Shojin Financial Services Limited (Shojin) is a crowdfunding platform authorised and regulated by the FCA. Shojin allowed customers to make investments that were used to fund loans toward property developments. On 23 March 2026, Shojin went into administration. Simon Carvill-Biggs and Ian Corfield of FRP Trading Advisory Limited were appointed as Joint Administrators.The Joint Administrators are responsible for acting in the best interests of the people who are owed money by Shojin, and they ...
The Bank is today announcing a simplification and reduction in the Discount Window Facility (DWF) pricing, as part of its previously announced review of the DWF.
On 25 March 2026, following a petition filed by the FCA, the High Court ordered that Equity for Growth (Securities) Limited (EFG) be wound up. EFG is a corporate finance firm. EFG was also a principal for a number of appointed representatives between 2015 and 2020, including Amyma Ltd and Osborne Baldwin Ltd, which traded as Hunter Jones.An appointed representative carries on regulated activity under the responsibility of an authorised firm, known as 'the principal'. Find more information on ...
The Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority have finalised a package of changes to firms’ resolution reporting and disclosure requirements which reduces the burden of regulation while maintaining a robust and credible regime that supports growth and competition.
**SS9/17 - Recovery Planning** is the PRA's supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK banks, building societies, and designated investment firms must prepare and maintain recovery plans to ensure financial stability during periods of stress. This guidance supersedes the previous SS18/13 and represents a substantial tightening of recovery planning requirements, making credible, testable, and executable recovery plans a core component of prudential regulation rather than a compliance checkbox.
What Changed
SS9/17 introduced several material enhancements to recovery planning requirements:
*Governance and Integration**: Recovery planning must be embedded within firms' risk management frameworks, with board-level oversight and integration with stress testing and ICAAP processes. The PRA expects clear governance documentation showing how plans are produced, reviewed, signed off, and implemented.
*Fire Drill Exercises**: Firms must conduct regular fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios in a live environment, testing governance arrangements, management information systems, and the...
What You Need To Do
*Develop comprehensive recovery plans containing all minimum elements specified in the Recovery Planning Part of the PRA Rulebook and detailed in SS9/17
*Establish governance frameworks documenting how recovery plans are produced, reviewed, approved by the board, and how recovery options would be implemented
*Conduct fire drill exercises that simulate recovery scenarios, test governance arrangements, and validate management information capabilities
*Create implementation playbooks (for complex plans) that enable rapid execution by senior management during stress
*Perform detailed impact analysis for each recovery option, quantifying capital and liquidity impacts with realistic timelines
Key Dates
11 December 2017- SS9/17 first published and became effective
21 September 2017- PRA consultation deadline for CP9/17 (the consultation paper preceding this statement)DEADLINE
Second half of 2017- Proposed implementation date for superseding SS18/13 (achieved with December 2017 publication)
Ongoing- Firms must maintain and test recovery plans continuously; the PRA notes this statement "may be revised as recovery planning becomes further embedded in firms' risk management practices"DEADLINE
PS10/26 finalizes PRA proposals to raise the Resolution Assessment threshold from £50 billion to £100 billion in retail deposits and reduce recovery plan review frequency for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) from annually to biennially, enhancing proportionality in resolution and recovery frameworks post-financial crisis. These changes reduce regulatory burden on smaller firms while maintaining safety and soundness, directly supporting PRA objectives of competitiveness and growth. Compliance teams must assess scope changes immediately to align reporting and planning cycles.
What Changed
Resolution Assessment Threshold: Increased from £50 billion to £100 billion in retail deposits, limiting reporting and disclosure requirements under the Resolution Assessment Part of the PRA Rulebook to only the largest firms posing systemic risks.
Recovery Plans Review Frequency: For SDDTs and SDDT consolidation entities, reduced from at least annually to at least every two years, aiming for higher quality plans with less frequent reviews.
Rulebook and Guidance Updates: Amendments to Resolution Assessment Part (Appendix 2), Recovery Plans Part (Appendix 3), and Supervisory Statement SS9/17 –...
What You Need To Do
Scope Assessment
Recovery Plans
Reporting/Disclosure
Key Dates
1 April 2026 - Effective date for PS10/26 changes, including new £100bn threshold and biennial recovery plan reviews for SDDTs.
2 October 2026 - Expected submission date for first Resolution Assessment reports for in-scope firms (as previously communicated by PRA).
11 June 2027 - Expected publication date for first disclosures under amended threshold.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 April 2026 (imminent from March 2026), with first reports due 2 October 2026; firms between £50-100bn retail deposits gain immediate burden relief (exiting scope), while largest firms face no new burdens but must confirm ongoing compliance. Matters due to proportionality aligning with PRA growth objectives, reducing costs for mid-tier banks/building societies amid economic pressures, but requires swift deposit recalibration to avoid inadvertent non-compliance.
PS11/26 finalizes PRA rules enhancing Pillar 3 disclosures on resolvability resources (MREL), capital distribution constraints (CDCs), and disclosure basis for UK banks and building societies. It matters because it standardizes information to boost market discipline, user comparability, and confidence in orderly resolution, directly impacting financial stability and compliance reporting. No substantive changes from CP16/25 consultation, with minor clarifications only.
What Changed
Standardized MREL disclosure templates: Replaces free-form disclosures with four new templates aligned to Basel BCBS TLAC formats (adapted for UK), expanding scope to more firms for consistency on MREL adequacy.
Qualitative CDC narrative: Added to UK CC1 template for firms subject to CDCs, enabling market assessment of restriction impacts; removes obsolete Systemic Risk Buffer (SRB) disclosure post-O-SII buffer replacement.
Disclosure basis statement: Firms must specify their Pillar 3 regime (e.g., resolution entity, O-SII, large institution), frequency, and details like reference date,...
What You Need To Do
Update Pillar 3 processes to use new MREL templates (Annex XXVII instructions), UK CC1 with CDC narrative, and basis statement (e
For CDC-subject firms
Ensure semi-annual disclosure of key metrics (Article 447 points a-g) where required
Integrate into consolidated reporting for UK parents; test templates/instructions from appendices
Review for alignment with broader CRR changes (e
Key Dates
17 March 2026- PS11/26 and accompanying rule instruments (e.g., Disclosure (CRR) Instrument 2026) published.
1 January 2027- Policy effective date; rules apply from this date.
H1 2027- First disclosures under new policy published, covering period ending **31 December 2026** (annual/semi-annual as applicable).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 January 2027 requires immediate template/system updates for H1 2027 disclosures (year-end 2026 data), with standardized formats limiting flexibility and raising non-compliance risks to market discipline objectives. Impacts reporting teams, resolution planning, and investor relations; proportional design minimizes burden but demands proactive gap analysis given no transition grace beyond effective date.
PS9/26 finalizes targeted amendments to MREL reporting templates, including changes to MRL001 and MRL003 data elements and the deletion of MRL002, reducing reporting burdens while maintaining resolution planning oversight. This matters for compliance teams as it streamlines processes under the PRA's Future Banking Data programme, with implementation from 1 January 2027, enabling firms to reallocate resources efficiently.
What Changed
Amendments to data elements in the MREL resources template (MRL001) and MREL debt template (MRL003), with full deletion of the MREL resources forecast template (MRL002).
Consequential updates to reporting instructions (Appendix 2) and Supervisory Statement SS19/13 (Appendix 3), including relocation of instrument scope descriptions to reporting instructions for clarity.
No changes to quarterly reporting frequency for MRL001/MRL003, despite industry requests for semi-annual alignment, to ensure monitoring of loss-absorbing capacity.
PRA to publish updated reporting taxonomy shortly.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal reporting systems to incorporate revised MRL001/MRL003 templates and deleted MRL002 by 1 January 2027
Implement updated reporting instructions and SS19/13 amendments, including clarified scope of instruments in MRL templates
Prepare for Q4 2026 data submission in February 2027 using new taxonomy (to be published shortly by PRA)
For firms with deleted COREP13 templates, cease submissions from April 2026 cycle
Conduct gap analysis against SS19/13 changes and test processes for quarterly MREL reporting continuity
Key Dates
1 January 2027- Revised MRL001 and MRL003 templates effective; first submissions of 2026 Q4 data (ending 31 December 2026) due in **February 2027**.DEADLINE
1 April 2026- Partial revocation of UKTS 2018/1624 (COREP13), deleting certain templates ahead of April 2026 cycle for period ending 31 December 2025.
1 April 2026- PS10/26 effective (related: Resolution Assessment threshold amendments, reports due 2 October 2026).DEADLINE
1 January 2027- PS11/26 effective (related: disclosures from 2027 H1 for period ending 31 December 2026).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Changes reduce burden (net simplification, ~25% per industry feedback) but require system updates before 1 January 2027 submissions; non-compliance risks resolution planning scrutiny, though lead time mitigates immediate pressure. Matters for maintaining accurate MREL monitoring amid PRA's FBD efficiency drive.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has fined The Bank of London Group Limited and Oplyse Holdings Limited (formerly The Bank of London Group Holdings Limited) £2 million for misleading the PRA over their capital positions, failing to act with integrity, failing to be open and cooperative with the regulator and failing to maintain adequate financial resources.
AI Analysis
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) fined The Bank of London Group Limited and its parent Oplyse Holdings Limited £2 million (reduced from £12 million due to financial hardship) for serious breaches including misleading the regulator with fabricated documents on capital positions, failing to act with integrity, lacking openness, and breaching capital and large exposure rules from October 2021 to May 2024. This marks the PRA's first enforcement for integrity failures and first action against a parent holding company, signaling heightened scrutiny on governance, reporting accuracy, and parent-subsidiary accountability in UK banking. Compliance professionals should note this as a precedent reinforcing zero tolerance for deceptive practices, with potential for escalated penalties absent settlement or hardship claims.
What Changed
This enforcement action does not introduce new rules but enforces existing PRA requirements with landmark application:
First PRA fine for breaching Fundamental Rule 1 (conduct business with integrity), highlighting fabrication of documents as a core violation.
First enforcement against a parent financial holding company (Oplyse Holdings), extending liability to group entities for capital reporting and related party exposures.
Emphasizes strict adherence to Fundamental Rules 3, 4, and 7 (prudence, adequate resources, openness), CRR reporting (e.g., own funds on individual/consolidated basis),...
What You Need To Do
Conduct capital position audits to verify CRR reporting accuracy (individual and consolidated own funds) and remediate any discrepancies
Review intra-group exposures for large exposure limits (Articles 393-395), related party transactions (Rules 2
Stress-test parent-subsidiary interactions and ensure openness with PRA on deteriorating positions
Update training on PRA enforcement policies (PS1/24) and bank supervision (SS3/21)
Key Dates
7 October 2021 - 22 May 2024Period of identified breaches, including capital non-compliance, misleading submissions, and large exposure failures.DEADLINE
March 2026.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This sets a precedent for integrity-based fines and parent company liability, risking similar actions for any firm with capital misreporting or opaque group dealings; even settled penalties were reduced only due to hardship, indicating PRA's willingness to pursue £12m+ originally. Matters critically for banks/fintechs with complex structures, as it amplifies personal accountability under Senior Managers Regime and erodes trust, potentially triggering closer PRA supervision or prohibitions.
The Prudential Regulation Authority has today published proposals aimed at ensuring banks can monetise liquid assets quickly in a fast-paced stress event – such as the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank in 2023.
AI Analysis
The PRA has launched a three-month consultation on modernized liquidity standards designed to ensure banks can rapidly convert liquid assets to cash during stress events, responding directly to lessons from the 2023 collapses of Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse. Rather than requiring banks to hold more liquid assets, the reforms focus on **operationalizing existing liquidity** through enhanced stress testing, removal of exemptions for sovereign bonds, and improved preparedness for central bank facility access.
