The Securities and Exchange Commission today adopted final rule and form amendments to reflect the requirements of the recently enacted Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (HFIA), which will increase transparency into the holdings and transactions…
AI Analysis
The SEC adopted final rules on February 27, 2026, implementing the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (HFIA), which extends Section 16(a) beneficial ownership reporting requirements to directors and officers of foreign private issuers (FPIs) with Exchange Act Section 12-registered equity securities, effective March 18, 2026. This aligns FPI insiders' disclosure obligations with those of U.S. domestic issuers, enhancing market transparency while exempting >10% holders from reporting. Compliance professionals must prioritize preparation as the deadline approaches in two weeks from today (March 3, 2026).
What Changed
Extension of Section 16(a) Reporting: Directors and officers of FPIs must now file Forms 3 (initial beneficial ownership), 4 (changes in ownership), and 5 (annual summary) electronically and in English, covering holdings and transactions in the FPI's equity securities.
Rule Amendments:
- Rule 3a12-3(b): Removes full Section 16 exemption for FPI insiders; retains exemptions only for Section 16(b) short-swing profits and Section 16(c) short-selling prohibitions.
- Rule 16a-2: Explicitly excludes >10% beneficial owners of FPI equity from Section 16(a) reporting.
Form Updates: Forms 3, 4, and...
What You Need To Do
For FPIs and Insiders
Training and Policies
Systems Preparation
Monitor Exemptions
Key Dates
December 18, 2025HFIA enacted into law.
February 27, 2026SEC adopts final rules (ahead of 90-day mandate).
March 18, 2026Effective date; directors/officers of existing FPIs must file initial Form 3; new directors/officers file within 10 days of appointment; ongoing Forms 4 within 2 business days of transactions.DEADLINE
OngoingAnnual Form 5 for unreported transactions; adopting release published in Federal Register (date TBD).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical – With the March 18, 2026, effective date just two weeks away (as of March 3, 2026), non-compliance risks SEC enforcement, including public disclosure failures and potential civil penalties under Section 16. This materially heightens governance burdens for FPIs, demands immediate system/process overhauls, and aligns foreign insiders with U.S. standards to prevent opacity in cross-border listings.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Services Agency of Japan (FSA) convened the Spring SEC-FSA Financial Regulatory Dialogue in Tokyo on Feb. 27, 2026.The SEC–FSA Dialogue builds upon longstanding efforts between the two…
New Q&As available 27 February 2026 CCP Digital Finance and Innovation Financial reporting Issuer disclosure Transparency The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published or updated the following Questions and Answers: European crowdfunding service providers for business Use of fiduciary (nominee) structures in equity crowdfunding (2601) Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA) Clarification on Withdrawal Requirements under Article 7...
AI Analysis
ESMA has published or updated multiple Q&As covering European crowdfunding, MiCA for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), EMIR for central counterparties (CCPs), and Transparency Directive requirements on financial reporting and alternative performance measures (APMs). These updates provide clarifications on operational, reporting, and disclosure obligations, enhancing supervisory convergence and compliance certainty amid evolving EU regulations like MiCA and IFRS 18. Compliance professionals must prioritize these to avoid enforcement risks, particularly with upcoming effective dates in 2027.
What Changed
Crowdfunding: New Q&A (2601) on use of fiduciary (nominee) structures in equity crowdfunding, clarifying permissible structures for service providers.
MiCA (CASPs): Updates include clarification on withdrawal requirements under Article 75 (2320); fixed overheads calculation (2349); interests from client funds at credit institutions (2486); fiat payouts in exchange services (2550); overlap between crypto-asset offers and placing (2551); and Title II requirements for trading platforms (2552).
EMIR (CCPs): New Q&As on AAR threshold calculation (2418, 2779), AAR representativeness obligation...
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Crowdfunding firms
CCPs/counterparties
Issuers/reporters
Key Dates
27 February 2026- Publication date of new/updated Q&As on crowdfunding, MiCA, EMIR, and Transparency Directive.
1 January 2027- Effective date for new Q&A on IFRS 18 & APMs interaction (2775) and updates to APM-related Q&As (1868, 1874, 1875, 1877).
31 December 2027- Deadline for trading platform operators under MiCA to ensure compliant white papers for legacy tokens (related context from prior MiCA Q&As).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - These Q&As address supervisory priorities in high-risk areas like crypto (MiCA) and CCP resilience (EMIR), with imminent 2027 deadlines for reporting changes aligning to IFRS 18. Non-compliance risks fines, authorization delays, or supervisory actions, especially as ESMA emphasizes convergence (e.g., AAR briefing). Firms in crypto/digital assets face heightened scrutiny amid MiCA rollout, while reporters must adapt quickly to avoid disclosure breaches.
In enforcement proceedings against MBaer Merchant Bank AG that FINMA concluded three weeks ago and which were recently pending before the Swiss Federal Administrative Court, FINMA had withdrawn the bank's licence. As part of the proceedings, FINMA ascertained that the bank does not have an adequate structure in place for combating money laundering, thus enabling clients to circumvent official asset freezes. The bank has now withdrawn its appeal against the FINMA proceedings, meaning that FINM...
Katharine Braddick CB appointed as the next Deputy Governor for Prudential Regulation at the Bank of England and Chief Executive of the Prudential Regulation Authority, succeeding Sam Woods when his term ends in June 2026.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website midv-lim(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the operator Midvest Limited from Manchester, UK, is providing financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
In his latest blog, the Governor Gabriel Makhlouf reflects on the publication of the Regulatory and Supervisory Outlook 2026 and the recent Access to Cash report.
This statement provides an early indication to industry of the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA) intent to launch the next Life Insurance Stress Test (LIST) exercise in January 2028.
Speech by Nikhil Rathi, FCA chief executive, at the Goldman Sachs EMEA Head of Trading conference 2026. And as we roll with the punches, we also shouldn’t sell ourselves short.We gained ground last year - London just one point behind New York in the latest Global Financial Centres Index.There is understandable focus on equities market share and listings, where we have delivered far-reaching regulatory reforms.But on FX trading, international debt issuance, OTC derivatives, parts of commoditie...
Supervision Sustainable Finance Marketing Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies The AMF publishes the findings of its inspections on the consideration of client sustainability preferences
ESMA consults on post-trade risk reduction services under EMIR 3 26 February 2026 Post Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has launched a consultation on the requirements for how post-trade risk reduction (PTRR) services can benefit from the conditioned exemption from the clearing obligation introduced under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3). ESMA is seeking feedback on several elements of the ...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched a consultation on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) that establish requirements for **post-trade risk reduction (PTRR) services** to qualify for a conditioned exemption from the mandatory clearing obligation under EMIR 3. This framework is critical because it balances market efficiency gains from risk reduction tools against systemic risk concerns, requiring compliance professionals to understand new operational, transparency, and monitoring requirements before the standards take effect.
What Changed
The draft RTS introduce a structured framework governing how PTRR services operate under the clearing obligation exemption:
*Eligible Service Types
The standards focus on three primary PTRR service categories: compression, portfolio rebalancing, and basis risk optimisation**. ESMA acknowledges that market practices may evolve, building flexibility into the framework for future service innovations.
*Core Requirements for Exemption Qualification
PTRR service providers must demonstrate:
Market risk neutrality in PTRR exercises—transactions must not alter the overall market risk profile of...
What You Need To Do
*For PTRR Service Providers
*Assess current operations against proposed RTS requirements, particularly regarding market risk neutrality and risk reduction thresholds
*Review algorithm safeguards and execution protocols to ensure compliance with transparency and non-discrimination standards
*Establish record-keeping systems capable of documenting PTRR exercises and demonstrating exemption qualification
*Prepare monitoring capabilities to support NCA oversight and supervisory reporting
Key Dates
26 February 2026- ESMA launches consultation
20 April 2026- Deadline for stakeholder feedback submissionsDEADLINE
Q2 2026- ESMA considers feedback received and prepares final report
Q4 2026- Draft RTS submitted to the European Commission
ESMA issues a supervisory briefing on algorithmic trading 26 February 2026 Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, today published a supervisory briefing to support consistent supervision of algorithmic trading across the EU. The briefing provides National Competent Authorities (NCAs) with practical tools and clarified expectations for supervising firms engaged in algorithmic trading under MiFID II. It focuses on key a...
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced it will hold a roundtable on March 4 to discuss private market valuations and responsible retailization.The roundtable will be hosted by the Division of Investment Management from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. ET…
The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) announced today that it considers MBaer Merchant Bank AG to be a financial institution of primary money laundering concern. FINMA is in contact with the bank and FinCEN in connection with the case. The enforcement proceedings previously concluded by FINMA against the bank are currently pending before the Federal Administrative Court. FINMA has appointed an audit agent at the bank.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
The Bank's Court of Directors acts as a unitary board, setting the organisation's strategy and budget and taking key decisions on resourcing and appointments. Required to meet a minimum seven times per year, it has five executive members from the Bank and up to nine non-executive members.
Der Bundesrat hat am 25. Februar 2026 beschlossen, die weiteren Massnahmen des 19. Sanktionspakets der Europäischen Union (EU) gegenüber Russland zu übernehmen. Die neuen Massnahmen treten am 26. Februar 2026 in Kraft.
AI Analysis
Switzerland's Federal Council adopted additional measures from the EU's 19th sanctions package against Russia and Belarus on February 25, 2026, effective immediately on February 26, 2026, expanding asset freezes to approximately 2,600 persons, entities, and organizations. This matters for Swiss financial intermediaries as it introduces new prohibitions on crypto services to Russian nationals and firms, transactions with ruble-pegged stablecoins like "A7A5", and extended bans on specialized messaging services for payments, alongside trade restrictions, requiring urgent asset screening and reporting to SECO.
What Changed
Crypto Restrictions: Complete ban on providing any crypto services to Russian nationals and companies; prohibition on transactions involving specific ruble-backed crypto assets, such as the stablecoin "A7A5".
Payment Systems: Expansion of bans on using certain specialized messaging services for payment traffic.
Trade/Goods Bans: Expanded list of goods contributing to Russia's military/technological strengthening, including metals for weapon systems, fuel production products, and acyclic hydrocarbons (key revenue source for Russia); additional goods added to purchase/import bans.
Sanctions...
What You Need To Do
Implement all prohibitions immediately
Screen and freeze assets of sanctioned persons/entities (~2,600 total); report affected business relationships to SECO
Conduct additional due diligence under Art
Update sanctions screening tools, client onboarding, and transaction monitoring for new crypto/trade restrictions; review exposures to energy/finance goods listed
Key Dates
26 February 2026- New measures from EU 19th sanctions package enter into force in Switzerland.
12 December 2025- Initial adoption of partial 19th package measures, adding 64 persons/organizations to Swiss sanctions list.
13 December 2025- Entry into force of December 2025 sanctions expansions (related prior update).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Critical - Effective today (26 February 2026), requiring immediate asset freezes, service halts, and SECO reporting to avoid violations punishable by fines up to CHF 540,000 or 5 years imprisonment (severe cases referred to federal prosecutor); GwG suspicions add AML reporting layers with CHF 100,000 fines for non-reporting. Crypto bans directly target growing evasion risks, amplifying exposure for digital asset firms amid Russia's war economy circumvention tactics.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat eine Änderung des Anhangs der Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2025 über Massnahmen gegenüber Sudan (SR 946.231.18) publiziert.
AI Analysis
This FINMA publication announces an update to the Swiss sanctions list for Sudan following changes by the UN Sanctions Committee on February 24, 2026, directly incorporated into Switzerland's SESAM database by SECO on February 25, 2026. It matters because financial intermediaries must immediately freeze assets of newly listed parties and report to SECO, while continuing AML due diligence under the GwG (Anti-Money Laundering Act), to avoid enforcement risks from non-compliance with Embargo Act (EmbG) obligations.
What Changed
The UN Sanctions Committee for Sudan amended its list of sanctioned natural persons, companies, and organizations on February 24, 2026.
SECO updated the SESAM (SECO Sanctions Management) database and published the changes on its website on February 25, 2026.
This triggers direct applicability in Switzerland under the Federal Council's 2016 ordinance for automatic adoption of UN sanctions lists, amending Annex of SR 946.231.18 (Ordinance on Measures against Sudan).
Financial intermediaries are required to implement prohibitions, freeze assets, and report affected business relationships to...
What You Need To Do
Screen client portfolios, accounts, and transactions against the updated SESAM Sudan list via SECO's website or MyFINMA notifications
Freeze (block) assets of any matches and implement transaction prohibitions per the ordinance
Report affected business relationships to SECO promptly
Conduct additional due diligence under Art
Monitor FINMA's sanctions page for ongoing updates: https://www
Key Dates
February 24, 2026- UN Sanctions Committee amends Sudan list.
February 25, 2026- SECO updates SESAM database and publishes on its website; changes directly applicable in Switzerland.
Immediate (upon publication)- Financial intermediaries must freeze assets and report to SECO; no fixed deadline specified, but "unverzüglich" (without delay) for GwG AML reporting if suspicions persist.DEADLINE
Urgency: High - Changes are directly applicable with no grace period, requiring immediate asset freezes and reporting to mitigate FINMA enforcement risks (e.g., coercive measures under administrative law). Non-compliance exposes firms to supervisory sanctions, reputational damage, and potential criminal liability under EmbG/GwG, especially amid frequent UN list updates (e.g., recent February 18 change). Firms with Sudan exposure or high-risk clients must prioritize automated screening tools and training.
The Central Bank has today published its Regulatory & Supervisory Outlook 2026 , which sets out its latest assessment of the risk landscape facing the financial sector and the supervisory work it will undertake in response. This follows on from the Governor’s letter to the Tánaiste on the economic outlook and regulatory priorities in January . This is the third year of the report, which continues to be set against a backdrop of a changing, uncertain and increasingly complex external environme...
AI Analysis
The Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) has published its **Regulatory & Supervisory Outlook 2026**, outlining priorities shaped by geoeconomic fragmentation, technological acceleration, and elevated risks like operational resilience, cyber threats, data/AI, and consumer protection. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals intensified supervisory scrutiny, including desktop and onsite inspections, across Ireland's financial sector to ensure resilience and adaptability amid uncertainties.[https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/press-release-central-bank-sets-out-its-regulatory-and-supervisory-priorities-26-february-2026][https://www.ogier.com/news-and-insights/insights/regulatory-outlook-2026-the-central-bank-of-ireland-s-priorities-explained/]
What Changed
No new binding regulatory requirements are introduced in this publication, which serves as a strategic outlook rather than enforceable rules. Key shifts in risk assessment include elevated operational risks (due to geopolitics, digitalisation, complex models), increased asset valuation/market risks, and rising data/models/AI risks, while inflation/interest rate risks have decreased.
What You Need To Do
Conduct robust scenario testing and risk assessments for operational resilience, cyber threats, credit/market/liquidity risks, and document outcomes within compliance monitoring programs
Implement revised CPC by 24 March 2026, assessing scope changes and business impacts
Enhance financial crime controls, including fraud victim support, scam awareness, and market abuse detection; monitor AMLA developments
Embed ESG/climate risks into governance, risk management, and business models, preparing for SFDR 2
Review AI/data/models usage and operational frameworks for supervisory inspections; engage with CBI Innovation Sandbox if applicable
Key Dates
24 March 2026- Revised Consumer Protection Code (CPC) takes effect, following 12-month lead-in; firms must ensure full implementation.[https://www.ogier.com/news-and-insights/insights/regulatory-outlook-2026-the-central-bank-of-ireland-s-priorities-explained/]DEADLINE
H1 2026- CBI consultation on new Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Framework.[https://maples.com/regulatory-round-up/central-bank-of-ireland-update-and-supervisory-approach-for-2026-fund-service-providers][https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/regulation/transforming-regulation-and-supervision/regulating-supervising-well-a-more-effective-and-efficient-framework.pdf]
2026-2027- Ongoing desktop/onsite reviews on operational resilience, ESG/climate, and supervisory priorities across sectors.[https://www.ogier.com/news-and-insights/insights/regulatory-outlook-2026-the-central-bank-of-ireland-s-priorities-explained/]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This outlook directly previews intensified 2026 supervision, with operational/cyber resilience and consumer protection as "key concerns" likely triggering unannounced inspections and enforcement. Firms risk findings on outdated resilience testing or CPC gaps, especially amid elevated risks; proactive alignment now prevents remediation costs and sanctions, given CBI's efficiency roadmap and international...
The Payments Vision Delivery Committee (the Committee) has published the Payments Forward Plan (the Plan). Read the Plan on GOV.UKThe Committee comprises:HM TreasuryBank of EnglandFinancial Conduct AuthorityPayment Systems RegulatorThe Plan sets out upcoming initiatives across retail and wholesale payments, including elements of digital assets. Recent publications on open banking, stablecoins and contactless limits, alongside the initiatives in the Plan, show the high level of activity across...
AI Analysis
The Payments Vision Delivery Committee—comprising HM Treasury, Bank of England, FCA, and Payment Systems Regulator—has published the **Payments Forward Plan**, a three-year regulatory roadmap for retail, wholesale payments, and digital assets, aligning with the UK's National Payments Vision for a trusted, innovative ecosystem. This matters for compliance teams as it provides sequencing and milestones for multiple initiatives, enabling proactive planning amid high regulatory activity, including PSR consolidation into FCA and infrastructure upgrades. It signals coordinated efforts to boost competition, resilience, and innovation while minimizing sector capacity strain.[FCA publication]
What Changed
No immediate binding regulatory changes are imposed by the Plan itself; it is a forward-looking roadmap outlining planned initiatives rather than new rules. Key elements include:
Modernisation of payments framework: Consolidation of PSR into FCA, with HMT consultation response in Q1 2026; data/operational enhancements to Faster Payments and Bacs by end-2026.
Infrastructure upgrades: Short-term resilience improvements to Faster Payments and Bacs (end-2026); exploration of regulated stablecoins for on-chain settlement (H1 2026).
Safeguarding enhancements: FCA Supplementary Regime effective May...
