New Q&As available 28 May 2026 Digital Finance and Innovation Market Abuse Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU's securities markets regulator, has published the following question and answer: EU ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR) Defined ranking system (2853) Transitional provisions (2854) ESG rating providers established after date of entry into force (2855) Material changes to registration information (2856) Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) Regulation A...
ESMA has released new Q&As clarifying several operational aspects of the EU ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR), the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR) delegated audit requirements, and an exemption from MiCA white paper obligations for certain crypto-asset offerings. These Q&As materially affect how ESG rating providers structure their methodologies and registrations, how firms plan and evidence MAR compliance audits, and when MiCA white papers are required, and therefore should immediately be integrated into internal compliance frameworks.
What Changed
- - ESMA clarifies what constitutes a “defined ranking system” under the EU ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR), including when rating scales, score bands or league tables will be regarded as a ranking...
- ESMA sets out transitional provisions for existing ESG rating providers active before ESGRR application, detailing conditions and timelines under which they may continue operating while completing...
- ESMA explains how ESG rating providers established after the ESGRR date of entry into force must comply, including the need to obtain authorisation/registration before commencing activity in the EU...
- ESMA defines what qualifies as “material changes to registration information” for ESG rating providers under ESGRR, indicating the types of changes (e.g.
- Under MAR and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/957, ESMA clarifies expectations regarding the annually conducted audit of market soundings arrangements, including scope, independence of the...
Suggested Considerations
- Map all existing and planned ESG rating products against ESMA’s clarified concept of a “defined ranking system” and update methodologies, scales, and disclosures to ensure they meet ESGRR and Q&A expectations.
- For ESG rating providers operating before 02 July 2026, develop and execute a documented transitional compliance plan that aligns governance, methodologies, data controls and transparency with ESGRR, ensuring timely notification to ESMA within one month from 02 July 2026.
- For entities intending to launch ESG rating activities after ESGRR entry into force, prepare and submit complete authorisation or registration files to ESMA before commencing rating activity, incorporating the Q&A guidance on initial registration requirements.
- Establish or enhance a formal process to identify, assess and record “material changes to registration information” for ESG rating providers, and implement controls to ensure ESMA is notified within required timelines before or immediately after such changes, as specified in the Q&A.
- Review and update MAR compliance frameworks, with particular focus on market soundings procedures, to incorporate ESMA’s expectations on the scope, independence, and documentation of the annually conducted audit required under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/957.
Key Dates
– ESG Ratings Regulation (ESGRR) enters into force, starting the formal legislative timeline and triggering preparatory obligations for future ESG rating providers
– ESGRR applies and the main substantive requirements become effective; from this date entities have one month to notify ESMA of their intention to apply for authorisation or registration as ESG rating providers
Compliance Impact
Non-compliance with ESGRR, MAR and MiCA as interpreted in ESMA’s Q&As may lead to authorisation refusals or withdrawals, administrative fines, product restrictions, and heightened supervisory scrutiny. Given the enforcement nature of ESG ratings supervision and MAR/MiCA regimes, firms face significant conduct, reputational and business model risks if they fail to align promptly with this guidance.
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the
original ESMA source
before acting. Full disclaimer.
Asset ManagerBroker DealerCrypto Exchange ESMA issues guidance on effective use of resolution tools in CCP crisis planning 13 May 2026 CCP The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published a resolution briefing for Central Counterparties (CCPs). The briefing provides practical guidance to National Resolution Authorities (NRAs) on how to operationalise the write-down and conversion of instruments tool (WDCI). Marking an important step in ESMA’s wider efforts ...
All Firms
ESMA identifies areas for further supervisory convergence on compliance and internal audit in the funds sector 11 May 2026 Audit Fund Management The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published the results of its 2025 Common Supervisory Action (CSA) on the compliance and internal audit functions of fund managers , carried out in with the participation of all EU and EEA national supervisors. The EU-wide review found that m...
Asset Manager
ESMA outlines enforcement activities for corporate reporting across the EEA in 2025 07 May 2026 Corporate Finance Electronic reporting Financial reporting Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today published its Report on 2025 Corporate reporting enforcement and regulatory activities . The report provides an overview of how national enforcers and ESMA supervised corporate reporting across the Europea...