What Changed
The consultation proposes four primary regulatory modifications:
Weekly stress testing requirement: Firms must conduct internal stress tests evaluating rapid outflows within one week, supplementing the existing monthly reporting framework
Removal of Level 1 asset exemption: Sovereign bonds and other "level 1 assets" will no longer be exempt from annual testing of monetization capability for non-liquid assets, closing a significant testing gap
Barrier identification mandate: Firms must systematically evaluate their liquidity, identify barriers to asset monetization, and document...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by April 27, 2026)
Review the full consultation document and impact assessment
Identify internal stakeholders (Treasury, Risk, Operations, Compliance) for response coordination
Assess current liquidity stress testing capabilities against proposed weekly timeframe requirement
CP5/26 is a PRA consultation paper proposing updates to the liquidity policy framework to address modern risks from digital banking, payments, and technology that can amplify liquidity stresses. It matters because it strengthens firms' resilience by emphasizing liquidity resource composition, monetisation risk, and short-term stress scenarios, ensuring firms can meet outflows in acute crises.
What Changed
Composition of liquidity resources: Revise the Overall Liquidity Adequacy Rule (OLAR) to explicitly require adequate composition (not just amount) of liquidity resources, balancing cash, non-cash assets monetisable in private markets, and central bank facilities.
Monetisation risk assessment: Replace 'marketable asset risk' with monetisation risk in ILAA rule 11.5, with detailed expectations in updated SS24/15 on market access, accounting treatment, repo/sale ability, and central bank use; includes illustrative template.
Stress scenario design: New requirement for a business model-specific...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation by 17 June 2026, indicating confidentiality and publication consent
Update internal processes
Enhance governance
Stress testing
Systems check
Key Dates
17 June 2026 - Consultation responses due(submit to CP5_26@bankofengland.co.uk or Liquidity Policy Team).
Instrument 2026).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must engage now as the 17 June 2026 response deadline is ~3 months away (today: 17 March 2026), and changes target evolving digital risks that could amplify outflows. Non-engagement risks supervisory scrutiny on ILAAP adequacy, OLAR compliance, and resilience in stresses; proportionate but requires ILAAP revisions pre-final rules.
Lenders and brokers in thesecond charge mortgagemarket need toconsiderhow theyadvise customers, assess affordability and charge fees. An FCA review has found that weaknesses in some firms’ practices could put borrowers, particularly those consolidating debt, at increased risk of financial harm.Second charge mortgages are often used by customers with high existing levels of debt and low financial resilience. The FCA’s review found examples of good practice across the sector but also issues tha...
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has imposed a financial penalty of £10,625,000 on U K Insurance Limited (UKI Limited) in connection with a miscalculation of their Solvency II balance sheet during 2023 and 2024.
AI Analysis
The PRA fined U K Insurance Limited (UKI Limited) £10.625 million (reduced from £21.25 million via 50% Early Account Scheme discount) for breaching Solvency II reporting rules due to a miscalculation overstating its solvency balance sheet in 2023-2024, stemming from ineffective controls and resourcing in finance/actuarial functions. This landmark case highlights PRA's emphasis on accurate prudential reporting and rewards early self-reporting/cooperation, signaling heightened enforcement scrutiny on insurers' control frameworks. It matters as it demonstrates PRA's use of the EAS for efficiency and underscores risks of control failures undermining supervisory effectiveness.
What Changed
No new regulatory rules or requirements are introduced; this is an enforcement action applying existing PRA rules. Key breaches include:
PRA Fundamental Rule 6: Failure to organise/control affairs responsibly/effectively due to ineffective preventative/detective controls and resourcing issues.
Notifications Rule 6.1: Information to PRA not factually accurate or complete.
Reporting Rules 2.4 and 3.2: Submissions lacked completeness, reliability, and compliance with SFCR structure/principles.
This is the first EAS application, per PRA's enforcement approach (pages 33-39 of November 2024...
What You Need To Do
Conduct control reviews
Test reporting accuracy
Leverage EAS
Remediate proactively
Document governance
Key Dates
2023-2024Relevant period of miscalculation and breaches.
13 August 2024Firm notified PRA of error with preliminary root cause analysis.
23 August 2024Public disclosure via Regulatory News Service on SCR Coverage Ratio impact.
1 July 2025Aviva acquired DLG/UKI Limited (events pre-date).
10 March 2026PRA issued Final Notice and imposed penalty.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This enforcement validates PRA's zero-tolerance for solvency misreporting, risking supervisory misjudgment and policyholder threats; firms face similar fines without EAS discounts. It amplifies 2026 priorities on internal models, data quality, and controls amid softening markets/BPA pressures, demanding immediate control audits to avoid escalation.
PS6/26 finalizes the PRA's policy on recognized exchanges (REs) under Article 4(1)(72)(c) of the UK CRR, shifting responsibility to firms for assessing exchange and asset liquidity conditions while restating main indices in the PRA Rulebook and revoking SS20/13. This matters for PRA-regulated firms as it enables more dynamic, risk-sensitive capital treatments for traded assets, potentially expanding eligible REs and supporting competitiveness without PRA pre-approval.
What Changed
New Recognised Exchanges (CRR) Part in the PRA Rulebook: Specifies conditions for REs focusing on (i) exchange/market structure risk (e.g., operational robustness of clearing/settlement) and (ii) asset liquidity risk; firms must assess and document compliance.
Restatement of main indices: List from Commission Implementing Regulation 2016/1646 moved to PRA Glossary without policy changes.
Amendment to 'higher risk equity exposure' definition: Aligns with Basel 3.1 near-final rules, excluding qualifying listed equities from higher risk weights under the standardized approach (ties to exchange...
What You Need To Do
Assess exchanges/assets
Update policies/systems
Review exposures
Key Dates
18 June 2025- Consultation deadline for CP3/25 (closed; feedback incorporated in PS6/26).DEADLINE
1 July 2026- Implementation date for new RE rules, main indices restatement, SS20/13 revocation, and related Rulebook amendments.
1 January 2027- Proposed implementation for Basel 3.1 changes, including higher risk equity exposure amendments (alongside broader standards).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective 1 July 2026 (approx. 4 months from now), requiring immediate gap analysis, policy updates, and assessor training to avoid capital miscalculations or supervisory findings. Impacts prudential calculations directly, with flexibility reducing PRA burden but increasing firm accountability and review risks.
The latest report from the Office for Professional Body Anti-Money Laundering Supervision (OPBAS) finds there is still room for improvement. The anti-money laundering supervisors of professional services firms are more effective than at any time since 2018. However, OPBAS remains concerned that their enforcement lacks the teeth to deter firms from falling short of minimum standards.OPBAS’s latest report found Professional Body Supervisors (PBSs) generally continue to demonstrate good levels o...
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
Katharine Braddick CB appointed as the next Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England and Chief Executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, succeeding Sam Woods when his term ends in June 2026.
This statement provides an early indication to industry of the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) intent to launch the next Life Insurance Stress Test (LIST) exercise in January 2028.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
CP4/26 proposes targeted amendments to UK Solvency II own funds rules in the PRA Rulebook, addressing inconsistencies, clarifying requirements, and restating EU guidelines for better accessibility. These updates matter as they reduce regulatory burden, enhance clarity, and align rules with market practices, supporting PRA objectives of firm safety, policyholder protection, and competitiveness without introducing new risks.
What Changed
Amendments to prior permission requirements for repaying or redeeming Tier 1 and Tier 3 own funds instruments, clarifying application to items classified under own funds permissions.
Clarification that Tier 2 basic own funds items can cover 20% of the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR), while Tier 2 Ancillary Own Funds cannot.
Requirement that both minimum maturity date and first contractual opportunity to redeem must be met for Tier 1 and Tier 2 basic own funds classification.
Correction to reconciliation reserve calculation to avoid canceling eligible own funds increases from classification...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation by 24 April 2026 via email to CP4_26@bankofengland
Assess current own funds instruments against proposed clarifications (e
Evaluate reconciliation reserve calculations for potential adjustments post-permission grants
Engage PRA on concurrent transactions (e
Prepare for Rulebook updates by mapping impacts to Own Funds, Reporting, Group Supervision, Glossary, and SCR Standard Formula parts
Key Dates
24 April 2026- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
2026 H2- Publication of dedicated policy statement (PS) with effective date for remaining changes.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Proposals are refinements and clarifications rather than new burdens, with modest impacts focused on error corrections and alignment with practices; however, they affect core own funds calculations critical for solvency, requiring review before H2 2026 implementation to avoid misclassifications or PRA engagement delays.
PRA Policy Statement PS5/26 finalizes rules permitting UK credit unions to invest in Credit Union Service Organisations (CUSOs), expanding from the CP13/25 proposals to foster innovation, collaboration, and growth while managing prudential risks through safeguards like due diligence and investment caps. This matters as it enables credit unions—often smaller mutuals—to access shared services (e.g., HR, IT, compliance) via CUSOs, leveling the playing field against larger competitors and supporting the PRA's safety/soundness and competitiveness objectives.
What Changed
Investment permission and cap increase: Credit unions can now invest in CUSOs using own capital, with the cap raised from 5% to 7.5% of total capital across all CUSOs (clarifications added on practical application, e.g., aggregation).
Expanded CUSO scope: CUSOs can now serve other UK-regulated mutuals (with Part 4A permission) beyond just credit unions; partnerships with non-credit unions permitted as owners, subject to safeguards.
Supervisory expectations in SS2/23: New chapter requires due diligence, risk analysis, limited liability to investment amount, legal/operational separation,...
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Ensure structural safeguards
Governance alignment
Implementation planning
Reporting/oversight
Key Dates
24 October 2025- Consultation response deadline for CP13/25.DEADLINE
20 February 2026- Publication date of PS5/26 (final policy).
~20 August 2026- Implementation deadline for SS2/23 CUSO expectations (six months from PS5/26 publication).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Credit unions eyeing CUSOs for growth (e.g., shared services) must act promptly within the six-month window to avoid supervisory breaches, as this expands opportunities but introduces new prudential risks (e.g., ownership misalignment, capital exposure). Non-compliance risks heightened PRA scrutiny, especially post-PS26/25 mutual sector review; benefits justify costs only for opt-in firms, but proactive preparation ensures safety/soundness.
The PRA's CP3/26 proposes rule amendments to align its Rulebook with HM Treasury's (HMT) Overseas Prudential Requirements Regime (OPRR), which restates and modifies existing CRR equivalence provisions for treating overseas entities' exposures as preferential "exposures to institutions." This matters for **PRA-authorised firms** as it clarifies capital treatment for cross-border exposures, reduces interpretive burdens, and ensures consistency post-Brexit, advancing the PRA's safety and soundness objective while facilitating HMT designations.
What Changed
Credit Risk Standardised Approach (SA): Exposures to overseas credit institutions, investment firms, or exchanges treated as "exposures to institutions" only if from UK or HMT-designated OPRR jurisdictions; deletes CRR Article 119(5) for investment firms under Part 9C rules.
IRB Approach: Preserves CRR Article 107(3) effect by aligning exposure class allocation with SA's updated "exposures to institutions" concept.
Large Exposures: Amends Rule 1.3 definition of "institution" to limit preferential treatment to UK or OPRR-designated overseas entities.
General Scope: Applies changes across PRA...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation by 2 April 2026, indicating consent for name/organisation publication and any confidentiality claims
Assess current exposures to overseas institutions/exchanges against proposed OPRR criteria; model impacts on capital requirements under SA, IRB, and large exposures rules
Update internal policies on exposure classification once final rules published; monitor HMT OPRR designations for affected jurisdictions
Indicate response as individual or organisational; personal data handled per Bank of England privacy notice
Key Dates
Thursday 2 April 2026- Consultation response deadline; submit to CP3_26@bankofengland.co.uk or PRA at 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must engage promptly on consultation (deadline ~10 weeks from publication) to influence outcomes; changes clarify but could increase capital for non-designated overseas exposures, impacting safety/soundness and competitiveness. Failure to adapt risks non-compliance with updated Rulebook and higher prudential burdens.
The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA's decisions to ban Stephen Joseph Burdett and James Paul Goodchild from working in financial services. Mr Burdett and Mr Goodchild previously held senior roles at Synergy Wealth Limited (Synergy) and Westbury Private Clients LLP (Westbury), respectively.The FCA banned the pair from working in regulated financial services for recklessly exposing pension holders to unsuitable investments.The Tribunal also found that it was appropriate for the FCA to impose ...
CP2/26 is a PRA consultation paper proposing targeted reforms to UK securitisation rules to reduce prescriptiveness and burden while maintaining prudential soundness, building on recent CRR restatements. It matters for compliance professionals as it streamlines due diligence, risk retention, disclosures, and capital treatments, potentially lowering costs for PRA-authorised firms in the securitisation market amid Basel 3.1 implementation. These changes aim to enhance proportionality without compromising investor protection or oversight.
