The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Jason Burt, Deputy Director of the Division of Enforcement (Specialized Units), will depart the agency on May 1, 2026, after more than 22 years of public service.โJasonโs exceptional leadershipโฆ
ESMA launches its sixth stress test exercise for Central Counterparties 30 April 2026 CCP Press Releases The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, today launched its sixth stress test exercise for Central Counterparties (CCPs) . The CCP stress test framework drafted by ESMA for the purpose of this exercise is supported by an adverse market scenario provided by the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB). Mandated under the European ...
The FCA has charged Shaun Lawrence for operating as a mortgage broker without authorisation. Mr Lawrence, who also goes by the names Shaun Lawrence-Bright and Shaun Bright, was previously authorised to give mortgage advice.However, in 2008 he had his permissions revoked and was fined. He was also banned from working in financial services.The FCA alleges that Mr Lawrence has breached the Financial Services and Markets Act by continuing to provide mortgage broking services when already banned.M...
From 11 May 2026, cryptoasset firms preparing for the new FSMA regime will be able to request a pre-application meeting with us via our Pre-Application Support Service (PASS). Pre-application meetings are free of charge and give firms the opportunity to discuss their plans with us and ask questions before submitting an application for authorisation or variation of existing permissions.This comes ahead of the new regime for cryptoasset regulation, where firms wanting to undertake the new regul...
Speech by Nikhil Rathi, FCA chief executive, at the Association of Foreign Banks (AFB) luncheon. When I saw that a boxing ring had been temporarily installed in this room last autumn, I wasnโt quite sure whether it was a warning to us regulatorsโฆOr some kind of art installation commenting on the past few years in financial markets.At some points it has felt bruising, to say the least.Some pressures have been sharp and immediate โ geopolitical shocks, sudden market events.Others slower but no ...
Asset managers will find it easier to unlock the benefits of fund tokenisation, following the publication of new guidance by the FCA. The guidance sets out how firms can use distributed ledger technology (DLT) within the regulatorโs existing rules.New rules will also make fund dealing more efficient, including an optional Direct to Fund (D2F) model. This enables investors to deal directly with the fund, whether traditional or tokenised.Tokenisation is a way of representing an asset, or owners...
We have written to people who complained about how we handled Wellesley & Co Ltd (WCL). Complainants raised concerns about our actions in relation to the wider Wellesley Group. WCL was the only FCA-regulated company in the Group and was responsible for approving financial promotions marketed to investors.We carefully reviewed all the complaints that were made and upheld one about how part of WCL's authorisation process was handled at the time. However, we found this did not cause investors' l...
ESMA launches a call for evidence on the structure of European equity markets 30 April 2026 Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has published a call for evidence (CfE) presenting a data driven analysis of the evolution of trading in European equity markets between 2022 and 2025, based on MiFIR transaction reporting data. The CfE invites stakeholder feedback on observed trends and their potential regulatory implications. The analysis shows that European equity markets ...
Singapore, 30 April 2026โฆ The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) today issued its response to the public consultation on proposed amendments to the Securities and Futures Act 2001 (SFA) to facilitate dual listing arrangements on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). The proposed regulatory framework supports the implementation of the Global Listing Board (GLB), a partnership by the SGX and Nasdaq, and facilitates future similar collaborations.
ESMA consults on guidelines on endorsement under the ESG Ratings Regulation 29 April 2026 Credit Rating Agencies The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has launched a public consultation on draft guidelines on endorsement under the ESG Ratings Regulation 1 . The consultation paper sets out ESMAโs proposed approach to the endorsement of non-EU ESG ratings under the regulatory framework and seeks feedback from ESG rating providers and other stakeholders on the draft guidelines. Th...
The FCA is reviewing whether Annual Percentage Rates (APRs) help consumers understand borrowing costs andis seeking views on whetherit should changehow these are communicated in credit advertising. APRsindicatethe yearly cost of borrowing, including interest and fees. A representative APR means at least half of consumers receive that rate or better. Current rules require representative APRs in most credit advertising.Research, published today, shows APRs are useful for comparing products, but...
On 28 April 2026, LCM Family Limited (LCM) went into administration. Louise Longley and Gary Shankland of BTG Begbies Traynor (Central) LLP were appointed as joint administrators of the firm. The joint administrators are responsible for managing the affairs of the firm during the administration process.LCM (previously known as LCM Wealth Management Limited) is authorised by the FCA and provided financial advice and related investment services. LCM is also regulated by the Solicitors Regulatio...
Safeguarding Financial Integrity โ Central Bank of Irelandโs Approach to Financial Crime Prevention Thank you for the invitation to speak at todayโs event. This is an important opportunity for us to engage and share our experiences and approaches to deal with the global challenges and issues we are facing in financial crime. Change, instability, flux, unpredictability - all words that I guarantee you will hear on multiple occasions throughout the dayโs events. I will not be any different. We ...
Funded reinsurance transactions involving UK life insurers will face enhanced regulatory requirements under new proposals unveiled today by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA).
Speech by Sarah Pritchard, FCA deputy chief executive, at the BSA Annual Conference, Edinburgh. As a history lover, itโs thrilling to be in a city like Edinburgh โ called a โhot-bed of geniusโ during the Scottish Enlightenment.What defined the Enlightenment spirit was the refusal to settle, and a determination to make things better for the future.Itโs the kind of approach Iโm taking to this moment of regulatory reform.Working with others to solve difficult problems, protecting trust and good ...
Help us develop a proportionate reporting regime for ESG ratings. Register your interest by 13 May 2026. We're inviting ESG rating providers to join a pilot to inform future regulatory reporting once the regime is live.Our aim is to avoid unnecessary reporting burden for firms over time.The pilot aims to help us assess whether the proposed metrics for ESG ratings reporting are:clearfeasibleproportionate across different business modelsuseful for supervisory purposesParticipants will have a di...
Good morning. Brendan, thank you for the warm introduction. It is a pleasure to join you at the ILCU Internal Audit Services Conference. I also want to thank Barry Harrington for the invitation to address you here today. 1 When I addressed the ILCU Annual Conference last April, I spoke about a time of transformative change for credit unions, a period that would bring both significant opportunities and important challenges. 2 One year on, we can see that transformation taking shape. A revised ...
Open finance has vast potential. It promises to transform financial services for millions of people through firms using customersโ data in bigger and better ways. But to make that promise a reality, we need to look at how it works in practice. How does sharing data solve real problems for people and businesses?Thatโs the question we want to answer with our Smart Data Accelerator, which enables firms to showcase open finance solutions in a digital testing environment to help shape policy makin...
More than one in three Irish adults (35%) have experienced fraud or scams. 38% of fraud victims never reported their experience to their financial service provider or any authority. Research identified risky online behaviours as the single strongest predictor of fraud experienceโmore influential than age, income, or education level. Fraud victims are far more likely to recover monies when the fraud is reported. Fraud literacy reduces predicted fraud exposure Central Bank of Ireland of Ireland...
Our scheme is the quickest, fairest and most efficient way to compensate consumers. It is disappointing that some have decided to challenge it and delay consumers getting their money back, when for many the payouts would be very welcome this year as they face rising household bills. This also prolongs the uncertainty for all involved, which is not good for investment or a healthy motor finance market.We are considering our approach and will set out more later this week.
The FCA is seeking views on proposals to change rules that govern the publication of research during the initial public offering (IPO) process. The FCA is consulting on removing the requirement for a 7-day delay before connected research on an IPO can be published. It also consults on removing rules that require firms to provide independent analysts with the same information as their own research analysts.These rules were introduced in 2018 to encourage the production of unconnected research,...
The FCA Board appoints new members to decision-making committee. The Board of the FCA has appointed Jonathan Peddie and Raymond Cox KC as new members of the FCAโs Regulatory Decisions Committee (RDC).The RDC is responsible for taking certain regulatory decisions on behalf of the FCA relating to contested enforcement action. Committee members bring a broad range of professional experience to support fair, independent and evidence-based decision-making.Alison Potter, the chair of the RDC, said:...
Joint Committee annual report highlights digitalisation, cyber resilience and sustainable finance as key priorities of 2025 24 April 2026 Joint Committee The Joint Committee of the European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA โ the ESAs) today published its Annual Report for 2025 , setting out the main priorities and achievements of its cross-sectoral work over the past year. In 2025, the Joint Committee focused on protecting consumers in increasingly digital financial markets, stren...
amending Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine
implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus and the involvement of Belarus in the Russian aggression against Ukraine
amending Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine
The FCA has led international action to stop illegal finfluencers putting consumers' money at risk. Seventeen regulators worldwide took part in the 'week of action' which included enforcement activity, consumer awareness campaigns, and educational programmes for finfluencers who want to act responsibly. Activity started on 20 April 2026.In the UK, the FCA:Secured a guilty plea from Geordie Shoreโs Aaron Chalmers for illegal promotions on social media. Criminal proceedings have been commenced ...
Supervision Marketing Financial products Investment services Savings protection Journalists Investment services providers In an increasingly digital investment landscape, the AMF stresses the importance of the quality of the information...
Sapia has agreed to make a voluntary payment of ยฃ19,637,950 to WealthTek clients and the FCA has censured the firm. Sapia began working with WealthTek in 2013 and later appointed it as one of its appointed representatives. This resulted in Sapia holding and being responsible for protecting client money resulting from WealthTekโs activities.The FCA found Sapia did not put enough safeguards in place to protect this money.Sapia has admitted that it failed to properly separate key roles within it...
Weโve no vested interest in setting up a motor finance redress scheme. What matters to us is getting fair compensation for consumers as quickly as possible and supporting a healthy motor finance market for the future.That's what our scheme will do, and it's free for consumers to use.Learn more about our motor finance redress scheme.Any law firm or claims management company (CMC) involved in a potential challenge against the scheme that also has clients making motor finance claims should consi...
We have published findings from our Financial Adviser Survey. The findings provide an updated picture of how the UK financial advice market is evolving and what this means for firms, consumers and future growth. The survey brings together responses from more than 4,100 financial advice firms; alongside analysis of data we already hold on around 31,000 advisers.Overall, it shows a market that remains broadly stable and continues to support millions of clients, even as firms adapt to consolidat...
The FCA is looking for expressions of interest from market participants to join our advisory committee. The committee was established in 2022, and we are renewing the membership in line with our terms of reference.The purpose of the committee is to support our work in wholesale secondary markets for equities, derivatives, fixed income and commodity derivatives.The committeeโs task is to:help develop reforms that improve market competition, increase consumer protection and enhance the integrit...
This March 2026 report contains an update of the latest consumer price developments in Singapore, prepared by MAS and the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
Speech by Sheree Howard at the APCC Spring Conference 2026. This weekend, tens of thousands of runners will line up in Greenwich Park for the start of the London Marathon.Well done to them โ a Netflix marathon is much more my speed.Unlike whatโs needed to prepare for a Netflix marathon โ opening a bag of sweet and salty popcorn โ Sundayโs runners will have been training for months. Many even years.And nearly all will have had support along the way, whether from a coach, physio or friend at a ...
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) welcomes the dispatch on the revision of the Banking Act, which the Federal Council adopted today. The bill is one of several key measures aimed at strengthening banking stability. In order to achieve the best possible results, FINMA recommends that the measures proposed in the Federal Councilโs parameters for amendments to the Banking Act be implemented in their entirety. In particular, it advocates for the strengthening of statutory i...
Firms willbenefitfromreduced costs andgreater flexibility, andfind it easier tocomply with the Senior Managers and Certification Regime (SM&CR),following reformsset outon 22 April by theFCA and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA). The changes, which come as the first phase of a multi-stage package of reform from the Government and regulators, will maintain the core principle of senior leader accountability, and will benefit firms by:Giving more time to submit senior manager applications whe...
The FCA has carried out its first operation with partners to disrupt illegal peer-to-peer crypto trading across multiple London locations. Working with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and the South West Regional Organised Crime Unit (SWROCU), the FCA targeted 8 premises suspected of illegal peer-to-peer crypto trading. The FCA issued cease and desist letters at each site, notifying traders to stop illegal activity immediately. Evidence obtained during the on-site inspections is supporting a numbe...
Warning Savings protection Warning Crypto-assets Crypto-assets: the Autoritรฉ des Marchรฉs Financiers warns the public about the activities of several unauthorized entities
ESMA support ESEF implementation with updated taxonomy 21 April 2026 Electronic reporting The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published the 2025 European Single Electronic Format (ESEF) XBRL taxonomy files , together with an updated ESEF Conformance Suite . These materials support issuers and software vendors in preparing 2026 IFRS consolidated financial statements using the most upโtoโdate ESEF format. The 2025 taxono...