All Firms
ESMA consults on a new simplified approach to updating MMF stress test parameters 05 May 2026 Fund Management Simplification and Burden Reduction The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has today launched a consultation on a new approach to updating the parameters for stress test scenarios under the Money Market Funds framework. ESMA proposes replacing the current annual amendments to Section 5 of the Guidelines with an annual...
All Firms
ESMA promotes proportionate supervision of MiFID II sustainability requirements 06 May 2026 Investor protection The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has issued a statement presenting the results of its Common Supervisory Action (CSA) on how sustainability is integrated into firms’ suitability assessment as well as into processes and procedures for product governance. The statement highlights key themes emerging from the sup...
All Firms
ESMA publishes latest edition of its newsletter 10 April 2026 ESMA newsletter The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has published today its latest edition of the Spotlight on Markets newsletter. This edition opens with ESMA’s actions to simplify the retail investor journey and make investing more accessible, setting out steps to support retail participation in capital markets. Top news highlights include the publication of t...
ESMA's latest *Spotlight on Markets* newsletter (edition 42, published 10 April 2026) summarizes recent supervisory, enforcement, and policy actions, emphasizing simplification of retail investor access, high market risks per the first 2026 TRV report, and key publications on transparency, suitability, MiFID II/MiFIR data, and Listing Act compliance.[User Query] This matters for compliance teams as it signals ESMA's priorities in reducing regulatory burdens while enhancing investor protection and market transparency amid a high-risk environment.
What Changed
- The newsletter highlights no immediate binding rules but flags forthcoming or proposed changes via publications:
- Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities (TRV) Report 2026: Identifies high-risk EU financial markets, urging heightened risk monitoring.[User Query]
- Annual transparency calculations for equity and equity-like instruments: Updates pre- and post-trade transparency thresholds, published 27 February 2026.[User Query]
- Joint EBA-ESMA consultation on revised suitability assessment: Proposes updates to requirements for banks and investment firms on assessing client knowledge and needs under MiFID II.[User Query]
- ESMA proposals to simplify MiFID II/MiFIR obligations on market data: Aims to streamline reporting and data access burdens.[User Query]
Suggested Considerations
- Review and implement transparency calculations: Adjust trading systems and disclosures for equity/equity-like instruments per 27 February 2026 publication.
- Respond to consultations: Submit feedback on suitability (by 25 May 2026), EMIR 3 (20 April), MAR delays (29 April), CCP collateral (30 April); attend 15 April hearing.
- Assess TRV risks: Conduct internal risk reviews aligning with high-risk market warnings; update policies on retail investor journeys and fund costs.[User Query]
- Update compliance programs: Incorporate MiFID II/MiFIR simplification proposals, Listing Act statement, market abuse guidelines, EMIR 3, sustainability reporting, and new Q&As.[User Query]
- Monitor enforcement: Review supervisory actions for peer benchmarks (e.g., similar to prior MFSA review).
Key Dates
Publication of annual transparency calculations for equity and equity-like instruments
Release of first 2026 TRV report and newsletter; .
Public hearing on EBA-ESMA joint guidelines on suitability of management body and key function holders
Consultation deadline on regulatory standards for post-trade risk reduction services under EMIR 3
Consultation on MAR Guidelines on delay in disclosure of inside information
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium. This newsletter compiles ongoing developments rather than enacting immediate rules, but tied consultations (e.g., suitability by 25 May 2026) and recent publications (e.g., transparency calculations) require prompt review to avoid enforcement risks in a high-risk market flagged by TRV.[User Query] It matters for aligning with ESMA's simplification push while preparing for stricter suitability, data, and risk rules, potentially reducing costs but increasing scrutiny on retail protection and transparency.
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the
original ESMA source
before acting. Full disclaimer.
