into fit and proper tests for employees/senior personnel; firms assess case-by-case without investigating
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies/handbooks to incorporate COCON/FIT guidance on NFM assessment, including flowcharts and factors for breaches/fitness
Train HR, compliance, and managers on applying rules consistently, emphasizing seriousness thresholds, case-by-case judgement, and alignment with employment law/privacy
Enhance regulatory reference processes to disclose past NFM; ensure reporting of serious breaches to FCA
Assess current NFM handling for gaps (e
Firms not to investigate trivial/improbable allegations or overstep privacy laws
Key Dates
2023Consultation on D&I in financial sector opened
2023Consultation on D&I in financial sector closed
2025Policy Statement and Consultation on non-financial misconduct guidance (CP25/18) published
2025Consultation on non-financial misconduct guidance closed
2025Policy Statement on non-financial misconduct (PS25/23) published
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With rules effective 1 September 2026 (9+ months from today), firms have preparation time, but PS25/23 closes FCA's NFM policy work, shifting to supervision/enforcement focus; non-compliance risks enforcement, FIT failures, and reputational damage amid trust-building priorities in FC
ASIC takes action against MWL Financial Services, former director Nicholas Maikousis, and Imperial Capital Group Australia over alleged Shield advice failures
We urge consumers thinking of investing in high-risk securities, such as mini-bonds and loan notes, to continue to be cautious. On 19 January 2026, the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading regime came into force. The regime sets new rules and standards about when an offer of securities to the public can be made.A security is a financial instrument that represents some type of financial value (for example, shares, bonds and stock) that can be traded on a financial exchange.The types of secu...
Speech by Sheree Howard at the FCA's Gateway to growth, Chicago Booth London Conference Centre. The first time I flew was in my teenage years, and like many of my generation, that was a flight to Europe for a family holiday. I didn’t make it further afield until I was in my mid to late twenties.Today, most, if not all of us, would think of international travel as the norm – especially given the global nature of our business.It is amazing, therefore, to think that right around this time in 197...
The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates for appointment as members of the SEC’s Investor Advisory Committee, established pursuant to Section 39 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to help protect investors and improve securities…
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered in WhatsApp groups operated by Leading Asset Management, Denver, USA. BaFin suspects the operators of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services in these groups without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered by Aureus Trade. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website aureus-trade(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website bxforex(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, this website is being used to offer financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Rostock24 Limited and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website rostock24(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation. Rostock24 Limited, which purportedly has its head office in Nuremberg, claims to be registered with the British Companies House. This is not the case.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against fixed-term deposit offers sent from the email address info[at]vcgmanagement.de. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown providers are conducting banking transactions without the required authorisation. The offers do not originate from VC Germany Management GmbH. This is a case of identity theft.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is seeking candidates to fill a limited number of vacancies on the agency’s Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee, which provides advice and recommendations to the Commission on rules, regulations, and…
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website bb-consults(.)com. BaFin has information that this website is being used to offer financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Keith E. Cassidy has been appointed Director of the Division of Examinations. Mr. Cassidy has served as Acting Director since May 2024 and previously was the division’s Deputy Director, Acting…
Supervision Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the role and involvement of the compliance function at investment services providers
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusi
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by mid-2026)
*Conduct impact assessment
*Review IRB permissions
*Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
*Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026– PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027– Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027– Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028– FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadline– Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessmentDEADLINE
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027Basel 3.1 rules take effectDEADLINE
1 Jan 2028Internal model approach for market risk takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based A
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by Q2 2026)
*Review applicability
*Assess impact
*Identify policy changes
*Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026- PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025- PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027- All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The restated CRR provisions take effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
We have opened applications for the second cohort of our AI Live Testing service. AI Live Testing is the first of its kind in the financial sector to help firms who are ready to use AI in UK financial markets. Participating firms receive tailored support from our regulatory team and our technical partner Advai to develop, assess and deploy safe and responsible AI.The service helps firms to consider key questions around evaluating AI including governance, risk management and monitoring to help...
The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him £2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal. The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him £2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal.Mr Reynolds was dishonest when he gave pension transfer advice and investment recommendations to his customers, causing them significant harm.Mr Reynolds showed a clear disregard for his customers’ intere...
The CFTC announced three major enforcement actions on January 16, 2026, resolving cases involving **market manipulation (spoofing), misappropriation of confidential information, and unregistered commodity pool operations**. These cases demonstrate the CFTC's continued enforcement focus on fraudulent trading practices and registration violations, with combined penalties exceeding $685,000 and criminal sentences totaling over six years in prison.
What Changed
The enforcement actions establish precedent in three critical areas:
*Market Manipulation (Spoofing): The CFTC secured consent orders against precious metals futures traders for spoofing—placing and canceling orders to create false market impressions. The orders impose three-year and six-month trading bans** and require cease-and-desist compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act's spoofing prohibition.
*Misappropriation and Fictitious Trading: The CFTC obtained permanent injunctive relief requ
What You Need To Do
*For Registered Futures Firms and Banks
trade and post-trade compliance controls
*For Commodity Pool Operators and Investment Advisors:
by-jurisdiction licensing analyses before soliciting investors
*For All Market Participants
Key Dates
September 2019- CFTC enforcement action filed against Smith and Nowak
December 2021- CFTC complaint filed against Miller and Omerta Capital; DOJ criminal charges filed
December 2022- CFTC complaint amended against Miller and Omerta Capital
August 2023- Smith and Nowak sentenced to prison (criminal case)
June 2024- Miller sentenced to prison (criminal case)
The CFTC has announced enforcement updates, including civil monetary penalties and trading bans for spoofing in precious metals futures markets and misappropriating confidential information. These updates highlight the importance of compliance with CFTC regulations. Firms must ensure they are registered and comply with anti-spoofing and anti-fraud regulations.
What Changed
The CFTC has obtained federal court orders imposing civil monetary penalties and trading bans on individuals and firms for spoofing and misappropriating confidential information. The CFTC has also charged an unregistered commodity pool operator with fraud and registration violations.
What You Need To Do
Verify registration with the CFTC at NFA BASIC before committing funds
Review and update anti-spoofing and anti-fraud policies and procedures
Ensure compliance with CFTC regulations regarding commodity pool operations and futures market participation
Key Dates
1 Sept 2021CFTC enforcement action filed against Gregg Smith and Michael Nowak
10 Dec 2021Department of Justice charged Peter Miller with conspiracy to commit commodities fraud
1 Jun 2024Peter Miller sentenced to five months in prison and five months of home confinement
10 Dec 2024Department of Justice charged Travis Ford with conspiracy to commit wire fraud
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, trading bans, and registration revocation
On 16 January 2026, Logic Investments Ltd (Logic Investments) entered special administration. Alex Watkins and Ed Boyle of Interpath Ltd were appointed as joint special administrators. Logic Investments is FCA authorised and regulated to provide wealth management services. On 16 December 2025, Logic Investments agreed to an FCA requirement preventing it from accepting new clients, client money or assets; or moving existing client money or assets without FCA consent. This was done because of c...
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns about offers from the website two-five-management(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the website are offering banking services, in particular fixed-term deposits, and financial services without the required authorisation. They give the impression that their offers originate from TwoFive Management GmbH, which is registered with BaFin as an AIF asset management company, Section 2 (4) of the Germa...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website whiterock-financial(.)eu and against the alleged operator White Rock Financial Consultancy Limited from London, United Kingdom. According to information available to BaFin, the operator is providing financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
On 19 December 2025 the High Court approved the FCA’s proposals to distribute funds to Asset Land investors. The Court has directed the FCA to pay funds to investors in the Asset Land schemes who provide valid bank account details to the FCA on or before 20 February 2026.Investors who have not received previous communications from the FCA or who have not updated their contact information are requested to immediately contact the FCA using the details below.Please ensure this is completed no la...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on website fragfinanz(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, banking transactions, especially fixed-term deposits, financial or investment services are being provided by FragFinanz without the required authorisation.
Alleged employees of Brookfield Asset Management GmbH are contacting investors unsolicited by telephone and email without the necessary permission to offer them alleged fixed-term deposits and alleged pre-IPO shares. In the past, they have also used the website deu-brookfield(.)com, which is no longer accessible. They give the impression that they are cooperating with licensed banks and issuers of pre-IPO shares. This is not the case.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the websites ubpmanagement(.)co, commerzglobal(.)com, longsharks(.)com and paribasgroup(.)net. According to information available to BaFin, the companies UBP Management and Commerz Global, allegedly based in Frankfurt, and Longsharks Capital and Paribas Group, allegedly based in London, are offering financial or investment services and crypto asset services without the required authorisation. The offers do not originate...
The FCA has fined Russel Gerrity £309,843 for using inside information to net himself £128,765. As a consultant, Mr Gerrity had access to information about whether oil and gas had been discovered during the drilling of wells. Between October 2018 and January 2022, he took advantage of this and used inside information to buy shares in Chariot Oil & Gas Limited and Eco (Atlantic) Oil and Gas Plc ahead of announcements that increased their price. On another occasion, he used inside information t...
The CSSF's January 2026 enforcement report documents the results of its 2025 examination campaign on 2024 financial and non-financial disclosures by issuers under Luxembourg's Transparency Law. This publication is critical for compliance professionals because it reveals systematic compliance gaps across financial reporting (IFRS), sustainability reporting (ESRS), and Alternative Performance Measures (APMs), with 27% of enforcement decisions resulting in injunctions for non-compliance.
What Changed
The regulatory landscape has evolved significantly with the introduction of new sustainability reporting requirements:
ESRS Implementation (First Year): 2024 marked the first full reporting year under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), with the CSSF conducting a fact-finding exercise to assess reporting quality. The CSSF noted an overall increase in reporting quality with better-structured reports and more relevant disclosures, though key improvement areas remain in compreh
What You Need To Do
*Financial Information (IFRS)
*Enhanced Note Disclosures
*Cash Flow Statement Presentation
*Segment Reporting Completeness
*Going Concern Assessment
Key Dates
4 July 2025- European Commission adopted Delegated Act amending Taxonomy Disclosures (Omnibus package)
18 August 2025- CSSF published full results of fact-finding exercise on ESRS reporting
5 December 2024- CSSF published enforcement priorities press release for FY2024 reporting
January 2026- CSSF published enforcement results report (current publication)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that J. Russell “Rusty” McGranahan has been named SEC General Counsel. As the SEC’s chief legal officer, Mr. McGranahan will oversee the provision of legal expertise and advice to the Office of the…
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website fidelity-ag(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, banking transactions, especially fixed-term deposits, financial or investment services are being provided on this website without the required authorisation. The fixed-term deposit offers are sent, among others, from the email address festgeld[at]fidelity-ag(.)com. The offers do not originate from the Swiss company Fidelity Treuhand und Verwaltu...
Circular CSSF 19/708 mandates the electronic transmission of specified documents to the CSSF via secure platforms like e-file or SOFiE, effective from February 1, 2019, replacing prior paper or other methods. This updated annex (as amended by Circular CSSF 21/790 and further revisions up to April 1, 2025) standardizes submissions for investment funds and related entities, reducing administrative burdens while ensuring document integrity and CSSF accessibility. Compliance professionals must monitor the dynamic annex list on the CSSF website to avoid nullified submissions.
#
What Changed
Mandatory Electronic-Only Submission: Documents listed in Annex I must be transmitted exclusively via e-file (http://www.e-file.lu) or SOFiE (http://www.cetrel-securities.lu/wp_static/what-do-we-offer/secured-reporting-channel-sofie-sort/), in PDF format supporting read access, printing, copy/paste, and word search; other methods post-February 1, 2019, are null and void.
Dynamic Annex Updates: The annex, published on the CSSF website, is regularly updated (e.g., latest noted April 1, 2025) and i
What You Need To Do
Register/access e-file or SOFiE platforms if not already (test/production environments available since February 2019)
Consult and adhere to the latest Annex I for document list, nomenclatures, and formats (PDF with full functionality)
Ensure submissions are final/official versions matching hard copies; use specified identifiers for UCIs/SIFs/SICARs
Implement processes for automatic/manual transmission (e
Train staff on responsibilities and integrate into reporting workflows; reference CSSF FAQs for closing documents
Key Dates
1 February 2019 - Entry into forceMandatory electronic transmission for listed documents; non-electronic submissions null and void.
28 January 2019 - Publication dateof original Circular CSSF 19/708.
22 December 2021 - Amendmentby Circular CSSF 21/790.
1 April 2025 - Latest annex updatenoted.
Ongoing - Regular checks requiredEntities must monitor CSSF website for annex updates.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low (for new implementations post-2019; medium for ongoing monitoring). This matters for operational efficiency and CSSF relations, as non-compliance risks rejected filings, delays (e.g., approvals under SFDR processes), or supervisory scrutiny, but long-standing rule (since 2019) with esta
According to information available to the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), unknown persons are using Telegram groups and chats to contact German investors. The initiators of these messenger groups purport to be the US company “MacKay Shields”. This is a case of identity fraud.
Introduction Good morning and thank you to Michael for inviting me to speak at the Compliance Institute’s Annual General Meeting. It is always a real pleasure to engage with compliance professionals. At the Central Bank, we recognise the essential role played by the compliance community in ensuring that financial firms are well-run and contributing to a financial system that is trusted and resilient. We also recognise the important role played by the compliance institute, equipping those work...
AI Analysis
This speech by Gerry Cross, Director of Capital Markets and Funds at the Central Bank of Ireland (CBI), outlines key supervisory priorities including securing customers' interests via the revised Consumer Protection Code, Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) implementation, regulatory simplification, resilience, technology leverage, and an evolving outcomes-focused supervision approach. It matters because it signals CBI's expectations for compliance professionals to drive these outcomes in firms, emphasizing proportionality and ongoing engagement amid regulatory evolution. Compliance teams must integrate these themes to align with CBI's shift toward less process-driven, more effective oversight.
#
What Changed
Revised Consumer Protection Code: Introduces new Standards for Business, building on the Code reviewed with industry input; focuses on delivering good outcomes for consumers and the economy.
Individual Accountability Framework (IAF): Implemented 18 months prior (circa mid-2024); enhances clarity on responsibilities, supports governance, and aligns with outcomes-focused regulation rather than enforcement-heavy approaches.
Supervisory Approach Evolution: Shifting in 2025-2026 to risk-based, outcom
What You Need To Do
Implement Revised Consumer Protection Code
Adopt Outcomes-Focused Practices
Engage with CBI
Leverage Technology
Key Dates
24 March 2026- Revised Consumer Protection Code comes into force; firms must ensure full readiness and ongoing embedding of provisions, including new Standards for Business.DEADLINE
January 2026speech).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This speech reinforces imminent obligations like the 24 March 2026 Consumer Protection Code effective date (less than 2 months from speech/publication), requiring immediate readiness checks, but lacks new rules or critical enforcement threats. It matters for long-term alignment with
The European Supervisory Authorities and UK financial regulators sign Memorandum of Understanding on oversight of critical ICT third-party service providers under DORA 14 January 2026 Digital Finance and Innovation International cooperation The European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA – the ESAs) have today signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Bank of England (BoE), the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). This agreement...
The Financial Conduct Authority, Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority (UK regulators) have together signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities to enhance cooperation and oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) that fall under the UK’s CTP regime.
ESMA promotes clarity in communications on ESG strategies 14 January 2026 Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, published today a second thematic note on sustainability-related claims, focusing on ESG strategies. The note concentrates on ESG integration and ESG exclusions, as references to these strategies are often made by market participants and widely referenced in marketing communications directed to ...
AI Analysis
ESMA published a thematic note on January 14, 2026, providing guidance on clear, fair, and not misleading communications regarding ESG strategies, specifically ESG integration and ESG exclusions, to mitigate greenwashing risks in non-regulatory materials like marketing. This matters because sustainability claims heavily influence investor decisions, and misleading communications can lead to supervisory actions, reputational damage, and loss of trust, aligning with existing EU rules under SFDR and related frameworks without imposing new disclosures.
#
What Changed
This is not a formal regulatory change but supervisory guidance reinforcing four principles for non-regulatory communications (e.g., marketing materials, websites, investor presentations, voluntary reports):
Accurate: Claims must fairly represent sustainability profiles without exaggeration, falsehoods, omissions, cherry-picking, vagueness, or misleading ESG terminology/imagery.
Accessible: Information must be easy to understand and navigate, with layered substantiation in electronic formats
What You Need To Do
Review and update all non-regulatory ESG communications (marketing, websites, presentations, DDQs, PPMs) against the four principles and do's/don'ts
Define and clearly explain ESG integration/exclusions (e
Ensure consistency across channels, substantiate claims with accessible evidence, and avoid vagueness or overstatements
Train compliance/marketing teams; monitor for updates as further thematic notes may follow
Cross-reference with first note and regulations like SFDR, Cross-Border Distribution Regulation
Key Dates
14 January 2026- Publication date of the thematic note on ESG strategies (second in series).
1 July 2025- Publication of ESMA's first thematic note on ESG credentials (to be read in combination).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate risk of enforcement for greenwashing in high-visibility ESG marketing, amid rising supervisory scrutiny; non-compliance threatens fines, remediation, and reputational harm as investor focus on sustainability grows. Proactive alignment builds trust and differentiates firms.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 2 der Verordnung vom 22. Juni 2005 über Massnahmen gegenüber der Demokratischen Republik Kongo (SR 946.231.12) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) updated Annex 2 of the Ordinance on Measures against the Democratic Republic of Congo (SR 946.231.12) on January 12, 2026, modifying the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations, with changes effective January 13, 2026, at 23:00 UTC. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it triggers immediate asset freezing, reporting to SECO, and potential AML checks under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (GwG), ensuring compliance with Switzerland's implementation of international sanctions via the Embargo Act (EmbG).
#
What Changed
Amendment to Annex 2 of SR 946.231.12, updating the list of sanctioned individuals, entities, and organizations subject to financial restrictions.
Integration into the SECO Sanctions Management (SESAM) database, with urgent publication on the SECO website.
Reinforcement of prohibitions: asset freezing, ban on making funds available, and reporting of affected business relationships to SECO; does not exempt from GwG Art. 6 due diligence or Art. 9 suspicious activity reports.
These align with ongoi
What You Need To Do
Screen client portfolios and transactions against the updated SESAM database immediately upon effectiveness
Freeze assets of newly listed sanctioned parties and prohibit making funds/resources available
Report affected business relationships to SECO without delay
Conduct GwG Art
Monitor MyFINMA for FINMA alerts and update internal sanctions screening tools
Key Dates
January 12, 2026- WBF publishes amendment to Annex 2.
January 13, 2026, 23:00 UTC- Changes enter into force; immediate implementation required.DEADLINE
December 12, 2026- Related EU sanctions extended to this date (Swiss alignment expected).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate effect from January 13, 2026, 23:00 UTC demands rapid screening and freezing to avoid EmbG violations, which can trigger FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, license actions). Matters due to sanctions lists' frequent updates (e.g., prior May 2024 change) and overlap with AML obl
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 1 der Verordnung vom 28. März 2018 über Massnahmen gegenüber Venezuela (SR 946.231.178.5) publiziert.
AI Analysis
On January 13, 2026, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measures against Venezuela (SR 946.231.178.5), reflecting changes to the list of designated persons and entities subject to Swiss asset freezing measures. This update is critical for Swiss financial institutions and regulated entities as it directly impacts sanctions compliance obligations and requires immediate verification of client and counterparty lists against the revised designations.
What Changed
The regulatory update modifies the designated persons list under Switzerland's unilateral freezing measures against Venezuela. While the search results reference a separate FINMA ordinance (RS 196.127.85) adopted on January 5, 2026, which froze assets of 37 persons in the context of Venezuela, the January 13 update to SR 946.231.178.5 represents an amendment to Switzerland's broader sanctions ordinance framework. The specific changes to Annex 1 require Swiss entities to:
Update their sanctions
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Screening
*Asset Identification
*Freeze Implementation
*Notification
*Transaction Review
Key Dates
January 5, 2026- FINMA ordinance on asset freezing (RS 196.127.85) enters into force at 11 a.m., freezing assets of 37 designated persons
January 13, 2026- SECO publishes updated Annex 1 to SR 946.231.178.5 (the update referenced in your query)
Immediate- Compliance obligations commence upon publication; no grace period for implementationDEADLINE
The PRA and FCA have jointly issued consultation paper CP1/26 proposing to set the **Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) at £113 million for 2026/27**, comprising a £108 million management expenses budget and a £5 million unlevied reserve. This consultation determines the maximum amount the FSCS can levy on authorised financial services firms to fund its statutory compensation scheme operations, directly affecting compliance costs for all regulated entities.
What Changed
The proposed MELL for 2026/27 introduces the following material changes:
Budget increase of £4.4 million from 2025/26 (from approximately £103.6 million to £108 million), broadly aligned with inflation
Nominal reduction of £6.6 million on a like-for-like basis when excluding the cost of enhancements to the FSCS's revolving credit facility (RCF)
Real terms reduction of £11 million when accounting for inflation adjustments
RCF enhancement to £3 billion to support the Bank of England's recapitalis
What You Need To Do
*Review the consultation paper (CP1/26) in detail, particularly Appendices 3 and 4 detailing budget line items and PRA/FCA funding class allocations
*Assess levy impact on your firm's 2026/27 budget based on your regulated business volume and funding class allocation
*Prepare internal stakeholder communication regarding the £4
*Monitor the FSCS January 2026 budget update for detailed cost breakdowns and compensation levy forecasts
*Submit consultation responses if your firm wishes to comment on the proposal by 10 February 2026
Key Dates
10 February 2026– Consultation deadline for comments on CP1/26DEADLINE
1 April 2026– Effective date: proposed MELL applies from start of FSCS financial year
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell have been named as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement. Mr. Tzur joined the Commission on January 6, 2026, as the Deputy Director overseeing the…
AI Analysis
The SEC announced on January 12, 2026, the appointment of Paul H. Tzur and David M. Morrell as Deputy Directors of the Division of Enforcement, with Tzur joining on January 6, 2026, to oversee key operations. This personnel change is part of a broader reorganization replacing Regional Directors with Deputy Directors for more centralized oversight of investigations. It matters for compliance teams as it signals greater consistency in enforcement approaches, potentially affecting investigation timelines, Wells process strategies, and settlement negotiations across SEC-regulated entities.
#
What Changed
This announcement reflects structural reforms rather than new substantive regulations:
Replacement of Regional Directors with Deputy Directors, centralizing reporting from local offices (e.g., Boston, Fort Worth, Atlanta) and specialized units directly to headquarters-led Deputy Directors.
Enhanced supervision of enforcement decisions, aiming for consistency and reduced regional variations in handling investigations.
Complements parallel Wells process reforms under Chairman Paul Atkins, includin
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal protocols for SEC investigations to align with centralized reporting structures, anticipating uniform standards across regions
Train legal/compliance staff on refined Wells process (e
Monitor upcoming SEC communications for Enforcement Director Judge Margaret Ryan's guidance on fraud-focused priorities
Assess current or potential matters for earlier engagement with Deputy Directors on case theories and resolutions
Key Dates
January 6, 2026- Paul H. Tzur joins SEC as Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement.[User Query]
January 12, 2026- SEC announces appointments of Paul Tzur and David Morrell as Deputy Directors.[User Query]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters due to its role in ongoing SEC transition under Chairman Atkins and Director Ryan, promising more predictable enforcement but requiring adaptation to centralized decision-making and Wells enhancements. While not imposing immediate obligations, it could accelerate case r
We reviewed how firms sell complex exchange traded products (ETPs) to retail consumers. Complex ETPs are a subset of the wider ETP market and include high-risk investment strategies that can be difficult for retail consumers to understand.We assessed how firms of different sizes and business models evaluate these products, communicate key risks and monitor outcomes under the Consumer Duty.Given the complexity and risk profile of ETPs, it is essential firms make sure investors have the knowled...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold its third and final outreach event to help firms comply with amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, which is focused on small firms, is open to in-person or virtual attendance, and is…
The FCA has secured a confiscation order of £265,523.96 against Andrew Currie. Mr Currie was convicted in 2023 and sentenced to 2 years 6 months imprisonment for defrauding investors through the collapsed peer-to-peer lending platform Collateral (UK) Ltd.He diverted funds from Collateral investors and used them for personal gain, including the purchase of a property in Spain.At a hearing at Southwark Crown Court on 9 January 2026, Mr Currie was ordered to pay £265,523.96. This amount represen...
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Premium Capital Management (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on 11 September 2025 against alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Premium Capital Management for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties, signaling heightened scrutiny on timely supervisory cooperation amid ongoing AML risks in Luxembourg. Compliance teams should view this as a reminder of the low tolerance for even administrative lapses, with potential for escalated fines in repeat cases.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement precedent under existing rules: non-compliance with Article 5(1) of the AML/CFT Law, which mandates annual submission of a financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") to the CSSF. The fine was calculated per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a), considering circumstances under Article 8-5(1). Publication followed Article 8-6(1) after a proportionality assessment, confirming no market stability risks. No new requirements were introduced;
What You Need To Do
Immediately review internal processes for annual Questionnaire submission, ensuring calendar invites and automated reminders for the 4 April deadline (covering prior year-end data)
Conduct a gap analysis on AML/CFT cooperation obligations under Article 5(1), including response protocols to CSSF reminders or queries
Update compliance calendars and train staff on escalation procedures; document all submissions with proof (e
If late, proactively submit overdue items and request meetings if needed, as non-response forfeits mitigation opportunities
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference year-end for the financial crime Questionnaire.
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for Questionnaire submission to CSSF.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine after non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Publication date of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This €10,000 fine for a straightforward reporting failure demonstrates CSSF's willingness to penalize non-cooperation swiftly, even without aggravating factors, but the amount is modest and targeted at administrative breaches. It matters as a warning shot in Luxembourg's AML landsc
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Sunbricks GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a **€10,000 administrative fine on Sunbricks GP S.à r.l.**, an alternative investment fund manager, for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the April 4, 2025 deadline, despite two formal reminders. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's strict approach to cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework and signals that non-submission of required compliance documentation—even without evidence of underlying financial crime—triggers regulatory penalties.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action clarifying existing obligations:
Mandatory Annual Questionnaire Requirement: All professionals supervised, authorized, or registered by the CSSF must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by April 4 each year, covering the preceding calendar year.
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on AML/CFT establishes a non-negotiable duty to cooperate with the CSSF, which includes timely su
What You Need To Do
regulated entities must
*Establish Calendar Controls
*Designate Responsible Parties
*Prepare Documentation
*Monitor Communications
Key Dates
April 4, 2025– Annual financial crime questionnaire submission deadline (for year ending December 31, 2024)DEADLINE
Before September 11, 2025– Two reminder notices issued by CSSF to Sunbricks GP
September 11, 2025– Administrative fine decision date; questionnaire still not submitted
January 9, 2026– Publication date of enforcement decision
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Capitalis Premiere Group (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Capitalis Premiere Group on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties, signaling heightened scrutiny on timely supervisory cooperation for Luxembourg-regulated entities. Compliance teams should note this as a low-value but public reminder of potential fines for administrative lapses in AML processes.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement precedent under existing rules: non-compliance with the annual financial crime questionnaire submission, mandated by Article 5(1) of the AML/CFT Law, triggers fines per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a). The CSSF considered all relevant circumstances under Article 8-5(1) to set the €10,000 fine amount and published the sanction nominatively after proportionality assessment per Article 8-6(1), confirming no market stabi
What You Need To Do
Ensure timely submission of annual financial crime questionnaires by 4 April each year (for prior calendar year data); implement calendar reminders and escalation processes for CSSF requests
Respond promptly to CSSF reminders or queries on AML/CFT compliance to avoid escalation to fines; document any delays with justification evidence
No retroactive actions needed for this case, but conduct gap analysis on reporting workflows to prevent similar breaches
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submitting the annual financial crime questionnaire covering the year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine on Capitalis Premiere Group for non-submission.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This €10,000 fine is modest but publicly names the firm, amplifying reputational risk in Luxembourg's competitive fund domicile; it matters as a clear CSSF signal of zero tolerance for basic cooperation failures in AML, potentially foreshadowing stricter enforcement amid EU AML har
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Lion Management (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on Lion Management, an alternative investment fund manager, on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's commitment to enforcing cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing framework, with direct implications for all AIFMs regarding timely compliance with supervisory reporting requirements.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action clarifying existing obligations. However, it reinforces critical compliance requirements:
Mandatory Annual Questionnaire Submission: All CSSF-supervised professionals, including AIFMs, must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by the specified deadline (in this case, 4 April 2025 for the year ending 31 December 2024).
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on the fight against mon
What You Need To Do
*Establish Calendar Controls
*Designate Responsible Parties
*Monitor CSSF Communications
*Document Submission
*Escalate Non-Compliance Immediately
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submission of annual financial crime questionnaire for year ending 31 December 2024DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed administrative fine after two reminders went unheeded
9 January 2026- Publication date of the administrative sanction decision
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Max Gain Capital S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on Max Gain Capital S.à r.l., an alternative investment fund manager, on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the April 2025 deadline. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's active monitoring of AML/CFT compliance obligations and its willingness to sanction non-cooperation, even for procedural failures unrelated to substantive money laundering violations.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action clarifying existing obligations:
Mandatory Annual Questionnaire Requirement: All CSSF-supervised professionals must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime covering the preceding calendar year.