What You Need To Do
Review the full Plan on GOV.UK (https
Engage proactively
Stablecoin firms
Monitor and plan
Internal audit
Key Dates
Q1 2026 - HMT consultation response on PSR consolidation into FCA.
Jan-Apr 2026 - FCA engagement with sector on Supplementary Safeguarding Regime.
Feb-Mar 2026 - Independent assessment of proposals for standards setting body.
Spring 2026 - HMT update on Consumer Credit Act reform.
18 January 2026 - Deadline for stablecoin issuers to apply to FCA regulatory sandbox(related push for innovation).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This is a planning document, not enforceable rules, but its milestones trigger near-term actions (e.g., Q1 2026 engagements, May 2026 safeguarding). It matters because it coordinates high-activity areas like PSR-FCA merger and stablecoins, reducing surprises but demanding resource allocation for innovation/resilience amid sector capacity constraints. Firms delaying review risk missing input opportunities or readiness gaps, especially with VRP/stablecoin momentum.
amending Directives 2006/43/EC, 2013/34/EU, (EU) 2022/2464 and (EU) 2024/1760 as regards certain corporate sustainability reporting requirements and certain corporate sustainability due diligence requirements
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has evidence indicating that Smart IT Global Limited, Hong Kong, is offering several capital investments to the public in Germany. This includes two forms of profit participation loans, which are being offered under the names “smart it World” and “smart it Sprint”. Furthermore, another investment is currently being marketed that offers the prospect of assets in the form of a cash settlement in return for the temporary provision of money (“sm...
According to information available to the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), unknown persons purporting to work for Adams Street Partners LLC or its Munich-based subsidiary Adams Street (Europe) GmbH are using WhatsApp groups and chats to contact investors. The groups are purportedly run by a partner of the firm who is described as the “Project Manager of ASP Investment Management Company”. There is no connection whatsoever between these groups and Adams Street Partners LLC, Ada...
Reply at Committee of Supply 2026 on Adequate Provision of ATMs and VTMs, Mandating the Acceptance of Cash, Sustainability of EQDP and Insurance for Persons with Disabilities
The CFTC Enforcement Division issued an advisory on February 25, 2026, detailing two enforcement cases involving illegal trading on prediction markets (event contracts) traded on KalshiEX, a Designated Contract Market. The advisory clarifies that the CFTC maintains full enforcement authority over prediction markets and will prosecute violations including insider trading, market manipulation, and fraud—establishing critical compliance expectations for platforms and traders in this emerging asset class.
What Changed
The advisory does not introduce new rules but rather reaffirms existing CFTC enforcement authority over prediction markets and clarifies the scope of prohibited conduct:
Insider trading/misappropriation: Trading based on material nonpublic information obtained through a breach of fiduciary duty or pre-existing duty of trust and confidence (Section 6(c)(1) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Regulation 180.1(a)(1) and (3))
Fraud and manipulation: Use of manipulative schemes or artifices to defraud, including trading in contracts where the trader has direct or indirect influence over the...
What You Need To Do
*For Prediction Market Platforms (DCMs)
*Implement robust surveillance systems to detect trading by individuals with material nonpublic information or direct/indirect influence over contract outcomes
*Establish clear trading prohibitions in exchange rules addressing:
Trading in contracts where the trader has influence over the outcome
Trading based on material nonpublic information obtained through breach of duty
Key Dates
February 25, 2026- CFTC Enforcement Division issues Prediction Markets Advisory
May 2025- First enforcement case (political candidate trading incident) identified and resolved by Kalshi
August-September 2025- Second enforcement case (YouTube editor trading incident) identified and resolved by Kalshi
No specific future deadlines- Advisory does not establish new compliance deadlines; it clarifies existing obligationsDEADLINE
The EBA and ESMA consult on revised suitability assessment requirements for banks and investment firms 25 February 2026 Investor protection The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) today launched a consultation on the revised joint guidelines on the assessment of the suitability of members of the management body and key function holders . The revised guidelines form part of a broader package designed to harmonise suitability assessments and...
AI Analysis
The EBA and ESMA have launched a consultation on revised joint guidelines updating suitability assessments for management body members and key function holders in banks and investment firms, incorporating new requirements from the revised CRD and MiFID II to enhance harmonization and supervisory convergence. This matters for compliance professionals as it introduces mandatory assessments for additional roles, strengthens AML/CFT links, and includes simplifications to reduce burdens, potentially impacting governance processes once finalized and replacing the 2021 guidelines.
What Changed
Incorporation of revised CRD requirements for large institutions, including ex-ante applications where authorities perform ex-post assessments, and mandatory suitability assessments for key roles like heads of control functions and chief financial officers.
Expanded application to CRD-covered entities and MiFID II investment firms, with further specifications for third-country branches.
Strengthened integration with AML/CFT framework, providing guidance on identifying reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing risks during assessments.
Introduction of targeted...
What You Need To Do
Review full consultation papers on EBA (https
Assess current suitability processes against new requirements (e
For large institutions, evaluate EBA RTS on documentation and align internal templates (e
Participate in public hearings on 15 April 2026 if relevant
Plan governance updates, including ongoing monitoring of collective/individual suitability and corrective measures
Key Dates
25 May 2026- Deadline for submitting comments on joint guidelines and EBA RTS.DEADLINE
15 April 2026, 14:00-15:30- Public hearing on joint guidelines.
15 April 2026, 15:30-16:30- Public hearing on EBA RTS.
Post-25 May 2026- EBA publishes all contributions (unless requested otherwise).
TBD (post-consultation)- Revised guidelines enter into force, repealing 2021 guidelines.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - As a consultation launched today (25 February 2026), firms have ~3 months to engage, but final guidelines will repeal existing ones, mandating process updates for core governance/AML functions in banks and investment firms; delays risk non-compliance with harmonized EU standards, especially for large institutions facing RTS on documentation. Matters due to expanded scope (e.g., CFOs, third-country branches) and AML ties, amplifying fit-and-proper regime enforcement amid supervisory convergence push.
ESMA sets out clearing thresholds under EMIR 3 25 February 2026 Post Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published its draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) setting out new and revised clearing thresholds (CTs) under EMIR 3. The proposed thresholds ensure continuity in the coverage of systemic risk in over‑the‑counter (OTC) derivative markets while avoiding unnecessary complexity and additional compliance ...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website ultramarin-capital(.)com. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website of offering consumers financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung WBF hat Änderungen des Anhangs 8 der Verordnung vom 4. März 2022 über Massnahmen im Zusammenhang mit der Situation in der Ukraine (SR 946.231.176.72) publiziert.
AI Analysis
On February 23, 2026, Switzerland's State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) updated Annex 8 of the Ukraine Sanctions Ordinance (SR 946.231.176.72), with changes taking effect on February 24, 2026 at 11:00 PM UTC. This represents the latest iteration of Switzerland's Russia sanctions regime, requiring financial intermediaries to immediately implement new prohibitions, freeze assets of designated persons, and report affected business relationships to SECO—with mandatory additional due diligence under anti-money laundering law if suspicions cannot be resolved.
What Changed
The February 2026 update to Annex 8 of the Ukraine Sanctions Ordinance introduces modifications to Switzerland's designated persons and entities list related to Russia sanctions. While the specific additions are not detailed in the available materials, this follows the pattern established by the December 12, 2025 expansion, which added:
22 natural persons and 42 companies/organizations subject to asset freezes and supply prohibitions
116 vessels (primarily tankers in Russia's shadow fleet circumventing oil price caps) subject to purchase, sale, and service prohibitions
45 companies in third...
What You Need To Do
*Implement all prohibitions specified in updated Annex 8 across all business lines and customer relationships
*Freeze assets of all newly designated natural persons and entities; block transactions with designated entities
*Report to SECO all affected business relationships within required timeframes, documenting:
Customer identification and beneficial ownership
Transaction history with designated parties
Key Dates
February 23, 2026– SECO publishes Annex 8 amendments on its website
February 24, 2026, 11:00 PM UTC– Changes take effect; financial intermediaries must immediately implement all prohibitionsDEADLINE
H2 2026– New organizational obligations under revised Money Laundering Act (GwG) requiring sanctions violation prevention measures take effect
The FCA has chosen 4 companies to test how their stablecoin services work with proposed regulation in a safe environment. The stablecoins cohort is part of our commitment to supporting growth and innovation in UK financial services. 20 applications were received and the FCA has chosen the following firms:Monee Financial TechnologiesReStabiliseRevolutVVTXThe Regulatory Sandbox programme allows firms to trial stablecoin products in real world conditions with appropriate safeguards. It will help...
Lenders could have access to more comprehensive information to support lending decisions, under new proposals by the FCA. The FCA is consulting on designating certain credit reference agencies (CRAs). If a lender shares credit information with one designated consumer CRA, it would be required to share it with them all.The changes aim to close gaps in consumers’ credit files and ensure these more accurately reflect people’s financial circumstances.Alison Walters, director of consumer finance a...
CP4/26 proposes targeted amendments to UK Solvency II own funds rules in the PRA Rulebook, addressing inconsistencies, clarifying requirements, and restating EU guidelines for better accessibility. These updates matter as they reduce regulatory burden, enhance clarity, and align rules with market practices, supporting PRA objectives of firm safety, policyholder protection, and competitiveness without introducing new risks.
What Changed
Amendments to prior permission requirements for repaying or redeeming Tier 1 and Tier 3 own funds instruments, clarifying application to items classified under own funds permissions.
Clarification that Tier 2 basic own funds items can cover 20% of the Minimum Capital Requirement (MCR), while Tier 2 Ancillary Own Funds cannot.
Requirement that both minimum maturity date and first contractual opportunity to redeem must be met for Tier 1 and Tier 2 basic own funds classification.
Correction to reconciliation reserve calculation to avoid canceling eligible own funds increases from classification...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation by 24 April 2026 via email to CP4_26@bankofengland
Assess current own funds instruments against proposed clarifications (e
Evaluate reconciliation reserve calculations for potential adjustments post-permission grants
Engage PRA on concurrent transactions (e
Prepare for Rulebook updates by mapping impacts to Own Funds, Reporting, Group Supervision, Glossary, and SCR Standard Formula parts
Key Dates
24 April 2026- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
2026 H2- Publication of dedicated policy statement (PS) with effective date for remaining changes.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Proposals are refinements and clarifications rather than new burdens, with modest impacts focused on error corrections and alignment with practices; however, they affect core own funds calculations critical for solvency, requiring review before H2 2026 implementation to avoid misclassifications or PRA engagement delays.
ESMA reminds firms of their obligations under CFD product intervention measures amid rising offerings of perpetual futures 24 February 2026 Investor protection The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has issued a statement reminding firms of their obligation to assess whether newly offered products fall within the scope of existing product intervention measures on contracts for differences (CFDs). The statement responds to the...
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Enforcement today announced significant updates to its Enforcement Manual. These updates underscore the Commission’s ongoing commitment to fairness, transparency, and efficiency in the investigations…
AI Analysis
The SEC's Division of Enforcement announced updates to its Enforcement Manual on February 24, 2026, focusing on enhancing fairness, transparency, and efficiency in investigations through standardized procedures like the Wells process and settlement considerations. These changes, the first major revisions since 2017, introduce uniform timelines and best practices to streamline resolutions and improve dialogue with investigated parties. Compliance professionals should prioritize this as it directly affects how firms respond to SEC inquiries, potentially accelerating outcomes and reducing uncertainties in enforcement actions.
What Changed
The updates target investigative and enforcement procedures for greater consistency:
Uniform Wells process: Recipients of a Wells notice receive four weeks to submit responses; Wells meetings are scheduled within four weeks of submission and include senior Division leadership. Guidance is provided on effective submissions to foster dialogue and timely resolutions.
Simultaneous settlement and waiver consideration: Restores practice allowing settling parties to request Commission waivers from collateral consequences (e.g., disqualifications) alongside settlement offers, improving transparency...
What You Need To Do
Review the updated Enforcement Manual (https
Update internal policies for responding to Wells notices: Prepare submissions within four weeks, focusing on elements staff find "most helpful" (e
For settlements, incorporate simultaneous waiver requests in offers to leverage restored process and mitigate collateral impacts
Enhance cooperation strategies per new evaluation framework to potentially reduce civil penalties; document internal collaboration for enforcement interactions
Monitor annual Manual reviews via SEC Division of Enforcement page (https://www
Key Dates
February 24, 2026- Updates to Enforcement Manual announced and effective; last major revision was 2017, with annual reviews planned going forward.
Four weeks from Wells notice receipt- Standard deadline for Wells submissions.DEADLINE
Four weeks from Wells submission receipt- Scheduling of Wells meetings with senior leadership.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - These procedural updates are immediately effective and alter critical interaction points with SEC staff, such as Wells responses and settlements, which can determine investigation closure, enforcement recommendations, or penalty severity. Firms under active scrutiny or anticipating inquiries gain from predictable timelines reducing prolonged uncertainty, but must adapt quickly to avoid suboptimal outcomes; non-compliance risks inefficient resolutions or missed cooperation credits.
The Central Bank of Ireland has today (24 February) published its first quarterly Access to Cash report . The Finance (Provision of Access to Cash Infrastructure) Act 2025 has put in place a framework to ensure sufficient and effective access to cash across the State. Today’s report uses newly collected data to show the number, location and opening hours of ATMs and cash service points across eight geographical regions in Ireland, as of 31 December 2025. The Minister for Finance set the acces...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website trade.amlin-limited(.)info. According to information available to BaFin, financial or investment services and crypto asset services are being offered on this platform without the required authorisation. According to the current state of knowledge, there is no connection to MS Amlin Investment Management Ltd., based in London, UK. This is likely to be a case of identity fraud.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website personalcontrol-room(.)com and against fake investment contracts sent by alleged financial experts from Clearstream Holding AG. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators are providing financial or investment services and crypto asset services without the required authorisation. The offers do not originate from Clearstream Holding AG or any other legal entities of Clearstream. This is...
We've launched our new Regulatory Priorities reports, starting with the insurance sector. This marks a new approach that will help to transform our supervision and streamline regulation.We expect regulated firms to follow the rules and stay informed about any changes. This is important for maintaining a safe and resilient market. Our mission to be a smarter regulator means reducing burden where we can, so that firms can get the information they need as efficiently as possible.Our Regulatory P...
We have signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Independent Football Regulator (IFR). The MoU establishes how the 2 organisations will work together and support effective regulation where football and financial services intersect.It also sets out a high-level framework for principles for cooperation between the IFR and the FCA.Read the MoU (PDF)
AI Analysis
The FCA has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the newly established Independent Football Regulator (IFR) to define cooperation on regulating intersections between football clubs and financial services, such as ownership suitability, licensing, and financial sustainability. This matters for compliance professionals as it formalizes information sharing and joint oversight, potentially impacting firms involved in football-related financing, investments, or consumer credit products tied to sports. It supports the Football Governance Act 2025 framework, enhancing regulatory alignment where financial misconduct could affect club operations.[https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/mou-independent-football-regulator-fca]
What Changed
Establishes a high-level framework of principles for cooperation between FCA and IFR, focusing on effective regulation at the football-financial services nexus.
Outlines how the organizations will work together, including information sharing on matters like club owners' financial dealings, licensing compliance, and enforcement where financial services intersect with IFR's duties (e.g., suitability tests for owners/officers, financial resources thresholds).[https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/mou-independent-football-regulator-fca]
Builds on prior MoUs (e.g., FCA-UKGC models) by addressing...
2025 - Football Governance Act 2025 enactmentEstablishes IFR statutory powers, including provisional/full club licensing from this date onward.
Ongoing - IFR licensing rolloutClubs transition from provisional to full licenses once threshold conditions (e.g., financial resources, owner suitability) met; no fixed end-date.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This MoU does not impose new binding rules or deadlines but signals heightened cross-regulator focus on football finances post-Football Governance Act 2025, risking enforcement overlaps or info requests. It matters for firms with niche exposures (e.g., sports financing) to avoid gaps in owner due diligence or financial promotions, potentially amplifying AML/conduct risks amid IFR's divestment powers.
ESMA simplifies MiFID II/ MiFIR obligations on market data 23 February 2026 Guidelines and Technical standards Market data Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has withdrawn its guidelines on the MiFID II/ MiFIR obligations on market data , effective immediately, reflecting its ongoing commitment to simplifying rules and reducing unnecessary compliance burdens for market participants. The decision aligns the framewo...
AI Analysis
ESMA has immediately withdrawn its guidelines on MiFID II/MiFIR market data obligations to align with the new Regulatory Technical Standards on making market data available on a reasonable commercial basis (RTS on RCB), reducing compliance burdens for market participants. This simplifies the regulatory framework by eliminating overlapping soft-law guidance, focusing firms on binding RTS requirements for data transparency, non-discrimination, and cost-based pricing. It matters as it streamlines operations amid broader MiFID II/MiFIR reviews, lowering costs while maintaining market integrity.
What Changed
Withdrawal of ESMA's previous guidelines on MiFID II/MiFIR market data obligations, effective immediately on 23 February 2026, to avoid overlap with binding rules.
Full alignment with RTS on RCB, which sets criteria for transparency, non-discrimination, and reasonable commercial basis pricing of market data by trading venues and approved publication arrangements.
Firms must now rely solely on RTS legal text for interpreting data provision, disclosure, and fee structures, without legacy interpretive guidance.
What You Need To Do
Review and map internal policies, procedures, and data disclosure practices directly to RTS on RCB criteria for transparency, non-discrimination, and cost-based pricing
Document compliance with RTS across asset classes and distribution channels; cease reliance on withdrawn guidelines
Contact ESMA at RCB@esma
Key Dates
23 November 2025- RTS on RCB enters into force.
23 February 2026- Withdrawal of legacy ESMA guidelines takes effect immediately.
22 August 2026- End of transition period for pre-authorised market data providers to align contracts with RTS on RCB.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate guideline withdrawal requires prompt policy updates to avoid supervisory misalignment, though the 22 August 2026 transition eases contract changes for legacy providers. This matters as it reduces ambiguity and burdens in a simplifying regulatory environment, but non-compliance risks enforcement under binding RTS amid MiFID II/MiFIR reviews; proactive alignment prevents future disruptions.