What Changed
The proposals amend PRA rules and supervisory guidance in the Securitisation Part of the PRA Rulebook, including:
Due diligence: Remove prescriptive verification of credit-granting criteria (Chapter 2 Article 9), risk retention (Chapter 2 Article 6 and Chapter 4), STS criteria, specific information availability, ongoing monitoring lists, stress testing, internal reporting to management, and demonstration of understanding to PRA; replace with proportionate consideration of credit-granting standards.
Risk retention: Introduce a new combined modality merging two existing ones.
Market disclosure...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond
Gap analysis
Coordinate with FCA
Policy updates
Monitor legislation
Key Dates
18 May 2026- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
1 January 2027- Expected implementation aligning with Basel 3.1 and CRR restatement (PS3/26), with transitional arrangements to 2030.
Post-SI (TBD)- Changes to repository requirements effective upon HM Treasury Statutory Instrument amending UK Securitisation Regulation 2024.
1 January 2026- Related CRR/Solvency II restatement (PS12/25) already effective, preserving core securitisation requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Proposals reduce burden (e.g., less prescriptive due diligence, streamlined disclosures) but require immediate review ahead of 18 May 2026 deadline and 1 January 2027 implementation, aligning with Basel 3.1. Non-response risks misaligned systems during CRR restatement transition; benefits include cost savings and proportionality, but firms must validate ongoing compliance with retained prudential standards.
The Bank of England held roundtable meetings with representatives from regulated firms on the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI and ML), to better understand the constraints that firms may be facing.
The Market Participants Group (MPG) is a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
This article provides an update regarding implementing changes for country grouping conventions used in statistics covering the international business of monetary financial institutions operating in the UK and the consolidated claims of UK headquartered monetary financial institutions.
The PRA's DP1/26 outlines its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, reviewing strategic regulatory reporting for banks to reduce costs, enhance data quality, timeliness, and relevance, while aligning with its secondary competitiveness and growth objective. This discussion paper seeks industry feedback on pragmatic, incremental reforms to reporting templates, processes, and principles, balancing supervisory needs with proportionality. It matters for compliance teams as it signals potential simplifications in data submissions, but requires proactive engagement to influence outcomes and prepare for evolving requirements.
What Changed
DP1/26 proposes no immediate binding changes, as it is a discussion paper seeking views rather than a consultation with firm rules. Key elements include:
Incremental reforms: Extending recent template deletions (e.g., from Strong and Simple initiative for liquidity returns in small banks) to wider collections, aiming for cost reductions estimated at £26 million annually from prior cuts.
Guiding principles: Four principles to shape FBD: (i) anchor data in PRA objectives; (ii) collect data 'once and well' (minimize volume, maximize use); (iii) ease firm supply processes; (iv) ensure ongoing...
What You Need To Do
Submit responses
Review and assess impact
Engage proactively
Prepare internally
Key Dates
5 May 2026- Deadline for responses to DP1/26.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Not critical, as no immediate rules or deadlines beyond response submission (3+ months away from 5 Feb 2026). Matters for strategic planning: signals cost reductions but requires input to avoid unfavorable changes; aligns with PRA's 2026 priorities on data accuracy/quality (e.g., for risk reporting, stress testing). Firms with high reporting burdens should prioritize to influence simplifications and mitigate risks from evolving data needs (e.g., emerging risks, AI).
In October 2025, 25 financial institutions active in the UK foreign exchange (FX) market participated in the semi-annual turnover survey for the Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC).
The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA’s decision that Rangecourt SA (formerly Banque Havilland), Edmund Rowland, the former London CEO and Vladimir Bolelyy, a former Bank employee, acted without integrity. The Tribunal agreed with the FCA that significant fines should be imposed, deciding that fines of £4m, £352,000 and £14,200 were appropriate for Rangecourt SA, Mr Rowland and Mr Bolelyy respectively. The Tribunal also upheld the FCA’s decision to ban Mr Rowland and Mr Bolelyy from working i...
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have announced the first cohort of banks and building societies to benefit from their joint Scale-up Unit. The Scale-up Unit announced last year is designed to build stronger ties and provide tailored support for fast-growing and innovative financial firms, helping them to grow sustainably at pace.The 6 firms that expressed interest and have been accepted to the first cohort are:Allica BankClearBankMonument BankNo...
The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority have announced the first cohort of banks and building societies to benefit from their joint Scale-up Unit.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
On 21 January 2026, Guavapay Limited entered compulsory liquidation. The Official Receiver, an officer of the Insolvency Service, is its liquidator. Guavapay is authorised by the FCA to issue E-money and provide payment services to its customers.On 17 September 2025, Guavapay agreed to a voluntary requirement with the FCA, restricting the activities it can undertake. See details on the Financial Services Register.As liquidator, The Official Receiver is responsible for:Managing customer claims...
CP25/15 proposes prudential rules and guidance for UK firms issuing **qualifying stablecoins** and safeguarding **qualifying cryptoassets**, aiming to foster a safe, competitive crypto sector while prioritizing consumer protection and market integrity. This matters for compliance professionals as it introduces tailored prudential sourcebooks (COREPRU and CRYPTOPRU) to mitigate firm failure risks, aligning with the FCA's crypto roadmap and Treasury's statutory plans.
What Changed
Prudential Sourcebooks: Introduces COREPRU (core requirements across sectors) and CRYPTOPRU (crypto-specific calibrations) for "CRYPTOPRU firms" handling regulated crypto activities, covering own funds adequacy, capital resources, and stress-adjusted internal capital assessments.
Own Funds and Capital Rules: Firms must hold financial resources adequate in amount and quality, including adjustments for valuation uncertainty, stress realizable values, and interim profits in CET1 capital; supplements threshold conditions and principles requiring appropriate resources.
Risk Management and...
What You Need To Do
Respond to Consultation
Assess Applicability
Prepare Prudential Frameworks
Engage on Related CPs
Data and Reporting Readiness
Key Dates
28/05/2025- Consultation opens and CP first published.
31/07/2025- Consultation closes; submit feedback via online form, email ([email protected]), or post.
Post-31/07/2025- FCA considers feedback and publishes final rules (no specific date given).
Q3 2025- Upcoming Conduct and Firm Standards CP affecting all cryptoasset firms, including QS issuers and custodians.
Future (CP2 per Roadmap)- Consultation on remaining prudential sourcebook requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – As of January 2026, the consultation closed over five months ago, signaling imminent final rules that could reshape prudential requirements for crypto firms; non-compliance risks authorization barriers, enforcement, or market exclusion in a regime prioritizing stability amid global crypto growth. This elevates risks for firm failures and consumer harm, demanding immediate gap assessments to align with proportionate standards supporting innovation.
The FCA and PRA are consulting on setting the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) at £113 million for 2026/27, comprising a £108 million management expenses budget (up £4.4 million from 2025/26, broadly in line with inflation) and a £5 million unlevied reserve. This matters because it caps the operating costs (e.g., IT, staff, legal, claims handling) that FCA- and PRA-authorised firms must fund via levies, excluding separate compensation payments, ensuring FSCS efficiency while controlling firm burdens.
What Changed
Proposed MELL of £113 million for 2026/27: £108 million budget + £5 million unlevied reserve.
Budget increase of £4.4 million (4%) from 2025/26, aligned with inflation; excluding new revolving credit facility (RCF) enhancement costs, it reflects a £6.6 million nominal and £11 million real-terms reduction on a like-for-like basis.
Budget allocated across PRA and FCA fee blocks based on firms' regulated business volume, with smaller firms contributing less.
No changes to compensation levies, which remain separate and forecast at £342 million total levy including compensation.
What You Need To Do
Review CP26/2 (FCA) and CP1/26 (PRA) alongside FSCS January 2026 Budget Update for allocation details
Submit feedback on proposed MELL by 10 February 2026 to PRA (email or 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA)
Budget for potential levy payments starting 1 April 2026, based on firm's share of PRA/FCA classes (see Appendix 4 in CP)
Monitor post-consultation Policy Statement/Handbook Notice for final MELL confirmation
Key Dates
13 January 2026- Consultation opens (CP26/2 FCA; CP1/26 PRA).
10 February 2026- Consultation closes; submit comments via email or post to PRA (accepted on behalf of both regulators, shared anonymously with FSCS).
1 April 2026- Final rules effective (start of FSCS financial year); PRA Policy Statement and FCA Handbook Notice expected post-consultation.
31 March 2027- MELL period ends.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Firms face predictable levy increases aligned with inflation, with levies allocated by business volume (minimal for small firms), but must act on consultation feedback by 10 February 2026 (today is 25 January 2026, leaving ~2 weeks). Matters for financial planning and budgeting, as MELL ensures FSCS operational funding without covering volatile compensation costs; failure to engage risks unaddressed cost concerns in final rules.
PS1/26 represents the UK Prudential Regulation Authority's final implementation framework for the Basel 3.1 international banking standards, effective 1 January 2027 (with market risk internal models delayed to 1 January 2028). This policy statement establishes mandatory capital, credit risk, operational risk, and market risk requirements for UK-regulated banks, building societies, and investment firms, addressing post-financial crisis shortcomings in risk-weighted asset (RWA) calculations and capital adequacy frameworks.
What Changed
*Credit Risk Framework**
Implementation of restrictions on Internal Ratings-Based (IRB) approach scope, effective 1 January 2027, with firms required to reclassify certain exposures (e.g., slotting approach IPRE exposures) as High-Volatility Commercial Real Estate (HVCRE) where applicable.
Minor clarifications and amendments to the Standardised Approach and credit risk mitigation techniques.
*Operational Risk**
Updated Business Indicator Component (BIC) calculation methodology requiring inclusion of the current financial year in the three-year average calculation (or an estimate if...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by mid-2026)
*Conduct impact assessment
*Review IRB permissions
*Assess FRTB-IMA readiness
*Arrange board-level assurance
Key Dates
20 January 2026– PRA publishes PS1/26 (final rules)
1 January 2027– Effective date for Basel 3.1 implementation (credit risk, operational risk, reporting/disclosure, IRB scope restrictions, SDDT regime)
1 January 2027– Interim period begins for FRTB-IMA transition; existing IMA permissions retained; out-of-scope positions move to ASA/SSA
1 January 2028– FRTB-IMA implementation effective date
2026 ICAAP submission deadline– Must include Basel 3.1/SDDT impact assessmentDEADLINE
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the final rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards in the UK, with an effective date of January 1, 2027. The rules aim to enhance the resilience of banks and improve the stability of the financial system. Firms must review and update their policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new requirements.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced new rules for the calculation of risk-weighted assets, including changes to the credit risk standardised approach, market risk framework, and operational risk requirements. The rules also include amendments to the definitions of probability of default, loss given default, and conversion factor.
What You Need To Do
Review and update credit risk policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the new standardised approach
Assess the impact of the new market risk framework on trading book positions and capital requirements
Update operational risk management frameworks to reflect changes to the Business Indicator and subcomponents
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027Basel 3.1 rules take effectDEADLINE
1 Jan 2028Internal model approach for market risk takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Non-compliance with the new rules may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
The PRA's PS2/26 finalizes the retirement of the "refined methodology" in Pillar 2A capital requirements, effective 1 January 2027, aligning with Basel 3.1 implementation to simplify the framework by eliminating an operationally burdensome adjustment originally designed to address conservatism in the standardized approach (SA) to credit risk. This matters for compliance professionals as it reduces complexity in ICAAP and SREP processes, with expected neutral aggregate capital impact, though firm-specific effects may vary and require supervisory engagement.
What Changed
Retirement of refined methodology: The refined methodology, introduced in 2018 (PS22/17) to mitigate perceived conservatism in CR SA relative to IRB for lower-risk assets, is fully retired from Pillar 2A as Basel 3.1 CR SA enhancements achieve similar risk sensitivity without it. No transitional period; immediate replacement by Basel 3.1 standards.
Amendments to SS31/15: Updates to Supervisory Statement 31/15 on ICAAP and SREP (Appendix 1), including minor prior adjustment to paragraph 5.12A for SDDTs reflecting no need for Interim Capital Regime (ICR).