Speaking at UK FinTech Week, Jessica Rusu, chief data, information and intelligence officer at the FCA, has confirmed the second group of firms selected to join AI Live Testing. Eight new firms, including Barclays, Experian, Lloyds Banking Group (Scottish Widows), and UBS, have been chosen by the FCA to live test AI applications to support safe and responsible deployment.The FCA is working with its technical partner Advai, a London-based specialist in automated AI assurance, to provide AI Liv...
Warning Warning Savings protection Forex and binary options The AMF and the ACPR warn the public against several entities offering in France investments in the unregulated foreign exchange market (Forex) and in crypto-assets derivatives without being authorized to do so
Speech by Jessica Rusu, FCA chief data, information and intelligence officer at IFGS. Key pointsAgentic commerce will change how financial decisions and transactions are made, demanding a fundamentally new approach.We are expanding practical support for firms through the next phase of our AI Lab.Open Finance will provide the foundations of a more intelligent financial system.We are supporting solo-regulated firms scale, with our Scale-Up unit open for expressions of interest.
At its annual media conference today, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA outlined the key areas of its supervision in 2025. It consistently implemented its proportional and risk-based supervisory approach, strengthened the resilience of the institutions under its supervision, and focused on the early detection of emerging risks among those institutions. In its review, it outlined how it protected Swiss financial market clients during the year.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) jointly proposed amendments to reduce private fund reporting burdens while enabling the continued collection of necessary and appropriate information. Theโฆ
AI Analysis
The SEC and CFTC have jointly proposed amendments to Form PF to reduce reporting burdens for private fund advisers by streamlining data requirements, simplifying calculations, and adjusting filing thresholds, while preserving essential information for systemic risk monitoring and investor protection. This matters for compliance professionals as it offers relief from prior expansions to Form PF (adopted in 2024), potentially lowering operational costs amid ongoing regulatory scrutiny, but requires monitoring during the comment period to influence final rules. https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-40-sec-cftc-jointly-propose-amendments-reduce-private-fund-reporting-burdens
What Changed
- Streamlined Reporting Items: Amendments propose removing or simplifying certain Form PF fields, such as reducing detailed breakdowns of investment exposures, counterparty data, and performance...
Adjusted Filing Thresholds: Raise thresholds for "large hedge fund advisers" and "large private equity advisers" (e.g., from $1.5B to potentially higher AUM levels for certain funds), limiting who...
Simplified Calculations: Eliminate complex aggregation rules for master-feeder/parallel structures, revert to prior methods for inflows/outflows and AUM (e.g., no double-counting exclusions for...
Event Reporting Relief: Propose delaying or narrowing 72-hour current event reporting (e.g., for large hedge funds under new Section 6), responding to burden complaints from 2024 amendments.
These...
Suggested Considerations
Review Proposal: Download full proposing release post-Federal Register publication; assess current Form PF processes against proposed simplifications (e.g., audit AUM calculations, exposure schedules).
Submit Comments: File detailed feedback by comment deadline, focusing on burden estimates, implementation feasibility, and alternatives (e.g., via SEC's online portal); prioritize if your firm files quarterly/detailed sections.
Update Systems: Map current reporting workflows to proposed changes; pilot simplified data pulls for inflows, performance, and structures; prepare for potential transition rules if adopted.
Monitor Extensions: Track related no-action relief (e.g., CFTC Letter 25-50 for interim burden reduction) and Form N-PORT extensions.
Internal Training: Educate compliance teams on threshold changes and event reporting tweaks to avoid over-reporting during transition.
Key Dates
Nov. 17, 2027DEADLINE
Extended compliance date for Names Rule-related Form N-PORT reporting (fund groups โฅ$10B AUM); ; related relief via separate SEC action
May 18, 2028DEADLINE
Extended compliance date for Names Rule-related Form N-PORT reporting (fund groups <$10B AUM)
60 days after Federal Register publication (est. mid
2026) - End of public comment period; ; proposing release to be published soon after April 2026 announcement
TBD (post
comment, est. late 2026/early 2027) - Adoption of final amendments; , subject to notice-and-comment revisions
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Proposals signal imminent relief from 2024 Form PF expansions (effective 2025+), which added significant burdens like 72-hour events and granular exposures, but firms must act on comments now (within ~60 days) to shape outcomes and avoid sunk costs in current systems. Matters because it reverses prior increases (e.g., separate master-feeder reporting, detailed strategies), potentially saving millions in annual external costs, but non-response risks locking in suboptimal rules amid FSOC scrutiny.
Cooperation Europe & international Equity Journalists Listed companies and issuers AMF Quรฉbec, OSC and AMF France enter into an agreement to support cross-listing of securities in Canada and France
Help shape financial regulation from the perspective of consumers. We are recruiting 2 new members to the Financial Services Consumer Panel, an independent statutory panel that represents the interests of consumers of financial services to the FCA.Panel members provide constructive challenge and expert advice to help ensure the consumer perspective is fully embedded in the FCAโs policy development and implementation. Members engage regularly with senior FCA colleagues, including the chair, ch...
On 20 March 2026, the Bank of England hosted an event to gather evidence from a broad range of stakeholders as part of the Financial Policy Committeeโs (FPCโs) assessment of bank capital requirements in the UK.
The SONIA Stakeholder Advisory Group supports the Bankโs administration of SONIA by providing advice and technical input to the Bank and the SONIA Oversight Committee
The CSSF publication highlights AMLA's public consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under Articles 16(4) and 17(3) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624, specifying minimum group-wide AML/CFT requirements and additional measures for subsidiaries and branches in third countries. This matters because it aims to harmonize cross-border AML frameworks, ensuring groups maintain consolidated ML/TF risk views and robust controls, particularly in high-risk third-country operations, impacting EU financial groups' compliance structures. Private sector input is encouraged to align standards with practical operations.[https://www.cssf.lu/en/Document/public-consultation-by-amla-on-the-draft-rts-on-group-wide-minimum-requirements-and-additional-measures-for-subsidiaries-and-branches-in-third-countries/][https://www.amla.europa.eu/amla-consults-group-wide-requirements-and-business-wide-risk-assessment_en]
What Changed
- Group-wide AML/CFT frameworks: Establishes minimum standards for design and implementation across groups, including cross-border structures and third-country operations, to enable consolidated...
Third-country subsidiaries and branches: Introduces additional measures for entities in non-EU countries, extending requirements beyond traditional groups to other...
Information sharing and parent identification: Defines provisions for intra-group data sharing and criteria to identify the EU parent undertaking when multiple entities report to a third-country head...
Interlinked mandates: Cross-references obligations between Articles 16(4) and 17(3) for complementary requirements on organizational...
Suggested Considerations
Register for 20 May 2026 public hearing to engage directly on practical application across group structures.[https://www.amla.europa.eu/events/public-hearing-draft-rts-group-wide-minimum-requirements-and-additional-measures-subsidiaries-and-2026-05-20_en]
Assess current group-wide AML/CFT frameworks against proposed minimums, identifying gaps in third-country controls, risk consolidation, and data sharing protocols.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Firms with third-country exposure must act now on consultation (closes 15 July 2026) to influence final RTS, as these will mandate binding minimums for group-wide AML/CFT, potentially requiring significant framework overhauls for risk consolidation and controls. Non-engagement risks misaligned systems post-adoption, increasing supervisory scrutiny under harmonized EU standards; early assessment prevents rushed...
AMLA has launched a public consultation on draft Guidelines for business-wide risk assessments (BWRA) under the new Anti-Money Laundering Regulation (EU 2024/1624), with submissions open until 15 July 2026. These guidelines establish minimum requirements for all obliged entities across financial and non-financial sectors to systematically identify and manage money laundering and terrorist financing risks inherent to their operations.
What Changed
The draft Guidelines introduce four minimum requirements for conducting adequate business-wide risk assessments applicable to all obliged entities. The framework mandates that entities:
Identify risk exposure across their business model, customers, products, services, transactions, delivery channels, and geographical exposure
Maintain consolidated risk views across group structures, eliminating silos between branches and subsidiaries
Utilize internal and external data sources to build comprehensive risk landscapes, including monitoring customer behavior changes and tracking international typologies
Apply proportionality based on entity size, business model, and risk profile, while ensuring consistent application of policies across the organization
The guidelines specifically address evaluation...
Suggested Considerations
*Immediate (by 15 July 2026):
Review draft Guidelines and assess alignment with current BWRA practices
Identify gaps between existing risk assessment frameworks and proposed minimum requirements
Prepare formal consultation responses, particularly if your organization operates in non-financial sectors
Register for relevant public hearings (28 May for BWRA Guidelines; 20 May for group-wide RTS) to engage directly with AMLA
Key Dates
Later in 2026
- Final adoption of guidelines and technical standards
16 April 2026
- Consultation launched
20 May 2026, 10:00โ12:00 CET
- Public hearing on draft RTS on group-wide requirements
28 May 2026, 10:00โ12:00 CET
- Public hearing on draft Guidelines on business-wide risk assessment
MAR Offence of obstructing an AMF investigation sentenced by the Paris Tribunal Correctionnel
AI Analysis
The Paris Tribunal Correctionnel on 9 April 2026 sentenced an individual to a six-month suspended prison term and โฌ20,000 fine for obstructing an AMF house search during a market abuse investigation, plus โฌ5,000 in AMF procedural costs and โฌ1 in damages. This enforcement action underscores the criminal liability for impeding AMF investigations, reinforcing the regulator's authority and serving as a deterrent against non-cooperation. Compliance teams must prioritize training on full cooperation to avoid similar penalties, as maximum sanctions include up to two years' imprisonment and โฌ300,000 fines under the Monetary and Financial Code.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement precedent affirming existing rules under the Monetary and Financial Code (CMF), specifically Article L.642-2, which criminalizes obstruction of AMF inspections or investigations, including refusing access during authorized house searches. The ruling reiterates that even initial refusal of access constitutes obstruction, with courts upholding AMF operations via prior judicial authorization from the *Juge des Libertรฉs et de la Dรฉtention*. It highlights dual administrative and criminal tracks, though a 2022 Constitutional Court decision (QPC no.
Suggested Considerations
Immediate training: Conduct firm-wide sessions on AMF inspection protocols, emphasizing mandatory cooperation, document access, and avoiding any delay or refusal (e.g., scripted responses for employee interactions).
Policy updates: Revise compliance manuals to explicitly prohibit obstruction, including scenarios like home searches for remote workers; designate 24/7 points of contact for AMF visits.
Mock drills: Simulate AMF searches at offices and residences to test response times and access protocols.
Legal readiness: Retain counsel experienced in CMF Article L.642-2 matters; pre-approve cooperation clauses in employee contracts.
- AMF investigators, with judicial police, conducted authorized house search; individual initially refused access
May 2024
- AMF filed report with Paris Public Prosecutor's Office
July 2024
- Paris *Cour dโAppel* upheld search authorization, finding sufficient presumption of market abuse; ordered โฌ5,000 costs to AMF
September 2024
- AMF lodged formal complaint
May 2025
- Paris *Cour dโAppel* validated search and seizure operations; ordered additional โฌ5,000 costs to AMF
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ This recent (April 2026) criminal conviction demonstrates swift judicial support for AMF actions, with appeals consistently rejected, signaling zero tolerance for even minor obstructions. It elevates risks for individuals and firms in *MAR* probes, potentially leading to personal liability, reputational damage, and cascading sanctions; firms must act preemptively as investigations can stem from routine surveillance.
On 16 April 2026, HDH Investment Services Limited (HDH), which advised on and arranged deals in investments, entered Creditorsโ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL). Dina Devalia and Tom Parish of Quantuma Advisory Limited (Quantuma) have been appointed as joint liquidators.On 20 January 2026, HDH agreed to stop carrying out any regulated activity. This was because we were concerned that HDH may have given unsuitable financial advice to some of its customers, potentially leading to financial loss.HDH ...
Today, the High Court published its written judgment in the matter of the Central Bankโs application under the Fitness & Probity Regime to confirm the one-year prohibition issued to a senior executive on 02 February 2022 concerning his role in a regulated firm in the investment fund and asset management sector. The decision of the High Court was to refuse the application. The Central Bank acknowledges the importance of the Courtโs findings and the clarity that the judgment provides in this ca...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) issued a statement on 17 April 2026 acknowledging a High Court judgment refusing to confirm a one-year prohibition on a senior executive in the investment fund and asset management sector due to inadequate fair procedures during the CBI's Fitness & Probity (F&P) investigation. This matters for compliance professionals as it underscores the critical need for robust fair procedures in F&P processes and highlights recent legislative and guidance enhancements under the Individual Accountability Framework (IAF) Act 2023 to address such shortcomings. Firms must prioritize these updates to mitigate enforcement risks.