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on AML/CFT imposes a non-negotiable duty to cooperate with CSSF supervisory requests.
Enforcement Escalation: The CSSF will issue reminders before imposin
What You Need To Do
regulated entities must
*Identify Reporting Obligations
*Calendar Management
*Documentation
*Escalation Protocol
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submission of financial crime questionnaire for the year ending 31 December 2024DEADLINE
Before 11 September 2025- CSSF issued two reminders to Max Gain Capital after the missed deadlineDEADLINE
11 September 2025- CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine
9 January 2026- CSSF published the administrative sanction decision
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Agriland Management S.A. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF), Luxembourg's financial regulator, imposed a **EUR 10,000 administrative fine on Agriland Management S.A.**, an alternative investment fund manager, on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit a mandatory annual financial crime questionnaire by the April 2025 deadline. This enforcement action demonstrates the CSSF's commitment to enforcing cooperation obligations under Luxembourg's anti-money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT) framework and signals heightened scrutiny of compliance with supervisory reporting requirements.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but rather an enforcement action that clarifies existing obligations:
Mandatory Annual Reporting: All CSSF-supervised professionals must submit an annual questionnaire on financial crime by 4 April each year, covering the preceding calendar year.
Cooperation Obligation: Article 5(1) of the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on AML/CFT establishes a non-negotiable duty to cooperate with the CSSF, including timely submission of requested documentation.
Enforcement Esc
What You Need To Do
*Establish Reporting Calendars
*Designate Responsible Personnel
*Respond to Regulatory Requests
*Document Justifications
*Monitor Supervisory Communications
Key Dates
4 April 2025– Deadline for submission of financial crime questionnaire for year ending 31 December 2024DEADLINE
Before 11 September 2025– Two reminder notices issued by CSSF to Agriland Management S.A.
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager Bedrock I GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) Bedrock I GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties and serves as a public warning to supervised entities on timely supervisory compliance. It matters because it demonstrates that even modest fines are pursued for basic reporting lapses, potentially signaling heightened scrutiny on AIFMs' AML processes amid ongoing regulatory focus on financial crime risks.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended Law of 12 November 2004 on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT Law). Specifically, it reaffirms the mandatory annual submission of the CSSF's financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") by supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, as part of the cooperation duty in Article 5(1). The fine was cal
What You Need To Do
Immediately verify submission status of the 2024 Questionnaire (or any outstanding); if overdue, submit promptly with justification to mitigate further escalation
Implement automated calendar alerts and internal workflows for all CSSF reporting deadlines, including annual AML/CFT Questionnaire
Conduct a compliance gap analysis on cooperation obligations under Article 5(1) AML/CFT Law, documenting reminder responses and evidence retention
Train senior managers and compliance teams on supervisory interactions, including rights to request in-person meetings before fines
Review governance for timely escalation of CSSF reminders to decision-makers
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference period end for the Questionnaire covering financial crime compliance.DEADLINE
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for Questionnaire submission to CSSF.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date of administrative fine imposition (€10,000) after non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Publication date of the sanction decision by CSSF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a post-facto enforcement on a past breach (2024 reporting cycle), with the €10,000 fine relatively low, indicating proportionality for a first-time or isolated lapse. It matters as a leading indicator of CSSF's 2025-2026 focus on AML cooperation, with multiple similar AIFM
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager (AIFM) C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite two reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of AML reporting duties and serves as a public warning to supervised entities on the consequences of non-cooperation. It matters because it demonstrates that even modest fines will be levied for procedural lapses, potentially signaling increased scrutiny on timely AML compliance submissions amid broader regulatory focus on financial crime risks.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended AML/CFT Law:
Annual Questionnaire Submission: Supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, must submit an annual financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire") to CSSF as part of the cooperation duty in Article 5(1).
Fine Provisions: Fines are imposed per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), and 8-4(3)(a), with amounts determined by relevant
What You Need To Do
Immediate Review
Remediation if Late
Process Enhancements
Key Dates
31 December 2024- Reference year-end for the financial crime Questionnaire.
4 April 2025- Statutory deadline for submitting the Questionnaire for the year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed the €10,000 administrative fine after noting non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication of the sanction decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is a low-value fine (€10,000) for a procedural breach, not involving substantive AML failures like suspicious transactions or sanctions screening delays seen in higher fines (e.g., €185,000 on Rakuten Bank). It matters as a precedent for CSSF's willingness to publicly name-and
Administrative sanction imposed on the alternative investment fund manager C5 S.à r.l. (“AIFM”)
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €10,000 administrative fine on alternative investment fund manager C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. on 11 September 2025 for failing to submit its annual financial crime questionnaire by the 4 April 2025 deadline, despite reminders, breaching the cooperation obligation under Article 5(1) of Luxembourg's AML/CFT Law of 12 November 2004. This enforcement action underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of reporting duties in AML/CFT compliance, serving as a warning to supervised entities on the consequences of administrative delays. It matters because it highlights low-tolerance for even minor procedural lapses, potentially signaling increased scrutiny on annual reporting amid broader AML/CFT priorities.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement of existing obligations under the amended AML/CFT Law:
Article 5(1) mandates supervised professionals, including AIFMs under Article 3(2) of the Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs, to cooperate fully with CSSF, including submitting the annual financial crime questionnaire ("Questionnaire").
Breach occurred due to non-submission of the 2024 year-end Questionnaire, with fine determined per Articles 8-4(1), 8-4(2)(f), 8-4(3)(a), and 8-
What You Need To Do
Review and confirm timely submission of all pending or future CSSF financial crime questionnaires; establish automated calendar reminders for annual deadlines (e
Implement escalation protocols for CSSF reminders, ensuring immediate response and submission within days, not weeks
Conduct internal audit of AML/CFT cooperation obligations, documenting justifications for any delays and preparing evidence for potential CSSF hearings or meetings
Update compliance policies to prioritize Article 5(1) duties, including training for responsible persons on fine risks under Article 8-4
Key Dates
4 April 2025- Deadline for submission of financial crime Questionnaire covering year ending 31 December 2024.DEADLINE
11 September 2025- Date CSSF imposed €10,000 administrative fine on C5 Haven Cyber GP S.à r.l. for non-submission despite reminders.
9 January 2026- Date of CSSF publication announcing the sanction.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to CSSF's demonstrated willingness to impose and publicize fines for straightforward reporting failures, even at €10,000, which could escalate for repeat or severe cases; acts as a precedent amid rising AML/CFT enforcement (e.g., larger fines like €214,000 in similar co
Administrative sanction imposed on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A.
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed a €102,000 administrative fine on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A. on 23 July 2025 for breaches in its professional obligations as a depositary of non-financial assets under the AIFM Law, identified during an on-site inspection from February 2023 to January 2024 covering activities up to December 2022. This enforcement action highlights CSSF's scrutiny of depositary functions, particularly risk assessment and oversight controls, serving as a warning for similar entities to strengthen compliance amid rising supervisory focus on AIFM depositaries.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it enforces existing requirements under Article 51(1) (1st and 7th indents) and Article 51(2) (1st sub-paragraph, 3rd indent) of the amended Law of 12 July 2013 on AIFMs (AIFM Law), and related provisions like Article 92(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 (CDR 231/2013). Key breaches include: failure to properly assess risks tied to AIFs' strategies and AIFMs' organization for oversight processes; lack of processes to ve
What You Need To Do
related entities) must
Conduct immediate gap analyses on risk assessment processes for AIF strategies and AIFM organization per Article 92(1) CDR 231/2013
Implement robust verification processes for AIFM compliance with asset delegation rules
Ensure availability of key documentation and evidence of controls for the depositary function, addressing pre-2022 gaps if applicable
Develop and test oversight processes, leveraging self-identified improvements and action plans as mitigating factors, as JTC did prior to inspection
Key Dates
February 2023 - January 2024Period of CSSF on-site inspection on depositary obligations, covering activities up to December 2022.
23 July 2025Date CSSF imposed the €102,000 administrative fine on JTC (Luxembourg) S.A.
9 January 2026Date of official CSSF publication announcing the sanction.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This matters due to the fine's size (€102,000), reflecting breach accumulation, severity, and duration, despite JTC's partial remediation; it signals intensified CSSF on-site scrutiny of depositary functions post-2023 inspections, with potential for higher penalties absent proactive
Principles for risk-based supervision: a critical pillar for ESMA’s simplification and burden reduction efforts 09 January 2026 Supervision The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, published today its principles for risk-based supervision . These principles support a common and effective EU-wide supervisory culture and strengthen the EU single market. The principles on risk-based supervision outline key concepts and foundationa...
Long Form Report – Practical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by investment firms – Mission and related reports of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors)
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Advocate for Small Business Capital Formation today published and delivered to Congress its 2025 staff report that serves as a comprehensive and data-rich resource on capital-raising dynamics…
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its directors for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company M Capital Partners €200,000 and its directors Rudy Secco (€70,000) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000) on 31 December 2025 for breaches of professional obligations spanning August 2019 to December 2023, including non-operational investment systems, deficient AML/CFT procedures, inadequate conflict of interest management, and poor due diligence traceability. This decision underscores AMF's focus on operational robustness in asset management, with personal liability for senior managers, signaling heightened enforcement risk for similar firms. Compliance teams must prioritize reviewing internal procedures to avoid comparable sanctions, as appeals are possible but do not suspend obligations.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing AMF requirements under the French Monetary and Financial Code for asset managers to maintain operational procedures. Key breaches highlighted include:
Imprecise investment allocation processes lacking traceability, rendering systems non-operational.
Failure to fulfill conflict of interest identification, prevention, and management obligations.
Deficient AML/CFT systems with inadequate due diligence on fund assets/lia
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of investment processes for operationality, traceability, and precision in allocation rules
Enhance AML/CFT systems
Review conflict of interest frameworks for identification, prevention, and management; document controls rigorously
Senior managers
Audit marketing materials, fee retrocessions, and valuation procedures (e
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines on M Capital Partners and directors.
08 January 2026- Public news release date for the decision.
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of breaches investigated.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This reflects a pattern of 2025-2026 AMF fines on asset managers for operational/AML failures (e.g., €1.3M on Altaroc 15 Sep 2025; €400k on Eternam 9 Sep 2025), indicating intensified scrutiny and personal accountability. Firms risk multimillion fines and reputational damage; immedia
Update of Circular CSSF 24/853 on the Long Form Report (as amended by Circular CSSF 25/870) – Practical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by investment firms Mission and related reports of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/904 updates Circular CSSF 24/853 (as amended by Circular CSSF 25/870) by introducing a revised Long Form Report (LFR) for investment firms, featuring a digital self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) and enhanced auditor reports focused on AML/CFT and risk management. This matters because it aligns reporting with CSSF's risk-based supervision under CSSF 4.0, reduces redundancies, applies proportionality based on business models, and mandates digital submission to improve efficiency and data analysis.
#
What Changed
Revised LFR Structure: Comprises four parts in a single digital document: (1) yearly SAQ completed by investment firms; (2) descriptive elements verified by approved statutory auditors (REAs); (3) AML/CFT report with risk assessments, declarations on audits, and data on incomplete fund transfers; (4) REA's independent assessment of ML/FT risks and organizational aspects.
Digital Format: Completion and submission via CSSF's online portal, supporting CSSF 4.0 digital strategy for efficient process
What You Need To Do
Investment Firms
REAs/Auditors
Key Dates
Financial year ending 31 December 2024- Applicability of revised LFR to all investment firms; submissions begin for this period onward on a yearly basis.
No specific submission deadline stated- Yearly production required via CSSF portal; firms should align with existing annual reporting cycles for auditors (typically post-year-end).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Applies immediately to FY ending 31 December 2024 reports, requiring swift updates to reporting processes, digital tools, and AML/CFT documentation amid CSSF's risk-based shift; non-compliance risks supervisory actions, as LFR directly informs CSSF oversight on key prudential/AML are
Pension schemes must now publish transparent data on their performance, costs, and service quality, according to new proposals from the FCA, DWP, and TPR. Pension schemes will need to publish clear data on their performance, costs and quality of service, under proposals announced today by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and The Pensions Regulator (TPR). If a pension offers poor value, firms and trustees must then fix it by moving savers to bet...
This page contains information about fines published during 2026. The total amount of fines so far is £371,700. Firm or individual finedDateAmountReasonRichard Adam07/01/2026£232,800The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Rule 1.3.3R, Listing Principle 1 and Premium Listing Principle 2.Zafar Khan07/01/2026£138,900The Final Notice refers to knowing concern in breaches of Article 15 of the Market Abuse Regulations, Listing Ru...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed amendments to the rules that define which registered investment companies, investment advisers, and business development companies qualify as small entities for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility…
AI Analysis
The SEC proposed amendments on January 7, 2026, to expand the definitions of "small entities" under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) for registered investment advisers (RIAs), investment companies, and business development companies by significantly raising asset thresholds last updated in 1998. This would increase the number of qualifying small entities, enabling the SEC to better assess regulatory impacts and potentially provide tailored relief like extended compliance timelines during rulemaking. It matters because it could indirectly reduce compliance burdens for mid-sized firms by influencing future SEC rules to minimize disproportionate effects on smaller players.
#
What Changed
Raise the RAUM threshold for RIAs to qualify as small entities from $25 million to $1 billion, with conforming changes for control affiliates.
Increase the net asset threshold for investment companies from $50 million to $10 billion.
Update aggregation of related funds from "group of related investment companies" to "family of investment companies" as defined in Form N-CEN for easier identification.
Introduce inflation adjustments to thresholds every 10 years via SEC order, without formal rulema
What You Need To Do
Submit public comments by the deadline to influence thresholds, alternatives (e
Monitor Federal Register for exact publication and comment instructions; review proposed rule and fact sheet on SEC site (https://www
Assess internal status
No immediate compliance changes, as this affects SEC rulemaking process only; prepare for potential indirect impacts via future rules
Key Dates
January 7, 2026- SEC issues proposal and press release.
60 days after Federal Register publication- Public comment period closes (publication expected shortly after January 7; exact date TBD, likely March 2026 based on estimates).
No stated adoption date- Typically at least one year post-comment period under normal processes.
Every 10 years post-adoption- Inflation adjustments to thresholds via SEC order.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This proposal does not impose direct new requirements or alter existing obligations—it's procedural for SEC's RFA analyses during rulemaking. However, adoption could lead to meaningful indirect benefits for mid-sized RIAs and funds, such as longer compliance phases or reduced burden
In the WhatsApp groups, investors are recommended to invest in financial instruments that can then be traded via the platform h5.bluealphasystem(.)net or the aforementioned app.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers in WhatsApp groups, which are allegedly operated by Cantor Fitzgerald and led by Leopold Schneider. BaFin is not aware of the existence of this person. According to information available to BaFin, recommendations for the purchase of financial instruments and cryptocurrencies, which can allegedly be traded via CDAfin app, are offered in various WhatsApp groups. According to the current state of knowledge, there is no connec...
On 12 November the PRA hosted a roundtable meeting with Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of systemically important firms operating in the UK, to discuss Future Banking Data (FBD).
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns about offers on the website capitalholdings(.)icu. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the websites are offering banking transactions and financial services without the required authorisation.
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns about fixed-term deposit offers from the website sicherangelegt(.)de. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the website are offering banking services, in particular fixed-term deposits, without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers in WhatsApp groups, which are allegedly operated by Baird Capital and led by a Thomas Becker. BaFin is not aware of the existence of this person. According to information available to BaFin, recommendations for the purchase of financial instruments and cryptocurrencies are offered in WhatsApp groups and the so-called Baird Capital Investment Program III is being promoted. According to the current state of knowledge, there ...
The FCA has fined 2 former finance directors for their part in misleading statements being issued by Carillion plc. Richard Adam and Zafar Khan were both aware of serious financial troubles in Carillion’s UK construction business but failed to reflect this in company announcements or alert the Board and audit committee, leading to poor oversight.Mr Adam and Mr Khan have been fined £232,800 and £138,900, respectively. The fines were imposed after Mr Adam and Mr Khan withdrew their challenges t...
Warning Forex and binary options Warning Savings protection The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against several entities offering in France investments in the unregulated foreign exchange market (Forex) and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
ESMA publishes report on cross-border marking of funds including statistics on notifications 06 January 2026 The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its third report on marketing requirements and marketing communications under the Regulation on cross-border distribution of funds . For the first time, the report includes statistics on notifications of cross-border marketing of funds. Drawing on input from Na...
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Swiss Federal Council adopted a new ordinance (RS 196.127.85) on 5 January 2026, mandating the immediate freezing of all assets in Switzerland belonging to Nicolás Maduro and 36 associated persons, under the Federal Act on the Freezing and Restitution of Illicit Assets held by Foreign Politically Exposed Persons (FIAA). This precautionary measure prevents asset outflows amid Venezuela's political upheaval, complementing existing sanctions since 2018, and enables future mutual legal assistance for potential restitution to the Venezuelan people. It matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate reporting and freezing obligations with severe penalties for non-compliance.
#
What Changed
Immediate asset freeze: All assets of any kind held by the 37 listed persons (Nicolás Maduro and associates) in Switzerland must be frozen without delay; this targets individuals not previously sanctioned under the Embargo Act.
Reporting obligation: Persons and institutions, including financial intermediaries, must report frozen assets or knowledge thereof to the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) per FIAA provisions.
Duration: The freeze is valid for four years until 4 January
What You Need To Do
Screen and identify
Freeze assets
Report to MROS
Internal updates
Document compliance
Key Dates
5 January 2026, 11 a.m.Ordinance enters into force; immediate asset freezing and reporting required.DEADLINE
4 January 2030Asset freeze expires after four years, unless extended or revoked.
5 January 2026.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical. This demands immediate action as the freeze took effect on 5 January 2026 at 11 a.m., with custodial penalties up to three years for failures; given today's date (25 January 2026), firms must confirm compliance now to avoid fines up to CHF 250,000 or enforcement. It heightens AML/
ESMA launches selection of Consolidated Tape Provider for OTC derivatives 05 January 2026 MiFID - Secondary Markets Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is launching the first selection procedure for the Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for over the counter (OTC) derivatives. Entities interested to apply are encouraged to register and submit their requests to participate in the selection procedure by 11 February 20...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched the first selection procedure for a **Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for OTC derivatives**, with applications due by 11 February 2026 and a decision expected by early July 2026. This initiative establishes a critical market infrastructure component to enhance transparency and efficiency in the EU's OTC derivatives market by consolidating post-trade data into a single, continuous electronic stream.
What Changed
The regulatory framework introduces several substantive requirements:
CTP Mandate: The selected provider will consolidate post-trade data from trading venues and other data contributors into a unified electronic stream, enabling market participants to access accurate, timely information.
Data Scope: The CTP will collect and disseminate OTC derivatives data in accordance with ESMA's Final Report on transparency for derivatives, with specific technical standards governing pre- and post-trade tra
What You Need To Do
*For prospective CTP applicants
*For trading venues and data contributors
trade OTC derivatives data to the selected CTP from 1 March 2027
minute maximum delay for real-time dissemination
*For market participants
Key Dates
11 February 2026– Deadline for entities to register and submit requests to participate in the selection procedureDEADLINE
Early July 2026– ESMA to adopt reasoned decision on selected applicant
1 September 2026– Mandatory use of new OTC derivatives identifying reference data (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1003)
1 March 2027– Single application date for all derivatives-related changes: amendments to RTS 2, Package Order RTS, and OTC derivatives CTP data requirements
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has sufficient grounds to suspect that TPK Vermögensverwaltungs KG is offering securities to the public in Germany in the form of shares in AuA 24 AG without the required prospectus. There are no indications that the conditions for exemption from the prospectus requirement are met.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cicely LaMothe, Deputy Director of the Division of Corporation Finance, has retired from the agency.“Cicely has gone above and beyond the call of duty over the past twenty-four years to serve…
Warning Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several entities proposing to invest in miscellaneous assets without being authorized to do so
ESMA publishes latest Spotlight on Markets newsletter featuring updates on market integration and transparency 23 December 2025 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published the latest edition of its Spotlight on Markets newsletter. This edition opens with ESMA welcoming the European Commission’s ambitious proposal on market integration, underlining the importance of deeper, more integrated and ef...
AI Analysis
ESMA's latest *Spotlight on Markets* newsletter (November/December 2025 issue, published 23 December 2025) summarizes key regulatory updates on EU market integration, transparency enhancements, and supervisory actions, including welcoming the European Commission's market integration proposal and announcing an equity consolidated tape provider (CTP) selection. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals accelerating EU efforts to deepen capital markets integration, improve data transparency, and strengthen oversight under MiFID II and DORA, potentially requiring firms to adapt governance, reporting, and conflict management practices.
#
What Changed
ESMA welcomes the European Commission's 4 December 2025 legislative package on market integration, emphasizing robust governance and market infrastructure for deeper EU capital markets.
Announcement of selected applicant for the equity consolidated tape provider (CTP), advancing MiFIR transparency for equity markets by improving post-trade data consolidation and access.
Publication of ESMA's final report on Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for non-equity transparency, clarifying pre- and pos
What You Need To Do
Review the final non-equity transparency RTS and assess impacts on trading and reporting systems for compliance by any upcoming application dates (not specified)
Evaluate MiFID II conflicts of interest policies in preparation for the CSA; conduct internal audits and enhance training/staff attestations on identification and mitigation
Monitor equity CTP rollout for changes to post-trade data access and costs; update vendor contracts if applicable
For DORA-impacted firms, map exposures to designated critical ICT providers and strengthen due diligence, contractual clauses, and exit strategies
Asset managers
Key Dates
4 December 2025- European Commission publishes market integration legislative package; legislative process expected to take at least one year.
23 December 2025- Newsletter publication date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - The newsletter highlights finalized standards (e.g., RTS, CTP) and imminent actions (e.g., CSA, DORA designations) that require proactive preparation, but lacks hard deadlines or immediate mandates. It matters because it previews intensified supervision on transparency, conflicts,
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
Update of Circular CSSF 24/850 on the practical rules concerning the descriptive report and the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted on an annual basis by support PFS, as well as the engagement of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of support PFS and practical rules concerning the management letter and the separate report to be drawn up on an annual basis.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/903 updates Circular CSSF 24/850, refining practical rules for support Professional of the Financial Sector (support PFS) in Luxembourg regarding their annual descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, and the roles of approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés). It specifies requirements for auditors' engagement, management letters, and separate annual reports. This matters for support PFS as it enhances supervisory oversight, ensures consistent reporting quality, and strengthens internal controls, directly impacting compliance and audit processes amid CSSF's focus on robust PFS supervision.
#
What Changed
Updates to Descriptive Report and Self-Assessment Questionnaire: Refines content, format, and submission requirements for support PFS's annual submissions, emphasizing more detailed disclosures on operations, risks, and controls (building on CSSF 24/850).
Auditor Engagement Rules: Introduces specific practical guidelines for approved statutory auditors, including mandatory scope of work, independence confirmations, and standardized procedures for reviewing support PFS reports.
Management Letter
What You Need To Do
*Review and Update Processes
*Engage/Confirm Auditors
*Implement Templates and Testing
*Training and Governance
*Submit on Time
Key Dates
1 January 2026 - Effective DateApplies to annual reporting cycles starting for financial year 2025 onwards.
30 April (annually) - Submission DeadlineSupport PFS must submit descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, management letter, and separate auditor report to CSSF by 30 April following the financial year-end (first applicable: 30 April 2026 for FY 2025).DEADLINE
31 December 2025 - Preparation MilestoneAuditors must be engaged and initial scoping completed by year-end 2025 for FY 2025 compliance.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This is high urgency for support PFS due to the impending 30 April 2026 deadline for FY 2025 submissions, with non-compliance risking supervisory fines, license reviews, or reputational damage under CSSF's PFS enforcement regime. It matters as it tightens audit accountability, potenti
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns against WhatsApp groups such as „S373 Robeco Kernmitgliedergruppe“, “M2 Robeco Value Investing Kreis“ and „999 Robeco Investment Strategiezentrum - Blockhandel“, which are allegedly operated by the Frankfurt a.M.-based company Robeco Deutschland, Zweigniederlassung der Robeco Institutional Asset Management B.V. („Robeco“). In the WhatsApp groups consumers are enticed to trade financial products via the app „RBC NL“. It is suspected that...
Practical rules concerning the descriptive report and the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted on an annual basis by support PFS.Engagement of the réviseurs d’entreprises agréés (approved statutory auditors) of support PFS and practical rules concerning the management letter and the separate report to be drawn up on an annual basis.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 24/850, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/903, establishes practical rules for support Professional of the Financial Sector (support PFS) in Luxembourg to submit annual descriptive reports and self-assessment questionnaires, while also defining the roles of approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés) in issuing management letters and separate reports. This guidance standardizes supervisory reporting and audit processes to enhance oversight of support PFS, which provide essential back-office services to authorized PFS. It matters because non-compliance risks supervisory sanctions, reputational damage, and operational disruptions for entities reliant on support PFS structures.
#
What Changed
Standardized Reporting Templates: Introduces detailed formats and content requirements for the annual descriptive report and self-assessment questionnaire, covering governance, risk management, internal controls, and operational metrics specific to support PFS activities (e.g., IT services, administrative support, custody).
Auditor Engagement Rules: Mandates approved statutory auditors to perform specific procedures, issue a management letter highlighting control weaknesses, and prepare a separa
What You Need To Do
Annual Reporting Cycle
February to review submissions, test controls, and issue management letter (flagging deficiencies) plus separate compliance report
Governance Updates
Auditor Coordination
Record-Keeping
Key Dates
31 March annually- Deadline for submission of descriptive report, self-assessment questionnaire, management letter, and separate auditor report to CSSF (first applicable for FY 2024 reporting due 31 March 2025).DEADLINE
1 January 2025- Effective date of original Circular CSSF 24/850.
15 December 2025- Effective date of amendments in Circular CSSF 25/903, applicable to 2025 reporting cycle onwards.
End of February annually- Support PFS must engage auditors and provide necessary data to enable timely report preparation.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This is a recurring annual obligation with a firm 31 March deadline, where delays trigger automatic CSSF notifications and potential fines (up to €250,000 per Law 1993). It matters for support PFS as it intensifies scrutiny on operational resilience in a post-SFI (2021) landscape, wh
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed charges against purported crypto asset trading platforms Morocoin Tech Corp., Berge Blockchain Technology Co. Ltd., and Cirkor Inc. and investment clubs AI Wealth Inc., Lane Wealth Inc., AI Investment…
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers AMF Enforcement Committee fines the depositary CACEIS Bank for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined CACEIS Bank €3.5 million and issued a warning on 17 December 2025 for breaches of its professional obligations as depositary for seven French-law UCITS funds managed by H2O AM LLP (later transferred to H2O AM Europe). This decision underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of depositary oversight duties, particularly in verifying fund managers' investment monitoring systems, asset valuations, and compliance with prospectus constraints like issuer limits and security ratings. It matters for compliance teams as it highlights personal accountability risks and potential fines for inadequate due diligence in fund depositary roles, signaling heightened scrutiny amid past H2O fund issues.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing obligations under French UCITS rules (transposing UCITS Directive V) for depositaries. Key upheld objections include:
Failure to perform sufficient checks on the asset management company's (AMC) systems for monitoring UCITS investment ratios and valuing unlisted securities.
Inadequate verification of investment decision legality, such as compliance with prospectus limits on debt security ratings, derivative types, and
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance oversight processes
Training and audits
Monitor appeals
Key Dates
17 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date: €3.5M fine and warning imposed on CACEIS Bank.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (Dec 2025) decision directly impacts depositaries with €3.5M precedent for oversight failures, amid AMF's pattern of multi-million fines (e.g., €5.67M total in related 2024 case involving CACEIS). It elevates risks for UCITS/AIF depositaries handling non-standard assets,
A growing number of investment schemes are being promoted unlawfully, are high risk and may even be scams. We've identified a growing number of investment schemes in holiday lodges and holiday homes being promoted to UK consumers by companies that are not FCA authorised.They may be unregulated collective investment schemes, where several investors invest their money. The schemes are being promoted unlawfully, are high risk and may even be scams. We remind consumers that if you invest in an un...
AI Analysis
The FCA has issued a consumer warning about unregulated investment schemes in holiday lodges and holiday homes, which are often promoted unlawfully by unauthorised firms, posing high risks or outright scams. These schemes typically involve collective investments without FCA authorisation, breaching UK financial promotion and collective investment scheme (CIS) rules. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals heightened FCA scrutiny on unauthorised promotions, potential enforcement actions, and the need for firms to review marketing materials and client referrals to avoid facilitation risks.
#
What Changed
This is not a formal rulemaking or policy change but a consumer alert and enforcement signal under existing regulations. Key reminders include:
Unauthorised firms cannot lawfully promote collective investment schemes (CIS) under section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
Holiday park schemes pooling investor funds for lodge purchases and management often qualify as unregulated CIS, making promotions illegal.