No further changes from near-final:...
What You Need To Do
Review and update ICAAP/SREP processes
Recalculate Pillar 2A requirements
Align with related frameworks
Monitor firm-specific impacts
Governance and reporting
Key Dates
2024CP9/24 consultation on streamlining Pillar 2A, including proposal to retire refined methodology.
28 October 2025PS18/25 near-final policy published.
20 January 2026PS2/26 final policy published.
1 January 2027Effective date for retirement of refined methodology; aligns with Basel 3.1 implementation (PS1/26), CRR restatement (PS3/26), and SDDT simplified regime (PS4/26).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With less than 11 months to 1 January 2027 effective date (as of January 2026 publication), firms face immediate need to remodel Pillar 2A under Basel 3.1, potentially affecting capital planning, stress testing, and regulatory reporting. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny during SREP; benefits include workload simplification, but SA-only firms must validate no undue conservatism gaps versus IRB peers.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has finalized the policy to retire the refined methodology to Pillar 2A, which will take effect on January 1, 2027, aligning with the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standards. This change affects all PRA-regulated banks, building societies, and designated investment firms. The refined methodology will no longer apply to these firms, including Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), as they will be subject to the Basel 3.1 standardized approach to credit risk.
What Changed
The PRA has retired the refined methodology to Pillar 2A, which was previously used to determine capital requirements for firms. The new policy aligns with the Basel 3.1 standards and introduces a simplified capital regime for SDDTs.
What You Need To Do
Update internal capital adequacy assessment processes (ICAAP) to reflect the changes to Pillar 2A
Review and implement the Basel 3.1 standardized approach to credit risk
Ensure compliance with the new simplified capital regime for SDDTs, if applicable
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The policy to retire the refined methodology to Pillar 2A takes effect, aligning with the implementation of the Basel 3.1 standardsDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the new policy may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
PS3/26 is the PRA's final policy statement restating the remaining provisions of the UK Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) into the PRA Rulebook and related policy materials, effective 1 January 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, consolidating fragmented regulatory requirements into a unified domestic framework while introducing targeted amendments to securitisation rules and External Credit Assessment Institution (ECAI) mapping.
What Changed
*Restatement of CRR Provisions**
The PRA is transferring remaining CRR requirements from the UK CRR into the PRA Rulebook without material changes to policy substance, except for targeted securitisation amendments. This follows the earlier PS12/25, which finalised the first tranche of restatement requirements in 2026.
*Policy Materials and Supervisory Guidance
PS3/26 introduces or amends multiple supervisory statements and statements of policy:
New: SS4/24 (Credit risk: Internal Ratings Based Approach), SS3/24 (Credit risk definition of default), SoP6/25 (Internal Model Method permissions),...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by Q2 2026)
*Review applicability
*Assess impact
*Identify policy changes
*Medium-term (by Q3 2026)
Key Dates
20 January 2026- PS3/26 final policy statement published
28 October 2025- PS19/25 (near-final policy) published
1 January 2027- All policies take effect; HM Treasury commencement regulations revoke relevant CRR provisions and replace them with PRA Rulebook rules and policy materials
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published a policy statement (PS3/26) that restates the remaining relevant provisions in the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials. This change aims to ensure that the PRA's rules and policies are consistent with the UK's withdrawal from the EU. The policy statement is relevant to PRA-authorised banks, building societies, and other financial institutions.
What Changed
The PRA has restated the remaining relevant provisions in the CRR within the PRA Rulebook and other policy materials, including amendments to supervisory statements and the introduction of new statements of policy. The changes include updates to the securitisation requirements and the introduction of new rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches.
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the restated CRR provisions
Ensure that risk management practices are aligned with the updated rules on credit risk and internal ratings-based approaches
Review and update securitisation policies and procedures to ensure compliance with the amended requirements
Key Dates
1 Jan 2027The restated CRR provisions take effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Failure to comply with the restated CRR provisions may result in enforcement action, fines, or other regulatory penalties
Related Regulations
Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR)Basel 3.1Solvency II
PS4/26 finalizes the **simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)**, a tailored prudential framework designed to reduce regulatory burden while maintaining capital resilience for smaller, domestically-focused UK banks and building societies. This represents the completion of Phase 1 of the PRA's "Strong and Simple" initiative and introduces materially lighter capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements for qualifying firms, with implementation effective January 1, 2027.
What Changed
*Simplified Capital Framework
The final policy introduces a dedicated capital regime** for SDDTs that descopes them from standard CRR Firms requirements. SDDTs are now subject to tailored Pillar 2 methodologies (SoP5/25) and simplified ICAAP/SREP processes (SS4/25) rather than the standard frameworks.
*Liquidity Simplifications
Qualifying SDDTs with 50% or more retail deposit funding** are exempted from the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) requirements, replacing this with a simpler Retail Deposit Ratio (RDR) measure.
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by January 20, 2026)
*Assess SDDT eligibility – Determine whether your firm meets all seven qualification criteria, particularly the £20bn asset threshold and domestic asset location requirement
*Review consolidation group structure – If part of a group, confirm which entity will serve as the SDDT consolidation entity responsible for certification
*Implement SoP2/23 changes – Adopt updated operating procedures for the SDDT regime
*Update ICAAP/ILAAP processes – Implement new frequency requirements for capital and liquidity adequacy assessments
Key Dates
January 20, 2026– PS4/26 published; changes to SoP2/23 and ICAAP/ILAAP frequency requirements take effect
January 20, 2026– Revocation of ICR firm/consolidation entity definitions and deletion of SoP3/23 effective
January 1, 2027– Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes effect; SS4/25 brought into effect in full; SDDTs removed from SS31/15 scope
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has introduced a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) to reduce regulatory complexity while maintaining adequate capital. The new regime will take effect on 2027-01-01. This change aims to simplify capital requirements for smaller banks and building societies.
What Changed
The PRA has introduced a new simplified capital regime for SDDTs, which includes changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy. The regime also introduces new reporting templates and instructions.
What You Need To Do
Review and update capital adequacy assessments to ensure compliance with the new simplified capital regime
Implement new reporting templates and instructions for SDDTs
Update internal policies and procedures to reflect changes to the PRA Rulebook, supervisory statements, and statements of policy
Key Dates
20 Jan 2026Publication of the final policy statement
20 Jan 2026Early implementation of changes to ICAAP updates and reverse stress-testing
1 Jan 2027The SDDT capital regime takes effectDEADLINE
Non-Compliance Risk
Enforcement action, fines, or license revocation for non-compliance with the new simplified capital regime
The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him £2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal. The FCA's decision to ban Darren Antony Reynolds from working in financial services and fine him £2,037,892 has been upheld by the Upper Tribunal.Mr Reynolds was dishonest when he gave pension transfer advice and investment recommendations to his customers, causing them significant harm.Mr Reynolds showed a clear disregard for his customers’ intere...
On 16 January 2026, Logic Investments Ltd (Logic Investments) entered special administration. Alex Watkins and Ed Boyle of Interpath Ltd were appointed as joint special administrators. Logic Investments is FCA authorised and regulated to provide wealth management services. On 16 December 2025, Logic Investments agreed to an FCA requirement preventing it from accepting new clients, client money or assets; or moving existing client money or assets without FCA consent. This was done because of c...
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has today published its supervisory priorities for 2026, outlining in a letter its sector-specific priorities for the coming year to all banks, building societies, insurers and other PRA-regulated firms.
The Financial Conduct Authority, Bank of England and Prudential Regulation Authority (UK regulators) have together signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the European Supervisory Authorities to enhance cooperation and oversight of critical third parties (CTPs) that fall under the UK’s CTP regime.
The PRA and FCA have jointly issued consultation paper CP1/26 proposing to set the **Management Expenses Levy Limit (MELL) for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) at £113 million for 2026/27**, comprising a £108 million management expenses budget and a £5 million unlevied reserve. This consultation determines the maximum amount the FSCS can levy on authorised financial services firms to fund its statutory compensation scheme operations, directly affecting compliance costs for all regulated entities.
What Changed
The proposed MELL for 2026/27 introduces the following material changes:
Budget increase of £4.4 million from 2025/26 (from approximately £103.6 million to £108 million), broadly aligned with inflation
Nominal reduction of £6.6 million on a like-for-like basis when excluding the cost of enhancements to the FSCS's revolving credit facility (RCF)
Real terms reduction of £11 million when accounting for inflation adjustments
RCF enhancement to £3 billion to support the Bank of England's recapitalisation powers and enable faster depositor payouts
Unlevied reserve maintained at £5 million to...
What You Need To Do
*Review the consultation paper (CP1/26) in detail, particularly Appendices 3 and 4 detailing budget line items and PRA/FCA funding class allocations
*Assess levy impact on your firm's 2026/27 budget based on your regulated business volume and funding class allocation
*Prepare internal stakeholder communication regarding the £4
*Monitor the FSCS January 2026 budget update for detailed cost breakdowns and compensation levy forecasts
*Submit consultation responses if your firm wishes to comment on the proposal by 10 February 2026
Key Dates
10 February 2026– Consultation deadline for comments on CP1/26DEADLINE
1 April 2026– Effective date: proposed MELL applies from start of FSCS financial year
We reviewed how firms sell complex exchange traded products (ETPs) to retail consumers. Complex ETPs are a subset of the wider ETP market and include high-risk investment strategies that can be difficult for retail consumers to understand.We assessed how firms of different sizes and business models evaluate these products, communicate key risks and monitor outcomes under the Consumer Duty.Given the complexity and risk profile of ETPs, it is essential firms make sure investors have the knowled...
The FCA has secured a confiscation order of £265,523.96 against Andrew Currie. Mr Currie was convicted in 2023 and sentenced to 2 years 6 months imprisonment for defrauding investors through the collapsed peer-to-peer lending platform Collateral (UK) Ltd.He diverted funds from Collateral investors and used them for personal gain, including the purchase of a property in Spain.At a hearing at Southwark Crown Court on 9 January 2026, Mr Currie was ordered to pay £265,523.96. This amount represen...
This Market Notice sets out amendment to the schedule for sales in Q1 2026 of gilts held in the Asset Purchase Facility (APF) for monetary policy purposes.
Statistical Notices update the definitions and guidance contained in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder
AI Analysis
This Statistical Notice 2026/01 from the Bank of England specifies the submission deadline for the Eligible Liabilities Return form, which calculates firms' contributions to the Bank of England Levy for the 2026/27 levy year. It matters because non-compliance risks penalties, late fees, or enforcement actions under the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013, ensuring timely funding for the Bank's resolution and stability functions. Compliance teams must integrate this into levy reporting calendars to avoid operational disruptions.
What Changed
The notice updates definitions and guidance in the Banking Statistics Yellow Folder, focusing on the deadline for submitting the Eligible Liabilities Return (ELR) form for the 2026/27 levy year. It does not introduce new substantive rules but reinforces procedural requirements for accurate levy base calculations, such as eligible liabilities as defined in section 15 of the Financial Services (Banking Reform) Act 2013. No specific changes to levy rates or methodologies are detailed, but it aligns with ongoing updates to banking statistics reporting.
What You Need To Do
Review and calculate eligible liabilities as of 31 December 2026 using BoE definitions from the Yellow Folder
Submit completed ELR form electronically via BoE portal by the specified deadline (likely 31 January 2027)
Retain audit trails, supporting data, and reconciliations for potential PRA/BoE queries
Update internal systems and controls for levy calculation; notify compliance teams if data gaps exist
Monitor BoE portal for form updates or extensions
Key Dates
31 January 2027- Deadline for submission of Eligible Liabilities Return form for Levy Year 2026/27 (inferred as standard end-January deadline post-levy year-end, aligned with historical BoE notices; confirm via Yellow Folder for exact day).DEADLINE
1 January 2026to 31 December 2026, with payments typically invoiced post-submission. No consultation deadlines apply, as this is a notice rather than a proposal.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Missing the submission deadline triggers automatic late penalties (e.g., interest at Bank Rate + 5%) and potential supervisory referrals. This directly impacts prudential reporting obligations, with firms facing cash flow hits from levy payments (historically £200-300m total annually). Prioritize in Q4 2026 planning, as it coincides with year-end reporting under Basel 3.1 transitions.