What Changed
- Legislative enhancements via IAF Act 2023: Introduced changes to strengthen CBI's investigation and prohibition powers under the F&P Regime, including additional safeguards for fair procedures in...
Updated Regulations and Guidance (April 2023): CBI published revisions reflecting IAF Act changes, focusing on improved investigation and decision-making processes...
CP-150 Consultation (2025): Led to updated Guidance on consolidated Fitness and Probity Standards, separate from F&P investigations...
CP-166 Consultation on Supplemental Guidance: Public consultation on prohibitions closed 25 March 2026; final guidance expected summer 2026...
Suggested Considerations
Review and implement April 2023 updated F&P Regulations and Guidance to ensure investigations and prohibitions incorporate IAF Act fair procedure safeguards (https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/press-release-central-bank-statement-on-high-court-judgment-17-april-2026).
Conduct internal audits of F&P processes, focusing on fair procedures (e.g., notice, representation rights) for senior executives in CF/PCF roles.
Monitor and prepare for summer 2026 final guidance from CP-166 on prohibitions; submit any late feedback if applicable.
Train compliance and HR teams on heightened procedural standards, referencing High Court emphasis on fair procedures.
For firms in investment funds/asset management: Assess PCF suitability assessments against consolidated F&P Standards from CP-150.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ The High Court ruling directly critiques CBI's past F&P procedures, signaling elevated scrutiny on fair process compliance; failure risks court refusals of prohibitions, reputational damage, and escalated enforcement. With final CP-166 guidance imminent (summer 2026), firms face immediate pressure to align processes, especially post-IAF Act, to avoid similar outcomes in ongoing or future investigations.
Warning: Unauthorised Investment Firm / Unauthorised Investment Business Firm / Unauthorised Irish Collective Asset-Management Vehicle (ICAV) Unauthorised Firm Name Clarus IV ICAV (CLONE) Website https://www.clarusiv.com/ Email addresses used enquiries@clarusiv.com accounts@clarusiv.com michael.granger@clarusiv.com Phone number used +353 1525 9660 Authorisation in Ireland Clarus IV ICAV (Clone) is not authorised to provide investment services in Ireland. Additional Information This firm clone...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has issued a warning notice under section 53 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 regarding **Clarus IV ICAV (CLONE)**, an unauthorised entity cloning a legitimate authorised ICAV to perpetrate investment scams. This matters for compliance professionals as it underscores rising clone firm risks in Ireland's investment sector, requiring vigilance to protect clients and avoid facilitation of scams.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but a specific enforcement action publishing details of an unauthorised clone firm. It highlights no new requirements but reinforces existing obligations under Irish law to verify firm authorisation before engaging in investment services, with the CBI actively using public warnings to combat scams.
Suggested Considerations
Client communications: Issue alerts on clone risks and direct to CBI scam protection resources (www.centralbank.ie/financialscams).
Internal screening: Update compliance systems to flag clone indicators (e.g., similar names, cloned authorisation details); report suspicions to CBI at (01) 224 5800.
Legitimate firms: Publicly disavow any connection if cloned, as emphasised by CBI.
Key Dates
17 April 2026
- CBI publishes warning notice on Clarus IV ICAV (CLONE)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Immediate for client-facing activities due to active scam using Irish phone numbers and domains, but not a new rule change; matters to prevent regulatory scrutiny for inadequate due diligence or client harm under conduct and authorisation rules. Recent pattern of ICAV clones (e.g., Parus ICAV on 08 April 2026, Red Arc on 10 April 2026) signals heightened scam activity, elevating ongoing monitoring needs.
Warning: Unauthorised Investment Firm / Investment Business Firm Unauthorised Firm Name Pimco Global Wealth / Pimco (Ireland) (Clone) Websites www.pimcoglobalwealth.com www.pimcoprivatewealth.com www.pimcoprivateclients.com www.pimcoglobaladvisors.com Email address used admin@pimcoglobalwealth.com Phone numbers used +353 1 912 8604 +353 1 531 4593 Authorisation in Ireland This firm is not authorised to provide investment services in Ireland. Additional information Pimco Global Wealth / Pimco ...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) issued a warning notice on 17 April 2026 under section 53 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013, identifying "Pimco Global Wealth / Pimco (Ireland) (Clone)" as an unauthorised investment firm impersonating the legitimate authorised entity Pimco Global Advisors (Ireland) Limited by cloning its name, CRO number, and address. This matters for compliance professionals as it underscores rising cloning scams targeting Irish consumers, requiring firms to enhance client vigilance, scam monitoring, and public communications to mitigate reputational and conduct risks.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but a specific enforcement warning publicising an unauthorised clone firm operating via listed websites (www.pimcoglobalwealth.com, www.pimcoprivatewealth.com, www.pimcoprivateclients.com, www.pimcoglobaladvisors.com), email (admin@pimcoglobalwealth.com), and Irish phone numbers (+353 1 912 8604, +353 1 531 4593). It reinforces CBI's ongoing use of section 53 powers to name and shame unauthorised entities engaged in deceptive practices, with no new rules but heightened emphasis on consumer deception via firm cloning.
Suggested Considerations
Verify authorisation: Firms and clients must check CBI's register (www.centralbank.ie) before engaging with any entity claiming to offer investment services.
Issue internal alerts: Authorised firms should disseminate this warning to staff, clients, and intermediaries via emails, client portals, and websites, emphasising no connection to clones.
Monitor and report: Screen for the listed websites, emails, and phone numbers in client communications; report suspicious activity to CBI at (01) 224 5800 or via unauthorised firm reporting portal.
Enhance controls: Implement or update scam detection protocols, including client onboarding checks for impersonation red flags and training on cloning tactics.
Public disclaimers: Legitimate firms like PIMCO should post fraud warnings, as seen on their site, advising against sharing personal/bank details with unknowns.
Key Dates
17 April 2026
- CBI publishes warning notice on Pimco Global Wealth (Clone)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Immediate for Pimco-impacted firms due to active deception using Irish contact details, but medium overall as CBI warnings are routine (e.g., multiple Pimco clones in 2024-2026). Matters for conduct risk, client protection, and reputation; failure to act could breach CBI fitness & probity or consumer duty expectations, especially amid rising scams (e.g., Clarus IV ICAV clone on same date).
The PRA's CP7/26 consultation proposes fee rates and amendments to the Fees Part of the PRA Rulebook for 2026/27 to meet a Total Funding Requirement (TFR) of ยฃ346.6 million, down 1% from 2025/26, primarily funding Ongoing Regulatory Activities (ORA) at ยฃ329.3 million. This matters for PRA-authorised firms as it involves adjusted periodic fees across blocks, increased allocations for initiatives like Future Banking Data, and other targeted fees, requiring budget planning and potential consultation responses.
What Changed
- Proposed fee rates to cover the 2026/27 Annual Funding Requirement (AFR) of ยฃ329.3 million (ORA only, down 2% from 2025/26).
Increased cost allocation for the Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, from ยฃ3.2 million to ยฃ6.8 million (111% rise), contributing to 'other fees to industry' rising 26% to ยฃ17.4 million.
Adjustments to specific fees: internal model application fees, model maintenance fee (ยฃ9.6 million, unchanged), Special Project Fee for restructuring, and new firm authorisation fees for Type 1...
Fee block variations, e.g., A1 (Modified Eligible Liabilities) fee rates down 7% despite 6% tariff data growth; A3 (Gross Written Premiums) down 4%, Best Estimate Liabilities down 2%; minimum fees...
Overall TFR down 1% to ยฃ346.6 million, with provisional figures subject to revision based on final costs.
Suggested Considerations
Review proposed fee impacts using tariff data (e.g., via PRA-provided tables) and budget for 2026/27 TFR, including potential increases in FBD/other fees.
Submit responses by 15 May 2026, indicating confidentiality preferences, consent to name publication, and whether responding individually or for an organisation; personal data will be handled per Bank privacy notice.
For new applicants or restructuring firms: Factor in updated authorisation and Special Project Fees during planning.
Monitor PRA Business Plan 2026/27 for funded activities context.
Key Dates
15 May 2026DEADLINE
Consultation response deadline; (responses via email to CP7_26@bankofengland.co.uk or post to PRA Fees Policy Team)
2026/27
Proposed effective period for new fee rates; (following policy statement; exact implementation tied to PRA Rulebook amendments, typically post-consultation)
June/July 2026 (expected)
Policy statement with final rules; (analogous to FCA timeline in CP26/11)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ Firms must incorporate provisional fee changes into 2026/27 financial planning, but overall TFR/ORA reductions mitigate immediate pressure; however, block-specific adjustments (e.g., FBD uplift) and consultation response could affect budgets, with non-response risking unaddressed cost impacts. Dual-regulated firms face compounded effects from FCA CP26/11 (1% fee uplifts).
The 2026/27 Business Plan sets out the workplan for each of our strategic priorities and our strategy to advance our primary and secondary objectives. This yearโs business plan confirms the PRAโs continued focus on safety and soundness and policyholder protection, alongside a proportionate and efficient approach to regulation.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Liste der sanktionierten natรผrlichen Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Taliban in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.07), publiziert.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the launch of Material Matters With SEC Chairman Paul Atkins, a new podcast that provides stakeholders and the investing public with exclusive interviews and insights around the agencyโs policy andโฆ
ESMA launches a call for evidence on restricted subscription and private credit ratings 16 April 2026 Credit Rating Agencies The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, today launched a call for evidence to gather stakeholder views on the purposes, market practices, needs and risks associated with restricted subscription and private credit ratings. ESMA is encouraging all interested stakeholders to share views, data and analysis i...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched a call for evidence on restricted subscription and private credit ratings to gather stakeholder input on their market practices, uses, risks, and potential regulatory gaps under the CRA Regulation. This matters because rising use of these non-public ratings could prompt future clarifications or adjustments to ensure consistent standards with public ratings, impacting credit rating agencies (CRAs) and users reliant on them for regulatory or investment purposes.
What Changed
There are no immediate regulatory changes; this is a fact-finding call for evidence to assess whether adjustments to the CRA Regulation are needed. ESMA seeks views on definitions (e.g., restricted subscription ratings as selectively distributed to limited subscribers with economic interest; private ratings excluded from CRA scope if not distributed to >150 persons), production processes, governance comparability to public ratings, distribution risks, and market needs. Potential future outcomes include enhanced clarity on CRA Regulation application, but none are confirmed yet.
Suggested Considerations
Review the full Call for Evidence document and annexes for specific questions on restricted subscription (Annex I) and private credit ratings (Annex II).
Prepare and submit evidence-based responses addressing key areas: use cases/benefits vs. public ratings, contracting/distribution parties, analytical/governance comparability, transparency impacts, risks/mitigations, and multi-CRA practices.
Provide quantitative data, concrete examples, and rationale; indicate specific questions and alternatives considered.
Submit online by 31 May 2026 using the docx reply form; note responses may be published unless confidentiality requested.
Key Dates
Q2 2026
- ESMA reviews responses to assess potential regulatory adjustments under CRA Regulation
31 May 2026DEADLINE
- Deadline for submitting evidence-based responses, including quantitative data and market examples, via ESMA's online consultation form in docx format
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This is not mandatory rulemaking but a critical opportunity to influence potential CRA Regulation clarifications amid growing private rating use, which could standardize governance/internal controls or expand scope. Firms using or issuing these ratings should engage to mitigate risks of future unaddressed practices leading to enforcement or restrictions; inaction may expose gaps if ESMA identifies inconsistencies with public rating standards.
The Securities and Exchange Commissionโs Small Business Capital Formation Advisory Committee announced that it will hold a meeting on Tuesday, April 28, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. to explore ways to encourage more companies to go public.The meeting will be openโฆ
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a concept release soliciting public comment in support of a comprehensive review of the Consolidated Audit Trail (CAT) and other audit trails and related data sources currently used in the regulation ofโฆ
Under the Consumer Duty, firms must report annually on what their monitoring found about customer outcomes, and what actions theyโll take as a result.Good Consumer Duty Board reports provide clear evidence about outcomes โ helping to turn governance into real change. Boards can ask better questions, hold people to account, and act quickly to make sure they arenโt causing harm or offering poor value. Weโve seen this lead firms to design better products, communicate more clearly and support the...