No new requirements are introduced, but the FCA emphasises its on
What You Need To Do
Immediate verification
Client communication review
Training and monitoring
Internal reporting
Due diligence
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High. This alert indicates active FCA enforcement priority on consumer-facing scams in property-linked investments, with risks of fines, bans, or asset freezes for non-compliance (e.g., similar to past actions against mini-bond issuers). Firms face heightened supervisory visits or thematic
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about “bearer bonds” being offered for subscription by Marketplace24-7 GmbH on the website non-dom(.)group. BaFin suspects the company of conducting banking business without the required authorisation. The company is furthermore suspected of making an unauthorised public offer of securities without a prospectus. Under the German Securities Prospectus Act (Wertpapierprospektgesetz - WpPG), a prospectus is required for an offer...
On 16 December 2025, BaFin imposed two administrative fines amounting to €560,000 on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG. The company had contravened obligations under the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz - WpHG). At the beginning of 2022, flatexDEGIRO Bank AG advertised free investment services on two of its websites without clearly indicating that a processing fee would be charged on a regular basis. flatexDEGIRO Bank AG adapted its practices to comply with the legal requirements in ...
AI Analysis
BaFin imposed €560,000 in administrative fines on flatexDEGIRO Bank AG on December 16, 2025, for misleading marketing of investment services that advertised free offerings without clearly disclosing mandatory processing fees. This enforcement action underscores BaFin's strict interpretation of fair and transparent marketing requirements under the German Securities Trading Act (WpHG) and demonstrates that even corrective action taken by firms does not eliminate regulatory penalties for past violations.
What Changed
The enforcement action clarifies BaFin's expectations regarding fair and clear marketing communications for investment services:
Investment services providers must explicitly and unambiguously disclose all material costs, including processing fees, when advertising services as "free"
Marketing materials must present both benefits and risks of services in a balanced manner, with relevant risks highlighted alongside advantages
These obligations apply across all marketing channels, including compa
What You Need To Do
*For flatexDEGIRO Bank AG (already completed)
Modify marketing materials to clearly and explicitly disclose all material costs and fees
Ensure balanced presentation of benefits and risks across all marketing channels
*For all investment services providers (preventive compliance):
ESMA publishes 2024 data on cross-border investment activity of firms 22 December 2025 Investor protection The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, in cooperation with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), completed an analysis of the cross-border provision of investment services in 2024 . Data was gathered from investment firms across 30 jurisdictions in the EU/EEA. The main findings include: Around 370 financial firms provid...
Long term investment Shares Artificial intelligence Retail investors Journalists AMF 2025 Barometer: in search of autonomy, many French people turn to artificial intelligence when they want to invest
New Q&As available 19 December 2025 Digital Finance and Innovation Fund Management Market Abuse Prospectus Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published or updated the following Questions and Answers: Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD) Directive Exclusion related to UNGC/OECD Guidelines (2734) Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) rating activities Regulation Group-affiliated small ESG ra...
AI Analysis
ESMA published new Q&As on December 19, 2025, addressing practical implementation questions across multiple regulatory frameworks including AIFMD, ESG rating activities, and sustainable finance rules. These guidance documents clarify regulatory expectations and promote consistent supervisory approaches across EU member states, making them essential for firms operating in affected areas to ensure compliant implementation.
What Changed
The December 19, 2025 Q&A publication covers several regulatory domains:
AIFMD Exclusion Criteria: New guidance on the UNGC/OECD Guidelines exclusion (Q&A 2734), clarifying when alternative investment fund managers must apply exclusion-related requirements
ESG Rating Activities: Updated Q&As addressing regulatory requirements for ESG rating providers, including clarification on group-affiliated small ESG rating activities
Sustainable Finance: Continued development of guidance under SFDR and r
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (0-30 days)
*Short-term (1-3 months)
level information
advertised securities per Annex 21 requirements
Key Dates
19 December 2025- ESMA published new Q&As across multiple regulatory domains
30 June 2025- ESMA's final report on prospectus ESG disclosure requirements became effective (referenced in search results as June 6, 2025 publication date)
22 September 2025- ESMA published updated consolidated Q&A on SFDR and Level 2 Regulation with new PAI disclosure guidance
17 October 2025- ESMA updated MiCAR Q&As on execution service classification
2025Q&As. Firms should consult ESMA's official guidance portal for specific transition periods.*
The FCA has removed all regulatory permissions from Verus Financial Services Limited requiring it to stop conducting all regulated activities and imposed a more stringent assets restriction. The action follows concerns that the firm has repeatedly breached an existing asset restriction, which prevented it from selling, transferring or diminishing its assets without our approval. It also failed to comply with a Financial Ombudsman Service decision. We issued a First Supervisory Notice (PDF) on...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
ESMA selects EuroCTP to become the first Consolidated Tape Provider for shares and ETFs 19 December 2025 Press Releases Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has selected EuroCTP as the first Consolidated Tape Provider (CTP) for shares and exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the EU, in a step forward for the transparency of equity markets in the EU. Natasha Cazenave, ESMA’s Executive Director, said: “Today’s announcement...
In this, his final blog for 2025, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf reflects on Ireland and the euro area’s economic performance and looks ahead to 2026, drawing on the Quarterly Bulletin and latest eurosystem staff projections published this week.
relating to specialised investment funds, investment companies in risk capital and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/901 consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg specialised investment funds (SIFs), investment companies in risk capital (SICARs), and undertakings for collective investment subject to Part II of the Law of 17 December 2010 (Part II UCIs), including their sub-funds. It streamlines investment rules, diversification limits, borrowing, disclosures, and risk management while enhancing flexibility for sophisticated investors and formalizing prior informal guidance, reducing regulatory complexity without compromising investor protection.
#
What Changed
Diversification and investment limits: Introduces tailored percentage-based thresholds; for funds marketed to unsophisticated retail investors, limits remain at 25% per issuer/UCI/asset, raised to 50% per issuer/UCI/asset or 70% per infrastructure investment for well-informed/professional investor funds, with CSSF derogations possible on justification. Limits apply on assets/commitments basis with look-through for intermediary vehicles.
SICAR-specific rules: Confirms risk capital investments (e.
What You Need To Do
Review and update fund documents (e
Assess and document compliance with new/relaxed diversification, borrowing, and SICAR investment rules; apply for CSSF derogations where justified
Ensure risk-spreading in derivatives/collateral and deployment of SICAR cash into eligible assets; confirm look-through for intermediaries
For retail-marketed funds
Maintain robust governance/documentation to leverage flexibility; reference CSSF's Compilation for concepts
Key Dates
late 2025/early 2026 publications, but no explicit dates are provided.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Formalizes prior informal guidance into binding rules with enhanced flexibility but stricter retail protections and disclosure mandates, requiring immediate document reviews/updates for non-compliant SIFs/SICARs/Part II UCIs to avoid supervisory scrutiny or authorization issues; crit
MDD is projected to grow by just below 4 per cent in 2025. From 2026 to 2028, MDD is forecast to grow at an annual average rate of 2.9 per cent per annum. More positive momentum in MNE investment amid lower uncertainty contrasts with slower pace of growth in domestic sectors and cooling of the labour market as drag from capacity constraints becomes evident. Outlook for slightly higher overall inflation, as underlying services price growth more persistent at a higher rate than pre-pandemic. Th...
Revision and remodelling of the rules to which Luxembourg undertakings governed by the Law of 30 March 1988 on undertakings for collective investment (“UCI”) are subject
AI Analysis
Circular IML 91/75, as amended up to CSSF Circular 25/901, consolidates and modernizes the supervisory framework for Luxembourg Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs, refining rules on diversification, borrowing, risk-spreading, and disclosures while tailoring requirements to investor profiles. It matters because it streamlines fragmented regulations, enhances fund competitiveness, and formalizes CSSF expectations without mandating immediate changes for pre-existing funds, reducing compliance burdens while promoting transparency and flexibility. This update aligns administrative practices with market realities, repealing outdated circulars to eliminate ambiguity.
#
What Changed
Consolidation and Repeals: Repeals CSSF Circulars 02/80, 07/309, 06/241, and Chapters G and I of IML 91/75; renders CSSF 08/356 and Chapter H of IML 91/75 inapplicable to Part II UCIs.
Flexible Diversification Rules: Introduces investor-category-based thresholds (e.g., stricter for retail, looser for sophisticated investors); allows CSSF derogations for SIFs/Part II UCIs with justification; applies look-through for intermediary vehicles; harmonizes ramp-up (up to 12 months for liquid strategies,
What You Need To Do
Review and update offering documents/prospectuses for enhanced transparency on risks, limits, borrowing, liquidity tools (e
Align fund documentation/terminology with CSSF Compilation of key concepts for consistency in filings and communications
Disclose ramp-up/wind-down periods, potential derogations, and life extensions clearly; seek CSSF approval for exemptions where justified
Assess portfolio compliance for new funds/compartments; leverage flexibility for sophisticated investors but maintain robust governance
No immediate changes required for pre-19 Dec 2025 funds, but proactive alignment recommended to avoid future issues
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Not critical as existing funds are grandfathered with no retroactive changes required, but high relevance for new launches or material updates post-19 Dec 2025. It matters for operational efficiency (streamlined rules reduce fragmentation) and investor protection (tailored risks/di
Rules applicable to undertakings for collective investment when they employ certain techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 08/356, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/901, establishes detailed rules for Luxembourg undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), including UCITS and alternative investment funds (AIFs), on the use of techniques and instruments relating to transferable securities and money market instruments, such as securities lending, repo transactions, and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives. It matters because it ensures investor protection, risk management, and market stability by imposing strict eligibility, collateral, and operational requirements, aligning Luxembourg funds with EU standards under UCITS and AIFMD directives. Compliance is critical for Luxembourg-domiciled funds engaging in these activities to avoid regulatory sanctions and operational disruptions.
#
What Changed
The original Circular CSSF 08/356 (2008) transposed UCITS III requirements on eligible techniques like securities lending and repos. The amendment via Circular CSSF 25/901 (issued in 2025) introduces updates to reflect post-Brexit adjustments, enhanced ESG considerations in collateral eligibility, stricter counterparty risk limits for OTC derivatives, and improved transparency in reporting. Key changes include:
Expanded collateral rules: Collateral must now include sustainable assets meeting SFD
What You Need To Do
*Policy Review & Update
*Risk Management Systems
*Counterparty Due Diligence
*Operational Setup
*Reporting & Disclosure
Key Dates
23 December 2008- Original Circular CSSF 08/356 effective date for UCITS III implementation.
21 July 2011- Partial updates for UCITS IV alignment.
22 July 2013- Extension to AIFs under AIFMD transposition.
15 October 2025- Issuance of amending Circular CSSF 25/901.
01 January 2026- Effective date for amendments (e.g., new collateral rules, reporting formats).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate relevance for funds actively using these techniques (common in fixed-income and equity strategies for yield enhancement). Non-compliance risks CSSF fines (up to 5% of NAV), temporary prohibitions on techniques, or fund suspension. With the 01 January 2026 effective date rec
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers, in particular offers to purchase shares and alleged pre-IPO shares, which are purportedly brokered by Ambassador. According to information available to BaFin, Ambassador Management GmbH, supposedly based in Frankfurt am Main, Ambassador Financial Group Ltd. and Ambassador Global Systems LLC are providing financial or investment services without the required authorisation. According to the current state of knowledge, there...
The Artificial Intelligence Consortium (AIC) aims to provide a platform for public-private engagement to further dialogue on the capabilities, development, deployment, use, and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in UK financial services.
Provisional dates for Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) announcements on Bank Rate and publication of MPC meeting minutes and the quarterly Monetary Policy Report.
The Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin has issued warnings regarding offerings found on websites maxfuledge(.)com and trading-area.maxfuledge-v2(.)com/auth/register. Based on its investigations, the purportedly London or Singapore-based trading platform MaxFulEdge offers unauthorised financial services, securities transactions, and cryptocurrency-related services. The platform promotes its offerings through supposed customer service representatives (maja.weis(at)maxfuledge.team and sophia....
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that financial economist and academic scholar Dr. Joshua T. White will return to the agency beginning the week of Jan. 5, 2026, to serve as its Chief Economist and Director of the Division of…
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Investor Advocate today delivered its Report on Activities for the Fiscal Year 2025 to Congress, highlighting the initiatives and work of the office during the fiscal year.The report includes:An…
The FCA welcomes the Government’s consultation on a new benchmarks regime for the UK. Since the introduction of the current regulatory framework, the financial landscape has evolved significantly. We now have an opportunity to build a regime that is more targeted to current market conditions and to reduce unnecessary burdens on industry, without compromising high standards. We are working with the Government to reform the current benchmarks regime to ensure that the regulatory framework remai...
AI Analysis
The FCA welcomes HM Treasury's consultation on reforming the UK Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) to create a narrower, risk-based **Specified Authorised Benchmarks Regime (SABR)**, reducing regulatory scope by 80-90% to target only systemically important benchmarks and administrators while easing burdens on industry. This matters for compliance professionals as it shifts from broad regulation of all benchmarks to targeted oversight, requiring firms to reassess benchmark usage, prepare for transition, and adapt to FCA rules on risk management, enhancing UK competitiveness post-FSMA 2023 repeal of assimilated laws.
#
What Changed
Narrower scope: Regulation limited to benchmarks/administrators designated by HM Treasury (HMT) on FCA advice, based on criteria like systemic impact on UK financial integrity, consumers, or markets; reduces coverage by 80-90%, with no distinction between critical/significant/other types or benchmark categories (e.g., interest rate, commodity).
FCA-led firm-facing rules: HMT delegates requirements (governance, conflicts, oversight, methodology transparency, record-keeping) to FCA Handbook; remov
What You Need To Do
Review current benchmarks for potential designation risk (systemic impact criteria) and map usage across portfolios
Participate in HMT consultation (responses via gov
Develop/revise policies for benchmark risk management, including cessation/wind-down plans for regulated/non-regulated benchmarks per future FCA guidance
Assess transition from current authorisation (if non-designated, prepare for deregistration); overseas firms evaluate ORR eligibility
Update governance/conflicts frameworks for any designated activities; monitor ESG data inclusion in rules
Key Dates
17 December 2025- HM Treasury publishes consultation on benchmarks regime reform.
1 January 2026- Reforms take initial effect; UK becomes only jurisdiction regulating all local benchmarks pre-reform; EU BMR reforms effective, highlighting UK divergence.
Due course 2026- FCA consults on regulatory requirements for designated administrators/users.
2026- FCA expected to publish updated guidance on critical benchmarks and implement SABR refinements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Significant scope reduction eases burdens but introduces transition risks, new FCA rules, and designation uncertainty; firms must act now on consultation (post-Dec 2025) and prep for 2026 FCA changes to avoid non-compliance during shift, especially with 1 Jan 2026 milestone amplifyin
ESMA reviews impact of Guidelines on ESG or sustainability related terms in fund names 17 December 2025 Risk monitoring Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial market regulator and supervisor, released research today assessing the impact of its fund naming guidelines on ESG and sustainability-related terms. The study found that ESMA’s Guidelines have: Improved consistency in the use of ESG terms by increasing alignment of fund names and the...
amending Circular CSSF 22/811.Authorisation and organisation of entities acting as UCI administrators.
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/900, issued on 16 December 2025, amends Circular CSSF 22/811 to clarify governance principles, authorisation requirements, and operational standards for UCI (Undertakings for Collective Investment) administrators in Luxembourg, while reforming annual reporting obligations. It matters because it strengthens supervisory oversight, aligns with DORA for ICT outsourcing, and simplifies reporting to enhance efficiency and compliance in the fund administration sector.
#
What Changed
Repeals Annex B of Circular CSSF 22/811 with immediate effect, replacing it with streamlined annual reporting via a core compliance-focused Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) that assesses governance, internal controls, operational organization, and risk management; detailed instructions are now on the CSSF website.
Introduces prior CSSF authorisation requirements for entities acting as UCI administrators, including a defined administrative procedure with application details in Annex A; authori
What You Need To Do
Assess eligibility and obtain prior CSSF authorisation via Annex A application (or notify substantial changes); ensure ongoing validity by monitoring operational model and delegations
Adapt internal processes for revised annual UCIA reporting (SAQ-focused, integrated where applicable); submit using CSSF website instructions starting for FY ending 31 Dec 2025
Review/update contracts with UCIs/IFMs to define roles, responsibilities, and oversight; implement delegation monitoring, remediation plans, and ICT compliance (DORA/Circular 25/882 or 20/750)
For DORA-scope entities, align outsourcing arrangements with Circular CSSF 25/882
Key Dates
16 December 2025- Issuance date; repeal of Annex B of Circular CSSF 22/811 effective immediately.
January 2025- DORA entry into force, applying to ICT outsourcing for in-scope UCIAs.
31 December 2025- New reporting framework (SAQ and updated modalities) applies to all financial years ending on or after this date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate repeal of prior reporting Annex requires prompt process updates; new framework applies to FY 2025 year-ends (just past as of Jan 2026), risking supervisory scrutiny or penalties for non-compliance; DORA alignment adds operational resilience pressure amid ongoing CSSF focus
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its former director a total of €500,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Novaxia Investissement €400,000 and its former director Joachim Azan €100,000 on 10 December 2025 for breaches of professional obligations, primarily due to an incomplete and non-operational investment/divestment procedure lacking traceability of compliance checks and formalized due diligence. This enforcement action underscores AMF's focus on robust operational procedures in asset management, serving as a deterrent and educational tool for ensuring honest, fair, and diligent business conduct. Compliance teams should prioritize procedure operationalization to avoid similar sanctions, as this fits a pattern of recent AMF fines targeting procedural deficiencies.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing requirements under AMF professional obligations for asset managers (sociétés de gestion), including:
Fully operational investment and divestment procedures that ensure traceability of compliance checks against fund policies and constraints.
Formalized due diligence prior to allocating investment projects to funds.
No explicit changes to rules; instead, it clarifies enforcement expectations for procedure completenes
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance investment/divestment procedures: Ensure completeness, traceability of all compliance checks (e
Document all processes rigorously
Conduct gap analysis against AMF expectations
Senior manager training
Appeal monitoring
Key Dates
10 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines; appeals possible (no specific deadline stated, but typically within 2 months to Conseil d’État).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This decision, part of a 2025 enforcement wave fining asset managers €400k–€1.3m for procedural lapses (e.g., non-operational investment processes, inadequate due diligence), signals intensified AMF scrutiny on operational integrity. Firms risk personal fines for managers and reputat
On 16 December 2025, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA launched the consultation on the partially revised Circular 2016/7 “Video and online identification”. The consultation will go on until 27 February 2026.
Authorisation and organisation of entities acting as UCI administrators
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 22/811, as amended by Circular CSSF 25/900, establishes CSSF requirements for the authorisation, governance, internal organisation, and oversight of entities acting as UCI (Undertakings for Collective Investment) administrators in Luxembourg. It matters because it standardises practices amid regulatory, technological, and market evolutions, ensuring robust controls, risk management, and supervision for fund administration activities critical to Luxembourg's fund industry.
#
What Changed
Authorisation Requirements: Prior CSSF authorisation is mandatory for appointment as UCI administrator, via full application under sectoral laws or a simplified administrative procedure; application must include details per Annex A, with ongoing updates for substantial changes.
Scope of UCI Administration: Defines three core functions—registrar, NAV calculation/accounting, and client communication—requiring only one designated service provider per function per UCI (or compartment); UCI/IFM may p
What You Need To Do
Submit authorisation application to CSSF with Annex A information before commencing UCI administration; notify substantial changes and keep file updated
Establish/implement governance, controls, escalation processes, resource adequacy, ICT/business continuity per circular; ensure single provider per function
For delegations
Conclude written contracts with UCI/IFM; submit annual UCIA activity reports
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Non-compliance risks CSSF sanctions, as authorisation is prior and ongoing; critical for Luxembourg fund ecosystem given evolutions in tech/markets/DORA. Firms must act promptly if unauthorised or misaligned, especially with annual reporting since 2023 and DORA integration; impacts o
Earlier this year, we undertook a refresh of our Sustainable Finance Advisory Committee. In line with good governance, we planned to refresh the membership on a staggered basis, allowing us to bring in new expertise whilst benefiting from some continuity. Following this process, we are pleased to announce the appointment of two new members to the Committee:Elly Dowding, Director of ESG AccordFarnam Bidgoli, Independent AdviserThese appointments reflect our commitment to drawing on diverse exp...
An update on our investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP. On 4 May 2021, we announced that we had opened an investigation into the oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited, an appointed representative, by its principal, Mirabella Advisors LLP. Our investigation reviewed the nature, conduct and scope of Mirabella’s business. We did not identify breaches by Mirabella that require further action. The investigation has therefore now closed. Mirabella applied to have its authorisation c...
AI Analysis
The FCA has closed its investigation into Mirabella Advisors LLP's oversight of its appointed representative (AR), Greensill Capital Securities Limited, finding no breaches warranting further action. This closure, announced after reviewing Mirabella's business nature, conduct, and scope, signals effective AR oversight in this high-profile case tied to the Greensill collapse, while Mirabella voluntarily cancelled its authorisation effective 12 September 2025. It matters for compliance professionals as it reinforces FCA expectations on principal-AR relationships without imposing new penalties or rules, but underscores ongoing scrutiny in trade finance and supply chain finance sectors.
#
What Changed
There are no new regulatory changes, requirements, or rules introduced by this publication. The statement solely announces the closure of an existing investigation with no identified breaches by Mirabella, maintaining the status quo on AR oversight obligations under FCA rules such as SUP 12 (Appointed Representatives). The FCA reserves the right to reopen if new information emerges, but no policy shifts or guidance updates are provided.
#
Key Dates
4 May 2021- FCA announced opening of investigation into Mirabella's oversight of Greensill Capital Securities Limited as AR.
12 September 2025- Mirabella's authorisation cancelled; firm no longer provides financial services.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a positive closure with no findings of misconduct, new rules, or enforcement, reducing immediate compliance burdens. It matters indirectly by exemplifying robust AR oversight meeting FCA standards amid Greensill fallout, offering reassurance for similar firms while signaling c
Governance Annual report Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF examines the transparency of executive succession plans as part of its 2025 Corporate Governance Report
Der Bundesrat hat die Sanktionslisten betreffend Russland und Belarus am 12. Dezember 2025 ausgeweitet. Die Schweiz übernimmt damit diverse Änderungen, welche die EU im Rahmen ihres 19. Sanktionspakets beschlossen hat.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Council expanded sanctions lists against Russia and Belarus on December 12, 2025, adopting changes from the EU's 19th sanctions package to align Swiss measures with EU restrictions. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate asset freezes, transaction bans, and reporting obligations on newly listed entities, strengthening efforts to counter Russia's military-industrial complex and shadow oil fleet while preventing sanctions evasion.
#
What Changed
Asset freezes and prohibitions: 22 natural persons and 42 companies/organizations added to asset freeze and prohibition on making funds/assets available lists.
Shipping restrictions: 116 new vessels (primarily Russian shadow fleet tankers evading oil price caps) subjected to comprehensive purchase, sale, and service bans.
Export controls: 45 new companies (including in third countries) under stricter export controls to block deliveries of critical goods to Russia's military-industrial sector.
Fi
What You Need To Do
Immediate screening
Asset freezing
Transaction halts
Ongoing monitoring
Key Dates
13 December 2025- Measures enter into force; immediate implementation required.DEADLINE
29 October 2025- Prior expansion decision (related 18th EU package adoption).
30 October 2025- Entry into force of October measures (export restrictions, RDIF transaction bans).
31 December 2025- Extension of certain derogations (e.g., Russia investment withdrawals).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical - Effective immediately (13 Dec 2025), with no grace period for asset freezes/transaction bans, exposing non-compliant firms to severe penalties amid FINMA's active enforcement on sanctions (type: enforcement). This escalates existing Russia/Belarus regimes, targeting evasion vecto
We're providing guidance to support firms to tackle bullying, harassment and violence in financial services, after they asked for additional support. In July, we changed our rules – setting clearer standards for how financial services firms should address non-financial misconduct.This more closely aligned the rules for banks and non-banks. We wanted to give firms the confidence to act against serious misconduct, drive consistency and make it clearer when non-financial misconduct is a breach o...
MiCA Crypto-assets Financial products Marketing Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF adapts its policy on complex financial products in response to the rise of crypto-assets
Given at the 20th High-level meeting on financial stability and regulatory and supervisory priorities (jointly organised by the Arab Monetary Fund, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Institute of the Bank of International Settlements).
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 7. August 1990 über Wirtschaftsmassnahmen gegenüber der Republik Irak (SR 946.206) publiziert.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces a SECO update to the annex of the Ordinance on Economic Measures against the Republic of Iraq (SR 946.206), reflecting UN Sanctions Committee amendments to the list of sanctioned individuals, companies, and organizations made on December 9, 2025. It matters because these changes are directly applicable in Switzerland, requiring financial intermediaries to immediately block affected assets and report business relationships to SECO to ensure compliance with UN sanctions. Failure to act risks enforcement by FINMA under its supervisory mandate.
#
What Changed
The UN Sanctions Committee modified the sanctions list targeting persons, companies, and organizations related to Iraq on December 9, 2025; this amendment was published by SECO on its website and integrated into the SESAM sanctions database on December 10, 2025.
Switzerland automatically applies UN sanctions lists without delay per the Federal Council's Ordinance of March 4, 2016, making the update immediately binding.
Financial intermediaries must implement prohibitions, freeze assets of newly
What You Need To Do
Screen against SESAM database
Asset freeze
Report to SECO
Internal review
Document compliance
Key Dates
December 9, 2025- UN Sanctions Committee decision amending the Iraq sanctions list.
December 10, 2025- SECO publishes update on its website and updates SESAM database; changes enter into force immediately in Switzerland.
Immediate (as of December 10, 2025)- Financial intermediaries must block assets and report to SECO without delay, per automatic application of UN sanctions.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Automatic and immediate effect heightens breach risk, with FINMA enforcement powers including fines, reputational damage, or license revocation for non-compliance. It matters due to Switzerland's direct implementation of UN sanctions, amplifying AML/financial crime exposure amid ongo
Good evening. Thank you for the invitation to join you today. This evening I want to talk about economic resilience, what it is and whether we have enough of it. I spoke about economic resilience in my first speech as Governor – 6 years ago – and wrote to the Minister for Finance about it in early February this year. After everything that’s happened since February, it feels timely to take stock of where we are. My conclusion is that we need to give it greater focus. Let me start by setting ou...
New report outlines the Central Bank’s approach to more effective and efficient regulatory and supervisory framework, reducing complexity and improving clarity while maintaining resilience and important protections in the system. This work builds on the Central Bank’s strategy to transform regulation and supervision, including the introduction of our new integrated supervisory approach and the improvements made in our gatekeeping processes in recent years. The roadmap sets out a comprehensive...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland published a comprehensive multi-year roadmap on December 10, 2025, aimed at streamlining its regulatory and supervisory framework across four pillars: supervision, regulation, gatekeeping, and reporting. This initiative represents a strategic shift toward more effective and efficient oversight while explicitly maintaining resilience standards and consumer protections, responding to EU calls for regulatory reform to enhance competitiveness.
What Changed
The roadmap encompasses four major reform areas:
*Supervision: Implementation of a new integrated, risk-based supervisory approach** introduced in January 2025, consolidating multidisciplinary teams and sharpening risk focus with clearer supervisory communications. This delivers more coherent firm engagement, stronger proportionality, and streamlined processes.
*Regulation: Comprehensive updates to the domestic rulebook, including:
Insurance: Major compatibility review to eliminate duplication
What You Need To Do
*Immediate actions for compliance professionals
*Monitor consultation releases
*Assess rulebook changes
*Evaluate supervisory engagement
*Prepare for gatekeeping changes
Key Dates
January 2025- New integrated supervisory model became effective
2026- Public consultation on new Regulatory Impact Assessment Framework
2026 to first half of 2028- Multi-year programme implementation period for all roadmap initiatives
2025- Strategic review of Industry Funding Levy approach (consultation expected during 2025)
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Lori J. Schock, who has served as the Director of the Office of Investor Education and Assistance (OIEA) since 2009, will retire from the agency at the end of December.“I have known Lori for…
In line with the Bank's transition to a repo-led, demand-driven operational framework for providing reserves, the Bank is today announcing a reduction in the spread to Bank Rate of the Operational Standing Facility (OSF). This Market Notice confirms the new, recalibrated spread of the OSF at Bank Rate +15bps for the lending facility and Bank Rate -15bps for the deposit facility. As with all SMF facilities, the OSFs are 'open for business' and should be used by SMF participants for the purpose...
Good morning and welcome everyone. I am delighted to address the eighth meeting of this Forum. When the Forum was established three years ago, the goal was to bring together participants from across Ireland to build a shared approach to understanding and managing the systemic risks that climate change poses, while supporting the orderly transition of households and businesses to the net zero objective that we’re all familiar with. The Forum has come a long way in those three years. We have es...
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force has announced the agenda and panelists for its rescheduled Roundtable on Financial Surveillance and Privacy.“New technologies give us a fresh opportunity to recalibrate financial surveillance…
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold the second in its series of compliance outreach events regarding the 2024 adoption of amendments to Regulation S-P. The event, for transfer agents, is a webinar scheduled for December 17…
A raft of new measures designed to support the growth of the mutuals sector have been announced today by the financial regulators. They include a review of credit union regulations and the launch of a Mutual Societies Development Unit by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
This report has been informed by the PRA and FCA’s ongoing regulation and supervision of mutuals and by direct engagement with mutuals and their trade associations in sessions around the country throughout 2025.
