Authorisation & Licensing in United States

What Changed

• *(Based on the SEC’s description and consistent with prior offering‑reform initiatives; specific rule and form cites will need to be confirmed against the proposing release once reviewed in full.)*
• The SEC proposes to modernize the shelf registration process for Form S‑3 and F‑3 issuers, including expanded use of automatic or “universal” shelves and greater flexibility to add classes of...
• The proposal would streamline incorporation by reference, allowing more categories of Exchange Act reports and exhibits to be incorporated into Securities Act registration statements and prospectuses...
• The SEC proposes to expand the use of “access equals delivery” for final prospectuses, permitting issuers in additional circumstances to satisfy Securities Act Section 5(b)(2) delivery requirements...
• The reforms would broaden the range of permissible communications in connection with registered offerings, including issuer and underwriter use of certain factual and forward‑looking information,...

Suggested Considerations

• Monitor the Federal Register and SEC website for the full proposing release text and the precise comment deadline for this rulemaking.
• Coordinate among legal, finance, and investor relations teams to prepare and submit a comment letter to the SEC addressing practical implications of the proposed offering and reporting reforms for your issuer, including any concerns about liability, operational feasibility, and investor impact.
• Inventory all existing shelf registration statements (including automatic shelves), universal shelves, and continuous‑offering programs and identify where proposed changes to shelf mechanics, incorporation by reference, or prospectus updating could affect structure, timing, or disclosure.
• Review current offering communication practices, including use of free writing prospectuses, roadshow materials, and research reports, and map them against the proposed expanded communications safe harbors to determine what additional flexibilities could be used in future offerings.
• Assess your firm’s use of Exchange Act reports incorporated by reference into Securities Act registration statements and plan to revise drafting and review procedures to take advantage of streamlined incorporation while managing Securities Act liability for incorporated information.

Key Dates

References

• [1] akingump.com/en/insights/alerts/sec-proposes-changes-to-r...
• [2] proskauer.com/alert/sec-proposes-reforms-for-business-dev...
• [3] sec.gov/files/rules/final/33-8591.pdf
• [4] skadden.com/insights/publications/2026/2026-insights/regu...
• [5] sec.gov/resources-small-businesses/small-business-complia...
• [6] sec.gov/rules-regulations/rulemaking-activity
• [7] scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1182...
• [8] sullcrom.com/SullivanCromwell/_Assets/PDFs/Memos/SC-Publi...

What Changed

• - Streamlined Reporting Items: Amendments propose removing or simplifying certain Form PF fields, such as reducing detailed breakdowns of investment exposures, counterparty data, and performance...
• Adjusted Filing Thresholds: Raise thresholds for "large hedge fund advisers" and "large private equity advisers" (e.g., from $1.5B to potentially higher AUM levels for certain funds), limiting who...
• Simplified Calculations: Eliminate complex aggregation rules for master-feeder/parallel structures, revert to prior methods for inflows/outflows and AUM (e.g., no double-counting exclusions for...
• Event Reporting Relief: Propose delaying or narrowing 72-hour current event reporting (e.g., for large hedge funds under new Section 6), responding to burden complaints from 2024 amendments. These...

Suggested Considerations

• Review Proposal: Download full proposing release post-Federal Register publication; assess current Form PF processes against proposed simplifications (e.g., audit AUM calculations, exposure schedules).
• Submit Comments: File detailed feedback by comment deadline, focusing on burden estimates, implementation feasibility, and alternatives (e.g., via SEC's online portal); prioritize if your firm files quarterly/detailed sections.
• Update Systems: Map current reporting workflows to proposed changes; pilot simplified data pulls for inflows, performance, and structures; prepare for potential transition rules if adopted.
• Monitor Extensions: Track related no-action relief (e.g., CFTC Letter 25-50 for interim burden reduction) and Form N-PORT extensions.
• Internal Training: Educate compliance teams on threshold changes and event reporting tweaks to avoid over-reporting during transition.

Key Dates

References

• [1] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-19-sec-proposes-amen...
• [2] corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2024/05/01/the-sec-and-cftc-overh...
• [3] kirkland.com/publications/kirkland-aim/2024/03/sec-increa...
• [4] willkie.com/publications/2024/03/sec-and-cftc-adopt-subst...
• [5] sec.gov/files/rules/final/2024/ia-6546.pdf
• [6] cftc.gov/csl/25-50/download
• [7] sec.gov/files/rules/final/2025/ia-6919.pdf
• [8] ici.org/news-release/sec-moves-to-reduce-burdensome-fund-...