ESMA consults on guarantees as CCP collateral and on certain aspects of CCP investment policy 23 February 2026 CCP The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has launched a public consultation following the review of the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR 3). ESMA is encouraging all interested stakeholders, including non-financial counterparties (NFCs), to share their views about: the relevant conditions under which ...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched a public consultation under EMIR 3 to gather stakeholder input on conditions for CCPs accepting public guarantees, public bank guarantees, and commercial bank guarantees as collateral, eligibility of debt instruments for CCP investment policies, and secured arrangements for emission allowances as margins or default fund contributions. This matters because it permanently broadens eligible collateral types and extends access to NFC clients, enhancing EU CCP efficiency, competitiveness, and accessibility amid liquidity pressures in energy and other markets.
What Changed
Permanent expansion of eligible CCP collateral to include public guarantees, public bank guarantees, and commercial bank guarantees, with specified conditions for acceptance.
Criteria for deeming debt instruments as eligible financial instruments under CCP investment policies.
Requirements for highly secured arrangements to deposit emission allowances as margins or default fund contributions.
These build on EMIR 3's measures to broaden collateral scope and entity coverage, including NFC clients, addressing prior temporary measures that lapsed or faced expiry challenges.
What You Need To Do
Review and Respond to Consultation
Assess Internal Policies
Monitor Developments
Engage with Industry
Key Dates
30 April 2026- Consultation response deadline; submit online via ESMA portal, addressing specific questions with rationale.DEADLINE
End of 2026- ESMA to submit final draft technical standards to the European Commission following final report preparation.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Firms face a tight 2-month window (from 23 February 2026) to influence final RTS, with implementation likely in 2027+ affecting core clearing operations; delays risk non-compliance with broadened collateral rules amid ongoing liquidity strains, especially for NFCs in volatile markets like energy.
The German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) has issued a warning regarding offers available at the website krf-mbh(.)com, purportedly operated by Gesellschaft für Kryptoregisterführung GmbH based in Willich. However, these offerings do not originate from Gesellschaft für Kryptoregisterführung GmbH nor any of their staff members; it's a clear instance of identity fraud. Unauthorized individuals are providing unauthorized financial and cryptocurrency-related services through this...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the websites weisbergadvisors(.)inc and weisbergadvisors(.)ai. According to information available to BaFin, these websites are being used to offer financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
This January 2026 report contains an update of the latest consumer price developments in Singapore, prepared by MAS and the Ministry of Trade and Industry.
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues. To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
Seven social media influencers have been sentenced at Southwark Crown Court for their role in the promotion of an unauthorised foreign exchange trading scheme. Biggs Chris, Jamie Clayton, Lauren Goodger, Rebecca Gormley, Yazmin Oukhellou, Scott Timlin and Eva Zapico all pleaded guilty to one count of issuing unauthorised financial promotions.The outcomes were:Lauren Goodger was fined £3,750 and ordered to pay costs of £5,778.18.Biggs Chris was fined £600 and ordered to pay costs of £1,000.Jam...
PRA Policy Statement PS5/26 finalizes rules permitting UK credit unions to invest in Credit Union Service Organisations (CUSOs), expanding from the CP13/25 proposals to foster innovation, collaboration, and growth while managing prudential risks through safeguards like due diligence and investment caps. This matters as it enables credit unions—often smaller mutuals—to access shared services (e.g., HR, IT, compliance) via CUSOs, leveling the playing field against larger competitors and supporting the PRA's safety/soundness and competitiveness objectives.
What Changed
Investment permission and cap increase: Credit unions can now invest in CUSOs using own capital, with the cap raised from 5% to 7.5% of total capital across all CUSOs (clarifications added on practical application, e.g., aggregation).
Expanded CUSO scope: CUSOs can now serve other UK-regulated mutuals (with Part 4A permission) beyond just credit unions; partnerships with non-credit unions permitted as owners, subject to safeguards.
Supervisory expectations in SS2/23: New chapter requires due diligence, risk analysis, limited liability to investment amount, legal/operational separation,...
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Ensure structural safeguards
Governance alignment
Implementation planning
Reporting/oversight
Key Dates
24 October 2025- Consultation response deadline for CP13/25.DEADLINE
20 February 2026- Publication date of PS5/26 (final policy).
~20 August 2026- Implementation deadline for SS2/23 CUSO expectations (six months from PS5/26 publication).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Credit unions eyeing CUSOs for growth (e.g., shared services) must act promptly within the six-month window to avoid supervisory breaches, as this expands opportunities but introduces new prudential risks (e.g., ownership misalignment, capital exposure). Non-compliance risks heightened PRA scrutiny, especially post-PS26/25 mutual sector review; benefits justify costs only for opt-in firms, but proactive preparation ensures safety/soundness.
ESMA publishes a supervisory briefing on the AAR representativeness obligation 20 February 2026 CCP The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published a supervisory briefing on the representativeness obligation linked to the active account requirement (AAR). The briefing sets out ESMA’s supervisory expectations for how counterparties should comply with and report on the AAR representativeness obligation. It provides guidanc...
AI Analysis
ESMA has published supervisory guidance clarifying how counterparties must comply with the **representativeness obligation** under the Active Account Requirement (AAR), a key component of EMIR 3 that mandates EU counterparties maintain active accounts at EU central counterparties (CCPs) and clear representative volumes of derivatives trades. This briefing is critical because market participants and regulators have held conflicting interpretations of the representativeness requirement, creating compliance uncertainty that this guidance now resolves.
What Changed
The supervisory briefing addresses three core compliance areas:
*Identifying Most Relevant Subcategories**: Counterparties must continuously identify the five most relevant subcategories for each class of derivatives over each reference period, based on their trading activity. The guidance clarifies that the number of subcategories to select equals the maximum number available for that derivative class.
*Representativeness Compliance Standard: Counterparties must clear, on an annual average basis**, at least five trades in each of the most relevant subcategories per class of derivative...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (by 26 February 2026)
Review the ESMA supervisory briefing and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/305 in detail
Assess whether your firm meets the €6 billion notional clearing volume outstanding threshold triggering AAR obligations
Identify internal teams responsible for AAR compliance (trading, operations, compliance, reporting)
*Short-term (by 31 July 2026)
Key Dates
26 February 2026- AAR RTS enter into force (20 days after Official Journal publication on 6 February 2026)
31 July 2026- First EMIR 3 representativeness reporting deadlineDEADLINE
31 January 2027- First AAR compliance report dueDEADLINE
The financial supervisory authority BaFin is warning about a dubious job advertisement on the website vios-beratung(.)de which allegedly operates from the VIOS Consulting GmbH, Bielefeld. However, the offers on this site do not come from the VIOS Consulting GmbH or its employees. This is identity fraud. Unknown operators are advertising private individuals with seemingly lucrative job opportunities that involve opening accounts for testing purposes and transferring money or cryptocurrencies a...
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns against the WhatsApp groups „Tethys Investment Alliance 771“ and „Tethys Investment Alliance-S62“, the websites „tethys-alliance.de“ and „tethys-uberblick.com“ as well as the apps „QVTCoinese“ und „QVTCoinese Pro“, which are allegedly operated by the Baku/Boston/Dubai-based company Tethys Investment Management LLC. In the WhatsApp groups consumers are enticed to trade financial products via the respective apps. It is suspected that the ...
ESMA sanctions Regis-TR for serious breaches of organisational obligations 19 February 2026 Press Releases Securities Financing Transactions Supervision Trade Repositories The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the European Union’s (EU) financial markets regulator and supervisor, has fined the trade repository (TR) REGIS-TR, S.A. a total of EUR 1,374,000 for seven infringements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and the Securities Financing Transactions ...
AI Analysis
ESMA has fined REGIS-TR, S.A. €1,374,000 for seven negligent breaches of organisational obligations under EMIR and SFTR, marking the first SFTR enforcement action and ESMA's highest fine against a trade repository. The breaches involved deficiencies in policies, procedures, organisational structure, operational risk management, and data confidentiality, compromising SFTR reporting and market data integrity. This underscores ESMA's intensified enforcement on trade repositories (TRs) to ensure high-quality data for market surveillance and financial stability.
What Changed
This is an enforcement decision, not new legislation, but it reinforces existing EMIR and SFTR requirements on TRs, particularly:
Policies and procedures: Must be adequate to ensure compliance, with clear roles and responsibilities for governing bodies (breaches under EMIR Art. 78(3) and SFTR Art. 9(1), Point (c) Section I Annex I EMIR).
Organisational structure: Must ensure business continuity and orderly functioning, especially for SFTR services (breach under SFTR).
Operational risk management: Identify and minimise risks via systems, controls, and procedures (breaches under EMIR and SFTR,...
What You Need To Do
For REGIS-TR specifically
For all TRs
Audit organisational structure for SFTR business continuity and orderly functioning
Conduct operational risk assessments, implementing controls/systems to minimise risks under EMIR/SFTR
Enhance data confidentiality/integrity protections and misuse prevention measures
Key Dates
14 November 2013- REGIS-TR initial registration with ESMA under EMIR.
7 May 2020- REGIS-TR registration extended to SFTR reporting.
14 June 2024- ESMA Supervisory Report identifying serious indications of breaches.
17 June 2024- Public notice references investigations leading to findings (dated in decision docs).
17 February 2026- ESMA Board of Supervisors meeting discussing the case.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – As the first SFTR enforcement and record TR fine (€1.374M), it demonstrates ESMA's commitment to punitive action on negligence causing systemic data risks, directly threatening market integrity and surveillance. TRs face immediate remediation pressure (three breaches ongoing), with fines amplified by duration/systemic factors; non-TRs using TRs risk indirect exposure via poor data quality. Firms should prioritise audits now to avoid similar "negligent" findings.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the websites boamglobal.com and boamglobal-mf.com and against WhatsApp groups lead by “Dr Feldmann” and his assistant “Lina Weiss”. According to information available to BaFin, the operator BlueOcean Asset Management Ltd. is providing financial and investment services without the required authorisation.
The ECB imposed €12.18 million in penalties on J.P. Morgan SE on 19 February 2026 for misreporting risk-weighted assets (RWAs) from 2019-2024 due to misclassification of corporate exposures (15 quarters) and improper exclusion of transactions in credit valuation adjustment (CVA) risk calculations (21 quarters), both attributed to serious negligence and internal control failures. This enforcement action underscores the ECB's focus on accurate prudential reporting, as underreported RWAs led to overstated capital ratios, distorting supervisory oversight of the bank's risk profile and capital adequacy. Compliance teams must prioritize RWA calculation integrity to avoid similar "severe" and "moderately severe" sanctions under the ECB's penalty guide.
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new rule change, but it reinforces existing requirements under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) for accurate RWA calculations, including proper classification of corporate exposures for credit risk and inclusion of all relevant transactions in CVA risk (which measures counterparty default risk in derivatives). The ECB applied its Guide to the method of setting administrative pecuniary penalties, categorizing breaches as "severe" (credit risk) and "moderately severe" (CVA risk), based on duration, negligence, and impact on supervisory transparency.
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate RWA process reviews
Strengthen internal controls
Enhance reporting accuracy
Monitor ECB sanctions page (https
J.P. Morgan specifically
Key Dates
2019-2024- Period of breaches: 15 quarters of corporate exposure misclassification and 21 quarters of CVA transaction exclusions.
19 February 2026- ECB publishes decision imposing €12.18 million penalties on J.P. Morgan SE.
Within time limits under Article 263 TFEU- Deadline for J.P. Morgan to challenge the decision before the Court of Justice of the European Union (typically 2 months from notification).DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This recent (published yesterday) ECB action against a major global bank signals intensified enforcement on RWA reporting, with penalties scaling by breach severity and duration; firms with derivatives or corporate lending books face elevated remediation pressure to prevent distorted capital views and fines up to "extremely severe" levels. It matters because RWAs directly underpin capital requirements, and control failures erode supervisory trust, potentially triggering broader SSM investigations.
MAR Executive & other private individuals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The Casino case: the Paris Tribunal Correctionnel ruling marks the end of a market abuse case in which the AMF has been heavily involved
Our clarification about forbearance following the introduction of the new Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations (POATRs) regime. On 19 January 2026, the Public Offers and Admissions to Trading Regulations (POATRs) regime and associated changes to our listing processes in the UK Listing Rules (UKLR) came into force. These changes introduced a requirement in the Prospectus Regime Manual (PRM 1.6.4R) for issuers to notify a Regulatory Information Service (RIS) of any admission to t...
AI Analysis
The FCA's statement clarifies forbearance on overlapping notification requirements for admissions to trading under the new POATRs regime effective 19 January 2026, addressing confusion from removed block listing exemptions in UKLR. It matters because it provides temporary relief from duplicative RIS notifications for frequent issuers, preventing unintended supervisory burdens while the FCA consults on rule amendments.
What Changed
POATRs and UKLR Updates: Effective 19 January 2026, PRM 1.6.4R requires issuers to notify a Regulatory Information Service (RIS) of any admission to trading within 60 days, allowing grouping of multiple admissions for proportionality.
Overlapping UKLR Rules: Provisions in UKLR 6.4.4R(4), 13.3.20R(4), 14.3.17R(4), 16.3.16R(4), and 22.2.17R(4) require "as soon as possible" RIS notifications for new equity issues or public offers, conflicting with the 60-day rule post-block listing deletion (former UKLR 20.6).
Forbearance Policy: FCA will not take enforcement action for non-compliance with the...
What You Need To Do
Review ongoing/future issuances against former block listing criteria: confirm securities unissued pre-19 January 2026 and same purpose to rely on forbearance
Implement PRM 1.6.4R
Monitor FCA announcements for consultation launch and updates; prepare responses if issuing frequently
Document reliance on forbearance (e
No immediate "as soon as possible" notifications needed under forbearance for qualifying cases
Key Dates
19 January 2026- POATRs regime and UKLR changes effective, including PRM 1.6.4R (60-day RIS notification) and deletion of UKLR 20.6 block listings.
19 January 2026- Cut-off for securities under former block listings to qualify for forbearance (must not have been issued/offered prior).DEADLINE
Shortly after February 2026- FCA consultation on removing UKLR 6.4.4R(4) and equivalents (no exact date specified).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Forbearance reduces immediate risk of enforcement for qualifying issuers, but ongoing POATRs compliance (60-day notifications) is mandatory. Matters for operational efficiency, as misalignment could lead to duplicative reporting costs; non-qualifying issuances risk breaches until consultation resolves.
ESMA seeks input to streamline and simplify its market abuse guidelines 19 February 2026 Market Abuse Market Integrity The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has launched a consultation proposing amendments to its Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) guidelines on the delay in the disclosure of inside information. The proposals align the guidelines with the disclosure regime as amended by the Listing Act, ensuring issuers face fewer...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched a consultation on amending its Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) guidelines on delaying disclosure of inside information, aligning them with changes introduced by the Listing Act to reduce issuer burdens and clarify requirements. This matters because it simplifies compliance for issuers by removing outdated delay justifications and adding new ones, effective from June 2026, potentially lowering administrative costs while maintaining market integrity.
What Changed
Alignment with Listing Act: Guidelines will reflect MAR amendments, removing the requirement for immediate disclosure of inside information on protracted processes before completion (effective June 2026), and deleting related legitimate interests for delay from current guidelines.
New legitimate interests for delay: Adds scenarios such as public authority requests for non-disclosure, issuer need for more time to collect information, or involvement in multiple similar procurement processes.
Elimination of "no misleading the public" condition: Removes Guideline 2 entirely, as the Listing Act...
What You Need To Do
Respond to consultation
Review and update policies
Train staff
Monitor updates
Key Dates
19 February 2026 - Consultation launch date.
29 April 2026 - Consultation response deadline(10-week period).
5 June 2026 - Entry into application of amended MAR disclosure regime(issuers no longer required to immediately disclose protracted process inside information).DEADLINE
Q4 2026 - ESMA final report and updated guidelines publication.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This is a consultation on simplifications that reduce burdens rather than impose new obligations, with changes not effective until June 2026—giving firms over four months post-consultation to adapt. It matters for issuers to engage now for influence and early policy alignment, avoiding future misalignment penalties under MAR, but lacks immediate enforcement risk.
ESMA publishes list of supplementary deferrals for sovereign bonds 19 February 2026 Post Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), together with National Competent Authorities (NCAs), has agreed supplementary deferrals that may be applied on top of the standard Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) deferral regime for sovereign bonds. ESMA and all NCAs, except the National Bank of Slovakia (NBS), have decided to allow the following supplementary deferrals: fo...
AI Analysis
ESMA has authorized **supplementary deferrals for sovereign bond post-trade transparency**, allowing market participants to omit transaction volumes from immediate publication for medium-sized trades on liquid bonds, with full disclosure required by end-of-day. This measure balances market transparency with liquidity protection in EU sovereign bond markets, effective May 4, 2026, with a compressed implementation timeline requiring immediate compliance planning.
What Changed
*Scope of Supplementary Deferrals
The decision permits volume omission deferrals** for sovereign bonds classified as Group 1, Category 1 instruments (medium-size, liquid instruments) under MiFIR's post-trade transparency framework. Market operators and investment firms may defer publication of transaction volumes until end-of-trading-day, rather than the standard 15-minute deferral period.
*Regulatory Rationale**
ESMA determined that these deferrals are necessary to account for specific characteristics of sovereign bond markets, particularly protecting market liquidity and ensuring orderly...