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Journalists Listed companies and issuers The Autorité des Marchés Financiers takes note of the Cour de Cassation ruling in the Vivendi SE case
The Bank of England (the Bank) has today launched its second system-wide exploratory scenario (SWES) exercise. This will focus on how the private markets ecosystem operates under stress and the potential implications for UK financial stability and the UK real economy.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Board of Directors of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA has extended Beat Fellmann’s term of office by one year until the end of 2026.
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
#
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-cent
What You Need To Do
Assess cross-border transactions
Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025HMT deems approval of PRA’s instrument.
24 September 2025HMT deems approval of FCA’s instrument.
27 November 2025Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary eq
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is today publishing its ex-post evaluation report on the requirements for interest rate risk management in the banking book. The evaluation has shown that the supervisory practice has essentially been successful and that the objectives have been achieved. Specific improvements will be made as part of a partial revision of Circular 2019/2, which is planned from 2026. The interest rate shock scenarios updated by the Basel Committee on Banki...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Cristina Martin Firvida, who has served as the Director of the Office of the Investor Advocate since January 2023, will conclude her tenure with the agency at the end of January 2026. As…
The CFTC filed a civil enforcement action on November 21, 2025, against Brian Mitchell, Kevin Mack Jr., and their unregistered entity Young Pros Investment Group LLC (YPIG) for fraudulently soliciting ~$1 million from 33 pool participants to trade commodity futures, using misrepresentations, Ponzi payments, false statements, and registration violations, including Mitchell's breach of a prior 2021 CFTC order. This case underscores the CFTC's aggressive enforcement against unregistered commodity pools and fraud, seeking restitution, disgorgement, penalties, trading bans, and injunctions under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). Compliance teams must prioritize registration checks and fraud prevention to avoid similar actions, as it highlights personal liability for controlling persons.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reinforces longstanding CEA and CFTC rules on:
Mandatory registration as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and Associated Persons (APs) for pools trading commodity futures (CFTC Regulation 4.13 exemptions do not apply here due to fraud and public solicitation).
Prohibitions on fraud, misrepresentations, guarantees of profit, non-disclosure of risks, commingling funds, and operating pools as
What You Need To Do
Verify registration
Implement controls
Conduct due diligence
Train staff
For SEC-registered advisers
Key Dates
2025.
November 21, 2025- CFTC files complaint in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.
~December 2020 - May 2022- Alleged fraudulent solicitation and trading period.
2021- Prior CFTC administrative order against Mitchell (Press Release 8427-21) prohibiting trading and registration activities for three years.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This action signals intensified CFTC scrutiny on unregistered pools amid rising crypto/futures fraud (e.g., similar January 2026 case against Wolf Capital). It matters because penalties include personal bans, multimillion restitution/disgorgement, and whistleblower awards (10-30% of
The CFTC today announced the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California entered a final judgement against Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Ikahn (aka Jeffrey Santulan and Jeffrey Hill) ordering them to pay $25.6 million in restitution to victims and a $25.6 million civil monetary penalty for operating a nationwide, precious metals fraud. Released: 11/20/2025
AI Analysis
The CFTC, alongside 30 state regulators, secured a final judgment on November 20, 2025, against Safeguard Metals LLC and Jeffrey Ikahn, imposing $25.6 million in restitution to victims and a $25.6 million civil monetary penalty for a nationwide precious metals fraud scheme from October 2017 to July 2021 that defrauded over 450 elderly investors of more than $52 million. This enforcement action, resolving a February 2022 complaint, highlights coordinated federal-state-SEC efforts to combat commodity fraud and underscores personal liability for controlling persons under CEA Section 6(c)(1) and Regulation 180.1(a). It matters for compliance as it reinforces aggressive penalties for misrepresentations, overcharges, and targeting vulnerable populations, with offsets across parallel SEC proceedings.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reaffirms existing CEA prohibitions on fraud, including Section 6(c)(1), 7 U.S.C. § 9(1), and 17 C.F.R. § 180.1(a)(1)-(3), covering material misrepresentations, omissions, and deceptive schemes in precious metals sales. Key takeaways include joint-and-several liability for entities and controlling individuals (Ikahn held liable for not acting in good faith), systematic overcharges as fraud
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate fraud risk assessments on precious metals sales scripts, disclosures, and pricing markups to ensure no material misrepresentations or undisclosed overcharges
Enhance senior investor protections, including suitability reviews, cooling-off periods, and training on vulnerable customer targeting bans
Review controlling person policies for good faith oversight, documenting supervisory failures to avoid personal liability
Audit parallel SEC/CFTC exposures in commodity-linked activities, preparing for offset calculations in multi-agency actions
Update compliance manuals with this case as precedent for CEA fraud in physical commodities; monitor whistleblower notices for internal reporting incentives
Key Dates
February 1, 2022- CFTC and states file initial complaint alleging fraud scheme.
May 5, 2022- Plaintiffs file First Amended Complaint.
September 6, 2023- Second Amended Complaint filed.
May 2, 2025- Court enters SEC remedies judgment ($25.6M disgorgement/penalty, with offsets).
September 30, 2025- Court issues Statement of Decision granting restitution ($25.6M) and civil penalty ($25.6M).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This resolved enforcement sets precedent for precious metals fraud penalties but imposes no new rules or immediate deadlines beyond whistleblower claims (March 9, 2026). It matters due to escalating CFTC-state coordination, personal liability risks, and focus on elder fraud amid ri
The Federal Council has appointed Katia Villard to the Board of Directors of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA. A professor of criminal law, Ms Villard will succeed Ursula Cassani Bossy who is stepping down from FINMA's Board of Directors at the end of the year.
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Examinations today released its 2026 examination priorities. The Division publishes its annual examination priorities to provide transparency to registrants and investors about the topics that the…
In its new 2025 Risk Monitor, FINMA reveals where it sees the greatest risks for the Swiss financial centre. It warns of an increase in geopolitical and technological risks and calls for more robust controls over the outsourcing of critical functions. The climate risk report is also part of the Risk Monitor for the first time.
Sustainable Finance MIFID Investment advice Long term investment Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The ACPR and the AMF present their joint approach helping...
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
Sanctions & settlements Anti-money Laundering Governance Investment advice Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its two directors a total of €2.5...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined financial investment advisor Carat GP €300,000 and its directors Jimmy Guinet (€200,000) and Sébastien Renaud (€2 million) a total of €2.5 million on 5 November 2025, imposing permanent bans on Carat GP and Renaud, and a 10-year ban on Guinet, for breaches including inadequate documentation, failure to act honestly and professionally in clients' interests, AML failures, lack of conflict detection systems, and insufficient cooperation with inspectors. This decision marks the first time the Committee held directors personally liable for breaches, signaling heightened personal accountability for senior managers in French investment firms. It matters as it reinforces AMF's focus on governance, AML, and client protection, with severe sanctions serving as a deterrent amid rising enforcement trends.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change, but it clarifies and strengthens application of existing AMF rules for conseillers en investissements financiers (CIFs) under French regulations:
Mandatory compliant documentation (e.g., investment proposals).
Obligation to act honestly, fairly, and professionally in clients' best interests, including systems to prevent managers exploiting positions for undocumented investments.
AML/CFT compliance, including prohibitions on directors receiv
What You Need To Do
Audit documentation
Strengthen governance
Enhance AML/CFT
Improve inspection readiness
Senior manager reviews
Key Dates
5 November 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines and bans.
6 November 2025- French version of press release published.
1 January 2019 to 30 June 2024- Relevant period of breaches for Carat GP.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Recent (November 2025) decision with record €2.5m fines and novel personal director liability elevates risks for CIFs and managers, amid AMF's pattern of escalating sanctions on governance/AML failures (e.g., similar cases in 2019-2025). Firms must act promptly to avoid parallel enfo
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bank’s administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
Long term investment Savings protection Investing wisely Retail investors Journalists The Autorité des Marchés Financiers is running a new financial education campaign aimed at young investors
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Long Form ReportPractical rules concerning the self-assessment questionnaire to be submitted by institutionsMission and related reports of the statutory auditors (réviseurs d’entreprises agréés)
AI Analysis
**Circular CSSF 22/821** (as amended) fundamentally restructures how Luxembourg credit institutions report to the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) by replacing the traditional Long Form Report with a digital **self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ)**, complemented by auditor-prepared reports. This shift represents a significant operational change that requires institutions to directly participate in prudential self-assessment while maintaining robust external audit oversight, making it essential for compliance and operational teams to understand new submission requirements and digital workflows.
What Changed
The circular introduces a three-component reporting framework that fundamentally alters the compliance landscape:
Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ): A digital, annually-completed questionnaire that institutions must prepare directly, covering domains within CSSF and ECB prudential supervision competence
Agreed Upon Procedures (AUP) Reports: Reports prepared by approved statutory auditors (réviseurs d'entreprises agréés) on specific compliance areas
Separate REA Report on Financial Instruments
What You Need To Do
*For Credit Institutions
*Establish SAQ Governance
*Data Preparation
*Digital System Access
*Module Completion
Key Dates
25 October 2022- Circular CSSF 22/821 issued
31 December 2022- Circular enters into application
Three months before financial year closure- SAQ becomes accessible through CSSF digital solution
Three months after financial year closure- Deadline for SAQ submission to CSSFDEADLINE
Five months after financial year closure- Deadline for REA reports submissionDEADLINE
Update of Circular CSSF 07/325 on Provisions relating to credit institutions and investment firms of EU origin established in Luxembourg by way of branches or exercising activities in Luxembourg by way of free provision of services, as amended by Circulars CSSF 21/765 and CSSF 22/827
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 25/898 updates Luxembourg's supervisory framework for EU-origin credit institutions and investment firms operating in Luxembourg through branches or free provision of services. This amendment enhances the self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) used by the CSSF to align supervisory oversight with current regulatory priorities, particularly adding UCI administration as a new thematic module. The update reflects the CSSF's evolving supervisory focus and requires affected institutions to demonstrate compliance with expanded assessment criteria.
What Changed
The circular introduces the following material modifications to Circular CSSF 07/325:
*New Supervisory Module
UCI administration** has been added as a thematic module to the self-assessment questionnaire, reflecting increased regulatory attention to fund administration practices.
*Enhanced Self-Assessment Framework**
Existing modules have been updated to better align with supervisory objectives and current regulatory priorities.
The revised SAQ now captures a broader range of supervisory point
What You Need To Do
*Update Self-Assessment Processes
Revise internal SAQ completion procedures to address the new UCI administration module
Ensure all thematic modules reflect current supervisory expectations
*Assess UCI Administration Compliance
If the institution provides or is involved in UCI administration services, conduct a detailed assessment of compliance with CSSF expectations
Key Dates
31 October 2025- Circular CSSF 25/898 published by the CSSF
19 December 2025- Related modernization framework (Circular CSSF 25/901) entered into force for Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs
No specific implementation deadline stated- Institutions should align their SAQ responses and compliance documentation with the updated framework immediately upon publicationDEADLINE
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
Warning Warning Savings protection The AMF warns the public against fraudulent communications offering investment services impersonating Financière du Nogentais
Europe & international Sanctions & settlements Publication of the annual ESMA Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024: AMF imposes the highest amounts in Europe
AI Analysis
The ESMA Annual Report on Sanctions and Measures for 2024, published on 16 October 2025, aggregates enforcement data from EEA national competent authorities (NCAs), highlighting that the French AMF imposed the highest total sanctions at €29.4 million—nearly a third of the EEA's €100 million aggregate—primarily under MAR and MiFID II. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensified enforcement focus on market abuse and investor protection across Europe, with France leading in both fine amounts and settlement usage, underscoring a trend toward higher penalties and agile resolution mechanisms.
#
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but a retrospective report documenting 2024 enforcement trends; no direct regulatory changes are introduced. Key observations include a significant rise in total fine amounts to over €100 million (from €71 million in 2023) despite stable sanction volumes (975 vs. 976), with MAR (377 sanctions, €45.5 million) and MiFID II/MiFIR (294 sanctions, €44.5 million) dominating. Notable shifts: increased settlement usage (94 agreements for €21.9 million, 22% of total), with AM
What You Need To Do
sanction areas
Key Dates
16 October 2025- ESMA publishes second consolidated Annual Sanctions Report for 2024 data.
covering 2024activities.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: medium – This report reinforces existing rules without new requirements, but signals escalating financial penalties (up 40% YoY) and settlement trends, pressuring firms to prioritize MAR/MiFID compliance to avoid outsized AMF-style fines, especially in France or cross-EEA operations. Matter
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF, under which SECO operates) has published an update to the Annex of the Ordinance of 16 December 2022 on measures concerning Haiti, reflecting UN Security Council amendments to the sanctions list. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it triggers immediate asset freeze checks and reporting obligations to ensure compliance with Switzerland's implementation of UN sanctions via FINMA and SECO oversight, avoiding enforcement risks amid Haiti's ongoing instability. The update aligns with global renewals of Haiti sanctions, emphasizing asset freezes on newly designated individuals and entities involved in destabilizing activities.
#
What Changed
Amendment to the Annex of the Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti, incorporating UN Security Council updates to the sanctions list, likely adding individuals, companies, or organizations subject to asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargo expansions.
Reflects broader UN measures, including renewal of travel bans, asset freezes, and arms embargoes; expansion of arms embargo scope to military goods, technology, technical assistance, financial services, and brokeri
What You Need To Do
Screening and Freezing
Ongoing Monitoring
Licensing Checks
Documentation
Key Dates
Immediate (publication date: 21 October 2025)- Swiss firms must check accounts, freeze assets or economic resources of newly listed persons without prior notice, and report to SECO/FINMA without delay.DEADLINE
18 October 2024- UN Security Council Resolution 2752 adopted, expanding arms embargo (basis for Swiss/UK updates).
17-20 October 2025- UNSC renews regime for one year, adds 2 entries to sanctions list (UK/Jersey notices align with Swiss publication).
23 July 2025- UK Haiti Sanctions Amendment Regulations enter force, reflecting similar UN changes.
20 March 2025- Canadian amendments add 3 individuals (related context).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting requirements carry criminal penalties for non-compliance (e.g., aligned with UK fines up to updated monetary levels); failure risks FINMA enforcement, reputational damage, and misalignment with UN obligations amid Haiti's volatile security. Matter
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 24. Juni 2020 über Massnahmen gegenüber Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF/EAER) amended the annex of the Ordinance on Measures against Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5) on 20 October 2025, modifying entries for two individuals, with measures entering into force immediately thereafter. This update requires Swiss financial intermediaries to promptly screen and adjust sanctions compliance programs to reflect the revised designations, ensuring no prohibited dealings with the updated list. It matters because failure to implement could trigger FINMA enforcement, asset blocking obligations, and reporting requirements under Switzerland's Embargo Act (EmbG).
#
What Changed
Modification of entries for two individuals in the annex of the Ordinance on Measures against Nicaragua (SR 946.231.158.5), likely involving updates to personal details, aliases, or sanction rationales.
These changes align with ongoing maintenance of the sanctions list, originally imposed in June 2020 due to human rights, democracy, and rule-of-law concerns in Nicaragua, mirroring EU measures from 2019-2020.
No broader structural changes to the ordinance itself; this is a targeted annex update,
What You Need To Do
Immediate screening
Block and report
Update compliance systems
Monitor ongoing
Document implementation to demonstrate due diligence in case of FINMA audits
Key Dates
20 October 2025- Amendment to the annex published by WBF/EAER.
21 October 2025, 11:00 pm- Measures enter into force; immediate blocking and screening obligations apply.
21 October 2025- FINMA publishes updated sanctions notice and notifies via MyFINMA.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate effect from 21 October 2025 demands swift action to avoid violations, as asset freezing is retroactive and non-compliance risks FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, license restrictions). This matters amid frequent 2025 sanctions updates (e.g., 10+ Nicaragua/Myanmar deltas), hei
Am 20. Oktober 2025 hat das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF die Liste der in diesem Kontext sanktionierten Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen geändert. Das WBF hat die für die Schweiz massgebliche Sanktionsdatenbank SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) angepasst und die Anpassung auf seiner Internetseite dringlich veröffentlicht. Die Änderung tritt am 21. Oktober 2025 23:00 Uhr in Kraft. Die Finanzintermediäre werden gemäss den Vorschriften der Verordnu...
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication notifies Swiss financial intermediaries of updates to the Swiss sanctions list against the Islamic Republic of Iran, as amended by the Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) on October 20, 2025, via the SESAM sanctions database. It matters because financial firms must immediately screen clients, freeze assets, and report matches to comply with Swiss sanction ordinances, amid escalating global Iran sanctions following UN snapback mechanisms. Failure to act risks enforcement by FINMA or SECO.
#
What Changed
The core change is the WBF's amendment to the SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database, updating the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations related to Iran sanctions. This aligns with the Swiss Iran Ordinance and reflects broader international reimposition of UN sanctions via the JCPOA snapback mechanism triggered in late September 2025. No new Swiss-specific requirements are introduced beyond standard implementation of the updated list, but it emphasizes urgent publication a
What You Need To Do
Immediate screening
Asset freeze
Transaction blocks and reporting
Due diligence enhancement
Internal controls
Key Dates
20 October 2025- WBF amends SESAM database and publishes urgent update on its website.
21 October 2025, 23:00 Uhr- Changes enter into force, binding on all Swiss financial intermediaries.
29 September 2025- Triggering UN snapback sanctions on Iran reinstated (contextual lead-in). https://www.mrllp.com/news-item/monthly-sanctions-update-october-2025/
12 December 2025- Swiss Federal Council expands Iran Ordinance, adding humanitarian exceptions and authorization grounds. https://sanctionsnews.bakermckenzie.com/swiss-government-significantly-expands-sanctions-against-iran/
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Effective immediately (post-21 Oct 2025), with today's date (Jan 2026) indicating firms had ~3 months to implement but must verify ongoing compliance amid further expansions (e.g., Dec 2025). Matters due to FINMA's strict enforcement history on sanctions (e.g., independent freezing m
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in the unregulated foreign exchange market (Forex) and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Supervision Asset management Governance Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers publishes the findings of its thematic inspections on governance and role of senior managers at asset management companies
The PRA and FCA have today confirmed plans to increase flexibility around senior banker pay, alongside changes to create better links between bonus awards and responsible risk-taking.
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
#
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from £44,000 variable pay to £660,000 total pay (with variable pay ≤33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferra
What You Need To Do
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
Embed SMR-linked adjustments
For dual-regulated firms
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accoun
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
PS16/25 is the PRA's policy statement restating firm-facing organisational requirements from the MiFID Org Reg (e.g., outsourcing, record-keeping, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance) into the PRA Rulebook, with no material changes, to align with HMT's revocation of the EU regulation under FSMA 2023. This matters because it ensures continuity of prudential oversight for PRA-authorised firms post-revocation, preventing enforcement gaps in systems and controls while adapting provisions (e.g., supervisory function) to UK governance structures.
#
What Changed
Restatement of requirements: Provisions from MiFID Org Reg Articles on outsourcing, record-keeping, control procedures, risk management, compliance, internal audit, and governance are transferred verbatim or with minor clarifications into PRA Rulebook parts (e.g., Risk Control).
Supervisory function adjustment: Following consultation feedback, PRA retained Article 25 provisions but substituted "governing body" for "supervisory function" to fit UK firm structures, preserving board-level oversight
What You Need To Do
Review and map existing MiFID Org Reg compliance processes against restated PRA Rulebook provisions (e
Confirm governing body oversight aligns with adapted Article 25 requirements; document any adjustments for UK structures
Update internal references in algorithmic trading governance documents to new rule 2
Conduct gap analysis and training on minor clarifications; prepare for dual FCA/PRA alignment if applicable
Monitor HMT commencement order; if delayed, reassess implementation plans
Key Dates
9 October 2025- PRA publishes PS16/25 with final rules and feedback to CP9/25 consultation.
23 October 2025- New PRA rules and technical standards come into force, coinciding with HMT's anticipated revocation of MiFID Org Reg via commencement order (FCA rules align on same date).
Prior to 23 October 2025- HMT expected to lay second Statutory Instrument revoking remaining MiFID Org Reg provisions; PRA may delay/revoke rules if not made.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act promptly as rules take effect on 23 October 2025 (past deadline as of current date), with no transition period; non-compliance risks enforcement gaps in core systems/controls post-revocation. Impact is low for substance (restatement only) but requires documentation upd
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA today published guidance on the extension of the transitional period for exchange of collateral in certain OTC derivatives transactions. The current transitional period runs until 1 January 2026 and will be extended by a further three years.
AI Analysis
FINMA extended the transitional period for collateral exchange requirements in non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives from January 1, 2026 to January 1, 2029, providing Swiss market participants with three additional years of relief from mandatory collateral posting obligations on certain equity derivatives. This extension aligns Swiss regulation with the EU's indefinite exemption introduced in December 2024, preventing competitive disadvantages for Swiss derivatives traders while a permanent regulatory framework is developed.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change is the extension of the transitional period under Article 131 paragraph 5bis of the Financial Market Infrastructure Ordinance (FinMIO). Specifically:
Previous deadline: January 1, 2026
New deadline: January 1, 2029
Scope: Applies to non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives transactions involving equity options, index options, and equity basket derivatives that are not cleared through a FINMA-authorized or recognized central counterparty
Regulatory basis: FINMA Guidanc
What You Need To Do
*Acknowledge the extended timeline
*Maintain risk management controls
*Monitor FinMIA revision
*Document compliance rationale
*Assess competitive positioning
Key Dates
October 9, 2025- FINMA Guidance 04/2025 published and takes effect immediately
January 1, 2029- New expiration date for the transitional period; collateral exchange obligations become mandatory unless further extended or a permanent framework is adopted
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement.
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate sustainability reporting: AMF’s response to EFRAG’s consultation on the simplification of European standards
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, responded to EFRAG's July 31, 2025, public consultation on simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming a 57% reduction in mandatory datapoints and 55% shorter standards while urging refinements in materiality, climate reporting, and financial effects disclosure. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming proportionate ESRS revisions that could ease reporting burdens for large listed companies starting voluntarily in 2026, enhancing investor usability without diluting key sustainability insights.
#
What Changed
AMF endorses EFRAG's simplifications but proposes targeted adjustments:
Materiality assessment: Support for proportionate double materiality (impacts, risks, opportunities or IRO) but requires minimum specification of impact type (positive/negative, risk, opportunity); prefers "gross" approach (pre-mitigation) over complex mitigated impacts for investor relevance and consistency.
Climate reporting: Regrets removal of "net zero" definition (90-95% gross GHG reduction trajectory), essential for 20
What You Need To Do
Monitor EFRAG's post-consultation technical advice (end-November 2025) and EC adoption process; prepare for voluntary uptake in 2026 reporting cycles
Listed companies
Conduct or update materiality assessments per EFRAG guidance (e
Prepare xHTML digital tagging for sustainability statements in management reports
French firms
Key Dates
July 31, 2025- EFRAG publishes draft simplified ESRS for public consultation.
September 29, 2025- Consultation closes.
End of November 2025- EFRAG submits technical advice to European Commission.
2026 financial year (reports in 2027)- Voluntary application of simplified standards, if legislative timeline allows.
2027 (reports in 2028)- Full mandatory application targeted.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not immediate mandates, as this is a consultation response with voluntary 2026 start, but proactive preparation is essential for large listed firms facing AMF scrutiny on 2025/2026 statements. Matters due to potential burden reduction (57% fewer datapoints) balanced by AMF's push f
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber Burundi (SR 946.231.121.8) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF/DEFR) has updated the annex to the Ordinance on Measures against Burundi (SR 946.231.121.8), modifying the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations in the SESAM database. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate asset freeze and transaction restrictions, aligning with FINMA's heightened focus on sanctions risks amid geopolitical tensions.
#
What Changed
Modification to the list of sanctioned individuals, enterprises, and organizations under the Burundi sanctions ordinance.
Update published in the SECO Sanctions Management (SESAM) database, which is the authoritative Swiss reference for sanctions compliance.
No details on specific additions, deletions, or alterations to designations are provided in the publication summary, but changes trigger mandatory screening and blocking obligations.
#
What You Need To Do
Screen clients, transactions, and assets against the updated SESAM database immediately upon effectiveness (post-8 October 2025, 23:00)
Freeze assets of newly listed or modified sanctioned parties without prior notice and report to SECO/FINMA via MyFINMA notification system
Cease any direct or indirect provision of funds/economic resources to sanctioned parties; conduct retrospective reviews of existing relationships for Burundi exposure
Update internal sanctions screening tools, policies, and staff training to reflect SESAM changes; document compliance efforts for potential FINMA audits
Key Dates
6 October 2025- DEFR modifies the sanctions list and updates SESAM database.
8 October 2025, 23:00 hours- Changes enter into force; asset freezes and prohibitions apply immediately thereafter.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate effectiveness (8 October 2025) requires swift database rescreening to avoid violations, with FINMA emphasizing sanctions evasion risks in its 2025 Risk Monitor amid geopolitical shifts; non-compliance risks enforcement actions, fines, or reputational damage.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 1 der Verordnung vom 1. Juni 2012 über Massnahmen gegenüber Guinea-Bissau (SR 946.231.138.3) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) published an amendment to Annex 1 of the Ordinance on Measures against Guinea-Bissau (SR 946.231.138.3) on October 7, 2025, updating the sanctions list maintained in the SESAM database. This change, effective October 8, 2025, requires Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately screen clients, freeze assets of listed individuals, and report to SECO, reinforcing compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 2048 (2012) and EU measures following the 2012 military coup. It matters for preventing sanctions evasion and ensuring adherence to Switzerland's Embargogesetz (EmbG), with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement.
#
What Changed
Amendment to Annex 1 of the Ordinance dated June 1, 2012, on measures against Guinea-Bissau, as published by WBF on October 6, 2025, and reflected in FINMA's announcement on October 7, 2025.
Updates to the SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database, which is the authoritative Swiss sanctions list; specific details on additions, deletions, or modifications to listed natural persons (e.g., changes for six individuals noted in related updates) were implemented.
Prohibition on dealings with listed p
What You Need To Do
Screen customer relationships against the updated SESAM list immediately upon effectiveness using heightened due diligence per GwG Art
Freeze assets of any matched listed persons/entities and prohibit new business
Report affected relationships to SECO without delay; conduct additional checks and file SARs with MROS if suspicions remain
Update internal sanctions screening systems and monitor MyFINMA for FINMA notifications
Document compliance actions to demonstrate adherence in audits or FINMA inquiries
Key Dates
October 6, 2025- WBF adjusts SESAM database and publishes changes on its website.
October 7, 2025- FINMA publishes the sanctions notice.
October 8, 2025, 23:00 Uhr- Changes enter into force; immediate implementation required for asset freezes and prohibitions.DEADLINE
prior 2024update had a similar timeline effective October 8, 2024, at 18:00 Uhr, indicating recurring list maintenance.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting are mandatory from October 8, 2025, with violations exposing firms to FINMA fines, reputational damage, or criminal liability under EmbG and GwG. This update underscores ongoing list volatility (e.g., similar 2024 change), demanding robust real-ti
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 7 der Verordnung vom 8. Juni 2012 über Massnahmen gegenüber Syrien (SR 946.231.172.7) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) updated Annex 7 of the Ordinance on Measures against Syria (SR 946.231.172.7) on October 6, 2025, modifying the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations, effective October 8, 2025. This change requires Swiss financial intermediaries to immediately implement asset freezes and report affected relationships to SECO, amid broader Swiss alignment with EU and US easing of Syria sanctions earlier in 2025. It matters for compliance as it mandates swift screening updates to avoid violations of ongoing targeted financial sanctions.
#
What Changed
The WBF amended the list of sanctioned entities in Annex 7 of SR 946.231.172.7, updating the SESAM sanctions database (SECO Sanctions Management).
Financial intermediaries must enforce prohibitions, freeze assets of listed parties, and report business relationships to SECO.
Reporting to SECO does not exempt intermediaries from conducting due diligence under Art. 6 GwG (Anti-Money Laundering Act) and filing suspicions with the Money Laundering Reporting Office under Art. 9 GwG if issues persist.
What You Need To Do
Screen client portfolios, accounts, and transactions against the updated SESAM database immediately upon effectiveness
Freeze assets of newly listed or affected sanctioned parties and implement transaction prohibitions
Report all impacted business relationships to SECO promptly
Conduct GwG due diligence (Art
Update internal sanctions screening systems and train staff on changes; retain evidence of compliance for audits
Key Dates
October 6, 2025- WBF publishes update to Annex 7 and SESAM database.
October 8, 2025 at 23:00- Changes enter into force; asset freezes and prohibitions apply immediately.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze and reporting obligations take effect October 8, 2025, with non-compliance risking FINMA enforcement, fines, or criminal liability under sanctions laws. This matters as it occurs against a backdrop of Syria sanctions easing (e.g., Swiss economic sanctions lifte
Stress-testing Markets Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The Banque de France, the ACPR and the AMF launch a first system-wide stress test on interconnections within the financial system
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Ken Johnson, who has been serving as Chief Operating Officer (COO) since December 2017, will retire from the agency in December. “Ken has been an integral leader at the SEC for more than two…
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its two managers a total of €1.3 million
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Altaroc Partners €600,000 and its senior managers Maurice Tchenio (€500,000) and Patrick de Giovanni (€200,000) a total of €1.3 million on 15 September 2025 for breaches of professional obligations, including non-operational investment procedures, inadequate AML/CFT due diligence, deficient marketing materials, and unproven benefits from fee retrocessions to distributors. This decision underscores the AMF's heightened scrutiny on operational controls and senior accountability in asset management, serving as a critical enforcement signal for firms to strengthen procedures amid a pattern of similar sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new legislation, but it reinforces and clarifies existing professional obligations under AMF regulations for asset managers (sociétés de gestion), particularly under the AIFM regime. Key expectations highlighted include:
Operational investment/divestment procedures: Must be fully implemented, with traceability of checks on lender authorizations and compliance with fund policies.
