EBA, EIOPA and ESMA propose amendments to bilateral margin requirements
Executive Summary
The ESAs have issued a Final Report and draft RTS proposing targeted amendments to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 so that counterparties below the EUR 8 billion initial margin threshold under EMIR are fully exempt from exchanging initial margin, both on new and existing uncleared OTC derivatives. This materially simplifies bilateral margining for smaller in-scope counterparties, reduces operational and custodial burdens, and aligns the EU regime with similar reforms already implemented in other jurisdictions (e.g. UK EMIR). Compliance teams must prepare now for the transition from a โlegacy-onlyโ margining obligation to a complete exemption once the EUR 8 billion AANA threshold is no longer met.
What Changed
- - Counterparties whose average aggregate notional amount (AANA) of non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives falls below the EUR 8 billion threshold will no longer be required to exchange initial margin on *either* new or existing uncleared OTC derivativ
- The current framework, under which below-threshold counterparties are exempt from initial margin for new trades but must continue to exchange initial margin for pre-existing โlegacyโ contracts, will be replaced with a full exemption covering the enti
- Article 28(1) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251 will be amended to explicitly extend the exemption from initial margin requirements to outstanding contracts where one of the two counterparties falls below the EUR 8 billion AANA threshold.
- The RTS introduce a clearer operational framework for entry into and exit from the initial margin regime based on the annual AANA calculation for MarchโMay, including scenarios where one or both counterparties cross above or below the EUR 8 billion t
- Once a counterparty falls below the EUR 8 billion threshold under the revised rules, firms will be permitted to terminate related initial margin processes, including ceasing ongoing calculation, exchange and custodial segregation, subject to prudent
- The ESAs explicitly position these amendments as simplification and burden reduction measures, responding to industry feedback that ongoing initial margining for legacy trades below the threshold is disproportionately complex and costly.
Suggested Considerations
- Map all EMIR in-scope entities within the group and identify those whose AANA of non-centrally cleared OTC derivatives is close to or below the EUR 8 billion threshold, to assess which relationships may benefit from the expanded exemption.
- Review current collateral and margin frameworks to identify legacy contracts where initial margin is still being exchanged solely because the regime requires continuation despite the counterparty having fallen below the EUR 8 billion threshold.
- Prepare an internal policy update so that, once the RTS enter into force, initial margin requirements are switched off for counterparties below the EUR 8 billion threshold on both new and existing uncleared OTC derivatives, subject to group risk appetite.
- Update EMIR margin procedures and AANA calculation processes to ensure accurate annual determination of whether each counterparty is above or below the EUR 8 billion threshold, including documentation of the MarchโMay calculation methodology.
- Review and amend collateral agreements, credit support annexes (CSAs) and associated legal documentation to incorporate the revised treatment for below-threshold counterparties, including terms for stopping margin exchange and potentially releasing segregated collateral.
- Assess operational impacts on custodial arrangements and segregated accounts used for initial margin, and design a controlled process for closing or rationalising accounts where margin will no longer be required following a threshold breach.
Key Dates
Compliance Impact
The amendments reduce the risk of technical non-compliance for below-threshold counterparties by simplifying obligations, but firms that fail to correctly apply the new threshold-based exemption (e.g. continuing or ceasing margin exchanges incorrectly) may face supervisory findings, remediation demands and potential sanctions under EMIR. Non-compliance could also create contractual disputes and co
Who is Affected
References
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions โ verify with the original ESMA source before acting. Full disclaimer.
Summary
EBA, EIOPA and ESMA propose amendments to bilateral margin requirements 03 August 2026 Joint Committee Trading The European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA โ the ESAs) today published a final report on draft Regulatory Technical Standards (RTS), proposing to simplify the bilateral margin requirements of the European Commissionโs Delegated Regulation (EU) 2016/2251. The proposed amendments aim to simplify the bilateral margin framework for counterparties that are subject to initia...