What Changed

• This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements.
• Fraud in futures trading (CEA Section 6(c), 7 U.S.C. § 9).
• Fraud by associated persons of commodity pool operators (CPAs) (CFTC Regulation 4.41(a)(1), 17 C.F.R. § 4.41).
• Acting as an unregistered commodity pool operator (CPO) (CEA Section 4m(1), 7 U.S.C. § 6m).
• Controlling person liability for firm violations (CEA Section 13(b), 7 U.S.C. § 13c(b)), as applied to Matos over Aureus.[https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9212-26]

Suggested Considerations

• Registration verification: Confirm CPO/AP registration status via NFA BASIC (https://www.nfa.futures.org/basicnet/) before solicitations; prohibit any implication of CFTC "licensing" without proof.
• Marketing review: Audit all promotional materials for false claims (e.g., seals, signatures, fictitious licenses); require pre-approval by compliance.
• Fund segregation: Implement strict controls on pool participant funds, including third-party custody and daily reconciliations to prevent misappropriation.
• Controlling person policies: Document oversight duties for principals; conduct gap analyses for personal liability under CEA Section 13(b).
• Training: Mandatory annual training on CEA fraud provisions, with attestations.

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9124-25
• [2] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9148-25
• [3] forkeylaw.com/blog/categories/cftc-enforcement-actions/
• [4] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases?c=1180800&page=105

What Changed

There are no new regulatory requirements or changes imposed by this publication; instead, it documents a court-granted TRO that temporarily blocks Arizona's enforcement of state criminal and gambling laws against CFTC-regulated prediction markets, affirming CFTC's claimed exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts via federal preemption under the Commodity Exchange Act.

Suggested Considerations

• Monitor federal court dockets in the District of Arizona for updates on the preliminary injunction hearing and broader cases against other states.
• Document compliance with CFTC regulations for event contracts to demonstrate adherence to federal law in any state inquiries.
• Review state exposure for prediction market activities, pausing non-federal compliant operations in high-risk states like Arizona pending resolution.
• Enhance legal consultations on federal preemption defenses for ongoing or potential state enforcement. https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9211-26

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9208-26
• [2] tradeinformer.com/regulations/cftc-arizona-prediction-mar...
• [3] gamingintelligence.com/legal/228985-cftc-intervenes-in-ar...
• [4] news.bitcoin.com/cftc-seeks-injunction-restraining-order-...
• [5] complianceweek.com/regulatory-enforcement/cftc-sues-state...
• [6] grcreport.com/post/cftc-asks-court-to-step-in-as-arizona-...
• [7] mlex.com/articles/2463704/us-cftc-seeks-injunction-to-sto...

What Changed

• The CFTC's enforcement action establishes several critical legal positions:
• Federal Preemption Doctrine: The CFTC asserts that the Commodity Exchange Act grants it exclusive jurisdiction over event contracts and prediction markets, rendering state gambling laws inapplicable...
• Scope of Federal Authority: The CFTC claims "clear and longstanding exclusive jurisdiction" to regulate event contracts, positioning prediction markets as commodities derivatives rather than gambling...
• Injunctive Relief Sought: The CFTC is requesting both preliminary injunctions (immediate relief) and permanent injunctions (ongoing prohibition) preventing states from enforcing preempted laws...
• Declaratory Judgment Framework: The lawsuits seek court declarations that state gambling laws are "unconstitutional and invalid" if applied to prediction markets.

Suggested Considerations

• *For CFTC-Registered Prediction Market Operators:
• *Immediate Compliance Monitoring: Continue operating under CFTC registration while monitoring court proceedings; do not unilaterally cease operations in affected states pending injunction decisions.
• *Legal Coordination: Engage counsel to coordinate with CFTC enforcement efforts and provide evidence of compliance with federal registration requirements.
• *Documentation Preservation: Maintain comprehensive records demonstrating compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC regulations to support the federal preemption argument.
• *State-Level Engagement: Respond to any outstanding cease-and-desist letters through counsel; do not ignore state enforcement communications, but assert federal preemption defenses.