AML/CFT due diligence: Systematic verification required on fund assets and l
What You Need To Do
Audit procedures immediately
Enhance AML/CFT systems
Validate marketing and fees
Senior manager training
Mock AMF inspections
Key Dates
15 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines on Altaroc Partners, Maurice Tchenio, and Patrick de Giovanni.
16 September 2025- French version of press release published.
Post-15 September 2025 (exact date unspecified)- Appeal lodged by Altaroc Partners, Tchenio, and de Giovanni before the Conseil d’État against decision SAN-2025-09.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This fits a 2025 enforcement trend targeting asset managers' operational deficiencies (e.g., similar fines against Novaxia Investissement on 10 December 2025, M Capital Partners on 31 December 2025, and Eternam on 9 September 2025), signaling AMF's zero-tolerance for non-operational
Warning Identity theft The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning professionals about the extensive fraudulent and malicious use of its name engaging people into running a malicious computer program.
Long term investment Sustainable Finance Retail investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Sustainable finance: retail investors have higher expectations of their financial advisors
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA and the UK Financial Conduct Authority FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority PRA today signed a memorandum of understanding. The memorandum sets out details of the co-operation under the Berne Financial Services Agreement and opens up new cross-border opportunities in insurance and investment services.
Supervision Other professionals Fintech Market Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers European supervision of capital markets: the AMF calls for an enhanced...
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined an asset management company €400,000 on 9 September 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including deficient marketing disclosures, inadequate conflict of interest systems, non-operational valuation procedures, failure to oversee external experts, and deficient AML/CFT systems in managing AIFs and club deals. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's focus on operational robustness and investor protection in asset management, serving as a critical reminder for firms to ensure procedures are not only documented but fully operational and effective. Compliance teams should review this to benchmark internal controls, as it highlights personal accountability for senior managers and recurring AMF priorities in recent sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change introducing new rules; it enforces existing professional obligations under AMF jurisdiction for asset managers. Key requirements reaffirmed include:
Providing comprehensive, accurate, and understandable information to investors on fee retrocessions to distributors in AIF marketing.
Implementing effective systems for preventing and managing conflicts of interest, particularly in joint investments like club deals classified as Other AIFs.
Ma
What You Need To Do
Verify investor disclosures on fee retrocessions are comprehensive and understandable; update marketing materials for AIFs and club deals accordingly
Formalize independent valuer roles and implement monitoring for external experts per activity programs
Enhance AML/CFT due diligence on fund assets/liabilities, including risk mapping and procedure testing
Senior managers
Test procedures via internal audits; remediate deficiencies proactively to mitigate enforcement risk
Key Dates
9 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing €400,000 fine on Eternam for breaches.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This recent (2025) decision aligns with a pattern of AMF fines on asset managers for similar operational and AML failures (e.g., €1.3M on Altaroc Partners for lacking investment procedures and AML due diligence; €200K+ on M Capital for non-operational systems and AML deficiencies). I
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA is transferring the FINMA Banking Insolvency Ordinance, FINMA Insurance Bankruptcy Ordinance and FINMA Collective Investment Schemes Bankruptcy Ordinance to a new consolidated FINMA Insolvency Ordinance. The existing regulations have been revised and adapted where necessary – based on findings from practical experience and academia. In addition, the FINMA Insolvency Ordinance implements the amendments made necessary by the revisions to th...
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 7 der Verordnung vom 11. November 2015 über Massnahmen gegenüber der Islamischen Republik Iran (SR 946.231.143.6) publiziert.
AI Analysis
On August 18, 2025, the Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (WBF) published an updated sanctions notification regarding Iran, specifically modifying Annex 7 of the Ordinance on Measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran (SR 946.231.143.6). This update is critical for Swiss financial institutions and businesses because it reflects the evolving sanctions landscape following the automatic reinstatement of UN Security Council resolutions on Iran's nuclear program in September 2025.
What Changed
The August 2025 notification updated the list of designated persons, entities, and organizations subject to Swiss sanctions against Iran. While the search results do not provide the specific details of individual entries added or removed from Annex 7, this type of notification typically reflects changes to the UN Security Council's consolidated sanctions list that Switzerland is obligated to implement under its Embargo Act (EmbG).
The broader context shows that Switzerland was preparing for sig
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance obligations
*Sanctions List Screening
*Transaction Review
*Account Monitoring
*Policy Updates
Key Dates
August 18, 2025- WBF published updated sanctions notification for Iran (Annex 7 modifications)
August 28, 2025- Germany, France, and UK triggered UN snapback mechanism
September 15, 2025- Harmonization of sanctions ordinances entered into force (affecting financial sanctions procedures across multiple jurisdictions including Iran)
September 27, 2025- UN nuclear-related sanctions against Iran automatically reinstated
September 28, 2025- EU reactivated suspended sanctions related to Iran's proliferation activities
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs 2 der Verordnung vom 12. August 2015 über Massnahmen gegenüber der Republik Südsudan (SR 946.231.169.9) publiziert.
AI Analysis
FINMA has published an update notifying financial intermediaries of changes to Annex 2 of the Ordinance on Measures against the Republic of South Sudan (SR 946.231.169.9), as announced by SECO on August 18, 2025, effective August 20, 2025. This matters because it imposes immediate asset freeze and transaction ban obligations on Swiss financial institutions with exposure to newly or modified sanctioned entities, aligning with UN Security Council Resolution 2206 (2015) and EU measures to address South Sudan's ethnic conflict, human rights violations, and humanitarian crisis. Compliance failure risks enforcement actions under the Embargo Act (EmbG) and AML regulations (GwG).
#
What Changed
SECO amended Annex 2 of the Ordinance, likely adding, removing, or modifying listings of sanctioned persons, companies, or organizations related to South Sudan.
The update requires implementation of prohibitions (e.g., no new business), asset freezing for listed parties, and reporting of affected relationships to SECO.
Changes stem from ongoing enforcement of UN and EU sanctions, with Switzerland implementing via the Embargo Act; Annexes are dynamically updated.
#
What You Need To Do
Screen client portfolios, transactions, and relationships against the updated SESAM database and Annex 2 via FINMA's website or MyFINMA portal
Freeze assets of newly listed parties without delay; block prohibited transactions
Report affected business relationships to SECO promptly; conduct additional GwG Art
Update internal sanctions screening systems and train staff; document compliance for audit trails
Key Dates
18.08.2025- SECO publishes amendment to Annex 2.
19.08.2025- FINMA issues public notification of the update.
20.08.2025- Amendment enters into force; asset freezes and prohibitions apply immediately.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate effect from August 20, 2025, mandates asset freezes and reporting with no grace period, exposing non-compliant firms to FINMA enforcement, fines, or reputational damage under EmbG and GwG. South Sudan sanctions are niche but cumulative updates (e.g., similar to Sudan change
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat den Anhang 2 der Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2005 über Massnahmen gegenüber Sudan (SR 946.231.18) geändert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) has amended Annex 2 of the Ordinance of May 25, 2005, on Measures against Sudan (SR 946.231.18), updating Switzerland's sanctions list in alignment with the SESAM database managed by SECO. This change, effective immediately on a urgent basis, requires Swiss financial intermediaries to implement updated asset freezes and transaction restrictions without delay, heightening compliance risks amid ongoing international sanctions escalation on Sudan-related actors. It matters because non-compliance exposes firms to FINMA enforcement, reputational damage, and penalties under anti-money laundering and sanctions regimes.
#
What Changed
Amendment to Annex 2 of SR 946.231.18, which lists designated persons, entities, and assets subject to sanctions such as asset freezes and prohibitions on making funds or economic resources available.
Updates reflected in the official Swiss sanctions database SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management), published on the SECO website, ensuring harmonized implementation across Switzerland.
Urgent (dringliche) amendment entering into force immediately, bypassing standard consultation periods to address time-
What You Need To Do
Screen against updated SESAM database
Transaction screening and blocking
Internal compliance update
Reporting obligations
Audit and evidence retention
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The urgent effective date mandates immediate action to avoid violations, with FINMA's enforcement history showing fines up to CHF 500,000+ for sanctions breaches. This matters amid Sudan's escalating conflict, where global sanctions (e.g., EU/UK additions in 2025) increase circumvent
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 7. August 1990 über Wirtschaftsmassnahmen gegenüber der Republik Irak (SR 946.206) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) published an updated sanctions notification on August 13, 2025, reflecting modifications to the UN sanctions list targeting Iraq under the Ordinance of August 7, 1990 (SR 946.206). This update is automatically applicable in Switzerland and requires immediate compliance by all financial institutions and regulated entities, as Switzerland implements UN Security Council sanctions lists without delay through its automatic application framework.
What Changed
The UN Sanctions Committee modified the list of sanctioned individuals, companies, and organizations subject to Iraq-related sanctions on August 5, 2025. The specific modifications to the sanctions list were incorporated into Switzerland's SESAM database (SECO Sanctions Management), which serves as the authoritative sanctions reference for Swiss compliance purposes. Under Switzerland's automatic application ordinance adopted by the Federal Council on March 4, 2016, amendments to UN Security Coun
What You Need To Do
*Update screening systems immediately - Integrate the August 5, 2025 modifications into transaction monitoring and customer due diligence systems
*Review existing customer relationships - Screen all current customers, counterparties, and beneficial owners against the updated SESAM database
*Audit transaction history - Identify any transactions processed between August 5-13, 2025 that may have involved newly sanctioned parties
*Document compliance procedures - Maintain records demonstrating implementation of updated sanctions screening
*Train compliance staff - Ensure all relevant personnel understand the updated sanctions list and screening requirements
Key Dates
August 5, 2025- UN Sanctions Committee decision modifying the Iraq sanctions list
August 13, 2025- SECO published the updated sanctions notification and SESAM database modifications
Immediate- Effective date in Switzerland (automatic application upon UN modification)
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung der Anhänge 5, 13, 14 und 15 der Verordnung über Massnahmen gegenüber Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) published updates to Annexes 5, 13, 14, and 15 of the Ordinance on Measures against Belarus (SR 946.231.116.9), aligning Switzerland with additional EU sanctions imposed on July 18, 2025, in response to Belarus's involvement in Russia's war against Ukraine. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it expands asset freezes, reporting obligations, and prohibitions, strengthening sanctions parity with Russia to prevent circumvention and enhance enforcement effectiveness.
#
What Changed
The updates amend Annexes 5, 13, 14, and 15 of SR 946.231.116.9, incorporating EU measures beyond the 18th Russia sanctions package, focusing on goods, financial, and energy sectors. Specific enhancements include expanded lists of sanctioned goods for military/technological strengthening (Annex 3 updated 29.10.2025), high-priority goods (Annex 11a), and industrial strengthening goods (Annex 19). Financial sanctions reinforce asset freezes, prohibitions on providing funds/services to listed parti
What You Need To Do
Screen clients, assets, and transactions against updated Annexes 5, 13-15, and related lists (e
Conduct GwG Art
Cease prohibited activities
Update internal screening tools, policies, and training; monitor SECO/FINMA websites for ongoing Anhänge updates
For trade/energy firms
Key Dates
30 October 2025- New provisions from Bundesrat decision on 29 October 2025 enter into force, requiring immediate implementation of updated Belarus measures.
13 December 2025- Expansions to sanctions lists for Russia/Belarus (including 22 persons, 42 entities, 116 ships, 45 trade firms, 5 banks) take effect.
15 September 2025- Harmonization of financial sanctions across multiple regimes (including Belarus) enters into force, clarifying fund crediting on blocked accounts and reporting.
12 December 2025- Publication of list expansions by WBF/SECO.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate effect from 30 October 2025 demands swift asset screening and reporting to avoid GwG/EmbG violations, with heightened FINMA scrutiny amid Russia-Belarus alignment and recent list expansions (e.g., December 2025). Non-compliance risks enforcement, reputational damage, and sa
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 28. Juni 2023 über Massnahmen betreffend Moldau (SR 946.231.156.5) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) published an update to Annex of the Ordinance on Measures concerning Moldova (SR 946.231.156.5) on August 11, 2025, expanding the sanctions list for Moldova-related destabilizing activities. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it imposes immediate asset freeze and reporting obligations under the Embargo Act (EmbG) and Anti-Money Laundering Act (GwG), aligning Switzerland with EU measures to counter threats to Moldova's sovereignty amid regional instability.
#
What Changed
Updated Sanctions List: The WBF amended the Annex to include additional natural or legal persons, organizations, or entities subject to financial sanctions, effective immediately upon publication.
Financial Sanctions Reinforced: Mandatory asset freezes (sperre von Vermögenswerten), prohibitions on making funds or economic resources available (Bereitstellungsverbote), and reporting requirements to SECO for frozen assets remain core, mirroring EU Regulation 2023/888 updates.
No Change to Core Ordi
What You Need To Do
Screen Client Base
Freeze and Report Assets
AML Due Diligence
Internal Controls
Monitor Ongoing
Key Dates
11.08.2025 - Publication of Annex update by WBF.
12.08.2025 - Measures enter into force(based on similar recent updates; immediate effect standard).
Immediate (unverzüglich) - Report frozen assets to SECO.
28.06.2023 - Original Ordinance effective date(context for baseline measures).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate asset blocking and SECO reporting are mandatory with no grace period, risking FINMA enforcement (e.g., fines, reputational damage) for non-compliance; matters due to expanding geopolitical risks in Eastern Europe, potential for rapid list growth, and overlap with high-volum
Warning Warning Miscellaneous assets Savings protection The AMF is warning the public against several entities proposing to invest in miscellaneous assets without being authorized to do so
On July 31, 2025, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) amended the annex to the Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance (SR 196.127.27), originally enacted March 7, 2025, to update the list of designated individuals subject to comprehensive asset freezes. This amendment reflects Switzerland's ongoing implementation of targeted financial sanctions against politically exposed persons connected to the former Assad regime, requiring immediate compliance from all financial intermediaries and asset holders operating in Swiss jurisdiction.
What Changed
The July 31, 2025 amendment modified the annex (list of designated persons) to the Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance without altering the substantive freezing requirements themselves. The original ordinance, enacted March 7, 2025, froze all assets of 17 designated individuals; the July amendment adjusted this list, though the specific names added or removed are not detailed in the available regulatory notices.
The amendment operates under the Federal Act on the Freezing and Restitution of Illicit
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance steps for financial institutions:
*Update sanctions screening systems to reflect the amended annex list as of July 31, 2025
*Freeze all assets of newly designated individuals without delay, including bank accounts, securities, real estate, and other property of any kind
*File mandatory reports with the Money Laundering Reporting Office (MROS) for all frozen assets under Article 3 of the FIAA
*Conduct enhanced due diligence on existing client relationships to identify any connections to designated persons or their family members, associates, or controlled entities
Key Dates
March 7, 2025, 6:00 PM UTC– Original Syria Asset Freezing Ordinance entered into force
July 31, 2025, 6:00 PM UTC– Amendment to annex (list of designated persons) entered into force
Ongoing– Immediate freezing obligation upon designation; no grace period applies
Four-year validity– The ordinance remains valid for four years from March 7, 2025, unless extended or modified
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in the unregulated foreign exchange market (Forex) and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Disclosure Obligations Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a Danish investment bank for breaches of professional obligations committed by a French branch
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a €300,000 fine on Saxo Bank A/S on 16 July 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations committed through its French branch, including failures to properly inform clients about significant changes to derivatives procedures, margin calculations, and securities transaction incidents, as well as deficiencies in equity savings plan (PEA) transfers. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's active oversight of cross-border investment banks operating in France and highlights critical gaps in client disclosure practices that compliance teams must address.
What Changed
The enforcement decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies existing obligations under current French financial regulations. The key compliance expectations reinforced include:
Client notification requirements for significant procedural changes affecting derivatives trading and margin calculations
Incident disclosure obligations for securities transactions that could materially affect order execution
Timely information provision regarding regulatory consequences
What You Need To Do
*Implement incident reporting protocols for securities transactions that could affect order execution, with documented evidence of timely client notification
*Review PEA transfer procedures to ensure compliance with regulatory timeframes and proper documentation of information provided to clients regarding Brexit-related consequences
*Strengthen information governance to ensure all material operational changes are communicated to clients within required timeframes and with appropriate detail
*Conduct compliance training for front-office and operations staff on professional obligations regarding client communication and information disclosure
Key Dates
16 July 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued imposing €300,000 fine
22 July 2025- Official publication of enforcement decision
No specified deadline- Appeal period available (no specific timeframe stated in the decision)
MAR Financial disclosures & corporate financing Shares The AMF and the AFA call for vigilance of the risk of private corruption by criminal networks of natural persons with access to inside information
Sanctions & settlements MAR professional obligations Investment advice Other professionals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines eight individuals and two legal entities a total of €1,890,000 for late...
Supervision Governance Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on asset management companies' voting and engagement policies
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 16. Dezember 2022 über Massnahmen betreffend Haiti (SR 946.231.139.4) publiziert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) has published an update to Annex 2 of the Ordinance on Measures concerning Haiti (SR 946.231.139.4), dated December 16, 2022, aligning Switzerland's sanctions regime with recent UN Security Council decisions. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it mandates immediate screening against potentially updated lists of designated persons and entities, reinforcing asset freezes, travel bans, and an expanded arms embargo to address Haiti's instability. Non-compliance risks FINMA enforcement actions under anti-money laundering and sanctions frameworks.
#
What Changed
Annex Update: The amendment modifies the annex to the Haiti Ordinance, likely incorporating additions to the UN Sanctions List, such as new designated individuals or entities involved in destabilizing activities like illicit natural resource exploitation, as seen in parallel UN actions (e.g., 2 new entries added on October 17/20, 2025).
Sanctions Renewal and Expansion: Reflects UNSC Resolution 2752 (2024, adopted October 18, 2024) and subsequent renewals (e.g., Resolution 2794 (2025)), renewing
What You Need To Do
Screen Immediately
Cease Prohibited Activities
Report Findings
Update Policies/Systems
License Checks
Key Dates
October 18, 2024 - UNSC Resolution 2752 adoptionExpands arms embargo scope, basis for national implementations.
July 23, 2025 - UK Haiti Sanctions Amendment effectiveParallel indicator of timeline for UN-aligned changes.
October 17/20, 2025 - UNSC Committee adds 2 entries to Sanctions ListTriggers immediate asset freeze checks; Swiss update (SR 946.231.139.4) published in response.
October 21, 2025 - Swiss WBF/VTG announcementConfirms amended sanctioned list.
Immediate/publication date (2025/07/09 per FINMA notice) - Swiss Annex amendment effectiveNo grace period specified; aligns with "without delay" freezing requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate asset freeze obligations apply "without delay" upon list updates, with FINMA's enforcement type indicating potential fines or reputational damage for lapses; matters due to Haiti's volatility driving frequent UN changes, risking secondary sanctions exposure for Swiss firms
Long term investment Equity Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers French retail investor stock market activity: the AMF analyses changes in behaviour between...
Risk and Trend Mapping Markets Fixed income Asset management Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Fintech The AMF publishes its 2025 Markets and Risk Outlook
On 3 July 2025, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA launched the consultations on the new Ordinances on the Risk Diversification of Banks and Securities Firms and on the Liquidity of Banks and Securities Firms. The consultations will go on until 29 September 2025.
At its meeting on 25 June 2025, the Federal Council was informed of the resignation of Rene W. Keller from the Board of Directors of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA.
Asset management Collective investments Savings protection Crowdfunding: the AMF urges investors to exercise extreme caution due to the risks of project owner default or crowdfunding platform failure
Supervision Professional certification Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the verification and assessment of employee knowledge within asset management companies
Das Staatssekretariat für Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine Änderung der Verordnung vom 21. März 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08) publiziert.
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment has published its 2024 Annual Report
Marketing Long term investment Other professionals Retail investors Journalists The stock market investor journey: the AMF analyses the mobile applications of 14 institutions
Governance Journalists Listed companies and issuers Women on Boards Directive: the AMF is now the competent authority for analysing and monitoring gender balance among the directors of listed companies
Asset management MMF The AMF applies ESMA's guidelines on updating stress scenario parameters, in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation
Cooperation Europe & international The AMF applies the joint guidelines issued by the European Supervisory Authorities to facilitate the exchange of information between National Competent Authorities
Asset management Individual investment mandate Fees: the AMF updates its doctrine following the announcement of the abolition of transaction fees in situations of discretionary management
Marketing Investment advice The AMF reminds financial investment advisors of their professional obligations when using financial product listing platforms
Anti-money Laundering Asset management Crypto-assets Anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority on restrictive measures for crypto-asset service providers
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options Crypto-assets The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Market infrastructures Innovation Europe & international Cooperation Other professionals Market Infrastructures Journalists Investment management companies The French and Italian authorities make proposals for a more competitive...
AI Analysis
The French (AMF) and Italian (Consob) financial authorities have jointly proposed amendments to the EU's DLT Pilot Regime to increase its competitiveness and attract market participants. The Pilot Regime, which became operational in March 2023, has underperformed with only three authorized infrastructures and minimal live trading activity, prompting regulators to recommend structural changes including greater proportionality, expanded eligible instruments, and raised activity thresholds.
What Changed
The proposed amendments address the Pilot Regime's limited uptake by introducing the following regulatory modifications:
*Scope Expansion
Expand eligible financial instruments from current restrictions to all financial assets**
Remove categorical limitations that previously restricted participation
*Activity Thresholds
Raise activity thresholds from €6 billion to €100 billion
Introduce greater proportionality based on project scale**, allowing smaller players simplified requirements
*Operatio
What You Need To Do
*For Market Infrastructure Operators
*Reassess Business Cases
*Prepare Applications
*Monitor Commission Decisions
*Compliance Documentation
Key Dates
March 24, 2026- ESMA report deadline to European Commission on Pilot Regime functioning and recommendationsDEADLINE
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period; full crypto-asset regime implementation
Q2 2026- Expected European Commission report to Parliament and Council with recommendations on Pilot Regime extension, amendment, or permanent conversion
April 9, 2025- AMF and Consob formal proposals submitted
Mid-2022- Original DLT Pilot Regime legislation enacted
Marketing Derivatives or structured products Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF and ACPR Joint Unit publishes its analysis of the French structured product market
Europe & international Cooperation Financial stability, artificial intelligence, data quality and financial education at the heart of the discussions at the AMF 2025 international seminar for securities regulators
Employee savings scheme Retail investors Journalists Employee savings: employees and firms are genuinely satisfied, but there is still a great need for support and education
Anti-money Laundering Asset management AMF invites financial market participants to take part in the EBA consultation on draft AML/CFT implementing standards
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French financial market participants to engage in the EBA's consultation launched on March 6, 2025, on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) for AML/CFT implementing standards under AMLD6 and AMLR, focusing on harmonized risk assessment methodologies for supervisors and obliged entities. This matters because it signals a shift to uniform EU-wide AML/CFT supervision via AMLA (post-EBA handover on January 1, 2026), requiring firms to adapt to standardized risk indicators, data reporting, and enforcement, with new CDD rules applying from July 2027. Participation ensures firms influence final standards amid the transition to a single EU AML rulebook.
#
What Changed
The draft RTS propose harmonized methodologies for AML/CFT supervision, including:
Risk Assessment of Obliged Entities (Article 40(2) AMLD6): A three-step process with indicators for inherent risk (customers, products/services, geography, distribution channels), control effectiveness (governance, policies, procedures, group supervision), and residual risk; annual reviews and ad-hoc reassessments; standardized scoring for consistent EU supervision.
Risk Assessment for Direct Supervision (Article
What You Need To Do
Participate in EBA consultation
Conduct compliance gap analysis
Enhance systems
Prepare for AMLA supervision
Ongoing monitoring
Key Dates
March 6, 2025 - EBA consultation launchon draft RTS for AML/CFT standards (ongoing as of analysis).
January 1, 2026 - EBA hands over AML/CFT mandates, tools (e.g., EuReCa database), and functions to AMLA; existing EBA guidelines remain until replaced.
July 10, 2027 - New AMLD6/AMLR rules apply directly, including CDD for new customers and start of phased compliance.DEADLINE
By July 2032 - Full CDD compliancefor existing customers (five-year transition from 2027).
2028 - AMLA begins direct supervisionof selected high-risk entities.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not yet final, the consultation shapes binding RTS under the new AMLA-led regime post-January 2026 handover, with direct rules from July 2027 requiring system upgrades and data readiness; delays risk non-compliance with harmonized supervision, higher sanctions, and AMLA scrutin
Markets Europe & international Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers The AMF calls on the European Commission for an ambitious strategy on the Savings and Investments Union project
Supervision Asset management Collective investments UCIT Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of its thematic inspections of asset management...
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published an analysis of the performance of the French real estate crowdfunding market, based on data collected from the 10 largest platforms in terms of inflows.
Europe & international Innovation Financial services providers Operational resilience – The AMF applies the Joint Guidelines on the oversight cooperation and information exchange under the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options Crypto-assets The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Sanctions & settlements MAR Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Listed companies and issuers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a US investment fund and its director a total of €10 million for price manipulation during an initial public offering...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined US-based investment fund EcoR1 Capital €7 million and its director Oleg Nodelman €3 million (total €10 million) on 13 December 2024 for price manipulation via "marking the close" trades on Euronext Paris during Innate Pharma's 2019 Nasdaq IPO, plus reporting failures on 5% ownership thresholds. This case demonstrates AMF's extraterritorial reach over foreign actors impacting French markets and underscores personal liability for executives in market abuse violations under MAR.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change; it reinforces existing MAR prohibitions on price manipulation (Article 12), specifically "fixing the price at an abnormal or artificial level" through timed sales at market close to influence linked ADS pricing on Nasdaq. It also highlights ongoing scrutiny of reporting obligations under Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code for crossing 5% thresholds in listed companies.
#
What You Need To Do
Implement pre-trade surveillance for "marking the close" patterns, especially around issuer events like IPOs where Euronext closes influence external pricing
Enhance 5% threshold monitoring with automated alerts and timely filings (4 trading days post-threshold)
Conduct senior manager training on personal liability under MAR for manipulative orders benefiting the firm (e
Review cross-border trading policies for French-listed assets, including jurisdiction assessments for non-EU funds
Perform gap analysis on order timing controls to flag end-of-day volume spikes
Key Dates
October 10-16, 2019- Five trading sessions during which manipulative "marking the close" sales occurred on Euronext Paris.
2019 (exact dates unspecified)- Instances of failing to report exceeding/falling below 5% ownership thresholds in Innate Pharma.
13 December 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines.
16 December 2024- French version of press release published.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Matters due to AMF's aggressive fines (€10M total) and personal accountability for a US fund/director, signaling heightened cross-border enforcement on Euronext trades. Firms should prioritize surveillance upgrades now, as appeals are possible but do not suspend implications; low i
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options The AMF warns the public about the fraudulent Forex investment offering on the LIVAXXEN trading platform
Asset management Marketing Innovation Other professionals Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF awards its 2024 prize for young researchers in economics to Maxime...
Savings protection Financial Scams Crypto-assets Retail investors Journalists The authorities are taking action to combat the massive phenomenon of financial scams catching out an increasing number of individuals
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Periodic & ongoing disclosures Reporting ESEF Closing of the 2024 accounts: The AMF publishes recommendations and the results of its examinations of financial statements
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Listed companies and issuers Faced with dense and complex information, the AMF is encouraging financial institutions to continue their efforts to improve the transparency of their Taxonomy reporting
ETF Equity MIFID Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers ETFs win over newcomers as they invest into the stock market
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor, two asset management companies and their directors, and a credit institution a total of €5,670,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed total fines of €5,670,000 on a financial investment advisor (FIA), two asset management companies (AMCs), their directors, and a credit institution for breaches of professional obligations. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's rigorous scrutiny of operational controls, due diligence, and governance in investment services, serving as a critical reminder for firms to maintain robust procedures to avoid similar sanctions. It matters because it highlights personal liability for directors and escalating fines for systemic failures, potentially influencing peer reviews and audit priorities.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change introducing new rules. It reinforces existing AMF requirements under professional obligations, including:
Implementation of operational procedures for investment/divestment processes, such as verifying lender authorizations.
Systematic anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing (CTF) due diligence on fund assets and liabilities.
