Live Updates

Circular CSSF 21/783 (outdated)

AI Analysis

Executive Summary

ESMA has withdrawn its MiFID II/MiFIR market data Guidelines because their subject matter has been transposed into Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156 on the obligation to make market data available on a reasonable commercial basis. As a result, CSSF Circular 21/783, which implemented those ESMA Guidelines in Luxembourg supervisory practice, will become formally outdated from 23 August 2026, requiring MiFID firms and trading venues to ensure their policies and commercial terms now fully align with the directly applicable RTS in the Delegated Regulation.

What Changed

  • - CSSF Circular 21/783, which applied ESMA’s Guidelines on MiFID II/MiFIR obligations on market data in Luxembourg, will cease to be applicable as of 23 August 2026 and is formally classified as “outdated”.
  • The supervisory reference framework for market data obligations in Luxembourg shifts from ESMA soft-law Guidelines to binding regulatory technical standards contained in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156 supplementing MiFIR.
  • Requirements on making market data available to the public on a “reasonable commercial basis” are now set out in directly applicable EU law, including detailed RTS criteria on cost-based pricing, non-discriminatory access, and unbundling of pre- and
  • ESMA’s interpretative role via Guidelines is replaced by binding RTS, which reduces reliance on national circulars and increases harmonisation of market data rules across EU trading venues and data providers.
  • Luxembourg firms can no longer rely on Circular 21/783 as the primary interpretative document for market data obligations; instead, their compliance frameworks must directly reference Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156 and core MiFIR provisions.
  • Any CSSF administrative practices or internal policies that explicitly implement or cross‑reference ESMA’s withdrawn Guidelines will need to be identified and updated to reflect the new RTS regime.

Suggested Considerations

  • Identify and catalogue all internal policies, procedures, contractual templates, and pricing frameworks that reference CSSF Circular 21/783 or ESMA’s MiFID II/MiFIR market data Guidelines.
  • Review Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156 in detail and map its RTS requirements (e.g. cost-based pricing, non-discriminatory access, data unbundling, publication formats) against current market data practices.
  • Update market data pricing policies to ensure that fees are demonstrably based on reasonable commercial basis criteria defined in Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156, including documentation of cost allocation and margin methodology.
  • Revise market data access policies and client terms to ensure non‑discriminatory conditions and appropriate unbundling of pre‑trade and post‑trade data, in line with the RTS.
  • Amend compliance manuals, MiFID/MiFIR control frameworks, and training materials to remove references to CSSF Circular 21/783 and ESMA Guidelines, replacing them with references to Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156.
  • Conduct a gap analysis comparing existing contractual arrangements with clients and vendors against the new RTS requirements, and implement contract remediation where terms conflict with or fall short of the Delegated Regulation.

Key Dates

12 June 2025
- Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156 is adopted, supplementing MiFIR with RTS on the obligation to make market data available to the public on a reasonable commercial basis
23 August 2026
- ESMA Guidelines on MiFID II/MiFIR market data obligations are withdrawn; CSSF Circular 21/783, which incorporated these Guidelines into CSSF administrative practice, becomes outdated from this date

Compliance Impact

Non-compliance will now be assessed directly against binding RTS under Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/1156, increasing enforcement risk if market data is priced or provided on terms that are not objectively “reasonable” or non‑discriminatory. Firms that fail to adapt their frameworks by 23 August 2026 risk supervisory findings, potential sanctions, and challenges to their market data commercial mo

Who is Affected

EU-authorised investment firms subject to MiFID II that consume or provide market data in Luxembourg.MiFIR-regulated trading venues (regulated markets, MTFs, OTFs) operating under CSSF supervision that provide pre- and post-trade market data.Approved Publication Arrangements (APAs) and Consolidated Tape Providers (CTPs) providing market data under MiFIR in or from Luxembourg.Luxembourg branches of non-EU investment firms subject to MiFID II/MiFIR obligations via local implementation and CSSF oversight.Compliance, legal, and market data commercial teams within banks, broker dealers, and other trading participants that set pricing and access conditions for market data.

AI-generated analysis. May contain errors or omissions — verify with the original CSSF source before acting. Full disclaimer.

Summary

No description available.

Relevant Firm Types

Broker DealerBankAsset Manager
View Original on CSSF Back to Feed

Share this update