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Preparation (by May 4, 2026)
*System Configuration
*Instrument Classification
*APA Coordination
*Policy Documentation
Key Dates
February 17, 2026- ESMA Board of Supervisors adopts decision
February 19, 2026- ESMA publishes supplementary deferrals list
March 2, 2026- Original implementation date (subsequently extended)
May 4, 2026- **Effective date for supplementary deferrals application**
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Dukas-Global and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website dukas-global(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website referral.mnlo(.)app. BaFin has information that Next Level Church Global Hub, Inc., New Orleans, USA, is using this website to offer banking business and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website blue-invest(.)org. BaFin has information that the operators are offering banking business and/or financial services on this website without the required authorisation. The operators are not supervised by BaFin.
Warning Savings protection Retail investors Professional investors Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF has required the suspension of RAPID NUTRITION shares and calls on investors to be vigilant
AI Analysis
The AMF has mandated the suspension of trading in RAPID NUTRITION shares (Euronext Growth Paris: ALRPD) from February 19, 2026, until March 13, 2026, due to indicators of "pump and dump" market manipulation, urging investors to exercise extreme caution against unauthorized high-upside recommendations. This enforcement action highlights AMF's proactive surveillance of market abuse in small-cap listings and serves as a reminder for firms to enhance client protection measures against boiler room tactics. It matters for compliance as it underscores heightened scrutiny on retail investor-facing activities amid volatile stock surges, like RAPID NUTRITION's 437% rise since January 1, 2026.[AMF publication]
What Changed
This is not a new regulation but an enforcement action under existing French financial markets and market abuse rules (e.g., EU Market Abuse Regulation - MAR, transposed via AMF oversight). Key elements include:
Trading suspension on Euronext at AMF's request due to suspected "pump and dump" (boiler room) practices, involving unauthorized recommendations promising rapid gains without disclosing promoters' holdings or sales.
No formal rule changes; reinforces prohibitions on market manipulation (Article 12 MAR), unlawful investment recommendations (MiFID II Article 24), and failure to disclose...
What You Need To Do
Trading venues (Euronext)
Firms/brokers
Enhance surveillance for pump-and-dump indicators (e
Review client communications for unauthorized advice; block/blocklist suspicious patterns
Train staff on recognizing boiler room tactics and MAR breaches
Key Dates
19 February 2026 - Trading suspension begins(effective from this trading session).
13 March 2026 - Scheduled end of suspension(inclusive, or earlier if market conditions allow via new AMF notice).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate trading halt requires system updates today (Feb 19, 2026); ongoing AMF probe risks fines/sanctions under MAR for non-compliant surveillance or advice. Matters due to retail investor exposure in volatile Euronext Growth stocks, potential for follow-on enforcement (e.g., against unauthorized advisors), and signal of intensified AMF monitoring amid 437% surges, amplifying conduct risk for client-facing firms.[AMF publication]
The PRA's CP3/26 proposes rule amendments to align its Rulebook with HM Treasury's (HMT) Overseas Prudential Requirements Regime (OPRR), which restates and modifies existing CRR equivalence provisions for treating overseas entities' exposures as preferential "exposures to institutions." This matters for **PRA-authorised firms** as it clarifies capital treatment for cross-border exposures, reduces interpretive burdens, and ensures consistency post-Brexit, advancing the PRA's safety and soundness objective while facilitating HMT designations.
What Changed
Credit Risk Standardised Approach (SA): Exposures to overseas credit institutions, investment firms, or exchanges treated as "exposures to institutions" only if from UK or HMT-designated OPRR jurisdictions; deletes CRR Article 119(5) for investment firms under Part 9C rules.
IRB Approach: Preserves CRR Article 107(3) effect by aligning exposure class allocation with SA's updated "exposures to institutions" concept.
Large Exposures: Amends Rule 1.3 definition of "institution" to limit preferential treatment to UK or OPRR-designated overseas entities.
General Scope: Applies changes across PRA...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond to consultation by 2 April 2026, indicating consent for name/organisation publication and any confidentiality claims
Assess current exposures to overseas institutions/exchanges against proposed OPRR criteria; model impacts on capital requirements under SA, IRB, and large exposures rules
Update internal policies on exposure classification once final rules published; monitor HMT OPRR designations for affected jurisdictions
Indicate response as individual or organisational; personal data handled per Bank of England privacy notice
Key Dates
Thursday 2 April 2026- Consultation response deadline; submit to CP3_26@bankofengland.co.uk or PRA at 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Firms must engage promptly on consultation (deadline ~10 weeks from publication) to influence outcomes; changes clarify but could increase capital for non-designated overseas exposures, impacting safety/soundness and competitiveness. Failure to adapt risks non-compliance with updated Rulebook and higher prudential burdens.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat den Anhang 2 der Verordnung vom 25. Mai 2005 über Massnahmen gegenüber Sudan (SR 946.231.18) geändert.
AI Analysis
The Swiss Federal Department for Economic Affairs, Education and Research (WBF) has amended Annex 2 of the Ordinance of 25 May 2005 on Measures against Sudan (SR 946.231.18), updating Switzerland's sanctions list in alignment with UN and international developments. This matters for Swiss financial institutions as it imposes immediate asset freeze and reporting obligations on newly designated individuals and entities linked to threats against Sudan's peace and security, including RSF support and mercenary activities. Compliance teams must screen and act swiftly to avoid FINMA enforcement under supervisory law.
What Changed
Amendment to Annex 2 of SR 946.231.18 by WBF, adding seven individuals to the Sudan sanctions list, mirroring recent UN-aligned updates (e.g., UK additions on 5 February 2026 for persons like Alvaro Andres Quijano Becerra and Abu Aqla Mohamed Kaikal involved in RSF support, mercenary enlistment, and financial services to armed groups).
Sanctions include asset freezes, prohibitions on dealings with designated persons' funds or economic resources, and mandatory reporting to authorities, consistent with Switzerland's implementation of UNSC Resolution 1591 via the Embargo Act.
Updates reflect...
What You Need To Do
Immediate screening
No dealings
Controls update
Licensing check
Key Dates
5 February 2026- UK adds six individuals to Sudan sanctions list (e.g., SUD0026 to SUD0031), informing Swiss alignment.
18 February 2026- Switzerland publicly notes addition of seven individuals to Sudan list via ACAMS report.
19 February 2026- WBF amends Annex 2 of SR 946.231.18, effective immediately for compliance (publication date).DEADLINE
12 March 2026- UN Panel of Experts interim report due on Sudan sanctions implementation.DEADLINE
Urgency: High - Immediate asset freeze obligations apply from publication (19 February 2026), with FINMA's enforcement powers (coercive measures under administrative law) risking fines, reputational damage, or license revocation for non-compliance. This escalates amid ongoing Sudan conflict, UN extensions, and multi-jurisdictional alignment, heightening cross-border transaction risks.
Das Eidgenössische Departement für Wirtschaft, Bildung und Forschung (WBF) hat den Anhang der Verordnung vom 10. April 2024 über Massnahmen gegenüber Personen und Organisationen, welche die Hamas oder den Palästinensischen Islamischen Dschihad unterstützen (SR 946.231.09), geändert.
Upcoming changes to the Euribor Panel 18 February 2026 Benchmarks The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is issuing a statement on the upcoming changes to the Euribor panel, in its capacity as supervisor of the European Money Market Institute (EMMI), administrator of Euribor. This statement concerns the announcement by EMMI that Barclays Bank PLC (BBPLC), based in the United Kingdom, will withdraw from the Euribor panel. The ...
Gabriel Makhlouf, Governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, today delivered a keynote address at the Blavatnik School of Government, outlining the critical role of central bank independence in delivering price stability and supporting economic prosperity for society. Speaking on “Institutions, Anchors, and Their Discontents: The Role of Central Banks”, Governor Makhlouf highlighted how central bank independence, underpinned by clear mandates and robust accountability frameworks, enables moneta...
It is a pleasure to be here in Oxford 1 While I’m aware that this is a school of government and I’m a central banker, the two are inextricably linked. Societies and indeed economies are shaped by their institutions, specifically the legal, social, cultural, formal and informal norms that impact the way citizens interact with each other. Successful institutions are those that are trusted by the societies that created them and for which they ultimately serve. Today I am going to resist the oppo...
AI Analysis
Governor Gabriel Makhlouf's speech at the Blavatnik School of Government addresses central bank independence as a foundational institutional mechanism for delivering price stability and economic prosperity, rather than as a shield from accountability. The speech is not a regulatory enforcement action or new requirement, but rather a governance statement clarifying the Central Bank of Ireland's institutional philosophy on independence, credibility, and accountability—matters that directly affect how the CBI exercises supervisory discretion over regulated firms.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change document but a governance clarification with compliance implications:
Reframing of independence: Central bank independence is characterized as an "anchor" enabling long-term decision-making rather than isolation from society.
Credibility framework: Credibility depends on competence, engagement, coherence, and public trust—not institutional distance alone.
Accountability emphasis: Independence requires continuous dialogue with society and other economic governance institutions; it "does not mean isolation."
Historical validation: The speech references the...
What You Need To Do
*Understand CBI decision-making philosophy
*Engage constructively with supervisors
*Align governance with credibility principles
*Monitor 2026 supervisory priorities
Key Dates
10 February 2026- CBI published its 2026 Regulatory and Supervisory Priorities, which establish the operational framework within which this governance philosophy applies
18 February 2026- This speech delivered, reinforcing institutional independence principles
Second half 2026- Ireland assumes EU Council Presidency; CBI will support government during this period
Exigences applicables au réviseur d’entreprises agréé spécial auprès des établissements de crédit émetteurs de lettres de gage
AI Analysis
Circular CSSF 26/907, published on February 18, 2026, establishes requirements for **approved special statutory auditors (réviseurs d'entreprises agréés spéciaux) serving credit institutions that issue mortgage bonds (lettres de gage)**. This circular formalizes the governance and audit standards applicable to a specialized auditor role within Luxembourg's credit institution framework, ensuring enhanced oversight of entities engaged in mortgage bond issuance.
What Changed
The search results provided do not contain the full text of Circular CSSF 26/907, as it is available only in French and the PDF content was not included in the available materials. However, based on the title and regulatory context, this circular addresses:
Statutory auditor qualifications and requirements for the specialized role of approving auditors (réviseurs agréés spéciaux) overseeing credit institutions that issue mortgage bonds
Governance standards for auditors in this specialized capacity
Audit and oversight responsibilities specific to mortgage bond issuance activities
The...
What You Need To Do
*Obtain and review the full French text of Circular CSSF 26/907 from the CSSF website
*Assess current auditor qualifications against the new requirements for approved special statutory auditors
*Update audit engagement letters and terms to reflect any new standards or responsibilities
*Document compliance with the circular's requirements in governance and audit files
*Communicate with appointed auditors to ensure alignment with the new framework
Key Dates
18 February 2026- Circular CSSF 26/907 published
No specific implementation deadline providedin available search results; firms should consult the full French text for any transition periods or effective dates
ESMA supports the simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards and suggests targeted adjustments 18 February 2026 Issuer disclosure Press Releases Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority, the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has delivered its opinion on the draft revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) developed by EFRAG. ESMA strongly supports the European Commission’s goal of enhancing competitiveness and growth through ...
AI Analysis
ESMA has issued an opinion supporting EFRAG's draft simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, praising improvements in readability and materiality focus while recommending targeted adjustments to enhance investor protection and financial stability. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming refinements to sustainability disclosures, with pragmatic supervision promised during the transition, potentially reducing short-term burdens but requiring monitoring of final delegated act adoption by summer 2026.
What Changed
The draft revised ESRS introduce simplifications such as improved readability, language, format, reduced volume of requirements, and a focus on material matters. ESMA recommends specific adjustments before finalization:
Introduce time limits to certain permanent reliefs (e.g., reliefs #3, #4, #9, #11 on quantitative information for anticipated financial effects until FY 2029, and metrics).
Refine requirements on transition plans (e.g., consistent disclosure of absolute financed emissions and contextual information).
Strengthen reporting on sustainability competences of administrative,...
What You Need To Do
Monitor Commission process
Assess current reporting
Enhance governance disclosures
Review subsidiary exemptions
Prepare for supervision
Key Dates
Summer 2026- European Commission aims to adopt revised ESRS into a delegated act, considering ESMA, EBA, EIOPA, ECB opinions.
FY 2029 (reporting in 2030)- End of certain temporary reliefs on quantitative information for anticipated financial effects (if ESMA recommendations adopted).
First years post-adoption (2026+)- Learning curve period with pragmatic NCAs supervision and flexibility in examinations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not yet finalized (pending summer 2026 adoption), with pragmatic supervision promised, reducing immediate pressure; however, matters due to potential tightening of reliefs and disclosures impacting FY2026+ reporting, investor protection focus, and interoperability needs. Firms should prioritize if heavily using reliefs or with complex transition plans, as non-adjustment risks supervisory scrutiny post-learning curve.
ESMA publishes statement supporting the smooth implementation of the Listing Act – simplifying prospectus compliance for issuers 18 February 2026 Prospectus The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has issued a statement with practical guidance to national competent authorities (NCAs), issuers, and their advisors on the application of the revised prospectus framework introduced by the Listing Act. ESMA clarifies that any regis...
AI Analysis
ESMA has issued a public statement providing practical guidance on implementing changes to the Prospectus Regulation (PR) under the Listing Act, clarifying the transitional regime for registration documents and universal registration documents approved or filed until 4 June 2026, allowing their continued use in prospectuses. This matters because it reduces compliance burdens for issuers accessing capital markets while preserving investor protection, enabling smoother transitions amid upcoming Level 2 measures. Issuers and advisors can rely on this non-binding guidance as ESMA expects NCAs to follow it.
What Changed
Transitional regime clarification under Article 48a PR: Registration documents and universal registration documents approved or filed until 4 June 2026 fall within the Article 48a(1) transitional scope, allowing use in tripartite prospectuses approved thereafter until their validity ends (typically 12 months). These must remain updated via supplements and amendments under pre-Listing Act PR rules.
What You Need To Do
Review and file/approve registration/universal registration documents before 4 June 2026 to leverage transitional regime; ensure ongoing supplements/amendments under old PR
For EU Follow-on/Growth prospectuses pre-Delegated Act: Structure per PR Annexes IV/V/VII/VIII; voluntarily adopt recommended Delegated Act disclosures for compliance with Articles 14a/15a
Advisors/issuers
Monitor Delegated Act adoption (likely pre-5 March 2026) and ESMA Level 2 technical standards
Key Dates
Until 4 June 2026Registration/universal registration documents approved/filed fall under Article 48a transitional regime; usable thereafter until validity ends.
5 March 2026Expected non-application date of Delegated Act amending (EU) 2019/980; interim PR Annexes IV/V/VII/VIII and Articles 14a/15a apply, with recommended Delegated Act disclosures.
March 2026Listing Act provisions for secondary and growth issuance prospectuses enter application.
5 June 2026 / 10 June 2026Bulk of Listing Act provisions (including standard prospectuses) enter application; new Level 2 requirements apply from related ESMA technical advice.
H1 2026Potential NCA flexibility for early implementation of new requirements if available.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate relevance today (18 February 2026) for ongoing prospectus preparations, as it clarifies transitional use of existing documents and interim disclosures amid imminent deadlines (March/June 2026). Failure to align risks invalidation of documents or heightened scrutiny, but guidance eases burden reduction—critical for issuers timing listings to minimize costs while ensuring investor protection.
The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA's decisions to ban Stephen Joseph Burdett and James Paul Goodchild from working in financial services. Mr Burdett and Mr Goodchild previously held senior roles at Synergy Wealth Limited (Synergy) and Westbury Private Clients LLP (Westbury), respectively.The FCA banned the pair from working in regulated financial services for recklessly exposing pension holders to unsuitable investments.The Tribunal also found that it was appropriate for the FCA to impose ...
The German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns against the website omenyxgroup(.)com, which entices consumers to trade crypto assets. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown operators of the website are offering crypto asset services without the required authorisation.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers on the website pnl-holding(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, P&L Invest Holding AG is providing financial or investment services and crypto asset services without the required authorisation. According to the current state of knowledge, there is no connection to the P&L Invest Holding GmbH. This is likely to be a case of identity fraud.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against offers in WhatsApp groups, which are allegedly operated by Intermediate Capital Group (ICG). According to information available to BaFin, recommendations for the purchase of financial instruments and cryptocurrencies, which can allegedly be traded via ICG GEF app, are offered in various WhatsApp groups. The offers do not originate from ICG Europe S.à.r.l. - Frankfurt Branch or any other company belonging to Intermediate Capital G...
1) high-risk jurisdictions on which enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures are imposed2) jurisdictions under increased monitoring of the FATFVersion of 17 February 2026
AI Analysis
The Annex of Circular CSSF 22/822 (Version of 17 February 2026) is Luxembourg's Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier's implementation guidance on FATF (Financial Action Task Force) designations of high-risk jurisdictions requiring enhanced due diligence and counter-measures, as well as jurisdictions under increased monitoring. This document is critical for Luxembourg-regulated financial institutions because it operationalizes international AML/CFT standards into binding compliance obligations, directly impacting customer acceptance, transaction monitoring, and correspondent banking relationships.
What Changed
The current version (17 February 2026) represents the most recent update to the CSSF's FATF-aligned jurisdiction risk framework. Based on the available search results, the document establishes two primary regulatory categories:
*High-Risk Jurisdictions (Category 1): Jurisdictions designated by FATF as having strategic deficiencies in their AML/CFT regimes, requiring enhanced due diligence and, where appropriate, counter-measures.
What You Need To Do
*For High-Risk Jurisdictions
Apply enhanced due diligence and monitoring measures to business relationships and transactions with designated jurisdictions
Increase the frequency and timing of transaction controls
Select transaction patterns requiring further examination and obtain detailed information on transaction purposes
Maintain enhanced mechanisms for reporting suspicious activity to the FIU
Key Dates
17 February 2026- Current version effective (Annex of Circular CSSF 22/822)
27 October 2025- Previous version superseded
27 October 2022- Original Circular CSSF 22/822 issued
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority BaFin warns against fixed-term deposit offers sent from the email address info[at]lgimeu(.)com. According to information available to BaFin, the unknown providers are conducting banking transactions without the required authorisation. The offers do not originate from LGIM Managers (Europe) Limited. This is a case of identity theft.