Justification of retrocessions (rebates) to distributors, proving enhanced client service quali
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis of operational procedures for investments/divestments, ensuring lender authorization checks (reference AMF Position-Recommendation DOC-2020-05 on portfolio management)
Review AML/CTF due diligence frameworks for fund assets/liabilities, aligning with AMF Regulation 2016-01
Audit retrocession practices to distributors, documenting service quality enhancements (per AMF doctrine on inducements)
Update marketing materials and advisory processes for compliance with honesty/fairness standards
Enhance senior manager attestations and training on personal liability under CMF L
15 September 2025Altaroc Partners decision (appeal lodged to Conseil d’État).
9 July 2025MND insider dealing decision (appeal to Paris Court of Appeal).
10 December 2025Novaxia Investissement decision.
5 November 2025Carat GP FIA decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This signals intensified AMF enforcement on professional obligations in 2025 (multiple similar fines: €1.3M, €1.89M, €0.5M, €2.5M implied, €0.305M, €3.5M), with personal bans and multimillion fines. Matters due to director accountability trends, potential for follow-on audits, and ed
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Publication of the first CSRD sustainability statements: AMF draws issuers’ attention to ESMA's 2024 recommendations
Cooperation Markets Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the AMMC are strengthening their...
Asset management Marketing The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published a recommendation governing the distribution of actively managed certificates (AMCs) to retail clients
Warning Savings protection Warning Forex and binary options Crypto-assets The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several entities proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Supervision Asset management MMF AIFMD Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of a new series of SPOT inspections on the quality of regulatory reporting data
Long term investment Savings protection Retail investors Journalists The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) launches a major financial education campaign aimed at young investors
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures ESMA’s communications to support the implementation and supervision of corporate sustainability reporting
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Corporate Sustainability Reporting directive (CSRD): EFRAG and the European Commission publish implementation guidance and FAQs
AI Analysis
The AMF publication announces implementation guidance and FAQs on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) released by EFRAG and the European Commission, aimed at clarifying reporting standards under the European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). This matters for compliance professionals as it provides actionable tools to meet expanded sustainability disclosure requirements, ensuring audit-ready reporting amid phased rollouts and third-party assurance mandates. It supports harmonized EU-wide compliance for nearly 50,000 companies, enhancing data comparability and investor transparency.
#
What Changed
EFRAG and the European Commission have published specific implementation guidance and FAQs to operationalize CSRD reporting using ESRS, focusing on double materiality assessments, climate disclosures (including Scope 1-3 GHG emissions), and Paris Agreement-aligned transition plans starting in 2025.
CSRD replaces the NFRD with broader scope (quadrupling affected companies to ~50,000), mandatory digital tagging (ESEF/XBRL), limited third-party assurance (phasing to reasonable), and integrated sust
What You Need To Do
Review EFRAG/EC guidance and FAQs for ESRS implementation; conduct double materiality assessment to identify material ESG topics
Map and collect ESG data (GHG emissions Scope 1-3, value-chain impacts) with audit trails; develop Paris-aligned transition plans
Integrate sustainability into management reports with digital tagging (XBRL/ESEF); secure limited third-party assurance
Strengthen data governance, test processes, and monitor updates from EFRAG/EC/AMF
Key Dates
2025- First wave (NFRD reporters: large listed/public interest entities >500 employees) publish CSRD reports for FY2024.
2026- Large EU companies (previously planned for FY2025) deferred to 2028 for FY2027 reporting.
2028- Listed SMEs report for FY2026 (deferred from 2027).
2029- Final wave including certain non-EU firms; CSDDD applies from July 26, 2029.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - With first reports due in 2025 for ~11,000 firms and preparations critical for 2026+ waves, non-compliance risks enforcement, reputational damage, and investor scrutiny. Deferred timelines offer breathing room but demand immediate data readiness amid evolving standards and assurance
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines Sogenial Immobilier and its chairman a total of €180,000
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued a €180,000 combined fine against Sogenial Immobilier (€150,000) and its chairman Jean-Marie Souclier (€30,000) on September 12, 2024, for systematic breaches of professional obligations spanning investment selection, regulatory disclosure, conflict of interest management, and anti-money laundering compliance. This enforcement action demonstrates the AMF's heightened scrutiny of asset managers' operational controls and substantive compliance with fund governance requirements, particularly regarding real estate investment companies (SCPIs).
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement expectations across existing obligations:
Regulatory Documentation Standards: Asset managers must implement documented procedures governing the preparation of all regulatory and marketing materials for alternative investment funds, with particular attention to accurate risk disclosure and asset return reporting.
Investment Due Diligence Standards: A "high standard of diligence" is required when selecti
What You Need To Do
*Audit Existing Procedures
*Formalize Investment Selection Process
*Enhance Conflict of Interest Controls
*Implement Comprehensive AML/CFT
*Strengthen Internal Control Functions
Key Dates
September 12, 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee issued the decision
September 16, 2024- Public announcement of sanctions
No specified deadline- Appeal period remains open (appeals may be lodged against the decision)
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) announces withdrawal of the authorisation of the portfolio asset management company Wide Asset Management as of 8 July 2024
Regulatory developments Post-trading infrastructures Market infrastructures Cooperation Journalists AMF and Banque de France call for a well-anticipated move to T+1 Settlement Cycle
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its directors for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company M Capital Partners €200,000 and its directors Rudy Secco (€70,000) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000) on 31 December 2025 for breaches of professional obligations spanning August 2019 to December 2023, including unauthorized investment services, deficient investment processes, conflicts of interest failures, and inadequate AML/CFT systems. This decision underscores AMF's focus on operational robustness and personal accountability in asset management, serving as a regulatory warning for firms to strengthen internal controls or face escalating sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing AMF requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code for asset managers:
Operational procedures: Investment allocation processes must be precise, traceable, and fully operational; failure to verify compliance (e.g., loan authorizations) breaches honesty, fairness, and diligence standards.
Scope of services: Asset managers acting as tied agents cannot provide unauthorized services like placing financial instrumen
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance AML/CFT
Strengthen governance
Audit marketing/distribution
Senior manager certification
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines on M Capital Partners and directors.
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of identified breaches (investment services, processes, AML/CFT deficiencies).
08 January 2026- Public press release publication date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (Dec 2025) decision, alongside similar fines (e.g., €1.3M on Altaroc Partners in Sep 2025, €400k on Eternam in Sep 2025), signals AMF's intensified scrutiny on asset manager operations post-AIFMD reviews, with personal fines rising (up to €500k+). Non-compliance risks enf
Asset management Notification forms for the cross-border exercise of the activities of passemanagement companies, and the marketing of UCITS and AIFs: the AMF updates its doctrine
Sustainable Finance Asset management Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) publishes the findings of three supervisory initiatives on sustainable finance
Crypto-assets Innovation The AMF publishes the summary of responses received to its Discussion Paper on Decentralised Finance
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has published a summary of stakeholder responses to its June 2023 Discussion Paper on Decentralised Finance (DeFi), analyzing regulatory challenges posed by automated, decentralized crypto-asset activities. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals the AMF's ongoing commitment to developing a balanced DeFi framework amid MiCA's implementation, potentially shaping future supervision of decentralized protocols while emphasizing investor protection and innovation.
#
What Changed
No immediate regulatory changes or new requirements are introduced; this is a non-binding summary of consultation feedback from July 2024, intended to inform future discussions rather than enact rules. It highlights stakeholder views on DeFi's challenges, such as decentralization's impact on traditional oversight, with the AMF planning continued ecosystem engagement to outline proportionate responses. Related updates include clarifications on DASP transitions to MiCA CASP licensing (e.g., abolit
What You Need To Do
Monitor and engage
MiCA compliance
Assess decentralization
Update policies
Key Dates
June 2023- AMF publishes initial Discussion Paper on DeFi regulatory challenges.
July 2024- AMF publishes summary of responses to DeFi Discussion Paper.
December 30, 2024- MiCA enters force for CASPs.
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period for DASPs; full CASP licensing required.DEADLINE
July 2027- EU AMLR ("single rulebook") comes into effect, standardizing crypto due diligence.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This consultation summary does not impose new obligations but underscores evolving DeFi scrutiny within MiCA's firm deadlines (e.g., June 2026 transition end), making it critical for crypto firms to align now to avoid sanctions like DASP withdrawals. It matters for maintaining comp
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Artificial intelligence Innovation Financial products Financial services providers Artificial intelligence: the AMF encourages market stakeholders to take part in two European Commission initiatives on issues specific to the financial sector
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF has published a summary of its SPOT inspections of financial management delegation arrangements at asset management companies
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its director for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee has issued multiple enforcement decisions against financial investment advisors and their management for breaches of professional obligations, with the most recent and significant case involving Carat GP and its directors receiving combined fines of €2.5 million and permanent/extended bans from operating as financial investment advisors. These cases establish critical precedent regarding advisor duties around client disclosure, product authorization, conflict of interest management, and honest/fair conduct—requirements that apply across the entire financial investment advisory sector.
#
What Changed
The enforcement decisions clarify and reinforce several core professional obligations for financial investment advisors:
*Transparency and Disclosure Obligations**
Financial investment advisors must inform clients of any remuneration received for their advice and justify improvements to advisory services in return for compensation received. Advisors cannot recommend financial products without first ensuring their marketing is authorized in the relevant jurisdiction.
*Competence and Care Standa
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Review
*Governance and Documentation
*Training and Culture
*Regulatory Engagement
Key Dates
19 December 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Séquence 13 and Jean-Louis Lehmann (€15,000 fines each; 5-year ban)
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against DCT and Didier Maurin (€150,000 and €200,000 fines; 5-year ban)
9 September 2024- Conseil d'Etat judgment dismissing appeal by DCT and Didier Maurin
24 October 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Salzillo Finance and Jean Salzillo (€20,000 and €80,000 fines; 3-year ban)
2 July 2019- AMF Enforcement Committee decision against Invest Securities and financial advisors (€90,000 to €60,000 fines)
Sustainable Finance Governance Financing the economy Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the ACPR have published their report on the monitoring and assessment of the climate...
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment has published its 2023 Annual Report
Sustainable Finance Investment advice Long term investment Retail investors Journalists Mystery shopping visits to bank branches: the collection of client sustainability preferences remains fragmented
Asset management MMF AMF complies with ESMA guidelines on updating the stress scenario parameters provided for in Article 28 of the Money Market Funds Regulation for 2024
Asset management Sustainable Finance Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law (29LEC): the French Treasury published FAQs in April 2024
AI Analysis
The AMF publication highlights FAQs issued by the French Treasury in April 2024, clarifying key aspects of Article 29 of the Energy and Climate Law (29LEC) reporting obligations for French financial institutions on sustainability integration in investment activities. This matters for compliance teams as it addresses practical ambiguities in scope, consolidation, and EU interactions post-2023 reporting cycles, reducing interpretive risks amid expanding ESG mandates like SFDR. Firms must review these to ensure accurate 2024+ submissions via the Climate Transparency Hub (CTH).
#
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; the FAQs provide interpretive guidance on existing 29LEC requirements from the Energy and Climate Law (8 November 2019) and implementing Decree (29 May 2021). Clarifications cover:
Scope of application: Defines entities required to report on ESG integration (e.g., portfolio asset management companies, ISPs).
Consolidation rules: How to aggregate data across group entities.
Interactions with EU rules: Alignment with SFDR, including narrative reports and s
What You Need To Do
Read and implement French Treasury FAQs
Update 29LEC reports
Integrate clarifications
Monitor CTH
Key Dates
April 2024- French Treasury publishes 29LEC FAQs following 2023 reporting round.
2023 financial year- Deadline for 2024 submissions of narrative reports (CTH) and standardized annexes (ACPR/AMF); analysis published in 2024.DEADLINE
Annual ongoing- Yearly reporting cycle for 29LEC, with 2024 remittances analyzed for 2023 FY; no new deadlines specified in FAQs.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not critical as FAQs clarify existing rules without new mandates, but high relevance for 2024/2025 cycles to avoid supervisory scrutiny from AMF/ACPR amid thematic inspections on asset manager governance. Matters due to rising ESG enforcement, SFDR synergies, and public transparenc
Appointment AMF activity Retail investors Journalists France Mayer appointed Retail Investor Relations and Protection Director at the Autorité des Marchés Financiers
Long term investment Equity ETF Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Dashboard of retail investors active on the stock market: sharp increase in retail ETF activity in Q1 2024
Asset management Europe & international Journalists Investment management companies Austrian, French, Italian and Spanish financial market authorities give their key priorities for a macro-prudential approach to asset management
Professional certification AMF activity Journalists The Autorité des Marchés Financiers announces the new composition of the Financial Skills Certification Board
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Appointment Sanctions & settlements Journalists Valérie Michel-Amsellem becomes Chair of the AMF Enforcement Committee
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces the appointment of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as the new Chair of the AMF Enforcement Committee, the independent body responsible for imposing sanctions in financial market violations. It matters for compliance professionals because leadership changes in enforcement can signal shifts in sanctioning priorities, rigor, or focus areas, potentially influencing how firms approach risk management and remediation. While no immediate policy changes are introduced, monitoring the new Chair's tenure is essential given the Committee's role in upholding market integrity.
#
What Changed
There are no substantive regulatory changes, new requirements, or amendments to the AMF General Regulation outlined in this announcement. The publication solely details an internal governance appointment within the AMF's structure, where the Enforcement Committee maintains its established autonomy for sanction decisions, separate from the AMF Board. This aligns with prior affirmations of the Committee's independence, as upheld in ECHR rulings on its impartiality.
#
What You Need To Do
Review backgrounds of key AMF personnel, including Valérie Michel-Amsellem, for insights into enforcement trends (e
Enhance internal monitoring of AMF sanction releases (https://www
Conduct gap analyses on compliance programs for high-risk areas like market abuse, given the Committee's sanction powers up to €100 million or 10x profits
Key Dates
Immediate- Appointment takes effect upon announcement, with no disclosed transition period.
2026, Enforcement Committee sanction against an asset management company, indicating ongoing enforcement operations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This personnel change does not impose new obligations or alter existing rules, posing minimal immediate risk. It matters indirectly for long-term strategy, as the Chair could steer enforcement toward stricter penalties or novel interpretations of obligations (e.g., as analyzed in hist
Asset management Anti-money Laundering Combatting money laundering and terrorist financing: AMF applies two sets of European Banking Authority guidelines
Innovation Savings protection AMF activity Open Data: publication on data.gouv.fr of the list of Asset Management Companies (AMCs) authorized by the AMF, of the white lists of Digital Asset Service Providers (DASPs) and offers of investments in miscellaneous assets
Supervision Marketing MIFID Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies AMF calls on investment services providers to take account of the specific nature of temporary ownership dismemberment when marketing SCPI units
Appointment Sanctions & settlements Journalists Appointements to the AMF Enforcement Committee
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces the partial renewal of the Enforcement Committee, including four new appointments, two reappointments, and the subsequent election of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as Chair on 28 February 2024. It matters for compliance professionals as changes in committee composition can influence enforcement priorities, sanction severity, and interpretations of financial regulations under AMF jurisdiction.
#
What Changed
There are no new regulatory requirements or substantive changes to laws; this is an administrative renewal of the Enforcement Committee's membership. Key developments include: new members Jean-Claude Hassan (Vice-President of the Council of State appointee, also chairs second section), Xavier Samuel (Court of Cassation appointee), Sophie Langlois and Aurélien Soustre (Ministerial appointees); reappointments of Anne Le Lorier and Ute Meyenberg. The committee maintains its structure of 12 independ
Key Dates
13 February 2024- Ministerial order appointing new and reappointed members.
20 February 2024- Publication of the ministerial order.
27 February 2024- Composition published in the Official Journal.
28 February 2024- First meeting; election of Valérie Michel-Amsellem as Chair and Jean-Claude Hassan as second section Chair.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - This personnel change poses minimal immediate risk but signals potential evolution in enforcement tone under new leadership experienced in sanctions and regulation (e.g., Michel-Amsellem's appellate background). It matters longer-term for firms in protracted AMF proceedings, as commit
Sustainable Finance Financial products Asset management Europe & international Regulatory developments The AMF publishes, in a position paper, the key principles it believes should guide the SFDR review
Europe & international Periodic & ongoing disclosures The European single access point for financial and non-financial information on European entities (ESAP) enters its implementation phase
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Listed companies and issuers AMF publishes an educational guide on companies’ climate transition plans prepared by its Climate and Sustainable Finance Commission
Warning Savings protection Financial Scams Warning The AMF warns the public about fraudulent press advertisements proposing investments in car parks with electric charging points
Asset management Entry into force of the revised European Long-Term Investment Fund Regulation (ELTIF 2) - AMF clarifies fund authorisation requirements
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its director for breach of professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed sanctions on SPI (a financial investment advisor) and its director Vincent Rhodes on 9 January 2024 for breaching professional obligations. This case demonstrates the AMF's enforcement priorities regarding advisor conduct standards and establishes precedent for disciplinary action against both firms and individual managers who fail to meet regulatory requirements.
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement of existing professional obligations for financial investment advisors. The case reinforces that advisors must:
Comply with all applicable laws and regulations governing financial investment advisory activities
Maintain professional standards in their dealings with clients and regulators
Ensure their directors and managers operate within regulatory boundaries
The enforcement action reflects the AMF's i
What You Need To Do
*For Financial Investment Advisors
*Review compliance frameworks - Audit existing policies and procedures against the professional obligations that triggered this enforcement action
*Enhance governance controls - Implement systems to ensure directors and senior management comply with regulatory requirements
*Document compliance - Maintain records demonstrating adherence to professional conduct standards
*Staff training - Ensure all personnel understand the scope of professional obligations and consequences of breach
Key Dates
9 January 2024- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing sanctions on SPI and Vincent Rhodes
Immediate effect- 2-year temporary ban on both respondents from exercising financial investment advisor activities commenced following the decision
Warning Identity theft Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning professionals about the extensive fraudulent and malicious use of its name, with links to various websites that could trick people into running a malicious computer program
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Long term investment Collective investments Shares Retail investors Journalists Equity investment: intentions on the rise again, driven by young people
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Investment advice Other professionals Journalists AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its director for breach of professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a five-year ban on financial investment advisor DCT (formerly Didier Maurin Finance) and its director Didier Maurin from practicing, plus fines of €150,000 on the firm and €200,000 on the director, for recommending unauthorized Samoan AIF investments to 64 clients, failing to manage conflicts of interest (e.g., no conflicts register), and breaching duties of competence, care, and diligence in clients' best interests. This matters as it reinforces AMF's strict enforcement on CIFs (Conseillers en Investissements Financiers) for product authorization checks, conflicts management, and client-centric obligations under MiFID II transposition in France, signaling heightened scrutiny on advisory integrity amid rising sanctions. The Conseil d'Etat upheld the decision on 9 September 2024, dismissing appeals and confirming sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing requirements for CIFs:
Product marketing authorization: CIFs must verify that recommended investments (e.g., AIFs) are authorized for sale in France before advising clients; recommending unauthorized products breaches professional obligations regardless of client outcomes.
Conflicts of interest management: CIFs must maintain an effective conflicts register, identify risks (e.g., personal benefits), an
What You Need To Do
Immediate audit
Conflicts policy enhancement
Training and documentation
Director accountability
Key Dates
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing bans and fines.
9 September 2024- Conseil d'Etat judgment (no. 464877) dismissing appeals, upholding sanctions, and ordering €1,500 costs each to AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This upheld decision (post-2024 appeal) exemplifies AMF's pattern of escalating fines/bans on CIFs for conduct failures (e.g., €2.5M on Carat GP in 2025; €120K-€150K on Capexis upheld 2025), amid 2024-2025 enforcement wave on professional obligations. Matters for CIFs as it heightens
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes summary of third thematic inspection of asset management companies' cybersecurity systems
Asset management UCIT Collective investments The AMF updates its policy on disclosures by collective investment schemes incorporating non-financial methods
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a French tied agent of a Cypriot investment services provider and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined France Safe Media (FSM), a French tied agent of Cypriot provider VPR Safe Financial Group Limited (Alvexo platform), €300,000 and imposed a 10-year ban from tied agent activities and reception/transmission of orders (RTO) services, while its manager Lior Mattouk received a €100,000 fine and similar 10-year ban, for breaches occurring January 2019–September 2021. This decision, dated 10 November 2023 and upheld by Conseil d'Etat on 16 June 2025, underscores AMF's strict enforcement of professional obligations for tied agents marketing high-risk CFDs, emphasizing staff qualifications, client assessments, risk warnings, disclosures, and diligence. It matters for cross-border intermediaries as it highlights personal liability for managers and the finality of sanctions post-appeal, signaling heightened scrutiny on CFD promotion and tied agent compliance in France.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing requirements under French rules implementing MiFID II for tied agents:
Staff qualifications: Tied agents must verify sales staff have minimum qualifications and knowledge; post-hoc inadequate tests do not suffice.
Client knowledge/experience assessment: Questionnaires must be robust, with appropriate scoring; account managers cannot interfere (e.g., by prompting answer changes).
Promotional communicatio
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance manager oversight
Audit CFD marketing
Training programs
Cross-border review
Key Dates
10 November 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision SAN-2023-15 imposing fines and bans.
14 November 2023- French version of press release published.
16 June 2025- Conseil d'Etat judgment (n° 490826) dismissing appeals by FSM and Mattouk, confirming sanctions and ordering €4,000 costs to AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Though dated (2019–2021 breaches), the 2025 appeal dismissal makes sanctions final, serving as a binding precedent for tied agents amid AMF's ongoing CFD enforcement wave (e.g., parallel fines on providers like CIC banks). It elevates personal risk for managers and signals intensifie
Long term investment Risk and Trend Mapping Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Gamification tends to increase investment risk-taking, according to behavioural...
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes a second educational report on taxonomy reporting by listed companies
Long term investment Equity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers An OECD study for the AMF profiles new French retail investors
Marketing Savings protection Retail investors Professional investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF encourage financial institutions to continue their efforts to take account of the vulnerability of ageing clients
Cooperation Fintech Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF and the US...
Fees Savings protection Other professionals Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers The AMF ensures that retail investors are properly informed on fees of financial products
Warning Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Innovation Markets Decentralised Finance (DeFi): IOSCO publishes its consultation report
AI Analysis
The AMF publication announces IOSCO's consultation report on Decentralised Finance (DeFi), highlighting ongoing global efforts to regulate DeFi activities under IOSCO's 2023 policy recommendations. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensifying scrutiny on DeFi platforms for investor protection, market integrity, and financial stability risks, potentially leading to harmonized rules that bridge traditional finance and crypto assets. Firms involved in DeFi must monitor this to align with emerging "same risk, same rule" standards across jurisdictions.
#
What Changed
No immediate binding regulatory changes are introduced, as this is a consultation report tied to IOSCO's 2023 DeFi Recommendations and a 2025 Thematic Review assessing implementation progress. Key focuses include enhanced regulatory cooperation (Recommendation 11), addressing gaps in enforcement for Crypto Asset Service Providers (CASPs), and applying CDA Policy Recommendations to DeFi for risks like financial stability, investor protection, and market integrity. Progress is noted in legal frame
What You Need To Do
Review and comment
Gap analysis
Enhance compliance
Monitor cross-border
Pilot participation
Key Dates
31 July 2025- Cut-off date for assessing Participating Jurisdictions' regulatory frameworks in IOSCO's Thematic Review.
October 16, 2025- Publication date of FSB and IOSCO reports assessing crypto-asset and stablecoin implementation, including DeFi elements.
2 February 2026- IOSCO consultation comment deadline on related reports (e.g., FMIs’ management of general business risks).DEADLINE
6 February 2026- CPMI-IOSCO consultation comment deadline on FMIs’ general business risks guidance, relevant to DeFi infrastructure.DEADLINE
starting 2026.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – While not yet binding, the report underscores incomplete global implementation (e.g., enforcement gaps, regulatory arbitrage risks), with IOSCO/FSB calling for swift action amid 2025-2026 reviews. This matters as DeFi's growth amplifies systemic risks, prompting "same risk, same rule
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company and its directors for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company M Capital Partners €200,000 and its directors Rudy Secco (€70,000) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000) on 31 December 2025 for breaches of professional obligations spanning August 2019 to December 2023, including unauthorized investment services, deficient investment processes, conflicts of interest failures, and inadequate AML/CFT systems. This decision underscores AMF's focus on operational robustness in asset managers, particularly those acting as tied agents, and holds senior managers personally accountable. It matters for compliance as it exemplifies enforcement trends targeting systemic deficiencies, with potential appeals signaling ongoing scrutiny.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change, but it reinforces existing AMF requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code for asset managers:
Operational procedures: Investment allocation processes must be precise, traceable, and compliant; failure to verify or document renders systems non-operational.
Scope of services: Asset managers (and tied agents) cannot provide unauthorized services like placing financial instruments without firm commitment, circumventing licensed activ
What You Need To Do
Immediate gap analysis
Enhance AML/CFT
Conflicts framework
Senior manager attestation
Marketing/retrocessions
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing fines on M Capital Partners and directors.
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of breaches investigated, covering investment services, processes, conflicts, and AML/CFT failures.
08 January 2026- Public press release date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This reflects a pattern of 2025 AMF fines on asset managers for operational/AML failures (e.g., €1.3M on Altaroc Partners 15 Sep 2025; €400k on Eternam 9 Sep 2025), signaling intensified scrutiny post-AIFMD reviews. Matters due to personal liability for managers, appeal risks amplify
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines the Association Nationale des Conseillers Financiers-CIF for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined the Association Nationale des Conseillers Financiers-CIF (ANACOFI-CIF), a professional association approved for investment advisors (CIFs), €250,000 with a warning, and its former president €20,000 with a warning, for breaching professional obligations in membership vetting, controls, archiving, and conflicts of interest management. This decision, dated September 5, 2023, underscores AMF's scrutiny of professional associations' gatekeeping and oversight roles in ensuring CIF compliance. It matters as it signals heightened enforcement against associations failing to uphold regulatory standards, potentially impacting CIF ecosystem integrity and prompting reviews of similar bodies.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing obligations under French Monetary and Financial Code (CMF) for approved professional associations like ANACOFI-CIF. Key breaches highlighted include:
Failure to verify quality of CIF membership application dossiers and non-compliance with internal adhesion procedures.
Non-respect of procedures for member controls, sanctions, and proper archiving of control dossiers.
Violation of internal rules on conflicts of interes
What You Need To Do
Review and strengthen internal procedures for CIF membership vetting, ensuring dossier quality checks align with approved protocols
Implement robust systems for member controls, sanctions processes, and secure archiving of all dossiers per CMF L
Update conflicts of interest policies and registers to fully comply with internal rules and CMF obligations, documenting all identifications
Conduct gap analyses on governance, documentation, and AML/KYC for CIF activities, training staff on operationalizing procedures
For CIF members
Key Dates
September 5, 2023- AMF Sanctions Commission decision issued, imposing fines and warnings on ANACOFI-CIF (€250,000) and M. Patrick Galtier (€20,000).
Post-September 5, 2023- Decision subject to potential recourse (appeal period not specified in public summaries, typically 1 month under AMF procedures).
June 2, 2023- AMF Sanctions Commission hearing where €500,000 sanction was initially sought (reduced in final decision).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This 2023 decision is not imminent but remains highly relevant given ongoing AMF focus on CIF compliance (e.g., 2025 sanctions for similar breaches like archiving and AML failures). It matters for preventing fines, bans, or reputational damage, as AMF targets systemic weaknesses in
Savings protection Cooperation Crypto-assets Retail investors Fintech Journalists The AMF and the ARPP launch the Responsible Influence Certificate in Finance
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) announces withdrawal of the authorisation of the portfolio asset management company Quantology Capital Management as of 30 June 2023
Collective investments Asset management The AMF updates its policy on the information to be provided by collective investment schemes incorporating non-financial approaches
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Altaroc Partners (formerly Amboise Partners SA) €600,000 and its senior managers Maurice Tchenio (€500,000) and Patrick de Giovanni (€200,000) on 15 September 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including lack of operational procedures for fund investments/divestments, inadequate AML/CFT due diligence, unproven benefits of fee retrocessions to distributors, and shortcomings in marketing materials. This decision underscores the AMF's strict enforcement on operational controls, governance, and client protection in asset management, serving as a critical warning for firms to ensure robust, documented procedures and senior manager accountability. It matters because it highlights personal liability for executives and reinforces AMF's educational role through sanction explanations, potentially increasing scrutiny on similar firms.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change; it reaffirms and clarifies existing obligations under French financial regulations for asset managers (sociétés de gestion de portefeuille). Key requirements emphasized include:
Implementing operational procedures for investment/divestment processes, including verification of lender authorizations.
Conducting systematic AML/CFT due diligence on fund assets and liabilities.
Proving that fee retrocessions to distributors enhance client servic
What You Need To Do
Review and document operational procedures for fund investments/divestments, including lender authorization checks
Enhance AML/CFT systems with systematic due diligence on fund assets/liabilities and risk mapping
Audit fee retrocession arrangements to demonstrate tangible client service improvements (e
Validate marketing materials for accuracy and completeness
Conduct senior manager attestations on compliance oversight; implement training on personal liability
Key Dates
15 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines on Altaroc Partners and managers.