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9208-26
• [2] espn.com/espn/betting/story/_/id/48379446/cftc-sues-arizo...
• [3] lowenstein.com/news-insights/newsletters/fintech-five-apr...

What Changed

• - End of "regulation by enforcement": CFTC Enforcement will focus solely on policing fraud, abuse, and manipulation under existing CEA anti-fraud provisions, avoiding policy-setting via enforcement...
• Five explicit enforcement priorities: 1. Insider trading, with strong emphasis on prediction markets (e.g., misappropriation of nonpublic information violates CEA). 2.
• New cooperation policy advisory (forthcoming soon): Includes "significant changes" to declination policy, building on prior frameworks like mitigation-credit matrices and safe harbors for...

Suggested Considerations

• Enhance surveillance: Implement robust monitoring for insider trading in prediction markets, manipulation in energy, disruptive trading, retail fraud signals, and AML/KYC red flags; prioritize misappropriated nonpublic info detection.
• Update policies: Revise insider trading protocols to align with CEA anti-fraud provisions; train staff on prediction market risks (debunking "no insider laws apply" myth).
• Strengthen cooperation readiness: Develop self-reporting/escalation processes, remediation plans, and documentation for declination credit under forthcoming policy; review prior CFTC advisories (e.g., 2025 mitigation matrix).
• Conduct gap analysis: Audit AML/KYC programs for willful violations; assess exposure in priority markets (energy, prediction/crypto, retail).
• Monitor updates: Subscribe to CFTC Press Room for cooperation advisory and related actions (e.g., Feb 25, 2026 Prediction Markets Advisory post-enforcement cases: https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9185-26).

Key Dates

References

• [1] steel-eye.com/news/north-american-regulatory-priorities-f...
• [2] cftc.gov/sites/default/files/CFTC_FY2026_Presidents_Budge...
• [3] cohenmilstein.com/cftc-priorities-modernization-harmoniza...
• [4] beneschlaw.com/insight/ftc-enforcement-trends-in-2026-wha...
• [5] foley.com/insights/publications/2026/01/shifting-enforcem...
• [6] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9185-26
• [7] ftc.gov/news-events/news/speeches/enforcement-priorities-...

What Changed

• - Permanent Injunction: Peken Global is barred from future violations, specifically prohibiting U.S. participants from direct trading on its electronic trading and order-matching system without FBOT...
• Civil Penalty: $500,000 payment required; no disgorgement sought due to cooperation in CFTC investigation and related criminal proceedings (United States v. Flashdot Limited, et al., No.
• Dismissals: Voluntary dismissal with prejudice of all claims against Mek Global Limited, PhoenixFin PTE Ltd., and Flashdot Limited; dismissal of CFTC complaint counts II-V against Peken Global,...
• No new broad regulatory rules, but underscores CEA violations for off-exchange commodity futures, leveraged retail transactions, and unregistered FCM/SEF/DCM operations.

Suggested Considerations

• Verify Registration Status: Foreign platforms must confirm CFTC registration as FBOT if offering direct access to U.S. participants for futures/swaps/derivatives; implement geo-blocks or KYC to exclude U.S. users.[1 from provided content]
• Restrict U.S. Access: Proactively block U.S. IP addresses, require attestations of non-U.S. residency, and monitor for circumvention.
• Pay Penalties: Peken Global must remit $500,000 civil penalty per court order.
• Enhance Supervision/CIP: Implement effective customer identification programs (CIP) and supervision of activities, avoiding off-exchange leveraged retail commodity transactions.
• Monitor Affiliates: Dissolved entities (e.g., Mek Global, PhoenixFin) or non-operational parents (Flashdot) should ensure no residual U.S. exposure.

Key Dates

References

• [1] fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/new-neuf/nr/2025-09-25-eng
• [2] cftc.gov/LawRegulation/EnforcementActions/index.htm
• [3] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/8884-24
• [4] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9185-26
• [5] fxnewsgroup.com/forex-news/regulatory/cftc-reengages-in-d...
• [6] usaherald.com/cftc-mek-global-settlement-nears-in-kucoin-...
• [7] opensanctions.org/entities/us-cftc-2ab1ed098a80f19db560f5...
• [8] jdsupra.com/legalnews/doj-and-cftc-bring-charges-against-...