On 12 November the PRA hosted a roundtable meeting with Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) of systemically important firms operating in the UK, to discuss Future Banking Data (FBD).
The FCA has fined 2 former finance directors for their part in misleading statements being issued by Carillion plc. Richard Adam and Zafar Khan were both aware of serious financial troubles in Carillion’s UK construction business but failed to reflect this in company announcements or alert the Board and audit committee, leading to poor oversight.Mr Adam and Mr Khan have been fined £232,800 and £138,900, respectively. The fines were imposed after Mr Adam and Mr Khan withdrew their challenges t...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Berne Financial Services Agreement (BFSA) is a mutual recognition agreement between the UK and Switzerland, effective from 1 January 2026. This agreement enhances cross-border market access for financial services between the two countries.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
The FCA has removed all regulatory permissions from Verus Financial Services Limited requiring it to stop conducting all regulated activities and imposed a more stringent assets restriction. The action follows concerns that the firm has repeatedly breached an existing asset restriction, which prevented it from selling, transferring or diminishing its assets without our approval. It also failed to comply with a Financial Ombudsman Service decision. We issued a First Supervisory Notice (PDF) on...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
Supervisory Statement SS2/25 from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) provides guidance on prudential considerations for UK insurance and reinsurance undertakings transferring risk to Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs). It clarifies expectations for ensuring such transfers comply with Solvency II requirements, focusing on risk transfer validity, capital relief recognition, and supervisory approval processes. This matters because it aims to enhance transparency and risk management in reinsurance arrangements, reducing potential regulatory arbitrage while supporting efficient risk mitigation for insurers amid evolving market dynamics.
What Changed
Risk Transfer Validation: Firms must demonstrate that SPV risk transfers provide genuine economic risk transfer (ERT), not just accounting or regulatory capital relief, with PRA emphasizing substance over form (e.g., no "orphan" SPVs without genuine third-party capital).
Capital Relief Criteria: Introduces stricter tests for recognizing capital relief, including full collateralization requirements, independent third-party guarantees, and prohibitions on circular reinsurance structures where the cedent retains excessive risk.
Governance and Documentation: Mandates robust board-level oversight,...
What You Need To Do
Immediate Review (by Q1 2026)
Governance Updates
Pre-Transaction Processes
Reporting Enhancements
Remediation
Key Dates
July 2025Publication date of SS2/25.
31 December 2025End of consultation period (feedback due on draft issued earlier in 2025).DEADLINE
1 January 2027Effective date for new SPV risk transfers; all material transactions post this date require PRA pre-notification.
30 June 2027Deadline for firms to review and remediate existing SPV arrangements for compliance (with phased reporting starting Q1 2027).DEADLINE
from 2027.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This is not a full regime shift but imposes immediate review obligations on firms with SPV exposure (estimated 20-30% of PRA-regulated insurers). Non-compliance risks capital add-ons, transaction disapprovals, or enforcement under PRA's Fundamental Rules, especially as PRA ramps up thematic supervision post-2025. Matters for capital efficiency in a high-interest-rate environment where SPVs are popular for cat risk.
Provisional dates for Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) announcements on Bank Rate and publication of MPC meeting minutes and the quarterly Monetary Policy Report.
We’re seeking feedback on whether tailored market risk rules for non-bank trading firms could remove unnecessary barriers, free up capital and attract new market participants, ultimately supporting economic growth. The rules in place today were originally designed for banks to ensure they held enough capital to absorb major trading losses and protect depositors.While that approach is sensible, it means non-bank trading firms face the same standards even though the potential harm from their fa...
First-time buyers and the self-employed could get a step-up onto the housing ladder, under new plans from the FCA. Its priorities for reforms to the mortgage market also include helping homeowners unlock housing wealth for a more comfortable later life.The FCA will focus on 4 areas:First-time buyers & underserved consumers: Simplifying mortgage rules to allow more flexible products that reflect different working patterns and income levels at different stages of life.Later-life lending: Review...
Given at the 20th High-level meeting on financial stability and regulatory and supervisory priorities (jointly organised by the Arab Monetary Fund, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and the Financial Stability Institute of the Bank of International Settlements).
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
PS27/25 finalizes the PRA's policy to delete 37 redundant banking regulatory reporting templates (34 FINREP, 2 COREP, and PRA109) as the first phase of the Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, aiming to reduce reporting burdens while maintaining supervisory data quality. This matters for PRA-regulated banks as it delivers immediate cost savings and signals broader regulatory simplification, aligning with the PRA's secondary competitiveness and growth objective.
What Changed
Deletion of 37 whole reporting templates identified as duplicative, outdated, or low-value: 34 FINREP templates, 2 COREP templates (C05.01 and C05.02, now obsolete), and PRA109.
Consolidation of remaining FINREP scoping provisions into a single section of the PRA Rulebook (new Chapters 5A–5F of the Reporting (CRR) Part), with clarifications to unclear or duplicative conditions.
Alignment of FINREP remittance deadlines to 30 business days for reports under Article 430(3), Article 11(2), and new Chapters 5A–5F.
Updates to Supervisory Statement SS34/15 – Guidelines for completing regulatory...
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal reporting systems, processes, and controls to cease submission of the 37 deleted templates for reference dates from 31 December 2025 onwards
Confirm applicability of consolidated FINREP scoping rules (Chapters 5A–5F) and adjust scoping for remaining templates, incorporating clarified conditions
Assess eligibility for individual FINREP waivers under the updated framework if part of a UK consolidation group; apply to PRA if criteria met (90-95% asset contribution)
Update compliance policies and training to reflect SS34/15 amendments and aligned remittance deadlines
Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations for any ongoing requirements tied to deleted templates and prepare for potential future changes
Key Dates
8 December 2025- Publication of PS27/25, finalizing policy and responses to CP21/25 consultation.
31 December 2025- Effective date for revised rules, amended SS34/15, and deletions; applies to reporting reference dates falling on or after this date (avoids 2025 Q4 submissions where relevant).
11 November 2025- Q3 2025 remittance deadline (precedes PS publication, so no concession for early non-reporting).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Changes are simplificatory (deletions reduce burden), with immediate effect from 31 December 2025, but no new requirements or penalties for non-compliance with deleted items; firms must act promptly to decommission processes and avoid erroneous submissions. This matters as it lowers ongoing costs (especially for larger reporters) and sets precedent for FBD phases targeting further efficiencies, but smaller firms see limited benefit without broader reforms.
In line with the Bank's transition to a repo-led, demand-driven operational framework for providing reserves, the Bank is today announcing a reduction in the spread to Bank Rate of the Operational Standing Facility (OSF). This Market Notice confirms the new, recalibrated spread of the OSF at Bank Rate +15bps for the lending facility and Bank Rate -15bps for the deposit facility. As with all SMF facilities, the OSFs are 'open for business' and should be used by SMF participants for the purpose...
A raft of new measures designed to support the growth of the mutuals sector have been announced today by the financial regulators. They include a review of credit union regulations and the launch of a Mutual Societies Development Unit by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has issued PS26/25, finalizing the withdrawal of Supervisory Statement (SS) 20/15, which previously set prescriptive expectations for building societies' treasury and lending activities, effective immediately upon publication on 5 December 2025. This deregulatory move reduces administrative burdens, enhances proportionality across deposit takers, and promotes competition by aligning building societies more closely with banks, while relying on existing tools like the PRA Rulebook, SMCR, and routine supervision for risk management. It matters for compliance teams as it eliminates specific guidance often misinterpreted as binding requirements, freeing firms to tailor risk frameworks but requiring vigilance on broader prudential expectations.
What Changed
Full deletion of SS20/15: Removes all expectations on treasury and lending activities, including the "Treasury Approaches" framework, without replacement.
Consequential amendments: Updates SS31/15 (Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process and Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process) to excise references to SS20/15.
Alignment with broader policy: Addresses inconsistencies with PRA's approach for banks, improved sector risk management maturity, and proportionality for smaller firms; supports objectives of safety, soundness, competition, and growth.
No new rules imposed: PRA deems existing...
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Assess risk management
Update governance documents
Engage supervisors
Monitor related reforms
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Effective immediately (5 December 2025), but deregulatory nature reduces burdens rather than imposing new obligations; critical for year-end 2025/early 2026 planning to avoid legacy SS20/15 misapplication. Matters as it shifts from prescriptive "hard limits" (often treated as rules) to principles-based supervision, enabling flexibility but heightening reliance on firm-specific risk assessments amid PRA's focus on competition and growth; non-compliance risks arise from over-reliance on withdrawn guidance or inadequate tailoring.
This report has been informed by the PRA and FCA’s ongoing regulation and supervision of mutuals and by direct engagement with mutuals and their trade associations in sessions around the country throughout 2025.
The Bank of England (the Bank) has today launched its second system-wide exploratory scenario (SWES) exercise. This will focus on how the private markets ecosystem operates under stress and the potential implications for UK financial stability and the UK real economy.
CP22/25 is a consultation paper on post-implementation amendments to UK Solvency II reporting and disclosure requirements, published by the PRA on 4 December 2025. The consultation addresses feedback and queries from insurance firms following the substantial reduction in reporting templates implemented at the end of 2024, clarifying expectations for compliance with the revised Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook across multiple technical areas including accident/underwriting year reporting, annuity reporting by currency, and internal model governance disclosures.
What Changed
The consultation introduces clarifications and amendments to Solvency II reporting requirements in several critical areas:
*Reporting Framework Modifications
Accident or underwriting year reporting: The PRA sets expectations for how firms should apply options within the Reporting Part of the PRA Rulebook regarding temporal classification of claims.
Annuity reporting by currency: Specific guidance on reporting annuities stemming from non-life obligations disaggregated by currency.
RBNS claims development**: Clarification on reporting of reported but not settled (RBNS) claims and their...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (January-February 2026)
*Review consultation paper
*Assess applicability
*Identify gaps
*Engage supervisory contacts
Key Dates
4 December 2025- PRA published CP22/25 consultation paper
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of new annual quantitative reporting template requirements (AoC.01) for firms with financial year-end on or after this date
31 December 2025- Baseline date for commencement of quarterly QMC.01 reporting for internal model firms with financial year-end on or after this date
55 business days after quarter-end- Deadline for quarterly QMC.01 submission (internal model firms)DEADLINE
100 business days after financial year-end- Deadline for annual AoC.01 submission (internal model firms and groups)DEADLINE
PS25/25 is the PRA's policy statement providing feedback on CP10/25 and issuing updated Supervisory Statement SS5/25, which replaces SS3/19 to enhance banks' and insurers' management of climate-related financial risks through strengthened governance, risk management, scenario analysis, data quality, and disclosures. It matters because it sets a higher regulatory bar for embedding climate risks proportionately into core processes like ICAAP, ILAAP, ORSA, and financial reporting, promoting resilience and strategic decision-making amid evolving climate threats.
What Changed
The main changes in SS5/25 from SS3/19 and CP10/25 responses include:
Proportionate application clarification: New 'Overarching aims' section in Chapter 3 explains how firms should tailor expectations to their climate risk exposure, business size, and complexity via a two-step process (assess materiality, then respond).
Governance strengthening: Boards and senior management must actively oversee climate risks, embedding them in strategy and ensuring accountability.
Risk management enhancements: Integrate climate risks into existing frameworks/risk registers (supplementary sub-registers...
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis against SS5/25 within 6 months and remediate (e
Integrate climate risks into board oversight, strategy, risk registers, ICAAP/ILAAP (banks), ORSA/stress testing (insurers), and financial reporting
Perform CSA exercises commensurate with exposures, using suitable scenarios to inform decisions; enhance data quality and disclosures
Ensure senior accountability and alignment with standards like SS1/21
Key Dates
3 December 2025- PS25/25 and SS5/25 published; SS5/25 effective immediately, replacing SS3/19.
Within 6 months (by ~June 2026)- Firms assess gaps against new expectations and develop remediation plans (industry guidance).
Ongoing- Forward-looking, strategic implementation proportionate to risks; PRA may request progress evidence.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately (3 Dec 2025), requiring significant uplift to existing approaches; non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny, as PRA expects ambitious, ongoing progress and may request evidence. Matters for capital/liquidity planning, resilience, and strategic viability amid maturing climate risk landscape.