16 September 2025- French version of press release published.
Post-15 September 2025- Appeal lodged by Altaroc Partners, Tchenio, and de Giovanni before the Conseil d’État against decision SAN-2025-09 (exact date not specified).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (2025) enforcement demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose multimillion-euro fines (€1.3M total) and hold executives personally accountable for systemic failures in core areas like operations, AML, and client disclosure. It matters for immediate risk as appeals are pendi
Anti-money Laundering Asset management Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority
Long term investment Sustainable Finance Collective investments Retail investors Journalists Sustainable investment: growing interest among French people, especially the youngest
Periodic & ongoing disclosures Sustainable Finance Regulatory developments The AMF responds to the European Commission’s public consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's response to the European Commission's public consultation advocates for simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, emphasizing retained quality in climate reporting, interoperability with ISSB standards, and proportionality while opposing overly complex materiality assessments. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming ESRS revisions that could reduce reporting burdens but maintain investor-focused disclosures, influencing 2026-2028 sustainability statements for listed firms and financial institutions. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-responds-european-commissions-public-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting
#
What Changed
Simplified ESRS Structure: EFRAG's draft reduces mandatory datapoints by 57-71% and ESRS length by 55%, focusing on materiality, fair presentation, and quantitative data while streamlining double materiality assessments and eliminating sector-specific standards. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.iss-corporate.com/resources/blog/eu-sustainability-rules-reset-what-the-2026-
What You Need To Do
Review and refresh double materiality assessments using "gross" impacts, specifying risks/opportunities per topic
Retain "net-zero" definitions in climate plans if used; prepare quantitative climate financial effects data (Option 1)
Evaluate "undue costs" reliefs for non-climate metrics, documenting with time-bound justifications
Monitor EFRAG/EC updates post-November 2025; test voluntary simplified ESRS in 2026 cycles
Align with ESMA 2025 priorities (e
Key Dates
July 31, 2025EFRAG submits simplified ESRS draft for consultation. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
September 29, 2025EFRAG consultation closes. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
End of November 2025EFRAG presents technical advice to European Commission. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
2026 Financial Year (reports in 2027)Voluntary use of simplified standards possible if legislative timeline allows. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european ; https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/depth/csrd-sustainability-reporting
2027 (reports in 2028)Full mandatory application targeted. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/corporate-sustainability-reporting-amfs-response-efrags-consultation-simplification-european
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Revisions offer relief (e.g., 57%+ datapoint cuts) but require proactive preparation for voluntary 2026 use and mandatory 2027/2028; critical for 2025 reporters under current ESRS/"quick fix" to avoid enforcement. Matters due to AMF/ESMA supervision ramp-up, investor demands for co
Warning Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets The AMF warns the public against companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
MAR Anti-money Laundering Pump-and-dump practice: market manipulation sanctioned by the Paris Tribunal Correctionnel
AI Analysis
The Paris Tribunal Correctionnel sanctioned a pump-and-dump market manipulation scheme, where perpetrators artificially inflated small-cap stock prices via social media hype before selling off, violating France's Market Abuse Regulation (MAR). This enforcement action by the AMF underscores aggressive judicial backing for anti-manipulation efforts, signaling heightened scrutiny on coordinated trading schemes, especially in illiquid assets. Compliance teams must prioritize surveillance enhancements to mitigate similar risks amid rising digital promotion tactics.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, reinforcing existing prohibitions under Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 (MAR) against market manipulation, including pump-and-dump tactics like false information dissemination and artificial price inflation . No novel regulatory requirements are introduced, but it exemplifies AMF's collaboration with courts for criminal sanctions, potentially increasing deterrence through public naming and fines. Related AMF General Regulation updates effe
What You Need To Do
Enhance market abuse surveillance systems to detect coordinated trading, unusual volume spikes, and social media-driven hype in small-cap/illiquid assets
Implement staff training on recognizing pump-and-dump indicators, such as group chats luring investors with upside promises
Review client communications policies to block manipulative promotions; report suspicions under MAR Article L
For crypto firms, align with "enhanced" DASP registration and MiCA AML/CFT compliance to preempt manipulation sanctions
Conduct internal audits of trading patterns and escalate to AMF if risks identified
Key Dates
30 December 2024- MiCA mandatory licensing for CASPs; pre-registered PSANs enter 18-month transition .
30 June 2026- End of PSAN transitional period; full MiCA authorization required, with AMF oversight on manipulation risks .DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This case demonstrates swift judicial enforcement (Tribunal Correctionnel conviction), amplifying personal liability for individuals in manipulation schemes and pressuring firms to bolster pre-trade/post-trade surveillance. It matters amid MiCA deadlines, as unlicensed crypto operato
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF examines the systems for valuation of the less liquid assets of UCITS and AIFs
Annual report Savings protection Marketing Financial products Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment publishes its 2022 annual report
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment services providers By two decisions, the AMF Enforcement Committee fines two investment services providers for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee issued two decisions on 19 June 2023 fining Crédit Industriel et Commercial (€1 million) and Banque CIC Sud-Ouest (€250,000) for breaches of professional obligations in investment advisory services, including inadequate suitability assessments, client classification procedures, marketing of unsuitable instruments, and insufficient controls on costs and fees. This matters because it underscores AMF's strict enforcement of MiFID II-derived obligations, signaling heightened scrutiny on operational systems for client protection and potential for substantial fines based on breach duration and scale.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new legislation, but it reinforces existing regulatory requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code and MiFID II transposition:
Obligation to implement an effective operational system for assessing investment suitability in advisory services.
Requirement for compliant client classification procedures aligned with regulations.
Duty to market only financial instruments suited to client profiles.
Mandate for effective control systems over investmen
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis of investment advisory processes against AMF expectations for suitability assessments, client classification, product matching, and control systems
Enhance traceability and documentation of suitability checks, client categorizations, and cost disclosures to demonstrate operational effectiveness
Review and strengthen internal procedures for marketing instruments, ensuring alignment with client profiles and regulatory marketing authorizations (cross-reference to similar past cases)
Implement or audit remedial measures, as considered in fine calculations, including staff training on professional obligations
Test controls for providing clear cost information to clients, avoiding misleading disclosures
Key Dates
19 June 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decisions issued, imposing fines and warnings.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Demonstrates AMF's willingness to impose multimillion-euro fines for systemic operational failures in core client protection areas, with penalties scaled by breach duration, number, and seriousness; firms with advisory services face elevated risk of audits or enforcement if controls
Financial services providers Asset management Marketing European Crowdfunding Services Providers: the AMF publishes a position on marketing communications
Supervision Asset management Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary on the internal processes that aim to ensure compliance with non-financial contractual commitments by asset management companies of ESG/SRI funds
Sanctions & settlements Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctions an asset management company and two of its managers for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned asset management company M Capital Partners and its managers Rudy Secco (€70,000 fine) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000 fine) with a total firm fine of €200,000 in its decision dated 31 December 2025, for multiple breaches of professional obligations spanning August 2019 to December 2023. This case underscores AMF's strict enforcement on operational compliance, scope of authorized activities, and AML/CFT systems in asset management, serving as a critical reminder for firms to ensure robust, traceable processes and manager accountability. It matters because it highlights personal liability for senior managers and recurring AMF focus on tied agents exceeding permitted services, potentially signaling increased scrutiny in 2026.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces and clarifies existing requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code (e.g., Article L. 214-24-1) and AMF rules for asset managers:
Asset management companies (AMCs) acting as tied agents cannot provide placement of financial instruments without a firm commitment basis, as this exceeds the restrictive list of permitted investment services.
Investment allocation processes must be precise, operational, and traceable, w
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance tied agent activities to ensure no unauthorized investment services like non-firm commitment placements; map against permitted services list
Audit investment allocation systems for precision, operationality, and traceability; implement verifiable verifications
Strengthen AML/CFT frameworks
Update conflicts of interest policies with clear identification, prevention, and management procedures
Conduct senior manager attestations on personal oversight; perform gap analysis against this and similar cases (e
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date; fines imposed on M Capital Partners (€200,000), Rudy Secco (€70,000), and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000).
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of breaches investigated.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (Dec 2025) decision directly implicates senior accountability and operational failures in core AMC functions, with fines totaling €305,000 showing AMF's willingness to penalize both firms and individuals. It matters amid a pattern of similar sanctions (e.g., €200k on Eres
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined portfolio asset management company M Capital Partners €200,000, and its directors Rudy Secco (€70,000) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000) on 31 December 2025, for multiple breaches spanning August 2019 to December 2023, including unauthorized placement of financial instruments as a tied agent, non-operational investment allocation processes, inadequate compliance with investment procedures, deficient conflicts of interest management, and non-operational AML/CFT systems. This decision underscores AMF's strict enforcement of operational compliance and scope limitations for asset managers, serving as a critical reminder for firms to ensure robust, traceable systems and director accountability. It matters because it highlights personal liability for managers and recurring AMF focus on AML/CFT and procedural deficiencies, potentially signaling increased scrutiny in 2026.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change introducing new rules. It reinforces existing obligations under French financial regulations (e.g., Monetary and Financial Code) for asset management companies (AMCs), particularly:
Strict limits on services: AMCs cannot provide placement of financial instruments without a firm commitment basis, even as tied agents; doing so circumvents authorized investment services.
Operational investment systems: Processes for allocating investments betwe
What You Need To Do
Audit dual roles
Enhance investment processes
Strengthen controls
Director oversight
Documentation
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date; fines imposed on M Capital Partners, Rudy Secco, and Stéphanie Minissier.
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of breaches investigated.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (Dec 2025) decision aligns with a pattern of AMF fines on AMCs for AML/CFT, procedural, and operational failures (e.g., €200k on Eres Gestion in 2023 for rebates/investments; warnings/fines on Inter Gestion REIM in 2024 for AML). It matters due to director liability, esca
Asset management Sustainable Finance Organisational rules Reporting under Article 29 of the Energy-Climate Law: the AMF updates its policy on how to prepare and submit reports
Sanctions & settlements Asset management Compliance Anti-money Laundering Executive & other private individuals Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company and its manager for breaches of their...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined portfolio asset management company M Capital Partners €200,000 and its managers Rudy Secco (€70,000) and Stéphanie Minissier (€35,000) on 31 December 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations from August 2019 to December 2023, including unauthorized investment services as a tied agent, non-operational investment allocation processes, deficient conflict-of-interest management, and inadequate AML/CFT systems. This decision underscores AMF's strict enforcement against operational failures in asset management, particularly for firms balancing portfolio management with tied agent roles, emphasizing personal accountability for managers. Compliance teams must review this for gaps in procedures, as it highlights how imprecise processes and poor traceability lead to substantial sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing AMF requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code (e.g., Article L. 214-24-1) for asset managers:
Asset management companies (sociétés de gestion) are restricted to specific investment services; providing placement of financial instruments without firm commitment (as a tied agent) circumvents these limits and is prohibited.
Investment systems must be operational with precise allocation rules between funds;
What You Need To Do
Audit investment services scope to ensure no unauthorized placement activities, especially if acting as tied agents; cease and remediate any circumventions
Enhance investment allocation processes with precise rules, full traceability of verifications, and demonstrable operationality
Strengthen conflict-of-interest frameworks with identification, prevention, and management protocols, including documentation
Overhaul AML/CFT systems for effective due diligence on clients, assets, and risks; conduct staff training and test operationality
Review manager accountability
Key Dates
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date; fines imposed on M Capital Partners, Rudy Secco, and Stéphanie Minissier.
August 2019 - December 2023- Period of breaches investigated, covering unauthorized services, investment process failures, conflicts, and AML/CFT deficiencies.
31 December 2025(exact deadline unspecified; standard AMF appeals must be lodged promptly, typically within 1 month).DEADLINE
Savings protection Equity Savings Plan Shares Long term investment Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Listed companies and issuers Equity savings plans : the AMF working group proposes avenues for...
Supervision MIFID Financial services providers Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Provision of market data: the AMF conducts a series of SPOT inspections and identifies shortcomings in compliance with requirements
Asset management The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has withdrawn the authorisation of the portfolio asset management company Quantology Capital Management
Financial disclosures & corporate financing The AMF makes available to listed companies the English version of its recommendations and the results of its examination work of the financial statements
MMF Asset management Regulatory developments The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation for 2023
Warning Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Collective investments Shares The AMF presents its proposals to improve the readability of financial product fees in European law
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF, France's financial markets authority) has proposed a new table for presenting subscription fees on financial instruments and an accompanying glossary to enhance investor readability and comparability, developed in collaboration with the Financial Sector Consultative Committee (FSCC) as input to the European Commission's Retail Investment Strategy. This matters because it targets reconciling MiFID 2 and PRIIPs disclosure requirements, which currently hinder clear fee communication, potentially influencing future EU-level amendments to improve retail investor protection without imposing new obligations.
#
What Changed
Alternative Fee Presentation Table: A proposed redesigned table for displaying costs associated with subscribing to financial instruments, emphasizing investor understanding rather than adding a new document; this requires evolving MiFID 2 regulations as current MiFID 2 and PRIIPs rules are incompatible for such clarity.
Glossary of Terms: A harmonized glossary defining key fee types, tested with non-professional investors using AMF consumer testing tools, to standardize terminology across profe
What You Need To Do
Monitor and Respond
Internal Review
Testing and Training
No immediate obligations, as this is a non-binding proposal requiring EU law changes
Key Dates
2026**.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This is a consultative proposal without firm deadlines or binding rules, but it signals likely EU-level shifts in fee disclosure under MiFID 2/PRIIPs, impacting retail investor-facing firms. It matters for proactive compliance, as early adoption of clearer formats could mitigate fu
Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation: the AMF publishes a study on classifications and fossil fuel exposure in the French funds universe
Employee savings scheme Long term investment Collective investments Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Employee savings: a sharp increase in awareness and ownership of employee savings schemes; support for employees and company managers...
Sustainable Finance Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Shareholder dialogue on environmental and climate issues
MIFID Supervision Retail investors Journalists Mystery shopping campaign to bank branches: progress made in the questioning to client, improvements needed in the information provided
Asset management Anti-money Laundering Anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism: the AMF applies the guidelines of the European Banking Authority
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Investment advice Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined financial investment advisor Capexis €120,000 on 15 February 2023 for breaches including receiving prohibited payments from client loan repayments and failing to disclose commissions from SCPI usufruct subscriptions, with the Conseil d'Etat later increasing the fine to €150,000 on 3 March 2025. This enforcement action underscores AMF's strict oversight of **financial investment advisors (Conseillers en Investissements Financiers - CIFs)** on professional obligations like payment restrictions and transparency. It matters for compliance as it highlights personal liability risks and the educational role of such decisions in clarifying regulations.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing requirements under French financial regulations for CIFs:
Prohibition on non-remunerative payments: CIFs cannot receive payments beyond fees for advisory services, such as loan repayments from clients.
Commission disclosure: CIFs must inform clients of the nature, amount, or calculation method of any commissions received in connection with investment advice, e.g., from SCPI usufruct arrangements.
No aggravating fac
What You Need To Do
Review payment structures
Enhance disclosure policies
Conduct gap analysis
Training and monitoring
Prepare for inspections
Key Dates
15 February 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing €120,000 fine on Capexis.
3 March 2025- Conseil d'Etat judgment increasing fine to €150,000, overturning some findings, and ordering publication on AMF website.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to escalating fines (e.g., €120k to €150k on appeal), permanent/temporary bans in parallel cases, and director liability up to €2m. Recent 2024-2025 enforcements signal AMF's intensified focus on CIF misconduct amid fund scandals, risking reputational damage and oper
Savings protection Marketing Marketing of financial products to ageing populations: publication of an independent academic research report on customer relations and sales processes
Long term investment Equity Equity Savings Plan Retail investors Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers Over 1.5 million retail investors bought or sold shares in...
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines the British company H2O AM LLP and two of its executives at the time of the facts for several breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined UK asset manager H2O AM LLP €75 million and its executives Bruno Crastes (€15 million, plus a 5-year ban) and Vincent Chailley (€3 million) for breaches in managing French UCITS funds, including ineligible Tennor Group investments, liquidity risks, valuation failures, and non-compliance with investment ratios and counterparty limits. This matters as it underscores AMF's strict enforcement on UCITS eligibility, risk management, and prospectus adherence, with cross-border implications confirmed by the Conseil d'État's dismissal of appeals on 13 June 2025. It signals heightened scrutiny on illiquid, unrated assets and "buy & sell back" transactions for EU asset managers.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not new rules, but it reinforces existing UCITS requirements under French Monetary and Financial Code and AMF regulations:
UCITS investments must exclude illiquid, unrated securities outside prospectus scopes; liquidity risks must be properly assessed to ensure redemption capabilities.
Debt holdings per issuer capped at 10%; counterparty exposure (e.g., 5% limit) must include all relevant transactions like buy & sell backs.
Reliable valuation information required
What You Need To Do
Review portfolios
Enhance due diligence
Strengthen governance
Depositary checks
Training/remediation
Key Dates
30 December 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision SAN-2023-01 imposing fines and sanctions.
7 August 2023- Conseil d'État rejects preliminary constitutionality question.
13 June 2025- Conseil d'État dismisses appeals (n. 471548, 471744), upholding sanctions and ordering €3,000 costs to AMF.
June 2025.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Finalized enforcement (June 2025) with massive fines (€93M total) and bans demonstrates AMF's willingness to pursue personal/executive liability for UCITS breaches, especially cross-border. Matters for firms with illiquid strategies, as it amplifies post-2020 liquidity crisis lessons
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Sanctions & settlements Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed a €150,000 fine on **Inocap Gestion**, a portfolio asset management company, for multiple operational and compliance failures between 2022 and the enforcement decision date. This case demonstrates the AMF's enforcement priorities around liquidity risk management, market abuse detection systems, and anti-money laundering (AML/CFT) procedures—critical control areas that asset managers must operationalize effectively to avoid substantial penalties.
What Changed
The decision does not introduce new regulatory requirements but rather clarifies enforcement expectations for existing obligations:
Liquidity Risk Management: Asset managers must establish procedures that are both adequate in design and operational in practice, not merely documented
Market Abuse Detection Systems: Surveillance systems must specify conditions for participation in market surveys and establish clear consequences for non-compliance
AML/CFT Procedures: Risk mapping and client onboar
What You Need To Do
assessments across these areas
*Liquidity Risk Management
*Market Abuse Detection
*AML/CFT Compliance
*Compliance Monitoring
Key Dates
21 December 2022- Enforcement Committee decision date against Inocap Gestion
No specific implementation deadline stated- The decision addresses historical breaches; however, firms should immediately remediate similar deficiencies
Innovation The AMF publishes its proposals for an open finance framework
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets authority, has published proposals for an **open finance framework** via a public consultation, extending open banking principles to broader financial data sharing for enhanced innovation and competition. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming regulatory requirements for secure data access, APIs, and customer consent mechanisms, aligning with EU trends toward open finance while prioritizing consumer protection and market resilience. Firms must engage early to shape the final rules and prepare systems for compliance.
#
What Changed
The publication outlines AMF's proposals for an open finance framework, building on open banking (e.g., PSD2) to include investments, insurance, and asset management data. Key elements include:
Mandatory API-based data sharing for account information and payment initiation, extended to non-banking products like securities and insurance.
Enhanced customer consent and control mechanisms, with granular permissions, revocation rights, and strong authentication.
Security and liability standards align
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation
Conduct gap analysis
Update policies
Engage stakeholders
Test systems
Key Dates
January 14, 2026- AMF publishes 2026 priorities, including open finance as part of innovation framework.
TBD (consultation period)- Public consultation on open finance proposals; firms should check AMF site for exact submission deadline (typically 1-3 months post-publication).DEADLINE
June 30, 2026- End of MiCA transitional period, relevant for crypto/open finance intersections.
2026 (H2)- Expected finalization of AMF AI roadmap and tokenization consultation, influencing open finance APIs.
likely 2027implementation phased over 12-24 months.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – As a consultation, immediate engagement is critical to shape rules, but full implementation may not hit until 2027+. It matters due to alignment with AMF's 2026 priorities on innovation (AI, tokenization, MiCA) and resilience (DORA, cybersecurity), risking fines or supervisory action
Long term investment Shares Collective investments Retail investors Journalists The AMF’s latest savings barometer finds that the French are a little less inclined to invest in the stock market
Governance Sustainable Finance Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Social and environmental responsibility, the focus of the AMF's 2022 report on corporate governance and executive compensation of listed companies
Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes two analyses of the information provided by listed companies under Taxonomy reporting and concerning the effects of...
Sanctions & settlements Investment advice Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned financial investment advisor DCT (formerly Didier Maurin Finance) and its manager Didier Maurin with a five-year ban from practicing and fines of €150,000 and €200,000 respectively for recommending unauthorized Samoan AIF shares to 64 clients and failing to identify/manage conflicts of interest, including lacking a conflicts register. This decision, upheld by the Conseil d'Etat on 9 September 2024, underscores AMF's strict enforcement of client-best-interest and conflicts obligations under French regulations. It matters as it provides binding guidance on due diligence for product marketing authorization and conflicts procedures, signaling heightened scrutiny on financial investment advisors (FIAs).
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change, but it clarifies and reinforces existing obligations for FIAs under AMF rules:
FIAs must verify marketing authorization of recommended products in France before advising clients; recommending unauthorized AIFs breaches competence, care, diligence, and client-best-interest duties.
FIAs require effective, operational procedures for identifying and managing conflicts of interest, including maintaining a conflicts register; failure to do so is
What You Need To Do
Immediate review
Conflicts enhancement
Policy updates
Documentation
assess against AMF Position-Recommendation DOC-2021-05 on FIA obligations (https://www
Key Dates
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee issues decision SAN-2022-04, imposing bans and fines.
9 September 2024- Conseil d'Etat judgment (no. 464877) dismisses appeal, upholds sanctions, and orders €1,500 costs each to AMF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not critical as no new rules or deadlines, but medium due to upheld precedent reinforcing FIA duties amid AMF's pattern of FIA sanctions (e.g., bans/fines in 2022-2025 cases). Matters for FIAs lacking controls, as breaches lead to personal liability, business bans, and fines scalin
Markets Financial disclosures & corporate financing The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) has requested the resumption of listing of ORPEA’s securities today
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Financial products Executive & other private individuals Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF publishes a study on the share price performance of companies using dilutive...
Governance Europe & international The AMF encourages French participants to provide feedback to ESMA’s call for evidence on the implementation of the Shareholders Rights Directive (SRD 2)
AI Analysis
The AMF publication urges French market participants to submit feedback to ESMA's call for evidence evaluating the implementation of the Shareholder Rights Directive II (SRD II), which aims to enhance long-term shareholder engagement, transparency in voting processes, and issuer-shareholder dialogue across the EU/EEA. This matters for compliance teams as it signals ongoing regulatory scrutiny of SRD II transposition and operational compliance, potentially leading to harmonized amendments that could require process updates in shareholder identification, voting transmission, and engagement disclosures. French firms' input can influence future EU rules, mitigating risks of non-compliance with evolving standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes participation in ESMA's review of SRD II (Directive (EU) 2017/828), implemented via national laws by June 2019 and effective from September 3, 2020. SRD II's core requirements include: shareholder identification without delay, electronic/machine-readable transmission of voting and meeting information along the intermediary chain, confirmation of vote recording/counting, transparency on institutional investor and asset manag
What You Need To Do
Submit feedback to ESMA
Review current compliance
Enhance processes if needed
Monitor ESMA/EC outputs
Key Dates
June 10, 2019- EU Member States' transposition deadline for SRD II into national law (e.g., France via law of May 22, 2019).DEADLINE
September 3, 2020- SRD II go-live date for operational requirements like shareholder identification and voting processes.
October 3, 2022- European Commission request to ESMA/EBA for SRD II input, contextualizing ESMA's ongoing review.
of 2026.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - SRD II has been live since 2020, so core compliance is established, but ESMA's review could trigger targeted amendments (e.g., operational standardization), especially for French intermediaries handling cross-border flows. This matters for avoiding supervisory findings in ongoing A
Supervision UCIT Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The AMF calls on investment fund depositaries to strengthen their arrangements for the onboarding and monitoring of asset management companies
Warning Miscellaneous assets Savings protection Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
AMF activity AMF Chair: Proposal to appoint Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces a proposal to appoint Marie-Anne Barbat-Layani as Chair of the AMF, France's financial markets authority responsible for investor protection, market supervision, and regulatory enforcement. It matters for compliance professionals because leadership changes at key regulators like the AMF can signal shifts in enforcement priorities, supervisory focus, or policy directions affecting investment firms, asset managers, and market participants across the EU. While not imposing immediate rules, it warrants monitoring for potential impacts on ongoing consultations and governance expectations.
#
What Changed
No specific regulatory changes or new requirements are outlined in this publication, as it solely concerns a leadership appointment proposal rather than substantive rule amendments. The AMF's standard process for such proposals involves board review and government ratification, but no alterations to the General Regulation, policies, or compliance obligations are proposed here.
#
What You Need To Do
binding appointment proposal without compliance obligations
Monitor AMF website (https
Review existing AMF relationships and prepare for potential shifts in supervisory engagement
Urgency: Low – This is a procedural leadership announcement with no immediate regulatory or operational impacts. It matters for long-term strategic planning, as the new Chair could influence AMF's approach to MiFID II implementation, sustainability integration, or enforcement, but firms face no urge
Equity Savings Plan Long term investment Savings protection Retail investors Journalists The AMF creates a working group on equity savings plans (PEAs)
Supervision Journalists Investment services providers The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on simple, transparent and standardised securitisation
MIFID Sustainable Finance Asset management Sustainability requirements in the distribution of financial instruments: update on upcoming legislation and its implementation dates
Investment services Savings protection Europe & international Retail investors Investment services providers The AMF informs the public of the partial suspension by the CySEC of VPR Safe Financial Group Limited’s authorisation to operate in France
AI Analysis
The AMF publication notifies the public of CySEC's August 3, 2022, decision to partially suspend VPR Safe Financial Group Limited's (operating as Alvexo) authorization to provide investment services in France, prompted by AMF findings of regulatory violations including misleading marketing, inadequate client suitability assessments, and poor tied agent oversight. This cross-border enforcement highlights escalating EU supervisory cooperation under MiFID II, serving as a warning for firms using tied agents in France. It matters for compliance as it underscores risks of AMF referrals leading to home-state suspensions, with subsequent developments including suspension revocation and full license withdrawal by September 2025.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action rather than new rules, imposing specific prohibitions on VPR Safe Financial Group Limited in France:
Ban on accepting new French clients or entering business relationships with them.
Prohibition on advertising or marketing investment services to current or potential French clients, directly or via tied agent France Safe Media.
Restriction on receiving new deposits from existing French clients, except to cover initial margins for open positions upon explicit client r
What You Need To Do
For VPR/Alvexo (during suspension)
Ongoing for similar firms
Client protection
Key Dates
August 3, 2022- CySEC issues partial suspension decision based on AMF findings, effective immediately for French operations.
~October 4, 2022- Two-month deadline for VPR to remediate compliance issues (from suspension date).DEADLINE
Post-August 22, 2022 (exact date unspecified)- CySEC revokes partial suspension after demonstrated compliance.DEADLINE
September 29, 2025- CySEC fully withdraws VPR's CIF authorization pursuant to the firm's renunciation.
October 13, 2025- CySEC publicly announces license withdrawal.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low (as of January 2026). The 2022 suspension is historical, resolved via revocation and superseded by full license withdrawal in 2025, posing no ongoing restrictions. It matters as a precedent for AMF-CySEC coordination on retail misconduct (e.g., CFD marketing, tied agents), urging firms
MMF Asset management The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation
Asset management Savings protection Journalists The AMF is conducting a consultation on the end of life of private equity funds intended for retail investors
AI Analysis
The AMF is conducting a consultation on regulatory reforms governing the end-of-life management of retail private equity funds (FCPRs, FCPIs, and FIPs), with the objective of improving compliance with liquidation deadlines and enhancing investor protection through better information disclosure and operational safeguards. This initiative addresses systemic issues where fund managers have historically failed to respect contractual lifespan commitments, creating liquidity risks and investor communication failures.
What Changed
The AMF has amended its General Regulation and policy framework to implement several substantive requirements:
*Liquidation Compliance & Warnings**
A new Article 422-120-14-1 requires management companies to include a warning in promotional materials if, over the ten years preceding fund authorization, the company failed to respect the lifespan of at least 50% of retail or professional private equity funds under its management. This warning applies only when two materiality thresholds are met:
What You Need To Do
*For All Retail Private Equity Fund Managers
*Audit historical compliance with fund lifespan commitments over the preceding ten years to determine if warning requirements under Article 422-120-14-1 apply
*Implement bank details collection for all funds established after December 5, 2024, incorporating requirements into subscription forms per Instruction DOC-2011-22
*Establish prior notification procedures for substantial changes to fund structure, investment strategy, or operations, with one-month advance notice to the AMF
*Update Position-Recommendation DOC-2012-11 compliance to reflect the extended 15-year lock-up period for newly authorized funds
Key Dates
December 5, 2024- Effective date for new Article 422-120-16 (bank details collection requirement for newly established funds)
November 12, 2024- AMF decision approving amendments to General Regulation
December 5, 2024- Publication in Official Journal of the French Republic
June 13, 2024- Enactment of Attractiveness Law No. 2024-537 (establishing 15-year maximum lock-up period)
January 10, 2024- Revised ELTIF Regulation came into application
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the International Sustainability Standards Board’s consultation on the exposure drafts on international sustainability disclosures
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF), France's financial markets regulator, issued a position paper on July 27, 2022, responding to the International Sustainability Standards Board's (ISSB) consultation on exposure drafts for international sustainability disclosure standards (IFRS S1 and S2). This matters for compliance professionals as it signals France's push for global-EU interoperability in ESG reporting, influencing how firms align ISSB "investor-focused" standards with Europe's double-materiality CSRD/ESRS framework to avoid dual reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/amfs-eu-positions/amf-response-issb-consultation-exposure-drafts-sustainability-disclosure-standards; https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/Position%20paper%20ISSB%20AMF%20-%20July%202022_0.pdf
#
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but AMF's recommendations to ISSB, emphasizing:
Interoperability with EU standards: AMF urges alignment between ISSB's financial materiality approach and EFRAG's double-materiality (impact + financial) ESRS, including jurisdictional working groups for compatibility.