What Changed

• The CFTC FAQs address implementation questions arising from two prior staff positions:
• Tokenized Collateral Guidance (CFTC Staff Letter 25-39): Established the framework allowing futures commission merchants (FCMs) and designated contract markets (DCMs) to accept digital assets as...
• No-Action Position (CFTC Staff Letter 26-05): Provided temporary relief permitting FCMs to accept payment stablecoins, Bitcoin, and Ether as customer margin collateral, subject to specific...
• How registered entities should operationalize tokenized collateral acceptance
• Compliance with notification and operational risk management requirements

Suggested Considerations

• *Immediate (0–30 days):
• *Asset Classification Audit: Map every crypto asset in your portfolios, products, or platforms against the five-category framework (digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, digital securities) established in the March 17 joint interpretation.
• *Investment Contract Review: Identify any assets subject to active issuer promises of essential managerial effort—those remain securities regardless of category and cannot be treated as digital commodities.
• *FAQ Implementation Review: Obtain and review the full CFTC FAQs (available at https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9200-26) to identify specific operational questions relevant to your entity type.
• *Notification Protocol Establishment: If relying on the no-action relief for tokenized collateral, establish procedures to notify the CFTC of significant operational, system, or cybersecurity issues affecting digital asset collateral use (required for first three months of relief).

Key Dates

References

• [1] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-30-sec-clarifies-app...
• [2] consumerfinancialserviceslawmonitor.com/2026/02/cftc-and-...
• [3] klgates.com/Crypto-in-2026-The-Democratization-of-Digital...
• [4] genfinity.io/2026/03/17/sec-cftc-final-rule-digital-commo...
• [5] compliance-risk.com/sec-cftc-joint-crypto-asset-interpret...
• [6] cftc.gov/csl/26-09/download
• [7] sec.gov/files/rules/interp/2026/33-11412.pdf
• [8] fintechweekly.com/news/sec-bitcoin-ether-solana-digital-c...

What Changed

• The resignation itself does not constitute a regulatory change, but it creates operational uncertainty regarding the enforcement priorities and procedural reforms that Director Ryan had recently...
• Reduced enforcement for technical violations: Director Ryan had signaled that routine violations concerning reporting requirements, recordkeeping, and internal accounting controls should not...
• "Middle ground" approach: For non-fraud violations posing investor or market integrity risks, the Division was to pursue resolutions emphasizing remediation over punishment.
• Continued fraud focus: The Division was to maintain rigorous enforcement on fraud, insider trading, market manipulation, and scams targeting retail investors. Enforcement Manual Updates (Effective...
• Four-week timeline for post-Wells meetings with senior leadership (Associate Director level or above)

Suggested Considerations

• *Immediate (Next 30 Days):
• *Monitor Acting Director's statements: Compliance teams should closely track any public remarks or guidance from Acting Director Sam Waldon regarding enforcement priorities and procedural expectations.
• *Assess Wells submissions in progress: For entities with pending Wells submissions, evaluate whether the change in leadership creates opportunities to supplement submissions or request expedited meetings under the four-week timeline.
• *Review investigation status: Entities in early-stage investigations should assess whether the leadership transition may affect investigation trajectory or resolution opportunities.
• *Update compliance calendars: Ensure all enforcement-related deadlines and procedural requirements under the updated Enforcement Manual remain tracked and current.

Key Dates

References

• [1] dlapiper.com/en-us/insights/publications/2026/02/sec-enfo...
• [2] alston.com/en/insights/publications/2026/02/sec-leadershi...
• [3] goodwinlaw.com/en/insights/publications/2026/03/alerts-pr...
• [4] davispolk.com/insights/client-update/sec-updates-its-enfo...
• [5] jdsupra.com/legalnews/sec-s-division-of-enforcement-annou...
• [6] regulationtomorrow.com/2026/03/us-secs-updated-enforcemen...
• [7] governance-intelligence.com/regulatory-compliance/back-ba...
• [8] secretariat-intl.com/insights/the-evolving-sec-enforcemen...

What Changed

This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reaffirms existing CEA prohibitions on fraud in retail forex transactions (CEA Section 6(c)(1) and Regulation 180.1), CPO/CTA fraud, and related violations, with penalties triple the monetary gain and permanent injunctions. The judgment highlights judicial emphasis on exploiting vulnerable communities, such as non-English-speaking groups reliant on advisors.