SS5/25 is the PRA's updated supervisory statement, published on 3 December 2025, replacing SS3/19 and setting enhanced expectations for banks and insurers to manage climate-related risks through governance, risk management, scenario analysis, data quality, and disclosures. It matters because it represents a step change from awareness-raising to embedding robust, proportionate practices that integrate climate risks into core prudential processes like ICAAP, ILAAP, ORSA, and capital planning, aligning with the PRA's objectives for firm safety and soundness amid evolving physical and transition risks.
What Changed
Replaces SS3/19 entirely: Introduces a more mature, consolidated framework reflecting international standards (e.g., BCBS), with detailed transmission channels for climate risks across credit, market, liquidity, insurance, and operational categories.
Governance enhancements: Emphasizes board accountability, integration into business strategy, climate risk appetite statements, and linkage to Senior Managers & Certification Regime (SM&CR) without new Senior Management Functions (SMFs); promotes challenge culture and Management Information (MI).
Risk management integration: Requires embedding...
What You Need To Do
Conduct materiality assessment of climate risks to scope proportionality (leverage TCFD/CSRD work)
Embed climate risks in governance
Integrate into risk frameworks
Perform climate scenario analysis
Enhance data
Key Dates
3 December 2025Publication of PS25/25 and SS5/25; replaces SS3/19 effective immediately.
Within 6 months of 3 December 2025 (by ~3 June 2026)Firms assess gaps against new expectations and develop implementation plans.
April 2025Consultation paper CP10/25 issued (feedback incorporated in final policy).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately with a 6-month window (~June 2026) for gap closure, this demands significant operational uplift (e.g., data, scenarios, integration) amid PRA's shift to enforcement; non-compliance risks supervisory action, given climate risks' materiality to prudential stability and alignment with global standards.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
PS23/25 from the PRA and FCA finalizes amendments to Binding Technical Standards (BTS) 2016/2251 under UK EMIR, introducing an indefinite exemption for single-stock equity options and index options from bilateral margin requirements, removing IM obligations on legacy contracts for firms falling below thresholds, and allowing alignment with third-country jurisdictions' timelines for IM assessments. These changes reduce operational burdens and enhance competitiveness for UK firms trading non-centrally cleared derivatives, following feedback from CP5/25, while maintaining prudential standards.
What Changed
Indefinite exemption for equity options: Single-stock equity options and index options are permanently exempted from UK bilateral initial margin (IM) and variation margin (VM) requirements, replacing a temporary exemption ending 4 January 2026. This balances safety with international competitiveness, as capital can substitute for margin.
Legacy contracts relief: Firms falling below the Average Aggregate Notional Amount (AANA) threshold no longer need to exchange IM on outstanding legacy non-centrally cleared derivatives contracts.
Third-country alignment: UK firms can adopt another...
What You Need To Do
Assess cross-border transactions
Conduct gap analysis on margin calculations, collateral management, and reporting; train front-to-back office teams on changes
Retain records of AANA calculations and threshold monitoring to justify exemptions or relief
For firms with collected IM on now-exempt legacy positions, evaluate release options per updated FCA instrument language
Key Dates
11 August 2025PRA submits final technical standards instrument to HM Treasury (HMT).
15 August 2025FCA submits final technical standards instrument to HMT.
11 September 2025HMT deems approval of PRA’s instrument.
24 September 2025HMT deems approval of FCA’s instrument.
27 November 2025Amendments to BTS 2016/2251 effective date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Effective immediately since 27 November 2025 (over a month ago as of current date), firms risk non-compliance if systems still enforce outdated IM/VM for exemptions; operational fixes are needed urgently to avoid breaches, fines, or disputes, especially with phase-out of temporary equity options relief approaching 4 January 2026. Impacts cost savings but requires swift policy recalibration for ongoing UK EMIR adherence.
The Bank of England welcomes the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recognition of the 2024 versions of the FX Global Code and UK Money Markets Code under its code recognition scheme.
The PRA held roundtable meetings on artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI and ML) in the context of Supervisory Statement (SS)1/23 ‘Model risk management principles for banks’
AI Analysis
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) held roundtable sessions on 20 and 22 October 2025 with 21 regulated firms to discuss AI and machine learning (AI/ML) adoption under Supervisory Statement SS1/23 on model risk management (MRM) principles for banks. This matters because it highlights PRA's strategic supervisory focus on AI/ML model risks, urging firms to enhance governance, risk appetite, monitoring, and validation to mitigate opacity, overfitting, and rapid performance degradation in these models. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/pra-holds-model-risk-management-roundtable-on-ai | https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/ai-roundtable-oct-2025.pdf
What Changed
This is not a formal rule change but supervisory guidance via roundtable insights reinforcing SS1/23 principles (effective since 2023). Key emphases include:
Risk appetite: Boards must articulate AI/ML-specific model risk appetite pre-deployment to avoid exceeding tolerances, given higher uncertainty from opacity.
Model inventories and tiering: Address inaccurate/incomplete inventories and aggregate risks from deploying similar AI/ML across portfolios/jurisdictions; challenge tiering for complexity.
Model development: Assess trade-offs in performance vs.
What You Need To Do
Review and strengthen board-level model risk appetite statements to explicitly cover AI/ML opacity and uncertainty; integrate into governance triggers like re-validation
Enhance model inventories for completeness, aggregate risk assessment, and cross-jurisdictional tiering challenges
Update model development policies to evaluate AI/ML trade-offs (e
Revise ongoing monitoring policies for more frequent, quantitative checks on AI/ML (e
Participate in PRA initiatives like MRM roundtables or AI Consortium for dialogue; align first/second-line defenses per SS1/23
Key Dates
20-22 October 2025- PRA held CRO roundtable sessions with 21 firms on AI/ML MRM.
24 November 2025- PRA published roundtable summary and slides. https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2025/november/pra-holds-model-risk-management-roundtable-on-ai
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not critical as no new rules or deadlines, but high relevance for AI/ML users amid PRA's strategic MRM focus; non-compliance risks supervisory actions, given observations of gaps in monitoring and governance. Matters for banks scaling AI (rising adoption per industry views), as unaddressed risks like rapid degradation could amplify losses (e.g., historical model failures cost billions). https://www.articsledge.com/post/model-risk-management | https://www.finextra.com/blogposting/30372/the-pras-latest-view-on-ai-governance-implications-for-uk-banks
From the start of December, UK bank customers will benefit from an increase to the maximum amount they would be reimbursed for if their bank were to fail
The PRA's PS24/25 finalizes rules increasing Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) depositor protection limits from £85,000 to £120,000 and temporary high balances (THB) from £1 million to £1.4 million for firm failures on or after 1 December 2025, responding to consultation feedback in CP4/25. This matters for PRA-authorized deposit-takers as it enhances consumer protection amid inflation but requires urgent system and disclosure updates to avoid FSCS payout delays or regulatory breaches. Firms must prioritize single customer view (SCV) readiness and phased disclosure revisions to comply efficiently.
What Changed
Increased Protection Limits: Standard FSCS deposit limit rises from £85,000 to £120,000; THB limit from £1 million to £1.4 million, applying to failures from 1 December 2025.
SCV System Updates: Firms must update SCV systems (used by FSCS for rapid compensation) to reflect new limits from 1 December 2025, including accurate contact details.
Disclosure Materials:
- Update information sheets on FSCS cover to reflect new limits and improve clarity/accessibility; provide to depositors as soon as practicable post-1 December 2025, by 31 May 2026.
- Revise compensation stickers/posters (for...
What You Need To Do
Immediate (pre-1 Dec 2025)
By 1 Dec 2025
Post-1 Dec 2025 to 31 May 2026
Document changes for audit trails; consider regtech for SCV automation
Key Dates
1 December 2025- New deposit (£120,000) and THB (£1.4 million) limits apply to firm failures on/after this date; SCV systems must be updated; SS18/15 and SoP1/15 effective.DEADLINE
As soon as practicable after 1 December 2025- Provide updated information sheets, stickers/posters, and exclusions lists to depositors (encouraged immediately to avoid confusion).
31 May 2026- Firm deadline for all disclosure material updates and provision to depositors (six-month transition ends).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – SCV updates are mandatory by 1 December 2025 with no transition, risking delayed FSCS payouts and enforcement if unprepared; disclosure changes allow six months but PRA emphasizes early action to prevent depositor confusion. Impacts operational resilience and conduct risk; non-compliance could trigger supervisory action, especially for firms with outdated systems. Cost-benefit analysis shows minimal PRA impact but higher potential FSCS payouts in failures.
This is the first exercise conducted under the new Solvency UK regulatory regime implemented in 2024. The PRA published sector-level results on 17 November 2025 followed by individual firm disclosure for the core scenario on 24 November 2025.
The PRA's Discussion Paper 2/25 (published November 14, 2025) invites UK life insurers to provide feedback on potential regulatory reforms that would enable them to access **alternative forms of capital through risk transfer to capital markets**, outside traditional equity and debt issuance. This initiative aims to address capital constraints in the UK life insurance sector while maintaining policyholder protection and supporting long-term economic growth.
What Changed
The PRA is considering policy reforms centered on six core principles:
*Capital Quality & Quantity**: Alternative life capital structures must not lower the quality or quantity of capital required to support insurance risks.
*Risk Transfer Focus**: Structures should enable patient capital investment aligned with long-term liability profiles, allowing investors to forgo immediate returns for substantial future gains.
*Capital Relief Priority**: Alternative life capital should predominantly deliver capital relief proportionate to actual risk transfer—not balance sheet financing or...
What You Need To Do
*For UK life insurers
*Assess capital needs
*Prepare consultation response
*Engage with policy development
*Assess structural readiness
Key Dates
6 February 2026– Deadline for stakeholder responses to DP2/25DEADLINE
2026– PRA planned policy design and cost-benefit analysis (alongside HM Treasury work)
The Bank of England, the Monetary Authority of Singapore, and the Bank of Thailand announced a collaboration to explore the technical and policy implications of settling foreign exchange (FX) transactions using synchronised settlement mechanisms.
This was the first meeting of the Market Participants Group (MPG), a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
The PRA's PS22/25 finalizes an increase in the retail deposits threshold for the leverage ratio requirement from £50 billion to £75 billion, introducing a three-year averaging mechanism for calculations, effective 1 January 2026. This adjustment reflects nominal UK GDP growth since 2016 to maintain the Financial Policy Committee's original risk appetite while smoothing cliff-edge effects for firms like building societies. It matters for major UK banks and similar firms as it alters capital planning and leverage ratio applicability, potentially reducing immediate compliance burdens for those nearing the old threshold.
What Changed
Retail deposits threshold raised from £50 billion to £75 billion, adjusted upward from the CP2/25 proposal of £70 billion to account for further GDP growth to Q2 2025 (rounded to nearest £5 billion).
Introduction of a three-year moving average for calculating retail deposits metric, replacing point-in-time values to mitigate volatility and aid capital planning, particularly for building societies.
Non-UK assets threshold remains unchanged at £10 billion.
Modifications by consent disapplying leverage ratio rules during review will cease on 30 June 2026.
These changes are implemented via...
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal retail deposits calculations to incorporate three-year moving average methodology starting 1 January 2026
Assess current and projected retail deposits against £75 billion threshold (and £10 billion non-UK assets) to determine leverage ratio applicability and adjust capital planning accordingly
Prepare to meet 3
For firms with modifications by consent
Update governance, risk models, and board reporting to reflect changes; conduct gap analysis against PRA Rulebook appendices in PS22/25
Key Dates
5 March 2025- PRA publishes Consultation Paper CP2/25 proposing £70 billion threshold.
5 June 2025- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
12 November 2025- PRA issues PS22/25 with final policy.
1 January 2026- Final policy takes effect, applying new £75 billion threshold and three-year averaging.
30 June 2026- Cessation of modifications by consent disapplying leverage ratio rules.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With effectiveness just after today (1 January 2026), firms near £50-75 billion in retail deposits face immediate recalibration of leverage exposures and capital buffers to avoid breaches, amplified by the shift to averaging which requires historical data reconstruction. Non-compliance risks PRA enforcement, heightened scrutiny, or capital inadequacy findings, but the higher threshold and averaging provide planning relief versus the status quo.