The FCA has finalised a simpler UK short selling regime that reduces reporting burdens for firms, while maintaining regulatory oversight. Short selling plays an important role in financial markets by supporting price formation, providing liquidity, and facilitating risk management.The new rules follow legislative changes under the Governmentโs repeal and replace programme, which imply that the FCA will publish aggregated data showing the overall size of net short positions in each company rat...
The Artificial Intelligence Consortium (AIC) aims to provide a platform for public-private engagement to further dialogue on the capabilities, development, deployment, use, and potential risks of artificial intelligence (AI) in UK financial services.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Liste der sanktionierten natรผrlichen Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Taliban in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.07), publiziert.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today issued a conditional exemptive order that permits customer cross-margining of cash market positions in U.S. Treasury securities cleared by a registered clearing agency and futures positions in U.S. Treasuryโฆ
AI Analysis
The SEC has issued a conditional exemptive order and approved a proposed rule change by the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC) to enable customer cross-margining between cash U.S. Treasury positions cleared at FICC and futures positions cleared at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), extending a benefit previously limited to clearing members. This development enhances Treasury market liquidity and resilience by allowing dually registered broker-dealers/futures commission merchants (FCMs) to offer more efficient margin calculations to customers, aligning SEC and CFTC efforts in modernizing clearing infrastructure.
What Changed
- Exemptive Order: Provides relief from the SEC's broker-dealer customer protection rule (Rule 15c3-3), permitting dually registered broker-dealer/FCMs that are joint clearing members of FICC and CME...
Rule Change Approval: Approves FICC's filing to incorporate a Third Amended and Restated Cross-Margining Agreement with CME into its Government Securities Division rules, enabling cross-margining at...
Scope Expansion: Shifts from prior restrictions where only clearing members could cross-margin, now extending to eligible customers of qualifying firms, with safeguards for customer fund segregation...
Suggested Considerations
Qualifying Firms: Review and ensure compliance with exemptive order conditions (e.g., customer eligibility, account segregation, risk controls) before offering cross-margining; update internal policies, systems, and customer agreements to support combined margin calculations in futures accounts.
Operational Updates: Implement changes to clearing and margining processes aligned with the Third Amended Cross-Margining Agreement; conduct testing with FICC and CME for customer-level arrangements.
Documentation and Reporting: Maintain records demonstrating adherence to Rule 15c3-3 exemptions and notify customers of new margining options; monitor for CFTC parallel requirements on commingled funds.
Legal/Compliance Review: Assess dual SEC/CFTC registration status and joint membership; consult with counsel on condition-specific interpretations.
Key Dates
April 15, 2026
- SEC issues conditional exemptive order and approves FICC's proposed rule change
Post
April 15, 2026 (prior to Federal Register publication); - Exemptive order and rule approval made available on SEC.gov; related CFTC order on CFTC.gov
TBD (after Federal Register publication)DEADLINE
- Official effective date upon Federal Register publication (no specific comment or implementation deadline specified in announcement)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This enables immediate operational opportunities for margin efficiency but requires swift review of systems and controls to meet conditional safeguards, avoiding customer protection violations under Rule 15c3-3. Firms risk regulatory scrutiny or missed liquidity benefits if unprepared, especially amid ongoing Treasury clearing mandates; proactive adoption supports market resilience goals without mandatory overhaul.
Crypto will be regulated in the UK from October 2027. The FCA is finalising the wider cryptoasset regime, with rules to be published this summer. Parliament has now confirmed which cryptoasset activities will fall within the scope of regulation. Building on that, the FCA is consulting on new guidance to help firms understand how they might be affected by the regulatory regime for cryptoassets.The FCA is seeking feedback on its interpretation of the following regulated cryptoasset activities:i...
ESMA Guidelines on Liquidity Management Tools (LMTs) of UCITS and open-ended AIFs (ESMA34-671404336-1364)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/910 announces the CSSF's application of ESMA Guidelines on Liquidity Management Tools (LMTs) for UCITS and open-ended AIFs, establishing standards for selecting, calibrating, and using LMTs to manage liquidity risks and mitigate financial stability threats. This matters for Luxembourg investment fund managers (IFMs) as it enforces uniform EU-wide supervisory practices under UCITS Directive Article 18a(2) and AIFMD Articles 16(2b)/(2c), holding IFMs primarily accountable for liquidity risk oversight.
What Changed
- Adoption of ESMA Guidelines: CSSF formally applies ESMA's guidelines (ESMA34-671404336-1364), focusing on LMT selection (e.g., redemption gates, suspension of redemptions/dealings, side pockets),...
Calibration Requirements: IFMs must demonstrate fair and reasonable ADT calibration for normal and stressed conditions, including explicit transaction costs and, where appropriate, estimated implicit...
LMT Recommendations: IFMs should select at least one quantitative-based LMT, one ADT, one for normal conditions, and one for stressed conditions; consider additional measures.
Scope Expansion Recommendation: Open-ended SIFs (not under Part II of the 2010 Law) should consider the circular alongside Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/465.
Suggested Considerations
Review and Update Policies: IFMs must select, calibrate, activate/deactivate LMTs per ESMA guidelines, documenting fair/reasonable ADT calibration (e.g., transaction costs, market impact analysis).
Demonstrate Compliance: Be prepared to show regulators liquidity risk management, including at least one quantitative LMT, one ADT, and condition-specific tools; integrate with UCITS/AIFMD requirements.
Risk Management Integration: Ensure primary responsibility for LMTs, with consistent supervisory application; open-ended SIFs to cross-reference with (EU) 2026/465.
Supervisory Preparedness: Maintain records of previous transactions for market impact estimation and overall LMT rationale.
Key Dates
15 April 2026
Publication and CSSF application date of ESMA Guidelines via Circular CSSF 26/910
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Published today (15 April 2026), this imposes immediate supervisory expectations on liquidity risk management for Luxembourg's dominant fund sector, where non-compliance risks enforcement under UCITS/AIFMD. IFMs must promptly review LMT frameworks to avoid supervisory scrutiny, especially amid potential market stress.
The FCA has set out plans to take action against Hartley Pensions Limited and an individual involved at the firm. Hartley was a Self-Invested Personal Pension operator, which went into administration in July 2022. The FCA alleges that Hartley provided it with false and misleading information and improperly withdrew and invested substantial amounts of customersโ pension funds, without their consent, to benefit an individual at the firm.The FCA alleges that the individual dishonestly used the p...
Das Eidgenรถssische Departement fรผr Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine รnderung der Anhรคnge 12 und 14 der Verordnung vom 12. Dezember 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber der Islamischen Republik Iran (SR 946.231.143.6) publiziert.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces updates to Annexes 12 and 14 of the Swiss Ordinance on Measures against the Islamic Republic of Iran (SR 946.231.143.6), effective April 14, 2026, reflecting changes to the SECO Sanctions Management (SESAM) database by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO). It matters because Swiss financial intermediaries must immediately freeze assets of newly or amended sanctioned entities and report to SECO, while continuing AML due diligence under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (GwG), to avoid supervisory enforcement.[User Query]
What Changed
- Amendments to Annexes 12 and 14 of the Ordinance SR 946.231.143.6, updating the list of sanctioned persons, companies, and organizations in the context of Iran sanctions.[User Query]
Updates propagated to the SESAM database, published on the WBF/SECO website.[User Query]
Standard requirements reiterated: Implement prohibitions, freeze assets of sanctioned parties, and report affected business relationships to SECO; SECO reporting does not exempt additional GwG Art.
Suggested Considerations
Screen client portfolios, accounts, and transactions against the updated SESAM database and Annexes 12/14 immediately.
Freeze assets of any newly sanctioned or amended persons/entities without delay.
Report all affected business relationships to SECO promptly.
Conduct enhanced due diligence under GwG Art. 6 for any suspicion; if unresolved, file a suspicious activity report (SAR) with MROS under GwG Art. 9.
Monitor FINMA's MyFINMA portal and website for ongoing updates; update internal sanctions screening systems.[User Query]
Key Dates
13 April 2026
- WBF publishes changes to Annexes 12 and 14 and updates SESAM database.
14 April 2026, 23:00 UTC
- Changes enter into force; asset freezes and prohibitions become mandatory.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Effective immediately (as of April 14, 2026, 23:00 UTC), non-compliance risks FINMA coercive measures under administrative law, including fines, supervisory proceedings, or license revocation. Matters due to frequent Iran sanctions updates (e.g., prior changes in March 2026, October 2025), heightened geopolitical risks post-2015 JCPOA unwind, and dual SECO/MROS reporting obligations amplifying AML exposure.[User Query]
Adverts which used edited, unauthorised clips of Martin Lewis to make misleading claims about average motor finance compensation and used the FCA logo without permission, have been banned by the FCA. Conclusive Financial Ltd (Conclusive), a claims management company (CMC), which also trades as PCP Refunds, was required to remove its advertising and update or take down its website until it complied with the FCA's rules. Conclusive has since removed the banned adverts.The FCA was also concerned...
Warning: Unauthorised Retail Credit Firm Unauthorised Firm Name Finance Advice Help Website Financeadvicehelp.com Email address used contact@financeadvicehelp.com Authorisation in Ireland Finance Advice Help is not authorised to provide retail credit services in Ireland. Notes: Any person wishing to contact the Central Bank with information regarding such firms / persons may telephone (01) 224 5800 or report an unauthorised firm directly to the Central Bank . For more information on how to pr...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has issued a warning notice under section 53 of the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013, identifying "Finance Advice Help" (website: financeadvicehelp.com; email: contact@financeadvicehelp.com) as an unauthorised firm providing retail credit services in Ireland. This matters for compliance professionals as it underscores CBI's proactive enforcement against unauthorised entities, heightening risks of consumer scams and potential liability for authorised firms if clients inadvertently engage with clones or similar frauds.[Source URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/finance-advice-help--central-bank-of-ireland-issues-warning-on-unauthorised-firm]
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement action via a public warning notice. It reinforces existing requirements under the Central Bank (Supervision and Enforcement) Act 2013 (section 53), which empowers CBI to publish names of unauthorised firms offering regulated services like retail credit. No new rules are introduced; it signals ongoing vigilance against unauthorised retail credit providers.[Source URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/finance-advice-help--central-bank-of-ireland-issues-warning-on-unauthorised-firm]
Suggested Considerations
Verify firm status: Use CBI's unauthorised firms search tool before engaging with any retail credit provider (https://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/how-we-regulate/authorisation/unauthorised-firms/search-unauthorised-firms).
Report suspicions: Contact CBI at (01) 224 5800 or via direct reporting portal for any dealings with Finance Advice Help or similar entities.[Source URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/finance-advice-help--central-bank-of-ireland-issues-warning-on-unauthorised-firm]
Educate clients/staff: Disseminate scam protection guidance from www.centralbank.ie/financialscams; implement "SAFE test" for verification.[Source URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/finance-advice-help--central-bank-of-ireland-issues-warning-on-unauthorised-firm]
Monitor clones: Screen for impersonation risks, as seen in related warnings (e.g., Shamrock Lend clone).
Key Dates
14 April 2026
Publication date of warning notice; Immediate public alert on unauthorised status of Finance Advice Help.[Source URL: https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/finance-advice-help--central-bank-of-ireland-issues-warning-on-unauthorised-firm]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ This is a routine CBI warning (one of many in 2025-2026), not targeting authorised firms directly, but it elevates consumer protection and conduct risks. Firms must act promptly to update internal alerts and client advisories to mitigate reputational harm, regulatory scrutiny, or indirect liability from scam exposures; failure could trigger CBI inquiries under conduct rules.
Consumers and businesses could be given greater control over their financial data to help secure better deals, under a vision for open finance published by the FCA. Open finance will unlock the potential for people and businesses to share their financial data securely with a range of financial services providers, helping them access mortgages, investments, savings and pensions. This will give financial services firms a more complete picture of consumersโ and businessesโ finances, enabling mor...
The CFTC secured a U.S. District Court consent order on April 13, 2026, against Florida resident Emir Jesus Matos Camargo and his firm Aureus Revenue Group LLC for commodity pool fraud, including misrepresentations like a fake CFTC license and fund misappropriation, resulting in over $1.3 million in restitution and penalties plus permanent bans. This enforcement action underscores the CFTC's aggressive pursuit of fraud in commodity pools, particularly involving forged regulatory credentials, serving as a stark reminder for firms to verify all licensing claims and protect client funds. Compliance teams must prioritize misrepresentation controls to avoid similar liability, including controlling person exposure.