Suggested Considerations

• Conduct gap analyses of retail forex, CPO, and CTA operations for fraud risks, especially in customer communications and targeting vulnerable groups.
• Enhance disclosures, suitability assessments, and recordkeeping to demonstrate non-reliance exploitation.
• Review parallel criminal risks (e.g., wire fraud, money laundering) and coordinate with counsel for SEC/DOJ exposure.
• Implement training on CEA Sections 4k, 4m, 4n, and Regulations 5.2-5.18 for retail forex; ensure CPO/CTA exemptions are valid.
• Monitor for restitution collection, noting CFTC caution on defendant insolvency.

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9195-26
• [2] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9185-26
• [3] gibsondunn.com/the-cftc-advises-prediction-market-users-i...
• [4] paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/cftc-chairman-outline...
• [5] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases?c=1006400&page=7
• [6] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9194-26
• [7] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9192-26
• [8] foley.com/insights/publications/2026/01/shifting-enforcem...

What Changed

• This ANPRM proposes no immediate changes, as it is an early-stage consultation seeking input on:
• Application of Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) core principles and existing CFTC regulations to prediction markets.
• Criteria for prohibiting event contracts deemed contrary to the public interest (e.g., potentially sports, politics, or sensitive topics like government employee outcomes).
• Cost-benefit analyses for regulating prediction markets. It builds on prior actions, including withdrawal of a 2024 proposed ban on certain event contracts and a 2025 staff advisory on sports-related...

Suggested Considerations

• Submit comments: Affected parties should prepare and file written comments within 45 days via the CFTC Public Comments Portal, addressing ANPRM questions on CEA principles, prohibited contracts, and costs/benefits.
• Monitor developments: Track Federal Register publication, related litigation (e.g., state challenges to CFTC jurisdiction), and CFTC Enforcement Division advisories. (https://www.cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9183-26)

Key Dates

References

• [1] bakermckenzie.com/en/insight/publications/2026/02/united-...
• [2] paulweiss.com/insights/client-memos/cftc-chairman-outline...
• [3] corporatecomplianceinsights.com/cftc-withdraws-proposed-r...
• [4] quickreads.ext.katten.com/post/102mkjy/know-the-outcome-d...
• [5] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9183-26
• [6] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9185-26
• [7] next.io/news/regulation/cftc-chief-signals-imminent-predi...

What Changed

This announcement introduces no new regulatory rules, requirements, or statutory changes; it is a personnel appointment reshaping enforcement leadership. Chairman Selig highlighted Miller's role in refocusing the Enforcement Division on "policing fraud, abuse, and manipulation rather than setting policy," potentially signaling reduced pursuit of novel legal theories and a narrower enforcement scope.

Suggested Considerations

• Review internal controls for fraud, manipulation, and abusive trading, prioritizing digital asset activities (e.g., derivatives, prediction markets).
• Assess exposure from Miller's past cases (e.g., BitMEX, ICOs, Ooki DAO) and strengthen defenses against similar enforcement theories.
• Monitor CFTC enforcement dockets and coordinate with counsel experienced in CFTC/SEC/DOJ matters for upcoming investigations.
• Update training on "core" violations (fraud, abuse, manipulation) to align with stated enforcement focus.

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9187-26
• [2] mexc.com/news/837224
• [3] cryptorank.io/news/feed/8787a-cftc-enforcement-director-d...
• [4] gtlaw.com/en/professionals/m/miller-david-i
• [5] mexc.co/en-NG/news/836686
• [6] hoodline.com/2026/03/ex-cia-prosecutor-to-run-cftc-s-cryp...

What Changed

• The advisory does not introduce new rules but rather reaffirms existing CFTC enforcement authority over prediction markets and clarifies the scope of prohibited conduct:
• Insider trading/misappropriation: Trading based on material nonpublic information obtained through a breach of fiduciary duty or pre-existing duty of trust and confidence (Section 6(c)(1) of the...
• Fraud and manipulation: Use of manipulative schemes or artifices to defraud, including trading in contracts where the trader has direct or indirect influence over the outcome
• Pre-arranged and wash trades: Noncompetitive trading under Section 4c(a)(1) and (2)(A) and Regulation 1.38(a)
• Disruptive trading practices: Violations under Section 4c(a)(5) The advisory demonstrates the CFTC's commitment to enforce these prohibitions on prediction market platforms, reinforcing that...