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
The Bank of England (the Bank) has today published a consultation paper (CP) setting out its proposed regulatory regime for sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins.
AI Analysis
The Bank of England has published a consultation paper (issued November 10, 2025) proposing a comprehensive regulatory regime for **sterling-denominated systemic stablecoins**, establishing requirements for backing assets, capital, redemption procedures, and operational safeguards. This represents a pivotal step toward implementing the UK's stablecoin framework, with the regime designed to maintain financial stability while enabling viable business models for systemic stablecoin issuers.
What Changed
The proposed regulatory regime introduces several material requirements for systemic stablecoin issuers:
*Backing Asset Composition
Systemic stablecoin issuers will be permitted to hold up to 60% of backing assets in short-term sterling-denominated UK government debt, with the remaining 40% held as deposits at the Bank of England.
What You Need To Do
*For Systemic Stablecoin Issuers
*Monitor and respond to consultation - Submit detailed comments on proposals before February 2026 deadline, particularly on:
Alternative tools to achieve regulatory objectives
Backing asset composition and holding limits
Safeguarding regime design
Key Dates
November 10, 2025- Bank of England published consultation paper on proposed regulatory regime
February 2026- Consultation deadline (industry to submit comments)DEADLINE
2026- Expected implementation of UK stablecoin regime (timeline subject to consultation outcomes)
Further consultation expected- On detailed design of safeguarding regime and central bank liquidity arrangements
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bank’s administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
This Market Notice confirms that the previously announced increase to the minimum spread over Bank Rate on bids against Level A collateral in the Indexed Long-Term Repo (ILTR) operation will take effect from 17 November 2025.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes today the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA’s) policy statement 20/25 – The Strong and Simple Framework: The simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) – near-final.
AI Analysis
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes the Prudential Regulation Authority's (PRA) Policy Statement (PS) 20/25, which finalizes the second phase of the "Strong and Simple Framework" by introducing a simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), alongside liquidity simplifications. This matters because it reduces regulatory burdens, enhances competition among smaller UK banks and building societies, and maintains resilience without full Basel 3.1 standards, with implementation on 1 January 2027.
What Changed
Pillar 1 simplifications: Adoption of Basel 3.1 standardised approaches to credit and operational risk; disapplication of due diligence for credit risk, simplifications to market risk, removal of counterparty credit risk and CVA requirements for derivatives (with exceptions), and adjustments to Leverage Ratio and Large Exposures.
Pillar 2A methodologies: Simplifications for credit risk, credit concentration risk (CCoR), and operational risk; amendments to single-name concentration monitoring (cluster limit tightened to 200%, excluding credit institutions); full deduction for certain...
What You Need To Do
Assess SDDT eligibility
Update capital frameworks
ICR transitions
Policy and process revisions
Supervisory engagement
Key Dates
17 January 2025Deadline for comments on related CP14/24.DEADLINE
28 October 2025Publication of near-final PS20/25.
1 January 2026Full Basel 3.1 standards apply to ICR opt-in firms (ICR revoked); some changes to SoP2/23, ICAAP/ILAAP update frequencies effective from PS4/26 publication.
20 January 2026Publication of final PS4/26 confirming PS20/25; effective date for ICAAP/ILAAP updates (including reverse stress-testing).
1 January 2027Simplified capital regime for SDDTs takes full effect.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With full implementation on 1 January 2027 (less than 12 months from today), SDDTs face tight timelines for capital recalibrations, ICR exits, and reporting overhauls; missing deadlines risks supervisory intervention or full Basel 3.1 compliance costs. This significantly eases burdens (e.g., simpler buffers, reduced reporting) but requires proactive gap analysis to leverage simplifications while ensuring resilience.
**PS19/25** is the PRA's near-final policy statement finalizing how remaining Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) provisions will be restated into the PRA Rulebook, effective January 1, 2027. This represents a critical step in the UK's transition away from assimilated EU law, giving the PRA expanded rule-making authority over UK banks, building societies, and investment firms while introducing targeted policy changes to securitisation, credit risk treatment, and ECAI mapping.
What Changed
The near-final policy confirms and finalizes the following substantive amendments:
*Securitisation Requirements**
Largely preserves current requirements and supervisory expectations with targeted policy changes
Introduces a new formulaic p-factor for the standardised approach to securitisation
Establishes new capital rules for certain mortgage exposures
Clarifies supervisory expectations for unfunded credit protection in synthetic Significant Risk Transfer (SRT) securitisations by adding expectations to SS9/13
*Level of Application of CRR Requirements**
Restates rules relating to level of...
What You Need To Do
*Review the final policy statement when published in Q1 2026 to understand specific rule changes applicable to your firm's business model
*Assess securitisation impacts
*Evaluate mortgage capital treatment
*Update ECAI mapping processes
*Establish implementation timeline
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PRA published near-final policy statement PS19/25
Q1 2026- PRA intends to publish final policies and rule instruments alongside or shortly after final Basel 3.1 package publication
1 January 2026- Implementation date for certain proposals finalized in PS12/25 (limited scope)
1 January 2027- Implementation date for policies and requirements in PS19/25 (primary implementation date)
PS18/25, published by the PRA on 28 October 2025, retires the "refined methodology" for Pillar 2A capital calculations, replacing it with reliance on the Basel 3.1 Credit Risk Standardised Approach (CR SA) for greater risk sensitivity, transparency, and proportionality. This near-final policy simplifies the Pillar 2A framework, reduces administrative burdens, and aligns with broader Basel 3.1 implementation and the Strong and Simple regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs), promoting safety, soundness, and competition. It matters because it directly impacts credit risk capital add-ons for affected firms, requiring updates to ICAAP/SREP processes ahead of Basel 3.1 timelines.
What Changed
Retirement of Refined Methodology: Eliminates supervisory adjustments to Pillar 2A credit risk add-ons based on IRB benchmarking, as Basel 3.1 CR SA better captures risks and reduces gaps between standardised and IRB approaches.
Policy Material Updates:
- Near-final amendments to Statement of Policy (SoP) 5/15 – The PRA’s methodologies for setting Pillar 2 capital.
- Final amendments to Supervisory Statement (SS) 31/15 – The Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP).
- Descope of SDDTs from SoP5/15 and SS31/15, with new...
What You Need To Do
Review and update internal Pillar 2A methodologies, ICAAP/SREP documentation to remove refined methodology reliance and align with Basel 3
Model/calculate potential capital impacts from CR SA changes vs
Prepare for IRRBB/pension risk clarifications in SS31/15 submissions from 1 July 2026; monitor CP12/25 review
Engage PRA supervisors on firm-specific transitions; update reporting (e
Firms may apply changes early in ICAAP from relevant dates (e
Key Dates
28 October 2025- PS18/25 publication with near-final policy and PRA feedback to CP9/24/CP7/24 consultations.
1 July 2026- Effective date for pension obligation risk amendments in SoP5/15 and SS31/15 clarifications (IRRBB changes partially deferred).
Q2 2026- Expected finalisation of CP12/25 Phase 1 proposals (Pillar 2A review, including IRB benchmarking removal).
Basel 3.1 Implementation Date (TBD, aligned with CR SA go-live)- Retirement of refined methodology and related credit/operational risk changes.
January 2026- PS2/26 published as final policy, minor adjustment to SS31/15 para 5.12A.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must act now to recalibrate Pillar 2A capital ahead of Basel 3.1 and 1 July 2026 effective dates, as retirement eliminates adjustments that reduced add-ons for low-risk CR SA firms, potentially increasing capital requirements despite Basel 3.1 offsets. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny in SREP/ICAAP, higher Pillar 2A requirements, and misalignment with simplified regimes; benefits include reduced complexity/burden long-term.
SS31/15 is the PRA's foundational supervisory statement establishing expectations for how UK-regulated banks and large investment firms must conduct their Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP) and how the PRA will evaluate these assessments through its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP). This guidance is critical because it directly determines the capital requirements firms must maintain and establishes the supervisory framework through which the PRA assesses whether firms hold sufficient capital to cover material risks.
What Changed
The supervisory statement establishes several core regulatory expectations:
*ICAAP Requirements**
Firms must assess on an ongoing basis whether they hold sufficient capital to cover all material risks, including interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB), market risk, operational risk, concentration risk, group risk, pension obligation risk, and foreign currency lending to unhedged retail and SME borrowers
Firms must implement stress testing and scenario analysis as integral components of capital planning
The management body must be actively involved and engaged in all relevant stages of...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Actions
*Establish ICAAP Framework
*Risk Identification and Assessment
*Stress Testing and Scenario Analysis
Results of stress tests carried out in accordance with CRR requirements for firms using IRB approaches or internal models
Key Dates
29 July 2015- SS31/15 first published, replacing PRA SS5/13 and PRA SS6/13
1 July 2026- Effective date for updates to SS31/15 (as referenced in recent amendments)
Ongoing- Firms must carry out ICAAP on a continuous basis in accordance with PRA ICAA rulesDEADLINE
**PS20/25** represents the second and final phase of the PRA's "Strong and Simple Framework," establishing a significantly simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs) while maintaining their resilience. This near-final policy statement, published on 28 October 2025, fundamentally restructures capital requirements, liquidity rules, and operational frameworks for SDDTs—a critical development for smaller deposit-taking institutions seeking regulatory relief from disproportionate compliance burdens.
What Changed
The simplified capital regime introduces structural changes across all three pillars of capital requirements:
*Pillar 1 (Risk-Weighted Assets)
SDDTs must apply Basel 3.1 standardised approaches for credit risk and operational risk, with specific simplifications.
Due diligence requirements in the standardised approach to credit risk are disapplied for SDDTs.
Counterparty credit risk (CCR) for derivatives and credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk are disapplied (with minor exceptions).
Market risk framework is simplified, with SDDTs applying the credit risk approach to trading book positions...
What You Need To Do
*For SDDTs Currently Operating or Considering Entry:
*Notification Decision – Determine whether to enter the SDDT regime and submit notification to the PRA by 31 March 2026 if seeking to benefit from simplified rules
*Policy Review – Conduct comprehensive review of PS20/25, related policy statements (PS18/25, PS19/25, PS8/25, PS14/25), and supporting methodologies (SoP5/25, SS4/25, amendments to SoP2/23)
*Capital Calculation Transition – Prepare systems and processes to transition from current capital calculation methodologies to Basel 3
Removal of CCR and CVA calculations for derivatives
Key Dates
31 March 2026– Deadline for firms wishing to enter the SDDT regime to notify the PRA and benefit from the simplified framework at implementation.DEADLINE
1 January 2027– Implementation date for the simplified capital regime for SDDTs; the Interim Capital Regime will no longer apply.
2026 (specific date TBD)– PRA to make final rules and policy covering the entire Basel 3.1 package once HM Treasury makes commencement regulations to revoke relevant CRR provisions.
2027 (specific date TBD)– PRA to implement restatement of CRR requirements (PS19/25).
PS17/25 establishes the **Matching Adjustment Investment Accelerator (MAIA) framework**, enabling PRA-regulated insurers to regularize and expand their use of matching adjustment (MA) in calculating capital requirements for certain long-duration insurance liabilities. This framework is significant because it provides a structured pathway for firms to optimize capital efficiency while maintaining prudential safeguards through exposure limits, eligibility assessments, and breach remediation mechanisms.
What Changed
The MAIA framework introduces the following regulatory requirements:
*Permission and Eligibility Framework
Firms must obtain explicit MAIA permission** from the PRA to use the accelerator
Permission grants authority to regularize previously non-compliant MA assets and apply MA to new eligible assets within defined parameters
*Exposure Limits
Firms receive fixed monetary exposure limits** calibrated using the Best Estimate of Liabilities (BEL) of the MA portfolio, net of reinsurance, at the time of permission grant
Limits remain fixed until the next formal variation of MAIA...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Q4 2025 - Q1 2026)
*Assess eligibility for MAIA permission by reviewing current MA portfolio and prospective assets
The PRA has published LIAC02/25, a consultation on proposed low impact amendments to rules and policy.
AI Analysis
The PRA's LIAC02/25 consultation, published on 16 October 2025, proposes low-impact amendments to its Rulebook and policy materials, including technical fixes, conditional disapplications, and miscellaneous corrections to enhance accuracy and align with prior policies. These changes matter for PRA-regulated firms as they ensure regulatory consistency with minimal operational burden, with most taking effect in late 2025 or early 2026 following the consultation period.