Asset ManagerBroker DealerBank ESMA sanctions Regis-TR for serious breaches of organisational obligations 19 February 2026 Press Releases Securities Financing Transactions Supervision Trade Repositories The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the European Union’s (EU) financial markets regulator and supervisor, has fined the trade repository (TR) REGIS-TR, S.A. a total of EUR 1,374,000 for seven infringements under the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR) and the Securities Financing Transactions ...
ESMA has fined REGIS-TR, S.A. €1,374,000 for seven negligent breaches of organisational obligations under EMIR and SFTR, marking the first SFTR enforcement action and ESMA's highest fine against a trade repository. The breaches involved deficiencies in policies, procedures, organisational structure, operational risk management, and data confidentiality, compromising SFTR reporting and market data integrity. This underscores ESMA's intensified enforcement on trade repositories (TRs) to ensure high-quality data for market surveillance and financial stability.
What Changed
- This is an enforcement decision, not new legislation, but it reinforces existing EMIR and SFTR requirements on TRs, particularly:
- Policies and procedures: Must be adequate to ensure compliance, with clear roles and responsibilities for governing bodies (breaches under EMIR Art. 78(3) and SFTR Art.
- Organisational structure: Must ensure business continuity and orderly functioning, especially for SFTR services (breach under SFTR).
- Operational risk management: Identify and minimise risks via systems, controls, and procedures (breaches under EMIR and SFTR, Point (a) Section II Annex I EMIR).
- Data confidentiality and integrity: Protect information received under EMIR and prevent misuse (breaches under EMIR).
Fines were calculated per EMIR Art.
Suggested Considerations
- For REGIS-TR specifically: Cease three ongoing breaches (policies/procedures under EMIR/SFTR; SFTR organisational structure for business continuity) per ESMA supervisory measures (EMIR Art. 73).
- For all TRs:
- Review and strengthen policies/procedures for clarity on governance roles/responsibilities.
- Audit organisational structure for SFTR business continuity and orderly functioning.
- Conduct operational risk assessments, implementing controls/systems to minimise risks under EMIR/SFTR.
- Enhance data confidentiality/integrity protections and misuse prevention measures.
Key Dates
- REGIS-TR initial registration with ESMA under EMIR
- REGIS-TR registration extended to SFTR reporting
- ESMA Supervisory Report identifying serious indications of breaches
- Public notice references investigations leading to findings (dated in decision docs)
- ESMA Board of Supervisors meeting discussing the case
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – As the first SFTR enforcement and record TR fine (€1.374M), it demonstrates ESMA's commitment to punitive action on negligence causing systemic data risks, directly threatening market integrity and surveillance. TRs face immediate remediation pressure (three breaches ongoing), with fines amplified by duration/systemic factors; non-TRs using TRs risk indirect exposure via poor data quality. Firms should prioritise audits now to avoid similar "negligent" findings.
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the
original ESMA source
before acting. Full disclaimer.
All Firms
ESMA supports the simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards and suggests targeted adjustments 18 February 2026 Issuer disclosure Press Releases Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority, the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, has delivered its opinion on the draft revised European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) developed by EFRAG. ESMA strongly supports the European Commission’s goal of enhancing competitiveness and growth through ...
ESMA has issued an opinion supporting EFRAG's draft simplified European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS) under the CSRD, praising improvements in readability and materiality focus while recommending targeted adjustments to enhance investor protection and financial stability. This matters for compliance professionals as it signals upcoming refinements to sustainability disclosures, with pragmatic supervision promised during the transition, potentially reducing short-term burdens but requiring monitoring of final delegated act adoption by summer 2026.
What Changed
- The draft revised ESRS introduce simplifications such as improved readability, language, format, reduced volume of requirements, and a focus on material matters.
- Introduce time limits to certain permanent reliefs (e.g., reliefs #3, #4, #9, #11 on quantitative information for anticipated financial effects until FY 2029, and metrics).
- Refine requirements on transition plans (e.g., consistent disclosure of absolute financed emissions and contextual information).
- Strengthen reporting on sustainability competences of administrative, management, and supervisory bodies.
- Enhance transparency on financial resources allocated to sustainability actions.
