Live Updates

Kestra Private Wealth Services, LLC

AI Analysis

The SEC entered a settled administrative order against Kestra Private Wealth Services, LLC for failing to fully and fairly disclose compensation received by its affiliated broker-dealer and the related conflicts of interest in connection with mutual fund transactions and related services. The matter matters to compliance teams because it reinforces the SEC’s focus on affiliate compensation, conflict disclosure, and written controls under the Investment Advisers Act.

Key dates

2021-07-09
SEC announced settled administrative proceedings against Kestra Advisory Services, LLC and Kestra Private Wealth Services, LLC
2026-08-12
SEC administrative proceedings index and SEC newsroom list the Kestra Private Wealth Services matter under Release No. 34-106110

Suggested considerations

  • Compliance teams may wish to review whether disclosures about affiliated compensation, markups, and related conflicts are specific and prominent enough for advisory clients.
  • Firms should consider testing mutual fund trade processing and fee assessment workflows for undisclosed economic benefits to affiliates.
  • Dual registrants may wish to assess whether advisory and broker-dealer compliance functions are coordinated so disclosures, operations, and compensation schedules are aligned.
  • Firms may wish to examine whether written policies and procedures are detailed enough to detect and prevent conflicts tied to transaction fees and non-transaction service fees.
  • Wealth management firms may wish to compare client-facing disclosures against internal agreements and operational fee flows to identify inconsistencies.
  • Compliance teams may wish to consider periodic testing of conflict disclosures and fee practices to determine whether similar issues would be identified before an exam or enforcement review.

What changed

This is an enforcement order, not a rulemaking, so it does not create new requirements. It nonetheless reinforces that investment advisers must provide full and fair disclosure of conflicts created when an affiliated broker-dealer receives compensation from mutual fund trades and related services, including situations described by the SEC as fee markups. The order also underscores the need for written compliance policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violations, which the SEC tied to Rule 206(4)-7. The SEC found violations of Sections 206(2) and 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-7.

Compliance impact

The SEC imposed a cease-and-desist order, a censure, disgorgement of $208,187, prejudgment interest of $31,382, and a civil penalty of $60,000 against Kestra Private Wealth Services, and indicated the funds would be distributed to harmed investors. The practical consequence for firms is heightened enforcement risk where affiliated compensation and client fee economics are not clearly disclosed and

Who is affected

  • Investment advisers
  • Dual registrants
  • Wealth management firms
  • Broker-dealers supporting advisory clients
  • Wrap fee program sponsors
  • Firms advising on or transacting in mutual funds
  • Firms with affiliated compensation-sharing arrangements
  • Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Section 206(2)
  • Investment Advisers Act of 1940 Section 206(4)
  • Rule 206(4)-7

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original SEC source before acting. Full disclaimer.

What the SEC said

Kestra Private Wealth Services, LLC

Published by SEC . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.

Relevant Firm Types

Asset ManagerBroker DealerWealth ManagerAll Firms
View Original on SEC Back to Feed

Share this update