The Board of Directors of the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA has appointed Alain Girard as the new Head of its Banks division. The current Head of the Recovery and Resolution division will take up his new role on 1 April 2026. He succeeds Thomas Hirschi, who left FINMA at the end of August 2025. Simon Brönnimann, who oversaw the Banks division on an interim basis, will now assume leadership of the Recovery and Resolution division on an interim basis.
Anti-money Laundering Asset management The AMF invites financial market participants to AMLA’s consultations on three draft AML/CFT implementing standards
AI Analysis
The AMF is urging financial market participants, especially in asset management and related sectors, to engage in AMLA's public consultations on three draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS) under the new EU AML/CFT package, covering customer due diligence (CDD), identification of business relationships/transactions, and enforcement measures. These RTS aim to provide harmonized, proportionate implementation guidance, significantly impacting CDD processes and supervisory consistency across the EU, with underlying rules applying from 10 July 2027.[Source URL: https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-invites-financial-market-participants-amlas-consultations-three-draft-amlcft-implementing#xts=607212&xtor=RSS-11&type=RSS]
What Changed
CDD RTS: Builds on EBA's prior draft with AMLA refinements for legal clarity, proportionality, and risk adaptation; specifies information/sources for identity verification of natural persons/legal entities, remote onboarding measures, business relationship purpose/nature identification, politically exposed persons (PEPs) measures, sectoral measures (e.g., for asset managers under Article 17 where units/shares are distributed via intermediaries), enhanced due diligence additions, and sanctions checks.[Source URL:...
What You Need To Do
Participate in consultations
Gap analysis and preparation
Engage hearings
Monitor post-consultation
Key Dates
9 February 2026- Consultations opened by AMLA on three draft RTS.[Source URL: https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-invites-financial-market-participants-amlas-consultations-three-draft-amlcft-implementing#xts=607212&xtor=RSS-11&type=RSS]
24 March 2026- Online public hearing on CDD and business relationships RTS.
9 March 2026- Consultation closes on RTS for pecuniary sanctions/administrative measures.
8 May 2026- Consultations close on CDD RTS and business relationships/linked transactions RTS.[Source URL: https://www.amf-france.org/en/news-publications/news/amf-invites-financial-market-participants-amlas-consultations-three-draft-amlcft-implementing#xts=607212&xtor=RSS-11&type=RSS]
10 July 2026- AMLA submits final draft RTS to European Commission for adoption.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - These RTS operationalize core AMLR/AMLD6 mandates with July 2027 applicability, demanding immediate consultation input to influence final rules and 18-month lead time for system/process overhauls (e.g., CDD verification sources, harmonized transaction linking). Failure to engage risks non-compliant frameworks amid AMLA's push for EU-wide consistency, elevated direct supervision risks, and stricter enforcement; asset managers face acute challenges from intermediary distribution rules.[Source URL:...
The CSSF has updated its FAQ on portfolio transparency requirements for UCITS ETFs, relaxing disclosure frequency from monthly to quarterly publication of detailed holdings while maintaining daily information sharing with market makers and authorized participants. This change aligns Luxembourg's regulatory framework more closely with Ireland's semi-transparent ETF approach and is designed to attract active asset managers to the Luxembourg domicile by reducing proprietary information exposure.
What Changed
The update modifies two critical FAQ sections:
*Portfolio Transparency Requirements (Question 12.1)
The CSSF has expanded and clarified its guidance to apply to all UCITS ETFs, not just actively managed ones. The key modification establishes a two-tier disclosure framework:
Daily disclosure to market participants: Market makers and authorized participants (APs) continue to receive detailed portfolio information on a daily basis to maintain efficient arbitrage mechanisms and active secondary markets.
Quarterly public disclosure: Investment Fund Managers (IFMs) must now publish detailed...
What You Need To Do
*For IFMs Managing UCITS ETFs
*Update disclosure procedures to transition from monthly to quarterly publication schedules for detailed portfolio holdings
*Maintain daily information sharing with APs and market makers to support arbitrage mechanisms—this requirement remains unchanged
*Revise prospectuses to reflect the new quarterly disclosure frequency and confirm compliance with the 30 business-day publication window
*Document procedures for calculating the 30 business-day deadline from quarter-end
Key Dates
17 February 2026- CSSF publishes updated FAQ (effective immediately)
No explicit transition period stated- Firms should implement changes promptly to ensure compliance with the new quarterly disclosure requirementDEADLINE
CP2/26 is a PRA consultation paper proposing targeted reforms to UK securitisation rules to reduce prescriptiveness and burden while maintaining prudential soundness, building on recent CRR restatements. It matters for compliance professionals as it streamlines due diligence, risk retention, disclosures, and capital treatments, potentially lowering costs for PRA-authorised firms in the securitisation market amid Basel 3.1 implementation. These changes aim to enhance proportionality without compromising investor protection or oversight.
What Changed
The proposals amend PRA rules and supervisory guidance in the Securitisation Part of the PRA Rulebook, including:
Due diligence: Remove prescriptive verification of credit-granting criteria (Chapter 2 Article 9), risk retention (Chapter 2 Article 6 and Chapter 4), STS criteria, specific information availability, ongoing monitoring lists, stress testing, internal reporting to management, and demonstration of understanding to PRA; replace with proportionate consideration of credit-granting standards.
Risk retention: Introduce a new combined modality merging two existing ones.
Market disclosure...
What You Need To Do
Review and respond
Gap analysis
Coordinate with FCA
Policy updates
Monitor legislation
Key Dates
18 May 2026- Consultation response deadline.DEADLINE
1 January 2027- Expected implementation aligning with Basel 3.1 and CRR restatement (PS3/26), with transitional arrangements to 2030.
Post-SI (TBD)- Changes to repository requirements effective upon HM Treasury Statutory Instrument amending UK Securitisation Regulation 2024.
1 January 2026- Related CRR/Solvency II restatement (PS12/25) already effective, preserving core securitisation requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Proposals reduce burden (e.g., less prescriptive due diligence, streamlined disclosures) but require immediate review ahead of 18 May 2026 deadline and 1 January 2027 implementation, aligning with Basel 3.1. Non-response risks misaligned systems during CRR restatement transition; benefits include cost savings and proportionality, but firms must validate ongoing compliance with retained prudential standards.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about a series of similarly designed websites. According to information available to BaFin, the operators are providing banking business and/or financial services on these websites without the required authorisation. The operators of the website are not supervised by BaFin.
This CSSF FAQ (Version 23, updated 17 February 2026) provides interpretive guidance on the Luxembourg Law of 17 December 2010 relating to undertakings for collective investment (UCIs), covering UCITS, Part II UCIs, SIFs, and SICARs. It matters for compliance professionals as it clarifies authorisation processes, investment rules, and supervisory expectations, ensuring alignment with evolving EU frameworks like AIFMD and MiCAR. The update, effective today, addresses recent regulatory shifts including crypto-asset integration.
What Changed
Authorisation Requirements: UCIs require CSSF approval of constitutive documents (articles, management regulations), depositary selection, and management company/AIFM applications for contractual forms. Corporate UCIs need similar approvals for appointed managers.
Crypto-Asset Updates (aligned with separate but related FAQ Version 7): Replaces "virtual assets" with "crypto-assets" per MiCAR (EU 2023/1114); UCITS and retail AIFs (non-well-informed investors) capped at 10% NAV indirect exposure; AIFs for well-informed/professional investors have no cap but require governance, risk management,...
What You Need To Do
Review and Update Documents
Crypto-Specific
Authorisation/Amendments
Governance and Reporting
Ongoing Compliance
Key Dates
17 February 2026 - FAQ Version 23 update effectiveApplies immediately to UCI operations, authorisations, and compliance.[User-provided content]DEADLINE
04 February 2026 - Crypto FAQ Version 7 update effectiveMiCAR-aligned changes on crypto exposure, authorisation extensions, and depositary notifications.
16 January 2026 - UCI Authorisation page updateReflects ongoing CSSF expectations for approvals.
20 May 2025 - Related AIFM FAQ Version 24Introduces changes relevant to UCI managers acting as AIFMs.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The update coincides with MiCAR implementation and today's release, requiring immediate review for crypto-exposed funds to avoid unauthorised strategies or AML gaps; non-compliance risks supervisory actions, authorisation delays, or investor disputes in Luxembourg's key fund domicile.
For which the CSSF is the relevant competent authority under Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of credit default swaps
The FCA has fined Richard Howson £237,700 for his part in misleading statements being issued by Carillion plc. As group chief executive, Mr Howson was aware of serious financial troubles in Carillion’s UK construction business. He failed to reflect this in company announcements or alert its board and audit committee, leading to poor oversight.The fine was imposed after Mr Howson withdrew his challenge to the FCA’s decision.Mr Howson was one of two executive directors on Carillion’s Board. His...
The Bank of England held roundtable meetings with representatives from regulated firms on the responsible adoption of artificial intelligence and machine learning (AI and ML), to better understand the constraints that firms may be facing.
NUS and MAS have jointly appointed Professor Arvind Krishnamurthy as the MAS Distinguished Term Professor in Economics and Finance from 18 to 28 February 2026.
ESMA publishes latest edition of its newsletter 13 February 2026 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published today its latest edition of the Spotlight on Markets Newsletter. This edition opens with ESMA’s Digital and Data Strategies , outlining how enhanced data use and improved digital tools will strengthen effective and risk-based supervision. Top news highlights include the launch of the selection ...
The ECB imposed a €7.55 million periodic penalty payment on Crédit Agricole for failing to complete a climate-related and environmental (C&E) risk materiality assessment by the May 31, 2024 deadline, marking the second enforcement action in the ECB's escalating shift from guidance to active enforcement on climate risk supervision. This enforcement demonstrates that the ECB is moving beyond symbolic warnings to substantial financial penalties, signaling that banks must treat climate risk identification and assessment as mandatory compliance obligations rather than discretionary best practices.
What Changed
The ECB's enforcement action reflects several critical regulatory developments:
*Mandatory Climate Risk Materiality Assessment**
Banks must now conduct comprehensive materiality assessments of climate-related and environmental risks as a binding supervisory requirement, not a guidance recommendation. The assessment must identify all material C&E risks to which the institution is or might be exposed.
*Binding Supervisory Decisions with Enforcement Teeth**
The ECB has transitioned from non-binding guidance (2020) to legally binding decisions with accruing daily penalties for non-compliance.
What You Need To Do
*Immediate (Q1 2026)
related and environmental risks, documenting exposure across the portfolio
*Near-term (H1 2026)
related risks into existing credit risk, operational risk, and market risk frameworks
testing purposes
Key Dates
2020- ECB published non-binding Guide on climate-related and environmental risks
The Securities and Exchange Commission will host the agency’s 45th Annual Government Business Forum on Small Business Capital Formation at SEC headquarters in Washington, D.C., on March 9 from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. ET. The event will be webcast live. …
The Market Participants Group (MPG) is a senior-level forum for financial market participants to share their views on relevant themes and narratives in financial markets with members of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee.
Singapore, 13 February 2026… The Prime Minister and Minister for Finance announced at his 2026 Budget Statement the establishment of a workgroup to develop strategies to strengthen Singapore as a leading centre for growth capital. The Growth Capital Workgroup will be chaired by Mr Chee Hong Tat, Minister for National...
AML/CFT standardised data collection taking place in 2026
AI Analysis
The CSSF Circular Letter 2026-02-12 announces a standardized data collection exercise on AML/CFT for supervised entities, scheduled for 2026, aimed at enhancing regulatory oversight of money laundering and terrorist financing risks. This matters because it signals intensified CSSF scrutiny on AML/CFT compliance, requiring firms to prepare structured data submissions that could inform future supervisory actions, risk assessments, and enforcement. As part of broader CSSF AML/CFT initiatives, non-compliance risks fines or heightened inspections.
What Changed
Introduction of standardized AML/CFT data collection: CSSF mandates uniform reporting formats for collecting data on AML/CFT risks, controls, and practices across supervised sectors, building on existing risk-based supervision frameworks.
Alignment with ongoing AML/CFT enhancements: Complements recent governance-focused circulars (e.g., Circular 26/906 on central administration and risk management for payment/e-money institutions) by emphasizing data-driven validation of AML/CFT effectiveness, including risk assessments, transaction monitoring, and third-party oversight.
No explicit new...
What You Need To Do
Assess and document AML/CFT data readiness
Update governance and controls
Conduct internal reviews
Prepare for submission
Engage auditors
Key Dates
2026 (exact date TBD) - AML/CFT standardised data collection exerciseFirms must submit required data during this period; preparation recommended immediately given today's date (12 February 2026).DEADLINE
20 January 2026 - Issuance of related Circular 26/906Establishes governance baselines (e.g., compliance independence, risk proportionality) informing data collection expectations.DEADLINE
26 January 2026 - CSSF AML/CFT Conference for Specialised PFSProvided updates on sub-sector risks, terrorist financing reviews, and FIU insights relevant to data preparation.
28 January 2026 - Conference materials publishedAvailable for download to guide compliance alignment.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – With data collection in 2026 underway today (12 February 2026), firms face immediate preparation needs amid recent enforcement (e.g., EUR 102,000 fine on depositary for AML-related gaps) and conferences signaling sub-sector focus. This elevates AML/CFT as a supervisory priority, potentially triggering on-site inspections, fines, or remediation orders for inadequate data/risks; proactive alignment prevents escalation in a risk-based regime.
Central Bank of Ireland Deputy Governor Vasileios Madouros spoke at Technological University Dublin on the need to increase domestic investment over the next decade to support Ireland’s long-term economic success. Looking back, Deputy Governor Madouros discussed how, despite very strong economic growth, investment in key domestic sectors has been relatively subdued over the past decade. Looking ahead, like many other countries, Ireland is facing profound economic and societal shifts in years ...
Over the course of the next decade, we will need to allocate more of our collective resources towards domestic investment. 1 In part, that is because of where we are coming from. Despite very strong economic growth in recent years, investment in key domestic sectors has been lacklustre. But it is also because of where are going. Ireland, like many other countries, is facing profound structural transitions. Navigating these will require additional investment in the years ahead. Raising Ireland...
The SFC secured a criminal conviction against retail trader Ng Ka Hei for false trading under section 295 of the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), involving scaffolding and wash trades in shares of six Hong Kong-listed companies from 20 September 2022 to 24 October 2023, resulting in a HK$117,715 profit. On 12 February 2026, the Eastern Magistrates’ Court sentenced him to 220 hours of community service, a fine equal to his profits, and full SFC investigation costs of HK$199,669, emphasizing rehabilitation over imprisonment. This enforcement action reinforces the SFC's commitment to combating market manipulation, serving as a deterrent to protect market integrity and investor confidence.[https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=26PR25]
What Changed
This is an enforcement outcome rather than new regulatory changes; it reaffirms existing prohibitions under section 295 SFO against false trading, defined as creating a false or misleading appearance of active trading or market activity in securities. No new rules or amendments are introduced, but the case highlights SFC scrutiny on specific manipulative techniques: scaffolding (placing and cancelling orders at increasing prices to simulate demand) and wash trading (self-matched trades across accounts to inflate...
What You Need To Do
Conduct staff training on market abuse red flags under SFO section 295, including real-time monitoring obligations per SFC's Code of Conduct
Review client account structures for multi-account trading patterns; flag and report suspicious activity via SFC's market surveillance channels
Update internal policies to mandate profit disgorgement and cost recovery in investigations, aligning with court precedents
Perform gap analysis on compliance programs against SFC enforcement trends, documenting controls for audit trails
Key Dates
20 September 2022 - 24 October 2023Period of Ng's false trading activities.
22 January 2026Conviction on seven counts of false trading (SFC press release date).
12 February 2026Sentencing hearing, resulting in community service order, fine, and costs order.[https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=26PR25]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This case demonstrates SFC's proactive criminal prosecutions for retail-level manipulation, with penalties including non-custodial sentences but full profit confiscation and costs—signaling low tolerance even for modest gains (HK$117,715). Firms must act to fortify surveillance amid rising SFC investigations (501 in Q2 2025, per A&O Shearman), as failure risks intermediary misconduct charges; however, no immediate deadlines apply, allowing phased enhancements.[https://apps.sfc.hk/edistributionWeb/gateway/EN/news-and-announcements/news/doc?refNo=26PR25]
This CSSF FAQ (Version 2, July 2013, with updates through 24 June 2013 and 11 July 2013) provides guidance on master-feeder structures for UCITS funds under the Luxembourg Law of 12 July 2010 (the "2010 Law"), addressing financial reporting, performance disclosure, and operational requirements. It matters for Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS managers and depositaries as it clarifies compliance with UCITS Directive rules on aggregation of charges, audit irregularities, and past performance in cross-border master-feeder setups, reducing ambiguity in documentation and investor communications.
What Changed
Financial reporting for aggregate charges (Art 82(2) 2010 Law): When master and feeder UCITS have different year-ends, feeder must present master charges for the same period if possible; otherwise, use master's last audited period with strict conditions (e.g., clear audit report disclosure, no undue costs), and agreements must mandate information provision.
Disclosure of irregularities (CSSF Regulation 10-05 Art 27(e)): Present in notes to financial statements or "other information" section of annual report.
Past performance rules (Art 159(3)c) 2010 Law and Commission Regulation (EU)...
What You Need To Do
Review and amend master-feeder agreements (per Art 79(1) 2010 Law) to require masters provide charge/fee data to feeders
Ensure financial statements/annual reports disclose irregularities in specified sections and aggregate charges with audit report caveats if periods misalign
Update KIIDs and marketing materials for past performance compliance, disclosing conversions/material changes per Regulation 583/2010 Articles 17, 19, 35
Implement processes for ad hoc financial statements when accounting years differ, allocating audit/preparation fees appropriately
Monitor CSSF website regularly for FAQ updates
Compliance Impact
Urgency: low—This 2013 guidance (Version 2) is outdated relative to 2026, with no new enforcement actions noted, but remains relevant for legacy UCITS master-feeder structures under the 2010 Law. It matters for audit/financial close processes and investor disclosures to avoid CSSF scrutiny, particularly in cross-border setups where ESMA UCITS rules apply; non-compliance risks reporting errors or investor complaints.