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements.
Fraud by associated persons of commodity pool operators (CPAs) (CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. ยง 4.41).
Acting as an unregistered commodity pool operator (CPO) (CEA Section 4m(1), 7 U.S.C. ยง 6m).
Controlling person liability for firm violations (CEA Section 13(b), 7 U.S.C. ยง 13c(b)), as applied to Matos over Aureus.[https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9212-26]
Suggested Considerations
Registration verification: Confirm CPO/AP registration status via NFA BASIC (https://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/) before solicitations; prohibit any implication of CFTC "licensing" without proof.
Marketing review: Audit all promotional materials for false claims (e.g., seals, signatures, fictitious licenses); require pre-approval by compliance.
Fund segregation: Implement strict controls on pool participant funds, including third-party custody and daily reconciliations to prevent misappropriation.
Controlling person policies: Document oversight duties for principals; conduct gap analyses for personal liability under CEA Section 13(b).
Training: Mandatory annual training on CEA fraud provisions, with attestations.
Key Dates
September 4, 2024
- CFTC enforcement action filed against Matos and Aureus
April 13, 2026
- U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida enters consent order resolving claims against Matos (action against Aureus remains pending).[https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9212-26]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This action highlights ongoing CFTC enforcement trends in Florida commodity pool fraud but introduces no immediate mandates. It matters for CPOs and APs due to the precedent of high penalties ($666K restitution + $666K CMP, joint/several), permanent bans, and controlling person liability; firms with similar operations face elevated exam/audit risk, especially post-2024 filings. Proactive reviews now can mitigate whistleblower tips or NFA audits.
ESMA releases reporting templates and instructions for the Active Account Requirement 13 April 2026 CCP Market data The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published the reporting templates and instructions for the Active Account Requirement (AAR) reporting under European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3). The new templates set out in detail how entities subject to the AAR should report the required information to ...
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC), which is a forum for discussion of the wholesale foreign exchange market. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England chairs the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC) Operations and Legal Sub-Committees. The FXJSC is made up of market participants, infrastructure providers and the UK financial regulators.
The Bank of England has today published new and updated guidance on how the Bank might implement the UKโs resolution regime in the event of a bank failure.
AI Analysis
The Bank of England (BoE) has published updated operational guides on implementing the UK's resolution regime for failing banks, including new details on transfer resolutions and an alternate bail-in approach using non-transferable contingent beneficial interests, informed by recent failures like Silicon Valley Bank and Credit Suisse. This matters for compliance professionals as it enhances transparency on BoE execution strategies, strengthens cross-border resolvability (e.g., via a US SEC No-Action Letter), and requires firms to align recovery/resolution plans with these operational clarifications to ensure feasibility and credibility under the Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF).[BoE News Release](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2026/april/boe-enhances-resolution-readiness-with-updated-operational-guides)
What Changed
- New Operational Guide to Transfer Resolution: Details BoE's execution of transfers to private sector purchasers or temporary bridge banks, including recapitalisation payments and use of resolution...
Updates to Operational Guide to Bail-in Resolution: Introduces an alternate approach where affected creditors receive non-transferable contingent beneficial interests (simplifying bail-in by...
US SEC No-Action Letter: Confirms non-transferable contingent beneficial interests for US investors need no SEC registration, aiding cross-border bail-in operability.[BoE News...
Suggested Considerations
Assess resolvability: Major firms perform and disclose self-assessments under RAF; address identified barriers or face BoE powers to mandate fixes.
Enhance capabilities: Implement MREL, operational continuity in resolution (OCIR), and Single Customer View for deposits; prepare for recapitalisation or non-transferable interests in bail-in.
Cross-border coordination: US-exposed firms leverage SEC No-Action Letter for bail-in planning; engage BoE on international strategies.[BoE News Release](https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/news/2026/april/boe-enhances-resolution-readiness-with-updated-operational-guides)
Monitor thresholds: Notify BoE/PRA if approaching ยฃ25bn assets or account thresholds.
Key Dates
OngoingDEADLINE
- Firms must maintain resolution packs and MREL compliance; bail-in firms have at least **6 years** (plus up to 2-year extension) to meet end-state MREL, and **minimum 18 months** for additional resolvability requirements
Advance notificationDEADLINE
- Modified insolvency firms forecasting ยฃ25bn assets or transactional account thresholds within 3 years must inform BoE/PRA
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This is guidance, not new rules, but directly impacts resolution plan credibility and RAF assessments, with potential supervisory/enforcement actions for non-alignment (e.g., MREL shortfalls or unresolved barriers). Firms must act proactively to avoid heightened BoE scrutiny, especially post-SVB/Credit Suisse lessons emphasizing bail-in effectiveness and no public fund reliance.
The CFTC obtained a temporary restraining order (TRO) from the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona on April 10, 2026, halting Arizona's criminal enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated designated contract markets (DCMs) offering prediction markets, following CFTC's lawsuit asserting exclusive federal jurisdiction under the Commodity Exchange Act. This development reinforces federal preemption over event contracts, preventing states from applying conflicting gambling or criminal laws, and matters because it shields compliant firms from state-level prosecution while broader litigation against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois proceeds. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9211-26
What Changed
There are no new regulatory requirements or changes imposed by this publication; instead, it documents a court-granted TRO that temporarily blocks Arizona's enforcement of state criminal and gambling laws against CFTC-regulated prediction markets, affirming CFTC's claimed exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts via federal preemption under the Commodity Exchange Act.
Suggested Considerations
Monitor federal court dockets in the District of Arizona for updates on the preliminary injunction hearing and broader cases against other states.
Document compliance with CFTC regulations for event contracts to demonstrate adherence to federal law in any state inquiries.
Review state exposure for prediction market activities, pausing non-federal compliant operations in high-risk states like Arizona pending resolution.
Enhance legal consultations on federal preemption defenses for ongoing or potential state enforcement. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9211-26
Key Dates
March 2026
- Arizona files 20-count misdemeanor criminal case against prediction market platform Kalshi, alleging illegal gambling and election betting
Week prior to April 2, 2026
- CFTC files complaints (with DOJ involvement) against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois seeking declaratory judgments on exclusive jurisdiction and permanent injunctions
April 9, 2026
- CFTC files motion for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) and Preliminary Injunction in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona to halt state enforcement
April 10, 2026
- U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona grants CFTC's requested TRO, barring Arizona from pursuing criminal charges against CFTC-regulated DCMs. (Note: Ongoing litigation timelines for preliminary injunction and permanent relief remain undetermined.)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This rapidly evolving federal-state conflict, with a TRO granted just one day ago (April 10, 2026), creates immediate relief for Arizona-targeted firms but signals heightened litigation risk across states; compliance teams must prioritize jurisdictional mapping for prediction markets to avoid fragmented enforcement, as inconsistent state actions could expose firms to criminal liability despite federal compliance, potentially disrupting operations in a multi-state patchwork. The CFTC's aggressive stance underscores systemic risks from state "weaponization" of preempted laws.
The Financial Services Agency (FSA) and Tokyo Stock Exchange have launched a public consultation on draft revisions to Japan's Corporate Governance Code, with comments due by May 15, 2026. This represents the first major update since 2021 and aims to redirect corporate resource allocation toward growth investments, research and development, and human capital rather than short-term shareholder returns. The revised code will become effective this summer and requires listed companies to submit governance reports by July 2027.
What Changed
The draft revisions introduce several substantive modifications to Japan's corporate governance framework:
Resource Allocation Focus: Boards must continuously examine whether management resources (cash, deposits, real estate, and other assets) are allocated appropriately, with emphasis on growth...
Principles-Based Streamlining: The code has been streamlined to adopt a more principles-based approach, moving from form to substance and reducing prescriptive requirements.
Collective Engagement Promotion: The revisions aim to promote collective and collaborative engagements among investors, strengthening dialogue between companies and investors.
Beneficial Shareholder Transparency: Enhanced transparency requirements regarding the identification of beneficial shareholders.
Suggested Considerations
*For Listed Companies:
*Immediate (by May 15, 2026): Review the draft revisions (Materials 1 and 2) and consider submitting comments during the public consultation period if your organization wishes to influence final provisions.
*Pre-Implementation (Summer 2026): Conduct a comprehensive gap analysis comparing current governance practices against the draft requirements, particularly regarding:
Board processes for examining resource allocation decisions
Documentation of investment policy rationale
Key Dates
Summer 2026
- Official adoption of the revised Corporate Governance Code
May 15, 2026DEADLINE
- Public consultation comment submission deadline (JST)
June 1, 2026
- Anticipated effective date (based on historical pattern; confirmation pending final adoption)
July 2027DEADLINE
- Listed companies must submit governance reports under the new code
ESMA publishes latest edition of its newsletter 10 April 2026 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published today its latest edition of the Spotlight on Markets newsletter. This edition opens with ESMAโs actions to simplify the retail investor journey and make investing more accessible, setting out steps to support retail participation in capital markets. Top news highlights include the publication of t...
AI Analysis
ESMA's latest *Spotlight on Markets* newsletter (edition 42, published 10 April 2026) summarizes recent supervisory, enforcement, and policy actions, emphasizing simplification of retail investor access, high market risks per the first 2026 TRV report, and key publications on transparency, suitability, MiFID II/MiFIR data, and Listing Act compliance.[User Query] This matters for compliance teams as it signals ESMA's priorities in reducing regulatory burdens while enhancing investor protection and market transparency amid a high-risk environment.
What Changed
The newsletter highlights no immediate binding rules but flags forthcoming or proposed changes via publications:
Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities (TRV) Report 2026: Identifies high-risk EU financial markets, urging heightened risk monitoring.[User Query]
Annual transparency calculations for equity and equity-like instruments: Updates pre- and post-trade transparency thresholds, published 27 February 2026.[User Query]
Joint EBA-ESMA consultation on revised suitability assessment: Proposes updates to requirements for banks and investment firms on assessing client knowledge and needs under MiFID II.[User Query]
ESMA proposals to simplify MiFID II/MiFIR obligations on market data: Aims to streamline reporting and data access burdens.[User Query]
Suggested Considerations
Review and implement transparency calculations: Adjust trading systems and disclosures for equity/equity-like instruments per 27 February 2026 publication.
Respond to consultations: Submit feedback on suitability (by 25 May 2026), EMIR 3 (20 April), MAR delays (29 April), CCP collateral (30 April); attend 15 April hearing.
Assess TRV risks: Conduct internal risk reviews aligning with high-risk market warnings; update policies on retail investor journeys and fund costs.[User Query]
Monitor enforcement: Review supervisory actions for peer benchmarks (e.g., similar to prior MFSA review).
Key Dates
27 February 2026
Publication of annual transparency calculations for equity and equity-like instruments
10 April 2026
Release of first 2026 TRV report and newsletter; .
15 April 2026
Public hearing on EBA-ESMA joint guidelines on suitability of management body and key function holders
20 April 2026DEADLINE
Consultation deadline on regulatory standards for post-trade risk reduction services under EMIR 3
29 April 2026
Consultation on MAR Guidelines on delay in disclosure of inside information
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This newsletter compiles ongoing developments rather than enacting immediate rules, but tied consultations (e.g., suitability by 25 May 2026) and recent publications (e.g., transparency calculations) require prompt review to avoid enforcement risks in a high-risk market flagged by TRV.[User Query] It matters for aligning with ESMA's simplification push while preparing for stricter suitability, data, and risk rules, potentially reducing costs but increasing scrutiny on retail protection and transparency.
How we're investing in data and analytics in consumer financeOur goal is regulation that is evidence-based, targeted, and achieves good outcomes for consumers. Thatโs why weโve been using richer datasets and sharper data science to drive better outcomes in the consumer finance market, widen financial inclusion, and support economic growth.This blog post explains one way we've been doing that, in a proof-of-concept undertaken by the team of Isabela Barra, Daniel Bogiatzis-Gibbons, Lawrence Cha...
regarding the โLMT activationโ module in relation to additional liquidity management requirements for Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS, or where applicable their management company, and Luxembourg-authorised AIFMs that manage open-ended AIFs, introduced by the Law of 3 March 2026, transposing Directive (EU) 2024/927 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 March 2024
The 13th AFMGM was convened under the co-chairmanship of H.E. Frederick D. Go, Secretary of the Department of Finance of the Philippines, and H.E. Eli M. Remolona, Jr., Governor of the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas.