Suggested Considerations

• *For Prediction Market Platforms (DCMs):
• *Implement robust surveillance systems to detect trading by individuals with material nonpublic information or direct/indirect influence over contract outcomes
• *Establish clear trading prohibitions in exchange rules addressing:
• Trading in contracts where the trader has influence over the outcome
• Trading based on material nonpublic information obtained through breach of duty

Key Dates

References

• [1] jdsupra.com/legalnews/cftc-files-amicus-brief-urging-3494...
• [2] mlex.com/mlex/articles/2446145/us-cftc-issues-prediction-...
• [3] gibsondunn.com/derivatives-legislative-and-regulatory-wee...
• [4] hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2026/02/prediction-mar...
• [5] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases
• [6] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9158-26
• [7] heinrich.senate.gov/newsroom/press-releases/heinrich-urge...

What Changed

• - Withdrawal of the June 10, 2024, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking titled “Event Contracts,” which proposed prohibiting political event contracts as contrary to public interest (e.g., akin to war or...
• Withdrawal of CFTC Staff Letter 25-36 (issued Sept. 30, 2025), a Staff Advisory cautioning designated contract markets (DCMs) against offering sports event contracts due to litigation risks and state...
• Commitment to new event contracts rulemaking based on a "rational and coherent interpretation of the Commodity Exchange Act" to promote innovation, with clear standards for prediction markets; CFTC...

Suggested Considerations

• Review and disregard prior compliance programs built around the 2024 proposal or 2025 advisory (e.g., cease preparations for prohibiting political/sports contracts).
• Monitor CFTC docket for new event contracts rulemaking notice and provide comments during any future consultation period.
• Assess current offerings for event contracts under existing Commodity Exchange Act prohibitions (e.g., gaming, manipulation); document reliance on CFTC's innovation stance pending new rules.
• Evaluate litigation exposure, especially state gaming regulator actions; prepare for potential CFTC intervention asserting exclusive jurisdiction.
• No immediate prohibitions lifted or mandates imposed—continue operating within current CEA framework (e.g., anti-fraud, market integrity).

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9179-26
• [2] corporatecomplianceinsights.com/cftc-withdraws-proposed-r...
• [3] en.bloomingbit.io/feed/news/105447
• [4] binance.com/en-KZ/square/post/02-05-2026-cftc-withdraws-p...
• [5] cohenmilstein.com/cftc-priorities-modernization-harmoniza...
• [6] zwillgen.com/gaming/cftc-signals-new-era-for-prediction-m...
• [7] cftc.gov

What Changed

• - Effective January 1, 2023, amendments to FINRA Rule 1240 mandate annual completion of both Regulatory Element and Firm Element for all registered persons, per CE Council...
• Launched July 1, 2024, the Financial Learning Experience (FLEX) serves as an optional centralized catalog for Firm Element e-learning courses to support written training...
• 2025 Regulatory Element courses are pre-assigned via FinPro Gateway, with topics viewable via FINRA's interactive tool; changes occur if registrations are...

Suggested Considerations

• Registered persons: Log into FinPro Gateway to complete assigned 2025 Regulatory Element courses by deadline (or request extension via firm for good cause); update contact info for notifications.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
• Firms: Conduct annual Firm Element needs analysis and develop written training plans using FLEX and published Regulatory topics; monitor completion, request extensions if needed, and maintain records.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]
• Verify FinPro access/recovery; contact FINRA Testing and Continuing Education Department for questions.[https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-20250814]

Key Dates

References

• [1] stcusa.com/resource-center/news-updates/understanding-the...
• [2] nasaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/IAR-CE-FAQs-2025.pdf
• [3] finra.org/registration-exams-ce/continuing-education
• [4] questce.com/blog-finra-reminds-firms-of-ce-deadlines-and-...
• [5] finra.org/registration-exams-ce/qualification-exams/mqp
• [6] finra.org/rules-guidance/notices/information-notice-071224

What Changed

The enforcement actions establish precedent in three critical areas: Market Manipulation (Spoofing): The CFTC secured consent orders against precious metals futures traders for spoofing—placing and canceling orders to create false market impressions. The orders impose three-year and six-month trading bans and require cease-and-desist compliance with the Commodity Exchange Act's spoofing prohibition. Misappropriation and Fictitious Trading: The CFTC obtained permanent injunctive relief requiring disgorgement of unlawful gains ($135,788) plus civil penalties ($200,000), with 18-month trading...

