Live Updates

New Q&As available

AI Analysis

What Changed

  • - ESMA added a Q&A clarifying consulting activities to investors or undertakings under the EU ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR), which is relevant where a ratings providerโ€™s advisory services may overlap with regulated ESG ratings activity.
  • ESMA added Q&As on the application and scope of the two working day notification period under ESGRR, indicating that firms must apply the notification clock consistently and in line with ESMAโ€™s interpretation.
  • ESMA clarified access to the dataset for factual error review under ESGRR, which affects how rated entities or issuers can review underlying data used in ESG ratings processes.
  • ESMA added a Q&A on notifications without a designated contact under ESGRR, which is relevant for governance and outreach workflows when a notification lacks an identified recipient.
  • ESMA clarified the obligation to consider issuer feedback under ESGRR, reinforcing that issuer comments cannot be ignored and must be handled through a documented review process.
  • ESMA added a Q&A on ESG ratings used for internal purposes or in-house financial services, helping firms determine when internal-use arrangements may fall inside or outside the ESGRR framework.

Suggested Considerations

  • Review ESG ratings policies to ensure consulting, notification, issuer feedback, and factual error review procedures align with ESMAโ€™s latest ESGRR Q&As.
  • Update internal case-handling workflows so notifications are screened for the designated contact issue and the two-working-day notification period is calculated consistently.
  • Document how your firm distinguishes internal-use ESG ratings or in-house financial services from externally provided ESG ratings activity.
  • Reassess whether any second-party opinion business can rely on the ESGRR exemption and record the legal basis for that conclusion.
  • Re-map MiCA permissions for custody, administration, transfer, and lending services to confirm the firm is not performing activities outside its authorisation scope.
  • Compare crypto-asset advice offerings against MiFID II and MiCA to identify where the higher-risk perimeter issues arise and where disclosures or permissions may need adjustment.

Key Dates

10 July 2026
- ESMA publishes the new Q&As on ESGRR, MiCA, and MiFIR secondary market topics

Compliance Impact

Non-compliance risk is high because these Q&As affect how firms interpret regulatory scope, notification timing, and operational controls across sustainability, crypto, and market structure regimes. Firms that ignore the guidance may face supervisory challenge, remediation costs, and potential findings that their current procedures, permissions, or disclosures are misaligned with ESMAโ€™s expectatio

Who is Affected

ESG ratings providersSecond-party opinion providersIssuers and rated entitiesInvestment firms and advisersAuthorised crypto-asset service providers (CASPs)related services.Crypto-asset issuersoffer crypto-assets may be linked to custody or transfer service questions.

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions โ€” verify with the original ESMA source before acting. Full disclaimer.

Summary

New Q&As available 10 July 2026 Digital Finance and Innovation Sustainable finance Trading The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published the following question and answer: EU ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR) Consulting activities to investors or undertakings (2889) Application of two working day notification period (2719) Scope of two working day notification period (2890) Access to dataset for factual error review (2891) Notification...

View Original on ESMA Back to Feed

Share this update