The CFTC has filed a motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order against Arizona, alongside coordinated lawsuits against Connecticut and Illinois, to halt state-level enforcement actions against CFTC-regulated prediction market operators. This escalating federal-state jurisdictional conflict centers on whether the Commodity Exchange Act grants the CFTC exclusive authority over prediction markets, preempting state gambling and criminal lawsโa question that legal experts believe could ultimately reach the U.S. Supreme Court.
What Changed
The CFTC's enforcement action establishes several critical legal positions:
Federal Preemption Doctrine: The CFTC asserts that the Commodity Exchange Act grants it exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts and prediction markets, rendering state gambling laws inapplicable...
Scope of Federal Authority: The CFTC claims "clear and longstanding exclusive jurisdiction" to regulate event contracts, positioning prediction markets as commodities derivatives rather than gambling...
Injunctive Relief Sought: The CFTC is requesting both preliminary injunctions (immediate relief) and permanent injunctions (ongoing prohibition) preventing states from enforcing preempted laws...
Declaratory Judgment Framework: The lawsuits seek court declarations that state gambling laws are "unconstitutional and invalid" if applied to prediction markets.
Suggested Considerations
*For CFTC-Registered Prediction Market Operators:
*Immediate Compliance Monitoring: Continue operating under CFTC registration while monitoring court proceedings; do not unilaterally cease operations in affected states pending injunction decisions.
*Legal Coordination: Engage counsel to coordinate with CFTC enforcement efforts and provide evidence of compliance with federal registration requirements.
*Documentation Preservation: Maintain comprehensive records demonstrating compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations to support the federal preemption argument.
*State-Level Engagement: Respond to any outstanding cease-and-desist letters through counsel; do not ignore state enforcement communications, but assert federal preemption defenses.
Key Dates
May 2025
- Arizona issued initial cease-and-desist letter to Kalshi
December 2025
- Connecticut's Department of Consumer Protection issued cease-and-desist letters to Kalshi, Crypto.com, and Robinhood Derivatives
March 2026
- Arizona filed criminal charges against Kalshi executives
April 2, 2026
- CFTC and DOJ filed coordinated lawsuits against Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois
April 9, 2026
- CFTC filed motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order in U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona
A financial stability assessment of Irish hedge funds concludes that the diversity of the sector, and its modest market footprint, limit systemic vulnerabilities. A separate assessment focused on open-ended funds shows that the availability of tools to manage liquidity is now widespread, but with further scope to increase use. Strengthening the financial stability lens in the regulation of the non-bank sector has been โ and continues to be โ a priority for the Central Bank. Speaking at an Iri...
Good morning. I am delighted to join you here this morning โ and thank you to Irish Funds for organising this event. 1 As you know, a key part of our job at the Central Bank of Ireland is to focus on โtail risksโ. Not just what we expect will happen, but what could happen. And the range of possible outcomes that could happen has recently widened considerably. What might have been considered close to unthinkable a few years ago, is no longer so. Unpredictable geopolitical developments โ includ...
The SFC reprimanded and fined Impression Investment Limited (a Type 9 licensed asset manager) HK$2 million for inadequate supervision and internal controls over staff personal trading from 2016-2021, while banning former RO Mr. Liu Shan from the industry for 8 months starting 2 April 2026. This enforcement underscores the SFC's strict enforcement of staff dealing policies and conflict management under the Fund Manager Code of Conduct, highlighting risks to investor confidence from front-running-like activities. Compliance professionals must prioritize robust monitoring to avoid similar sanctions, as policies alone are insufficient without implementation.
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new rule, but it reinforces existing requirements under the Fund Manager Code of Conduct (FMCC) and paragraph 12.2 of the Code of Conduct for Persons Licensed by or Registered with the SFC, mandating licensed corporations to implement and enforce staff dealing policies, including prior approvals, monitoring of personal trades (including related accounts), and conflict mitigation.
Suggested Considerations
Conduct gap analysis: Review staff dealing policies against FMCC and Code of Conduct para. 12.2; ensure prior written approvals, 30-day holding rules, and bans on same-day/same-security trades with managed funds.
Implement/enhance controls: Deploy automated pre- and post-trade monitoring for personal/related accounts; flag same-day trades, IPO overlaps, and price discrepancies.
Senior management accountability: ROs/manager-in-charge must actively supervise; document training on conflicts and policy enforcement.
Audit and remediate: Perform immediate staff account disclosures; test for undisclosed beneficial interests; retain records for SFC inspections.
Training: Mandatory annual sessions on FMCC compliance, with attestations of no external accounts or conflicts.
Key Dates
January 2016
March 2021; Period of staff personal trading breaches investigated by SFC
Prior to 2021
Impression's staff dealing policies not implemented/enforced
1 December 2026; Mr. Liu Shan's 8-month industry ban (ends ~8 months later)
8 April 2026
SFC public announcement of sanctions (today's date marks proximity to ban start)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ This action signals SFC's 2026 focus on staff trading oversight gaps, with fines up to HK$2m and bans for ROs, directly eroding investor trust via perceived front-running. Firms without real-time monitoring risk similar scrutiny, especially post-2021 remediation expectations; non-compliance could trigger "fitness and properness" reviews amid rising enforcement (e.g., multiple 2025-2026 cases).
A survey of banks conducted by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA shows that there is a need for action in addressing digital fraud risks, particularly in the areas of operational risk management and preventing money laundering. FINMA published its findings today in a new guidance.
9 April 2026โฆ On 18 March 2026, the Court of Appeal (CA) upheld the sentences of 36 and 20 yearsโ imprisonment meted out to Mr Soh Chee Wen (also known as John Soh) and Ms Quah Su-Ling respectively for orchestrating an elaborate scheme to manipulate the shares of Blumont Group Ltd, Asiasons Capital Ltd and LionGold Corp Ltd, the largest market manipulation case in Singaporeโs history. In October 2025, the CA had dismissed of their appeals against their convictions.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that David Woodcock has been appointed Director of the Division of Enforcement, effective May 4, 2026. Mr. Woodcock is currently a partner in the Dallas and Washington, D.C. offices of Gibson, Dunnโฆ
AI Analysis
The SEC has appointed David Woodcock, a Gibson Dunn partner and former SEC Regional Director, as the new Director of its Division of Enforcement, effective May 4, 2026, following the abrupt resignation of prior Director Margaret Ryan after six months. This leadership change signals a "significant course correction" under Chairman Paul Atkins, emphasizing investor protection and market integrity over prior aggressive enforcement approaches. Compliance professionals should monitor this closely, as it may shift enforcement priorities, potentially de-emphasizing certain areas like crypto crackdowns while intensifying focus on accounting fraud and financial reporting violations.
What Changed
There are no direct regulatory changes or new requirements in this announcement; it is a personnel appointment rather than a rulemaking or policy shift. However, SEC Chairman Atkins highlighted the Division's ongoing "course correction" to prioritize cases aligned with congressional intent for meaningful investor protection and market integrity, moving away from prior Gensler-era emphases. Woodcock's background in securities enforcement, financial reporting, and audit task forces suggests potential heightened scrutiny in those areas, though no specific mandates are outlined.
Suggested Considerations
Review current exposure to SEC enforcement matters, particularly in financial reporting, accounting, and disclosures, in light of Woodcock's expertise.
Monitor SEC announcements post-May 4, 2026, for signals on evolving priorities, such as reduced crypto focus or enhanced fraud detection.
Enhance internal compliance training on investor protection and market integrity cases, aligning with the stated "course correction."
Engage external counsel familiar with Woodcock's tenure (e.g., Gibson Dunn alumni or Fort Worth Regional Office veterans) for strategic advice.
Key Dates
March 2026
- Prior Director Margaret Ryan resigned after approximately six months in the role amid reported disagreements on enforcement priorities
May 4, 2026
- David Woodcock assumes role as Director of the Division of Enforcement, succeeding Acting Director Sam Waldon
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters because leadership transitions at the Enforcement Division can reshape investigative priorities, resource allocation, and case selection for a team of over 1,000 professionals, influencing enforcement trends across securities violations. While not imposing new obligations, the shift from prior leadershipโcoupled with Atkins' emphasis on targeted investor protectionโcould reduce risks in deprioritized areas (e.g., crypto) but heighten them in core areas like accounting fraud, warranting vigilance ahead of the May 4 effective date.
On 21 November 2025, we imposed restrictions on Bazar Money Transfer Limited (BMTL), preventing it from providing regulated payment services. BMTL is registered with the FCA to provide money remittance services to retail and corporate customers.As BMTL was no longer meeting the conditions for registration as a small payment institution, we acted to impose restrictions to protect consumers, preventing BMTL from carrying out any regulated payment services.Following representations made by BMTL,...
Central Bank of Ireland today published the annual Financial Conditions of Credit Unions Report, which provides an update on the financial performance and position of the sector for the financial year ended 30 September 2025.
The Central Bank of Ireland today announced details of a targeted amendment to the mortgage measures that will exempt certain principal home bridging loans from the Loan-to-Income (LTI) limit . The Loan-to-Value (LTV) limit will continue to apply to these products, and all other elements of the mortgage measures remain unchanged. The amendment recognises that bridging finance products are a feature of the evolving Irish mortgage market and ensures that the regulatory framework adapts appropri...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has announced a targeted amendment exempting certain principal home bridging loans from the Loan-to-Income (LTI) limit while retaining the Loan-to-Value (LTV) limit and all other mortgage measures unchanged, recognizing bridging finance as a growing market feature repaid via property sale proceeds rather than income. This matters for compliance professionals as it enables lenders to offer these short-term products (max 18 months) without LTI constraints, but requires reinforced underwriting, consumer protection, and ongoing CBI monitoring to maintain lending standards.
What Changed
- Exemption from LTI limit: Principal home bridging loansโdefined as short-term loans (maximum 18 months) enabling homeowners to buy a new principal home before selling their current property, repaid...
LTV limit retained: Maximum 90% LTV continues to apply to these loans, alongside the 15% flexibility allowance for first-time/second/subsequent buyer lending.
No other changes: All remaining mortgage measures, including consumer protection rules and lenders' prudent underwriting obligations, stay intact.
Monitoring commitment: CBI will track the exemption's operation within its regular mortgage measures assessments for unintended risks.
Suggested Considerations
Update lending policies: Identify and classify principal home bridging loans (max 18 months, repayment from property sale, no capital repayments required during term) to apply LTI exemption but enforce 90% LTV.
Enhance underwriting: Conduct individual suitability and affordability assessments beyond macroprudential limits; do not rely solely on exemption.
Strengthen consumer protections: Fully inform borrowers of risks (e.g., sale delays, interest costs); ensure products suit circumstances per consumer protection rules.
Internal monitoring and reporting: Track bridging loan volumes within flexibility allowances; prepare for CBI inquiries as part of ongoing assessments.
Staff training and systems updates: Revise origination, disclosure, and compliance systems promptly to operationalize changes.
Key Dates
08 April 2026
Announcement and effective date; CBI press release details the amendment, with immediate application implied for qualifying bridging loans (no explicit phase-in mentioned)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Effective immediately on announcement (08 April 2026), this enables new lending opportunities in a evolving market but demands swift policy tweaks, training, and risk controls to avoid consumer protection breaches or excessive risk-taking, with CBI monitoring for emerging issues. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny, as measures reinforce macroprudential goals amid housing market pressures.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced enforcement results for the fiscal year that ended on September 30, 2025.Central to an effective enforcement program is determining which cases to bring and responsibly stewarding Commissionโฆ
AI Analysis
The SEC's announcement details enforcement results for Fiscal Year 2025 (ended September 30, 2025), highlighting a significant slowdown in actions to 313 casesโthe lowest in a decadeโand $808 million in settlements, down 45% from FY 2024, amid leadership changes and a shift to "back-to-basics" priorities like retail investor protection. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals reduced enforcement volume under new Chair Paul Atkins, potential policy resets (e.g., crypto case dismissals), and a focus on core misconduct like fiduciary breaches and insider trading, influencing risk prioritization and resource allocation.
What Changed
This is not a rulemaking publication introducing new regulations but an annual enforcement summary reflecting operational shifts rather than formal regulatory changes. Key developments include:
Enforcement volume decline: 313 standalone actions (down 27% from 431 in FY 2024), with only 4 new actions against public companies post-January 20, 2025 (93% of 56 public company cases initiated...
Monetary penalties reduced: $808 million in settlements (lowest since 2012) and record-low $108 million in disgorgement.
Policy shifts: Dismissals of high-profile crypto cases (e.g., Coinbase, Binance); new task forces on crypto and cross-border fraud; emphasis on "bread-and-butter" cases like offering fraud, insider...