Suggested Considerations

• *For Registered Futures Firms and Banks:
• trade and post-trade compliance controls
• *For Commodity Pool Operators and Investment Advisors:
• by-jurisdiction licensing analyses before soliciting investors
• *For All Market Participants:

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9168-26
• [2] jdsupra.com/legalnews/states-step-up-enforcement-of-crypt...
• [3] cftc.gov/LawRegulation/EnforcementActions/index.htm
• [4] foley.com/insights/publications/2026/01/shifting-enforcem...
• [5] lowenstein.com/news-insights/newsletters/crypto-brief-jan...
• [6] cftc.gov
• [7] cohenco.com/knowledge-center/insights/january-2026/cftc-n...
• [8] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases

What Changed

The CFTC has obtained federal court orders imposing civil monetary penalties and trading bans on individuals and firms for spoofing and misappropriating confidential information. The CFTC has also charged an unregistered commodity pool operator with fraud and registration violations.

Suggested Considerations

• Verify registration with the CFTC at NFA BASIC before committing funds
• Review and update anti-spoofing and anti-fraud policies and procedures
• Ensure compliance with CFTC regulations regarding commodity pool operations and futures market participation

Key Dates

Related Regulations

What Changed

• - Raise the RAUM threshold for RIAs to qualify as small entities from $25 million to $1 billion, with conforming changes for control affiliates.
• Increase the net asset threshold for investment companies from $50 million to $10 billion.
• Update aggregation of related funds from "group of related investment companies" to "family of investment companies" as defined in Form N-CEN for easier identification.
• Introduce inflation adjustments to thresholds every 10 years via SEC order, without formal rulemaking.
• Make corresponding amendments to Form ADV and rules on continuing hardship exemptions for electronic filing.

Suggested Considerations

• Submit public comments by the deadline to influence thresholds, alternatives (e.g., client types, headcount), or exclusions (e.g., funds advised by small RIAs).
• Monitor Federal Register for exact publication and comment instructions; review proposed rule and fact sheet on SEC site (https://www.sec.gov/rules-regulations/2026/01/s7-2026-01).
• Assess internal status: Calculate current RAUM/net assets against new thresholds to anticipate RFA benefits in upcoming rulemakings.
• No immediate compliance changes, as this affects SEC rulemaking process only; prepare for potential indirect impacts via future rules.

Key Dates

References

• [1] sewkis.com/publications/sec-proposes-amendments-to-small-...
• [2] regulatoryandcompliance.com/2026/01/sec-proposes-expanded...
• [3] jdsupra.com/legalnews/sec-proposes-amendments-to-small-en...
• [4] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2026-1-sec-proposes-amend...
• [5] freewritings.law/2026/01/sec-proposes-updates-to-small-en...
• [6] sec.gov/rules-regulations/2026/01/s7-2026-01
• [7] questce.com/sec-proposal-may-redefine-ria-small-entity-st...
• [8] sullivanlaw.com/viewpoints/sec-proposes-amendments-to-sma...

What Changed

There are no main regulatory changes, new requirements, or policy updates in this announcement; it is solely a personnel departure notice with no substantive regulatory implications.

Suggested Considerations

• related delays and monitor for successor announcements via https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases.

Key Dates

References

• [1] sifma.org/people/nekia-hackworth-jones-esq
• [2] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-146-deputy-director-...
• [3] securitiesdocket.com/2025/12/30/deputy-director-of-enforc...
• [4] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2020-304
• [5] ali.org/profile/3204
• [6] jonesday.com/en/news/2026/01/former-sec-deputy-director-n...

What Changed

• This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reinforces longstanding CEA and CFTC rules on:
• Mandatory registration as a Commodity Pool Operator (CPO) and Associated Persons (APs) for pools trading commodity futures (CFTC Regulation 4.13 exemptions do not apply here due to fraud and public...
• Prohibitions on fraud, misrepresentations, guarantees of profit, non-disclosure of risks, commingling funds, and operating pools as non-separate entities (CEA Section 4o, Regulations 4.20, 4.21).
• Compliance with prior CFTC orders barring trading or registration-required activities.