Broad ESG coverage: Calls for sector-agnostic standards beyond climate (e.g., full ESG spectrum via collaboration with EFRAG/GRI).
Phased implementation: Suggests gradual rollout of detailed requirements
What You Need To Do
Monitor and map standards
Engage in transitions
Enhance reporting processes
Stakeholder dialogue
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This 2022 AMF response is historical but highly relevant amid 2025 EFRAG simplifications emphasizing ISSB interoperability, as EU firms juggle CSRD with global ISSB momentum (e.g., IFRS finals in 2023). Matters for avoiding reporting fragmentation, with risks of supervisory scrutiny
Regulatory developments Europe & international Sustainable Finance Periodic & ongoing disclosures AMF's response to the EFRAG consultation on the draft European sustainability reporting standards
AI Analysis
The AMF's position paper responds to EFRAG's 2022 public consultation on the first set of draft European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, welcoming their ambition on ESG topics and double materiality while urging proportionality, international interoperability, materiality focus, and alignment with EU laws like SFDR. This matters for compliance professionals as it shapes final ESRS, influencing mandatory sustainability disclosures for EU firms and financial market participants from 2024 onward, with potential simplifications affecting reporting burdens. https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amfs-response-efrag-consultation-draft-european-sustainability-reporting-standards
#
What Changed
This is a consultation response, not a final rule, but AMF highlights these priorities for ESRS development:
International interoperability: Convergence with ISSB standards to avoid duplication and meet investor needs across jurisdictions. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
Proportionality in disclosures: Gradual implementation, prioritizing climate standards, balancing stakeho
What You Need To Do
Monitor ESRS evolution
Enhance materiality processes
Align reporting systems
Engage stakeholders
Pilot disclosures
Key Dates
July 2022- AMF submits response to EFRAG consultation on draft ESRS. https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2024- First CSRD application for FY 2024 reports (large public-interest entities). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
2025- ESRS adoption by European Commission (first set covering SFDR needs). https://www.amf-france.org/sites/institutionnel/files/private/2022-07/AMF%20appendix%20to%20position%20paper%20on%20EFRAG%20consultation%20July%202022.pdf
TBD (post-2025)- EC Delegated Act on simplified ESRS, subject to 2-month EU Parliament/Council scrutiny. https://www.efrag.org/en/news-and-calendar/news/efrag-provides-its-technical-advice-on-draft-simplified-esrs-to-the-european-commission
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Historical (2022) input shapes binding ESRS already applying in 2024/2025, but ongoing simplifications (e.g., 2025 EC advice) offer relief on burdens; critical for FY2026+ prep amid interoperability push, yet not immediate mandates. Matters for reducing overload, ensuring SFDR comp
Sanctions & settlements Compliance Journalists Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a depositary for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined RBC Investor Services Bank France SA (RBC ISBF) €500,000 plus a warning on 20 July 2022 (published 08 January 2026) for breaches as a UCITS and AIF depositary, including 25 confirmed failures in tiered intervention procedures for investment ratio overruns and deficient monitoring of 14 questionable cash flows over 45 months. This decision underscores AMF's strict enforcement of depositary duties under French regulations implementing UCITS/AIFMD, emphasizing robust controls for ratio compliance, cash flow verification, and documentation. It matters for compliance teams as it provides precedent on what constitutes "irregular and deficient" oversight, potentially increasing scrutiny and fines for similar lapses in depositary functions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it clarifies and reinforces existing depositary obligations under French UCITS/AIFMD rules (e.g., Articles L. 214-7 et seq. Monetary and Financial Code):
Ratio monitoring and intervention: Depositaries must implement tiered procedures for investment/asset composition ratio breaches (e.g., diversification limits); 25 of 28 alleged anomalies were upheld due to redundant but confirmed procedural failures.
Cash flow oversight: Must identify
What You Need To Do
Review depositary controls
Enhance cash flow monitoring
Conduct gap analysis
Update policies/procedures
Appeal if applicable
Key Dates
20 July 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee decision date imposing €500,000 fine and warning on RBC ISBF.
08 January 2026- Public news release/publication date of the decision.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Recent publication (08 January 2026) signals ongoing AMF focus on depositary failings amid H2O-related probes, but stems from 2022 events with no immediate deadlines. Matters because it sets precedents for fine quantum (€500k) on procedural lapses, reinforces liability for cash/rat
Savings protection Cooperation Crypto-assets Fintech Journalists The AMF and the ARPP are stepping up their cooperation to promote clear and responsible advertising of financial products
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines one natural person and five legal entities, including a management company, for failing to comply with several reporting obligations in relation to a concerted action carried out in the context of a takeover bid and, in the case of the...
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed fines on one natural person and five legal entities, including an investment management company, for failing to comply with multiple reporting obligations related to a concerted action during a partial takeover bid.[User Query]. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of transparency rules in takeover scenarios, serving as a critical reminder for market participants to adhere to disclosure timelines to avoid significant financial penalties and reputational damage.
#
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement decision highlighting existing obligations under French financial markets law, particularly those governing concerted actions (actions concertées) and reporting in takeover bids. Key requirements reinforced include:
Timely disclosure of positions and intentions when parties act in concert, as per AMF regulations on major holdings and takeover bids (e.g., Article L. 233-10 of the French Commercial Code and AMF General Regulatio
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance internal procedures for monitoring share positions, identifying concerted actions, and automating AMF filings
Train front-office and compliance teams on takeover bid disclosures, including documentation of coordination (e
Implement pre-trade alerts for threshold breaches and conduct periodic audits of historical filings
For management companies
Key Dates
Within 4 trading days- Declaration of crossing major holding thresholds or intent to continue acquisitions (AMF Form DOC-2005-01).
Immediate (same day)- Notification of concerted action agreements in takeover contexts.
Within 10 trading days- Detailed position reports post-crossing.
in 2025(e.g., 16 July 2025 for inside information breaches).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This matters due to the AMF Enforcement Committee's pattern of fining reporting failures (e.g., €1.89M in July 2025 for late disclosures, €1.7M in June 2025 for shareholder breaches), signaling intensified scrutiny on M&A transparency amid volatile markets. Non-compliance risks fines
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a portfolio asset management company for breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined an unnamed portfolio asset management company €400,000 for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including non-operational investment/divestment procedures, inadequate conflict of interest management with group service providers, lack of transparency on distributor fee retrocessions, deficient client categorization, and weak AML/CFT due diligence. This enforcement action, mirroring recent similar cases against firms like Novaxia Investissement and Eternam, underscores the AMF's heightened scrutiny on operational robustness and transparency in asset management, serving as a critical reminder for firms to ensure procedures are fully implemented and documented to avoid personal liability for executives.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision rather than new legislation, but it reinforces and clarifies existing regulatory requirements under AMF professional obligations for portfolio asset managers (sociétés de gestion de portefeuille). Key emphases include:
Investment/divestment processes must be fully operational, with traceability of compliance checks against fund policies and formalized due diligence before allocations.
Effective conflicts of interest policies are mandatory when using group service
What You Need To Do
Audit internal procedures
Enhance conflict and transparency controls
Strengthen AML/CFT and client categorization
Senior manager accountability
Mock AMF inspections
Key Dates
9 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Eternam €400,000 (similar case on marketing, club deals, conflicts, valuation, AML/CFT).
10 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Novaxia Investissement €400,000 and director €100,000 (investment processes, group providers, distributor fees, client categorization, AML/CFT).
31 December 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining M Capital Partners €200,000 and directors €70,000/€35,000 (investment systems, conflicts, AML/CFT).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Recent cluster of identical fines (€200k-€500k total per case) in late 2025 signals AMF's enforcement priority on operational deficiencies in asset management, with personal sanctions escalating risks for leadership. Firms with similar setups (group providers, AIFs/club deals) face i
Supervision MAR Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Publication of the SPOT inspection campaign summary on market abuse prevention systems in asset management companies
Supervision MIFID Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its SPOT inspections on the theme of best execution in asset management companies
Innovation AMF activity Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The AMF continues its data strategy with the release of short selling data to the public
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Institutional AMF activity Appointment Journalists Appointments to the Legal Affairs Directorate and Enforcement Assistance Directorate of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers
AI Analysis
This AMF publication announces internal appointments to its **Legal Affairs Directorate** and **Enforcement Assistance Directorate**, signaling potential enhancements in legal oversight and enforcement capabilities within France's financial markets regulator. Compliance professionals should note this as it may indicate a renewed focus on rigorous enforcement of market rules, though it imposes no direct regulatory changes on firms.
#
What Changed
There are no regulatory changes, new requirements, or policy updates in this announcement. It solely details personnel appointments within AMF's internal structure, specifically leadership roles in directorates handling legal affairs (e.g., Maxence Delorme as head of Legal Affairs Directorate) and enforcement assistance (e.g., Amélie du Passage as head of Instruction and Enforcement Assistance Directorate). These directorates support AMF's core functions like investigations, inspections, and san
What You Need To Do
*No specific actions are required for regulated firms, as this does not introduce obligations
Review ongoing AMF interactions (e
Update internal AMF contact lists with confirmed governance details from https://www
Track AMF news releases for enforcement trends at https://www
Key Dates
13 February 2024- Ministerial order partially renewing AMF Enforcement Committee.
20 February 2024- Publication of Enforcement Committee appointments.
27 February 2024- Composition published in Official Journal.
16 October 2023- Appointment of Sébastien Raspiller as AMF Secretary General.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low. This matters peripherally for firms anticipating AMF enforcement, as new leaders in Legal Affairs and Enforcement Assistance could signal stricter scrutiny or faster processing of cases, similar to past leadership transitions (e.g., Secretary General appointment in 2023). However, abse
Annual report Savings protection Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The ACPR and AMF Joint Unit for Insurance, Banking and Retail Investment publishes its 2021 annual report
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF reiterates its call for a European regulation of ESG data, ratings, and related services
Sanctions & settlements Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined financial investment advisor Séquence 13 and its director Jean-Louis Lehmann €15,000 each and imposed a five-year ban from acting as financial investment advisors in its decision of 19 December 2023, due to failures in client disclosures, justifying remuneration, operating within regulatory limits, and managing conflicts of interest. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict enforcement of professional obligations for investment advisors, with personal liability for managers, serving as a deterrent against conduct breaches that harm client interests. Compliance teams should note this as part of a pattern of similar sanctions, emphasizing robust governance and documentation.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces core professional obligations under AMF rules for financial investment advisors (Conseillers en Investissements Financiers, CIFs), including:
Client information on remuneration: Advisors must disclose any remuneration received for advice and justify service improvements relative to that pay.
Regulatory scope compliance: Firms must operate strictly within authorized activities, avoiding unauthorized product recommendations.
What You Need To Do
Review and enhance policies
Training programs
Client file audits
Governance checks
Mock inspections
Key Dates
19 December 2023- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines and five-year bans on Séquence 13 and Jean-Louis Lehmann.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This decision highlights escalating AMF scrutiny on CIFs, with fines, bans, and personal accountability in multiple recent cases (2022-2025), signaling increased inspection risk and potential for director bans. It matters because failures in basic conduct rules lead to severe, long-t
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes a summary of its findings regarding the costs and fees of UCITS marketed to retail investors
Sanctions & settlements Investment advice Other professionals Executive & other private individuals Investment services providers The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined a financial investment advisor (FIA) firm and its manager for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including failure to provide mandatory documents, inadequate risk disclosure, poor KYC practices, misleading information, unauthorized placing activities, and improper third-party marketing mandates. This enforcement action underscores the AMF's strict scrutiny of FIAs, emphasizing due care, conflict management, and adherence to status limits, with fines and bans serving as deterrents. Compliance teams should review it for lessons on documentation, client suitability, and outsourcing controls to avoid similar sanctions.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a regulatory change, but it reinforces and clarifies existing FIA obligations under French regulations (e.g., AMF General Regulation). Key requirements highlighted include:
Mandatory delivery of initial contact documents, engagement letters, and written reports to clients.
Clear specification of remuneration terms and comprehensive risk information for recommended products.
Thorough KYC to ensure suitability of advice.
Prohibition on misleading information, s
What You Need To Do
Conduct Documentation Audit
Enhance KYC and Suitability Processes
Strengthen Conflicts Framework
Review Activity Scope
Training and Monitoring
Key Dates
24 January 2019AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Novactifs Patrimoine €250,000 and CEO €100,000 for breaches from March 2014–July 2016.
11 April 2022AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing 5-year bans and fines (€150,000 firm, €200,000 manager) on DCT/Didier Maurin Finance; appeal dismissed by Conseil d'Etat on 9 September 2024.
4 November 2024AMF fines totaling €5,670,000 on FIA Smart Tréso Conseil, asset managers, and CACEIS Bank for fund marketing/management breaches.
5 November 2025AMF Enforcement Committee decision fining Carat GP and directors €2.5 million total, with permanent/10-year bans (French release: 6 November 2025).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters as part of a pattern of escalating AMF enforcement against FIAs (fines up to €2.5M, lifetime bans in recent cases), signaling heightened focus on investor protection and governance amid complex products. Firms should prioritize audits now to preempt inspections, but no
Asset management Regulatory developments Other professionals Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF launches a consultation on the integration of sustainability requirements into its General Regulation
AI Analysis
The AMF has launched a public consultation to integrate sustainability requirements into its General Regulation, aiming to embed ESG considerations directly into core operational rules for regulated entities. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals a shift toward mandatory sustainability integration across asset management and investment services, aligning with EU frameworks like SFDR and CSRD, and potentially increasing reporting and risk management obligations.
#
What Changed
Integration of sustainability risks: The updated General Regulation requires asset management companies to explicitly take sustainability risks into account when complying with existing requirements (e.g., paragraphs 6-9 on governance and operations), marking a formal embedding of ESG into the AMF's foundational rulebook.
Alignment with EU sustainability frameworks: Builds on SFDR revisions by advocating for minimum environmental criteria in Article 8/9 products, simplification of rules, and sup
What You Need To Do
Participate in consultation
Review and update policies
Fund name compliance
Enhance reporting
Monitor EU developments
Key Dates
21 November 2024- Application date for ESMA Guidelines on ESG fund names (new funds).
21 May 2025- Application date for ESMA Guidelines on ESG fund names (existing funds).
30 December 2024- AMF ESG Doctrine updated to comply with ESMA Guidelines.
30 June 2026- General Regulation of the AMF enters into force, including sustainability risk integration.
January 13, 2026- Referenced date for public consultation on General Regulation changes (exact consultation close date not specified in available data).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - While the General Regulation effective date is 30 June 2026, related ESG rules (e.g., fund names) are already applicable, and consultation input is time-sensitive. This matters due to escalating EU sustainable finance enforcement, greenwashing risks, and operational overhauls require
Marketing Investing wisely Retail investors Journalists The ACPR and AMF are urging professionals to improve their practices in online marketing of savings products and financial instruments
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its manager for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee imposed significant sanctions on DCT (formerly Didier Maurin Finance) and its manager Didier Maurin for recommending unauthorized alternative investment funds to clients and obstructing regulatory investigations. This case exemplifies critical compliance failures in product authorization verification and client suitability assessment, with enforcement upheld by France's highest administrative court in September 2024.
What Changed
This enforcement action clarifies several regulatory obligations for financial investment advisors:
Product Authorization Verification: Financial advisors must verify that recommended investment products are authorized for marketing in France before advising clients, regardless of the product's legitimacy in other jurisdictions.
Client Interest Prioritization: Recommending unauthorized products is inherently contrary to client interests and constitutes a breach of the duty to act with competen
What You Need To Do
*Immediate compliance measures for financial investment advisors:
*Product Authorization Audit
*Pre-Recommendation Due Diligence
*Client Suitability Documentation
*Regulatory Cooperation Protocol
Key Dates
11 April 2022- AMF Enforcement Committee issued original decision imposing five-year ban and fines
18 July 2022- Conseil d'État suspended enforcement of fines pending appeal
9 September 2024- Conseil d'État dismissed appeal, upholding all sanctions and ordering payment of €1,500 each to AMF
Appointment Journalists Investment management companies The AMF announces the appointment of Jessica Reyes as Director of the Asset Management Regulation Division
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Market infrastructures Order Retail investors Market Infrastructures Journalists AMF publishes an analysis of retail investor order execution on French stocks
Short selling Equity Financial Crisis Executive & other private individuals Market Infrastructures Post-trade Infrastructures Professional investors Journalists French and Dutch market authorities publish a joint analysis of the...
Asset management Savings protection Journalists Investment management companies The AMF announces the creation of a working group on the end-of-life of private equity funds
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF to call for an amendment of the law on obstructing investigations and inspections
AI Analysis
The AMF announced its intention to propose legislative amendments to the French Monetary and Financial Code following a January 28, 2022 Constitutional Council decision that found dual prosecution for obstructing AMF investigations and inspections unconstitutional. The amendment aims to eliminate the possibility of simultaneous administrative and criminal penalties for the same obstruction conduct, while preserving the AMF's enforcement authority.
What Changed
The primary regulatory change addresses a constitutional violation regarding dual prosecution under the ne bis in idem principle:
Current problem: The Monetary and Financial Code previously allowed both administrative sanctions by the AMF Enforcement Committee and criminal prosecution for identical obstruction conduct, violating the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy.
Proposed solution: Legislative amendments will eliminate the possibility of dual prosecution while maintaining
What You Need To Do
*For compliance professionals and regulated entities:
*Review cooperation policies
*Assess ongoing proceedings
*Monitor legislative developments
*Counsel on cooperation
Key Dates
January 28, 2022- Constitutional Council decision declaring dual prosecution unconstitutional
No specific implementation deadline stated- AMF committed to proposing amendments "as soon as possible"
Current status (as of January 2026)- Amendments appear to be in legislative proposal stage; no effective date yet announced
Europe & international Sustainable Finance Asset management The AMF invites providers, users and rated entities to respond to ESMA's Call for evidence on the ESG rating market in Europe
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging French stakeholders—ESG rating providers, users, and rated entities—to respond to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence on the EU ESG rating market to inform European Commission efforts on improving transparency and reliability. This matters as it contributes to the foundational data driving the ESG Ratings Regulation (EU 2024/3005), which imposes authorization, disclosure, and conflict-of-interest rules on providers, affecting sustainable finance compliance across the EU. With the regulation applying from 2 July 2026, early engagement helps shape final rules amid ongoing ESMA consultations on technical standards.
#
What Changed
This AMF notice itself introduces no new regulatory changes; it promotes responses to ESMA's 2022 Call for Evidence, which gathered market insights to support the European Commission's July 2021 sustainable finance strategy. However, it highlights the push for a European framework on ESG ratings, including transparency on methodologies, conflict-of-interest management, internal controls, and dialogue with rated companies—elements now codified in the ESG Ratings Regulation effective 2 January 202
What You Need To Do
For ESG Providers
For Users and Rated Entities
All Affected Firms
AMF Stakeholders
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The 2022 Call for Evidence is historical, but it feeds into the ESG Ratings Regulation now in force (since 2 January 2025), with application looming on 2 July 2026—less than 6 months away as of January 2026. Firms face authorization risks, operational overhauls for conflicts/disclosu
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Covid-19 Closing of the 2021 financial statements: the AMF publishes its recommendations and the results of its recent work examining financial statements
Asset management Prospectus Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF proposes measures to promote a wider adoption of liquidity management tools by fund managers
Financial disclosures & corporate financing Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers Takeover listed companies The AMF proposes targeted measures to make financial markets more attractive for companies
Long term investment Retail investors Journalists More than one million new retail investors have entered equity markets in France over the last 3 years, according to the AMF's dashboard
Sanctions & settlements Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines an asset management company for several breaches of its professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee fined asset management company Altaroc Partners €600,000 and its senior managers Maurice Tchenio (€500,000) and Patrick de Giovanni (€200,000) on 15 September 2025 for multiple breaches of professional obligations, including lack of operational procedures for fund investments/divestments, inadequate AML/CFT due diligence, unproven benefits of fee retrocessions to distributors, and shortcomings in marketing materials. This decision underscores AMF's focus on operational controls, due diligence, and transparency in asset management, serving as a key enforcement precedent that highlights personal liability for senior managers. Compliance teams must review it to strengthen internal procedures and governance amid rising AMF scrutiny on these issues.
#
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a regulatory change introducing new rules; it enforces existing obligations under French financial regulations for asset management companies (sociétés de gestion de portefeuille). Key breaches clarified include:
Absence of operational procedures for investment/divestment processes, failing to verify lender authorizations, breaching duties to act honestly, fairly, professionally, with skill, care, and diligence.
Inability to demonstrate that retrocessed managem
What You Need To Do
Implement and document operational procedures for all investment/divestment processes, including third-party authorization checks (e
Conduct and document systematic AML/CFT due diligence on fund assets/liabilities, ensuring risk mapping and procedures are operational
Substantiate retrocessions of fees to distributors with evidence of enhanced client services; otherwise, cease or disclose fully
Review and enhance fund marketing materials for accuracy, comprehensiveness, and non-misleading content
Senior managers
Key Dates
15 September 2025- AMF Enforcement Committee decision issued, imposing fines on Altaroc Partners and managers.
16 September 2025- French version of press release published.
202509 (date not specified in available data).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This recent (2025) decision signals intensified AMF enforcement on core operational failures in asset management, with total fines of €1.3 million and personal accountability, amid a pattern of similar actions (e.g., M Capital Partners €305,000 in Dec 2025, Eternam €400,000 in Sep 20
Sustainable Finance Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers The ACPR and AMF publish their report on climate-related commitments of French financial institutions
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Crypto-assets Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Sustainable Finance Annual report Disclosure Obligations Taxonomy Article 8: The AMF informs issuers about the phased application of reporting requirements
Asset management Transposition of the directive on the cross-border distribution of collective investment undertakings: the AMF amends its General Regulation and its policy
Asset management MMF The AMF complies with the ESMA guidelines on updating stress test scenarios in accordance with Article 28 of the Money Market Fund Regulation
Asset management The AMF has postponed the effective date of the authorisation withdrawal of the asset management company Nestadio Capital
AI Analysis
The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) postponed the effective date of the authorization withdrawal for Nestadio Capital, a portfolio asset management company, to allow time for fund transfers or liquidation following repeated non-compliance with authorization terms. This matters for compliance professionals as it illustrates AMF's enforcement approach to regulatory breaches in asset management, emphasizing orderly wind-downs to protect investors while signaling risks of judicial intervention if issues persist. The case culminated in judicial liquidation by 2022, highlighting long-term consequences for non-compliant firms.
#
What Changed
Initial authorization withdrawal decided on 17 December 2019 due to Nestadio Capital's failure to comply with authorization terms, including capital requirements, with original effective date at the latest 1 July 2020 (or upon fund transfer/liquidation).
Multiple postponements: 9 June 2020 and 8 December 2020 extended to 30 June 2021; 8 June 2021 further extended to 31 December 2021 to facilitate fund sales and liquidation.
7 December 2021 postponement tied withdrawal effect to full fund liquida
What You Need To Do
For Nestadio Capital (historical)
For investors
For industry peers
AMF referrals to courts underscore need for firms to self-report issues early to avoid escalation
Key Dates
17 December 2019- AMF Board decides authorization withdrawal.
1 July 2020- Original latest effective date for withdrawal (or fund transfer/liquidation).
9 June 2020& **8 December 2020** - Postponements to **30 June 2021**.
8 June 2021- Postponement to **31 December 2021** for fund sales/liquidation.
4 October 2021- Conseil d'Etat rejects Nestadio's appeal.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low - This is a resolved 2019-2022 enforcement case with no ongoing deadlines or new rules as of 2026; Nestadio is in judicial liquidation. It matters as a precedent for AMF's phased withdrawal process, protecting investors via extensions and liquidators, but warns asset managers of severe
Warning Savings protection Financial Scams Warning The AMF urges retail investors to exercise extreme caution towards proposals to invest in rooms in care homes
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities offering in France investments in Forex and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Atypical products Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning Financial Scams The AMF, AFG, ASPIM, France Invest, Anacofi, Cie CIF, CNCGP and CNCIF warn the public against an upsurge in the theft of names of authorised market players
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning Miscellaneous assets: the AMF adds to its black list and, for the first time, has access blocked to unauthorised websites
Warning Savings protection The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments or offering binary options trading without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection The AMF announces the referral of two investigation files on “boiler room marketing” to the National Financial Prosecutor’s Office
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The AMF is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Derivatives or structured products The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities proposing in France via their websites, without being authorized to do so, forex investments and investment services in...
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against the activities of several entities proposing in France via their websites, without being authorized to do so, forex investments and investment services in crypto-assets derivatives
Warning Covid-19 Savings protection Financial Scams The AMF and the ACPR warn the public of the risks of scams in the context of the coronavirus epidemic
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers is calling on retail investors to exercise utmost vigilance with regard to whisky investment offers
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Derivatives or structured products Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers and the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites...
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments or offering binary options trading without being authorized to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection Atypical products The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns the public against the activities of certain websites offering to sell shares of La Française des Jeux without authorisation
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (ACPR) warn the public about a number of unauthorised online investment services in France for derivatives whose underlyings include crypto...
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers warns the public about the websites www.lascpi.fr and www.scpi-gouv.fr improperly using its name and logo
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (ACPR) warn the public about a number of unauthorised online investment services in France for derivatives whose underlyings include crypto...
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (ACPR) warn the public about a number of unauthorised online investment services in France for derivatives whose underlyings include crypto...
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against the entity MAG Asset and the website www.magasset.com
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers warns the public about case of fraudulent use of the names and contact details of the SICAV Objectif Finance Investissements (OFI)
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against the activities of ECI Luxembourg and the website www.eci-luxembourg proposing investment services without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de resolution (ACPR) warn the public about a number of unauthorised online investment services in France for derivatives whose underlyings include crypto...
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) are warning the public against the activities of Patrimoine Gestion Management and PGM Patrimoine
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against the activity of AGRONOMIX and its French subsidiary AGRONOMIX FRANCE
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) would like to warn the public about a number of unauthorised online investment services in France for derivatives whose underlyings include crypto assets.
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers warns the public about cases of the fraudulent use of its name and contact details by a certain Stéphane Delaplace
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against the activities of the website https://epargne-eco.fr/
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is warning the public against several companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Crypto-assets Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is publishing a list on its website of unauthorized companies proposing atypical investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR) are warning the public against the activities of bil patrimoine and the website www.bil-gestionpatrimoine.com proposing investment services and savings...
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering diamond investments
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) warns the public against the company International Markets Live LTD (IMarketsLive)
Warning Savings protection Atypical products Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) is publishing a list on its website of unauthorized companies proposing atypical investments without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Miscellaneous assets Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering diamond investments
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) warns the public against the activities of "Naftoil" and its director Mr Raphael Comté proposing investments services without being authorized to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) warns the public against the activities of www.chs-capital.com engaging in unauthorized investment services
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of unauthorized websites offering binary options
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning issues a public warning against the activity of unauthorized websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) advises the clients of the website eu.bancdebinary.com to contact Banc de Binary Ltd, the owner of these websites, as soon as possible
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) advises the clients of the websites www.ytftradeltd.com, www.investing-area.com, www.buzztrade.com, www.binaryroyal.com and www.cfdroyal.com to contact AirFinance Pro Ltd, the owner of these websites, as soon as possible
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des marchés financiers and the Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) issues a public warning concerning communication from BLUE STONE LTD and companies related to it with respect to diamond investment offers
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) advises the clients of the websites www.interactiveoption.com, www.interactive-option.com, www.hellobrokers.com, www.mtxplus.com and www.pegasecapital.com to contact Pegase Capital Ltd, the owner of these websites, as soon as possible
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a general public warning about sites touting the benefits of an algorithm and linking to a trading platform, and a specific warning about Preditrend
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité de contrôle prudentiel et de résolution (ACPR), the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) and the General Directorate for Competition Policy, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) warn the public about "Plan B" and the website BourseBinaire.fr
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns about persons using its name and logo and impersonating the Ombudsman and her deputy
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) issues a public warning against the activities of 14 unauthorised websites and operators
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and The Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and The Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Warning The French Prudential Supervisory Authority and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warns the public against the company EMIRATES PACIFIC GROUP
Warning Warning Financial disclosures & corporate financing The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) has issued a public warning against the activities of individuals impersonating the delegate of the AMF Ombudsman by making false referrals to FIN-NET, the European Commission body in charge of...
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and The Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so.
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution and the Autorité des Marchés Financiers warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so.
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns the public about the activities of individuals claiming to work for the AMF
Warning Savings protection Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) warns the public about the activities of individuals claiming to work for the AMF
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) updates the list of unauthorised websites offering binary options trading
Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options Warning The Autorité des Marchés Financiers and the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so.
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers and the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so
Warning Savings protection The Autorité des Marchés Financiers and the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution warn the public against the activities of several websites and entities proposing Forex investments without being authorised to do so