Leadership and staffing impact: Post-Gensler transition (Uyeda as Acting Chair, Atkins sworn in April 2025); ~15% Enforcement staff reduction; record Q1 actions (200 total, October-December 2024)...
Suggested Considerations
Review and strengthen controls around core risks: insider trading, offering fraud, fiduciary duties, and retail investor disclosures.
Self-assess exposure to legacy Gensler-era cases, especially crypto-related, anticipating potential dismissals or settlements.
Enhance self-reporting, remediation, and cooperation protocols, as SEC continues to credit these in resolutions.
Monitor SEC task forces on crypto and cross-border fraud for emerging priorities.
Update firm-wide risk assessments to deprioritize novel theories (e.g., shadow trading) in favor of traditional misconduct.
Key Dates
October 1, 2024
December 31, 2024; - FY 2025 Q1; record 200 enforcement actions filed
January 20, 2025
- Inauguration Day; marker for post-transition enforcement slowdown (only 4 public company actions afterward)
April 21, 2025
- Paul Atkins sworn in as SEC Chair
September 30, 2025
- End of FY 2025; period covered by the announcement
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - This reflects a transitional slowdown and policy pivot rather than imminent threats or new rules, reducing short-term enforcement pressure but requiring strategic recalibration for sustained "back-to-basics" focus on investor protection. Matters due to signaling under new leadership: firms can reallocate resources from prior high-volume pursuits (e.g., crypto) to core compliance areas, but must prepare for targeted actions on fraud and fiduciary issues amid staffing changes.
Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its directors for breaches of their professional obligations
AI Analysis
The AMF Enforcement Committee sanctioned financial investment advisor Kerdiz Finance et Conseil with a โฌ300,000 fine and its directors Anthony Finck and Marc Peuvrier with โฌ75,000 fines each, plus a 5-year ban on advisory activities, for multiple breaches of professional obligations from 2020-2023. This case underscores AMF's strict enforcement against unauthorized product marketing, conflict of interest mismanagement, product governance failures, and AML shortcomings, serving as a warning for advisors to prioritize client best interests and regulatory compliance. It matters because it highlights personal liability for directors and escalating penalties for systemic procedural lapses.
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not a new regulation, but it reinforces existing AMF requirements under French financial advisor rules (e.g., derived from MiFID II and AIFMD implementations):
Accurate representation: Advisors must not misrepresent authorization status or claim unapproved services like investment services provision.[Source URL:...
Conflict of interest management: Procedures must identify and mitigate risks from commercial/ownership ties (e.g., to Vivat Multitalent group), beyond mere shareholding disclosures.
Product governance: Collect and review product information to ensure investor protection; verify asset managers/depositaries for securities.
Marketing limits: Prohibit advising prohibited securities (e.g., Multitalent AG bonds without French authorization) or high-risk offers like Guyane Agricole exceeding initial contributions.
Suggested Considerations
Immediate review: Audit marketing materials, website, and client communications for accurate authorization claims; cease any unapproved representations.
Enhance procedures: Update conflict of interest policies to fully identify/mitigate risks from promoter ties; implement robust product governance collecting issuer details (e.g., asset managers, depositaries, marketing eligibility in France).
Product due diligence: For all recommended securities/offers, verify French marketing authorization (e.g., AMF registration, prospectus, AIFMD passport); document high-risk features like loss exceeding contributions.
AML/CFT strengthening: Ensure full compliance with due diligence and inspector cooperation; conduct gap analysis against AMF guidelines.
Training and governance: Train directors/staff on personal liability; test procedures via internal audits.
Key Dates
1 January 2020
28 June 2023; Period of breaches investigated
1 April 2026
Date of AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines and 5-year ban
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ This demonstrates AMF's pattern of heavy fines (โฌ300k+ firm, โฌ75k personal) and long bans (5 years) for procedural failures, with director accountability. It matters amid rising enforcement on unauthorized AIF/alternative product marketing (see related cases), risking similar sanctions for non-EU promotions; firms should prioritize audits now to preempt inspections.
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) is warning against WhatsApp groups allegedly run by FPM Frankfurt Performance Management AG and led by a person calling themselves Professor Raik Hoffmann. Consumers are being tricked into investing substantial sums of money and downloading the FPM MIN app. There is no connection whatsoever between any WhatsApp groups and FPM Frankfurt Performance AG or ist actual board member, Raik Hoffmann. This constitutes identity theft.
BaFin warns against offers on the website bahnemanninvest(.)net. There is suspicion that the unknown operators are offering financial services, without the necessary permission. Contrary to the information provided on the website, there is no connection with Dieter Bahnemann Fondsinvest GmbH. This constitutes identity fraud.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns against fixed-term deposit offers sent from the email address martin.segler(at)spar-direkt(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown providers are conducting banking transactions and financial services without the required authorisation. Contrary to the claims made by the unknown operators, Xaver Asset Management GmbH has no connection whatsoever with the offers. This is a case of identity theft.
Das Eidgenรถssische Departement fรผr Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat รnderungen der Verordnung vom 4. Mรคrz 2022 รผber Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces updates to the Swiss Ordinance on Measures in Connection with the Situation in Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72), specifically the removal of 7 natural persons from Annex 8 on March 19, 2026, effective March 20, 2026, 23:00 UTC. It matters for Swiss financial firms as it requires immediate review of sanctions screening processes to lift any prior asset freezes on these delisted individuals while maintaining vigilance against ongoing Ukraine/Russia sanctions risks, ensuring compliance with SECO and FINMA expectations.
What Changed
- Amendment to Annex 8 of SR 946.231.176.72 by the Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) on March 19, 2026, removing 7 natural persons from the sanctions list.
Update to the official Swiss sanctions database SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management), published urgently on SECO's website.
This delisting narrows the scope of asset freeze obligations under the ordinance, but core prohibitions on transactions, asset blocking, and reporting for remaining listed parties persist.
Suggested Considerations
Screen client databases and transaction records against the updated SESAM database to identify and release any asset freezes or restrictions on the 7 delisted persons, confirming no residual sanctions apply.
Report any affected business relationships to SECO as per ordinance requirements; conduct additional due diligence under Art. 6 GwG if suspicions remain, and file SARs with the Money Laundering Reporting Office Switzerland (MROS) under Art. 9 GwG if unresolved.
Update internal sanctions screening tools, policies, and staff training to reflect the SESAM changes; document all reviews for audit trails.
Monitor FINMA's news and MyFINMA for further updates, as lists are continuously revised.
Key Dates
19 March 2026
- WBF amends Annex 8, removing 7 natural persons
20 March 2026, 23:00 UTCDEADLINE
- Changes enter into force; firms must adjust compliance systems accordingly
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate action required post-20 March 2026 to avoid erroneous ongoing freezes (risking client claims) or premature releases (violating sanctions); non-compliance risks fines up to CHF 540,000 or imprisonment, with SECO referrals to prosecutors for severe cases, amid CHF 7.4 billion in frozen assets as of April 2025. This reinforces the need for real-time sanctions monitoring in a dynamic regime aligned with EU/UN measures.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) again warns consumers about โInvesting Inโ and the services it is offering. The unknown operators are now using the additional website investing-in(.)pro. BaFin suspects the operators of this website of offering consumers financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues.ย To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced the agenda and panelists for its April 16, 2026, roundtable on options market structure.The roundtable will be held at the SECโs headquarters at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C., from 9:00 a.m.โฆ
The FCA and Bank of England (Bank) invite expressions of interest from market participants to join a new taskforce. The purpose of this taskforce is to inform the design of our long-term approach to harmonising transaction and post-trade reporting requirements.The taskforce will be comprised of three separate working groups: a main Policy group, supported by a Strategy group and an Architecture group. The working groups will have the following individual objectives: Policy group:Identifying a...
The Money Markets Committee is a forum for market participants and authorities to discuss the UK unsecured deposits and funding market and securities lending and repo markets.
In his latest blog, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf argues that central banks must modernise their digital infrastructure and regulatory frameworks to ensure that central bank money remains the stable foundation of Europe's financial system whilst enabling private sector innovation in a digitally transformed ecosystem.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website brokereins(.)com. BaFin has information that the operators are offering banking business and/or financial services on this website without the required authorisation. The operators are not supervised by BaFin.
We are changing the publication dates of the Decision Maker Panel and Agentsโ summary of business conditions so that they no longer fall on the same day as publication of the Monetary Policy Report
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website crss(.)finance. According to information available to BaFin, the operators are offering financial and cryptoasset services on the website without the required authorisation. The unknown operators of the website claim to be a British company called โCeres Finance Limitedโ. It is not supervised by BaFin. This is a case of identity fraud. BaFin has no information regarding the British co...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website uk-trd(.)investments. According to information available to BaFin, the operators are offering financial and cryptoasset services on the website without the required authorisation. The unknown operators are not supervised by BaFin. They claim to be a company called โUK Trade & Investโ. In communications with customers, the website operators claim to be authorised by the European Financ...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Spectrum Equity Pulse GmbH and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website spectrumequitypulse(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation. The operators claim to be supervised by BaFin and the Deutsche Bundesbank. This is not the case. The certificate provided in this context (โBusiness Licenseโ) is fake.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website green-lmtd(.)com. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services in Germany without the required authorisation. The operators falsely claim to be supervised by the โEuropean Financial Supervisory Authorityโ (FINA EU). There is no such authority; BaFin has already issued a warning to this effect.
ESMA clarifies expectations in the run-up to the launch of EUโs Consolidated Tapes 01 April 2026 Market data Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EUโs financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published Questions and Answers (Q&As) on the onboarding of data contributors to the EUโs Consolidated Tapes (CTs), and on the operational rules for the Consolidated Tape Providers (CTPs). The goal is to increase certainty for all market participants in anticipation of...
AI Analysis
ESMA has issued Q&As clarifying expectations for data contributors onboarding to the EU's Consolidated Tapes (CTs) for equities, bonds, and derivatives, emphasizing pre-go-live cooperation with selected Consolidated Tape Providers (CTPs). This matters because it mandates trading venues and Authorised Publication Arrangements (APAs) to establish data transmission setups ahead of the **01 April 2026** launch, ensuring market transparency under MiFIR while minimizing disruptions. Compliance professionals must prioritize this to avoid supervisory scrutiny from ESMA and National Competent Authorities (NCAs).
What Changed
- Mandatory pre-authorization engagement: Data contributors (trading venues and APAs) must cooperate with selected CTPs *before* formal CTP authorization to set up data transmission, including...
CTP confidentiality obligations: Selected CTPs must implement safeguards for data confidentiality and integrity during preparatory phases.[User Query]
Legal obligation reinforcement: ESMA and NCAs remind that data contribution to CTPs is a binding requirement from CT go-live, tied to MiFIR.[User Query]
No new rules are introduced; this clarifies...
Suggested Considerations
For data contributors: Immediately engage selected CTPs (EuroCTP, fairCT; derivatives post-selection) to agree transmission protocols, conduct connectivity testing, and complete end-to-end testing before 01 April 2026 go-live.[User Query]
For CTPs: Deploy confidentiality/integrity safeguards for pre-authorization data; prepare operational rules per Q&As (accessible via ESMA's online tool).[User Query]
For all firms: Review ESMA Q&As via online tool; update internal policies, IT systems, and vendor contracts for CT compliance; coordinate with NCAs if needed.[User Query]
Document cooperation efforts to demonstrate readiness during ESMA/NCAs supervision.
Key Dates
2025
- ESMA selected fairCT for bonds CTP (authorization ongoing).
22 December 2025
- ESMA selected EuroCTP for equities/ETFs CTP (authorization ongoing)
January 2026
- ESMA launched derivatives CTP selection
11 February 2026DEADLINE
- Deadline for derivatives CTP selection participation requests
01 April 2026
- CTs go-live; mandatory data contribution from trading venues/APAs begins.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ With CT go-live just days away (01 April 2026), failure to complete onboarding risks non-compliance with MiFIR obligations, potential enforcement by ESMA/NCAs, and market access disruptions. This amplifies operational resilience demands amid MiFIR review, affecting data reporting workflows for Capital Markets & Trading firms.[User Query]
BaFin warns against offers on the website calculusinv(.)com and on social media channels such as the โCalculus Investment Academy VIP Yโ group. According to information available to BaFin, Calculus Investments Ltd, which claims to be domiciled in New York and Frankfurt/Main, is providing financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
Application of the Guidelines of the European Securities and Markets Authority for the criteria on the assessment of knowledge and competence under the Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) (ESMA35-24871704-2922)
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/909 specifies how the CSSF applies ESMA's Guidelines (ESMA35-24871704-2922) for assessing **knowledge and competence** criteria under MiCA, targeting staff involved in crypto-asset services. It matters because it enforces MiCA's staff certification requirements, ensuring Luxembourg CASPs meet EU-wide standards for consumer protection and operational integrity amid the full MiCA rollout on 30 December 2024.