This publication is a CSSF FAQ in relation to the use by Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS of the following Securities Financing Transactions: securities lending transactions, reverse repurchase agreement transactions and repurchase agreement transactions. The objective of the FAQ is to bring further clarity concerning the use by UCITS of these SFTs, thereby taking into account the applicable regulatory framework as well as the supervisory experienced gained by the CSSF over the last years.Version 2
AI Analysis
This CSSF FAQ (Version 2) provides guidance on the use of securities financing transactions (SFTs)—specifically securities lending, reverse repurchase agreements, and repurchase agreements—by Luxembourg-domiciled UCITS, clarifying regulatory requirements based on the applicable framework and CSSF's supervisory experience. It matters because it updates prior guidance to reflect evolved practices, helping UCITS managers ensure compliant SFT usage amid heightened scrutiny on liquidity, risk management, and investor protection in Luxembourg's fund sector.
What Changed
The document is an updated FAQ (Version 2), originally published on 18 December 2020 and revised on 12 February 2026, but the provided content does not detail specific changes from Version 1 beyond incorporating recent supervisory experience and regulatory framework updates. It emphasizes clarity on SFT eligibility, operational controls, and risk mitigation for UCITS, without introducing new prohibitions or mandates visible in the summary; full details require accessing the PDF (201.4Kb).
What You Need To Do
Review and update policies
Enhance disclosures
Conduct gap analysis
Train staff and delegates
Monitor ongoing use
Key Dates
18 December 2020 - Original publication date of Version 1.
12 February 2026 - Update date for Version 2(effective immediately as non-binding guidance).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – The 12 February 2026 update coincides with today's date, signaling immediate relevance for Luxembourg UCITS engaging in SFTs, which are common for yield enhancement but carry liquidity and counterparty risks. Non-compliance risks supervisory actions, given CSSF's focus on practical experience; firms should prioritize review to avoid findings in upcoming audits or inspections, especially amid parallel 2026 updates on UCI investments.
Reply to Adjournment Motion on “An Industrial Policy in Finance” by Mr Chee Hong Tat, Minister for National Development, and Deputy Chairman of MAS, on behalf of Mr Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry, and Chairman of MAS, on 12 February 2026
The expansion of the EQDP will enable more high-quality asset managers with strategies that invest significantly in Singapore equities to be funded, and also catalyse more third-party investments into the equities market.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about Nex (Limited) and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website thenexcap(.)pro of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
We have signed an Exchange of Letters with the International Financial Services Centres Authority (IFSCA). IFSCA is the unified regulator for financial institutions operating in Gujarat International Finance Tec-City (GIFT City), India’s first international financial services centre.This agreement affirms both authorities’ commitment to develop our regulatory relationship.Download our letter (PDF)The letters set out the intention to share regulatory knowledge and best practice to support the ...
AI Analysis
The FCA has signed an Exchange of Letters with India's IFSCA, the regulator for GIFT City, to foster regulatory cooperation, knowledge sharing, and stronger links between UK financial markets and GIFT City. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals expanding cross-border ties, potentially easing market access and harmonizing standards for firms operating between the UK and India, amid the FCA's broader global outreach strategy. No binding rules are imposed, but it sets the stage for future alignment in areas like fintech and financial services.
What Changed
There are no direct regulatory changes or new requirements imposed by this Exchange of Letters. It is a non-binding agreement focused on:
Sharing regulatory knowledge and best practices.
Supporting financial services development in both jurisdictions.
Promoting links between GIFT City and UK markets.
The letters affirm commitment to developing the regulatory relationship, with an additional step of posting an FCA Financial Services Attaché to the British Deputy High Commission in Mumbai later in 2026 [FCA publication].
What You Need To Do
binding nature
Review and download the full Exchange of Letters (PDF available via FCA site) to understand shared priorities
Assess current India/GIFT City exposures and prepare for potential future information-sharing requests or aligned standards
Monitor FCA news for follow-up developments, such as joint guidance on fintech or market access https://www
Engage with FCA international teams if planning cross-border activities in GIFT City
Key Dates
Later in 2026- Posting of FCA Financial Services Attaché to British Deputy High Commission in Mumbai to support regulatory relationship development [FCA publication].
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low - This is a cooperative MoU-style letter exchange without immediate rules, penalties, or obligations, posing minimal disruption risk. It matters strategically for long-term planning, as it could lead to simplified compliance for UK-India activities (e.g., reduced dual-regulation friction) and aligns with FCA's pattern of global pacts that indirectly shape supervisory expectations. Firms with India exposure should note it for horizon scanning, but no urgent resourcing is needed.
Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) borrowers will benefit from stronger protections from 15 July 2026, following the Government's decision to bring the sector under the FCA's regulation. BNPL will be subject to the Consumer Duty and consumers will benefit from:Clear information: Consumers will get clear, upfront details about their agreement, including when payments will be due, amounts, and what happens if they miss a payment.Affordability checks: Lenders must carry out proportionate checks to make su...
Guidance allowing financial entities to identify the National Competent Authority to which their register of information has to be submitted.
AI Analysis
This CSSF guidance document, published on 11 February 2026, provides detailed explanations and resolution steps for error messages encountered during the submission of the DORA Register of Information (RoI) via the eDesk portal, specifically for the 2026 submission cycle. It matters because it enables Luxembourg financial entities to ensure compliant submissions amid enhanced validation checks on more data fields, avoiding re-submission delays and supporting timely transmission to the ESAs by CSSF deadlines. Non-compliance risks supervisory scrutiny under DORA's ICT risk management framework.
What Changed
Enhanced validation checks for the 2026 RoI submission: Applies ESA-defined checks (last updated April 2025) to more data fields to improve data quality, compared to prior cycles.
Specific error resolutions detailed, including requirements for LEI code communication to CSSF beforehand, correct reference date ('2025-12-31') in file naming, plain-CSV files in predefined .zip structure, and proper FilingIndicators.csv/parameters.csv content.
Mandatory inclusion of all tables (even empty) in FilingIndicators.csv set to 'true', with matching identification codes across parent-child records.
Builds...
What You Need To Do
Assign "DORA Reporting" role in eDesk to dedicated employee(s) per user guide
Communicate LEI code to CSSF line supervisor prior to first submission to enable upload
Prepare RoI in plain-CSV files within
Test submissions against listed error codes (e
Consult ESAs' EBA resources (data point model, validation rules, FAQs) and CSSF guides (e
Key Dates
31 December 2025- Reference date for 2026 RoI submission (all contractual arrangements up to this date).
11 February 2026- Publication date of this error guidance (last updated 10/02/2026).
1 April 2025 to 15 April 2025- Initial 2025 submission window via eDesk (for context; 2026 window likely similar, pending confirmation).
30 April 2025- CSSF re-submission deadline post-validation for 2025; analogous for 2026 if errors detected.DEADLINE
May 2025- ESAs' second-round validation for 2025; expect similar for 2026 with potential re-submissions.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Published today (11 February 2026), this equips firms for imminent 2026 RoI submissions (reference date 31 December 2025), with stricter validations on expanded fields risking rejections/re-submissions. Matters for operational resilience compliance under DORA Article 28, as accurate RoI supports supervisory oversight of ICT third-party risks; delays could trigger CSSF/ESA follow-up or fines. Firms with prior 2025 issues (e.g., portal extensions to May 2025) must prioritize to avoid recurrence.
finanzpluss, allegedly based in Frankfurt am Main, offers loans on its website for high fees, without the necessary authorisation, which are not paid out.
I would like to welcome you all to the Central Bank of Ireland today 1 . We are delighted to host this gathering of EU Heads of Missions, representatives of our friends and partners from across the EU. A little over a year ago I had the pleasure to meet with you all. I spoke then of a geopolitical landscape facing significant strain and complexity; of the rise of economic nationalism and trade disputes; as well as the shift from cooperation to competition, and its impact on our ability to mee...
AI Analysis
This speech by Central Bank of Ireland (CBI) Governor Gabriel Makhlouf outlines priorities for building economic and financial resilience amid geopolitical risks, climate change, technological shifts, and geoeconomic fragmentation, emphasizing domestic policy focus areas like infrastructure, indigenous business growth, and fiscal buffers. It matters for compliance professionals as it previews CBI's forthcoming 2026 regulatory and supervisory priorities, signaling heightened scrutiny on operational and financial resilience, consumer protection, and alignment with a transforming regulatory framework. https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/speech-governor-makhlouf-head-eu-missions-10-February-2026
What Changed
This is a forward-looking speech, not announcing immediate regulatory changes, but it references CBI's ongoing transformation agenda, including:
Four overarching supervisory priorities for 2026: (1) Maintaining/building resilience to geopolitical/macro-financial risks (operational and financial resilience); (2) Securing consumer/investor interests; plus two others implied in related releases (e.g., governance, financial crime).
What You Need To Do
Review and prepare for priorities
Enhance resilience planning
Engage on consultations
Sector-specific
Proactive supervision prep
Key Dates
Next few weeks from 11 February 2026- Publication of CBI's full 2026 Regulatory and Supervisory Priorities. https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/speech-governor-makhlouf-head-eu-missions-10-February-2026
H1 2026- Consultation on new Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) Framework. https://maples.com/regulatory-round-up/central-bank-of-ireland-update-and-supervisory-approach-for-2026-fund-service-providers https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/regulation/transforming-regulation-and-supervision/regulating-supervising-well-a-more-effective-and-efficient-framework.pdf
Shortly (2026)- Launch of comprehensive Fund Service Provider (FSP) Framework review. https://www.centralbank.ie/docs/default-source/regulation/transforming-regulation-and-supervision/regulating-supervising-well-a-more-effective-and-efficient-framework.pdf
2025-2026- Ongoing implementation of banking/payments supervisory activities and multi-year roadmap (supervision, regulation, gatekeeping, reporting). https://www.matheson.com/insights/fig-top-5-at-5-06-03-2025/ https://www.centralbank.ie/news/article/press-release-central-bank-of-ireland-publishes-roadmap-to-deliver-a-more-effective-and-efficient-regulatory-framework-10-december-2025
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium—This speech signals strategic direction rather than enforceable rules, but imminent priorities publication and 2026 consultations demand proactive preparation to avoid intensified supervision/enforcement. It matters because CBI emphasizes resilience in a high-risk environment (geopolitics, AI, climate), with non-compliance risking closer scrutiny under new integrated approach; firms ignoring this could face heightened operational reviews amid efficiency drive without standards reduction. https://www.centralbank.ie/regulation/transforming-regulation-and-supervision
The Central Bank of Ireland has set out its regulatory and supervisory priorities for 2026 and provided detailed advice to Government on building economic resilience in the face of unprecedented uncertainty. In his letter to the Tánaiste and Minister for Finance Simon Harris, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf set out his views on the macro-financial environment, the financial services landscape and the Central Bank of Ireland’s financial regulation priorities for the year ahead . Governor Makhlouf em...
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
This CSSF communiqué announces the availability of updated UCI Reports (SAQ, SR, and ML) under Circular CSSF 21/790 on the eDesk platform's CISERO module for specific 2026 year-ends, with key enhancements focused on valuation, NAV determination, and risk-based streamlining. It matters for Luxembourg UCIs as it reflects evolving supervisory priorities, aligns with EU directives like Directive (EU) 2024/927, and imposes refined self-assessment obligations to bolster resilience in stressed conditions and liquidity management.
What Changed
SAQ Updates (Valuation Section): New questions on valuation policies for stressed market conditions/exceptional circumstances; coverage for new sub-funds/strategies; independent validation of material valuation models; and risk-based backtesting for model-valued investments comprising significant NAV portions.
SAQ Simplifications and Clarifications: Removed questions on sub-funds with significant non-standard OTC derivatives, unquoted assets, or external valuer OTC FDIs (including NAV proportions); refined wording on conflicts of interest; added sub-questions (e.g., stale valuations); updated...
What You Need To Do
Access updated Reports on eDesk CISERO module immediately and review changes vs
Update valuation policies/procedures to explicitly cover stressed conditions, new sub-funds/strategies, model validations, and backtesting; document compliance
Revise NAV processes for LMT alignment with Directive (EU) 2024/927 Annexes and ESMA performance fee guidelines; confirm for open-ended UCIs
Dirigeants/management
Train staff on updates; conduct gap analysis on policies (e
Key Dates
9 February 2026Reports (SAQ, SR, ML) made available on eDesk CISERO for year-ends 31 January, 28 February, 31 March, 30 April 2026.
Financial year-end +5 months (UCITS/Part II UCIs)SAQ/SR submission deadline.DEADLINE
Three months before year-end (post-30 April 2026)Future Reports availability.
16 April 2026Entry into application of AIFM/UCITS Review Directive LMT requirements.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate access required for imminent submissions (e.g., 31 January 2026 year-end due ~June 2026); new valuation questions demand policy reviews to avoid supervisory findings, especially amid stressed markets; SR simplifications reduce burden but shift focus to SAQ self-assessment, heightening dirigeants' accountability. Non-compliance risks CSSF follow-up on modified audits or weaknesses, per Circular 21/790.
The FCA has begun legal proceedings against global crypto exchange HTX (formerly Huobi) for illegally promoting cryptoasset services to UK consumers. Access documents on this claim on the FCA websiteFirms providing crypto products to UK consumers need to comply with rules which protect consumers from unfair and misleading marketing. Advertising cryptoassets on social media or websites without complying with these rules is a criminal offence.Since the rules came into force in October 2023, the...
FCA v Huobi Global S.A. and Others. On 21 October 2025, the FCA commenced proceedings in the Chancery Division of the High Court against the following parties:HUOBI GLOBAL S.A.(a company incorporated in Panama)PERSONS UNKNOWN (who are the owner of, controller and/or the persons currently in control of all or part of www.htx.com and/or its associated mobile applications (“the HTX Exchange”))PERSONS UNKNOWN (who are the legal and/or natural persons defined as the HTX Operators in the HTX Platfo...
AI Analysis
The FCA has initiated civil proceedings in the High Court against Huobi Global S.A. (HTX, formerly Huobi) and multiple categories of "Persons Unknown" for unlawfully promoting cryptoasset services to UK consumers without authorisation, breaching the financial promotions regime. This action underscores the FCA's aggressive enforcement against unauthorised crypto entities targeting UK retail investors, signaling heightened scrutiny on overseas platforms. Compliance teams must note this as evidence of the regulator's willingness to pursue novel legal strategies like "Persons Unknown" claims to enforce compliance extraterritorially.[https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/htx-huobi-legal-proceedings]
What Changed
This is not a policy change but an enforcement action highlighting existing requirements under the UK's financial promotions regime (effective October 2023 for cryptoassets), which mandates FCA registration under anti-money laundering (AML) rules and compliance with promotion standards for all firms—domestic or foreign—marketing to UK consumers. Key elements include prohibitions on unauthorised promotions, with the FCA now using High Court proceedings to target operators, owners, controllers, and even future controllers up to 31 October 2028.
What You Need To Do
Immediate audit
Self-identification
Compliance checks
Social media monitoring
Documentation
Key Dates
21 October 2025- FCA commences proceedings via Claim Form in Chancery Division, High Court.
2 October 2025- Particulars of Claim dated (note: precedes claim form, likely preparatory).
22 October 2025- Application Notice for service out of jurisdiction/alternative means.
4 February 2026- High Court (Deputy Master Dovar) grants permission to serve proceedings out of jurisdiction and by alternative means.
31 October 2028- Cut-off for "Persons Unknown" category covering new owners/controllers/promoters.[https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/htx-huobi-legal-proceedings]
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This sets a precedent for extraterritorial enforcement via "Persons Unknown" claims, extending liability to unidentified/future actors, which amplifies risks for non-UK crypto firms. It matters because post-October 2023 rules have seen positive compliance from most, but FCA vows action against outliers, potentially leading to injunctions, fines, or asset freezes; authorised firms face contagion risks via associations.[https://www.fca.org.uk/news/statements/htx-huobi-legal-proceedings]
The FCA has fined Dipesh Kerai and Bhavesh Hirani for insider dealing in shares of Bidstack Group Plc. Mr Kerai has been fined £52,731, and Mr Hirani has been fined £56,000.In December 2021, Mr Hirani was the interim Chief Financial Officer at Bidstack, a company that placed advertising inside video games. This meant he had access to inside information about a major upcoming deal between Bidstack and a large video game publisher.Before it was announced to the public, Mr Hirani passed this con...
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Volfor and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website volfor(.)co of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
Not for distribution, directly or indirectly, in or into the United States, Canada, Australia, Japan or any other jurisdiction where it is unlawful to distribute this announcement
Supervision Asset management Journalists Investment management companies The Autorité des Marchés Financiers publishes the findings of its inspections of asset management companies' operational risk management
Green notices cover significant and/or significant proposals for Bank of England reporting. If any of these proposals are finalised and are to be implemented, they will appear in a statistical notice.
AI Analysis
Green Notice 2026/01 from the Bank of England (BoE) updates the consultation on discontinuing Form BN data collection, which tracks non-resident business by UK Monetary Financial Institutions (MFIs), following positive feedback on burden reduction but with a pause due to Office for National Statistics (ONS) reliance. Firms must continue reporting Form BN indefinitely pending BoE's assessment of alternatives like Forms CC and CL. This matters for compliance teams as it maintains current reporting obligations while signaling potential future relief, avoiding premature process changes.
What Changed
No immediate discontinuation of Form BN; BoE is assessing Forms CC and CL as alternatives to meet ONS needs, considering data suitability, methodological impacts, and cost-benefit trade-offs.
Consultation feedback confirmed no objections to discontinuation and broad agreement on reduced burden, though some firms noted limited savings due to integrated reporting processes.