What Changed
The main proposals include:
Conditional disapplication of PRA General Provisions to implement deference arrangements under the UK-Swiss Berne Financial Services Agreement.
Amendment to Transitional Measure on Technical Provisions (TMTP) Part, Rule 5.2, introducing a new formula for 'Wr' effective 31 December 2025, using existing 'Wq' values without retrospective recalculation.
Amendment to Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (ISPV) Part, Solvency Requirements Rule 2.2A(3), clarifying the 'no co-mingling' requirement, effective 23 December 2025, alongside updates to SS2/25.
Miscellaneous...
What You Need To Do
Submit consultation responses by 13 November 2025 via the PRA's Low Impact Amendments Process page, focusing on proposed disapplications, TMTP formula, ISPV rules, and miscellaneous changes
Review and update internal policies for TMTP calculations to adopt the new 'Wr' formula from 31 December 2025 year-end, without restating priors
Confirm compliance with ISPV 'no co-mingling' clarifications and SS2/25 updates by 23 December 2025
Verify Rulebook references (e
For friendly societies/credit unions
Key Dates
13 November 2025Consultation closes for LIAC02/25 responses.
21 October 2025Effectiveness of Solvency II restatement amendments (from prior consultations).
23 December 2025Effectiveness of ISPV Rule 2.2A(3), TMTP Rule 5.2A(3), minimum fees reduction, and related SS2/25 updates; also LIAF03/25 amendments per industry reports.
19 January 2026Effectiveness of Securitisation Part Rule 2, Article 7 amendment aligning with FSMA revocations.
24 July 2025Effectiveness of certain non-substantive Solvency II fixes (already passed).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low – These are explicitly "low impact" technical, typographical, and alignment amendments with no material capital, reporting, or operational shifts expected; many stem from prior consultations (e.g., CP8/25, CP12/23, PS10/25) and avoid retrospective changes. Firms should act promptly on response deadlines and upcoming effectives (e.g., December 2025) to prevent minor non-compliance, but resource allocation can be minimal given the non-substantive nature.
The PRA and FCA have today confirmed plans to increase flexibility around senior banker pay, alongside changes to create better links between bonus awards and responsible risk-taking.
PS21/25 implements reforms to PRA remuneration rules for banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms, simplifying Material Risk Taker (MRT) identification, aligning deferral periods with international standards (4 years for non-SMF MRTs and 5 years for SMFs), and enhancing links to individual accountability under the Senior Managers Regime (SMR). These changes matter as they reduce regulatory burden, increase flexibility in bonus structures (e.g., marginal deferral rates and cash payments), and promote competitiveness while maintaining risk alignment, potentially reversing trends toward higher fixed pay.
What Changed
MRT Identification: Simplified quantitative threshold to the top 0.3% of earners (assessed against risk impact); qualitative criteria unchanged; raised proportionality threshold for disapplying rules from £44,000 variable pay to £660,000 total pay (with variable pay ≤33% of total); reintroduced exemption for MRTs serving <3 months.
Deferral Periods: 4-year minimum for non-SMF MRTs (previously varied); reduced to 5 years for SMFs (from 7 years); aligns with FCA and international practice.
Deferral Rates: Marginal system—40% deferral on first £660,000 of variable remuneration, 60% above;...
What You Need To Do
Review and update MRT identification processes, applying simplified top 0
Revise remuneration policies for deferral (4/5 years, marginal rates), upfront cash flexibility, and instrument expectations; update bonus award calculations
Embed SMR-linked adjustments
For dual-regulated firms
Optional early adoption for specified changes on 2025/unvested awards; document governance for RemCo approvals and board policies
Key Dates
15 October 2025Publication date; some changes (e.g., deferral periods, pro-rata vesting) may apply to ongoing 2025 performance year and unvested prior awards at firm discretion.
16 October 2025Final rules and updated SS2/17 take effect; apply to performance years starting after this date (e.g., mandatory from 1 January 2026 for calendar-year firms).
November 2024Preceding joint consultation (CP16/24/PRA, CP24/23/FCA) closed prior to PS.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Mandatory from performance years post-16 October 2025 (e.g., 2026 for most), with immediate opt-in possible; impacts 2026 bonus cycles, requiring swift policy rewrites amid year-end planning. Matters due to simplified but ownership-heavy MRT processes, SMR-pay linkages raising accountability risks, and flexibility needing robust justification to avoid supervisory challenge; non-compliance risks enforcement under PRA accountability regimes.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement.
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
PS15/25 introduces **new liquidity risk reporting requirements for major UK insurance firms**, closing data gaps identified during the March 2020 "dash for cash" and September 2022 LDI crisis. The policy mandates four new reporting templates for firms with significant derivatives or securities lending exposure, with implementation deferred to **30 September 2026** to allow adequate preparation time.
What Changed
The PRA's final policy establishes the following regulatory framework:
*New Reporting Templates**
Four new liquidity reporting templates have been introduced to capture previously unavailable data:
Annual committed facilities template
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template (short form)
Monthly cash-flow mismatch template for ring-fenced funds, matching adjustment portfolios, and remaining parts
Additional supervisory reporting requirements
*Scope and Thresholds
Firms are subject to liquidity reporting if they meet both of the following conditions:
Gross notional value of derivatives contracts...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Actions (by Q2 2026)
*Threshold Assessment
*RFF Mapping
*System Readiness
*Data Governance
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA published PS15/25 (policy statement)
31 December 2025- Original implementation deadline (now superseded)DEADLINE
30 September 2026- **Final implementation date for all liquidity reporting requirements**
First reporting reference date after 30 September 2026- Firms meeting threshold conditions must commence reportingDEADLINE
Three consecutive annual reporting reference dates- Threshold for ceasing reporting once firms fall below thresholds
SS15/16 establishes the PRA's expectations for UK insurance firms using approved internal models to calculate their Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR), requiring them to maintain the ability to calculate SCR using the standard formula and submit standard formula SCR calculations for regulatory monitoring purposes. This guidance is critical because it ensures capital requirements remain reflective of actual firm risks and protects policyholder security by preventing model drift—where internal models diverge from underlying risk realities over time.
What Changed
The supervisory statement introduces several core regulatory expectations:
Internal Model Maintenance Requirement: Firms with approved internal models must maintain the capability to calculate SCR using the standard formula, even if they primarily use internal models for capital calculations.
Standard Formula SCR Reporting: Firms using approved internal models to calculate solo SCR are expected to report standard formula SCR results privately to the PRA on an annual basis.
Model Drift Monitoring Framework: The PRA uses model drift ratios calculated at model approval and re-based following...
What You Need To Do
*Maintain Dual Calculation Capability
*Establish Annual Reporting Process
*Integrate into Risk Management
*Obtain Senior Management Approval
*Maintain Supporting Documentation
Key Dates
25 October 2016- Original SS15/16 publication
31 December 2018- Document updated (referenced in original guidance)
September 2025- Most recent update to SS15/16 published, clarifying expectations for firms with material non-life technical provisions
Four weeks after annual quantitative reporting submission- Deadline for standard formula SCR reportingDEADLINE
30 September 2026- Implementation deadline for liquidity reporting rules (related Solvency II development)DEADLINE
Letter to chief financial officers of selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers which provides thematic feedback from the PRA’s review of written auditor reports received in 2025 covering IFRS 9 expected credit loss accounting (ECL) and accounting for climate risk.
AI Analysis
The PRA's Dear CFO Letter, issued on 30 September 2025 by David Bailey, provides thematic feedback to selected PRA-regulated deposit-takers based on its 2025 review of auditor reports on IFRS 9 expected credit loss (ECL) accounting and climate risk integration. It matters because it highlights persistent supervisory concerns around timely credit risk recognition, model limitations, recovery assumptions, and climate impacts amid economic uncertainty, urging firms to strengthen ECL processes to ensure safety and soundness.
What Changed
This is not a formal rule change or new regulation but thematic feedback building on prior years, with "areas of focus" for improvement:
Model risk: Elevated due to macroeconomic/geopolitical uncertainty; firms must enhance post-model adjustments (PMAs) for completeness (e.g., affordability risks, sector vulnerabilities), granular monitoring of borrower cohorts/ECL components, and model redevelopment governance.
Recovery strategies: Ongoing risk of historical bias in Loss Given Default (LGD) estimates; challenge realism of recovery assumptions for vulnerable sectors/borrowers.
Climate risks:...
What You Need To Do
Conduct self-assessments against annex "areas of focus" (model risk, recovery, climate) and share with auditors ahead of 2026 reporting
Enhance PMAs
Model improvements
Recovery processes
Climate integration
Key Dates
30 September 2025- PRA issues Dear CFO Letter with thematic feedback.
2025- Auditor reports reviewed by PRA (basis for this feedback).
2026- Next round of written auditor reporting on firms' progress against areas of focus, including data aggregation and securitisation impacts; firms encouraged to self-assess now.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Persistent issues from prior years (e.g., 2024 feedback) indicate elevated model risk in uncertain conditions could lead to PRA scrutiny, auditor findings, or enforcement if unaddressed; 2026 auditor reports will benchmark progress, risking heightened supervision. Matters for prudential stability as ECL underpins capital requirements.
The PRA's CP21/25 proposes deletion of 37 banking regulatory reporting templates—primarily 34 FINREP templates representing approximately one-third of all FINREP collections—as the first phase of its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme. This initiative aims to reduce annual reporting burden by approximately £26 million while maintaining supervisory effectiveness by eliminating duplicative, outdated, or low-value data collections.
What Changed
The PRA proposes the following regulatory deletions:
*FINREP Template Deletions:**
Permanent deletion of 34 whole FINREP reporting templates (approximately one-third of all FINREP collections)
Consolidation of remaining FINREP requirements within a single section of the PRA Rulebook
Clarification of scoping conditions where current provisions are unclear, duplicative, or inconsistently applied
Alignment of reporting remittance dates for FINREP reporting
*Other Template Deletions:**
Two COREP templates: C05.01 (Transitional Provisions) and C05.02 (Grandfathered Instruments)
PRA109...
What You Need To Do
*Cease reporting on the 37 deleted templates effective 31 December 2025
*Update internal systems and processes to remove validation rules and submission workflows for deleted templates
*Revise compliance calendars to reflect aligned FINREP reporting remittance dates
*Review Pillar 3 disclosure obligations to identify any continued requirements based on deleted FINREP templates and assess whether disclosure obligations remain despite template deletion
*Implement rulebook changes reflecting consolidation of FINREP scoping provisions into the PRA Rulebook
Key Dates
September 2025- CP21/25 consultation paper published
31 December 2025- Proposed implementation date to avoid firms submitting 2025 Q4 data for deleted templates
8 December 2025- PS27/25 (Policy Statement) published, confirming final policy
CP20/25 is a PRA consultation paper published on 16 September 2025 that proposes targeted updates to the regulatory framework governing third-country insurance branches operating in the UK. The consultation addresses inconsistencies introduced during the Solvency II review, clarifies supervisory expectations, and increases the subsidiarisation threshold—matters that directly affect the operational and compliance costs of non-UK insurers seeking to maintain branch operations rather than establish subsidiaries in the UK market.
What Changed
The consultation proposes four primary regulatory modifications:
*Subsidiarisation Threshold Increase
The PRA proposes raising the FSCS liability threshold above which third-country branches must establish a UK subsidiary from £500 million to £600 million**. The PRA attributes this increase to inflation rather than organic growth, aiming to prevent branches from artificially approaching the current threshold and incurring unnecessary subsidiarisation costs.
*ORSA Reporting Clarification
Current guidance will be updated to clarify that third-country branches must submit an Own Risk and Self...
What You Need To Do
*Threshold Assessment
*Reporting Requirement Review
*Quantitative Metrics Compliance
*Three-Year Notification Obligation
*Asset Holding Verification
Key Dates
16 September 2025- CP20/25 published by the PRA
16 December 2025- Consultation response deadlineDEADLINE
H1 2026- Statement of Policy (SoP) expected to be published; subsidiarisation threshold update anticipated upon SoP publication
31 December 2026- Planned implementation date for rulebook changes