CSSF communiqué relating to the publication of Q&A CNC 26/038, entitled “Large associations, associations recognised as being of public utility and foundations: targeted clarifications on the new accounting regime introduced by the Law of 7 August 2023” (only in French)
Executive Summary
The CSSF is formally drawing attention to CNC Q&A 26/038, which provides detailed interpretative guidance on the **new accounting regime introduced by the Law of 7 August 2023** for large not‑for‑profit associations, public‑utility associations and foundations. This matters for compliance teams because these entities are now subject to annual accounts obligations aligned with the regime for “medium‑sized undertakings” under the Luxembourg commercial companies law, with specific rules on formats, exemptions from PCN/eCDF, and forthcoming detailed guidance for all association size categories.
What Changed
- - Large not‑for‑profit associations, associations recognised as being of public utility and foundations are required to prepare annual accounting documents consisting at a minimum of annual accounts in accordance with the accounting regime applicable
- These entities fall within the regime applicable to “medium‑sized undertakings”, which drives the required content and level of detail of their annual accounts (balance sheet, profit and loss account and notes).
- The law and the CNC Q&A confirm that large associations, public‑utility associations and foundations are not legally required to use the Standard chart of accounts (Plan comptable normalisé, PCN) or to submit standardised financial data via the eCDF
- Although exempt from mandatory PCN use and eCDF standard data collection, these entities must still file their annual accounts with the Luxembourg Trade and Companies Register (RCS) using statutory LRCS layouts in “classic” format (i.e. non‑standardi
- Large associations, public‑utility associations and foundations are exempt from the obligation to file the PCN trial balance (balance générale) via the eCDF platform, even though they may still choose to use PCN on a voluntary basis.
- The CNC confirms that not‑for‑profit entities may voluntarily adopt PCN while retaining flexibility in their internal chart of accounts; where PCN is not adopted, they must ensure robust mapping from internal accounts to the statutory LRCS balance sh
Suggested Considerations
- Identify whether the organisation qualifies as a large association, an association recognised as being of public utility or a foundation under the Law of 7 August 2023, and document the classification decision with reference to Articles 18, 36 and 52 of that law.
- Update internal accounting policies to require annual accounts to be prepared in accordance with the regime for undertakings referred to in Article 47 LRCS, including minimum content (balance sheet, profit and loss account and notes) and disclosure requirements.
- Decide formally whether to adopt the PCN on a voluntary basis or to maintain an internal chart of accounts, and record this decision in accounting governance documents approved by the board or governing body.
- Where PCN is not adopted, design and implement a detailed and documented mapping from internal general ledger accounts to LRCS statutory balance sheet and profit and loss layouts to ensure accurate preparation and filing of annual accounts.
- Review and, where necessary, redesign annual accounts templates to comply with LRCS layouts while making only permitted adaptations (for example, titles and subtotals) that maintain clarity, comparability and consistency over time.
- Establish procedures to ensure timely filing of annual accounts with the RCS in classic LRCS format, including quality controls around completeness and correctness of notes and disclosures.
Key Dates
Compliance Impact
Non‑compliance primarily exposes large associations, public‑utility associations and foundations to deficiencies in statutory annual accounts and registry filings, which can lead to legal and governance risks, increased audit findings and potential supervisory concerns where the CSSF has a stake. For CSSF‑regulated firms, reliance on non‑compliant counterparties may undermine financial reporting i
Who is Affected
References
AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original CSSF source before acting. Full disclaimer.
Summary
No description available.