Live Updates

Suretyship and Guaranty; Segregated Deposit and Collateral

AI Analysis

NCUA finalized a rule amending 12 CFR 701.20 to remove the prescriptive segregated deposit and collateral requirements for suretyship and guaranty agreements. The rule is intended to reduce compliance burden and give federally insured credit unions more flexibility, while keeping the core safety-and-soundness limits that the obligation must be fixed in amount and duration and must create a permissible loan under the applicable lending rules.

Key dates

2026-08-06
Federal Register publication of the final rule at 91 FR 50661
2026-09-08 Deadline
Final rule becomes effective

Suggested considerations

  • Compliance teams may wish to update policies, procedures, and product templates that still reference the former segregated deposit and collateral formulas in 12 CFR 701.20.
  • Institutions may wish to review surety and guaranty programs to ensure the obligation remains fixed in amount and duration and is structured as an otherwise permissible loan under the applicable lending regulations.
  • FCUs may wish to confirm that any related lending analysis still addresses member lending limits and other applicable provisions, including where commercial lending rules apply.
  • FISCUs may wish to confirm continued state-law authority to act as surety or guarantor and verify any state-specific constraints or approvals before offering these arrangements.
  • Risk and compliance functions may wish to reassess collateral practices for these products in light of the new flexibility while preserving safety-and-soundness controls.

What changed

The final rule deletes the specific segregated deposit requirement in 12 CFR 701.20(c)(3) for suretyship and guaranty agreements. It also removes the detailed collateral standards in 12 CFR 701.20(d), including the prior 100 percent and 110 percent collateral categories and the requirement for a perfected security interest tied to those prescribed values. NCUA retained the two core structural safeguards: the FICU’s obligation must be limited to a fixed dollar amount and a specified duration, and the suretyship or guaranty must result in an authorized loan that complies with the applicable lending regulations. The rule leaves intact the requirement that FCUs comply with NCUA lending rules, and that FISCUs may engage in these activities only if permitted under state law and subject to applic

Compliance impact

NCUA describes the change as a reduction in unnecessary complexity and compliance burden, while maintaining safety-and-soundness constraints through the fixed-amount, fixed-duration, and lending-compliance requirements. The practical consequence is greater product-design flexibility for credit unions, but no relaxation of the underlying obligation to treat these arrangements as permissible lending

Who is affected

  • Federal credit unions
  • Federally insured state-chartered credit unions
  • Federally insured credit unions acting as sureties or guarantors
  • 12 CFR 701.20
  • 12 CFR part 723
  • Federal Credit Union Act

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original NCUA source before acting. Full disclaimer.

What the NCUA said

Final rule. The NCUA Board (Board) is amending its regulations to eliminate prescriptive segregated deposit and collateral requirements for suretyship and guaranty agreements. By removing these requirements, the Board is authorizing federally insured credit unions (FICUs) acting as sureties and guarantors to design…

Extract from NCUA . Read the full notice at the source for the authoritative text.

Relevant Firm Types

Credit UnionAll Firms
View Original on NCUA Back to Feed

Share this update