Any final changes will be via a future Statistical Notice; proposed end-date (April 2026 reference period) from Green Notice 2025/01 remains tentative.
What You Need To Do
Continue submitting Form BN as per current thresholds and schedules; do not discontinue reporting
Monitor BoE statistics notices for updates on assessment outcomes and any confirmed changes
Review internal processes for Forms CC and CL to prepare for potential expanded use or adjustments if Form BN ends
If previously provided feedback, no further action needed on consultation (closed)
Key Dates
31 December 2025- Consultation feedback deadline on original Form BN discontinuation proposal (now closed; summarized in this notice).DEADLINE
April 2026- Proposed final reference period for Form BN data collection (tentative, pending assessment).
May 2026- Proposed final publication date for Form BN data (tentative).
TBD- Completion of BoE assessment on Forms CC/CL alternatives and issuance of further Statistical Notice with confirmed changes.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Firms face no new burdens or changes yet, but must sustain Form BN reporting to avoid non-compliance risks, as explicitly required. This matters because premature cessation could disrupt ONS statistics and invite regulatory scrutiny; however, low urgency stems from no fixed end-date and positive feedback on eventual burden reduction, allowing time for monitoring without immediate resource reallocation.
The SFC reprimanded and fined Kylin International (HK) Co., Limited $9 million for systemic failures in managing private sub-funds from August 2018 to July 2021, including unmanaged conflicts of interest, inadequate reconciliations/valuations, weak KYC/suitability controls, AML/CTF record-keeping lapses, and misrepresentations to investors. This enforcement action underscores the SFC's heightened scrutiny of private fund managers, emphasizing senior management accountability and robust systems/controls to protect market integrity. Compliance professionals should note it as a deterrent signal, aligning with recent SFC circulars on escalating penalties for persistent misconduct.
What Changed
This is an enforcement action, not a new rule change, but it reinforces and exemplifies existing obligations under the Securities and Futures Ordinance (SFO), Fund Manager Code of Conduct (FMCC), and related guidelines:
Mandatory conflict management and disclosure: Firms must identify, manage, and disclose conflicts, e.g., loans from the manager or directors to funds.
Asset reconciliation and valuation: Monthly reconciliations, regular valuations, and independent audits of fund financials are required.
KYC/suitability assessments: Adequate systems/controls for client due diligence and...
What You Need To Do
Conduct gap analysis
Enhance systems/controls
Senior management oversight
Investor communications
Thematic preparation
Key Dates
August 2018 - July 2021Period of Kylin's violations.
Late 2020SFC limited review prompted Kylin's remedial measures.
31 December 2023Kylin ceased regulated activities.
22 January 2025SFC revoked Kylin's Type 9 license (following application).
19 March 2025SFC disciplinary action against Mr. Steven Wong Yung (press release).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - This signals SFC's enforcement escalation for private fund misconduct, with $9M fine despite clean record and remediation, prioritizing deterrence over mitigation. Firms face license revocation risks, personal sanctions on ROs/MICs (e.g., Wong/Zhu actions), and thematic inspections; non-compliance erodes investor confidence and invites harsher penalties per 2024 circular.
This FSCA publication lists multiple active and draft consultation documents primarily focused on capital markets regulations (e.g., JSE rules amendments) and collective investment schemes (CIS) standards, inviting stakeholder input on proposed changes to enhance market integrity, trading mechanisms, and governance. It matters for compliance professionals as it signals imminent updates to listing requirements, equities rules, and conduct standards that could reshape operational, disclosure, and access protocols in South Africa's financial markets, requiring proactive review to avoid enforcement risks. https://www.fsca.co.za/Document-For-Consultation [FSCA source].
What Changed
Capital Markets: Proposed amendments to JSE listing requirements (e.g., Market Segmentation project, Delegation via BN 640/668 of 2024); JSE Equities Rules changes for Off-Book BookBuild Trades (BN 680), Dealings in Krugerrands (Board Notice 548), Trading Member Access (Board Notice 618); Strate (Pty) Ltd Rules amendments (Board Notice 4276, Proposed Strate Rule Amendments 26 January 2024); Draft FSCA FM Notice and explanatory memoranda on these topics; Discussion documents on benchmarks, collateral expansion, recovery plans, and market infrastructure conduct standards.
Collective Investment...
What You Need To Do
Review and submit comments on proposed amendments using FSCA templates (e
Assess internal policies against changes (e
For market infrastructures
Monitor FSCA portals for explanatory memoranda and participate in discussions; update compliance programs for any finalized rules post-consultation
Key Dates
20192024); as of February 2026, verify current status via FSCA site, as some may be finalized or extended per ongoing regulatory plans.
29 November 2019Comments on Draft Exemption Notice 1 of 2019 (CISCA) for managers/auditors.
31 July 2017Closing for NAV Calculation Valuation Standard and Guidelines.
4 December 2020Submissions on Draft Conduct Standard for CIS Advertising, Marketing, Disclosure.
15 February 2021Submissions on Draft Conduct Standard for CIS Governance, Fit and Proper.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Many consultations are dated (pre-2025), suggesting some may be resolved, but 2024 items (e.g., JSE amendments, Strate notices) align with FSCA's active 2024-2027 Regulation Plan and 2025-2028 Strategy, risking enforcement if finalized without preparation. Matters due to potential impacts on trading operations, market access, and CIS conduct in a FATF grey-list context, where non-compliance could trigger penalties or supervision.
This FSCA "Enforcement Matters" publication details the regulator's ongoing supervisory enforcement activities, primarily through curatorships imposed on non-compliant financial institutions under South African financial sector laws. It matters for compliance professionals as it exemplifies the FSCA's readiness to escalate to court-ordered curatorships and administrative penalties for serious breaches, signaling a robust enforcement posture to deter misconduct and protect market integrity.
What Changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced; this is a static resource page listing historical and ongoing enforcement outcomes, focused on curatorship reports and court orders. It underscores the FSCA's established powers to apply remedial actions like curatorships (court-appointed oversight of failing institutions) and administrative penalties, with appeals available to the Tribunal. Key themes include prolonged curatorships for cases involving FAIS (Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act) violations, asset mismanagement, and failure to comply with financial laws.
What You Need To Do
Monitor ongoing curatorships
Strengthen governance and reporting
Prepare for escalation
Proactive remediation
Key Dates
spanning 2010–2024, with no forward-looking deadlines; it reflects ongoing or historical matters rather than new timelines. Key historical dates include:DEADLINE
30 June 2011Curator's Report to Court (initial CMM report).
19 February 20166th Curators Report Order (Ovation).
31 May 2019Addendum to Curators' 19th Report (Fidentia).
4 September 2023CMM Curator's 15th Report (most recent listed).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters as a stark reminder of FSCA's curatorship tool for severe, persistent non-compliance, particularly in investment mismanagement, which can lead to loss of control and reputational damage. While not announcing new rules, it highlights long-running cases (e.g., 15+ years for some), urging firms to prioritize governance and FAIS adherence amid FSCA's 2025-2028 strategy for increased enforcement transparency and actions.
We have published a letter to trade associations to provide an update in the development of a Future Entity (FE) for open banking. The letter confirms the appointment of KPMG to provide an independent assessment of proposals to establish a standards-setting body for UK open banking APIs that is capable of becoming the Future Entity. It explains the purpose and scope of the assessment, the respective roles of the FCA, industry, trade associations and the independent assessor, and how firms can...
AI Analysis
The FCA has appointed KPMG to conduct an independent assessment of proposals for establishing a **Future Entity** – a standards-setting body for UK open banking APIs that will replace Open Banking Limited. This initiative is critical because it establishes the governance framework for open banking ahead of new legislative powers the FCA will receive under the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, with a statutory instrument expected by end-2026.
What Changed
The regulatory landscape for UK open banking is undergoing fundamental restructuring:
Transition of regulatory authority: The FCA is becoming the primary regulator for open banking, replacing the Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC).
Future Entity establishment: A new standards-setting body will become the primary UK standard-setting organization for open banking APIs, responsible for setting and maintaining common standards for minimum service and interoperability, monitoring API performance, and providing directory and certification services.
Independent assessment process: KPMG...
What You Need To Do
*For industry participants and trade associations
*Engage with the assessment process
*Arrange FCA Q&A sessions
*Coalesce behind proposals
*Prepare for VRP implementation
Key Dates
February 2026– Independent assessment process begins; KPMG commences evaluation of proposals
Q1 2026– Final design of Future Entity expected; live transactions expected through VRP scheme
Before March 2026– FCA's Open Finance roadmap due for publicationDEADLINE
Early April 2026– KPMG delivers final assessment report; FCA publishes on its website
From April 2026– Industry and regulators collaborate to progress establishment activity
According to the information available to the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), unknown persons are using WhatsApp groups and chats to contact German investors. The initiators of such WhatsApp groups claim to be Bank of America or its branch in Frankfurt am Main. This is a case of identity fraud misusing names of former employees of the institution.
Administrative sanction imposed on Corestate Capital Holding S.A.
AI Analysis
The CSSF published an administrative sanction on 6 February 2026 against Corestate Capital Holding S.A., likely for breaches in regulatory compliance such as depositary duties, oversight, or governance under Luxembourg financial laws, marking a repeat enforcement action following a prior sanction in June 2025. This matters for compliance professionals as it underscores CSSF's aggressive enforcement on alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs) and depositaries, signaling heightened scrutiny on safekeeping, oversight, and internal controls to prevent systemic risks in Luxembourg's fund sector. It highlights the regulator's willingness to impose public nominative sanctions, amplifying reputational damage alongside fines.
What Changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced; this is an enforcement action enforcing existing obligations under laws like the AIFM Law of 12 July 2013 (e.g., Articles 19(8), 19(9), 19(11) on safekeeping and oversight duties), the Law of 5 April 1993 on the financial sector, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 231/2013 (CDR 231/2013, e.g., Articles 92, 94, 96 on risk assessment, valuation verification, and cash flow monitoring).
What You Need To Do
Conduct immediate gap analysis
Enhance oversight duties
Strengthen governance
Firm-wide audit
Training and reporting
Key Dates
20 June 2025- Prior administrative sanction imposed on Corestate Capital Holding S.A., indicating ongoing non-compliance issues.DEADLINE
6 February 2026- Publication date of the current administrative sanction on Corestate Capital Holding S.A., effective immediately as a public enforcement notice.
February 2023–January 2024 for similar cases).
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This represents CSSF's pattern of public nominative fines (e.g., EUR 102,000 on JTC for depositary breaches, EUR 10,000 on Capitalis for AML non-cooperation), with escalation risks for repeat violations like Corestate's back-to-back sanctions. It matters due to Luxembourg's dominance in European fund assets (over EUR 5 trillion), where governance lapses can trigger outflows, license revocation, or cross-border ESMA scrutiny; firms must act preemptively to mitigate fines (typically EUR 10,000–102,000) and reputational harm from nominative publication.
Administrative sanction imposed on Corestate Capital Holding S.A.
AI Analysis
The CSSF published an administrative sanction on 6 February 2026 against Corestate Capital Holding S.A., likely imposing a fine for regulatory breaches, marking a repeat enforcement action following a prior sanction on the same entity dated 20 June 2025. This matters as it underscores CSSF's intensified supervisory scrutiny on Luxembourg-based investment managers, particularly regarding governance, asset safekeeping, and oversight duties under AIFM Law, signaling heightened enforcement risks for similar firms. Compliance teams should review it for patterns in depositary and transparency violations evident in recent CSSF cases.
What Changed
No new regulatory changes or requirements are introduced; this is an enforcement action highlighting non-compliance with existing obligations under Luxembourg's AIFM Law (notably Articles 19(8), 19(9), 19(11), and 51) and related delegated regulations like CDR 231/2013. Key breaches from analogous recent CSSF sanctions include inadequate safekeeping of assets (e.g., missing ownership verification and records), failure to oversee AIFM valuation policies and cash remittance timelines, improper delegation to custodians without due diligence, and weak internal governance such as conflicts of...
What You Need To Do
Enhance oversight processes
Strengthen governance
For issuers like Corestate
Key Dates
20 June 2025- Prior administrative sanction imposed on Corestate Capital Holding S.A..
6 February 2026- Publication date of the current administrative sanction on Corestate Capital Holding S.A..
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This represents repeat enforcement on Corestate (second sanction in under a year), aligning with CSSF's pattern of nominative publications for severe, ongoing breaches in depositary and governance areas, as seen in JTC (EUR 102,000 fine for similar safekeeping/oversight failures) and BigRep SE (EUR 10,000 for reporting lapses). It elevates risks of fines, reputational damage, and market jeopardy assessments under AIFM Law Article 51, urging preemptive remediation amid CSSF's active 2023-2026 inspection cycle.
In his latest blog, Governor Gabriel Makhlouf explains why the Governing Council kept its main policy interest rate (the deposit facility rate) unchanged at 2% for the fifth consecutive time since June 2025.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the company Tradeshark24 and the services it is offering. BaFin suspects the unknown operators of the website tradeshark24(.)com of offering consumers financial, investment and crypto-asset services without the required authorisation. These offers are not provided by Frankfurt Financial Solutions GmbH & Co. KG, Frankfurt, which has no connection to the website tradeshark24(.)com. This is a case of identity fraud.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website hashxcapital(.)com. BaFin has information that the website’s operators are using it to offer banking business and/or financial services without the required authorisation. The operators are not supervised by BaFin.
More attractive working conditions and lower operating costs per workstation: FINMA will relocate its Zurich office from the city centre to Zurich-Oerlikon in autumn 2026.
From 6 April 2026, Gemini is closing all customer accounts in the UK. Gemini Payments UK, Ltd (GPUK) is authorised by the FCA to issue electronic money (e-money) and provide payment services.Gemini Intergalactic UK, Ltd (GIUK) offers cryptoasset products. These activities are not regulated by the FCA, although we oversee compliance in accordance with UK anti-money laundering regulations. On 5 February 2026, GPUK and GIUK confirmed they plan to exit the UK market. Effective 6 April 2026, Gemin...
This article provides an update regarding implementing changes for country grouping conventions used in statistics covering the international business of monetary financial institutions operating in the UK and the consolidated claims of UK headquartered monetary financial institutions.
FINRA publishes Notices to provide firms with timely information on a variety of issues. To obtain a Notice published prior to 1995, please contact FINRA MediaSource at (240) 386-4200.
The Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Economic and Risk Analysis (DERA) has published two new reports on exchange traded funds and fund mergers, and updated statistics and data visualizations on municipal advisors, transfer agents, and…
MiCA Investment services The AMF reminds Digital Asset Service Providers that the transitional period allowing them to continue providing crypto-asset services in France without MiCA authorisation ends on 1 July 2026
Join us for ESMA’s Conference “A new era for EU capital markets” on 21 May 2026 05 February 2026 About ESMA The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, is organising a high‑level conference “A new era for EU capital markets” on 21 May 2026 in Paris, France. Marking ESMA’s 15-year anniversary, the conference will bring together senior policymakers, regulators, leaders of major market infrastructures and financial institutions, as w...
The FCA has imposed restrictions on independent financial adviser Advantage Wealth Management Ltd (AWM), which means it must not dispose of any assets or conduct any regulated activities without the written consent of the FCA. The action follows concerns that AWM is not being managed in a way that ensures that its affairs are conducted in a sound and prudent manner. We issued a First Supervisory Notice (PDF)on 22 December 2025, outlining further details about our concerns and the basis for im...
The CFTC has withdrawn its 2024 proposed rulemaking on "Event Contracts" (which sought to prohibit political event contracts) and the 2025 Staff Advisory (No. 25-36) on sports event contracts, signaling a policy shift under new Chairman Michael S. Selig toward promoting innovation via new rulemaking. This matters because it removes prior restrictive guidance, reduces immediate compliance burdens on prediction market operators, and opens the door for lawful event contracts while hinting at CFTC asserting exclusive jurisdiction over these derivatives.
What Changed
Withdrawal of the June 10, 2024, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking titled “Event Contracts,” which proposed prohibiting political event contracts as contrary to public interest (e.g., akin to war or terrorism outcomes); CFTC confirms no final rules will issue from this proposal.
Withdrawal of CFTC Staff Letter 25-36 (issued Sept.
What You Need To Do
Review and disregard prior compliance programs built around the 2024 proposal or 2025 advisory (e
Monitor CFTC docket for new event contracts rulemaking notice and provide comments during any future consultation period
Assess current offerings for event contracts under existing Commodity Exchange Act prohibitions (e
Evaluate litigation exposure, especially state gaming regulator actions; prepare for potential CFTC intervention asserting exclusive jurisdiction
No immediate prohibitions lifted or mandates imposed—continue operating within current CEA framework (e
Key Dates
June 10, 2024- Publication of withdrawn "Event Contracts" Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.
September 30, 2025- Issuance of withdrawn CFTC Staff Letter 25-36 (Sports Event Contracts Advisory).
February 4, 2026- CFTC announcement withdrawing both the 2024 proposal and 2025 advisory; no final rules from 2024 proposal; new rulemaking to advance.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – This withdrawal immediately eliminates overhang from restrictive proposals/advisories, allowing firms to pivot from prohibition compliance to innovation planning without urgent deadlines. It matters for reducing uncertainty in prediction markets but requires vigilance for new rules, jurisdictional fights, and insider trading clarity, as platforms like Polymarket face ongoing scrutiny.
The Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (CSSF) has updated its FAQ on crypto-asset investments by undertakings for collective investment, effective February 4, 2026, to align with the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). This update establishes clear investment limits and licensing requirements for UCITS and AIFs investing in crypto-assets, fundamentally reshaping how Luxembourg-regulated funds can structure crypto exposure.
What Changed
The regulatory framework introduces several material modifications:
*Investment Exposure Limits
UCITS may invest indirectly in crypto-assets for a maximum of 10% of their net asset value (NAV)**. These indirect investments are restricted to transferable securities that do not embed derivatives. AIFs open to retail investors other than well-informed investors face the same 10% NAV ceiling.
