Live Updates

The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its two directors for breaches of their professional obligations

AI Analysis

Executive Summary

The AMF Enforcement Committee has sanctioned French financial investment advisor **Financière Fonds Privés** and its two senior managers for (i) carrying out unauthorised **non‑guaranteed placement** activity, (ii) misrepresenting adviser **independence** while receiving issuer remuneration, and (iii) failing to provide mandatory suitability and cost disclosures between January 2021 and October 2024. This decision reinforces AMF expectations for French financial investment advisors (conseillers en investissements financiers – CIF) around strict limits of their regulatory status, independence disclosures, conflicts of interest management, and formalisation of investment advice.

What Changed

  • - Financial investment advisors must not conduct non‑guaranteed placement services (service de placement non garanti) such as actively seeking subscribers on behalf of issuers, unless they hold the appropriate investment services authorisation; email
  • Firms that present themselves as independent advisors must not receive remuneration (direct or indirect) from product issuers whose instruments they recommend, unless permitted under MiFID II/French rules and transparently disclosed; otherwise they r
  • When claiming independence, firms must provide accurate, clear and non‑misleading information on the nature of their independence, remuneration model, and any relationships with issuers or introducers; marketing or advisory materials that obscure iss
  • Financial investment advisors must issue a written suitability statement formalising the investment advice provided, setting out the client’s profile, the recommended products, and the reasons why the advice is suitable; failure to provide this writt
  • Pre‑contractual documentation must include full information on costs, fees and remuneration, covering both the advised investment and any business introducer partners; omission of these disclosures constitutes a regulatory breach.
  • Senior managers of financial investment advisors are personally accountable where breaches arise from the firm’s advisory model, placement practices or documentation failures; AMF may attribute all identified breaches directly to the relevant dirigea

Suggested Considerations

  • Review the firm’s regulatory status (CIF versus investment services provider) and ensure that any placement or capital‑raising activities are within authorised limits; discontinue or re‑authorise any non‑guaranteed placement services currently carried out under CIF status.
  • Conduct a comprehensive mapping of all services and activities (advisory, marketing, introductions, distribution) to confirm that none constitute regulated investment services (e.g., non‑guaranteed placement) without the requisite AMF/ACPR authorisation.
  • Inventory all remuneration flows from issuers and third parties, including commissions, retrocessions and fees, and assess whether they are compatible with any independence claims and MiFID II inducements rules; remove or re‑label “independent” branding where issuer remuneration is received.
  • Update client‑facing documentation (engagement letters, brochures, websites, emails) to provide clear, accurate and non‑misleading information on adviser independence, remuneration model, and any relationships with issuers or introducers.
  • Implement or enhance procedures to ensure a written suitability statement is produced and delivered to clients for each piece of investment advice, documenting client profile, recommended products and rationale; integrate this into advisory workflows and record‑keeping.
  • Review and revise pre‑contractual information templates to systematically disclose all relevant costs, fees, and remuneration associated with advised investments and with business introducer partners, in line with AMF/MiFID II disclosure standards.

Key Dates

January 2021
- Start of the period during which Financière Fonds Privés is found to have committed unauthorised placement and advisory breaches
October 2024
- End of the factual period examined by the AMF Enforcement Committee for the identified breaches
TBD (post‑21 July 2026)
- Potential appeal phase before the Conseil d’État; the decision indicates that an appeal may be lodged, so firms should monitor for any subsequent case law impacting interpretation of CIF professional obligations
21 July 2026
- AMF Enforcement Committee decision imposing fines of €100,000 on Financière Fonds Privés, €70,000 on Pierre‑Michel Deléglise, and €40,000 on Thierry de Chambure, and attributing all breaches to the two senior managers
28 July 2026
- Public announcement of the decision via AMF news release

Compliance Impact

Non‑compliance with CIF professional obligations on authorised activities, independence, suitability documentation and cost disclosures can lead to six‑figure fines, potential bans from advisory activity, and direct personal sanctions on senior managers.

Who is Affected

French financial investment advisors (conseillers en investissements financiers – CIF) operating under AMF supervision.Senior managers and directors of CIFsInvestment management companies and other MiFID investment firmsWealth and private banking businesses in FranceIssuers and promoters of securities seeking capital through CIF networks

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original AMF source before acting. Full disclaimer.

Summary

Sanctions & settlements professional obligations Other professionals Journalists Investment management companies The AMF Enforcement Committee fines a financial investment advisor and its two directors for breaches of their professional obligations

Relevant Firm Types

Asset ManagerWealth ManagerFamily OfficeAll Firms
View Original on AMF Back to Feed

Share this update