Suggested Considerations

• Verify registration: Check CFTC/NFA BASIC database before engaging with pools or advisors; unregistered status warrants avoidance.
• Implement controls: Segregate pool funds (Regulation 4.20), avoid commingling, disclose risks fully, prohibit profit guarantees/misrepresentations, and issue accurate statements.
• Conduct due diligence: Screen principals for prior CFTC orders; cease activities if barred.
• Train staff: On fraud red flags (e.g., Ponzi payments, high-yield promises) and report suspicions via CFTC hotline (866-FON-CFTC) or online tip form.
• For SEC-registered advisers: Evaluate eligibility for CFTC Letter 25-50 relief to avoid dual registration while ensuring pools limit to qualified eligible persons (QEPs).

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9140-25
• [2] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9168-26
• [3] sidley.com/en/insights/newsupdates/2025/12/us-commodity-f...
• [4] ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/12/cftc-provides-in...
• [5] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9160-25
• [6] haynesboone.com/news/alerts/cftc-no-action-letter-provide...
• [7] cftc.gov/LawRegulation/EnforcementActions/index.htm
• [8] alston.com/en/insights/publications/2025/12/cftc-registra...

What Changed

This is an enforcement action, not a rulemaking, so there are no new regulatory changes or requirements. It reaffirms existing CEA prohibitions on fraud, including Section 6(c)(1), 7 U.S.C. § 9(1), and 17 C.F.R. § 180.1(a)(1)-(3), covering material misrepresentations, omissions, and deceptive schemes in precious metals sales.

Suggested Considerations

• Conduct immediate fraud risk assessments on precious metals sales scripts, disclosures, and pricing markups to ensure no material misrepresentations or undisclosed overcharges.
• Enhance senior investor protections, including suitability reviews, cooling-off periods, and training on vulnerable customer targeting bans.
• Review controlling person policies for good faith oversight, documenting supervisory failures to avoid personal liability.
• Audit parallel SEC/CFTC exposures in commodity-linked activities, preparing for offset calculations in multi-agency actions.
• Update compliance manuals with this case as precedent for CEA fraud in physical commodities; monitor whistleblower notices for internal reporting incentives.

Key Dates

References

• [1] cftc.gov/PressRoom/PressReleases/9139-25
• [2] cftc.gov/media/12781/enfSafeguardMetalsLLCDecision093025/...
• [3] whistleblower.gov/notices/2025-015
• [4] oag.maryland.gov/News/Pages/Office-of-Maryland-Attorney-G...
• [5] nasaa.org/77724/states-cftc-final-judgment-precious-metal...
• [6] cftc.gov/media/12776/enfSafeguardMetalsLLCJudgementOrder0...
• [7] securities.utah.gov/2025/10/17/utah-division-of-securitie...
• [8] finance.idaho.gov/department-of-finance-cftc-and-29-state...

What Changed

• This announcement itself introduces no new regulatory changes or requirements; it is a personnel update. However, it occurs amid broader Enforcement Division restructuring, including:
• Consolidation from one Deputy Director to four (three regional: Northeast, Southeast, West; one for specialized units), reducing reporting lines for a more unified nationwide enforcement program.
• Rescission in March 2025 of delegated authority for the Enforcement Director to issue formal orders of investigation, now requiring direct Commission authorization to align with priorities.
• Emphasis on transparency, such as sharing legal theories and evidence with defense counsel during Wells processes, rewarding cooperation, self-reporting, and remediation, while avoiding novel legal...

Suggested Considerations

• Review ongoing Northeast Regional Office investigations for potential leadership changes and engage early with new deputies on cooperation opportunities.
• Enhance internal self-reporting and remediation protocols to align with Enforcement's stated rewards for cooperation and robust Wells processes.
• Update compliance training on restructured reporting lines and Commission-authorized formal orders, ensuring defenses stick to established securities laws rather than novel theories.
• Monitor SEC staff directory for replacement announcements, such as potential roles for Samuel Waldon or others in the Northeast.

Key Dates

References

• [1] mcguirewoods.com/client-resources/alerts/2025/6/a-new-day...
• [2] sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2025-146-deputy-director-...
• [3] dechert.com/knowledge/onpoint/2025/6/under-new-leadership...
• [4] corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2026/01/21/sec-enforcement-2025-y...
• [5] skadden.com/insights/publications/2025/04/trump-administr...
• [6] perkinscoie.com/insights/update/sec-speaks-2025-four-key-...
• [7] morganlewis.com/pubs/2025/12/securities-enforcement-round...
• [8] clearygottlieb.com/news-and-insights/publication-listing/...