*MiCAR Alignment**
The FAQ modifications directly reflect the entry into force of Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on markets in crypto-assets.
What You Need To Do
*For UCITS Managers
by-case assessment of crypto-asset investment impact on fund risk profiles
specific risks (volatility, liquidity, technological risk)
asset investments
*For AIFMs Managing AIFs with Crypto Exposure
Key Dates
4 February 2026- FAQ Version 7 effective date; MiCAR compliance requirements become operativeDEADLINE
1 July 2026- Deadline for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to transition from registration to authorization under MiCAR or cease operationsDEADLINE
The PRA's DP1/26 outlines its Future Banking Data (FBD) programme, reviewing strategic regulatory reporting for banks to reduce costs, enhance data quality, timeliness, and relevance, while aligning with its secondary competitiveness and growth objective. This discussion paper seeks industry feedback on pragmatic, incremental reforms to reporting templates, processes, and principles, balancing supervisory needs with proportionality. It matters for compliance teams as it signals potential simplifications in data submissions, but requires proactive engagement to influence outcomes and prepare for evolving requirements.
What Changed
DP1/26 proposes no immediate binding changes, as it is a discussion paper seeking views rather than a consultation with firm rules. Key elements include:
Incremental reforms: Extending recent template deletions (e.g., from Strong and Simple initiative for liquidity returns in small banks) to wider collections, aiming for cost reductions estimated at £26 million annually from prior cuts.
Guiding principles: Four principles to shape FBD: (i) anchor data in PRA objectives; (ii) collect data 'once and well' (minimize volume, maximize use); (iii) ease firm supply processes; (iv) ensure ongoing...
What You Need To Do
Submit responses
Review and assess impact
Engage proactively
Prepare internally
Key Dates
5 May 2026- Deadline for responses to DP1/26.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium – Not critical, as no immediate rules or deadlines beyond response submission (3+ months away from 5 Feb 2026). Matters for strategic planning: signals cost reductions but requires input to avoid unfavorable changes; aligns with PRA's 2026 priorities on data accuracy/quality (e.g., for risk reporting, stress testing). Firms with high reporting burdens should prioritize to influence simplifications and mitigate risks from evolving data needs (e.g., emerging risks, AI).
In October 2025, 25 financial institutions active in the UK foreign exchange (FX) market participated in the semi-annual turnover survey for the Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee (FXJSC).
Administrative sanction imposed on Genève Invest (Europe) S.A.
AI Analysis
The CSSF imposed an administrative sanction on 23 July 2025 against Genève Invest (Europe) S.A., a Luxembourg-regulated entity, for breaches of professional obligations, as detailed in a publication released on 4 February 2026. This enforcement action underscores the CSSF's focus on robust internal controls and compliance with investment rules, serving as a warning to investment firms on the consequences of organizational and conduct failures. Compliance professionals should note it as evidence of heightened CSSF scrutiny on fund managers handling client assets and counterparties.
What Changed
This is not a regulatory change or new requirement but an enforcement action highlighting existing obligations under Luxembourg law. Key breaches likely mirror patterns in recent CSSF sanctions, such as non-compliance with UCI Law provisions on investment policies (e.g., Articles 41, 43), sound accounting procedures (Article 109), and rules of conduct (Articles 111, CSSF Regulation 10-04), including improper cash deposits with unauthorized brokers and inaccurate asset valuation.
What You Need To Do
Immediate review of counterparty due diligence
Enhance valuation and accounting controls
Conduct internal audits
Update governance and reporting
Key Dates
23 July 2025- Date of administrative sanction imposition on Genève Invest (Europe) S.A.
4 February 2026- Publication date of the sanction document by CSSF.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – This sanction, published today (4 February 2026), signals ongoing CSSF off-site and on-site probes into fund operations, similar to fines imposed in July 2025 on Zeus Asset Management (€18,136 for UCI breaches) and a bank (reprimand for AML gaps). It matters due to escalating enforcement—fines calibrated to turnover (e.g., 10% in Zeus case)—and risks of reputational damage, especially for wealth managers with broker exposures. Non-compliance could trigger investigations, as CSSF considers infringement duration, cooperation, and history.
The FCA and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) have today issued a joint warning to claims management companies (CMCs) and law firms involved in motor finance commission claims to make sure consumers don’t have multiple representatives for the same claim and are not charged excessive termination fees. The regulators are reminding CMCs and law firms that they are expected to have robust checks in place to confirm consumers have not already instructed another representative. The FCA has also...
The FCA and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are warning claims management companies and law firms (representatives) involved in motor finance claims to make sure clients don’t have multiple representatives for the same claim and are not charged excessive termination fees We have seen some clients with up to 4 different representatives for the same claim. They risk being charged termination fees, which could be deemed excessive, should they try to cancel duplicate agreements.
AI Analysis
The FCA and SRA have issued a joint warning to claims management companies (CMCs) and law firms handling motor finance commission claims, addressing multiple client representations (up to 4 per claim observed) and excessive termination fees, which risk unfair consumer treatment. This matters because regulators are intensifying scrutiny amid a paused complaints-handling period (ending May 2026) and a forthcoming redress scheme, with enforcement actions already underway against non-compliant firms.
What Changed
This is a non-binding joint message reinforcing existing obligations under FCA's Consumer Duty, Claims Management Conduct of Business Sourcebook, Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA), and SRA standards, rather than introducing new rules. Key emphases include mandatory robust onboarding due diligence to prevent multiple representations, clear upfront disclosure of termination fees, and justification of any fees charged (especially if onboarding was inadequate).
What You Need To Do
Engaging clients and other representatives to confirm client wishes and establish single representative
Notifying respondent firms promptly of the sole representative
Supporting file transfers with client consent and considering no-charge resolutions if onboarding was poor
Robust onboarding checks (e
Entering new agreements only after prior termination and informed consent
Key Dates
May 2026- Current pause on motor finance commission complaints handling ends; non-CRS complaints must progress per DISP timelines.DEADLINE
End of March 2026- FCA to publish final rules on proposed Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme (CRS).
Early 2026- FCA expected to finalize redress scheme rules (per consultation responses). (https://www.akingump.com/en/insights/alerts/fca-consultation-paper-on-motor-finance-redress-published)
5 February 2026- FCA launches consumer advertising campaign warning of scammers (post-dated relative to publication).
7 October 2025- FCA letter to CMCs on related expectations.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High - Immediate risk of enforcement; FCA/SRA using CRA/DMCA 2024 powers (e.g., info requests from 9 law firms), 5 CMCs paused onboarding, 1 under investigation, SRA closed 7 firms. Matters due to paused complaints (ending soon), impending CRS, consumer harm from fees/delays, and proactive monitoring signaling broader crackdown on HVCC misconduct like excessive fees or poor due diligence.
The CSSF has released Version 7 of its FAQ on Crypto-Assets for Undertakings for Collective Investment, updated on February 4, 2026, to reflect the entry into force of the Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR). This guidance establishes binding investment limits, authorization requirements, and risk management standards for UCITS and AIFs investing in crypto-assets, fundamentally reshaping how Luxembourg-regulated collective investment schemes can engage with digital assets.
What Changed
The most significant regulatory modifications in Version 7 include:
*Investment Limits for UCITS
UCITS may invest indirectly in crypto-assets for a maximum of 10% of their net asset value (NAV)**. These indirect investments are limited to transferable securities that do not embed derivatives in accordance with Article 10 of the Grand-ducal Regulation of 8.
*Investment Limits for AIFs**
AIFs open to retail investors other than well-informed investors may invest in crypto-assets for a maximum of 10% of their NAV.
What You Need To Do
*Immediate Compliance Steps
*Portfolio Audit
*Investment Policy Updates
*Risk Management Assessment
*Investor Notification
Key Dates
February 4, 2026- FAQ Version 7 effective date (entry into force of MiCAR alignment)
July 1, 2026- Deadline for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to transition to CASP authorization or cease operationsDEADLINE
No specific implementation grace period- The FAQ does not specify a transition period for existing funds exceeding the 10% limit; firms should clarify this with the CSSF immediately
“Singapore’s Grant to the International Monetary Fund’s Trust for the Special Poverty Reduction and Growth Operations for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (“PRG-HIPC Trust”), to Support Sudan’s Debt Relief” - Second Motion Speech by Mr Alvin Tan, Minister of State for Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of National Development and Board Member of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), on behalf of Mr Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry, and Chai
First Motion Speech by Mr Alvin Tan, Minister of State for Ministry of Trade and Industry and Ministry of National Development and Board Member of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), on behalf of Mr Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry, and Chairman of MAS on 4 February 2026.
Institutional Regulatory developments Financing the economy Other professionals Journalists Listed companies and issuers The AMF awards its Marie-Josèphe-Vanel thesis prize in law to Vincent Ramonéda
The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FCA’s decision that Rangecourt SA (formerly Banque Havilland), Edmund Rowland, the former London CEO and Vladimir Bolelyy, a former Bank employee, acted without integrity. The Tribunal agreed with the FCA that significant fines should be imposed, deciding that fines of £4m, £352,000 and £14,200 were appropriate for Rangecourt SA, Mr Rowland and Mr Bolelyy respectively. The Tribunal also upheld the FCA’s decision to ban Mr Rowland and Mr Bolelyy from working i...
ESMA launches selection process for its next Chair 03 February 2026 About ESMA Careers Vacancies The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has launched the selection procedure for the position of ESMA Chair . This key leadership role offers the opportunity to shape the future of Europe’s financial markets and steer the organisation through an evolving regulatory and supervisory landscape. As a full‑time, independent professional...
AI Analysis
ESMA has launched a selection process for its next Chair, a full-time independent role based in Paris responsible for leading strategic direction, governance, and representation amid evolving EU financial markets regulation. This matters for compliance professionals as the incoming Chair will influence ESMA's supervisory priorities, enforcement approach, and adaptation to upcoming legislative changes like market integration proposals, potentially impacting how firms navigate cross-border supervision and reporting requirements.
What Changed
This publication announces no direct regulatory changes or new requirements; it is a vacancy notice for ESMA's leadership position rather than a policy update or consultation imposing obligations on market participants. Responsibilities outlined align with the existing ESMA Regulation, including chairing the Board of Supervisors and Management Board, strategy development, and navigating potential governance adjustments from the European Commission's market integration proposal.
Key Dates
3 March 2026- Application deadline for ESMA Chair position.DEADLINE
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Low. This leadership transition poses minimal immediate compliance burden, as it introduces no new rules or deadlines for firms; however, the new Chair's tenure from mid-2026 onward could shape enforcement consistency, risk-based supervision, and adaptation to reforms like DORA and EMIR 3, warranting long-term tracking by governance and public affairs teams.
Speech by Sarah Pritchard, FCA deputy chief executive, at the ABI Annual Conference. IntroductionIt’s hard to think of a more symbolic venue to discuss driving change in the insurance sector than the QEII Centre.Step outside, and you’re in the shadow of both the Houses of Parliament, and Westminster Abbey. Scrutiny, change and serving citizens on one side. Tradition on the other.That’s where insurance sits, too.As an industry, you have to balance the new with the non-negotiables – finding way...
On 12 December 2025, the Federal Office of Justice (Bundesamt für Justiz - BfJ) imposed a disciplinary fine amounting to 50,000 euros on Gateway Real Estate AG
AI Analysis
The Federal Office of Justice (BfJ) imposed a €50,000 disciplinary fine on Gateway Real Estate AG on 12 December 2025 for failing to submit its 2024 consolidated accounting documents electronically to the Bundesanzeiger operator, breaching section 325 HGB. This enforcement action underscores BaFin/BfJ's strict oversight of financial reporting obligations under the German Commercial Code (HGB), signaling heightened scrutiny on timely and proper disclosure for listed real estate firms. Compliance teams must prioritize automated electronic submission processes to avoid similar sanctions, as this case highlights procedural lapses as sanctionable offenses.
What Changed
No new regulatory changes are introduced; this is an enforcement action applying existing rules under sections 325 and 335 HGB. Section 325 HGB mandates electronic submission of consolidated accounting documents (e.g., annual financial statements, management reports) for public disclosure via the Bundesanzeiger. Section 335 HGB provides the legal basis for disciplinary fines up to €50,000 for non-compliance, emphasizing electronic format as mandatory since the HGB's digital disclosure amendments (effective post-2013 e-Bilanz reform).
What You Need To Do
Implement automated electronic submission workflows for HGB disclosures using Bundesanzeiger's XBRL/iXBRL formats to ensure compliance with section 325 HGB
Conduct annual process audits pre-deadline (e
Train finance/compliance staff on HGB electronic disclosure rules, including penalties under section 335; integrate into closing checklists
Monitor appeals/outcomes via BaFin/BfJ updates; for real estate firms, cross-check with prior BaFin probes (e
Enhance governance with senior manager attestation for disclosure submissions to mitigate organizational breach risks
Key Dates
31 July 2025- Standard deadline for AGs to submit 2024 financial year consolidated documents to Bundesanzeiger (3 months post-year-end per section 325 (1) HGB; Gateway's breach implies non-submission by this date).DEADLINE
12 December 2025- Date BfJ imposed the €50,000 disciplinary fine.
03 February 2026- BaFin publication date of the enforcement notice.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This matters due to the procedural nature of the breach—electronic submission is a basic, avoidable control failure amid BaFin's 2025 enforcement push on reporting/governance (e.g., fines on Deutsche Bank €23m, J.P. Morgan €45m for similar lapses). While the €50,000 fine is modest, it sets precedent for real estate sector scrutiny (link to BaFin's Gateway valuation probe), risks escalation to BaFin market abuse actions, and aligns with broader HGB digitization mandates. Firms with weak disclosure automation face cumulative fines/reputational harm, especially listed entities.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) and Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have announced the first cohort of banks and building societies to benefit from their joint Scale-up Unit. The Scale-up Unit announced last year is designed to build stronger ties and provide tailored support for fast-growing and innovative financial firms, helping them to grow sustainably at pace.The 6 firms that expressed interest and have been accepted to the first cohort are:Allica BankClearBankMonument BankNo...
The Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority have announced the first cohort of banks and building societies to benefit from their joint Scale-up Unit.
People who pay monthly for their insurance are saving around £157m a year, with over half the firms the FCA reviewed as part of a market study lowering the cost of premium finance. Interest rates for premium finance have fallen by an average 4.1 percentage points since 2022, saving consumers £8 on a typical motor policy and £3 on a typical home policy per year. The changes result from regulatory attention, fair value assessments and base rate reductions. The FCA has seen even more significant...
What does 'fair value' mean in financial services? It might sound like dry regulator speak, but it’s really asking a simple question – are customers paying a reasonable price for a product, compared to the benefits they get in return?This is not us setting a particular price or level of profit which firms can make. But it's a challenge to firms – can they provide evidence that their customers are getting a fair deal? If they can’t, then they need to look again.This applies across financial se...
AI Analysis
This FCA blog post clarifies the 'fair value' concept under Consumer Duty, emphasizing that firms must evidence a reasonable price-to-benefits relationship without the FCA dictating prices or profits. It matters because it signals ongoing FCA scrutiny and enforcement in sectors like cash savings, investment platforms, and premium finance, with demonstrated consumer savings of £167m annually from interventions. Compliance professionals must prioritize robust fair value assessments to avoid challenges, remedial actions, or enforcement.
What Changed
No new rules are introduced; this reinforces existing Consumer Duty requirements (effective July 2023 for new products, July 2024 for closed books) on fair value as one of four outcomes (products/services, price/value, consumer understanding, support). Key emphases include:
Firms must demonstrate evidence of fair value, assessing price against benefits, costs, and services delivered.
Ongoing reviews required throughout product lifecycle, with actions if fair value fails (e.g., improve, withdraw).
FCA rejects prescriptive interventions like 0% APR in premium finance to avoid market harm,...
What You Need To Do
Conduct and evidence fair value assessments
Review and act on failures
Monitor markets/products ongoing
Premium finance specific
Key Dates
2023Consumer Duty effective for new/open products (fair value assessments mandatory).
2024Closed book products brought into scope.
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – FCA is actively intervening (e.g., £157m savings in premium finance, £10m in platforms), with threats of enforcement for poor processes/evidence. Matters due to cultural shift under Consumer Duty; weak assessments risk fines, remediation, or product halts, especially in high-complaint areas like savings/insurance. Firms without frameworks face immediate exposure in supervisory reviews.
Reply to Adjournment Motion on “Make (Singapore) Equities Great Again” by Mr Chee Hong Tat, Minister for National Development, and Deputy Chairman of MAS, on behalf of Mr Gan Kim Yong, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Trade and Industry, and Chairman of MAS, on 3 February 2026.
Written reply to Parliamentary Questions on the Shared Responsibility Framework and real-time fraud detection standards expected of financial institutions in Singapore.
Artificial intelligence Innovation Fintech Journalists Investment services providers Investment management companies Listed companies and issuers A study by the AMF finds widespread levels of adoption in artificial intelligence by French...
Buy now, pay later: a common practice in online shopping. A survey by BaFin shows that deferring payments can be risky - especially for young consumers.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) suspects the unknown operators of offering consumers financial, investment and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation. Verto is currently offering its services via the website ajadetrpe(.)life.
The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) warns consumers about the services offered on the website wefi(.)co. BaFin has information that this website is being used to offer banking business and cryptoasset services without the required authorisation.
Speech by David Geale, executive director, payments and digital finance and Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) managing director, at the Payments Regulation and Innovation Summit 2026. A payments system that works for everyoneJust before Christmas I was in Billericay for the opening of the 200th banking hub.I got to chat to local people and business owners about the difference the hub will make to their everyday lives. It was great.Although if I’m honest, the biggest talking point was probably t...
The PRA Regulatory Digest is for people working in the UK financial services industry and highlights key regulatory news and publications delivered for the month.
In the WhatsApp groups, investors are recommended by “Harrison T Blake” and “Francesca Müller” to invest in financial instruments that can then be traded via the aforementioned app or the platform pc-asset-management[.]com.