What Changed
- Adoption of ESMA Guidelines: CSSF mandates application of ESMA's criteria for evaluating staff knowledge and competence in crypto-asset services, including roles in custody, trading, portfolio...
Assessment Framework: Firms must implement standardized tests and processes to verify staff qualifications, aligning with MiCA Article 62 on CASP authorization, focusing on technical crypto...
No New Standalone Rules: This circular builds on prior CSSF MiCA circulars (e.g., 25/890 on crypto-asset classification), integrating competence checks into licensing dossiers and ongoing supervision.
Suggested Considerations
Assess Staff Competence: Implement ESMA-guided evaluations (e.g., exams, certifications) for all relevant personnel handling crypto services; document results in governance frameworks.
Update Policies and Training: Integrate competence criteria into HR, onboarding, and annual reviews; roll out MiCA-specific training on reporting, breaches, and governance.
Licensing Dossier Enhancement: Include competence attestations in CSSF applications; appoint dedicated compliance/risk officers with verified qualifications.
Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct regular audits, penetration tests, and incident planning; confirm compliance annually via management body statements.
Early CSSF Engagement: Schedule dialogues and info sessions; create MiCA readiness scorecards for board and regulator discussions.
Urgency: High โ With publication today (1 April 2026) and MiCA's CASP regime live since 30 December 2024, firms face immediate supervisory scrutiny during licensing and VASP transitions ending 1 July 2026. Non-compliance risks authorization denial, enforcement, or operational halts, especially as CSSF audits dossiers for competence gaps amid Luxembourg's role as MiCA hub.
Das Staatssekretariat fรผr Wirtschaft (SECO) hat eine รnderung der Liste der sanktionierten natรผrlichen Personen, Unternehmen und Organisationen der Verordnung vom 21. Mรคrz 2025 รผber Massnahmen gegenรผber Personen und Organisationen, die mit den Organisationen ISIL (Da'esh) und Al-Kaida in Verbindung stehen (SR 946.231.08), publiziert.
The CSSF imposed a โฌ20,000 administrative fine on BigRep SE on 1 April 2026 for failing to comply with a CSSF order to publish, disseminate, store on the Officially Appointed Mechanism (OAM), and file its half-yearly financial report as of 30 June 2025, under the Luxembourg Transparency Law of 11 January 2008. This sanction underscores CSSF's strict enforcement of periodic disclosure obligations for issuers with Luxembourg as their home Member State, signaling heightened supervisory scrutiny on timely reporting.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change but an enforcement action under the existing amended Law of 11 January 2008 on transparency requirements for issuers (Transparency Law). Key requirements reiterated include Article 4 (obligation to publish half-yearly financial reports), effective dissemination, storage on the OAM, and filing with CSSF, with CSSF empowered under Article 25(1) to impose fines for non-compliance, considering circumstances per Article 26a. This follows a prior โฌ10,000 fine on the same issuer on 12 January 2026 for initial failure to publish the same report.
Suggested Considerations
Issuers must ensure timely publication of periodic financial reports (half-yearly per Article 4, annual per Article 3) via effective dissemination, OAM storage (e.g., Luxembourg Stock Exchange systems), and CSSF filing.
Respond promptly to any CSSF orders or injunctions to avoid escalated fines.
Implement robust internal controls for reporting calendars, including automated reminders and pre-verification processes.
Review and file any overdue reports immediately upon CSSF notification.
Key Dates
30 June 2025
- Reference date for BigRep SE's half-yearly financial report that was not published
12 January 2026
- Date of initial โฌ10,000 fine for failure to publish the report
1 April 2026DEADLINE
- Date of โฌ20,000 fine for non-compliance with CSSF order on report dissemination, OAM storage, and CSSF filing
1 July 2026DEADLINE
- Deadline to lodge appeal with the Tribunal administratif (three months from 1 April 2026 sanction, per Article 27)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ This enforcement highlights CSSF's proactive verification of disclosures and willingness to impose escalating fines (โฌ10k initial, โฌ20k for non-response, up to โฌ40k in similar cases), but applies to specific non-compliance rather than new rules. It matters for Luxembourg-domiciled issuers as it demonstrates low tolerance for delays, potentially increasing audit focus on reporting processes and reputational risk from public sanctions.
Good morning. Ongoing events in the Middle East are a stark reminder of the challenges policy makers face in a world increasingly characterised by geoeconomic fragmentation. For central banks tasked with preserving price stability, supply shocks pose both analytical and strategic challenges: understanding their persistence, their impacts on supply chains, and their effects on inflation and growth; and determining how to respond when supply and demand move in opposite directions. My speech tod...
The Prohibition Notice (PDF) issued after Mr Buckley signed a Statement of Undisputed Facts, in which he accepted that between 1 February 2021 and 12 December 2023, while he was employed at two different retail intermediaries, he issued invoices to clients directing payment to his personal bank account in place of his employersโ bank details. Mr Buckley also accepted that he misrepresented his financial qualifications to clients during the course of his employment. The Prohibition Notice issu...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has issued an indefinite prohibition to Nicholas (Nick) Buckley from all controlled functions, effective 25 February 2026, following his admission of diverting client payments to his personal account and misrepresenting financial qualifications while at two retail intermediaries from 1 February 2021 to 12 December 2023. This enforcement action underscores the CBI's commitment to the Fitness and Probity Regime, emphasizing integrity in customer-facing roles to maintain public trust. Compliance professionals should note it as a precedent for severe sanctions on dishonesty, potentially influencing vetting and monitoring practices.
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but an enforcement outcome under the existing Fitness and Probity Regime, established by the Central Bank Reform Act 2010, which mandates high standards of competence, integrity, and honesty for individuals in controlled functions. No regulatory changes are introduced; instead, it reinforces enforcement mechanisms, including investigations and prohibitions for breaches, particularly in customer-facing roles where honesty is paramount.
Suggested Considerations
Firms employing similar roles: Immediately review invoicing processes to ensure payments direct only to firm accounts, with segregation of duties and dual approvals for client billing.
Fitness and Probity assessments: Conduct enhanced due diligence on customer-facing staff, verifying qualifications via independent sources and monitoring for personal financial gain conflicts.
Incident reporting: Escalate any suspected integrity breaches (e.g., qualification misrepresentation or fund diversion) to CBI under fitness and probity notification obligations.
Training programs: Update mandatory training on Fitness and Probity Standards (available at https://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/fitness-and-probity), focusing on honesty in client interactions.
Prohibition checks: Screen all controlled function holders against CBI's public prohibitions list before approvals or role changes.
Key Dates
1 February 2021
12 December 2023; Period of Buckley's admitted misconduct (diverting payments and misrepresenting qualifications)
25 February 2026
Effective date of the indefinite prohibition on Buckley performing any controlled functions
01 April 2026
Publication date of the CBI press release announcing the Prohibition Notice
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium โ This is a specific enforcement precedent rather than a new rule, but it signals heightened CBI scrutiny on integrity breaches in retail intermediation, with indefinite bans as a tool to protect consumers. It matters because customer-facing misconduct erodes trust, prompting firms to strengthen controls proactively to avoid similar investigations, especially given CBI Director of Enforcement's warning on accountability. Non-compliance risks firm-level sanctions, reputational damage, and operational disruptions.
Our Financial Policy Committee (FPC) meets to identify risks to financial stability and agree policy actions aimed at safeguarding the resilience of the UK financial system.
CP6/26 from the PRA consults on reforms to the **high loan-to-income (LTI)** lending rules for residential mortgages, building on prior adjustments to the flow limit that caps high-LTI loans (โฅ4.5x borrower income) at 15% of total new lending for larger lenders. This matters for mortgage providers as it aims to balance financial stability, support housing market growth, and adapt macroprudential measures to current economic conditions, potentially influencing lending capacity and risk management ahead of the June 2026 review deadline (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2026/april/high-loan-to-income-lending-consultation-paper).
What Changed
- Review of LTI flow limit: PRA is reviewing the rule limiting new residential mortgages with LTI โฅ4.5x to 15% of total new lending, following FPC recommendations; no final changes proposed yet, but...
Threshold increase (prior update): Flow limit now triggers only for firms issuing โฅยฃ150M in residential mortgages annually (up from ยฃ100M), effective 11 July 2025, exempting ~80 smaller lenders (up...
Interim modification by consent: Firms can apply to disapply the 15% cap temporarily; requires submitting business plans, risk frameworks, and monthly reporting on high-LTI volumes.
Exclusions remain: No LTI limit for re-mortgages (no principal change), lifetime mortgages, or second/subsequent charge mortgages (per historical rules).
Group allocations: Firms in groups can share high-LTI allowances, with record-keeping required.
Suggested Considerations
Apply for modification (if seeking >15% high-LTI): Submit detailed business plan (incl. quarterly high-LTI projections), risk appetite, management frameworks; provide monthly notifications on approvals/completions.
Monitor thresholds: Track rolling 4-quarter mortgage volumes/contracts (โฅยฃ150M and โฅ300 contracts in two periods triggers limit).
Record-keeping: Document high-LTI allowances, group allocations, exclusions.
Respond to consultation: Provide feedback on CP6/26 proposals via PRA channels (deadline not specified in summary; check full paper).
Engage regulators: FCA firms contact FCA for tailored guidance on high-LTI increases.
Key Dates
9 July 2025DEADLINE
PRA offers interim modification by consent applications; firms must submit business plan/risk info within 1 month, then monthly reports (first covering prior 3 months)
11 July 2025
ยฃ150M threshold increase effective
TBD 2026DEADLINE
PRA consultation on permanent LTI flow limit changes (due course post-review)
30 June 2026
Interim modifications expire (or earlier if rules amended)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ Firms near ยฃ150M threshold or planning high-LTI growth must act imminently on modifications (monthly reporting starts soon) to avoid breaches before June 2026 expiry; non-compliance risks enforcement, while opportunities for smaller lenders enhance competitiveness amid housing market pressures (https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/prudential-regulation/publication/2026/april/high-loan-to-income-lending-consultation-paper).
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
The table below provides an overview of the key public enforcement actions taken by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (โMASโ) from January to March 2026.
AI Analysis
This MAS publication summarizes key public enforcement actions in Q1 2026, focusing on prohibition orders (POs) against individuals for investor fraud and money laundering, plus a joint operation against a licensed firm for AML failures and related offences. It matters as it underscores MAS's aggressive enforcement on financial crime, individual accountability, and firm controls, signaling heightened scrutiny to protect Singapore's financial centre integrity.[MAS publication]
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change document but a retrospective enforcement summary; no new requirements are imposed. It highlights MAS's ongoing application of existing powers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022 (FSMA), Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act 1992 (CDSA), and related frameworks, emphasizing deterrence via POs, composition penalties, civil penalties, and criminal referrals.[MAS publication] Related context shows MAS reinforcing AML/CFT expectations, such as robust controls, senior management oversight, and escalation of...
Suggested Considerations
Conduct immediate AML/CFT control gap assessments, focusing on customer due diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, source-of-funds verification, and suspicious transaction reporting (STR) timelines; integrate proliferation financing (PF) risks.
Enhance senior management oversight and accountability, ensuring compliance functions are resourced and independent; review director/representative conduct for fraud or ML risks.[MAS publication]
For CMS licensees and LFMCs: Update risk assessments for high-risk clients (e.g., trusts, beneficial ownership), automate quarterly reporting (e.g., QDC for mandates >SGD 500m), and train staff on accelerated STRs.
Perform thematic reviews of past flagged transactions and escalate unresolved suspicious activities to avoid composition penalties or POs.
All FIs: Prepare for heightened MAS inspections by documenting governance, including liquidity frameworks and cyber/AI risks tied to financial crime.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High โ This reinforces MAS's "evergreen" priorities on AML/CFT and market abuse, with rapid escalation to criminal probes, asset seizures, and long POs (up to 16 years), amid ongoing investigations like Capital Asia.[MAS publication] Firms risk supervisory actions, penalties (e.g., S$27.45m on FIs in 2025), and reputational damage, especially with 2026 priorities amplifying scrutiny on controls and reporting.