Suggested Considerations
- Monitor Commission process: Track final delegated act by summer 2026, incorporating ESMA/EBA/EIOPA/ECB opinions; review full ESMA opinion PDF for detailed recommendations.
- Assess current reporting: Evaluate use of permanent/temporary reliefs (e.g., #3/#4 on quantitative data, #9/#11 on metrics) and prepare for time limits; refine transition plans for emissions/targets.
- Enhance governance disclosures: Strengthen reporting on sustainability competences in management/supervisory bodies and financial resources for actions.
- Review subsidiary exemptions: Check materiality exclusions for sustainability risks/opportunities in consolidated statements.
- Prepare for supervision: Leverage NCAs flexibility during transition; integrate into data governance and risk systems per CSRD implementation trends.
Key Dates
- European Commission aims to adopt revised ESRS into a delegated act, considering ESMA, EBA, EIOPA, ECB opinions
- End of certain temporary reliefs on quantitative information for anticipated financial effects (if ESMA recommendations adopted)
adoption (2026+); - Learning curve period with pragmatic NCAs supervision and flexibility in examinations
Compliance Impact
Urgency: Medium - Not yet finalized (pending summer 2026 adoption), with pragmatic supervision promised, reducing immediate pressure; however, matters due to potential tightening of reliefs and disclosures impacting FY2026+ reporting, investor protection focus, and interoperability needs. Firms should prioritize if heavily using reliefs or with complex transition plans, as non-adjustment risks supervisory scrutiny post-learning curve.
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the
original ESMA source
before acting. Full disclaimer.
Asset ManagerBankInsurance ESMA promotes clarity in communications on ESG strategies 14 January 2026 Sustainable finance The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), the EU’s financial markets regulator and supervisor, published today a second thematic note on sustainability-related claims, focusing on ESG strategies. The note concentrates on ESG integration and ESG exclusions, as references to these strategies are often made by market participants and widely referenced in marketing communications directed to ...
ESMA published a thematic note on January 14, 2026, providing guidance on clear, fair, and not misleading communications regarding ESG strategies, specifically ESG integration and ESG exclusions, to mitigate greenwashing risks in non-regulatory materials like marketing. This matters because sustainability claims heavily influence investor decisions, and misleading communications can lead to supervisory actions, reputational damage, and loss of trust, aligning with existing EU rules under SFDR and related frameworks without imposing new disclosures.
What Changed
- This is not a formal regulatory change but supervisory guidance reinforcing four principles for non-regulatory communications (e.g., marketing materials, websites, investor presentations, voluntary...
- Accurate: Claims must fairly represent sustainability profiles without exaggeration, falsehoods, omissions, cherry-picking, vagueness, or misleading ESG terminology/imagery.
- Accessible: Information must be easy to understand and navigate, with layered substantiation in electronic formats for retail materials.
- Substantiated: Backed by clear reasoning, facts, processes, and methodologies; disclose data limitations and comparison bases.
- Up to date: Reflect current data, with timely disclosure of material changes and analysis dates.
Practical do's/don'ts include explaining ESG processes in plain language, disclosing portfolio...
Suggested Considerations
- Review and update all non-regulatory ESG communications (marketing, websites, presentations, DDQs, PPMs) against the four principles and do's/don'ts.
- Define and clearly explain ESG integration/exclusions (e.g., processes, criteria, thresholds, portfolio impact, materiality).
- Ensure consistency across channels, substantiate claims with accessible evidence, and avoid vagueness or overstatements.
- Train compliance/marketing teams; monitor for updates as further thematic notes may follow.
- Cross-reference with first note and regulations like SFDR, Cross-Border Distribution Regulation.
Key Dates
- Publication of ESMA's first thematic note on ESG credentials (to be read in combination)
- Publication date of the thematic note on ESG strategies (second in series)
Compliance Impact
Urgency: High – Immediate risk of enforcement for greenwashing in high-visibility ESG marketing, amid rising supervisory scrutiny; non-compliance threatens fines, remediation, and reputational harm as investor focus on sustainability grows. Proactive alignment builds trust and differentiates firms.
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the
original ESMA source
before acting. Full disclaimer.
Asset ManagerAll Firms